Search

Immunotherapy; Thymic carcinoma; Thymoma Immunoteràpia; Carcinoma tímic; Timoma Inmunoterapia; Carcinoma tímico; Timoma Background Thymic malignancies are rare intrathoracic tumors, which may be aggressive and difficult to treat. They represent a therapeutic challenge in the advanced/metastatic setting, with limited treatment options after the failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. They are frequently associated with autoimmune disorders that also impact oncological management. Materials and methods NIVOTHYM is an international, multicenter, phase II, two-cohort, single-arm trial evaluating the activity and safety of nivolumab [240 mg intravenously (i.v.) q2 weeks] alone or with ipilimumab (1 mg /kg i.v. q6 weeks) in patients with advanced/relapsed type B3 thymoma or thymic carcinoma, after exposure to platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFSR-6) based on RECIST 1.1 as per independent radiological review. Results From April 2018 to February 2020, 55 patients were enrolled in 15 centers from 5 countries. Ten patients (18%) had type B3 thymoma and 43 (78%) had thymic carcinoma. The majority were male (64%), and the median age was 58 years. Among the 49 eligible patients who started treatment, PFSR-6 by central review was 35% [95% confidence interval (CI) 22% to 50%]. The overall response rate and disease control rate were 12% (95% CI 5% to 25%) and 63% (95% CI 48% to 77%), respectively. Using the Kaplan–Meier method, median progression-free survival and overall survival by local assessment were 6.0 (95% CI 3.1-10.4) months and 21.3 (95% CI 11.6-not estimable) months, respectively. In the safety population of 54 patients, adverse events (AEs) of grade 1/2 were observed in 22 (41%) patients and grade 3/4 in 31 (57%) patients. Treatment-related AEs of grade 4 included one case of neutropenia, one case of immune-mediated transaminitis, and two cases of myocarditis. Conclusions Nivolumab monotherapy demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and objective activity, although it has been insufficient to meet its primary objective. The second cohort of NIVOTHYM is currently ongoing to assess the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab.

COVID-19; Haematology; Nirmatrelvir COVID-19; Hematología; Nirmatrelvir COVID-19; Hematologia; Nirmatrelvir Background Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment decreases the hospitalisation rate in immunocompetent patients with COVID-19, but data on efficacy in patients with haematological malignancy are scarce. Here, we describe the outcome of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment in a large cohort of the latter patients. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study from the multicentre EPICOVIDEHA registry (NCT04733729) on patients with haematological malignancy, who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between January and September 2022. Patients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir were compared to those who did not. A logistic regression was run to determine factors associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir administration in our sample. Mortality between treatment groups was assessed with Kaplan–Meier survival plots after matching all the patients with a propensity score. Additionally, a Cox regression was modelled to detect factors associated with mortality in patients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Findings A total of 1859 patients were analysed, 117 (6%) were treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 1742 (94%) were treated otherwise. Of 117 patients receiving nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, 80% had received ≥1 anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dose before COVID-19 onset, 13% of which received a 2nd vaccine booster. 5% were admitted to ICU. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment was associated with the presence of extrapulmonary symptoms at COVID-19 onset, for example anosmia, fever, rhinitis, or sinusitis (aOR 2.509, 95%CI 1.448–4.347) and 2nd vaccine booster (aOR 3.624, 95%CI 1.619–8.109). Chronic pulmonary disease (aOR 0.261, 95%CI 0.093–0.732) and obesity (aOR 0.105, 95%CI 0.014–0.776) were not associated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use. After propensity score matching, day-30 mortality rate in patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was 2%, significantly lower than in patients with SARS-CoV-2 directed treatment other than nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (11%, p = 0.036). No factor was observed explaining the mortality difference in patients after nirmatrelvir/ritonavir administration. Interpretation Haematological malignancy patients were more likely to receive nirmatrelvir/ritonavir when reporting extrapulmonary symptoms or 2nd vaccine booster at COVID-19 onset, as opposed to chronic pulmonary disease and obesity. The mortality rate in patients treated with nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was lower than in patients with targeted drugs other than nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. EPICOVIDEHA has received funds from Optics COMMIT (COVID-19 Unmet Medical Needs and Associated Research Extension) COVID-19 RFP program by GILEAD Science, United States (Project 2020-8223).

Adenocarcinoma; Napabucasin; Pancreatic cancer Adenocarcinoma; Napabucasin; Càncer de pàncrees Adenocarcinoma; Napabucasin; Cáncer de páncreas Background Compared with normal cells, tumour cells contain elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Increased levels of the antioxidant protein NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) and phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (pSTAT3) correlate negatively with the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer. Napabucasin is an investigational, orally administered ROS generator bioactivated by NQO1. Methods In the open-label, phase 3 CanStem111P study (NCT02993731), adults with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) were randomised (1:1) to napabucasin plus nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine or nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine alone. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). In exploratory analyses, OS was evaluated in the subgroup of patients with tumours positive for pSTAT3 (biomarker-positive). Findings Between 30 January 2017 and 20 February 2019, a total of 1779 patients were screened across 165 study sites in Austria, Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine, and the US. Of the 565 and 569 patients randomised to the napabucasin and control treatment arms, respectively, 206 and 176 were biomarker-positive. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) OS in the napabucasin and control treatment arms was 11.4 (10.5–12.2) and 11.7 (10.7–12.7) months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93–1.23). Due to the lack of OS improvement in the napabucasin arm, CanStem111P was terminated due to futility. In the biomarker-positive subgroup, no difference between treatment arms was found for OS. Grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 85.4% and 83.9% of napabucasin-treated and control-treated patients, respectively. The incidence of gastrointestinal-related grade ≥3 events was higher with napabucasin (diarrhoea: 11.6% vs 4.9%; abdominal pain: 10.0% vs 4.8%). Interpretation Our findings suggested that although the addition of napabucasin to nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine did not improve efficacy in patients with previously untreated mPDAC, the safety profile of napabucasin was consistent with previous reports. CanStem111P represents the largest cohort of patients with mPDAC administered nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine in the clinical trial setting. Our data reinforce the value of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as a platform for novel therapeutics approaches in mPDAC. This study was supported by Sumitomo Pharma Oncology, Inc.

Consensus; Metastatic colorectal cancer; Treatment Consens; Càncer colorectal metastàtic; Tractament Consenso; Cáncer colorrectal metastásico; Tratamiento Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a heterogenous disease caused by various genetic alterations. The BRAFV600E mutation occurs in approximately 8–12% of patients and is characterised by an aggressive clinical course and poor prognosis. Here we review the current knowledge on BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC and provide a series of consensus statements on its clinical management. The treatment landscape for BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC has changed greatly due to the emergence of molecular targeted therapies (including BRAF inhibitors) and immune checkpoint inhibitors. A scientific literature search identified available data on molecular testing, treatments, and clinical monitoring of patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC. Consensus statements were discussed and developed by a European expert panel. This manuscript provides consensus management guidance for different clinical presentations of BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC and makes recommendations regarding treatment sequencing choices. To guide appropriate clinical management and treatment decisions for mCRC patients, tumour tissue analysis for DNA mismatch repair/microsatellite status and, at a minimum, KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutational status is mandatory at the time of diagnosis. Finally, we discuss the rapidly evolving treatment landscape for BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC and define priorities for the development of novel therapeutic strategies that are needed to improve patient outcomes. This work was supported by an unrestricted medical education grant from Pierre Fabre, whose only involvement was to select the chair and to fund LiNK Health Group to provide independent medical writing support to the author group. Pierre Fabre had no sight of the article during development and no editorial involvement.

Bevacizumab; Folate receptor alpha; Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer Bevacizumab; Receptor de folato alfa; Cáncer de ovario resistente al platino Bevacizumab; Receptor de folat alfa; Càncer d'ovari resistent al platí Purpose Evaluate the antitumor activity and safety profile of the combination of mirvetuximab soravtansine and bevacizumab in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Methods Patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, whose most recent platinum-free interval was ≤6 months, were administered mirvetuximab soravtansine (6 mg/kg adjusted ideal body weight) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg), intravenously, once every 3 weeks. Eligibility included FRα expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC; ≥25% of cells with ≥2+ intensity). Prior bevacizumab and/or PARP inhibitor (PARPi) treatment were permitted. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results Ninety-four patients received combination treatment with mirvetuximab soravtansine and bevacizumab. Median age was 62 years (range, 39–81). Fifty-two percent had ≥3 prior therapies; 59% had prior bevacizumab; and 27% had prior PARPi. ORR was 44% (95% CI 33, 54) with 5 complete responses, median DOR 9.7 months (95% CI 6.9, 14.1), and median PFS 8.2 months (95% CI 6.8, 10.0). Treatment-related adverse events were consistent with the profiles of each agent, with the most common being blurred vision (all grades 57%; grade 3, 1%), diarrhea (54%; grade 3, 1%), and nausea (51%; grade 3, 1%). Conclusion The mirvetuximab soravtansine plus bevacizumab doublet is an active and well-tolerated regimen in patients with FRα-expressing platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Promising activity was observed for patients regardless of level of FRα expression or prior bevacizumab. These data underscore the potential for mirvetuximab soravtansine as the combination partner of choice for bevacizumab in this setting. This study was supported by ImmunoGen, Inc.

Physico-chemical characterization; Stress testing; Teduglutide Caracterització fisicoquímica; Proves d'estrès; Teduglutida Caracterización físicoquímica; Pruebas de estrés; Teduglutida Teduglutide (Revestive®) is a glucagon-like peptide-2 analogue used for the treatment of short bowel syndrome, a rare life-threatening condition in which the amount of functional gut is too short to enable proper absorption of nutrients and fluids. During handling prior to administration to the patient in hospital, it is possible that peptide-based medicines may be exposed to environmental stress conditions that could affect their quality. It is therefore essential to carry out stress testing studies to evaluate how such medicines respond to these stresses. For this reason, in this paper we present a strategy for a comprehensive analytical characterization of a peptide and a stress testing study in which it was subjected to various stress conditions: heating at 40 °C and 60 °C, light exposure and shaking. Several complementary analytical techniques were used throughout this study: Far UV circular dichroism, intrinsic protein fluorescence spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering, size-exclusion chromatography and intact and peptide mapping reverse-phase chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to offer an in-depth description of the chemical structure of teduglutide peptide and its physicochemical characteristics after stress stimuli were applied to the reconstituted medicine Revestive®. This study was funded by own funds from TEC01 (Ibs. Granada) and FQM-118 (University of Granada) research groups from University of Granada, and by the Hospital Paediatrics Pharmacy Unit of the Hospital Vall d’ Hebron (Barcelona, Spain), which supplied all the medicine samples. Raquel Pérez-Robles currently holds a postdoctoral position granted by the Junta de Andalucía, Spain (ref: DOC_01694). Jesús Hermosilla is currently benefiting from a research contract (Project ref: P20_01029) from the Junta de Andalucía (Spain) and European Regional Development Funds. Anabel Torrente-López is currently receiving an FPU predoctoral grant (ref.: FPU18/03131) from the Ministry of Universities, Spain. The authors would like to thank the two reviewers of this work for their feedback in revising this paper, which has resulted in a significant improvement of it. Funding for open access charge: Universidad de Granada / CBUA.

Avelumab; Cetuximab; Non–small cell lung cancer Avelumab; Cetuximab; Càncer de pulmó de cèl·lules no petites Avelumab; Cetuximab; Cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas Introduction We present the results of a phase 2a trial of first-line avelumab (anti–programmed death-ligand 1 antibody) plus cetuximab (anti–EGFR antibody) in patients with advanced squamous NSCLC. Methods Patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous NSCLC received avelumab 800 mg (d 1 and 8), cetuximab 250 mg/m2 (d 1) and 500 mg/m2 (d 8), cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (d 1), and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 (d 1 and 8) for four 3-week cycles, followed by avelumab 800 mg and cetuximab 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. The primary end point was the best overall response; the secondary end points were progression-free survival, duration of response, overall survival, and safety. Efficacy analyses were reported from an updated data cutoff. Results A total of 43 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 6.6 months for the primary analyses and 9.2 months for the efficacy analyses. In the efficacy analyses, 15 patients had a confirmed partial response (objective response rate, 34.9% [95% confidence interval: 21.0%–50.9%]), and the median duration of response was 7.1 months (95% confidence interval: 4.2–12.5 mo). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.1 months and 10.0 months, respectively. In the safety analyses (primary analysis), 38 patients (88.4%) had a treatment-related adverse event, of whom 24 (55.8%) had a grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse event. Conclusions The combination of avelumab + cetuximab and chemotherapy showed antitumor activity and tolerable safety; however, the ORR was not improved compared with those reported for current standards of care (NCT03717155). This study was sponsored by the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100009945) as part of an alliance between the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, and Pfizer. Employees of the sponsor are coauthors of this manuscript and contributed to the design, execution, interpretation of the analyses, writing the report, and the decision to submit the article for publication, along with other coauthors. We thank the patients and their families, the investigators, co-investigators, and study teams at each participating center and the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. Medical writing support was provided by Abhijith Thippeswamy of ClinicalThinking and funded by the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100009945) and Pfizer.

Crizotinib; Lorlatinib; Patient-reported outcomes Crizotinib; Lorlatinib; Resultados informados por el paciente Crizotinib; Lorlatinib; Resultats informats pel pacient Objectives Quality of life (QoL) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is negatively impacted by their disease and treatment side effects. We present detailed patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from the phase 3 CROWN study, which compared lorlatinib with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated ALK-positive advanced NSCLC. Materials and methods PROs were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire with Lung Cancer module. A longitudinal, random-intercept, random-slope, mixed-effect model assessed score changes from baseline up to (not including) end of treatment. Mean changes of absolute scores from baseline at each cycle were calculated and presented up to cycle 18 (≥ 10-point change considered clinically meaningful). Results In both lorlatinib (n = 148) and crizotinib (n = 140) arms, there were longitudinal improvements across multiple functioning and symptom scores during treatment compared with pre-treatment. Numerical improvements for most longitudinal functioning scores (physical, role, emotional, social) favored lorlatinib; cognitive functioning favored crizotinib. Numerical improvements favored lorlatinib for several symptoms (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea [clinically meaningful improvement], and cough); peripheral neuropathy favored crizotinib. Subgroup analyses showed PROs did not differ by presence/absence of baseline brain metastases. Conclusions Patients receiving first-line lorlatinib or crizotinib showed improvements and delayed deterioration in QoL, functioning, and several symptoms. Alongside the previously reported significantly longer progression-free survival and higher intracranial response rates for lorlatinib versus crizotinib, these data further support the use of lorlatinib over crizotinib in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC with/without baseline brain metastases and provide evidence of several QoL improvements with lorlatinib when used in the first-line setting. This study was sponsored by Pfizer. The study was designed by the sponsor, study investigators, and members of the steering committee. Data were collected by investigators and analyzed by the sponsor. All authors, including those employed by the sponsor of the study, contributed to the interpretation of the data and the development, writing, and approval of the manuscript. Medical writing support was funded by the sponsor. All authors had full access to the raw data in the study, and the corresponding author had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Pediatría; Resistencia antibiótica Paediatrics; Antimicrobial resistance Pediatria; Resistència antibiòtica In the past few years, antimicrobial resistance has increased, becoming a serious public health problem. The irrational use of antimicrobials is one of the main contributors to antimicrobial resistance. The paediatric population is not free from this problem, as antimicrobials are widely prescribed in this age group, often inappropriately. The introduction of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) has proven crucial in curbing the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. At the international level, the need to develop specific paediatric ASPs has been recognised on account of the differences between adult and paediatric patients as concerns infection and approaches to diagnosis and treatment. For this reason, paediatric ASPs should be multidisciplinary programmes led by paediatric infectious disease specialists and use specific paediatric indicators (such as days of treatment, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in the paediatric population, or clinical indicators) to help identify areas of improvement and develop effective targeted interventions. On the other hand, the support and leadership of the pertinent scientific societies are also essential. The purpose of this document is to present the position of the Sociedad Española de Infectología Pediátrica (SEIP, Spanish Society of Paediatric Infectious Diseases) concerning the implementation of paediatric ASPs in hospitals in Spain and to provide tools to facilitate their application in hospitals throughout the regional health care systems in the country. Durante los últimos años ha habido un aumento en la aparición de resistencias antimicrobianas, lo cual supone un grave problema de salud pública. El mal uso de antimicrobianos es un factor determinante en su desarrollo. La población pediátrica no queda exenta de dicha problemática ya que la prescripción de antibióticos en pediatría es elevada y en muchas ocasiones inadecuada. La incorporación de los programas de optimización de uso de antimicrobianos (PROA) ha resultado ser una medida crucial para disminuir el riesgo en la aparición de resistencias antibióticas. A nivel internacional se reconoce la necesidad de crear PROAs específicos en pediatría (PROA-P) debido a las diferencias existentes entre pacientes adultos y pediátricos en referencia a las infecciones, así como al abordaje tanto diagnóstico como terapéutico de las mismas. Por esta misma razón, los PROA-P deben ser programas multidisciplinares liderados por especialistas en infecciones pediátricas y trabajar con indicadores específicos pediátricos (DOT, patrones de sensibilidad antibiótica de población pediátrica, indicadores clínicos…) que permitan detectar puntos de mejora y establecer estrategias dirigidas eficaces. Por otro lado, es imprescindible el apoyo y liderazgo por parte de las distintas sociedades científicas implicadas. El objetivo de este documento es dar a conocer el posicionamiento de la Sociedad Española de Infectología Pediátrica (SEIP) sobre la implementación de los PROA pediátricos hospitalarios en nuestro territorio así como aportar herramientas que ayuden en la aplicación de dichos programas en los diferentes hospitales de las distintas regiones sanitarias del país.

Primary health care; Urinary tract infections; Urine culture Atención primaria; Infecciones del tracto urinario; Urocultivo Atenció primària; Infeccions del tracte urinari; Urocultiu Objective We assessed the impact of the implementation of a simple multifaceted intervention aimed at improving management of cystitis in primary care. Design Quality control before and after study. Site Primary care centres in Barcelona city provided by the Catalonian Institute of Health. Participants The multifaceted intervention consisted of (1) creation of a group with a leader in each of the primary care centres, out of hours services, sexual and reproductive centres, and home visit service, (2) session on management of cystitis in each centre, (3) result feedback for professionals, and (4) provision of infographics for professionals and patients with urinary tract infections. Interventions started in November 2020 and ended in the summer of 2021. Main measurements Variation in the prescription of first-line antibiotics, usage of antibiotics, and request for urine cultures before and after this intervention. Results Training sessions took place in 93% of the centres. The use of first-line therapies cystitis increased by 6.4% after the intervention (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7–7.1%). The use of nitrofurantoin in recurrent cystitis increased, mainly in out of hours service (8.7%; 95% CI, 5.2–12.2%). Urine cultures were more frequently requested after the intervention for recurrent cystitis in both primary care centres and out of hours services, with a 7.2% increase [95% CI, 5.9–8.5%), but also for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (3.1%; 95% CI, 1.8–4.4%). Conclusions A low-intensity multifaceted intervention on management of cystitis, with strong institutional support, resulted in a better choice of antibiotic in antibiotic prescribing, but the intervention had less impact on the adequacy of urine cultures. Objetivo Evaluamos el impacto de una intervención multimodal en la mejora del manejo de las cistitis en atención primaria. Diseño Estudio de calidad antes-después. Emplazamiento Centros de atención primaria de la ciudad de Barcelona proporcionados por el Institut Català de la Salut. Participantes La intervención multimodal consistió en: (1) creación de un grupo de trabajo con líderes en cada uno de los equipos de atención primaria, servicios de urgencias, centros de atención sexual y reproductiva y servicio de atención domiciliaria, (2) sesión formativa sobre el manejo de las infecciones del tracto urinario en cada centro, (3) retorno de resultados a profesionales, y (4) difusión de infografías a profesionales y pacientes. Las intervenciones comenzaron en noviembre de 2020 y finalizaron en verano de 2021. Mediciones principales Variación en la prescripción de antibióticos de primera línea, uso de antibióticos y solicitud de urocultivos antes y después de esta intervención. Resultados Las sesiones de formación se realizaron en el 93% de los centros. La selección de fármacos de primera línea en cistitis aumentó en un 6,4% después de la intervención (intervalo de confianza [IC] 95%: 5,7-7,1%). El uso de nitrofurantoína en cistitis recurrente aumentó, principalmente en servicios de urgencias (8,7%; IC 95%: 5,2-12,2%). Las solicitudes de urocultivos aumentaron después de la intervención en equipos de atención primaria y servicios de urgencias en cistitis recurrentes (7,2%; IC 95%: 5,9-8,5%), pero también en cistitis simples (3,1%; IC 95%: 1,8-4,4%). Conclusiones Una intervención multimodal de baja intensidad sobre el manejo de las cistitis junto con el apoyo institucional explícito mejoró claramente la selección de antibióticos, pero tuvo menos impacto en la adecuación de los urocultivos.

Atezolizumab; Bevacizumab; Metastatic colorectal cancer Atezolizumab; Bevacizumab; Cáncer colorrectal metastásico Atezolizumab; Bevacizumab; Càncer colorectal metastàtic Background MODUL is an adaptable, signal-seeking trial designed to test novel agents in predefined patient subgroups in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and methods Patients with measurable, unresectable, previously untreated mCRC received induction with ≤8 cycles of FOLFOX + bevacizumab followed by randomization to maintenance treatment comprising control [fluoropyrimidine (FP)/bevacizumab: 5-fluorouracil 1600-2400 mg/m2 46-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion day 1 q2 weeks plus leucovorin 400 mg/m2 2-h infusion i.v. day 1 q2 weeks or capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 b.i.d. orally days 1-14 every 21 days; bevacizumab 5 mg/kg 15-30-min i.v. infusion q2 weeks] or experimental treatment in one of four biomarker-driven cohorts. In patients with BRAF wild-type (BRAFwt) tumors (cohort 2), experimental treatment was FP/bevacizumab + atezolizumab (800 mg 60-min i.v. infusion q2 weeks). Primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS; intent-to-treat population). Enrollment is complete; efficacy and safety findings from cohort 2 are presented. Results Four hundred and forty-five patients with BRAFwt mCRC were randomized (2 : 1) to maintenance in cohort 2. At a median follow-up of 10.5 months, PFS outcome hypothesis was not met [hazard ratio (HR) 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-1.17; P = 0.48]; overall survival (OS) was immature. At a median follow-up of 20.3 months (2-year survival follow-up), PFS benefit was also not met (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.77-1.18; P = 0.666); OS HR with nearly two-thirds of patients with events was 0.83 (95% CI 0.65-1.05; P = 0.117). No new safety signals were identified. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for experimental versus control arms were hypertension (6.1% versus 4.2%), diarrhea (3.1% versus 2.1%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (1.0% versus 2.5%). Four patients experienced TEAEs with fatal outcome, two were study treatment-related: hepatic failure (experimental arm) and large intestine perforation (control arm; bevacizumab-related). Conclusions Adding atezolizumab to FP/bevacizumab as first-line maintenance treatment after FOLFOX + bevacizumab induction for BRAFwt mCRC did not improve efficacy outcomes. This work was supported by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (no grant number). The sponsor was involved in the study design and was responsible for the overall study management (monitoring), drug supply, data management, statistical analysis, and drug safety process. The Trial Master Files are maintained electronically by the sponsor. The sponsor was involved in the writing of this report, alongside the authors, all of whom had access to the raw data. The corresponding author had full access to all of the data and the final responsibility for submitting the article for publication on behalf of all authors.

Lurbinectedin; Neuroendocrine tumours; Small cell Lurbinectedina; Tumores neuroendocrinos; Célula pequeña Lurbinectedina; Tumors neuroendocrins; Cèl·lula petita Background Patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) need alternative therapies after failure of first-line therapy. Patients and methods This phase II trial evaluated lurbinectedin, a selective inhibitor of oncogenic transcription, at 3.2 mg/m2 as a 1-h intravenous infusion every 3 weeks in 32 NETs patients treated in the second- or third-line setting. The primary efficacy endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1 assessed by the investigators. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results Two of 31 evaluable patients had confirmed partial responses (ORR = 6.5%; 95%CI, 0.8–21.4%). Median DoR was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.0–5.4 months), median PFS was 1.4 months (95% CI, 1.2–3.0 months) and median OS was 7.4 months (95% CI, 3.4–16.2 months). Lurbinectedin showed an acceptable, predictable and manageable safety profile. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (40.6%; grade 4, 12.4%; febrile neutropenia, 3.1%). Conclusions Considering the exploratory aim of this trial that evaluated a heterogeneous population of NETs patients, and the signs of antitumour activity observed (two confirmed partial responses and seven long disease stabilisations), further development of lurbinectedin is warranted in a more selected NETs population.

Insuficiencia cardíaca; Función ventricular; Tratamiento farmacológico; Atención primaria de salud Insuficiència cardíaca; Funció ventricular; Tractament farmacològic; Atenció primària de salut Heart failure; Ventricular function; Pharmacotherapy; Primary health care Despite better diagnoses and treatments, heart failure (HF) is an important cause of death in Spain. The objective of this study is to describe the characteristics and treatment of a population with chronic HF classified according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Population-based observational cohort study in Primary Health Care. Catalonia, Spain, during 2014–2018. Adults with HF classified by the LVEF. Analysis of electronic health data registered in SIDIAP (Information System for Research in Primary Care). Demographics, LVEF, comorbidities, and use of drugs for HF. 10,130 patients were included; 18.9% with LVEF

Castration-resistant prostate cancer; Metformin; Overall survival Càncer de pròstata resistent a la castració; Metformina; Supervivència global Cáncer de próstata resistente a la castración; Metformina; Supervivencia global Background: Statins and metformin are commonly prescribed for patients, including those with prostate cancer. Preclinical and epidemiologic studies of each agent have suggested anti-cancer properties. Methods: Patient data from three randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III studies evaluating enzalutamide (AFFIRM, PREVAIL and PROSPER) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer were included in this analysis. This post hoc, retrospective study examined the association of statin and metformin on radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), toxicity and overall survival (OS). After adjusting for available clinical prognostic variables, multivariate analyses were performed on pooled data from AFFIRM and PREVAIL, all three trials pooled, and each trial individually, to assess differential efficacy in these end-points associated with the baseline use of these medications. Results: In the multivariate analysis of the individual trials, OS and rPFS/MFS were not significantly influenced by statin or metformin use in AFFIRM or PROSPER. However, in PREVAIL, OS was significantly influenced by statin (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.89) and rPFS was significantly influenced by metformin (HR, 0.48; 95% CI 0.34-0.70). In pooled analyses, improved OS was significantly associated with statin use but not metformin use for AFFIRM+PREVAIL trials (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.72-0.96) and AFFIRM+PREVAIL+PROSPER (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.66-0.85). Conclusions: The association between statin or metformin use and rPFS, MFS and OS was inconsistent across three trials. Analyses of all three trials pooled and AFFIRM+PREVAIL pooled revealed that statin but not metformin use was significantly associated with a reduced risk of death in enzalutamide-treated patients. Additional prospective, controlled studies are warranted. This study was sponsored by Pfizer Inc. (New York, NY, USA) and Astellas Pharma, Inc. (Northbrook, IL, USA), the co-developers of enzalutamide. Medical writing and editorial support funded by the sponsors were provided by Stephanie Vadasz, PhD, and Dena McWain of Ashfield MedComms (an Ashfield Health company), Lauren Rainer, BSc, and Julie B. Stimmel, PhD, of Onyx (a Prime Global agency).

Glomeruloesclerosi; COVID-19 Glomerulosclerosis; COVID-19 Glomeruloesclerosis; COVID-19

Immunotherapy; Pembrolizumab; Quality of life Inmunoterapia; Pembrolizumab; Calidad de vida Immunoteràpia; Pembrolizumab; Qualitat de vida Objectives To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with first-line pembrolizumab, pembrolizumab-chemotherapy, or cetuximab-chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) in the phase 3 KEYNOTE-048 trial (NCT02358031). Materials and Methods HRQoL was measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-question quality-of-life (EORTC QLQ-C30), the EORTC 35-question quality-of-life head and neck cancer–specific module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35), and the EuroQol 5-dimension 3-level instruments (EQ-5D-3L). Secondary endpoints included mean change from baseline in EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) at week 15 and time to deterioration (TTD) in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain and swallowing. Results Of 882 enrolled participants, 844 received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment and completed ≥ 1 HRQoL assessment; adherence was ≥ 79% at week 15 across treatment groups. At week 15, EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL scores remained stable; no clinically meaningful between-group differences were observed (least squares mean difference, pembrolizumab vs cetuximab-chemotherapy, 0.24; 95% CI, −3.34 to 3.82; pembrolizumab-chemotherapy vs cetuximab-chemotherapy, 0.40; 95% CI, −3.46 to 4.26). Median TTD in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain and swallowing scores was not reached over 51 weeks across groups, showing stable HRQoL. TTD was similar between groups for EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL (pembrolizumab vs cetuximab-chemotherapy: HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.95–2.00; pembrolizumab-chemotherapy vs cetuximab-chemotherapy: HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.94–2.00), as was TTD in EORTC QLQ-H&N35 pain and swallowing scores. Conclusions Pembrolizumab monotherapy and pembrolizumab-chemotherapy extended OS while maintaining HRQoL, further supporting first-line use for R/M HNSCC. Funding for this research was provided by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

COVID-19 pandemic; Direct-acting antivirals; Telemedicine Pandemia de COVID-19; Antivirales de acción directa; Telemedicina Pandèmia del Covid-19; Antivirals d'acció directa; Telemedicina Abstract Background and objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic imperiled the global health system. We aimed to determine the impact of COVID-19 on the care continuum of HCV-infected patients. Material and Methods: Two hundred and fifty-six patients who were prescribed a course of DAA therapy at three tertiary medical centers in the US and China between January 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020 were included. We assessed the proportions of patients who completed DAA therapy and had HCV RNA testing during and after the end of therapy. We also assessed the impact of utilization of telemedicine. Results: The proportion of patients undergoing HCV RNA testing during DAA treatment decreased from >81.7% before pandemic to 67.8% during the pandemic (P=0.006), with a more prominent decrease in the US. There were significant decreases in HCV RNA testing >12 (P20 weeks (P

Transgénero; Terapia hormonal cruzada; Identidad de género Transgender; Hormone cross therapy; Gender identity Transgènere; Teràpia hormonal creuada; Identitat de gènere Some people, including minors, have a gender identity that does not correspond to the sex assigned at birth. They are known as trans* people, which is an umbrella term that encompasses transgender, transsexual, and other identities not conforming to the assigned gender. Healthcare units for trans* minors require multidisciplinary working, undertaken by personnel expert in gender identity, enabling, when requested, interventions for the minor and their social–familial environment, in an individualized and flexible way during the gender affirmation path. This service model also includes hormonal treatments tailored as much as possible to the individual's needs, beyond the dichotomic goals of a traditional binary model. This guide addresses the general aspects of professional care of trans* minors and presents the current evidence-based protocol of hormonal treatments for trans* and non-binary adolescents. In addition, it details key aspects related to expected body changes and their possible side effects, as well as prior counselling about fertility preservation. Algunas personas, también las menores de edad, tienen una identidad de género que no se corresponde con el sexo asignado al nacer. Se les conoce como personas trans*, que es el término paraguas que engloba transgénero, transexual y otras identidades no conformes con el género asignado. Las unidades de asistencia sanitaria a menores trans* requieren un trabajo multidisciplinario, realizado por personal experto en identidad de género, que permita, cuando así lo soliciten, intervenciones para el menor y su entorno sociofamiliar, de forma individualizada y flexible durante el camino de afirmación de género. Este modelo de servicio también incluye tratamientos hormonales adaptados en la medida de lo posible a las necesidades del individuo, más allá de los objetivos dicotómicos de un modelo binario tradicional. Esta guía aborda los aspectos generales de la atención profesional de menores trans* y presenta el protocolo actual basado en evidencia de tratamientos hormonales para adolescentes trans* y no binarios. Además, detalla aspectos clave relacionados con los cambios corporales esperados y sus posibles efectos secundarios, así como el asesoramiento previo sobre preservación de la fertilidad.

Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease of the joints that has been associated with variation in the peripheral blood methylome. In this study, we aim to identify epigenetic variation that is associated with the response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) therapy. & nbsp; Methods Peripheral blood genome-wide DNA methylation profiles were analyzed in a discovery cohort of 62 RA patients at baseline and at week 12 of TNFi therapy. DNA methylation of individual CpG sites and enrichment of biological pathways were evaluated for their association with drug response. Using a novel cell deconvolution approach, altered DNA methylation associated with TNFi response was also tested in the six main immune cell types in blood. Validation of the results was performed in an independent longitudinal cohort of 60 RA patients. & nbsp; Findings Treatment with TNFi was associated with significant longitudinal peripheral blood methylation changes in biological pathways related to RA (FDR < 0.05). 139 biological functions were modified by therapy, with methylation levels changing systematically towards a signature similar to that of healthy controls. Differences in the methylation profile of T cell activation and differentiation, GTPase-mediated signaling, and actin filament organization pathways were associated with the clinical response to therapy. Cell type deconvolution analysis identified CpG sites in CD4 +T, NK, neutrophils and monocytes that were significantly associated with the response to TNFi. & nbsp; Interpretation Our results show that treatment with TNFi restores homeostatic blood methylation in RA. The clinical response to TNFi is associated to methylation variation in specific biological pathways, and it involves cells from both the innate and adaptive immune systems.& nbsp; & nbsp; Copyright (c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) Superscript/Subscript Available

Background Biomarkers predicting second-generation novel hormonal therapy (NHT) benefit relative to taxanes are critical for optimized treatment decisions for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. These associations have not been reported simultaneously for common mCRPC genomic biomarkers. Objective To evaluate predictive associations of common genomic aberrations in mCRPC using an established comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) system. Design, setting, and participants A retrospective cohort study used data from a deidentified US-based clinicogenomic database comprising patients treated in routine clinical practice between 2011 and 2020, evaluated with Foundation Medicine CGP in tissue biopsies obtained around the time of treatment decision. The main cohort included 180 NHT and 179 taxane lines of therapy (LOTs) from 308 unique patients. The sequential cohort comprised a subset of the main cohort NHT LOTs immediately followed by taxane from 55 unique patients. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Main cohort analyses were adjusted for known treatment assignment biases via inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) in treatment interaction models. Results and limitations In the main cohort, patients with AR amplification (ARamp) or PTEN aberrations (PTENalt) had worse relative PSA response on NHT versus taxanes compared with patients without. Patients with ARamp, PTENalt, or RB1 aberrations (RB1alt) also had worse relative TTNT and OS on NHT but not on taxanes. In multivariable models for TTNT and OS adjusted via IPTW, ARamp, PTENalt, and RB1alt were shown as poor prognostic factors overall and demonstrated significant treatment interactions, indicating reduced hazards of therapy switch and death on taxanes versus NHT. Consistent associations favoring increased benefit from subsequent taxane despite prior NHT treatment line were observed only for ARamp in the sequential cohort, in which very few patients had RB1alt for assessment. Conclusions ARamp status is a candidate biomarker to predict poor effectiveness of NHT relative to taxanes in mCRPC in scenarios where both options are considered. Patient summary Specific alterations in the DNA of tumors may assist in choosing between novel oral hormonal therapies and standard chemotherapy in advanced prostate cancer patients.

Esclerosis múltiple; Brote; Resonancia magnética Esclerosi múltiple; Brot; Imatge per ressonància magnètica Multiple sclerosis; Outbreak; Magnetic resonance imaging Objective To study the clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse by analyzing the number and location of gadolinium-enhanced (Gd+) lesions on brain MRI before methylprednisolone (MP) treatment. Methods We analyzed brain MRI from 90 relapsed MS patients in two Phase IV multicenter double-blind randomized clinical trials that showed the noninferiority of different routes and doses of MP administration. A 1.5- or 3-T brain MRI was performed at baseline before MP treatment and within 15 days of symptom onset. The number and location of Gd+ lesions were analyzed. Associations were studied using univariate analysis. Results Sixty-two percent of patients had at least 1 Gd+ brain lesion; the median number was 1 (interquartile range 0–4), and 41% of patients had 2 or more lesions. The most frequent location of Gd+ lesions was subcortical (41.4%). Gd+ brain lesions were found in 71.4% of patients with brainstem-cerebellum symptoms, 57.1% with spinal cord symptoms and 55.5% with optic neuritis (ON). Thirty percent of patients with brain symptoms did not have Gd+ lesions, and only 43.6% of patients had symptomatic Gd+ lesions. The univariate analysis showed a negative correlation between age and the number of Gd+ lesions (p = 0.002). Conclusion Most patients with relapse showed several Gd+ lesions on brain MRI, even when the clinical manifestation was outside of the brain. Our findings illustrate the clinico-radiological paradox in MS relapse and support the value of brain MRI in this scenario. Objetivo Estudiar la paradoja clínico-radiológica en el brote de la esclerosis múltiple (EM) mediante el análisis de lesiones captantes de gadolinio (Gd+) en la RM cerebral antes del tratamiento con metilprednisolona (MP). Métodos Analizamos la RM cerebral basal de 90 pacientes con EM en brote de 2 ensayos clínicos aleatorizados multicéntricos fase IV que demostraron la no inferioridad de diferentes vías y dosis de MP, realizadas antes del tratamiento con MP y en los 15 días siguientes a la aparición de los síntomas. Se analizaron el número y la localización de las lesiones Gd+. Se estudiaron las asociaciones mediante análisis univariado. Resultados El 62% de los pacientes tenía al menos una lesión Gd+ cerebral y el 41% de los pacientes tenía 2 o más lesiones. La localización más frecuente fue la subcortical (41,4%). Se encontraron lesiones Gd+ cerebrales en el 71,4% de los pacientes con síntomas de tronco cerebral o cerebelo, en el 57,1% con síntomas medulares y en el 55,5% con neuritis óptica. El 30% de los pacientes con síntomas cerebrales no tenían lesiones Gd+ y sólo el 4,.6% de los pacientes tenían lesiones Gd+ sintomáticas. El análisis univariante mostró una correlación negativa entre la edad y el número de lesiones Gd+ (p = 0,002). Conclusiones La mayoría de los pacientes en brote mostraron varias lesiones Gd+ en la RM cerebral, incluso cuando la manifestación clínica fue medular u óptica. Nuestros hallazgos ilustran la paradoja clínico-radiológica en el brote de la EM y apoyan el valor de la RM cerebral en este escenario. This work was supported in part by the Ministry of Health of Spain (grant numbers EC07/90278 and EC11/132) and personal grant Rio Hortega CM19/00042 to LMA.

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with a 5-year relative survival of 14% in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients with BRAF V600E mutations, which occur in ∼10%-15% of patients with mCRC, have a poorer prognosis compared with those with wild-type BRAF tumours. The combination of the BRAF inhibitor encorafenib with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab currently represents the only chemotherapy-free targeted therapy approved in the USA and Europe for previously treated patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC. As a class, BRAF inhibitors are associated with dermatologic, gastrointestinal, and renal events, as well as pyrexia and secondary skin malignancies. Adverse event (AE) profiles of specific BRAF inhibitors vary, however, and are affected by the specific agents given in combination. In patients with mCRC, commonly reported AEs of cetuximab monotherapy include infusion reactions and dermatologic toxicities. Data from the phase III BEACON CRC study indicate that the combination of encorafenib with cetuximab has a distinct safety profile. Here we review the most frequently reported AEs that occurred with this combination in BEACON CRC and best practices for managing and mitigating AEs that require more than standard supportive care., Highlights • Encorafenib + cetuximab has a distinct safety profile in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer. • Effective management strategies can mitigate the impact of AEs, prolonging treatment duration and benefits. • We provide guidance on managing gastrointestinal, skin, and renal AEs. • Specific guidance is given for the management of arthralgia, myalgia, fatigue, asthenia, headache, and pyrexia.

Background: This study assessed the checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor prexasertib in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). Patients and Methods: This was a parallel-cohort phase II study of 105 mg/m2 prexasertib once every 14 days for patients who progressed after no more than two prior therapies and had platinum-sensitive (Cohort 1) or platinum-resistant/platinum-refractory (Cohort 2) disease. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory endpoints included biomarker identification and assessment of an alternative regimen (Cohort 3: 40 mg/m2 days 1-3, 14-day cycle). Results: In Cohort 1 (n = 58), ORR was 5.2%; DCR, 31%; median PFS, 1.41 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.64); and median OS, 5.42 months (95% CI, 3.75-8.51). In Cohort 2 (n = 60), ORR was 0%; DCR, 20%; median PFS, 1.36 months (95% CI, 1.25-1.45); and median OS, 3.15 months (95% CI, 2.27-5.52). The most frequent all-grade, related, treatment-emergent adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (Cohort 1, 69.6%; Cohort 2, 73.3%), decreased platelet count (Cohort 1, 51.8%; Cohort 2, 50.0%), decreased white blood cell count (Cohort 1, 28.6%; Cohort 2, 40.0%), and anemia (Cohort 1, 39.3%; Cohort 2, 28.3%). Eleven patients (19.6%) in Cohort 1 and one patient (1.7%) in Cohort 2 experienced grade ?3 febrile neutropenia. Prexasertib pharmacokinetics were consistent with prior studies. Cohort 3 outcomes were similar to those of Cohorts 1 and 2. No actionable biomarkers were identified. Conclusion: Prexasertib did not demonstrate activity to warrant future development as monotherapy in ED-SCLC. © 2021 The Authors Boehringer Ingelheim; Amgen; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly and Company; Pfizer; Astellas Pharma US; AstraZeneca; Merck; Novartis; Roche; AbbVie; University of Michigan; Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A.; Merck Sharp and Dohme; PTC Therapeutics; TG Therapeutics; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research; Bayer Fund; National Institute for Health Research; European Commission; Daiichi-Sankyo; Oryzon Genomics; Otsuka Pharmaceutical; UCLH Biomedical Research Centre We thank the patients who participated in this trial and the study coordinators, nurses, nurse practitioners, clinical research assistants, and doctors who assisted with the research. The authors also thank Erin Wagner from BioStat Solutions, Inc., for statistical support and Lisa Golden, Rod Decker, and Elizabeth Spoljoric for their input and contributions to the study. MDF is supported by the University College London/University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH) National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre and runs early phase studies in the NIHR UCLH Clinical Research Facility supported by the University College London Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre. Eli Lilly and Company contracted with Syneos Health for writing support provided by Andrea D. Humphries, PhD, and editing support provided by Noelle Gasco. L.A. Byers reports receiving research funding and fees as an advisor or consultant from AstraZeneca, GenMab, and Sierra Oncology; research funding from Tolero Pharmaceuticals; and fees as an advisor or consultant from Bristol Myers Squibb, Althia, Merck, Pfizer, PharmaMar, AbbVie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, and Debiopharm Group. A. Navarro reports receiving fees as an advisor or consultant from Pfizer and Boehringer Ingelheim; fees from Roche and AstraZeneca speakers’ bureaus; fees for expert testimony from Oryzon Genomics and MedSIR; and fees or reimbursement for travel, accommodations, or other expenses from Roche, Pfizer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. M. Johnson reports grant funding to her institution from Eli Lilly and Company, Abbvie, Acerta, Adaptimmune, Amgen, Apexigen, Arcus Biosciences, Array BioPharma, Artios Pharma, AstraZeneca, Atreca, BeiGene, BerGenBio, Boehringer Ingelheim, Calithera Biosciences, Checkpoint Therapeutics, Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Curis, CytomX, Daiichi Sankyo, Dracen Pharmaceuticals, Dynavax, EMD Serono, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Genocea Biosciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Gritstone Oncology, Guardant Health, Harpoon, Hengrui Therapeutics, Immunocore, Incyte, Janssen, Jounce Therapeutics, Kadmon Pharmaceuticals, Loxo Oncology, Lycera, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, Neovia Onclogy, Novartis, OncoMed Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, PMV Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Ribon Therapeutics, Rubius Therapeutics, Sanofi, Seven and Eight Biopharmaceuticals/Birdie Biopharmaceuticals, Shattuck Labs, Silicon Therapeutics, Stem CentRx, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Tarveda, TCR2 Therapeutics, TMUNITY Therapeutics, University of Michigan, and WindMIL; receiving fees for consulting services from Eli Lilly and Company, Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Atreca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Calithera Biosciences, Checkpoint Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, EMD Serono, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Gritstone Oncology, Guardant Health, Incyte, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, Ribon Therapeutics, Sanofi, WindMIL, Achilles Therapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, G1 Therapeutics, and Association of Community Cancer Centers; and receiving fees for consulting services performed by her spouse from Astellas and Otsuka Pharmaceuticals. K.H. Dragnev reports funding to the institution for the conduct of the trial from Eli Lilly and Company and support to the institution for conduct of company-sponsored trials from Merck, Roche/Genentech, G1 Therapeutics, Io Therapeutics, and Novartis. S. McNeely reports receiving personal fees and non-financial support from Eli Lilly and Company. A.B. Lin and spouse are both employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company. M. Forster reports receiving educational grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme for the EACH study and the POPPY study, from Boehringer Ingelheim for the DARWIN1 study, and from AstraZeneca for the ORCA2 study, as well as fees for advisory and consultancy work from Achilles, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Nanobiotix, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmamar, Roche, Takeda, Bayer, and Guardant Advisory. The remaining authors have stated that they have no conflicts of interest.

Background: The pivotal phase III ASCENT trial demonstrated improved survival outcomes associated with sacituzumab govitecan (SG), an anti-trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (anti-Trop-2) antibody-drug conjugate linked with the topoisomerase-inhibitor SN-38, over single-agent chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). This prespecified, exploratory biomarker analysis from the ASCENT trial evaluates the association between tumor Trop-2 expression and germline BRCA1/2 mutation status with clinical outcomes. Patients and methods: Patients with mTNBC refractory to or progressing after two or more prior chemotherapies, with one or more in the metastatic setting, were randomized to receive SG (10 mg/kg intravenously days 1 and 8, every 21 days) or TPC (capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine) until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Biopsy or surgical specimens were collected at study entry to determine Trop-2 expression level using a validated immunohistochemistry assay and histochemical scoring. Germline BRCA1/2 mutation status was collected at baseline. Results: Of 468 assessable patients, 290 had Trop-2 expression data [64% (n = 151 SG) versus 60% (n = 139 TPC)] and 292 had known BRCA1/2 mutation status [63% (n = 149 SG) versus 61% (n = 143 TPC)]. Median progression-free survival in SG- versus TPC-treated patients was 6.9, 5.6, and 2.7 months versus 2.5, 2.2, and 1.6 months for high, medium, and low Trop-2 expression, respectively. Median overall survival (14.2, 14.9, and 9.3 months versus 6.9, 6.9, and 7.6 months) and objective response rates (44%, 38%, and 22% versus 1%, 11%, and 6%) were numerically higher with SG versus TPC in patients with high, medium, and low Trop-2 expression, respectively. Efficacy outcomes were numerically higher with SG versus TPC in patients with and without germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Conclusions: SG benefits patients with previously treated mTNBC expressing high/medium Trop-2 compared with standard-of-care chemotherapy and regardless of germline BRCA1/2 mutation status. The small number of patients with low Trop-2 expression precludes definitive conclusions on the benefit of SG in this subgroup., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Background In the randomised phase III KEYNOTE-062 study, pembrolizumab was non-inferior to chemotherapy for overall survival in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive [combined positive score (CPS) ≥1] advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. We present findings of prespecified health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) analyses for pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in this population. Materials and methods HRQOL, a secondary endpoint, was measured in patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment and completed ≥1 HRQOL questionnaire [European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30-question quality-of-life (QLQ-C30), EORTC 22-question quality-of-life gastric-cancer-specific module (QLQ-STO22)]. Least squares mean (LSM) change (baseline to week 18) in global health status/quality of life (GHS/QOL; EORTC QLQ-C30) and time to deterioration (TTD) in GHS/QOL, nausea/vomiting and appetite loss scores (EORTC QLQ-C30) and abdominal pain/discomfort scores (EORTC QLQ-STO22) were evaluated. Results The HRQOL population comprised 495 patients with CPS ≥1 (pembrolizumab, 252; chemotherapy, 243). Compliance rates at week 18 were similar for pembrolizumab and chemotherapy (EORTC QLQ-C30, 87.9% and 81.9%; EORTC QLQ-STO22, 87.9% and 81.3%, respectively). There was no between-arm difference in LSM score change in GHS/QOL [−0.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) −5.01 to 4.69; P = 0.948]. The LSM score change for most subscales showed comparable worsening in both arms. TTD for GHS/QOL [hazard ratio (HR), 0.96; 95% CI, 0.67-1.38; P = 0.826], appetite loss (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.58-1.20; P = 0.314) and pain (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.78-1.91; P = 0.381) were similar between arms. Longer TTD was observed for pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for nausea/vomiting (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44-0.85; P = 0.003). Conclusions HRQOL was maintained with first-line treatment with pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1–positive advanced gastric/GEJ cancer and was similar between pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in this population., Highlights • HRQOL was similar between pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-positive advanced gastric/GEJ cancer. • General HRQOL as measured by QLQ-C30 GHS/QOL scores was comparable between treatment arms from baseline to week 18. • The EQ-5D-3L visual analogue scale was also equivalent between arms from baseline to week 18.

BRAF mutation; Metastatic colorectal cancer; Prognostic markers Mutación BRAF; Cáncer colorrectal metastásico; Marcadores pronósticos Mutació BRAF; Càncer colorectal metastàtic; Marcadors pronòstics Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is still a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States and worldwide, despite recent improvements in cancer management. CRC, like many malignancies, is a heterogeneous disease, with subtypes characterized by genetic alterations. One common mutation in CRC is in the BRAF gene (most commonly V600E substitution). This occurs in ∼10% of patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) and is a marker of poor prognosis. Design Herein, we review the clinical and translational literature on the role of the BRAF V600E mutation in the pathogenesis of mCRC, its mechanisms as a prognostic marker, and its potential utility as a predictive marker of treatment response. We then summarize the current evidence-based recommendations for management of BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC, with a focus on recent clinical research advances in this setting. Results The current standard therapies for first-line treatment of BRAF-mutated mCRC are chemotherapy with bevacizumab as well as 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) plus bevacizumab in patients with a good performance status. Combination strategies involving mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway blockade have shown promising results for the treatment of patients with BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC. The Binimetinib, Encorafenib, And Cetuximab cOmbiNed to treat BRAF-mutant ColoRectal Cancer (BEACON CRC) study represents the largest study in this population to date and has given strong clinical evidence to support BRAF and epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition with the combination of encorafenib plus cetuximab. Conclusions The treatment of BRAF-mutated mCRC has evolved rapidly over the last several years. Recently, combination strategies involving MAPK pathway blockade have shown promising results in BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC, and other potential targets continue to be explored. In addition, a greater understanding of the role of BRAF V600E mutation in the pathogenesis of CRC should also continue to fuel advances in the management of patients with mCRC harboring this genetic aberration. This work was supported by Array BioPharma, which was acquired by Pfizer in July 2019 (no grant number).

Chemotherapy; Mirvetuximab soravtansine; Ovarian cancer Quimioterapia; Mirvetuximab soravtansina; Cáncer de ovarios Quimioteràpia; Mirvetuximab soravtansina; Càncer d'ovaris Background Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV) is an antibody-drug conjugate comprising a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-binding antibody, cleavable linker, and the maytansinoid DM4, a potent tubulin-targeting agent. The randomized, open-label, phase III study FORWARD I compared MIRV and investigator's choice chemotherapy in patients with platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients and methods Eligible patients with 1-3 prior lines of therapy and whose tumors were positive for FRα expression were randomly assigned, in a 2 : 1 ratio, to receive MIRV (6 mg/kg, adjusted ideal body weight) or chemotherapy (paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival [PFS, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, blinded independent central review] in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and in the prespecified FRα high population. Results A total of 366 patients were randomized; 243 received MIRV and 109 received chemotherapy. The primary endpoint, PFS, did not reach statistical significance in either the ITT [hazard ratio (HR), 0.98, P = 0.897] or the FRα high population (HR, 0.69, P = 0.049). Superior outcomes for MIRV over chemotherapy were observed in all secondary endpoints in the FRα high population including improved objective response rate (24% versus 10%), CA-125 responses (53% versus 25%), and patient-reported outcomes (27% versus 13%). Fewer treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events (25.1% versus 44.0%), and fewer events leading to dose reduction (19.8% versus 30.3%) and treatment discontinuation (4.5% versus 8.3%) were seen with MIRV compared with chemotherapy. Conclusions In patients with platinum-resistant EOC, MIRV did not result in a significant improvement in PFS compared with chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints consistently favored MIRV, particularly in patients with high FRα expression. MIRV showed a differentiated and more manageable safety profile than chemotherapy. This work was supported by ImmunoGen, Inc (no grant number).

To our knowledge, there are no reports of status epilepticus (SE) associated with mitochondrial diseases and treated with perampanel (PER). We present three cases of patients with refractory SE associated with MELAS syndrome who responded favorably to PER. All cases were diagnosed as non-convulsive SE (focal without impairment of level of consciousness). After an initial treatment with other anti-seizure drugs, PER was added in all cases (8, 16 and 12 mg) and cessation of SE was observed within the next 4-8 hours. All the cases involved a stroke-like lesion present on brain MRI. In our patients, PER was an effective option in SE associated with MELAS syndrome., Highlights • Status epilepticus (SE) in MELAS is associated with a stroke-lesion and it is usually refractory. • We present three cases of refractory SE and MELAS who responded favorably to Perampanel. • Perampanel (PER) may be an effective option in SE associated with MELAS syndrome.

Introduction:Remdesivir has demonstrated antiviral activity against coronavirus, shortening the time torecovery in adults hospitalized with moderate/severe COVID-19. Severe adverse events such as acutekidney injury have been reported. Scant data are available on the use and safety of remdesivir in kidneytransplant recipients.Methods:We present a multicenter cohort study of 51 kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 treatedwith remdesivir. Outcomes and safety were assessed.Results:Mean age at diagnosis was 60 years, with a median time since kidney transplant of 4.5years. Mean time since admission to remdesivir was 2 days. Twenty-eight patients (54.9%) requiredmechanical ventilation (19 noninvasive). Mortality was 18.9% and markedly higher if aged$65 years(45% vs. 3.2% in younger patients). Acute kidneyinjury was present in 27.7% of patients, but wasdiagnosed in 50% before treatment. No patients required remdesivir discontinuation because ofadverse events. We did notfind significant hepatoxicity or systemicsymptoms resulting from thedrug. Conclusion:In our cohort of kidney transplant recipients, remdesivir was well tolerated and safe in renaland hepatic toxicity, but randomized trials are needed to assess its efficacy. The authors are indebted to the many physicians andnurses who take care of these patients and are facing theCOVID-19 pandemic in our country. This research wassupported by Rio Hortega contract CM19/00004 (ISCIII)(AB), and RD16/0009/0013 (ISCIII FEDER RedinRen). MJP-S is supported by a Spanish Society of Transplantscholarship

Background: This study evaluated efficacy and safety of palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, in heavilypretreated hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/ HER2(-)) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients during the compassionate use program in Spain from February 2015 to November 2017. Patients and methods: Patient data were collected retrospectively from 35 hospitals in Spain. Patients with HR+/HER2(-) mBC who had progressed on >= 4 treatments for advanced disease were eligible. Results: A total of 219 patients received palbociclib in combination with aromatase inhibitors (110; 50.2%), fulvestrant (87; 39.7%), tamoxifen (8; 3.6%) or as single agent (10; 4.6%). Mean age of the patients was 58 years; 31 patients (16.1%) were premenopausal and 162 (83.9%) were postmenopausal at the beginning of treatment with palbociclib. Patients had received a median of 3 previous lines of endocrine therapy (ET) for advanced disease. Real-world tumor response (rwTR) and clinical benefit rate were 5.9% (n = 13) and 46.2% (n = 101), respectively. The median real world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was 6.0 months (95% CI 5.7-7.0) and the median overall survival was 19.0 months (95% CI 16.4-21.7). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant difference in median rwPFS in patients treated with palbociclib plus fulvestrant depending on the duration of prior treatment with fulvestrant monotherapy (>6 versus, This study was sponsored by Biomedical Research Foundation of the Hospital Clinico San Carlos (Madrid, Spain). The study was funded by an investigator sponsored research grant (WI236789) from Pfizer.

Càncer de coll uterí; Assaig clínic; Mutant HER2 Cáncer de cuello uterino; Ensayo clínico; Mutante HER2 Cervical cancer; Clinical trial; HER2 mutant Objective: Somatic HER2 mutations occur in ~5% of cervical cancers and are considered oncogenic and associated with poor prognosis. Neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is active in multiple HER2-mutant cancers. SUMMIT is a phase II basket trial investigating the efficacy and safety of neratinib in solid tumors. Methods: Patients with HER2-mutant, persistent, metastatic/recurrent cervical cancer with disease progression after platinum-based treatment for advanced/recurrent disease received oral neratinib 240 mg/day with mandatory loperamide prophylaxis during cycle 1. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included: response duration (DOR); clinical benefit rate (CBR); progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS); safety. Results: Sixteen eligible patients were enrolled; 10 (62.5%) had endocervical adenocarcinoma. The most common HER2 mutation was S310F (63% of patients). Three of 12 RECIST-measurable patients had confirmed partial responses (ORR 25%; 95%CI 5.5-57.2%); 3 had stable disease ≥16 weeks (CBR 50%; 95%CI 21.1-78.9%). DOR for responders were 5.6, 5.9, and 12.3 months. Median PFS was 7.0 months (95%CI 0.7-18.3 months); median OS was 16.8 months (95%CI 4.1-NE months). Diarrhea (75%), nausea (44%), and decreased appetite (38%) were the most common adverse events. One patient (6%) reported grade 3 diarrhea. There were no grade 4 events, and no diarrhea-related treatment discontinuations. Conclusions: Neratinib monotherapy showed evidence of activity in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-mutant cervical cancer, with no new safety signals. Given the few effective options for cervical cancer after platinum-based therapy failure, neratinib warrants further investigation in this molecularly defined patient population. This work was supported by Puma Biotechnology Inc . 10880 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 2150, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.

Biomarcadors; Immunoteràpia; Microambient tumoral Biomarcadores; Inmunoterapia; Microambiente tumoral Biomarkers; Immunotherapy; Tumor microenvironment Transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ) is a pleiotropic cytokine that plays a key role in both physiologic and pathologic conditions, including cancer. Importantly, TGFβ can exhibit both tumor-suppressive and oncogenic functions. In normal epithelial cells TGFβ acts as an antiproliferative and differentiating factor, whereas in advanced tumors TGFβ can act as an oncogenic factor by creating an immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment, and inducing cancer cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, tumor progression, and metastatic spread. A wealth of preclinical findings have demonstrated that targeting TGFβ is a promising means of exerting antitumor activity. Based on this rationale, several classes of TGFβ inhibitors have been developed and tested in clinical trials, namely, monoclonal, neutralizing, and bifunctional antibodies; antisense oligonucleotides; TGFβ-related vaccines; and receptor kinase inhibitors. It is now >15 years since the first clinical trial testing an anti-TGFβ agent was engaged. Despite the promising preclinical studies, translation of the basic understanding of the TGFβ oncogenic response into the clinical setting has been slow and challenging. Here, we review the conclusions and status of all the completed and ongoing clinical trials that test compounds that inhibit the TGFβ pathway, and discuss the challenges that have arisen during their clinical development. With none of the TGFβ inhibitors evaluated in clinical trials approved for cancer therapy, clinical development for TGFβ blockade therapy is primarily oriented toward TGFβ inhibitor combinations. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are considered candidates, albeit with efficacy anticipated to be restricted to specific populations. In this context, we describe current efforts in the search for biomarkers for selecting the appropriate cancer patients who are likely to benefit from anti-TGFβ therapies. The knowledge accumulated during the last 15 years of clinical research in the context of the TGFβ pathway is crucial to design better, innovative, and more successful trials. The authors acknowledge Asociación Española contra el Cáncer (AECC), Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS) Instituto de Salud Carlos III grant [grant number PI19/00318], Fundación Areces, Fundación BBVA, Fundación Catalunya La Pedrera, and Cellex support.

Atrial fibrillation; Oral anticoagulants; Adherence; Persistence; Electronic health records Fibrilación auricular; Tratamiento anticoagulante oral; Adherencia; Persistencia; Registros electrónicos de salud Fibril·lació auricular; Tractament anticoagulant oral; Adherència; Persistència; Registres electrònics de salut Objective: We aimed to describe sociodemographic, comorbidities, co-medication and risk of thromboembolic events and bleeding in patients with NVAF initiating oral anticoagulants (OAC) for stroke prevention, and to estimate adherence and persistence to OAC. Setting: Primary Health Care (PHC) in the Catalan Health Institute (ICS), Catalunya, Spain. Participants: All NVAF adult patients initiating OAC for stroke prevention in August 2013---December 2015. Methods: Population-based cohort study. Persistence was measured in patients initiating OAC in August 2013---December 2014. Data source: SIDIAP, which captures electronic health records from PHC in the (ICS), covering approximately 5.8 million people. Results: 51,690 NVAF patients initiated OAC; 47,197 (91.3%) were naive to OAC and 32,404 (62.7%) initiated acenocoumarol. Mean age was 72.8 years (SD 12.3) and 49.4% were women. Platelet-aggregation inhibitors were taken by 9105 (17.6%) of the patients. Persistence and adherence were estimated up to the end of follow-up. For 22,075 patients, persistence was higher among the non-naive patients [n = 258 (61.7%)] than among the naive [n = 11,502 (53.1%)]. Adherence was estimated for patients initiating DOAC and it was similar in naive and non-naive patients. Among the naive to DOAC treatment, those starting rivaroxaban showed a highest proportion [(n = 360 (80.1%)] of good adherence at implementation (MPR > 80%) while patients starting dabigatran were less adherent [n = 203 (47.8%)]. Conclusions: Acenocoumarol was the most frequently prescribed OAC as first therapy in NVAF patients. Non-naive to DOAC showed better persistence than naive. Rivaroxaban showed higher proportion of adherent patients during the implementation phase than apixaban and dabigatran the lowest. Objetivo: Describir datos sociodemográficos, comorbilidades, comedicaciones y riesgo de eventos tromboembólicos y hemorrágicos de los pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular (FANV) que inician tratamiento anticoagulante por vía oral (TAO) para prevención del ictus. Estimar adherencia y persistencia al TAO. Emplazamiento: Atención primaria (AP) del Instituto Catalán de Salud (ICS), Cataluña, España. Participantes: Adultos con FANV que inician TAO para prevención de ictus entre agosto del 2013 y diciembre del 2015. Métodos: Estudio de cohortes de base poblacional. Adherencia y persistencia se midieron en pacientes que iniciaban TAO entre agosto del 2013 y diciembre del 2014. Fuente de datos: SIDIAP, base de datos procedentes de registros electrónicos de AP del ICS, que cubre aproximadamente una población de 5,8 millones de personas. Resultados: Cincuenta y un mil seiscientos noventa pacientes con FANV iniciaron TAO, 47.197 (91,3%) eran naïve al TAO y 32.404 (62,7%) iniciaron acenocumarol. Su edad media era 72,8 años (DE 12,3) y el 49,4% eran mujeres; 90105 (17,6%) recibían tratamiento antiagregante plaquetario. Persistencia y adherencia se estimaron hasta el final del seguimiento. La persistencia a anticoagulantes orales directos (ACOD) fue mayor en no naïve que en naïve (61,7% vs. 53,1%). La adherencia a ACOD fue similar en los 2 grupos. Entre los naïve, los pacientes que iniciaban rivaroxabán (80,1%) mostraron mayor adherencia en la implementación (MPR > 80%), mientras que los que iniciaban dabigatrán fueron menos adherentes (47,8%). Conclusiones: Acenocumarol fue el anticoagulante más prescrito. Los pacientes no naïve mostraron mejor persistencia al tratamiento que los naïve. Rivaroxabán mostró mayores tasas de adherencia que apixabán y dabigatrán, las menores.

Inhibidor de BET; Limfoma no Hodgkin; Tumors sòlids Inhibidor de BET; Linfoma no Hodgkin; Tumores sólidos BET inhibitor; Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; Solid tumors Background Bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) proteins are epigenetic readers that regulate expression of genes involved in oncogenesis. CC-90010 is a novel, oral, reversible, small-molecule BET inhibitor. Patients and methods CC-90010-ST-001 (NCT03220347; 2015-004371-79) is a phase I dose-escalation and expansion study of CC-90010 in patients with advanced or unresectable solid tumors and relapsed/refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We report results from the dose escalation phase, which explored 11 dose levels and four dosing schedules, two weekly (2 days on/5 days off; 3 days on/4 days off), one biweekly (3 days on/11 days off), and one monthly (4 days on/24 days off). The primary objectives were to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and schedule. Secondary objectives were to evaluate signals of early antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Results This study enrolled 69 patients, 67 with solid tumors and two with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The median age was 57 years (range, 21–80) and the median number of prior regimens was four (range, 1–9). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were mostly mild and manageable; grade 3/4 TRAEs reported in more than two patients were thrombocytopenia (13%), anemia, and fatigue (4% each). Six patients had dose-limiting toxicities. MTDs were 15 mg (2 days on/5 days off), 30 mg (3 days on/11 days off), and 45 mg (4 days on/24 days off). The RP2D and schedule selected for expansion was 45 mg (4 days on/24 days off). As of 8 October 2019, one patient with grade 2 astrocytoma achieved a complete response, one patient with endometrial carcinoma had a partial response, and six patients had prolonged stable disease ≥11 months. Conclusions CC-90010 is well tolerated, with single-agent activity in patients with heavily pretreated, advanced solid tumors. This work was supported by Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA. (no grant number).

Altres ajuts: Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER); Red de Investigación Renal (RedInRen); European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA); Fundación Renal Iñigo Álvarez de Toledo (FRIAT); Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12); Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Fondation Maladies Rares (LAM-RD_20170304); National Research Agency (ANR, grants MNaims ANR-17-CE17-0012-01); "Investments for the Future" Laboratory of Excellence SIGNALIFE, a network for innovation on signal transduction pathways in life sciences (ANR-11-LABX-0028-01); Initiative of Excellence (IDEX; UCAJedi ANR-15-IDEX-01); Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM, ING20140129210, DEQ20180339193, FDT201805005509). A cyclical corticosteroid-cyclophosphamide regimen is recommended for patients with primary membranous nephropathy at high risk of progression. We hypothesized that sequential therapy with tacrolimus and rituximab is superior to cyclical alternating treatment with corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide in inducing persistent remission in these patients. This was tested in a randomized, open-label controlled trial of 86 patients with primary membranous nephropathy and persistent nephrotic syndrome after six-months observation and assigned 43 each to receive six-month cyclical treatment with corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide or sequential treatment with tacrolimus (full-dose for six months and tapering for another three months) and rituximab (one gram at month six). The primary outcome was complete or partial remission of nephrotic syndrome at 24 months. This composite outcome occurred in 36 patients (83.7%) in the corticosteroid-cyclophosphamide group and in 25 patients (58.1%) in the tacrolimus-rituximab group (relative risk 1.44; 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.92). Complete remission at 24 months occurred in 26 patients (60%) in the corticosteroid-cyclophosphamide group and in 11 patients (26%) in the tacrolimus-rituximab group (2.36; 1.34 to 4.16). Anti-PLA2R titers showed a significant decrease in both groups but the proportion of anti-PLA2R-positive patients who achieved immunological response (depletion of anti-PLA2R antibodies) was significantly higher at three and six months in the corticosteroid-cyclophosphamide group (77% and 92%, respectively), as compared to the tacrolimus-rituximab group (45% and 70%, respectively). Relapses occurred in one patient in the corticosteroid-cyclophosphamide group, and three patients in the tacrolimus-rituximab group. Serious adverse events were similar in both groups. Thus, treatment with corticosteroid-cyclophosphamide induced remission in a significantly greater number of patients with primary membranous nephropathy than tacrolimus-rituximab.

Brain volume; Multiple sclerosis; Ozanimod Volumen cerebral; Esclerosis múltiple; Ozanimod Volum cerebral; Esclerosi múltiple; Ozanimod Background Cognitive dysfunction, including slowed cognitive processing speed (CPS), is one of the most disabling symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS). The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a preferred measure of CPS for MS trials and routine screening. Based on encouraging SDMT results in the phase 3 SUNBEAM trial, these post hoc, exploratory analyses were conducted to further compare effects of the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator ozanimod versus intramuscular interferon β-1a on CPS in participants with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Methods In the phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, SUNBEAM study, adults (aged 18‒55 years) with RMS (N=1,346) were randomized to once-daily oral ozanimod 0.92 or 0.46 mg, or weekly intramuscular interferon β-1a 30 µg. The study continued until the last participant was treated for 12 months. CPS was measured as part of a secondary endpoint using the SDMT. Exploratory, post hoc analyses evaluated SDMT change and percentages of participants with clinically meaningful (≥4-point) SDMT improvement or worsening at months 6 and 12, and relationship between SDMT and brain volume on magnetic resonance imaging. Results Ozanimod improved SDMT scores compared with interferon β-1a at months 6 and 12. At month 12, least squares mean difference in SDMT z-scores for ozanimod 0.92 mg versus interferon β-1a was 0.102 (95% CI, 0.031‒0.174, nominal p = 0.0051; standardized mean difference = 0.1376). A greater percentage of ozanimod 0.92 mg‒treated participants had clinically meaningful improvements in SDMT scores versus interferon β-1a at month 6 (30.0% versus 22.2%) and month 12 (35.6% versus 27.9%). Of those with SDMT improvement at month 6, 66.4% of those treated with ozanimod 0.92 mg and 55.9% of those treated with interferon β-1a had sustained improvement at month 12. Brain volume loss was similar for those with SDMT improvement versus worsening at month 12. Conclusions In these exploratory analyses, ozanimod had modestly beneficial effects on CPS in RMS participants. The effects of ozanimod on SDMT are being further evaluated in an ongoing 3-year clinical trial. SUNBEAM is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02294058) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT 2014‐002320‐27). SUNBEAM was sponsored by Celgene Corporation. The sponsor was involved in data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript preparation, review, and approval. All authors vouch for data accuracy, reviewed all drafts, and approved the final manuscript.

QVRS; Nintedanib; Temps de deteriorament CVRS; Nintedanib; Tiempo para el deterioro HRQoL; Nintedanib; Time to deterioration Introduction We used European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) data from the LUME-Colon 1 study to illustrate different methods of statistical analysis for health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and compared the results. Patients and Methods Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive nintedanib 200 mg twice daily plus best supportive care (n = 386) or matched placebo plus best supportive care (n = 382). Five methods (mean treatment difference averaged over time, using a mixed-effects growth curve model; mixed-effects models for repeated measurements (MMRM); time-to-deterioration (TTD); status change; and responder analysis) were used to analyze EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/QoL and scores from functional scales. Results Overall, GHS/QoL and physical functioning deteriorated over time. Mean treatment difference slightly favored nintedanib over placebo for physical functioning (adjusted mean, 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-4.34) and social functioning (adjusted mean, 2.62; 95% CI, 0.66-4.47). GHS/QoL was numerically better with nintedanib versus placebo (adjusted mean, 1.61; 95% CI, −0.004 to 3.27). MMRM analysis had similar results, with better physical functioning in the nintedanib group at all timepoints. There was no significant delay in GHS/QoL deterioration (10%) and physical functioning (16%) with nintedanib versus placebo (TTD analysis). Status change analysis showed a higher proportion of patients with markedly improved GHS/QoL and physical functioning in the nintedanib versus placebo groups. Responder analysis showed a similar, less pronounced pattern. Conclusion Analyses of EORTC QLQ-C30 data showed that HRQoL was not impaired by treatment with nintedanib versus placebo. Analysis and interpretation of HRQoL endpoints should consider symptom type and severity and course of disease. This work was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim. Medical writing assistance, supported financially by Boehringer Ingelheim, was provided by Syneos Health Communications during the preparation of this manuscript.

QVRS; Nintedanib; Temps de deteriorament CVRS; Nintedanib; Tiempo para el deterioro HRQoL; Nintedanib; Time to deterioration Introduction We used European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) data from the LUME-Colon 1 study to illustrate different methods of statistical analysis for health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and compared the results. Patients and Methods Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive nintedanib 200 mg twice daily plus best supportive care (n = 386) or matched placebo plus best supportive care (n = 382). Five methods (mean treatment difference averaged over time, using a mixed-effects growth curve model; mixed-effects models for repeated measurements (MMRM); time-to-deterioration (TTD); status change; and responder analysis) were used to analyze EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/QoL and scores from functional scales. Results Overall, GHS/QoL and physical functioning deteriorated over time. Mean treatment difference slightly favored nintedanib over placebo for physical functioning (adjusted mean, 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-4.34) and social functioning (adjusted mean, 2.62; 95% CI, 0.66-4.47). GHS/QoL was numerically better with nintedanib versus placebo (adjusted mean, 1.61; 95% CI, −0.004 to 3.27). MMRM analysis had similar results, with better physical functioning in the nintedanib group at all timepoints. There was no significant delay in GHS/QoL deterioration (10%) and physical functioning (16%) with nintedanib versus placebo (TTD analysis). Status change analysis showed a higher proportion of patients with markedly improved GHS/QoL and physical functioning in the nintedanib versus placebo groups. Responder analysis showed a similar, less pronounced pattern. Conclusion Analyses of EORTC QLQ-C30 data showed that HRQoL was not impaired by treatment with nintedanib versus placebo. Analysis and interpretation of HRQoL endpoints should consider symptom type and severity and course of disease. This work was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim. Medical writing assistance, supported financially by Boehringer Ingelheim, was provided by Syneos Health Communications during the preparation of this manuscript.