Search

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment of different advanced solid tumors, but most patients develop severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Although a bi-directional crosstalk between bone and immune systems is widely described, the effect of ICIs on the skeleton is poorly investigated. Here, we analyze the changes in plasma levels of type I collagen C-terminal telopeptide (CTX-I) and N -terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP), reference makers of bone turnover, in patients treated with ICIs and their association with clinical outcome. A series of 44 patients affected by advanced non-small cell lung cancer or renal cell carcinoma, without bone metastases, and treated with ICIs as monotherapy were enrolled. CTX-I and PINP plasma levels were assessed at baseline and after 3 months of ICIs treatment by ELISA kits. A significant increase of CTX-I with a concomitant decreasing trend towards the reduction of PINP was observed after 3 months of treatment. Intriguingly, CTX-I increase was associated with poor prognosis in terms of treatment response and survival. These data suggest a direct relationship between ICIs treatment, increased osteoclast activity and potential fracture risk. Overall, this study reveals that ICIs may act as triggers for skeletal events, and if confirmed in larger prospective studies, it would identify a new class of skeletal-related irAEs., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

Background: The application of different models of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in multiple myeloma has demonstrated the feasibility and safety of outpatient-based programs of care. Although several systematic reviews have evaluated the burden of caregivers, only a few studies have included outpatient ASCT., Patients and Methods: The feelings of lack of family support, daily activities, and general health were compared between caregivers of 2 groups of patients with multiple myeloma who underwent inpatient (n = 71) or outpatient (n = 25) ASCT., Results: The 3 features did not significantly differ between the 2 study groups at baseline, before, and 3 months after ASCT. Multivariate modeling showed that the baseline values were significantly related to the changes in study outcomes independent of patient and caregiver characteristics. Other correlates were caregivers' work and patient age for impact on daily activities and disease burden across time for impact on general health (all P < .05)., Conclusion: The outpatient model neither improves nor impairs global caregivers' burden compared to standard ASCT care. Further research is needed to confirm this observation and to better assess the burden and quality of life of caregivers and their influence on patient outcomes and quality of life., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: More than one-third of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) will relapse after allogenic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT). The main challenge is to overcome disease resistance to achieve a new complete remission while avoiding excessive toxicity. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a conjugate of calicheamicin linked to the humanized monoclonal anti-CD33 antibody, has been used for refractory or relapsed AML with promising response rates, but liver toxicity of GO has long been considered a limiting factor., Patients and Methods: We included 18 consecutive patients with AML relapsing after a first allo-HCT and treated with fractioned GO (fGO) and intensive chemotherapy. The median age was 40 years (range, 18-65)., Results: The overall response rate was 72% (13/18), including 7 complete remissions. No death was attributed to treatment toxicity. The main liver toxicity was transient and consisted of transaminase level elevation and hyperbilirubinemia. No cases of veno-occlusive disease were observed after the GO treatment. From the time of salvage treatment initiation, 1- and 2-year OS rates were 54% (95% confidence interval, 28%-74%) and 42% (95% confidence interval, 19%-63%), respectively., Conclusions: Our study suggests the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of an fGO-based salvage regimen combined with intensive chemotherapy in patients with CD33+ AML in the case of early relapse after an allo-HCT., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Aims: Corticosteroids are the standard first-line treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), but they are associated with many complications, and less than half of patients have a sustained response., Methods: To improve outcomes, we performed a retrospective study to analyze the efficacy of the addition of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) to low-dose corticosteroids in 37 adult patients (median age, 57 years) with skin-predominant aGVHD (grade I, n = 17; grade II, n = 18; and grade III, n = 2). All patients received ECP in combination with 1 mg/kg prednisone (n = 26) or topical steroids (n = 11)., Results: Overall response rate was 81% after a median of three ECP procedures (range, 2-8), including 22 complete responses (CR, 59%) and eight very good partial responses (VGPR, 22%). The 11 patients treated with topical corticosteroids achieved CR. Furthermore, 16 (62%) patients reached prednisone withdrawal at a median of 100 days (range, 42-174 days) after its initiation. Eighteen patients developed chronic GVHD (cGVHD); 11 of them (who were in CR of aGVHD) had a new-onset cGVHD, and seven experienced progressive cGVHD (five non-responding and two VGPR patients). A second-line immunosuppressive treatment was initiated in only five (14%) non-responding patients. With a median follow-up of 31 months (range, 6-57 months) 2-year overall survival and non-relapse mortality were 74% and 11%, respectively., Conclusions: Overall, the combination of low-dose corticosteroids and ECP appear to be safe and effective for first-line treatment of skin predominant aGVHD., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest MM and FM received honoraria for lectures from Therakos/Mallinckrodt, whose device was included in this study. The other authors have no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article., (Copyright © 2020 International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction/background: Azacytidine (AZA) has been used as a promising treatment for relapse after allogeneic transplantation. A clear benefit has been demonstrated when treating patients with a reduced disease burden, thus a prophylactic and preemptive approach to these patients has emerged., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with myeloid malignancies treated with azacytidine in the posttransplantation setting between September 2013 and April 2018 in a single tertiary care hospital. Of 32 patients analyzed, 21 were treated for prophylactic use and 11 preemptively, with a median follow-up of 20 months. Prophylactic treatment consisted of AZA at 32 mg/m 2 for 5 days every 28 days, and preemptive treatment of AZA 75 mg/m 2 for 5 or 7 days per cycle. In addition, 10 patients received one or more donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs). Two patients presented with infectious complications demanding hospitalization, and 13 patients (10 in the prophylactic group and 3 in the preemptive group) presented graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Of patients who had GvHD, 3 needed treatment discontinuation. Overall, 12 patients suspended treatment, 8 for disease progression and 1 due to patient request., Results: In the prophylactic group, all patients are alive at 1 year with an event-free survival (EFS) of 95%, as only 1 patient relapsed. In the preemptive group, 1-year EFS was 54% and 1-year overall survival was 82%., Conclusion: Low-dose AZA in posttransplantation patients with myeloid neoplasms is a well-tolerated therapy with the potential to prevent relapse and maintain stable remissions. Randomized prospective trials are needed to determine patient selection and dosage, timing, and duration of treatment., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)