Search

In the United States, home health agencies (HHAs) provide essential services for patients recovering from post-acute care and older adults who are aging in place. During the COVID-19 pandemic, HHAs may face additional challenges caring for these vulnerable patients. Our objective was to explore COVID-19 preparedness of US HHAs and compare results by urban/rural location. Cross-sectional study. Using a stratified random sample of 978 HHAs, we conducted a 22-item online survey from April 10 to 17, 2020. Summary statistics were computed; open-ended narrative responses were synthesized using qualitative methods. Similar to national data, most responding HHAs (n = 121, 12% response rate) were for-profit and located in the South. Most HHAs had infectious disease outbreaks included in their emergency preparedness plan (76%), a staff member in charge of outbreak/disaster preparedness (84%), and had provided their staff with COVID-19 education and training (97%). More urban HHAs had cared for confirmed and recovered COVID-19 patients than rural HHAs, but urban HHAs had less capacity to test for COVID-19 than rural HHAs (9% vs 21%). Most (69%) experienced patient census declines and had a current and/or anticipated supply shortage. Rural agencies were affected less than urban agencies. HHAs have already rationed (69%) or implemented extended use (55%) or limited reuse (61%) of personal protective equipment (PPE). Many HHAs reported accessing supplemental PPE from state/local resources, donations, and do-it-yourself efforts; more rural HHAs had accessed these additional resources compared with urban HHAs. This survey reveals challenges that HHAs are having in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly among urban agencies. Of greatest concern are the declines in patient census, which drastically affect agency revenue, and the shortages of PPE and disinfectants. Without proper protection, HHA clinicians are at risk of self-exposure and viral transmission to patients and vulnerable family members. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Antihypertensive drugs are prescribed to patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) for their cardioprotective and renoprotective effects. Nationally representative information on the use of antihypertensive drugs among CKD patients is limited. The purpose of this study was to assess the utilization patterns of antihypertensive drugs among the CKD population (stages I-IV) in the United States. Methods: We conducted a retrospective crosssectional analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) panels from 2005-2006, 2007-2008, and 2009-2010. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated and kidney damage was assessed to identify participants with CKD. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants with CKD were reported, as were the antihypertensive drugs they used. Findings: A total weighted sample of 116,231,361 participants representative of the CKD population in the United States (stages I-IV) was identified. Less than one half of the participants with CKD in the NHANES were using antihypertensive drugs. β- blockers were the most commonly used and angiotensin II receptor blockers were the least used antihypertensive agents among participants with CKD. Age (Z70 years), awareness of hypertension or diabetes, and higher stage of CKD were associated with an increased likelihood of antihypertensive drug use among participants with CKD. Implications: The results of our analyses suggest that antihypertensive drugs are underused in the CKD population, and the use of preferred agents (ie, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers) is low. Efforts should be directed toward emphasizing the importance of using antihypertensive drugs in the CKD population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although long-chain ω-3 (n-3) PUFAs (LCco3PUFAs) have been linked to the prevention of some inflammatory disorders, little is known about the association between these fatty acids and incidence of asthma. Objective: The objective was to prospectively investigate the association between LCω3PUFAs and fish intake and incidence of asthma among American young adults. Design: A 20-y follow-up longitudinal analysis was conducted in a biracial cohort of 4162 Americans, aged 18-30 y, with a history of asthma at baseline in 1985. Diet was assessed by a validated interviewer-administered quantitative food-frequency questionnaire at the examinations in 1985, 1992, and 2005. Incident self-reported asthma was defined as having a physician diagnosis of asthma and/ or the use of asthma medications between 1985 and 2005. Results: During the 20-y follow-up, 446 incident cases of asthma were identified. LCco3PUFA intake was significantly inversely associated with incidence of asthma after adjustment for sociodemo- graphic, major lifestyle, and dietary confounders. The multivariable- adjusted HR for the highest quintile of LCω3PUFA intake as compared with the lowest quintile was 0.46 (95% CI: 0.33, 0.64; P-trend < 0.01). However, a higher frequency of nonfiied fish con- sumption was not significantly associated with the risk of asthma. DHA showed a greater inverse association than did EPA. The associ- ation between LCβ3PUFAs and incident asthma was not appreciably modified by sex, race, BMI, smoking status, or atopic status. Conclusion: This study showed that intakes of LCβ3PUFAs are inversely longitudinally associated with the incidence of asthma in American young adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Home health care is a rapidly growing healthcare sector worldwide. Home health professionals face unique challenges related to preventing and controlling infections, which are likely to amplify during an infectious disease outbreak (e.g. SARS-CoV-2). Little is known about the current state of infection prevention and control-related policies and outbreak preparedness at U.S. home health agencies. In this study, we conducted a national survey to assess infection prevention and control-related policies, infrastructure, and procedures prior to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Cross-sectional study. Using a stratified random sample of 1506 U.S. home health agencies, we conducted a 61-item survey (paper and online) from November 9, 2018 to December 31, 2019. Survey data were linked to publicly-available data on the quality of patient care, patient satisfaction, and other agency characteristics. Probability weights were developed to account for sample design and nonresponse; Pearson's χ2, Fisher's exact, t-tests or linear regression were used to compare the universe of agencies/respondents and urban/rural agencies. 35.6% of agencies responded (n = 536). Most home health personnel in charge of infection prevention and control have other responsibilities; one-third have no formal infection prevention and control training. Rural agencies are more likely to not have anyone in charge of infection prevention and control compared to those in urban areas. About 22% of agencies implement recommended guidelines when administering antibiotics. Less than a third (26.4%) report that their staff vaccination rates were higher than 95% during the last flu season. Only 48.1% of agencies accept patients requiring ventilation, and of those, 40.9% located in rural areas do not have specific infection prevention and control policies for ventilated patients, compared to 20.8% in urban areas (p < 0.001). Only 39.7% of agencies provide N95 respirators to their clinical staff; rural agencies are significantly more likely to provide those supplies than urban agencies (50.7% vs. 37.7%, p = 0.004). Lastly, agencies report their greatest challenges with infection prevention and control are collecting/reporting infection data and adherence to/monitoring of nursing bag technique. Prior to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, we found that infection prevention and control was suboptimal among U.S. home health care agencies. Consequently, most agencies have limited capacity to respond to infectious disease outbreaks. Staff and personal protective equipment shortages remain major concerns, and agencies will need to quickly adjust their existing infection prevention and control policies and potentially create new ones. In the long-term, agencies also need to improve influenza vaccination coverage among their staff. Tweetable abstract: Infection prevention and control infrastructure, policies and procedures and outbreak preparedness at U.S. home health agencies was found to be suboptimal in nationally-representative survey conducted just prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]