Search

Aim: To describe recruitment challenges in a randomized controlled translational trial (RCTT) of diabetes prevention in India.Methods: The Diabetes Community Lifestyle Improvement Program (D-CLIP) is a RCTT, comparing standard of care to a step-wise model of diabetes prevention. Overweight adults with prediabetes were identified through a two-step screening process (1) field-based screening: minimal testing with a random capillary glucose measurement and (2) clinic-based screening including an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT).Results: Individuals from the community (n=19377) were screened at residential locations, offices, educational institutions, places of worship, parks and beaches. Of these, 3535 (18.2%) 'high-risk' participants based on capillary glucose values were eligible for step 2 screening with OGTT. However, only 21.5% participated. An additional 521 participants directly entered step 2 via direct referrals from our clinical/research databases, study participant referrals and targeted advertisements. Of the 1285 individuals who underwent an OGTT, 710 (55.3%) were eligible for randomization, and 602 (84.8%) were randomized into the trial. The ratio of participants entering from step 1 to step 2 was 25:1 (3.9%) and from step 2 to randomization 2:1 (47%). Average staff time for recruitment was 350 h per week for an 11-person team.Conclusions: Nearly 55 people needed to be screened with a questionnaire plus capillary glucose test to randomize one participant with prediabetes. Using a 2-step strategy requires additional staff time, but considerably reduces the need for OGTT's, thereby minimizing participant burden and study costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AIMS: This paper attempts to describe the patterns of exercise and the perceived benefits and barriers to exercise in an urban south Indian population. METHODS: Study participants were recruited from the baseline survey of the D-CLIP (Diabetes Community Lifestyle Improvement Program). Frequency, duration, type and location of exercise were assessed using a questionnaire, while a Likert type scale was used to assess perceived benefits of and barriers to exercise. Quality of life was measured using the EQ-5D. RESULTS: Out of 1281 participants (63.7% males), 24.1% reported doing >=150min of exercise/week ('exercisers') compared to 75.9% 'non-exercisers'. Exercisers were significantly older (47 vs. 43 years), better educated (68.8% vs. 60%), had a higher monthly income (41% vs. 29.2%), consumed more fruits (38.2% vs. 25.6%) and vegetables (84.1% vs. 77.7%) and had better perceived state of health (81.1% vs. 76.8%), compared to non-exercisers. Exercisers had significantly lower HOMA-IR, higher Matsuda index and lower prevalence of low HDL cholesterol compared to non-exercisers. However, there were no significant differences in cardio-metabolic risk factors like diabetes, hypertension and obesity between the two groups. Walking was the most common type of exercise. Both exercisers and non-exercisers perceived the benefits of exercising, but barriers weighed more heavily on exercise behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Urgent steps are needed to improve overall exercise levels in India by addressing barriers and improving the quality of exercise performed so as to enhance overall metabolic health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of cognitive impairment with sleep quality, depression, and cardiometabolic risk factors among participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods: Subjects underwent clinical interview to capture socio-demographic details, medical history, sleep quality, presence of depression, along with anthropometric and biochemical measurements. A detailed neuropsychological assessment [Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA), Trail making A and B, Digit span, Spatial span, Letter Number Sequencing] was done. Cognitive impairment was defined as MoCA score of <23.Results: Participants (n=250, 50% women, 63.6% middle-age) had a mean (±SD) age of 53.6 (±9.1) years and HbA1c of 55.1±6.8mmol/mol (7.2±0.6%). Cognitive impairment was present in 57 (22.8%) participants. In the middle-age subgroup, cognitive impairment was higher (23.9%) than those in the fourth decade (6.3%), but comparable (24.0%) to the older age (60-70years) individuals. Diabetes-related vascular complications [Odds ratio (95% CI) 2.03 (1.05, 3.94)]; hypertension [2.00 (1.04, 3.84)], depression [2.37 (1.24, 4.55)] and lower education [2.73 (1.42, 5.23)] had a significant association with cognitive impairment on multivariate logistic regression analysis.Conclusion: The high burden of cognitive impairment calls for an urgent need to establish longitudinal cohorts in midlife to understand this population's cognitive trajectories and see the influence of various bio-psychosocial variables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]