Resume Introduction Nous rapportons le premier cas de necrolyse epidermique toxique (NET) survenue sous vemurafenib. Observation Une femme de 75 ans etait traitee par vemurafenib pour un melanome de stade IV porteur de la mutation BRAF V600E. Elle presentait brutalement de la fievre, un erytheme maculo-papuleux diffus prurigineux, un �deme palpebral, une bulle palmaire, une conjonctivite, une cheilite et des erosions muqueuses. L'evolution se faisait vers un decollement touchant 50 % de la surface cutanee. La biopsie cutanee montrait une dermatose lichenoide, focalement vesiculeuse avec de nombreux polynucleaires eosinophiles. L'etude en immunofluorescence directe (IFD) etait negative. Le vemurafenib etait le seul medicament imputable. Nous concluions a une NET au vemurafenib. Discussion Il s'agit a notre connaissance du premier cas rapporte de NET au vemurafenib mais cet effet indesirable, quoique deja decrit dans l'etude BRIM-3, semble rare en pratique clinique. Dans la litterature, d'autres reactions cutanees severes ont ete decrites. Parmi elles, un cas de syndrome de Stevens-Johnson chez une patiente sous vemurafenib, precedemment traitee par ipilimumab. De maniere plus frequente, les reactions cutanees a type d'efflorescence de lesions hyperkeratosiques benignes parfois accompagnees d'authentiques carcinomes epidermoides ou keratoacanthomes sont rapportees et justifient une surveillance cutanee reguliere des patients traites par vemurafenib. Conclusion Devant l'apparition d'un exantheme maculo-papuleux sous vemurafenib, la poursuite du traitement doit etre reevaluee puisque le risque d'evolution plus grave, comme ici, une NET, n'est pas nul. ________________________________________ Summary Background Herein we report the first case of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) occurring with use of vemurafenib. Patients and methods A 75-year-old female patient was being treated with vemurafenib for stage IV melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. She suddenly presented fever, diffuse pruriginous maculopapular erythema, palpebral edema, palmar bulla, conjunctivitis, cheilitis and mucosal ulceration. The condition progressed towards detachment affecting 50% of the skin area. Cutaneous biopsy revealed lichenoid dermatosis, chiefly vesicular with numerous eosinophils. Direct immunofluorescence (IFD) was negative. Vemurafenib was the only drug to which the reaction was ascribable and we concluded on vemurafenib-induced TEN. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of vemurafenib-induced TEN, but this adverse effect, although already described in the BRIM-3 study, appears rare in clinical practice. Other severe skin reactions have been described in the literature. These include a case of Stevens-Johnson syndrome in a female patient treated with vemurafenib and previously receiving ipilimumab. A more common occurrence is cutaneous reactions involving efflorescence of benign hyperkeratotic lesions, occasionally accompanied by authentic epidermal carcinoma or keratoacanthoma, and requiring regular dermatological monitoring of patients treated with vemurafenib. Conclusion If maculopapular exanthema occurs under vemurafenib, continuation of this treatment should be reassessed since the risk of progression to a more serious condition such as TEN, as seen in the present case, cannot be ruled out. Mots cles " Vemurafenib; " Necrolyse epidermique toxique; " Syndrome de Lyell; " Melanome Keywords " Vemurafenib; " Toxic epidermal necrolysis; " Lyell's syndrome; " Melanoma