1. Anticooperative Binding Governs the Mechanics of Ethidium-Complexed DNA
- Author
-
Ralf Seidel and Jasmina Dikic
- Subjects
Models, Molecular ,Intercalation (chemistry) ,Biophysics ,Stacking ,Biophysical Phenomena ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Ethidium ,Molecule ,030304 developmental biology ,0303 health sciences ,Binding Sites ,Chemistry ,Articles ,DNA ,Intercalating Agents ,Helix ,Nucleic acid ,Nucleic Acid Conformation ,Thermodynamics ,Contour length ,Elongation ,Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
DNA intercalators bind nucleic acids by stacking between adjacent basepairs. This causes a considerable elongation of the DNA backbone as well as untwisting of the double helix. In the past few years, single-molecule mechanical experiments have become a common tool to characterize these deformations and to quantify important parameters of the intercalation process. Parameter extraction typically relies on the neighbor-exclusion model, in which a bound intercalator prevents intercalation into adjacent sites. Here, we challenge the neighbor-exclusion model by carefully quantifying and modeling the force-extension and twisting behavior of single ethidium-complexed DNA molecules. We show that only an anticooperative ethidium binding that allows for a disfavored but nonetheless possible intercalation into nearest-neighbor sites can consistently describe the mechanical behavior of intercalator-bound DNA. At high ethidium concentrations and elevated mechanical stress, this causes an almost complete occupation of nearest-neighbor sites and almost a doubling of the DNA contour length. We furthermore show that intercalation into nearest-neighbor sites needs to be considered when estimating intercalator parameters from zero-stress elongation and twisting data. We think that the proposed anticooperative binding mechanism may also be applicable to other intercalating molecules.
- Published
- 2019