Search

Objectives Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to support patients in severe cardiogenic shock. In the absence of recovery, these patients may need to be listed for heart transplant (HT), which offers the best long-term prognosis. However, posttransplantation mortality is significantly elevated in patients who receive ECMO. The objective of the present study was to describe and risk-stratify different profiles of patients listed for HT supported by ECMO. Methods Patients listed for HT in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were analyzed. The primary outcome was 1-year survival and was assessed in patients bridged to transplant with ECMO (ECMOBTT) and patients who were previously supported on ECMO but had it removed before HT (ECMOREMOVED). Results Among 65,636 adult candidates listed for HT (between 2001 and 2017), 712 were supported on ECMO, 292 of whom (41%) underwent HT (ECMOBTT, n = 202; ECMOREMOVED, n = 90). Most of the patients with ECMOREMOVED were transplanted with a ventricular assist device. In ECMOBTT, recipient age (each 10-year increase), time on the waitlist (both defined as minor risk factors), need for dialysis, and need for mechanical ventilation (both defined as major risk factors) were independent predictors of mortality. ECMOREMOVED and ECMOBTT with no risk factors showed 1-year survival comparable to that in patients who were never supported on ECMO. Compared with patients who were never on ECMO, patients in ECMOBTT group with minor risk factors, 1 major risk factor, and 2 major risk factors had ~2-, ~5-, and >10-fold greater 1-year mortality, respectively (P Conclusions The HT recipients in the ECMOREMOVED and ECMOBTT groups with no risk factors showed similar survival as the HT recipients who were never supported on ECMO. In the ECMOBTT group, posttransplantation mortality increased significantly with increasing risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate variations across hospitals in infection rates and associated costs, the latter reflected in 90-day Medicare payments. Despite high rates and expenditures of healthcare-associated infections associated with durable ventricular assist device implant, few studies have examined inter-hospital variation and associated costs. METHODS: Clinical data on 8688 patients who received primary durable ventricular assist devices from July 2008 to July 2017 from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (Intermacs) hospitals (n=120) were merged with post-implant 90-day Medicare claims. Terciles of hospital-specific, risk-adjusted infection rates per 100 patient-months were estimated using Intermacs and associated with Medicare payments (among 5440 Medicare beneficiaries). Primary outcomes included infections within 90 days of implant and Medicare payments. RESULTS: There were 3982 infections identified among 27.8% (2,417/8,688) of patients developing an infection. The median (25(th), 75(th) percentile) adjusted incidence of infections (per 100 patient-months) across hospitals was 14.3 (9.3, 19.5) and varied by hospital (range 0.0 – 35.6). Total Medicare payments from implant to 90-days were 9.0% (absolute difference: $13,652) greater in high versus low infection tercile hospitals, p

On June 3, 2021 Medtronic, Inc announced discontinuation of the HVAD left ventricular assist device. The purpose of this analysis was to provide summary data on surgical risks of HVAD to HeartMate 3 exchange and compare survival after HVAD to HeartMate 3 exchange to survival after primary HVAD implantation.Three cohorts within The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs database were identified: primary HVAD implant cohort (January 2017 to March 2021, n = 3797), HVAD to HeartMate 3 exchange cohort (December 2017 to March 2021, n = 45), and HVAD to HVAD exchange cohort (January 2017 to March 2021, n = 234). Mortality after HVAD to HeartMate 3 exchange was modeled and compared with the constant hazard phase for risk of mortality while on continued HVAD support. As a secondary analysis outcomes and survival were compared between patients who underwent HVAD to HeartMate 3 and HVAD to HVAD exchange.HVAD to HeartMate 3 exchange was associated with significantly reduced survival compared with survival while remaining on HVAD support (6 months after exchange, 73.8% [70% confidence interval, 68.6-77.8] vs 79.0% [70% confidence interval, 78.3-79] for continued HVAD support). Compared with HVAD to HVAD exchange, survival was higher after replacement with HeartMate 3 (1 year: 85.9% [70% confidence interval, 79.5-90.5] vs 66.6% [70% confidence interval, 63.0-70.0], P = .009).Compared with continued support on HVAD, an exchange to HeartMate 3 was found to be associated with a significant increase in mortality. For patients who required pump exchange on HVAD support, exchange to HeartMate 3 demonstrated superior survival. Currently there is insufficient evidence to support elective exchange from an HVAD to HeartMate 3.

Background This report describes 9 high-risk neonates and infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) who were stabilized with a combined hybrid approach and ventricular assist device (VAD) insertion (HYBRID+VAD) in preparation for heart transplantation. Methods A total of 9 patients with HLHS (7 neonates, 2 infants) presented with anatomic or physiologic features associated with an increased risk for conventional univentricular palliation with the Norwood operation (large coronary sinusoids or fistulas, severe tricuspid regurgitation, cardiogenic shock, restrictive atrial septum). These patients underwent combined VAD insertion (Berlin EXCOR, Berlin Heart, Inc, Berlin, Germany) and Stage 1 hybrid palliation (application of bilateral pulmonary bands, stent placement in the patent arterial duct, and atrial septectomy if needed). During this same era, at the Congenital Heart Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 46 neonates underwent a Norwood operation, 4 neonates underwent a hybrid approach “Stage 1” without VAD, and 3 patients with HLHS were supported with prostaglandin while awaiting heart transplantation. Results At HYBRID+VAD insertion, the median age was 20 days (range, 13 to 143 days), and median weight was 3.25 kg (range, 2.43 to 4.2 kg). Six patients survive (67%), and 3 patients died (33%). Five survivors are at home doing well after successful heart transplantation, and 1 survivor is doing well in the intensive care unit on VAD support while awaiting transplantation. Only 1 of 6 survivors (16.7%) required intubation more than 10 days after HYBRID+VAD insertion. In 8 patients no longer undergoing VAD support, the median length of VAD support was 119.5 days (range, 56 to 196 days). Conclusions High-risk patients with HLHS who are suboptimal candidates for Norwood palliation can be successfully stabilized with pulsatile VAD insertion along with hybrid palliation while awaiting cardiac transplantation. These patients may be extubated and optimized for transplantation while undergoing VAD support.

Objectives Acute kidney injury (AKI) remains a leading source of morbidity and mortality after cardiothoracic surgery. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2), are novel early-phase renal biomarkers that have been validated as sensitive predictors of AKI. Here the authors studied the efficacy of these biomarkers for predicting AKI after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and cardiac transplantation. Design/Setting/Participants/Interventions This was a prospective study of 73 patients undergoing LVAD implantation (n = 37) or heart transplant (n = 36) from 2016 to 2017 at the authors’ center. TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 were measured with the NephroCheck Test on urine samples before surgery and one-to-six hours after surgery. NephroCheck scores were assessed as predictors of moderate/severe AKI (Kidney Disease International Global Outcomes 2/3 creatinine criteria) within 48 hours of surgery, and the association with survival to one year was investigated. Measurements and Main Results The LVAD and transplant cohorts overall were similar in demographics and baseline creatinine (p > 0.05), with the exception of having more African-American patients in the LVAD arm (p = 0.003). Eleven (30%) LVAD and 16 (44%) transplant patients developed moderate/severe AKI. Overall, AKI was associated with postsurgery NephroCheck (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] for 0.1 mg/dL increase: 1.36 [1.04-1.79]; p = 0.03), but not with baseline NephroCheck (p = 0.92). When analyzed by cohort, this effect remained for LVAD (1.68 [1.05-2.71]; p = 0.03) but not for transplant (p = 0.15). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed postoperative NephroCheck to be superior to baseline creatinine in LVAD (p = 0.046). Furthermore, an increase of 0.1 mg/dL in postoperative NephroCheck was associated with a 10% increase in the risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.11 [1.01-1.21]; p = 0.04) independent of age and body mass index. Conclusion Assessment of TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 within six hours after surgery appeared effective at predicting AKI in patients with LVADs. Larger studies are warranted to validate these findings.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The effect of a centrifugal continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (cfLVAD) on hemodynamic left ventricular unloading (HLVU) and the clinical conditions that interfere with hemodynamic optimization are not well defined. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated the likelihood of incomplete HLVU, defined as high pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (hPCWP)> 15mmHg in 104 ambulatory cfLVAD patients when the current standard recommendations for cfLVAD rotor speed setting were applied. We also evaluated the ability of clinical, hemodynamic and echocardiographic variables to predict hPCWP in ambulatory cfLVAD patients. RESULTS Twenty-eight percent of the patients showed hPCWP. The variables associated with a higher risk of hPCWP were age, central venous pressure, absence of treatment with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, and brain natriuretic peptide levels. Patients with optimal HLVU had a 15.2±14.7% decrease in postoperative indexed left ventricular end-diastolic diameter compared with 8.9±11.8% in the group with hPCWP (P=.041). Independent predictors of hPCWP included brain natriuretic peptide and age. Brain natriuretic peptide

Refractory right ventricular failure at the time of left ventricular assist device implantation requires treatment with supplemental mechanical circulatory support. However, the optimal strategy for support remains unknown.All patients undergoing first-time durable left ventricular assist device implantation with a contemporary device were selected from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database (2011 to 2019). Patients requiring right ventricular assist device (RVAD) or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) were included in the analysis. Patients were stratified by RVAD or VA-ECMO and by timing of placement (intraoperative vs postoperative).In all, 18 423 left ventricular assist device implants were identified, of which 940 (5.1%) required RVAD (n = 750) or VA-ECMO (n = 190) support. Patients receiving an RVAD more frequently had preoperative inotrope requirement (76% vs 62%, P.01) and severe tricuspid regurgitation (20% vs 13%, P.01). The RVAD patients had lower rates of postoperative renal failure (40% vs 51%, P = .02) and limb ischemia (4% vs 13%, P.01), as well as significantly less operative mortality (41% vs 54%, P.01). After risk adjustment with propensity score analysis, support with VA-ECMO was associated with a higher risk of mortality (risk ratio 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.21 to 1.77; P.01) compared with patients receiving an RVAD. Importantly, institution of right ventricular support postoperatively was associated with higher mortality (1.43, P.01) compared with intraoperative initiation.Patients with severe right ventricular failure in the setting of durable left ventricular assist device implantation may benefit from the use of RVAD over VA-ECMO. Regardless of the type of support, initiation at the index operation was associated with improved outcomes.

Background: Significant aortic regurgitation at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, requires concomitant aortic valve (AoV) replacement or repair. However, the impact of concomitant AoV surgery on morbidity remains unknown. Therefore, our aim is to determine the impact of concomitant AoV surgery on thromboembolic and bleeding events. Methods: A retrospective IMACS registry study, including patients implanted from 2013 until September 2017. Differences between different concomitant AoV surgery modalities were analyzed. Results: In total, 785 (5.1%) out of 15.267 patients (median age 58 IQR 49-66 years, 79% male) underwent concomitant AoV surgery (median age 63 IQR 54-69 years, 84% male); 386 (49%) patients received biological prostheses, 71 (9%) mechanical prostheses and 328 (42%) AoV repairs. In total, 54 (8%) patients with AoV surgery experienced a thromboembolic event and 1016 (9%) patients with no AoV surgery. Only AoV repair surgery was associated with an increased rate of pump thrombosis (p=0.024). Furthermore, concomitant AoV surgery was associated with an increased rate of all and nonsurgical bleedings. Following a multivariable Cox regression, concomitant AoV surgery remained an independent predictor for bleeding events. Conclusions: In LVAD patients undergoing concomitant AoV surgery, thromboembolic event rates were not higher, however both all and nonsurgical bleeding event rates were higher. Furthermore, concomitant AoV repair surgery was associated with an increased rate of pump thrombosis.

Some neonates with functionally univentricular hearts are extremely high risk for conventional surgical palliation. Primary cardiac transplantation offers the best option for survival of these challenging neonates; however, waitlist mortality must be minimized. We have developed a comprehensive strategy for the management of neonates with functionally univentricular hearts that includes the selective use of conventional neonatal palliation in standard risk patients, hybrid approaches in neonates with elevated risk secondary to noncardiac etiology, and neonatal palliation combined with insertion of a single ventricular assist device (VAD) in neonates with elevated risk secondary to cardiac etiology. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe our selection criteria, technical details, management strategies, pitfalls, and current outcomes for neonates with functionally univentricular hearts supported with VAD. Our experience documents that extremely high-risk patients with functionally univentricular hearts who are poor candidates for conventional palliation can be successfully stabilized with concomitant palliation and pulsatile VAD insertion while awaiting transplantation.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious complication in patients exposed to heparin, leading to thrombocytopenia and, potentially, thrombosis. This disorder is challenging in cardiac surgery when anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass is required. Herein a patient with HIT who had active thrombosis and successfully underwent urgent left ventricular assist device implantation managed with plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and protamine infusion is described. These therapies reduce the immune response to heparin and minimize thrombosis when heparin reexposure is planned. These approaches to perioperative management of HIT represent an attractive alternative to the use of non-heparin anticoagulants in the cardiac and vascular surgical population.

Advances in surgical techniques and outpatient cardiac care have led to a growing population of pediatric patients surviving well into adulthood with previous single-ventricle palliation. Continued improvement in survival has resulted in subsequent increases in the number of patients with single-ventricle physiology listed for heart transplantations. Some of these patients require mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation, although establishing successful mechanical circulatory support in these complex patients remains challenging. Only limited published data exist describing the perioperative anesthetic management and key considerations dedicated to patients with failing single-ventricle physiology presenting for ventricular assist devices. This clinical review aims to provide a focused evaluation of the vital perioperative considerations encountered in this novel population.

BACKGROUND The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Intermacs Registry represents a real-world data source of durable, left ventricular assist devices that can address knowledge gaps not informed through randomized clinical trials. We sought to compare survival with contemporary left ventricular assist device technologies using multiple analytic approaches to assess concordance of treatment effects and to validate prior STS Intermacs observations. METHODS Patients (≥19 years of age) enrolled into STS Intermacs between August 2017 and June 2019 were stratified by device type (continuous flow, centrifugal left ventricular assist device with hybrid levitation [CF-HL] or full magnetic levitation [CF-FML]). The primary outcome was 1-year survival assessed by 3 statistical methodologies (multivariable regression, propensity score matching, and instrumental variable analysis). RESULTS Of 4448 patients, 2012 (45.2%) received the CF-HL and 2436 (54.8%) received the CF-FML. One-year survival for the CF-FML was 88% vs 79% for the CF-HL (overall P < .001), with a hazard ratio for mortality of 3.18 for the CF-HL (P < .0001) after risk adjustment. With propensity score matching (n = 1400 each cohort), 1-year survival was 87% for the CF-FML vs 80% for the CF-HL, with a hazard ratio of 3.20 for mortality with the CF-HL (P < .0001) after risk adjustment. With an instrumental variable analysis, the probability of receiving the CF-HL was associated with a hazard ratio of 3.11 (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS Statistical methodology using propensity score matching and instrumental variable analysis increased the robustness of observations derived from real-world data and demonstrates the feasibility of performing comparative effectiveness research using STS Intermacs. These analyses provide additional evidence supporting a survival benefit of the CF-FML vs CF-HL.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication of end-stage heart failure (ESHF) and associated with increased mortality. The definition of PH has recently been changed from a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAPm) ≥25 mmHg to a PAPm20 mmHg. Since this change, there are no data evaluating group 2 PH subgroups on outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of updated group 2 PH subgroups on outcomes, as well as to evaluate the clinical, echocardiographic, and haemodynamic characteristics of subgroups, and determine predictors of PH in patients with ESHF.A total of 416 patients with ESHF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤25% were divided into three groups. Pulmonary hypertension was defined as PAPm20 mmHg. Primary outcome was defined as left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, urgent heart transplantation (HT), or death. Secondary outcome was defined as LVAD implantation and HT.Over a median follow-up of 503.5 days, combined pre- and postcapillary PH (Cpc-PH) displayed greater risk of primary outcome than those with isolated postcapillary (Ipc-PH) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-1.91; p0.001) and those with no PH (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.68-3.63; p0.001). Patients with Ipc-PH demonstrated greater risk than those with no PH (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.57-1.90; p0.001). Likelihood ratios of updated PH criteria and old PH criteria (PAPm ≥25 mmHg) in identifying primary outcome were 75.6 (RPulmonary hypertension increases the risk of LVAD, urgent HT, or death, and Cpc-PH further increases risk in patients with ESHF. Compared to the previous definition, a new PH definition better discriminates death, going to urgent HT, or LVAD implantation for PH subgroups.

Background Appropriate collection of quality of life (QOL) measurements for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients is challenging. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a popular tool that has been validated across multiple disciplines, but its applicability to the LVAD population remains unknown. Methods This single-center, retrospective review included LVAD patients that completed a PROMIS assessment and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) survey at clinical encounters postoperatively. Patients completed computer adaptive PROMIS assessments for physical function, pain interference and depression. All PROMIS domains are designed to follow a normal distribution (mean T-score 50, standard deviation 10) in the general population. Assessments were aggregated over time and correlation between the KCCQ-12 summary score and each PROMIS domain was assessed individually. Results A total of 178 LVAD patients were included in the study. The median time between LVAD implantation and PRO collection was 16.5 [interquartile range, 7.9-37.8] months. Patients typically had worse physical function (T-score 38.8 [33.6-44.2]) but comparable pain (51.1 [38.7-59.2]) and depression (49.9 [41.7-57.5]) as the general population. The KCCQ-12 was more strongly correlated to PROMIS physical function (Spearman’s ρ = 0.746) than pain (ρ = -0.539) or depression (ρ = -0.591). Conclusions PROMIS provides a robust QOL data collection system that can be implemented in a clinical setting without imposing a significant burden. Using this more holistic system may allow for better patient-centered care in order to address QOL limitations imposed by LVAD support that are not directly related to heart failure symptoms.

Background: The Impella transaortic microaxial left ventricular assist device (MLVAD) bears the risk of severe ipsilateral limb ischemia due to its percutaneous insertion through the common femoral artery (CFA). As long as the MLVAD is required for cardio - circulatory support, treatment options are limited. Therefore, we developed a temporary extracorporeal femoral - femoral crossover bypass to restore and maintain perfusion of the affected leg. Methods: From October 2018, we treated all patients with severe limb ischemia due to the MLAVD with a femoral - femoral crossover bypass. For comparison, a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing placement of the MLAVD between January 2011 and October 2018 was identified. The primary outcome is the feasibility and safety of our percutaneously established extracorporeal femoral - femoral crossover bypass. Results: Between January 2011 and July 2019, 25 of 245 (10.3%) patients developed a severe ipsilateral limb ischemia following the MLVAD placement. Until October 2018, 20 patients were treated conventionally (C - cohort) and since October 2018, five (consecutive) patients have been treated by an extracorporeal femoral - femoral cross over bypass (BP - Cohort). Following the BP - procedure, an immediate improvement of the perfusion was seen in all patients. Limb salvage was documented in 100% of our patients and 30 - day mortality was 60% in both groups. Conclusion: This is the first case series reporting on this novel technique. We demonstrated that the percutaneous creation of an extracorporeal crossover bypass is feasible, safe and effective and should therefore be promoted.

BACKGROUND There is little insight into which patients can be weaned off right ventricular (RV) acute mechanical circulatory support (AMCS) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We hypothesize that concomitant RV AMCS insertion instead of postoperative implantation will improve 1-year survival and increase the likelihood of RV AMCS weaning. METHODS A multicenter retrospective database of 826 consecutive patients who received a HeartMate II or HVAD between January 2007 and December 2016 was analyzed. We identified 91 patients who had early RV AMCS on index admission. Cox proportional-hazards model was constructed to identify predictors of 1-year mortality post-RV AMCS implantation and competing risk modeling identified RV AMCS weaning predictors. RESULTS There were 91 of 826 patients (11%) who required RV AMCS after CF-LVAD implantation with 51 (56%) receiving a concomitant RV AMCS and 40 (44%) implanted with a postoperative RV AMCS during their ICU stay; 48 (53%) patients were weaned from RV AMCS support. Concomitant RV AMCS with CF-LVAD insertion was associated with lower mortality (HR 0.45 [95% CI 0.26-0.80], p = 0.01) in multivariable model (which included age, BMI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor use, and heart transplantation as a time-varying covariate). In the multivariate competing risk analysis, a TPG < 12 (SHR 2.19 [95% CI 1.02-4.70], p = 0.04) and concomitant RV AMCS insertion (SHR 3.35 [95% CI 1.73-6.48], p < 0.001) were associated with a successful wean. CONCLUSIONS In patients with RVF after LVAD implantation, concomitant RV AMCS insertion at the time of LVAD was associated with improved 1-year survival and increased chances of RV support weaning compared to postoperative insertion.

Preoperative variables can predict short term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) survival, but predictors of extended survival remain insufficiently characterized.Patients undergoing LVAD implant (2012-2018) in the Intermacs registry were grouped according to time on support: short-term (1 year, n = 7,483), mid-term (MT, 1-3 years, n = 5,976) and long-term (LT, ≥3 years, n = 3,015). Landmarked hazard analyses (adjusted hazard ratio, HR) were performed to identify correlates of survival after 1 and 3 years of support.After surviving 1 year of support, additional LVAD survival was less likely in older (HR 1.15 per decade), Caucasian (HR 1.22) and unmarried (HR 1.16) patients (p0.05). After 3 years of support, only 3 preoperative characteristics (age, race, and history of bypass surgery, p0.05) correlated with extended survival. Postoperative events most negatively influenced achieving LT survival. In those alive at 1 year or 3 years, the occurrence of postoperative renal (creatinine HR MT = 1.09; LT HR = 1.10 per mg/dl) and hepatic dysfunction (AST HR MT = 1.29; LT HR = 1.34 per 100 IU), stroke (MT HR = 1.24; LT HR = 1.42), infection (MT HR = 1.13; LT HR = 1.10), and/or device malfunction (MT HR = 1.22; LT HR = 1.46) reduced extended survival (all p ≤ 0.03).Success with LVAD therapy hinges on achieving long term survival in more recipients. After 1 year, extended survival is heavily constrained by the occurrence of adverse events and postoperative end-organ dysfunction. The growth of destination therapy intent mandates that future LVAD studies be designed with follow up sufficient for capturing outcomes beyond 24 months.

Objectives This analysis sought to investigate the waitlist and post-transplant outcomes of individuals bridged to transplantation by using temporary percutaneous endovascular mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) through a status 2 designation (cardiogenic shock and exception). Background The 2018 donor heart allocation policy change granted a status 2 designation to patients supported with tMCS. Methods Adult patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing registry after October 18, 2018 who received a status 2 designation for tMCS were included and grouped by their status 2 criteria: cardiogenic shock with hemodynamic criteria (CS-HD), cardiogenic shock without hemodynamic criteria before tMCS (CS-woHD), and exception. Baseline characteristics, waitlist events (death and delisting), and post-transplant outcomes were compared. Results A total of 2,279 patients met inclusion criteria: 68.6% (n = 1,564) with CS-HD, 3.2% (n = 73) with CS-woHD, and 28.2% (n = 642) with exceptions. A total of 64.2% of patients underwent heart transplantation within 14 days of status 2 listing or upgrade, and 1.9% died or were delisted for worsening clinical condition. Among the 35.8% who did not undergo transplantation following 14 days, only 2.8% went on to receive a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). The 30-day transplantation likelihood was similar among groups: 80.1% for the CS-HD group vs 79.7% for the exception group vs 73.3% for the CS-woHD group; P = 0.31. However, patients who met criteria for CS-woHD had 2.3-fold greater risk of death or delisting (95% CI: 1.10-4.75; P = 0.03) compared with CS-HD patients after multivariable adjustment. Pre-tMCS hemodynamics were not associated with adverse waitlist events. Conclusions The use of tMCS is an efficient, safe, and effective strategy as a bridge to transplantation; however, patients with CS-woHD may represent a high-risk cohort. Transition to a durable LVAD was a rare event in this group.

Background Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a well-described entity for heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Recently, drugs and other substance of abuse have been recognized as potential triggers for DCM. The aim of this study was to assess the survival in patients under 65 years old with toxic cardiomyopathy (TCM). Left ventricular remodeling and the potential usefulness of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) was also assessed. Methods Single center retrospective study from January 2003 to August 2019 at a tertiary care cardiology center identified 553 patients younger than 65 years old with LVEF Results Two hundred and one patients (36%) had a diagnosis of idiopathic DCM. Further analysis identified 38 patients (19%) for which a TCM was the most likely etiology (amphetamine [50%], cocaine [37%], anabolic steroids [8%], and energy drinks [5%]). Despite a mean LVEF of 17±8% at presentation, most patients (n=27, 71%) had an event-free survival with guideline-directed medical therapy, and 61% (n=23) recovered a LVEF ≥40% after a median follow-up of 21±23 months. Seven patients (18%) required a LVAD and 1 (3%) patient a transplantation. All LVAD were explanted or decommissioned after a median support time of 11±4 months following partial or complete LVEF recovery. Conclusion TCM induced by substance abuse is a frequent cause of HF accounting for almost 20% of all patients with DCM of unknown etiology under 65 years of age. Treatment must be tailored on an individual basis. Mechanical circulatory support demonstrated its usefulness in carefully selected patients.

The prevalence of sarcoidosis-related cardiomyopathy is increasing. Sarcoidosis impacts cardiac function through granulomatous infiltration of the heart, resulting in conduction disease, arrhythmia and/or heart failure. Diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis can be challenging and requires clinician awareness as well as differentiation from overlapping diagnostic phenotypes such as other forms of myocarditis and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Clinical manifestations, extracardiac involvement, histopathology, and advanced cardiac imaging can all lend support to a diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis. Mainstay therapy for cardiac sarcoidosis is immunosuppression, however no prospective clinical trials exist to guide management. Patients may progress to developing advanced heart failure or ventricular arrhythmia, for which ventricular assist device therapies or heart transplantation may be considered. The existing knowledge gaps in cardiac sarcoidosis call for an interdisciplinary approach to both patient care and future investigation to improve mechanistic understanding and therapeutic strategies.

Background Heart failure predisposes to intracardiac thrombus (ICT) formation. There are limited data on the prevalence and impact of preexisting ICT on postoperative outcomes in left ventricular assist device patients. We examined the risk for stroke and death in this patient population. Methods and Results We retrospectively studied patients who were implanted with HeartMate (HM) II or HM3 between February 2009 and March 2019. Preoperative transthoracic echocardiograms, intraoperative transesophageal echocardiograms and operative reports were reviewed to identify ICT. There were 525 patients with a left ventricular assist device (median age 60.6 years, 81.8% male, 372 HMII and 151 HM3) included in this analysis. An ICT was identified in 44 patients (8.4%). During the follow-up, 43 patients experienced a stroke and 55 died. After multivariable adjustment, presence of ICT increased the risk for the composite of stroke or death at 6-month (hazard ratio [HR] 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00–3.33, P = .049). Patients with ICT were also at higher risk for stroke (HR 2.45, 95% CI 1.14–5.28, P = .021) and death (HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.17–4.79 P = .016) at 6 months of follow-up. Conclusions The presence of ICT is an independent predictor of stroke and death at 6 months after left ventricular assist device implantation. Additional studies are needed to help risk stratify and optimize the perioperative management of this patient population.

Background Limited data are available concerning the safety, optimal administration and benefits of contemporary heart failure therapy in patients after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Methods : Between 2015 and 2019, 257 patients underwent LVAD implantation and were included in this observational study. Oral heart failure therapy was initiated and uptitrated during the further course. After propensity matching and excluding patients with immediate postoperative treatment in an affiliated center with different medical standards, hospitalization rates and mortality within 12 months after LVAD implantation were compared between 83 patients who received medical therapy including an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and 83 patients who did not receive an ARNI. Results The overall use of heart-failure medications after 12 months was high: prescriptions: beta-blockers, 85%; angiotensin inhibiting drugs, 90% (angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors 30%, angiotensin receptor blockers 23%, ARNI 37%); mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, 80%. No serious drug-related adverse events occurred. The conditional 1-year survival in the group with ARNIs was 97% (95% CI: 94%-100%) compared to 88% in the group without an ARNI (95% CI: 80%-96%); P = 0.06. Conclusions Contemporary heart failure therapy is safe in patients with LVADs. No increase in serious adverse events was seen in patients receiving ARNIs. No significant difference in the conditional 1-year survival was seen between the ARNI group and the nonARNI group.

Objective Infections are among the most common complications in recipients of durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). However, existing studies examining infections in LVAD recipients are limited is size and design. Comprehensive, systematic reviews of all types of infections occurring among recipients of contemporary LVADs have not been conducted. The goal of this scoping review was to synthesize all available evidence related to rates of infections (including location and types) in LVAD recipients. Methods In February 2019, 4,581 published studies were identified through searching five bibliographic databases: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science Core Collection. Inclusion criteria required reporting of infectious complications among LVAD recipients receiving contemporary (HeartMate II, HeartMate 3 and HeartWare HVAD) LVADs. Study key characteristics were extracted by 2 independent reviewers and current literature described narratively. All analyses took place between Feb 2019 and Jan 2021. Results A total of 132 studies met inclusion criteria. Most studies were observational (n=118; 89.4%), single-center (n=93, 70.4%) and from the U.S. (n=88; 66.7%). Only 48 (36.3%) studies used the standardized International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) definition for reporting infections. Only 35 (26.5%) studies reported age, gender and racial distribution of their study population. Driveline infections were the most commonly reported infection type. Conclusions Most studies did not utilize standardized infection definitions or provide complete information on infection locations and types. In order to further advance the scientific rigor, published studies should (i) use standardized definitions for reporting infections and (ii) stratify rates by infection location and type.

BACKGROUND Inhibition of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) improves survival and reduces adverse cardiac events in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but the benefit is not well-defined following left ventricular assist device (LVAD). METHODS We analyzed the ISHLT IMACS registry for adults with a primary, continuous-flow LVAD from January 2013 to September 2017 who were alive at postoperative month 3 without a major adverse event, and categorized patients according to treatment an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI/ARB) or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). Propensity score matching was performed separately for ACEI/ARB vs none (n = 4,118 each) and MRA vs none (n = 3,892 each). RESULTS Of 11,494 patients included, 50% were treated with ACEI/ARB and 38% with MRA. Kaplan-Meier survival was significantly better for patients receiving ACEI/ARB (p < 0.001) but not MRA (p = 0.31). In Cox proportional hazards analyses adjusted for known predictors of mortality following LVAD, ACEI/ARB use (hazard ratio 0.81 [95% confidence interval 0.71-0.93], p < 0.0001) but not MRA use (hazard ratio 1.03 [95% confidence interval 0.88-1.21], p = 0.69) was independently associated with lower mortality. Among patients treated with an ACEI/ARB, there was a significantly lower unadjusted risk of cardiovascular death (p < 0.001), risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.01), and creatinine level (p < 0.001). MRA therapy was associated with lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.01) but higher risk of hemolysis (p < 0.01). Potential limitations include residual confounding and therapy crossover. CONCLUSION These findings suggest a benefit for ACEI/ARB therapy in patients with heart failure after LVAD implantation.

Temporary left ventricular support aims to decompress the left ventricle and provide adequate forward flow into the arterial circulation. This can be accomplished with endovascular devices such as the Impella with an internal motor, or with the implementation of cannulae to drain the left ventricle or left atrium and then return to the arterial circulation using an external pump. In this report, the authors describe the transesophageal echocardiography-guided placement of a single-cannula system with the Protek Duo RD (TandemLife, LivaNova) via a left ventricular apical approach to provide minimally invasive left ventricular support in a high-risk Jehovah's Witness patient.

We previously reported the first successful implantation of the Heartmate 3TM in a Fontan patient. We now report his successful transplantation after 1,104 days of support, the longest reported bridge to transplantation of a Fontan patient. We describe our operative technique complicated by not only the Fontan anatomy and ventricular assist device (VAD) explanation but also a >10cm ascending and aortic arch aneurysm. Additionally, the post-transplant hemodynamics of this patient appear to demonstrate that effective VAD support may induce reversal of chronic effects of the failing Fontan circulation, which in this case was the elimination of his aorto-pulmonary collateral burden.

In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular aneurysm formation who are symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy, it is challenging to determine whether surgical ventricular reconstruction, heart transplantation, or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is the treatment of choice. This report describes the concept of surgical ventricular reconstruction with a specially prepared LVAD fixation ring to facilitate subsequent LVAD implantation if required. In the patient reported in this case, endoventricular circular LVAD ring plasty sufficiently reduced the ventricular volume, normalized the left ventricular geometry, and subsequently led to an improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction.

Few reports have described the implantation and management of an implantable ventricular assist device in patients with functional uni-ventricular anatomy. We herein report a case who underwent HVAD implantation due to severe cardiac dysfunction and Fontan failure in the remote period following total cavo-pulmonary connection. Double valve replacement was subsequently required one year later due to repeated Fontan failure caused by the progression of aortic and atrioventricular regurgitation. The low-profile and saddle-shaped sewing cuff design of the MITRIS were beneficial for avoiding the HVAD inflow and atrioventricular valve interference in the less-dilated ventricle.

The authors sought to examine the long-term cognitive outcome of patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD).Data on long-term neurocognitive outcome in LVAD are limited. We examined the neurocognitive outcome of patients who received a CF-LVAD as destination therapy.Patients with HeartWare (HVAD) and HeartMate II who were enrolled in the ENDURANCE and ENDURANCE Supplemental trials were eligible. Cognition was evaluated with neuropsychological testing preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months after implantation. General linear models identified demographic, disease, and treatment factors that predicted decline on each neurocognitive measure.Of 668 patients who completed baseline testing and at least 1 follow-up evaluation, 552 were impaired at baseline on at least 1 cognitive measure. At each follow-up, approximately 23% of tested patients declined and 20% improved relative to baseline on at least 1 cognitive measure. Of those who were intact at baseline, only 10%-12% declined in delayed memory and 11%-16% declined in executive function at all 3 follow-ups. For patients impaired at baseline, delayed memory decline was associated with the HVAD device and male sex, whereas executive function decline was associated with the HVAD device and stroke during CF-LVAD support. For patients intact at baseline, male sex and history of hypertension were associated with decline in immediate memory and executive function, respectively.Neurocognitive function remained stable or improved for most patients (∼80%) with CF-LVAD at 6, 12, and 24 months after implantation. Male sex, hypertension, HVAD, and stroke were associated with cognitive decline.

Importance Post-operative risk is increased with frail individuals undergoing cardiac surgery. Yet, there is no consensus for frailty assessment prior to durable left ventricular assist device (dLVAD) evaluation. Objective The objectives of this integrative review were to describe frailty measures, examine psychometrics of measures used, and identify variables related to frailty in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and dLVAD populations. Design, Setting, Participants PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase databases were searched for terms related to frailty, HFrEF and dLVAD that met inclusion criteria. Results Fourteen articles met inclusion criteria. Frailty was inconsistently defined. The Fried Phenotype Criteria was the most widely used approach to measurement. Validity was reported in all articles. Variables related to frailty included readmissions, higher mortality and increased adverse events. Conclusion There was variability in frailty definition and frailty measurement across studies. Further research in HFrEF and dLVAD populations is needed for frailty evaluation.

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation results in superior survival rates compared with optimal medical therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure. However, a potential complication of LVAD implantation is right heart failure (RHF), which can be devastating. Therefore, identifying preoperative risk factors for RHF and optimal management for these patients are critical for ensuring favorable postoperative outcomes. This review focuses on methods of assessing the risk factors for RHF before surgery, including evaluation of biomarkers, echocardiography, hemodynamics, risk-scoring systems, and existing conditions of right heart dysfunction. In addition, the review also explores the perioperative strategic approaches to reducing the likelihood of RHF.

Objective Aortic incompetence (AI) is observed to be accelerated in the continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) population and is related to increased mortality. Using computational fluid dynamics (CFD), we investigated the hemodynamic conditions related to the orientation of the LVAD outflow in these patients. Method We identified 10 patients with new aortic regurgitation, and 20 who did not, after LVAD implantation between 2009 and 2018. Three-dimensional models of patients' aortas were created from their computed tomography scans. The geometry of the LVAD outflow graft in relation to the aorta was quantified using azimuth angles (AA), polar angles (PAs), and distance from aortic root. The models were used to run CFD simulations, which calculated the pressures and wall shear stress (rWSS) exerted on the aortic root. Results The AA and PA were found to be similar. However, for combinations of high values of AA and low values of PA, there were no patients with AI. The distance from aortic root to the outflow graft was also smaller in patients who developed AI (3.39 ± 0.7 vs 4.07 ± 0.77 cm, P = .04). There was no significant difference in aortic root pressures in the 2 groups. The rWSS was greater in AI patients (4.60 ± 5.70 vs 2.37 ± 1.20 dyne/cm2, P Conclusions Using CFD simulations, we demonstrated that patients who developed de novo AI have greater rWSS at the aortic root, and their outflow grafts were placed closer to the aortic roots than those patients without de novo AI.

Background Given the shortage of suitable donor hearts for cardiac transplantation and the growing interest in donation after circulatory death (DCD), our institution recently began procuring cardiac allografts from DCD donors. Methods Between October 2020 and March 2021, 15 patients with heart failure underwent cardiac transplantation using DCD allografts. Allografts were procured using a modified extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit for thoracic normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) and were subsequently transported using cold static storage. Data collection and analysis were performed with institutional review board approval. Results The mean age of the DCD donors was 23 ± 7 years and average time on TA-NRP was 56 ± 8 minutes. Total ischemic time was 183 ± 31 minutes and distance from transplant center was 373 ± 203 nautical miles. Recipient age was 55 ± 14 years, with 8 (55.3%) recipients on durable left ventricular assist device support. Post-transplant, 6 (40%) recipients experienced mild left ventricle primary graft dysfunction (PGD-LV), 3 (20%) recipients experienced moderate PGD-LV, and no recipients experienced severe PGD-LV. Postoperative transthoracic echocardiogram demonstrated left ventricular ejection fraction >55% in all recipients. One recipient (6.6%) developed International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation 2R acute cellular rejection on first biopsy. At last follow-up, all 15 recipients were alive past 30-days. Conclusions Cardiac DCD provides an opportunity to increase the availability of donor hearts for transplantation. Utilizing TA-NRP with cold static storage, we have extended the cold ischemic time of DCD allografts to almost 3 hours, allowing for inter-hospital organ transport.

Kidney replacement therapy is required in up to one-third of patients after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement. A subset of these patients requires long-term maintenance hemodialysis and therefore needs durable vascular access but the ideal access in such patients has not been established. We present a series of 3 patients in whom arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) were successfully used for long-term kidney replacement therapy after LVAD placement. The maximum time from AVG placement to first successful AVG use was 40 days, and the longest AVG use duration was more than 2 years. 2 patients required AVG excision due to infection but both had successful placement of a second AVG. Total time on kidney replacement therapy was 993, 1,055, and 956 days for the 3 cases, of which dialysis catheter use was required for only 23%, 6.5%, and 27%, respectively. These cases suggest that AVG placement is a viable option for dialysis access in patients with LVADs.

BACKGROUND: Right heart catheterization for invasive hemodynamics has shown only modest correlation with clinical outcomes. We designed a novel hemodynamic variable that incorporates ventricular output and filling pressure. We anticipated that the aortic pulsatility index (API) would correlate with clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients undergoing right heart catheterization with milrinone drug study at our institution (February 2013 to November 2019). The API was calculated as (systolic blood pressure – diastolic blood pressure)/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. The primary outcome was freedom from advanced therapies, defined as the need for inotropes, temporary mechanical circulatory support, a left ventricular assist device, or orthotopic heart transplantation, or death at 30 days. A total of 224 patient encounters, age 57 years (48–66 years; 34% women; 31% ischemic cardiomyopathy) were included. In univariable analysis, lower baseline API was significantly associated with progression to advanced therapies or death at 30-days (odds ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.30–0.61; P < .001) compared with those on continued medical management. Receiver operator characteristic analysis specified an optimal cutpoint of 1.45 for API. A Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated an association of API with the primary outcome (79% for API ≥ 1.45 vs 48% for API < 1.45). In multivariable analysis, higher API was strongly associated with freedom from advanced therapies or death (odds ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.22–0.65, P ≤ .001), even when adjusted for baseline characteristics and routine right heart catheterization measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The API is a novel invasive hemodynamic measurement that is associated independently with freedom from advanced therapies or death at 30-day follow-up.

Background Pediatric heart transplant (HTx) recipients with congenital heart defects require complex concomitant surgical procedures with the risk of prolonging the allograft’s ischemic time. Ex vivo allograft perfusion with the Organ Care System (OCS; Transmedics, Andover, MA) may improve survival of these challenging patients. Methods In this retrospective, single-center study a consecutive series of 8 children with allografts preserved using the OCS was compared with 13 children after HTx with cold storage of the donor heart from March 2018 to March 2020. Results Median recipient age in the control group was 18 months (range, 1-189) versus 155 months (range, 83-214) in the OCS group, and the baseline differences between the 2 groups were not significant. Fifty percent of the children in the OCS group had complex congenital heart defects (vs 15% of the control subjects). Median operation time during HTx in the OCS group was 616 minutes (range, 270-809) versus 329 minutes (range, 283-617). Because of the time of ex vivo allograft perfusion (265 minutes [range, 202-372]) median total ischemia time was significantly shorter in the OCS group: 78 minutes (range, 52-111) versus 222 minutes (range, 74-326). The incidence of primary graft, renal, or hepatic failure did not differ between the groups. Graft function and the occurrence of any treated rejection at follow-up revealed no significant difference between the 2 groups. One-year survival was 88% in the OCS group (vs 85%). Conclusions Ex vivo allograft perfusion enabled complex pediatric HTx, yielding outcomes as positive as those of children whose donor hearts were stored in ice-cold solution.

Percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVAD) are frequently utilized in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) to provide hemodynamic support in patients with complex cardiovascular disease and/or multiple comorbidities who are poor candidates for surgical revascularization. Using the National Inpatient Sample we identified pVAD-assisted PCI (excluding intra-aortic balloon pump) in patients without cardiogenic shock from January 2008 to December 2018. We evaluated the trends in patient and procedural characteristics, and complication rates across the 11-year study period. A total of 26,661 pVAD-PCI was performed. From 2008 to 2018 there has was a 27-fold increase in the number of pVAD-PCIs performed annually. There has also been an increase in the proportion of procedures performed in small to medium sized hospitals. The use of atherectomy, image-guided PCI, FFR/iFR, drug-eluting stents, and multi-vessel intervention has significantly increased. Patients undergoing pVAD-PCI had a higher burden of comorbidities, without a significant difference in mortality over time. There were decreased rates of acute stroke and blood transfusions over time, while vascular complications and acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring dialysis remained mostly unchanged. In conclusion, the use of pVAD for HR-PCI has increased significantly, along with adjunctive PCI techniques such as atherectomy, intravascular imaging, and physiologic lesion assessment. With increasing use of this device, there appeared to be lower rates of peri-procedural stroke, and blood transfusions. Despite a higher burden of comorbidities, adjusted mortality remained stable over time.

Patients with advanced heart failure suffer from severe and persistent symptoms, often not responding disease-modifying drugs, a marked limitation of functional capacity and poor quality of life that can ameliorate with inotropic drugs therapy. In small studies, pulsed infusions of classical inotropes (ie, dobutamine and milrinone) are associated with improvement in hemodynamic parameters and quality of life in patients with advanced heart failure. However, because of the adverse effects of these drugs, serious safety issues have been raised. Levosimendan is a calcium-sensitizing inodilators with a triple mechanism of action, whose infusion results in hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and inflammatory cytokine improvements in patients with chronic advanced HF. In addition, levosimendan has important pleiotropic effects, including protection of myocardial, renal, and liver cells from ischemia-reperfusion injury, and anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects; these properties possibly make levosimendan an "organ protective" inodilator. In clinical trials and real-world evidence, infusion of levosimendan at fixed intervals is safe and effective in patients with advanced HF, alleviating clinical symptoms, reducing hospitalizations, and improving the quality of life. Therefore, the use of repeated doses of levosimendan could represent the therapy of choice as a bridge to transplant/left ventricular assist device implantation or as palliative therapy in patients with advanced heart failure.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are indicated in inotrope-dependent heart failure (HF) patients with pure or predominant LV dysfunction. Survival benefit is less clear in ambulatory, advanced HF. Timing is crucial: early, unnecessary exposure to the risks of surgery, and device-related complications (infections, stroke, and bleeding) should be weighed against the probability of dying or developing irreversible right ventricular and/or end-organ dysfunction while deferring implant. The interplay between LVAD and heart transplantation depends largely on donor availability and allocation rules. Postoperatively, quality of life depends on patients' expectations and is influenced by complications. Patients' preferences, prognosis, and alternative options-including palliation-should be openly discussed and reviewed before and after the operation.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) remain the standard of care in advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients for the prevention of sudden cardiac death. However, current guidelines remain conflicting with respect to the use of ICDs in patients supported with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD). The current review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies comparing the use of ICD in patients with CF-LVADs were included. The 2 primary outcomes studied were all-cause mortality, and a successful bridge to heart transplantation. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We also compared baseline characteristics between US and European studies, for CF-LVAD patients with an ICD. Among all studies, the use of an ICD was not associated with all-cause mortality in patients with CF-LVADs (OR: 0.85, 95% CIs: 0.64-1.12, p = 0.24). The presence of an ICD was associated with a trend towards increased likelihood of successful bridge to heart transplantation (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.0-1.3, p = 0.06). A subgroup analysis of studies published by European centers revealed a significant decrease in pooled mortality (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.4-0.83, p = 0.003) with the use of ICD, contrary to an increase in pooled mortality among studies published by US centers (OR: 1.2, 95% CI 1.02-1.33, p = 0.025). Moreover, we identified significant differences in baseline characteristics such as bridge to transplantation rate, Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profiles, and use of an intra-aortic balloon pump or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation preoperatively, between the US and European populations. While this meta-analysis did not show an overall survival benefit with the use of an ICD in CF-LVAD patients, it revealed significant differences in the derived benefit, in distinct patient populations. This might reflect differences in baseline patient characteristics and warrants further investigation.

Background This study employed machine learning approaches to analyze sequences of adverse events (AEs) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Methods Data on patients implanted with the HeartWare HVAD durable LVAD were extracted from the ENDURANCE and ENDURANCE Supplemental clinical trials, with follow-up through 5 years. Major AEs included device malfunction, major bleeding, major infection, neurological dysfunction, renal dysfunction, respiratory dysfunction, and right heart failure (RHF). Time interval and transition probability analyses were performed. We created a Sankey diagram to visualize transitions between AEs. Hierarchical clustering was applied to dissimilarity matrices based on the longest common subsequence to identify clusters of patients with similar AE profiles. Results A total of 568 patients underwent HVAD implantation with 3590 AEs. Bleeding and RHF comprised the highest proportion of early AEs after surgery whereas infection and bleeding accounted for most AEs occurring after 3 months. The highest transition probabilities were observed with infection to infection (0.34), bleeding to bleeding (0.31), RHF to bleeding (0.31), RHF to infection (0.28), and bleeding to infection (0.26). Five distinct clusters of patients were generated, each with different patterns of time intervals between AEs, transition rates between AEs, and clinical outcomes. Conclusions Machine learning approaches allow for improved visualization and understanding of AE burden after LVAD implantation. Distinct patterns and relationships provide insights that may be important for quality improvement efforts.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that children in the United States who were of racial and ethnic minorities have inferior waitlist and post-heart transplant (HT) outcomes. Whether these disparities still exist in the contemporary era of increased ventricular assist device use remains unknown. METHODS: All children (age

Objective To test the hypothesis that factor eight inhibitor bypassing activity (FEIBA) can be used to control bleeding following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation without increasing the 14-day composite thrombotic outcome of pump thrombus, ischemic cerebrovascular accidents, pulmonary embolism, and deep venous thrombosis. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic hospital. Participants Three hundred nineteen consecutive patients who underwent LVAD implantation (December 1, 2009 to December 30, 2018). Intervention FEIBA administered to control perioperative hemorrhage. Measurements and Main Results The 82 patients (25.7%) in the FEIBA cohort had more risk factors for perioperative hemorrhage, such as lower preoperative platelet count (169 ± 66 v 194 ± 68 × 103/mL, p = 0.004), prior cardiac surgery (36.6% v 21.9%, p = 0.008), and longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (100.3 v 75.2 minutes, p = 0.001) than the 237 controls. After 16.6 units (95% CI: 14.3-18.9) of blood products were given, 992 units (95% CI: 821-1163) of FEIBA were required to control bleeding in the FEIBA cohort. Compared to the controls, there were no differences in the 14-day composite thrombotic outcome (11.0% v 7.6%, p = 0.343) or mortality rate (3.7% v 1.3%, p = 0.179). Multivariate logistical regression identified preoperative international normalized ratio (odds ratio [OR]: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.04-1.62) and CPB time (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.02-1.20) as risk factors for 14-day thrombotic events, but FEIBA usage was not associated with an increased risk. Conclusions In this retrospective cohort study, the use of FEIBA (∼1,000 units, ∼13 units/kg) to control perioperative hemorrhage following LVAD implantation was not associated with increases in mortality or composite thrombotic outcome.

Background Myocarditis is a potentially fatal condition that can be misdiagnosed in the emergency department (ED) setting. Objective The purpose of this narrative review article is to provide a summary of the background, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of myocarditis, with a focus on emergency clinicians. Discussion Myocarditis occurs when inflammation of the heart musculature causes cardiac dysfunction. Symptoms may range from mild to severe and are often preceded by a viral prodrome. Laboratory assessment and an electrocardiogram can be helpful for the diagnosis, but echocardiography is the ideal test in the ED setting. Some patients may also require advanced imaging, though this will often occur during hospitalization or follow-up. Treatment is primarily focused on respiratory and hemodynamic support. Initial hemodynamic management includes vasopressors and inotropes, whereas more severe cases may require an intra-aortic balloon pump, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or a ventricular assist device. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be avoided while intravenous immunoglobulin is controversial. Conclusion Myocarditis is a serious condition with the potential for significant morbidity and mortality. It is important for clinicians to be aware of the current evidence regarding the diagnosis, management, and disposition of these patients.

Background Historically, obesity was considered a relative contraindication to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation with less invasive surgery (LIS). The present study aimed to compare the outcomes of obese patients who underwent LVAD implantation through LIS with those who received full sternotomy (FS) implantation. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients implanted with HeartMate 3 LVAD in our institution between September 2015 and June 2020. Obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 ) were included and dichotomized based on surgical approach into the FS or LIS cohort. Results Of 231 implanted patients, 107 (46%) were obese and included in the study. FS was performed in 26 (24%) patients and LIS approach in 81 (76%) patients. Preoperative patient characteristics were similar between the cohorts. Postoperatively, patients in LIS cohort had less bleeding (p = 0.029), fewer transfusions (p = 0.042), shorter duration of inotropic support ( p = 0.049), and decreased incidence of severe RV failure (11.1% vs 30.8%, p = 0.028). Survival to discharge for the obese population was 87.5% overall and did not differ based on an approach (91.4% LIS vs 76.9% FS, p = 0.079). More LIS patients were discharged home (60.0% vs 82.4%, p = 0.041) rather than to rehabilitation center . Conclusion Our results showed that the LIS approach in obese patients is associated with fewer postoperative complications and a trend towards better short-term survival. These results suggest that less invasive LVAD implantation is a safe and effective approach for obese patients. Future prospective randomized trials are required to substantiate these results.