1. Coordinated innate and T-cell immune responses in mild COVID-19 patients from household contacts of COVID-19 cases during the first pandemic wave.
- Author
-
Aiello A, Grossi A, Meschi S, Meledandri M, Vanini V, Petrone L, Casetti R, Cuzzi G, Salmi A, Altera AM, Pierelli L, Gualano G, Ascoli Bartoli T, Castilletti C, Agrati C, Girardi E, Palmieri F, Nicastri E, Di Rosa E, and Goletti D
- Subjects
- Chemokine CXCL10, Humans, Immunity, Interferon-alpha, Pandemics, SARS-CoV-2, T-Lymphocytes, COVID-19
- Abstract
Objective: To better define the immunopathogenesis of COVID-19, the present study aims to characterize the early immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection in household contacts of COVID-19 cases. In particular, innate, T- and B-cell specific responses were evaluated over time., Methods: Household contacts of COVID-19 cases screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection by nasopharyngeal swab for surveillance purposes were enrolled (T0, n=42). Of these, 28 subjects returned for a follow-up test (T1). The innate response was assessed by detecting a panel of soluble factors by multiplex-technology in plasma samples. Cell-mediated response was evaluated by measuring interferon (IFN)-γ levels by ELISA in plasma harvested from whole-blood stimulated with SARS-CoV-2 peptide pools, including spike (S), nucleocapsid (N) and membrane (M) proteins. The serological response was assessed by quantifying anti-Receptor-Binding-Domain (RBD), anti-Nucleocapsid (N), whole virus indirect immunofluorescence, and neutralizing antibodies., Results: At T0, higher levels of plasmatic IFN-α, IL-1ra, MCP-1 and IP-10, and lower levels of IL-1β, IL-9, MIP-1β and RANTES were observed in subjects with positive swab compared to individuals with a negative one (p<0.05). Plasmatic IFN-α was the only cytokine detectable in subjects with positive SARS-CoV-2 swabs with high accuracy for swab score positivity (0.93, p<0.0001). Among subjects with positive swabs, significant negative correlations were found among the RT-PCR cycle threshold values reported for genes S and N and IFN-α or IP-10 levels. At T0, the IFN-γ T-cell specific response was detected in 50% (5/10) of subjects with positive swab, while anti-RBD/anti-N antibodies showed a positivity rate of 10% (1/10). At T1, the IFN-γ T-cell specific response was detected in most of the confirmed-infection subjects (77.8%, 7/9), whereas the serological response was still observed in a minority of them (44.4%, 4/9). Overall, the swab test showed a moderate concordance with the T-cell response (78.6%, k=0.467), and a scarce concordance with the serological one (72.9%, k=0.194)., Conclusions: Plasmatic IFN-α and the IFN-γ T-cell specific response appear early even in the absence of seroconversion, and show a greater positivity rate than the serological response in household contacts with positive swab., Competing Interests: EG has received grants form Gilead and Mylan. EN is a member of the advisory board by Gilead, Lilly and Roche and received fees for educational training by Gilead, Lilly and Roche. DG is a member of the advisory board by Biomerieux and Eli-Lilly, and received fees for educational training or consultancy by Biogen, Cellgene, Diasorin, Janssen, Qiagen, Quidel. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Aiello, Grossi, Meschi, Meledandri, Vanini, Petrone, Casetti, Cuzzi, Salmi, Altera, Pierelli, Gualano, Ascoli Bartoli, Castilletti, Agrati, Girardi, Palmieri, Nicastri, Di Rosa and Goletti.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF