Search

The article discusses the court case Tristian Moore v. Horseshoe Casino presented at the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, East Division, wherein Moore and his friends were accused of stealing money and were banned from the Horseshoe casino. Moore, the plaintiff, denied the accusations against him, and brought claims for libel and slander. The court reviewed the issue and the plaintiff's application to proceed in Forma Pauperis was granted.

The article discusses the court case New Gaming Systems, Inc. vs. National Indian Gaming Commission in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. The dispute stems from an equipment lease and promisory note New Gaming Systems (NGS), the Nation and Enterprise executed in conjunction with the construction and operation of a casino. The court concluded that the agency's decision should be affirmed.

The article discusses a court case wherein plaintiff, a high stakes gambler, filed a complaint against defendants for maliciously initiating bad check charges against him in the Las Vegas Township Justice Court. The U.S. District Court District of Nevada examined the facts of the case regarding the motion for judgment on partial findings of one of the defendants on charges of malicious prosecution order.

The article discusses a court case wherein the plaintiff filed a complaint against his former employer, Casino Queen, Inc., alleging discrimination due to race, African American, during his employment and subjection to racially hostile work environment. It discusses arguments before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois on the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant.

The article discusses the decision by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in John Wajcman and Charles Ashmore v. Investment Corp. of Palm Beach in March 2008. The court denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment. It found a genuine issue of material fact on the contingent question of whether the Palm Beach Kennel Club improperly took a tip credit under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The article discusses the decision by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana in Simon W. Ford v. Argosy Casino Lawrenceburg in March 2008. This case questioned whether a riverboat casino that is indefinitely moored to the shore is a vessel in navigation for purposes of the federal Jones Act. Ford sought damages under the act and other maritime doctrines for injuries he sustained while working at the casino. The court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant Indiana Gaming Co. LP on all of Ford's claims.

The article discusses the court case of Craig Gamble, et al v. Boyd Gaming Corporation and the appeal to settle the case. It provides details about the motion to settle that was reached via a mediation between the parties. It includes the final order to the Plaintiffs to submit a copy of the approval for settlement to the Nevada District Court magistrates' chambers.