Search

To assess long-term outcomes with robotic versus laparoscopic/thoracoscopic and open surgery for colorectal, urologic, endometrial, cervical, and thoracic cancers.Minimally invasive surgery provides perioperative benefits and similar oncological outcomes compared with open surgery. Recent robotic surgery data have questioned long-term benefits.A systematic review and meta-analysis of cancer outcomes based on surgical approach was conducted based on PRISMA guidelines using Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase. HRs for recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were extracted/estimated using a hierarchical decision-tree and pooled in RevMan 5.4 using inverse-variance fixed effect (heterogeneity non-significant) or random effect models.Of 31,204 references, 199 were included (7 randomized, 23 database, 15 prospective, 154 retrospective studies)-157,876 robotic, 68,007 laparoscopic/thoracoscopic, and 234,649 open cases. Cervical cancer: OS and DFS were similar between robotic and laparoscopic (1.01[0.56, 1.80], P=0.98) or open (1.18[0.99, 1.41], P=0.06) surgery; two papers reported less recurrence with open surgery (2.30[1.32, 4.01], P=0.003). Endometrial cancer: the only significant result favored robotic over open surgery (OS; 0.77[0.71, 0.83], P0.001). Lobectomy: DFS favored robotic over thoracoscopic surgery (0.74[0.59, 0.93], P=0.009); OS favored robotic over open surgery (0.93[0.87, 1.00], P=0.04). Prostatectomy: recurrence was less with robotic versus laparoscopic surgery (0.77[0.68, 0.87], P0.0001); OS favored robotic over open surgery (0.78[0.72, 0.85], P0.0001). Low-anterior resection: OS significantly favored robotic over laparoscopic (0.76[0.63, 0.91], P=0.004) and open surgery (0.83[0.74, 0.93], P=0.001).Long-term outcomes were similar for robotic versus laparoscopic/thoracoscopic and open surgery, with no safety signal or indication requiring further research (PROSPERO Reg#CRD42021240519).

Introduction: Presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is known to increase mortality and impact cardiovascular(CV) outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients (pts) with preserved systolic function (pEF) but its causes are unknown Hypothesis: We hypothesized that AF presentation & clinical factors impact mode of death & CV outcomes of HFpEF pts in the TOPCAT AMERICAS trial. Methods: We analyzed demographic, clinical, ECG and AF presentation as predictors of CV mortality, sudden death( SCD) and pump failure death(PFD). We examined two AF presentations 1. Pts in sinus rhythm (SR, n=1319) compared to pts in AF (n=446) on ECG at study entry or 2. Pts with no AF event by history or ECG ( n=1007 ) compared to those with any AF event (n=760 ) during a mean follow up period of 2.9 years(yrs). Results: AF pts when compared to the rest of the study population were more likely to be older, male, Caucasian origin, have more alcohol use, diabetes, percutaneous coronary interventions. 5 yr CV mortality was higher in pts with AF on ECG (30%) than those in sinus rhythm (18%, p=0.014) but 5 yr SCD was lower (10% in AF on ECG & 7% in any AF) & comparable to SR (7% & 9% respectively, p=ns). 5 yr PFD was higher (13%) than SR (5%, p=0.007. )Table shows Cox proportional hazards analysis of covariates associated with time to CV death, time to SCD & time to PFD adjusted for baseline imbalances. Conclusions:: 1. CV death risk in HFpEF pts increased with age, in minorities, smokers, diabetics, with lower systolic bp, elevated heart rate & AF on ECG.. 2. SCD was more frequent in males, African Americans & diabetics but was low in both AF & SR, perhaps due to a dominant atrial & limited ventricular arrhythmogenic substrate in HFpEF. 3. PFD in HFpEF increased with age, ECG recorded AF & elevated heart rate.This may reflect importance of atrioventricular synchrony in HFpEF. 4. The recording of AF on ECG at study entry was more strongly associated with CV death & PFD, possibly due to greater AF burden in this group compared to those with any AF even..

Background The interscalene nerve block provides analgesia for shoulder surgery, but is associated with diaphragm paralysis. One solution may be performing brachial plexus blocks more distally. This noninferiority study evaluated analgesia for blocks at the supraclavicular and anterior suprascapular levels, comparing them individually to the interscalene approach. Methods One hundred-eighty-nine subjects undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery were recruited to this double-blind trial and randomized to interscalene, supraclavicular, or anterior suprascapular block using 15 ml, 0.5% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was numeric rating scale pain scores analyzed using noninferiority testing. The predefined noninferiority margin was one point on the 11-point pain scale. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption and pulmonary assessments. Results All subjects completed the study through the primary outcome analysis. Mean pain after surgery was: interscalene = 1.9 (95% CI, 1.3 to 2.5), supraclavicular = 2.3 (1.7 to 2.9), suprascapular = 2.0 (1.4 to 2.6). The primary outcome, mean pain score difference of supraclavicular–interscalene was 0.4 (–0.4 to 1.2; P = 0.088 for noninferiority) and of suprascapular–interscalene was 0.1 (–0.7 to 0.9; P = 0.012 for noninferiority). Secondary outcomes showed similar opioid consumption with better preservation of vital capacity in the anterior suprascapular group (90% baseline [P < 0.001]) and the supraclavicular group (76% [P = 0.002]) when compared to the interscalene group (67%). Conclusions The anterior suprascapular block, but not the supraclavicular, provides noninferior analgesia compared to the interscalene approach for major arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Pulmonary function is best preserved with the anterior suprascapular nerve block.

Adductor canal blocks have shown promise in reducing postoperative pain in total knee arthroplasty patients. No randomized, controlled studies, however, evaluate the opioid-sparing benefits of a continuous 0.2% ropivacaine infusion at the adductor canal. We hypothesized that a continuous adductor canal block would decrease postoperative opioid consumption.Eighty subjects presenting for primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty were randomized to receive either a continuous ultrasound-guided adductor canal block with 0.2% ropivacaine or a sham catheter. All subjects received a preoperative single-injection femoral nerve block with spinal anesthesia as is standard of care at our institution. Cumulative IV morphine consumption 48 hours after surgery was evaluated with analysis of covariance, adjusted for baseline characteristics. Secondary outcomes included resting pain scores (numeric rating scale), peak pain scores during physical therapy on postoperative days 1 and 2, quadriceps maximum voluntary isometric contraction, distance ambulated during physical therapy, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and satisfaction with analgesia.Eighty subjects were randomized, and 76 completed the study per-protocol. The least-square mean difference in cumulative morphine consumption over 48 hours (block-sham) was--16.68 mg (95% confidence interval, -29.78 to -3.59, P = 0.013). Total morphine use between 24 and 48 hours (after predicted femoral nerve block resolution) also differed by least-square mean -11.17 mg (95% confidence interval,: -19.93 to -2.42, P = 0.013). Intention-to-treat analysis was similar to the per-protocol results. Functional outcomes revealed subjects in the adductor canal catheter group had better quadriceps strength (P = 0.010) and further distance ambulated (P = 0.034) on postoperative day 2.A continuous adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty reduces opioid consumption compared with that of placebo in the first 48 hours after surgery. Other outcomes including quadriceps strength, distance ambulated, and pain scores all show benefit from an adductor canal catheter after total knee arthroplasty but require further study before being interpreted as conclusive.

Background Metabolic syndrome increases risk for atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, and its prevalence increases with increasing age and body mass index. Adults with congenital heart disease ( ACHD ) are now living longer and accruing coronary artery disease risk factors. However, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in ACHD patients is unknown. Methods and Results We conducted a retrospective cohort study of ACHD patients at our center to quantify the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in an ACHD population. Using case‐control matching, we constructed a comparable control group from a population‐based sample of 150 104 adults. International Diabetes Federation criteria were used to define metabolic syndrome. We used logistic regression to compare the risk of metabolic syndrome across the resulting cohorts, which were composed of 448 ACHD patients and 448 controls matched by age and sex. Mean age of both groups was 32.4±11.3 years, and 51.3% were female. Obesity was present in 16.1% of the ACHD patients and 16.7% of the controls. Metabolic syndrome was more common in ACHD patients than in controls (15.0% versus 7.4%; odds ratio 1.82, 95% CI 1.25–2.65). Conclusions Our data suggest that metabolic syndrome is more common among adults with congenital heart disease than in the general population. Thus, patients with congenital heart disease should be screened for metabolic syndrome and risk factors mitigated where possible to prevent atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Preventive cardiology should be included during routine ACHD care.

Introduction: Stable organized atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) /"rotors" that maintain AF have been identified in patients (pts) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) & persistent AF (PRAF) with no or minimal heart disease. Hypothesis: Biatrial ATs occur in AF pts with systolic heart failure (HF). Methods: We performed simultaneous contact catheter mapping of the RA & LA using 3 D non-contact mapping ) in 83 refractory AF pts during spontaneous AF episodes.Spontaneous atrial premature beats (APBs) & triggered ATs were analyzed. We also compared regional distribution of ATs & activation patterns in pts with & without HF. Results: 24 HF pts, mean age of 62±9 years, 75% male with mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 45.5±9% and mean left atrial (LA) size 4.35±0.8 cm were mapped. They had 42 APBs that triggered 26 distinct organized stable ATs/"rotors". Each pt had 1 to 4 RA or LA regions showing triggering APBs (mean 1.75/pt) initiating AT. APBs arose predominantly from the RA or LA septum (45%) & superior LA/PV (24%) regions (Fig 1a). A biatrial distribution of the stable ATs/"rotors" occcurred in HF pts (Fig 1b) with few focal ATs. Compared to pts without HF (n=59), HF pts (n=24) trended to have more PRAF (83% vs 66%, p=0.18). 78 organized stable ATs/"rotors" were compared for regional distribution in PRAF pts with HF (n=16) & without HF (n=32). Stable ATs with focal LA/PV origin were uncommon in both groups (7% vs. 15%). LA ATs/"rotors" were similar (26% vs. 17%; p=0.58) as were typical RA flutter and atypical RA ATs/"rotors" in both groups (Fig 1c). Conclusions: 1. A majority of APBs initiating AF in HF pts originated from the septal and superior LA/PV regions. 2. While triggers are still frequently present with the LA/PV origin in HF pts, stable ATs/"rotors" had biatrial distribution & a lesser frequency of focal LA/PV ATs. 3. This spectrum of ATs/"rotors" was similar to PRAF pts without HF, potentially supporting similar ablative interventions in both pt groups.