Search

The immunosuppressant drug tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic index and is subject to a large variation in individual bioavailability and clearance. With its narrow therapeutic index, therapeutic drug monitoring is standard clinical practice in the management of transplant recipients. In this study, we report the evaluation of the cloned enzyme donor immunoassay (CEDIA) for the determination of whole-blood tacrolimus concentrations compared with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) and microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) using samples obtained from liver (n = 100) and renal (n = 88) transplant recipients. Linear regression analysis showed a relationship of CEDIA = 1.24 HPLC-MS/MS -0.18 (r = 0.81). The mean bias (+/-SEM) for all patients when compared with HPLC-MS/MS was 22.2% (+/-2.1%). The precision of the CEDIA method for all samples showed a root mean square error of 3.1 microg/L. Liver transplant recipient samples showed a mean (+/-SEM) bias compared with HPLC-MS/MS of 12.5% (+/-1.6%). The precision of the CEDIA method for these samples showed a root mean square error of 1.5 microg/L. The data suggest that in the renal transplant group, the CEDIA and MEIA methods have a bias of 33.3% and 20.1%, respectively, compared with HPLC-MS/MS. The CEDIA tacrolimus immunoassay has been shown to be a rapid method for the determination of whole-blood tacrolimus concentrations and may be considered when HPLC-MS/MS is not available. When used in the clinical setting with other parameters, it would be a useful adjunct in the management of liver transplant recipients, but a significant bias in renal transplant patients needs to be further investigated.

Background— Numerous in vitro studies suggest that sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), a bioactive lysosphingolipid associated with high-density lipoproteins, accounts at least partly for the potent antiinflammatory properties of high-density lipoprotein and, thereby, contributes to the antiatherogenic potential attributed to high-density lipoproteins. The present study was undertaken to investigate whether modulation of S1P signaling would affect atherosclerosis in a murine model of disease. Methods and Results— Low-density lipoprotein receptor–deficient mice on a cholesterol-rich diet were given FTY720, a synthetic S1P analogue, at low (0.04 mg/kg per day) or high (0.4 mg/kg per day) doses for 16 weeks. FTY720 dose-dependently reduced atherosclerotic lesion formation, both in the aortic root and brachiocephalic artery, and almost completely blunted necrotic core formation. Plasma lipids remained unchanged during the course of FTY720 treatment. However, FTY720 lowered blood lymphocyte count (at a high dose) and significantly interfered with lymphocyte function, as evidenced by reduced splenocyte proliferation and interferon-γ levels in plasma. Plasma concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-12, and regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted were reduced by FTY720 administration. Moreover, lipopolysaccharide-elicited generation of nitrite/nitrate and IL-6—two markers of classical (M1) macrophage activation—was inhibited, whereas IL-4–induced production of IL-1–receptor antagonist, a marker of alternative (M2) macrophage activation, was augmented in peritoneal macrophages from FTY720-treated low-density lipoprotein receptor–deficient mice. Conclusions— The present results demonstrate that an S1P analogue inhibits atherosclerosis by modulating lymphocyte and macrophage function, and these results are consistent with the notion that S1P contributes to the antiatherogenic potential of high-density lipoprotein.

Therapeutic monitoring with dosage individualization of sirolimus drug therapy is standard clinical practice for organ transplant recipients. For several years sirolimus monitoring has been restricted as a result of lack of an immunoassay. The recent reintroduction of the microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA (R)) for sirolimus on the IMx (R) analyser has the potential to address this situation. This Study, using patient samples, has compared the MEIA (R) sirolimus method with an established HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry method (HPLC-MS/MS). An established HPLC-UV assay was used for independent cross-validation. For quality control materials (5, 11, 22 mu g/L), the MEIA (R) showed acceptable validation criteria based on intra-and inter-run precision (CV) and accuracy (bias) of < 8% and < 13%, respectively. The lower limit of quantitation was found to be approximately 3 mu g/L. The performance of the immunoassay was compared with HPLC-MS/MS using EDTA whole-blood samples obtained from various types of organ transplant recipients (n = 116). The resultant Deming regression line was: MEIA = 1.3 x HPLC-MS/MS+ 1.3 (r = 0.967, s(y/x) = 1) with a mean bias of 49.2% +/- 23.1 % (range, -2.4% to 128%; P < 0.001). The reason for the large and variable bias was not explored in this study, but the sirolimus-metabolite cross-reactivity with the MEIA (R) antibody could be a substantive contributing factor. Whereas the MEIA (R) sirolimus method may be an adjunct to sirolimus dosage individualization in transplant recipients, users must consider the implications of the substantial and variable bias when interpreting results. In selected patients where difficult clinical issues arise, reference to a specific chromatographic method may be required.

The effects of storage time (0-8 days), temperature (4 degrees C and 30 degrees C in dark and light), and freeze-thaw cycles on the stability of sirolimus in blood were examined. Sirolimus quantification was undertaken using HPLC-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry. Whole blood samples supplemented with sirolimus (5.0, 15.0, and 30.0 microg/L) and pooled renal and heart transplant samples were found to be stable during the 8 days under all conditions (10% decrease in concentration). No significant difference was observed in sirolimus concentration between freshly collected patient samples and sirolimus-supplemented samples (5.0, 15.0, and 30.0 microg/L) after three freeze-thaw cycles (p0.198). In conclusion, blood samples can be transported with or without cooling for up to 8 days without sirolimus results being compromised. The reanalysis of sirolimus samples, which may entail freeze-thaw cycles, can be undertaken if the number of cycles is three or less.

The accuracy and imprecision of three assays used for therapeutic monitoring of tacrolimus were tested using blood-containing weighed-in amounts of the drug, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA I), and a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS2) assay. Accuracy was acceptable for the HPLC-MS2 assay at all concentrations tested (10% deviation) and for the ELISA at 1.0 and 4.0 microg/l. Accuracy was not acceptable for the ELISA at 15.0 and 50.0 microg/l or for the MEIA I at all concentrations tested. Imprecision was acceptable for the HPLC-MS2 assay at all concentrations tested (coefficient of variation10%), for the ELISA at 15.0 and 50.0 microg/l, and for the MEIA I at 15.0 and 50.0 microg/l. Imprecision was not acceptable for the ELISA at 1.0 and 4.0 microg/l or for the MEIA I at 1.0 and 4.0 microg/l. This assessment with weighed-in amounts of tacrolimus verified the HPLC-MS2 assay as a reference method. The performance of the two immunoassays with HPLC-MS2 was then compared in the clinical setting using blood from patients with liver (n = 30) and renal (n = 37) transplants. In the liver transplant group (127 samples), the range of tacrolimus concentrations measured by HPLC-MS2, ELISA, and MEIA I was 1.9 to 31.8, 2.1 to 35.0, and less than 0.1 to 36.5 mg/l, respectively. In the renal transplant group (129 samples), the ranges were 1.7 to 26.1, 1.9 to 24.4, and 0.9 to 28.5 microg/l, respectively. Compared with the HPLC-MS2, the ELISA had minimal bias (0.1 to 0.2 microg/l) but unacceptable variability in values (SD13%). The MEIA I had unacceptable bias (1.7-1.8 microg/l) and variability (SD23%). These data indicated that neither the ELISA nor MEIA I is interchangeable with HPLC-MS2. Moreover, in view of the current trend to reduce the therapeutic dose of tacrolimus, quantitative results using the MEIA I would not be obtainable during therapeutic drug monitoring in some patients in whom effective therapeutic concentrations can be less than 5.0 microg/l.

Conflicting conclusions have been drawn from comparisons of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and the Abbott Diagnostics monoclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay (mFPIA) for cyclosporin. The aim of this study was to compare whole blood cyclosporin A (CsA) concentrations measured by both mFPIA and HPLC in liver and heart transplant patients. One hundred and twenty-four liver and 62 heart transplant patient samples were assayed by both methods. Assay imprecision for both methods during the studies was < 7% over the range 150-800 micrograms/L. At an HPLC-determined concentration of 100 micrograms/L, mFPIA overestimated CsA by 60% (liver) and 77% (heart). At 300 micrograms/L, the overestimation was 40% (liver) and 45% (heart). On this basis, the mFPIA is not interchangeable with HPLC.