Search

In everyday life, information from different cognitive domains—such as visuospatial attention, alertness and inhibition—needs to be integrated between different brain regions. Early models suggested that completely segregated brain networks control these three cognitive domains. However, more recent accounts, mainly based on neuroimaging data in healthy participants, indicate that different tasks lead to specific patterns of activation within the same, higher-order and 'multiple-demand' network. If so, then a lesion to critical substrates of this common network should determine a concomitant impairment in all three cognitive domains. The aim of the present study was to critically investigate this hypothesis, i.e. to identify focal stroke lesions within the network that can concomitantly affect visuospatial attention, alertness and inhibition. We studied an unselected sample of 60 first-ever right-hemispheric, subacute stroke patients using a data-driven, bottom-up approach. Patients performed 12 standardized neuropsychological and oculomotor tests, four per cognitive domain. A principal component analysis revealed a strong relationship between all three cognitive domains: 10 of 12 tests loaded on a first, common component. Analysis of the neuroanatomical lesion correlates using different approaches (i.e. voxel-based and tractwise lesion-symptom mapping, disconnectome maps) provided convergent evidence on the association between severe impairment of this common component and lesions at the intersection of superior longitudinal fasciculus II and III, frontal aslant tract and, to a lesser extent, the putamen and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus. Moreover, patients with a lesion involving this region were significantly more impaired in daily living cognition, which provides an ecological validation of our results. A probabilistic functional atlas of the multiple-demand network was performed to confirm the potential relationship between patients' lesion substrates and observed cognitive impairments as a function of the multiple-demand network connectivity disruption. These findings show, for the first time, that a lesion to a specific white matter crossroad can determine a concurrent breakdown in all three considered cognitive domains. Our results support the multiple-demand network model, proposing that different cognitive operations depend on specific collaborators and their interaction, within the same underlying neural network. Our findings also extend this hypothesis by showing (i) the contribution of superior longitudinal fasciculus and frontal aslant tract to the multiple-demand network; and (ii) a critical neuroanatomical intersection, crossed by a vast amount of long-range white matter tracts, many of which interconnect cortical areas of the multiple-demand network. The vulnerability of this crossroad to stroke has specific cognitive and clinical consequences; this has the potential to influence future rehabilitative approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the importance of studying brain anatomy and behavior in order to understand the relationship between the two. The authors agree with the idea that brain anatomy should be used as a tool for developing concepts about brain function, but emphasize that observing behavior is a necessary step in establishing anatomo-functional relations. The study presented in the article contributes causal evidence to the model of the multiple-demand network in the neurotypical brain, suggesting that different cognitive operations depend on the activity of a higher-order network. The authors also provide a connectogram showing the fibers running through the observed lesion clusters, further supporting their main conclusion. They argue against a simple ventral/dorsal dichotomy in brain systems and propose that separate cognitive functions emerge from the integrated functioning of distant brain areas supported by long-range white matter tracts. The article concludes by highlighting the contributions of Jules Dejerine and Augusta Dejerine-Klumpke in identifying and characterizing white matter tracts and emphasizing the importance of continuing to advance knowledge in this area. [Extracted from the article]

Spatial neglect is a strong and negative predictor of general functional outcome after stroke, and its therapy remains a challenge. Whereas inhibitory non-invasive brain stimulation over the contralesional, intact hemisphere has generally been shown to ameliorate neglect on a group level, a conspicuous variability of the effects at the individual level is typically observed. We aimed to assess the characteristics and determinants of the effects of inhibitory non-invasive brain stimulation in neglect, identifying which patients would respond to this therapeutic approach and which not. To this end, we prospectively included 60 patients with a subacute right-hemispheric stroke. In 30 patients with spatial neglect, continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) was applied over the left posterior parietal cortex in a randomized clinical trial, either in eight or 16 trains, or as sham stimulation. Thirty patients without neglect served as a control group. Neglect severity was measured with a neuropsychological test battery and the Catherine Bergego Scale, at admission to and at discharge from inpatient neurorehabilitation, as well as at 3 months follow-up. General functional outcome was assessed by means of the Functional Independence Measure and the Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale. The impact of clinical and demographic factors was evaluated, and the influence of lesion location and extension was assessed by means of voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. On a group level, both cTBS protocols (i.e. eight and 16 trains) significantly reduced neglect severity in both the Catherine Bergego Scale and the neuropsychological tests, at discharge and 3 months later. Furthermore, cTBS significantly improved general functional outcome. On an individual level, hierarchical cluster and voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping analyses revealed that the variability in the responses to cTBS is determined by the integrity of interhemispheric connections within the corpus callosum, in particular parieto-parietal connections. In cTBS responders, in whom neglect and general functional outcome were significantly improved, the corpus callosum was intact, whereas this was not the case in cTBS non-responders. Moreover, analyses based on the proportional recovery rule and the Maugeri predictive stroke recovery model showed that the recovery of neglect and of the activities of daily living was accelerated only in cTBS responders. Furthermore, the level of activities of daily living recovery of these neglect patients was brought close to the one of right-hemispheric control patients without neglect. Hence, in neglect patients with intact interhemispheric connectivity, cTBS over the contralesional posterior parietal cortex significantly improves and accelerates neglect recovery and, associated with it, general functional outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]