1. Sex-specific enlarged vestibular aqueduct morphology and audiometry.
- Author
-
Ruthberg J, Ascha MS, Kocharyan A, Gupta A, Murray GS, Megerian CA, and Otteson TD
- Subjects
- Child, Differential Threshold, Female, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural etiology, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Retrospective Studies, Tertiary Care Centers, Time Factors, Audiometry, Hearing, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural pathology, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural physiopathology, Sex Characteristics, Vestibular Aqueduct abnormalities, Vestibular Aqueduct pathology
- Abstract
Objective: Enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct (EVA) is one of the most common congenital malformations in pediatric patients presenting with sensorineural or mixed hearing loss. The relationship between vestibular aqueduct (VA) morphology and hearing loss across sex is not well characterized. This study assesses VA morphology and frequency-specific hearing thresholds with sex as the primary predictor of interest., Materials and Methods: A retrospective, longitudinal, and repeated-measures study was used. 47 patients at an academic tertiary care center with hearing loss and a record of CT scan of the internal auditory canal were candidates, and included upon meeting EVA criteria after confirmatory measurements of vestibular aqueduct midpoint and operculum widths. Audiometric measures included pure-tone average and frequency-specific thresholds., Results: Of the 47 patients (23 female and 24 male), 79 total ears were affected by EVA; the median age at diagnosis was 6.60 years. After comparing morphological measurements between sexes, ears from female patients were observed to have a greater average operculum width (3.25 vs. 2.70 mm for males, p = 0.006) and a greater average VA midpoint width (2.80 vs. 1.90 mm for males, p = 0.004). After adjusting for morphology, male patients' ears had pure-tone average thresholds 17.6 dB greater than female patients' ears (95% CI, 3.8 to 31.3 dB)., Conclusions: Though females seem to have greater enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct, this difference does not extend to hearing loss. Therefore, our results indicate that criteria for EVA diagnoses may benefit from re-evaluation. Further exploration into morphological and audiometric discrepancies across sex may help inform both clinician and patient expectations., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF