1. 血清生长分化因子 15 与出血评分联合应用 对冠心病患者 PCI 治疗后出血的预测效能.
- Author
-
王昱冕, 邹继宏, 陈涵, 张黎, 柳民, 崔芸, 王红, and 宋莹
- Abstract
Objective To analyze the predictive efficacy of serum growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) in combination with the bleeding score on bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods Totally 225 CAD patients were divided into the bleeding group (31 patients) and non-bleeding group (194 patients) according to whether they bled after PCI treatment, and the serum GDF-15 levels and bleeding scores (HAS-BLED bleeding score and CRUSADE bleeding score) of the two groups were compared. Multi-factor Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors and risk factors for bleeding after PCI treatment in CAD patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to examine the predictive efficacy of serum GDF-15, HAS-BLED bleeding score, and CRUSADE bleeding score alone and in combination on bleeding after PCI treatment in CAD patients. Results Significant differences were found in the proportion of women, serum GDF-15 levels, HASBBLED bleeding score, and CRUSADE bleeding score between the bleeding and non-bleeding groups (all P<0. 05). Multifactorial Logistic regression analysis showed that serum GDF-15 level [OR (95%CI) =13. 408 (3. 130 to 57. 442), P= 0. 000], HAS-BLED bleeding score [OR (95%CI) =2. 394 (1. 313 to 4. 364), P=0. 004], and CRUSADE bleeding score [OR (95%CI) =1. 065 (1. 010 to 1. 123), P=0. 019)] were associated with bleeding events. When the critical value of serum GDF-15 was 2 467. 61 pg/mL, its predictive sensitivity for bleeding after PCI treatment in CAD patients was 51. 6%, specificity was 86. 1%, and area under ROC was 0. 720 (95%CI: 0. 623 to 0. 817, P<0. 05); when the critical value of HAS-BLED bleeding score was 2, its predictive sensitivity for bleeding after PCI treatment in patients was 74. 2%, specificity was 68. 8%, and area under ROC was 0. 730, (95%CI: 0. 635 to 0. 825, P<0. 05); when the critical value of CRUSADE bleeding score was 30, its predictive sensitivity for bleeding events was 77. 4%, specificity was 55. 2%, and area under ROC was 0. 689 (95%CI: 0. 596 to 0. 781, P<0. 05); the predictive sensitivity of serum GDF-15 combined with HAS-BLED bleeding score for bleeding after PCI treatment in CAD patients was 74. 2%, specificity was 78. 9%, and area under ROC was 0. 794 (95%CI: 0. 711 to 0. 876); serum GDF-15 combined with CRUSADE bleeding score had a predictive sensitivity of 87. 1%, specificity of 61. 3%, and area under ROC of 0. 788, 95%CI of 0. 711 to 0. 865 for bleeding after PCI treatment in patients with CAD; significant difference was found in the bleeding between the GDF-15 and GDF-15 combined with HAS-BLED bleeding score (P<0. 05). Conclusion Serum GDF-15, HAS-BLED bleeding score, and CRUSADE bleeding score were all effective predictors of bleeding risk after PCI in patients with CAD. The combined predictive efficacy of the two indicators was higher than that of the single indicator. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF