Search

Introduction: Patients with triple-class refractory (TCR) multiple myeloma (MM) often need cytoreductive chemotherapy for rapid disease control. Bendamustine is an outpatient-administered, bifunctional alkylator and isatuximab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody with unique cytotoxicity characteristics. We hypothesized that isatuximab-bendamustine-prednisone would be well-tolerated regimen in TCR MM, and conducted single-center, phase Ib, investigator-initiated study. Patients/Methods: Patients had TCR MM and last daratumumab exposure ≥ 6 weeks. This study was conducted as a 3 + 3 design to establish the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Isatuximab 10 mg/kg IV was administered weekly (cycle 1), and every 2 weeks thereafter. Bendamustine was administered on days 1 and 2 at 3 dose levels (DL): 50, 75, and 100 mg/m2. Methylprednisolone was administered as 125 mg on day 1 and prednisone 60 mg days 2–4. Common definitions were used for DLTs, adverse events (CTCAE v 5.0), and disease response. Results: Fifteen patients were treated (3 DL1, 6 DL2, 6 DL3). Median age was 71, 53% had high-risk cytogenetics, and 34% had prior BCMA-targeting therapy. One DLT was observed at DL2 (Grade 3 thrombocytopenia plus bleeding). There were no Grade 5 treatment-related AEs. The MTD was not reached. The overall response rate was 20% (3/15) including one stringent complete response. The median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI 0.9–4.1 months). Conclusion: We demonstrated the safety and tolerability of isatuximab-bendamustine-prednisone. Toxicities were mild and manageable with limited intervention. The study was discontinued due to slow accrual. However, we observed responses even among highly refractory patients. Clinical trial registration: This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04083898 on 9/6/2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The roles of Lenalidomide (Len) and Daratumumab (Dara) in multiple myeloma treatment are well-established, yet their influences on hematopoietic stem cell harvesting and reconstitution remain disputed. Methods: We conducted a systematic database review to identify cohort studies or RCTs evaluating the effect of the use of Len or Dara on hematopoietic stem cell collection and peripheral blood count recovery in multiple myeloma patients. Effects on hematopoietic collection or reconstitution were estimated by comparing standardized mean differences (SMD) and mean differences (MD), or median differences. Results: Eighteen relevant studies were identified, summarizing mobilization results. For Len, data from 13 studies were summarized, including total CD34+ cell yield, collection failure rate, and time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment. Results indicated that Len exposure led to decreased stem cell collection [SMD=-0.23, 95% CI (-0.34, -0.12)]. However, collection failure (<2×106) could be mitigated by plerixafor [OR=2.14, 95% CI (0.96, 4.77)]. For Dara, two RCTs and three cohort studies were included, showing that Dara exposure resulted in a reduction in total stem cells even with optimized plerixafor mobilization [SMD=-0.75, 95% CI (-1.26, -0.23)], and delayed platelet engraftment recovery [MD=1.20, 95% CI (0.73, 1.66)]. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis offers a comprehensive view of Len and Dara's impacts on hematopoietic stem cell collection and reconstitution in multiple myeloma. Len usage could lead to reduced stem cell collection, counteracted by plerixafor mobilization. Dara usage could result in diminished stem cell collection and delayed platelet engraftment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study is to analyze the profile of patients receiving daratumumab and their presentation to the transfusion laboratory by looking at the different pre-transfusion policies and the risk of erythrocyte alloimmunization. Patients receiving daratumumab from 2018 to 2023 were reviewed. They were divided into two groups: Group I, presented before administration of daratumumab, and Group II, presented after drug administration. Appropriate strategies were applied to mitigate the drug interference, and the transfusion outcome was analyzed by following up with the patients for six months. A total of 48 patients were studied. The antibody screen was negative in patients who presented before the administration of daratumumab (n = 35). Extended phenotyping was done for 31 patients. Blood group genotyping was done for 4 patients. The patients who presented after daratumumab administration (n = 13) had a positive antibody screen that became negative with dithiothreitol-treated cells. A total of 261 red cell units were transfused to these patients (mean 5.55 units per patient). None of the patients developed antibodies during the follow-up period. The transfusion services must frame policies and protocols to mitigate drug interference. Good communication between transfusion services and clinical hematologists is a must to ensure safe transfusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

TEMPI syndrome is a rare, acquired disorder with multisystemic manifestations. It is classified as a plasma cell disorder and is characterized by telangiectasias, erythrocytosis, monoclonal gammopathy, perinephric fluid collections and intrapulmonary shunt. Even though TEMPI's pathophysiology remains elusive, it responds to anti-myeloma therapy indicating that the monoclonal protein or clone plays a key role. We present a challenging case of a 73-year-old man with erythrocytosis and deteriorating renal function with nephrotic-range proteinuria in whom after extensive work up, the diagnosis of TEMPI syndrome was made. He was received treatment with daratumumab-bortezomib-cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (Dara-VCD) and achieved a hematological and clinical response. We also report preliminary data on a multiplex assay for cytokines and growth factors for two patients with TEMPI syndrome and note lower levels for non-specific innate immunity related cytokines. A direct link between renal impairment and TEMPI syndrome is not currently established; cytokine deregulation could potentially be involved in the ischemic changes observed in the renal biopsy of our patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prognosis of patients diagnosed with relapsed or refractory (R/R) T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (T-ALL/LBL) has consistently been unsatisfactory, with limited treatment options. As reports, the CAG regimen can serve as a salvage treatment for R/R T-ALL/LBL, but there remains a subset of patients who do not benefit from it. Recent studies have indicated that daratumumab (Dara) and venetoclax (Ven) may offer promising therapeutic benefits for T-ALL/LBL. In light of these findings, we conducted a safety and efficacy evaluation of the enhanced treatment regimen, combining Dara and Ven with aclarubicin, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and etoposide (CAGE), in patients suffering from R/R T-ALL/LBL. The participants in this phase I trial were patients with R/R T-ALL/LBL who fail to standard treatment regimens. During each 28-day cycle, the patients were treated by Dara, Ven, cytarabine, aclarubicin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, etoposide. The primary endpoint of this study was the rate of remission. This report presents the prospective outcomes of 21 patients who received the salvage therapy of Dara and Ven combined with the CAGE regimen (Dara + Ven + CAGE). The objective remission rate (ORR) was determined to be 57.1%, while the complete remission (CR) rate was 47.6%. Notably, patients with the early T-cell precursor (ETP) subtype exhibited a significantly higher remission rate in the bone marrow compared to non-ETP patients (100% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.044). The Dara + Ven + CAGE regimen demonstrated a favorable remission rate in patients with R/R T-ALL/LBL. Moreover, the treatment was well-tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The randomized, phase 2 GRIFFIN study (NCT02874742) evaluated daratumumab plus lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-RVd) in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We present final post hoc analyses (median follow-up, 49.6 months) of clinically relevant subgroups, including patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) per revised definition (del[17p], t[4;14], t[14;16], t[14;20], and/or gain/amp[1q21]). Patients received 4 induction cycles (D-RVd/RVd), high-dose therapy/transplant, 2 consolidation cycles (D-RVd/RVd), and lenalidomide±daratumumab maintenance (≤ 2 years). Minimal residual disease–negativity (10−5) rates were higher for D-RVd versus RVd in patients ≥ 65 years (67.9% vs 17.9%), with HRCAs (54.8% vs 32.4%), and with gain/amp(1q21) (61.8% vs 28.6%). D-RVd showed a trend toward improved progression-free survival versus RVd (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) in patients ≥ 65 years (0.29 [0.06–1.48]), with HRCAs (0.38 [0.14–1.01]), and with gain/amp(1q21) (0.42 [0.14–1.27]). In the functional high-risk subgroup (not MRD negative at the end of consolidation), the hazard ratio was 0.82 (0.35–1.89). Among patients ≥ 65 years, grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates were higher for D-RVd versus RVd (88.9% vs 77.8%), as were TEAEs leading to discontinuation of ≥ 1 treatment component (37.0% vs 25.9%). One D-RVd patient died due to an unrelated TEAE. These results support the addition of daratumumab to RVd in transplant-eligible patients with high-risk NDMM. Video Abstract -YjyZJrsb3fs1sAVfK2kfK [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The introduction of daratumumab has improved treatment outcomes for multiple myeloma (MM). However, infectious complications are a concern in patients receiving daratumumab. Although some reports have explored the association between daratumumab and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, most of these have focused on relapsed or refractory cases, and few describe patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). In this study, we retrospectively analyzed CMV infections in 53 patients with NDMM who received daratumumab as induction therapy. CMV infection was defined as CMV antigenemia positivity. The median age at treatment initiation was 71 years (range, 50–82 years), and 50.9% of the patients were female. The median duration of daratumumab administration was 10.0 months (range, 0.3–63.8 months). Nine patients developed CMV infection, and the cumulative incidence rate at six months was 18.1% (95% confidence interval: 8.9–30.1%). One patient experienced CMV retinitis and required antiviral therapy, while the remaining eight patients did not require treatment and could be managed through observation. Few cases of CMV infection during daratumumab treatment for NDMM required treatment. However, the incidence of CMV infection was not negligible, suggesting that regular monitoring for CMV is worth considering to ensure more appropriate management during daratumumab treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Gain and amplification of 1q21 (1q21+) are adverse chromosomal aberrations of multiple myeloma (MM) that lead to refractoriness to a variety of therapies. While it is known that daratumumab, an anti-cancer monoclonal antibody, cannot overcome the disadvantage of 1q21+in relapsed/refractory MM patients, its benefit in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients with 1q21+has not been clarified. Patients: We retrospectively evaluated 11 (55%) 1q21+patients (3 copies: 6, > 4 copies: 5) among 20 NDMM patients (median age, 74 years) who received daratumumab-containing regimens at Shibukawa Medical Center from October 2019 to October 2022. Results: The overall response rate was 82% for patients with 1q21+and 78% for patients without 1q21+. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were not reached in either group. Neither 1q21 copy number nor co-existence of other high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities significantly affected PFS or OS. Conclusion: Our preliminary data suggests that outcomes of daratumumab treatment in NDMM 1q21+patients might be non-inferior to those in non-1q21+patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Natural killer/T cell lymphoma (NKTCL) is a highly aggressive, heterogeneous non-Hodgkin lymphoma resulting from malignant proliferation of cytotoxic natural killer (NK) or T cells. Previous studies demonstrated variable expression of CD38 on NKTCL tumors. Daratumumab, a human IgGκ monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 with a direct on-tumor and immunomodulatory mechanism of action, was hypothesized to be a novel therapeutic option for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) NKTCL. In the phase 2 NKT2001 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02927925) assessing the safety and efficacy of daratumumab, a suboptimal overall response rate was seen in R/R NKTCL patients. One patient, whose tumors did not express CD38, responded to treatment, suggesting that the immunomodulatory activities of daratumumab may be sufficient to confer clinical benefit. To understand the suboptimal response rate and short duration of response, we investigated the immune profile of NKTCL patients from NKT2001 in the context of daratumumab anti-tumor activity. Tumor tissue and whole blood were, respectively, analyzed for CD38 expression and patient immune landscapes, which were assessed via cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF), multiparameter flow cytometry (MPFC), clonal sequencing, and plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-DNA level measurements. Changes observed in the immune profiles of NKTCL patients from NKT2001, including differences in B and T cell populations between responders and nonresponders, suggest that modulation of the immune environment is crucial for daratumumab anti-tumor activities in NKTCL. In conclusion, these findings highlight that the clinical benefit of daratumumab in NKTCL may be enriched by B/T cell–related biomarkers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of 24 cycles of Dara in combination with carfilzomib (K), lenalidomide (R), and dexamethasone (d) without autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) irrespective of ASCT eligibility in a single-arm, phase II study. The primary endpoint was the rate of stringent complete response (sCR) and/or measurable residual disease (MRD) < 10−5 by next-generation sequencing (NGS) at the end of cycle 8 (C8). MRD was also assessed on peripheral blood samples using both the EXENT® system and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS). Forty-two patients entered the treatment phase; forty were evaluable for the primary endpoint. The rate of sCR and/or MRD < 10−5 following C8 was 30/40 (75%), meeting the statistical threshold for efficacy. The 10−6 MRD negative rate improved with treatment beyond C8. Agreement between EXENT® and NGS was high and increased over time; agreement between LC-MS and NGS was lower. The estimated 3-year progression-free survival progression-free survival was 85%, and 3-year overall survival was 95%. Upper respiratory infections occurred in 67% (7% grade 3–4). There were no treatment-related deaths. Extended frontline Dara-KRd induced a high rate of sCR and/or MRD negativity; the rate and depth of MRD negativity improved beyond C8. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) and bortezomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) are commonly used treatment combinations for transplant-ineligible (TIE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). D-Rd and VRd demonstrated superior efficacy relative to lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in the MAIA and SWOG S0777 trials, respectively, but have not been compared directly in a head-to-head trial. Naïve comparisons of efficacy across the two trials may be biased because MAIA enrolled only TIE patients (median age 73 years), whereas SWOG S0777 enrolled both TIE patients and transplant-eligible patients who chose to defer/refuse frontline stem cell transplantation (median age 63 years). The present study compared progression-free survival (PFS) in TIE patients with NDMM treated with D-Rd versus VRd based on an adjusted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) that leveraged individual patient-level data from MAIA and SWOG S0777. Methods: Harmonized inclusion/exclusion criteria (including age ≥ 65 years as a proxy for transplant ineligibility) and propensity-score weighting were used to balance the trial populations on measured baseline characteristics. After differences in trial populations were adjusted for, an anchored ITC was performed wherein within-trial PFS hazard ratios (HRs) for D-Rd versus Rd and VRd versus Rd were estimated and used to make indirect inference about PFS for D-Rd versus VRd. Results: PFS HRs were 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–0.67) for D-Rd versus Rd based on MAIA data, 0.88 (95% CI 0.63–1.23) for VRd versus Rd based on SWOG S0777 data, and 0.59 (95% CI 0.39–0.90) for the Rd-anchored ITC of D-Rd versus VRd. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses produced results consistent with the primary results. Conclusion: This anchored ITC demonstrated a greater PFS benefit for D-Rd versus VRd in TIE patients with NDMM. In the absence of head-to-head trials comparing D-Rd and VRd, the present trial may help inform treatment selection in this patient population. Plain Language Summary: Multiple drug combinations can be used to treat patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are not eligible for a stem cell transplant. Two of these combinations—daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) and bortezomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd)—have each been studied in clinical trials (MAIA and SWOG S0777) against the combination of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rd), but D-Rd and VRd have not been compared directly in a head-to-head clinical trial. Our study used data from the MAIA and SWOG S0777 trials to indirectly compare outcomes observed with D-Rd and VRd. For this indirect comparison between D-Rd and VRd, we first made adjustments to the patient populations of each trial to make them more similar to each other; this helped to make sure any differences we saw in treatment outcomes between D-Rd and VRd would not be because of differences in the characteristics of the patients who participated in the trials. After we made these adjustments to the patient populations of each trial, both D-Rd and VRd lowered the risk of disease progression or death compared with Rd alone. However, when indirectly compared in our study, D-Rd lowered the risk of disease progression or death by 41% compared with VRd. As data directly comparing treatment outcomes for D-Rd and VRd are not available, this indirect comparison can contribute to the information used to make treatment decisions for patients with NDMM who are not eligible for a stem cell transplant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is no specific treatment for proliferative glomerulonephritis with monoclonal IgG deposits (PGNMID), a disease that is very rare in the pediatric population. We report the case of a 15-year-old boy who presented with mildly reduced kidney function and nephrotic syndrome. Kidney biopsy revealed PGNMID with monoclonal deposits of IgG3 with kappa light chain restriction. Flow cytometry showed a significant CD38 plasma cell population in the peripheral blood in the absence of other signs of hematological malignancy. The patient was treated with a 6-month course of daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38. There was a significant reduction in proteinuria and normalization of kidney function. Based on positive experience with adults, daratumumab should also be studied in children with PGNMID. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antibodies directed against donor-specific HLA loci (DSA) has been proved as a main culprit for graft rejection, more specifically in HLA mismatched and haplo-identical transplant settings. There is no standardized regimen to manage the presence of DSAs in allogeneic stem cell transplantations (allo-SCTs). Most widely regimen includes combination of rituximab (anti CD20 antibody), Immunoglobulin (IVIG), plasma exchange, and buffy coat infusion, which is costly and time-consuming. Daratumumab (anti CD38 monoclonal antibody) is an effective therapeutic agent to deplete plasma cells and hence, it has a potential to reduce DSA. It has been utilized widely in solid organ transplantation for this purpose. We used this agent in two haplo-identical transplant patients to eliminate or reduce DSA. We observed definite either reduction or elimination in DSA levels in these cases and we could perform haplo-identical transplantation without much delay and with successful primary engraftment in both scenarios. We emphasize that literature on real-world utilization of daratumumab in allo-SCTs is limited. However, it has been utilized widely in solid organ transplantation for this purpose. Our experience with daratumumab regarding effective reduction of DSA followed by successful engraftment might encourage its use in de-sensitization protocols without much delay in transplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies like Daratumumab (Dara) are effective in multiple myeloma (MM); however, drug resistance ultimately occurs and the mechanisms behind this are poorly understood. Here, we identify, via two in vitro genome-wide CRISPR screens probing Daratumumab resistance, KDM6A as an important regulator of sensitivity to Daratumumab-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Loss of KDM6A leads to increased levels of H3K27me3 on the promoter of CD38, resulting in a marked downregulation in CD38 expression, which may cause resistance to Daratumumab-mediated ADCC. Re-introducing CD38 does not reverse Daratumumab-mediated ADCC fully, which suggests that additional KDM6A targets, including CD48 which is also downregulated upon KDM6A loss, contribute to Daratumumab-mediated ADCC. Inhibition of H3K27me3 with an EZH2 inhibitor resulted in CD38 and CD48 upregulation and restored sensitivity to Daratumumab. These findings suggest KDM6A loss as a mechanism of Daratumumab resistance and lay down the proof of principle for the therapeutic application of EZH2 inhibitors, one of which is already FDA-approved, in improving MM responsiveness to Daratumumab. The anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody Daratumumab is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma but efficiency is curtailed by secondary resistance. Here authors show that the antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, which is the main mechanism of action for Daratumumab, is regulated by KDM6A via Histone H3 K27 methylation of CD38 and CD48, downregulation of which leads to drug resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the efficacy and immune modulation associated with the addition of immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs) to the drug daratumumab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The study evaluated the combination of daratumumab and an IMiD in 37 patients who were refractory to both proteasome inhibitors and IMiDs. The results showed that the addition of an IMiD to the daratumumab backbone resulted in respectable response rates and progression-free survival in triple refractory patients. The study also highlighted the immune modulation caused by daratumumab and suggested that the immune microenvironment may play a role in the synergistic effect of the combination therapy. [Extracted from the article]

A study conducted by researchers at the Mayo Clinic found that the combination of daratumumab and an IMiD (immunomodulatory drug) resulted in a longer progression-free survival (PFS) compared to the combination of daratumumab and a PI (proteasome inhibitor) in patients with multiple myeloma. The study also showed that the lenalidomide-based combination had a better PFS than the pomalidomide-based combination, except for patients who were already refractory to IMiDs from first-line treatment. The findings suggest that the daratumumab-IMiD combination may be more effective as a second-line therapy for multiple myeloma patients. However, the study has limitations and further research is needed to confirm these results. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Daratumumab and isatuximab are anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies indicated for the treatment of multiple myeloma. These agents can increase the risk of infectious complications, including viral infections. Cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation have been reported in the literature in patients receiving anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody-based therapies. Aim: The objective of this analysis was to determine if the association between anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody exposure and the development of hepatitis B reactivation had a detectable reporting signal in the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Method: We conducted a post marketing pharmacovigilance analysis by querying the FAERS for reports of HBV reactivation with daratumumab or isatuximab exposure reported between 2015 and 2022. Disproportionality signal analysis was conducted by calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs). Results: Sixteen cases of hepatitis B virus reactivation were reported in the FAERS database among patients receiving daratumumab or isatuximab reported between 2015 and 2022. The ROR for HBV reactivation was statistically significant for both daratumumab (ROR 4.76, 95% CI 2.76–8.22) and isatuximab (ROR 9.31, 95% CI 3.00–28.92). Conclusion: Overall, our analysis demonstrates a significant reporting signal for HBV reactivation with daratumumab and isatuximab. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The intravenous administration (IV) of daratumumab sometimes causes an infusion reaction and needs a long infusion time. Recently, a subcutaneous formulation (SC) of daratumumab, which has fewer infusion reactions and shorter administration time, was approved. However, because SC has a fixed dose, overdosing is a concern for patients with low body weights. In this study, we investigated the safety and blood levels of daratumumab after switching from IV to SC in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Patients who switched from IV to SC of daratumumab between June 2021 and May 2022 at Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital were included in the study. Blood daratumumab levels were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Safety after switching from IV to SC was evaluated for six months and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. The median body weight of ten patients included in the analysis was 57.4 kg (range: 45.0–74.4). Blood daratumumab levels were significantly increased after switching to SC (p = 0.002); median through concentration at the last IV dose was 403.6 μg/mL (range: 96.3–776.3) and that at the third SC dose was 557.1 μg/mL (range: 288.3–997.2). Grade 1–2 injection site reactions were observed in six patients (60.0%) after switching to SC. A new grade 3 adverse event was observed in only one patient (neutropenia). The blood levels of daratumumab were significantly increased after switching from IV to SC in patients with MM; however, the dosage was tolerable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The correction notice in the Annals of Hematology addresses the article comparing treatment options for transplant-ineligible Asian patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The authors opted for Open Choice, making the article an Open Access publication under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The correction ensures proper credit to the authors and allows for sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction of the article. [Extracted from the article]

Purpose: Outcomes of multiple myeloma (MM) patients who are refractory to daratumumab are dismal and no standard of treatment exists for this patients' population. Here, we investigate the role of pomalidomide combinations in daratumumab-refractory MM patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of myeloma patients treated at four referral centers (three in Germany and one in Italy). Review chart identified 30 patients with relapsed and refractory myeloma, who progressed during treatment with daratumumab and were treated with pomalidomide-based combinations in the subsequent lines of therapy. Results: Responses improved from 37% with daratumumab to 53% with pomalidomide. Of seven patients with extramedullary MM (EMM), four achieved a clinical stabilization with pomalidomide, including one patient with a long-lasting complete response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6 and 12 months, respectively. Pomalidomide combinations were well tolerated, no patient discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Conclusion: These data show that pomalidomide-based combinations can be an effective and safe salvage regimen for daratumumab-refractory patients, including those with EMM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Isatuximab and daratumumab are anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies used to treat refractory multiple myeloma. Isatuximab is often used after unsuccessful daratumumab treatment; however, the clinical benefits of receiving isatuximab after daratumumab treatment have not been fully evaluated. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study assessed the clinical outcomes of 39 patients with multiple myeloma who were administered isatuximab after daratumumab. The median follow-up period was 8.7 months (range 0.1–25.0 months). The overall response rate was 46.2% (18 patients). The 1-year overall survival was 53.9%, with a median progression-free survival of 5.6 months. The median progression-free survival in patients with high and normal lactate dehydrogenase levels was 4.5 and 9.6 months, respectively (P = 0.004). The median progression-free survival in patients with and without triple-class refractory disease was 5.1 months and not reached, respectively (P = 0.001). The median overall survival in patients with high and normal lactate dehydrogenase levels was not reached and 9.3 months, respectively (P = 0.001). The median overall survival in patients with and without triple-class refractory disease was 9.9 months and not reached, respectively (P = 0.038). Our findings provide insight into the optimal use and timing of anti-CD38 antibody therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We performed real world evidence (RWE) analysis of daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Dara-Rd) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) treatment in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients (RRMM). In total, 240 RRMM patients were treated with Dara-Rd from 2016 to 2022 outside of clinical trials in all major Czech hematology centers. As a reference, 531 RRMM patients treated with Rd were evaluated. Patients' data were recorded in the Czech Registry of Monoclonal Gammopathies (RMG). Partial response (PR) or better response (ORR) was achieved in significantly more patients in Dara-Rd than in Rd group (91.2% vs. 69.9%; p < 0.001). The median progression free survival (PFS) was 26.9 months in the Dara-Rd and 12.8 months in the Rd group (p < 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in the Dara-Rd compared to 27.2 months in the Rd group (p = 0.023). In patients with 1–3 previous treatment lines, there was significant PFS benefit of Dara-Rd compared to Rd (median PFS not reached vs. 13.2 months; p < 0.001). In patients with > 3 previous treatment lines, there was no significant PFS benefit of Dara-Rd treatment (7.8 months vs. 9.9 months; p = 0.874), similarly in patients refractory to PI + IMIDs (11.5 months vs. 9.2 months; p = 0.376). In RWE conditions, the median PFS in RRMM patients treated with Dara-Rd is shorter when compared to clinical trials. In heavily pretreated RRMM patients, efficacy of Dara-Rd treatment is limited; best possible outcomes of Dara-Rd are achieved in minimally pretreated patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Daratumumab is a fully human, monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 and a first-in-class CD38-targeting drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma or newly diagnosed light-chain amyloidosis. CD38 is heavily expressed on malignant myeloma cells, and daratumumab exerts anti-myeloma activity via immune-mediated mechanisms, direct induction of apoptosis, and immunomodulation. Daratumumab is used as monotherapy or in combination with standard-of-care myeloma therapies, including proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, DNA-alkylating agents, and corticosteroids. Following an intravenous infusion, daratumumab exhibits nonlinear pharmacokinetics (PK), as clearance decreases with higher doses and over time because of target-mediated effects. Dosing schedules vary depending on indications and co-administered drugs, but generally daratumumab is administered weekly for 6–9 weeks followed by a less frequent dosing regimen, once every 2–4 weeks. Daratumumab exposure is strongly correlated with efficacy, and the exposure–efficacy relationship follows a maximal effect model, whereas exposure is not correlated with safety endpoints. The approved dose of 16 mg/kg of daratumumab results in the saturation of 99% of the target at the end of weekly dosing in most patients, and high target saturation is maintained over time during the less frequent dosing schedule. Infusion-related reactions are frequently observed in patients given daratumumab, particularly with the first infusion, thus prompting long durations of infusion (~ 7 h) and splitting of the first dose across 2 days. This led to the development of a subcutaneous delivery formulation for daratumumab (Dara-SC). Dara-SC provides a similar efficacy and safety profile to intravenous daratumumab (Dara-IV) but has a much lower rate of infusion-related reactions and a shorter infusion time. Exposure–response relationships for efficacy and safety endpoints were similar between Dara-SC and Dara-IV, and co-administered drugs with either Dara-IV or Dara-SC do not significantly affect daratumumab PK. Except for baseline myeloma type and albumin level, none of the other investigated disease and patient characteristics (renal/hepatic function, age, sex, race, weight, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status) was identified to have clinically relevant effects on exposure to daratumumab monotherapy or combination therapy regimens. Dara-IV exposure was significantly lower in patients with immunoglobulin G myeloma compared with patients with non-immunoglobulin G myeloma (p < 0.0001) and in patients with a lower albumin level, whereas the overall response rate was similar regardless of the myeloma type and albumin level. Daratumumab dose adjustment is not currently recommended based on disease and patient characteristics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Of the 3 daratumumab-triplet/quadruplet regimens without response, 2 were administered to the refractory patient who died; the third occurred in a patient who had responded to DVCd but was transitioned to DPVd to avoid long-term alkylator use; no further response was seen, but patient remained on regimen for 16 months. POEMS (Polyneuropathy, Organomegaly, Endocrinopathies, Monoclonal protein, Skin changes) syndrome is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome related to plasma cell disorders. Of the 6 patients treated with carfilzomib-based therapies, 5 patients (83%) responded to therapy: 3 patients achieved CR/VGPR SB H sb , 1 achieved PR SB H sb , and 1 achieved a clinical response (Fig. Four of the seven pomalidomide-treated patients responded; notably, the one patient receiving a doublet did not respond, but 3 of the 4 DPd patients did respond as did the one KPd-treated patient. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy of plasma cells with characteristic bone disease. Despite recent great strides achieved in MM treatment owing to the implementation of new anti-MM agents, MM is still incurable and bone destruction remains a serious unmet issue in patients with MM. Approach: In this review, we will summarize and discuss the mechanisms of the formation of bone disease in MM and the available preclinical and clinical evidence on the treatment for MM bone disease. Conclusions: MM cells produce a variety of cytokines to stimulate receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand-mediated osteoclastogenesis and suppress osteoblastic differentiation from bone marrow stromal cells, leading to extensive bone destruction with rapid loss of bone. MM cells alter the microenvironment through bone destruction where they colonize, which in turn favors tumor growth and survival, thereby forming a vicious cycle between tumor progression and bone destruction. Denosumab or zoledronic acid is currently recommended to be administered at the start of treatment in newly diagnosed patients with MM with bone disease. Proteasome inhibitors and the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab have been demonstrated to exert bone-modifying activity in responders. Besides their anti-tumor activity, the effects of new anti-MM agents on bone metabolism should be more precisely analyzed in patients with MM. Because prognosis in patients with MM has been significantly improved owing to the implementation of new agents, the therapeutic impact of bone-modifying agents should be re-estimated in the era of these new agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The development of new treatment agents in recent decades has significantly improved the survival of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Nonetheless, MM remains an incurable disease; therefore, novel combination therapies are required. Natural killer (NK) cells are one of the safest immunotherapeutic options. In this study, we found that the anti-myeloma activity of expanded NK cells (eNKs) was improved by daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (DRd) in an MM xenograft mouse model. NK cells expanded from peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected from MM patients were highly cytotoxic against DRd pretreated tumor cells in vitro. To mimic the clinical protocol, a human MM xenograft model was developed using human RPMI8226-RFP-FLuc cells in NOD/SCID IL-2Rγnull (NSG) mice. MM bearing mice were randomly divided into six groups: no treatment, eNK, Rd, Rd + eNKs, DRd, and DRd + eNKs. DRd significantly enhanced the cytotoxicity of eNKs by upregulating NK cell activation ligands and effector function. DRd in combination with eNKs significantly reduced the serum M-protein level and prolonged mouse survival. In addition, DRd significantly increased the persistence of eNK and homing to MM sites. These results show that the anti-myeloma activity of ex vivo-expanded and activated NK cells is augmented by the immunomodulatory effect of DRd in MM-bearing mice, suggesting the therapeutic potential of this combination for MM patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard treatment for symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM) in patients under 65 years of age. However, the performing of ASCT in older patients > 65 years without comorbidities or complications is controversial. Introduction of novel drugs, such as daratumumab, has improved the long-term survival of patients with MM who are ineligible for ASCT. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of ASCT in older patients, even in the era of novel drugs. A total of 55 patients aged 65–74 years (15 ASCT recipients and 40 ASCT-ineligible patients) newly diagnosed with MM between March 2013 and October 2021 at our institution were analyzed in this study. There were no significant differences in the 3-year overall survival (84.6% vs. 90.6%, p = 0.72) and progression-free survival (PFS) (61.2% vs. 75.1%, p = 0.40) between ASCT recipients and ASCT-ineligible patients. There was also no significant difference in complete response (CR) with minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative rate between the two groups (27% vs. 33%, p = 1.0). Multivariate analysis showed that CR was an independent predictor of PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.08–0.76; p = 0.01). In this retrospective study, despite patients who were determined to be intolerant to ASCT, the non-ASCT group was non-inferior to the ASCT group in PFS and overall response rate. The results of this study confirm that the significance of ASCT is diminishing in patients 65 years of age and older because newer agents can achieve good responses without ASCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: We aimed to quantify the daratumumab concentration- and CD38 dynamics-dependent pharmacokinetics using a pharmacodynamic mediated disposition model (PDMDD) in patients with multiple myeloma (MMY) following daratumumab IV or SC monotherapy. Daratumumab, a human IgG monoclonal antibody targeting CD38 with a direct on-tumor and immunomodulatory mechanism of action, has been approved to treat patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Methods: In total, 7788 daratumumab plasma samples from 850 patients with diagnosis of MMY were used. The serum concentration-time data of daratumumab were analysed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling with NONMEM®. The PDMDD with quasi steady-state approximation (QSS) was compared to the previously developed Michaelis-Menten (MM) approximation with respect to the parameter estimates, the goodness-of-fit plots and prediction-corrected visual predictive check, as well as model-based simulations. The effect of patients' covariates on daratumumab pharmacokinetics was also investigated. Results: The QSS approximation characterized the concentration- and CD38 dynamics-dependency of daratumumab pharmacokinetics within the doses ranging from 0.1 to 24 mg/kg after IV administration and 1200 and 1800 mg after SC administration in patients with MMY, mechanistically describing the binding of daratumumab and CD38, the internalization of the daratumumab-CD38 complex and the CD38 turnover. Compared to the previously developed MM approximation, the MM approximation with the non-constant total target and dose-correction provided substantial improvement of the model fit, but it was still not as good as the QSS approximation. The effect of the previously identified covariates as well as the newly identified covariate (baseline M protein) on daratumumab pharmacokinetics was confirmed, but the magnitude of the effect was deemed not clinically relevant. Conclusions: Accounting for the CD38 turnover and its binding capacity to daratumumab, the QSS approximation provided a mechanistic interpretation of daratumumab PK parameters and consequently well described the concentration- and CD38 dynamics-dependency of daratumumab pharmacokinetics. Clinical studies included in the analysis were registered with the NCT number below at http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov MMY1002 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02116569), MMY1003 (NCT02852837), MMY1004 (NCT02519452), MMY1008 (NCT03242889), GEN501 (NCT00574288), MMY2002 (NCT01985126), MMY3012 (NCT03277105). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Subcutaneous daratumumab plus bortezomib/cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone (VCd; D-VCd) improved outcomes versus VCd for patients with newly diagnosed immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis in the phase 3 ANDROMEDA study. We report a subgroup analysis of Asian patients (Japan; Korea; China) from ANDROMEDA. Among 388 randomized patients, 60 were Asian (D-VCd, n = 29; VCd, n = 31). At a median follow-up of 11.4 months, the overall hematologic complete response rate was higher for D-VCd versus VCd (58.6% vs. 9.7%; odds ratio, 13.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3–53.7; P < 0.0001). Six-month cardiac and renal response rates were higher with D-VCd versus VCd (cardiac, 46.7% vs. 4.8%; P = 0.0036; renal, 57.1% vs. 37.5%; P = 0.4684). Major organ deterioration progression-free survival (MOD-PFS) and major organ deterioration event-free survival (MOD-EFS) were improved with D-VCd versus VCd (MOD-PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06–0.75; P = 0.0079; MOD-EFS: HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05–0.54; P = 0.0007). Twelve deaths occurred (D-VCd, n = 3; VCd, n = 9). Twenty-two patients had baseline serologies indicating prior hepatitis B virus (HBV) exposure; no patient experienced HBV reactivation. Although grade 3/4 cytopenia rates were higher than in the global safety population, the safety profile of D-VCd in Asian patients was generally consistent with the global study population, regardless of body weight. These results support D-VCd use in Asian patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03201965. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Novel therapeutic drugs have dramatically improved the overall survival of patients with multiple myeloma. We sought to identify the characteristics of patients likely to exhibit a durable response to one such drug, elotuzumab, by analyzing a real-world database in Japan. We analyzed 179 patients who underwent 201 elotuzumab treatments. The median time to next treatment (TTNT) with the 95% confidence interval was 6.29 months (5.18–9.20) in this cohort. Univariate analysis showed that patients with any of the following had longer TTNT: no high risk cytogenic abnormalities, more white blood cells, more lymphocytes, non-deviated κ/λ ratio, lower β2 microglobulin levels (B2MG), fewer prior drug regimens, no prior daratumumab use and better response after elotuzumab treatment. A multivariate analysis showed that TTNT was longer in patients with more lymphocytes (≥ 1400/μL), non-deviated κ/λ ratio (0.1–10), lower B2MG (< 5.5 mg/L) and no prior daratumumab use. We proposed a simple scoring system to predict the durability of the elotuzumab treatment effect by classifying the patients into three categories based on their lymphocyte counts (0 points for ≥ 1400/μL and 1 point for < 1400/μL) and κ/λ ratio (0 points for 0.1–10 and 1 point for < 0.1 or ≥ 10) or B2MG (0 points for < 5.5 mg/L and 1 point for ≥ 5.5 mg/L). The patients with a score of 0 showed significantly longer TTNT (p < 0.001) and better survival (p < 0.001) compared to those with a score of 1 or 2. Prospective cohort studies of elotuzumab treatment may be needed to validate the usefulness of our new scoring system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Almost all patients with multiple myeloma (MM) will eventually develop disease that has relapsed with or become refractory to available treatments and will require additional therapy. However, data are still lacking on how best to sequence regimens in the relapsed/refractory (RR) setting after the failure of early-line lenalidomide, bortezomib, and/or daratumumab, the most commonly used agents in clinical practice today. With the treatment landscape rapidly changing in response to emerging clinical trial data and approvals of several new drugs and additional combinations, it is critically important to focus on patients with RRMM. Variability in patient baseline characteristics, such as the number of prior lines of treatment, refractoriness to prior treatments, prior stem cell transplant, and timing and dosing of prior lenalidomide, makes it difficult to select the best options for patients with RRMM for whom first-line treatments have failed. The aim of this review is to provide both an overview of current therapies and future directions within the RRMM treatment landscape, and a framework for clinicians to choose the most promising next treatment option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients in PLEIADES and EQUULEUS had received a median (range) of 1 (1-1) and 2 (1-4) prior lines of therapy, respectively, and 60 (90.9%) and 85 (100%) patients had received prior proteasome inhibitor therapy. EQUULEUS (NCT01998971) evaluated daratumumab IV plus weekly Kd (carfilzomib 70 mg/m SP 2 sp ; dexamethasone 40 mg) in RRMM patients after 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy (including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory drug). Patients in CANDOR received carfilzomib 56 mg/m SP 2 sp twice weekly (monthly cumulative dose, 336 mg/m SP 2 sp [Cycle 1, 264 mg/m SP 2 sp ]), while patients in PLEIADES and EQUULEUS received carfilzomib 70 mg/m SP 2 sp weekly (monthly cumulative dose, 210 mg/m SP 2 sp [Cycle 1, 160 mg/m SP 2 sp ]; ie, 62.5% of CANDOR monthly dose). [Extracted from the article]

Keywords: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; Mixed phenotype acute leukemia; Daratumumab; Venetoclax EN Acute lymphoblastic leukemia Mixed phenotype acute leukemia Daratumumab Venetoclax 669 672 4 03/03/23 20230301 NES 230301 Dear Editor: Here, we report on a twelve-year-old boy diagnosed with mixed phenotype acute leukemia (T cell ALL/acute myeloid leukemia, AML) bearing a I KMT2A::MLLT4 i fusion in June 2018. In the further course, the patient received low-dose cytarabine, two additional DLI doses, and mistletoe therapy. 1 Treatment course of a patient with with KMT2A:MLLT4-positive mixed phenotype acute leukemia (T cell ALL/AML). [Extracted from the article]

Daratumumab efficacy (4/20 patients remission and 2/20 MRD-negative remission) was noted in patients with relapsed refractory ALL [[8]]. Daratumumab - a novel treatment strategy in relapsed/refractory acute leukemia Novelty statement Anti-CD 38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab is effective in inducing short-lived MRD-negative remissions in refractory acute leukemias. [Extracted from the article]

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare and life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, severe thrombocytopenia, and organ ischemia associated with disseminated microvascular platelet-rich thrombus. Before the introduction of plasma therapy, acute TTP was almost universally fatal, which improved survival from < 10 to 80–90%. However, patients who survived an acute attack were at high risk for recurrence and long-term morbidity. It was reported that daratumumab can eradicate persistent ADAMTS13-inhibiting autoantibodies and restore ADAMTS13 activity in two patients with relapsed immune-mediated TTP without associated adverse drug reactions. Here we report a case series of patients with initial diagnosed acquired TTP treated with combination regimens containing daratumumab. All the patients achieved clinical response after the initial treatment. Three patients achieved clinical remission, one patient relapsed and one patient suffered an exacerbation during follow-up. The two patients were retreated with glucocorticoids, plasma exchange combined with daratumumab, and clinical remission was achieved again. Combination of daratumumab in the treatment of initial diagnosed acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura can rapidly restore ADAMST13 activity and turn negative for ADAMST13 inhibitors, resulting in long-term remission in patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Daratumumab and bortezomib, the first-line drugs for AL amyloidosis, typically yield a complete hematologic response (CHR) rate of nearly 60% when used in combinations. An early achievement of CHR is crucial in amyloidosis. We retrospectively evaluated the relationship between dFLC (the difference between free light chain) reduction by Day 7 in Cycle 1 (C1D7) and CHR, organ response, and survival in 48 newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients receiving daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone. The CHR rate within six months was 66.7%. Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve curve analysis, we predicted CHR based on a dFLC reduction in C1D7 (67.0% change, optimal sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 81.3%). We introduce the novel concept of “rapid hematologic dFLC response”, defined as a reduction in dFLC levels ≥ 67% in C1D7. The CHR rate in rapid responders’ groups was higher than that in slow responders’ group (90.3% vs. 23.5%, P<0.01). After a median follow-up of 19 months (range: 0.3–57), the renal response rate in rapid responders was higher than that in slow responders (72.0% vs. 27.5%, P = 0.025). The median major organ deterioration event-free survival in the rapid responders’ group (not reached) was significantly superior to that in the slow responders’ group (19 m, 95% CI: 1.79–23.14 m, P = 0.048). In conclusion, early dFLC reduction in C1D7 indicates a high possibility of CHR and organ response and may allow for early modification of therapy in selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Daratumumab is an effective therapy in multiple myeloma (MM). We assessed whether daratumumab retreatment may re-induce significant responses and which patients do benefit the most. We hypothesized, that there is effective synergism between daratumumab and alternating antimyeloma drug combinations during retreatment and that retreatment is safe and effective. Here, we analyzed 293 consecutive MM patients receiving daratumumab at our institution from 2016 until 2023 retrospectively, and compared responses, side effects and survival of the first daratumumab treatment line and its retreatment. We identified 22/293 (8%) patients with daratumumab retreatment. These patients showed an advanced age and ISS/R-ISS stages, and ≥ 3 lines of prior antimyeloma therapy in 91%. Of note, the median durations of the first and subsequent daratumumab treatment were similarly long. We confirmed a therapy break between daratumumab lines as advantageous. Daratumumab retreatment was effective, with responses declining only gradually from its first use to subsequent first and second retreatment with 64%, 46% and 43%, respectively. Interestingly, comparable progression free survival rates were observed with 11.5, 12 months and not reached, respectively. Consistently, adverse events per daratumumab line did not increase. Our findings suggest that well-selected daratumumab-exposed MM patients may show rewarding responses to daratumumab retreatment, the more with alternating antimyeloma combinations, initial good response and CD38-antibody-treatment pauses, thereby proving CD38-antibody-retreatment as feasible, effective and non-toxic. Confirmatory studies are required to further validate our results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The superiority and tolerability of daratumumab plus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (D-VMP) versus bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (VMP) in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) was previously described in the global phase 3 ALCYONE study. The primary analysis of the phase 3 OCTANS study further demonstrated the superiority and tolerability of D-VMP (n = 144) versus VMP (n = 71) in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with NDMM. The current analysis describes the final efficacy and safety outcomes for D-VMP versus VMP in OCTANS, with a follow-up of > 3 years. D-VMP demonstrated a benefit versus VMP with regard to the rate of very good partial response or better (80.1% vs. 47.3%), median progression-free survival (38.7 vs. 19.2 months), median time to next treatment (46.8 vs. 20.6 months), rate of complete response or better (46.6% vs. 18.9%), median duration of response (41.3 vs. 18.5 months), achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (40.4% vs. 10.8%), and sustained MRD negativity for ≥ 12 months (24.7% vs. 1.4%) and ≥ 18 months (15.1% vs. 1.4%). Median progression-free survival was longer among patients who achieved MRD negativity and sustained MRD negativity. The progression-free survival benefit observed with D-VMP was preserved across most clinically relevant subgroups, including patients with high-risk cytogenetics. No new safety concerns were identified with extended follow-up. This final analysis of OCTANS continues to demonstrate a clinical benefit for D-VMP versus VMP in transplant-ineligible Asian patients with NDMM, consistent with the global ALCYONE study, and supports the use of daratumumab combinations in this population. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03217812 submitted July 13, 2017. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Autoimmune encephalitis represents a potentially treatable immune-mediated condition that is being more frequently recognized. Prompt immunotherapy is a key factor for the management of autoimmune encephalitis. First-line treatments include intravenous steroids, plasma exchange, and intravenous immunoglobulins, which can be combined in most severe cases. Rituximab and cyclophosphamide are administered as second-line agents in unresponsive cases. A minority of patients may still remain refractory, thus representing a major clinical challenge. In these cases, treatment strategies are controversial, and no guidelines exist. Treatments proposed for refractory autoimmune encephalitis include (1) cytokine-based drugs (such as tocilizumab, interleukin-2/basiliximab, anakinra, and tofacitinib); (2) plasma cell-depleting agents (such as bortezomib and daratumumab); and (3) treatments targeting intrathecal immune cells or their trafficking through the blood-brain barrier (such as intrathecal methotrexate and natalizumab). The efficacy evidence of these drugs is mostly based on case reports or small case series, with few reported controlled studies or systematic reviews. The aim of the present review is to summarize the current evidence and related methodological issues in the use of these drugs for the treatment of refractory autoimmune encephalitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The phase 3 APOLLO study demonstrated significantly better progression-free survival (PFS) and clinical responses with daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-Pd) versus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). On the basis of these results and those from the phase 1b EQUULEUS trial, D-Pd was approved in this patient population. In the absence of head-to-head data comparing D-Pd with further standard of care (SOC) therapies, indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) can provide important information to help optimize treatment selection. The objective of this study was to indirectly compare PFS improvement with D-Pd versus daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (D-Vd) and D-Pd versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in patients with RRMM.Methods: Patient-level data were from APOLLO, EQUULEUS, and CASTOR. Three methods of adjusting imbalances in baseline characteristics including stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW), cardinality matching (CM), and propensity score matching (PSM) were initially considered. CM offers mathematically guaranteed largest matched sample meeting pre-specified maximum standardized mean difference criteria for matching covariates. sIPTW and PSM were based on propensity scores derived from logistic regression. Feasibility assessment of the PSM method returned too low effective sample size to support a meaningful comparison. CM was chosen as the base case and sIPTW as a sensitivity analysis.Results: After harmonized eligibility criteria were applied, 253, 104, and 122 patients from the D-Pd, D-Vd, and Vd cohorts, respectively, were included in the ITC analyses. Some imbalances in baseline characteristics were identified between D-Pd and D-Vd/Vd cohorts that remained after adjustment. PFS hazard ratios showed significant improvement for D-Pd over D-Vd and Vd for CM and sIPTW analyses.Conclusions: Results showed consistent PFS benefit for D-Pd versus D-Vd and Vd regardless of the adjustment technique used. These findings support the use of D-Pd versus D-Vd or Vd in patients with difficult-to-treat RRMM.Trial Registration: NCT03180736; NCT02136134, NCT01998971. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Daratumumab (DAR) is novel human anti-CD38 IgG1, high-affinity human monoclonal antibody having broad-spectrum killing activity. The antibody is recommended to treat multiple myeloma. Recently Antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) have been identified as the potential mechanism of DAR in addition to complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). In the present study we evaluated the effect of Daratumumab on other effector cells of multiple myeloma. Luciferase+ MM.1R GFP cells were selected for the study. For immune-compromised multiple myeloma tumour xenograft mouse model we used severe combined immunodeficient beige (SCID-beige), NOD SCID gamma (NSG) and C57Bl/6j mice. Bioluminescence imaging was carried by injecting luciferin, and in vivo confocal microscopy was done for tracing bone marrow niches. Spleen and tumours were submitted to immunophenotypic analysis. MTT assay was done for cell proliferation studies. We established tumour xenograft mouse model. It was found that DAR showed significant anti-tumour effect in tumour xenograft multiple myeloma mice. We found that DAR showed anti-tumour activity via Fc–FcγR interaction with macrophages. DAR induced phenotypic activation of macrophages in mice and resulted in ADCP of cancerous cells via interacting Fc-FcγR in vitro. The study suggested that DAR exerted anti-tumour activity in multiple myeloma by interacting with Fc-FcγR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In cohort C of the phase 2 MM-014 trial, the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, dexamethasone, and daratumumab therapy were investigated in 18 Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after their most recent regimen of lenalidomide-based therapy (NCT01946477). Patients received oral pomalidomide (4 mg daily), oral dexamethasone (20–40 mg weekly), and intravenously infused daratumumab (16 mg/kg). Median age was 67.5 years. All patients received prior lenalidomide per protocol; 89% received prior bortezomib. Twelve patients (67%) had lenalidomide-refractory disease, and 6 (33%) had lenalidomide-relapsed disease. Ten patients (56%) had only 1 prior treatment line. As of August 3, 2020, 15 patients (83%) were still on treatment; median follow-up was 8.1 months. Three patients (17%) discontinued treatment (2 for adverse events; 1 for major protocol deviation). Overall response rate (primary endpoint) was 83% (very good partial response or better, 61%). All patients had ≥ 1 grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events, most commonly neutropenia (78%; febrile, 6%), leukopenia (28%), and lymphopenia (22%). Grade 3/4 infections occurred in 17%; 11% had pneumonia. In Japanese patients with RRMM, a triplet regimen of pomalidomide, dexamethasone, and daratumumab after early-line lenalidomide treatment failure showed high efficacy and safety consistent with the known safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]