Search

BackgroundIn patients treated for advanced ovarian cancer not suitable for complete primary surgery, interval surgery after three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been considered standard management since the EORTC randomized trial published in 2010. An alternative approach with delayed surgery after six courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was reported in retrospective series.Primary ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy on progression free survival of interval cytoreduction surgery after three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with delayed surgery after six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Study HypothesisIn women with ovarian cancer not suitable for primary surgical cytoreduction, surgery after six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy will prove better disease-free survival than cytoreductive surgery after only three cycles.Trial DesignCHRONO is a multicenter, randomized phase III trial. After three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, eligible patients will be randomized (1:1) to either completion surgery followed by an additional five cycles of chemotherapy (control arm) or an additional three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by completion surgery and then two additional cycles of chemotherapy (experimental arm). Patients in both groups will receive eight total cycles of chemotherapy.Major Inclusion/Exclusion CriteriaThe main inclusion criteria are histologically confirmed epithelial high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer, documented FIGO stage IIIB–IVA unsuitable for complete primary surgery but considered resectable after three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The main exclusion criteria are mucinous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, or low-grade serous histologies.Primary EndpointThe primary endpoint is progression-free survival.Sample Size210 eligible patientsEstimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting ResultsThe estimated date for completing accrual will be Q2 2023. The estimated date for presentation of the first results is Q3 2028.Trial Registration NumberNCT03579394.

Background: The open-label, randomised Phase 2 AVATAXHER study (NCT01142778) demonstrated that early PET assessment identified HER2-positive breast cancer patients who responded poorly to neoadjuvant docetaxel plus trastuzumab. Adding neoadjuvant bevacizumab for PET-predicted poor-responders improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates (43.8% vs 24.0%). We investigated long-term study outcomes. Methods: Patients were treated in three groups. All patients initially received two cycles of standard neoadjuvant therapy with [¹⁸F]-FDG PET conducted before each cycle. Those with ≥70% change in the maximum standardised uptake value (∆SUVmax) received four further cycles of standard neoadjuvant therapy (PET responders). PET-predicted poor-responders (∆SUVmax

Background: The open-label, randomised Phase 2 AVATAXHER study demonstrated that early PET assessment identified patients with HER-2 positive breast cancer who responded poorly to standard neoadjuvant therapy (docetaxel plus trastuzumab). Adding bevacizumab to neoadjuvant therapy in PET-predicted poor-responders improved pathological complete response (pCR) rates (from 24·0% to 43·8%). We investigated whether the improved pCR rate translated into improved long-term outcomes. Methods: Patients were treated in three groups. All patients initially received two cycles of standard neoadjuvant therapy with [¹⁸F]-FDG PET conducted before each cycle. Those with a change in the maximum standardised uptake value (∆SUVmax) ≥70% received four further cycles of standard neoadjuvant therapy (PET responder group). PET-predicted poor-responders (∆SUVmax

6023 Background: Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT), is a rare and rapidly lethal disease affecting young women with over half dying within 2 years of diagnosis. We previously reported improved outcomes with cytoreductive surgery followed by HDC-aSCR in a prospective study, but these encouraging results needed to be confirmed in an independent and larger cohort. Methods: Between 2008 and 2019, out of 44 patients (pts) diagnosed with centrally confirmed SCCOHT in 16 referent centers of the TMRG network, 38 were treated prospectively according to the French recommendations of the network with complete surgery (primary or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy), 4 to 6 cycles of PAVEP chemotherapy (cisplatin, doxorubicin, vepeside, and cyclophosphamide), and for pts with complete response (CR), HDC-aSCR, followed by pelvic radiotherapy. The 6 patients who could not receive PAVEP (unfit or diagnostic delay) relapsed and died rapidly. The primary endpoint was the event-free survival (EFS) in the intention-to-treat cohort. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 33 years (14-76). 13 pts presented with FIGO stage I, 17 stage III and 6 stage IV, 2 unknown. Median follow-up was 55.5 months. 34 patients achieved CR with CT + surgery and 30 received HDC-aSCR (40%, 47% and 10% with stages I, III and IV diseases respectively) and 21 received also pelvic radiotherapy. Median overall and event-free survival was 36.4 and 15.9 months respectively, and 2-years event-free survival rate was 40% (CI95% 25-56). Median OS was respectively not reached, 18 and 9.6 months for FIGO I, III and IV patients. Among the pts (N = 14) who did not receive HDC-aSCR (rapid progression during or after PAVEP), the 2-yr EFS was 0% compared to 50.5% for the 30 patients receiving HDC. In multivariate analysis, HDC was significantly correlated with better outcomes (p < 0.001). For the 21 patients receiving also pelvic radiotherapy, 57% (12/21) are free of recurrence at 4 years. Grades 3/4 adverse events were frequent (78%) but, in most cases, manageable, although one toxic death (3%) occurred during HDC (fungal septic shock). Conclusions: Treatment of SCCOHT, with intensive multimodal therapy, is associated with a 40% 2-yr event-free survival. However, this protocol is associated with significant toxicity and should be restricted to good performance status patient and expert centers.

International audience; This paper presents a miniaturized microstrip back-cavity Hilbert Fractal Antenna specifically designed for breast cancer detection. This antenna is used to investigate on the possibility of detecting the presence of breast tumors by directly measuring the shift of the antenna resonance frequency. First, simulations are performed on a multi-layer breast model; then the proposed approach was applied for in vivo measurements on two different patients diagnosed with breast cancer, followed by ex vivo characterization of the electrical properties of excised tumors.

Background: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the combined use of The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram and Tenon score to select, in patients with metastatic sentinel lymph node (SN), those at low risk of metastatic non-SN for whom additional axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) could be avoided. Methods: From January 2011 to July 2012, a prospective non-interventional nationwide study was conducted (NCT01509963). We sought to identify the false reassurance rate (FRR, a negative test result is false) in patients with both a ⩽10% probability of metastatic non-SN with the MSKCC nomogram and a Tenon score ⩽3.5 (low risk): the proportion of patients with metastatic non-SN at additional ALND. Our hypothesis was that these patients would have a FRR⩽5%. Results: Data on 2822 patients with breast cancer from 53 institutions were prospectively recorded. At least one SN was metastatic (isolated tumour cells, micro- or macrometastases) in 696 patients (24.7%). Among patients with ALND and complete data to calculate combined risk (n=504), 67 and 437 patients had low and high combined risk, respectively. Patients at low risk had less ALND (47%) compared to patients at high risk (P

Summary Background An effective and well tolerated treatment is needed for patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer who do not achieve a pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. The AVATAXHER trial aimed to predict pathological complete response early with the use of PET and to investigate whether the addition of bevacizumab could improve the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response in patients unlikely to respond to treatment. Methods AVATAXHER was a randomised, open-label, non-comparative, multicentre phase 2 study that enrolled women (≥18 years of age) with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer from 26 oncology centres in France. Patients initially received two cycles of neoadjuvant docetaxel (100 mg/m 2 intravenously every 3 weeks) plus trastuzumab (8 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks then 6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks for the second course). Before the first and second cycles, [ 18 F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET was done and the change in standardised uptake value was used to predict pathological complete response in each patient. Patients who were predicted to be responders on PET continued to receive standard therapy. Predicted non-responders were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive four cycles of docetaxel (100 mg/m 2 intravenously every 3 weeks) and trastuzumab (6 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks; group A) or continue on docetaxel plus trastuzumab alone (group B). Randomisation was open label and was done by an adaptive minimisation method. Although investigators and patients were aware of group assignment, the anatomo-pathologist in charge of centralised review of surgical samples and lymph nodes was masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed pathological complete response according to the Chevallier classification. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses in this Article were done on all patients who received at least one dose of treatment starting from cycle 3. Survival outcomes are not yet mature. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01142778) and EUDRACT (2009-013410-26). Findings Between May 19, 2010, and Oct 1, 2012, 152 patients were recruited for the study. Ten patients were subsequently excluded, leaving 142 patients in the intention-to-treat population. Of these 142 patients, 69 were predicted by [ 18 F]-FDG PET to be treatment responders after two cycles of treatment. The 73 predicted non-responders were randomly assigned to group A (n=48) and group B (n=25). Pathological complete responses were noted in 37 (53·6%, 95% CI 41·2–65·7) of the PET responders, 21 (43·8%, 29·5–58·8) of those in group A, and six (24·0%, 9·4–45·1) of those in group B. Incidences of grade 3–4 adverse events were similar in all three groups. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (four in PET responders, five in group A, and three in group B), febrile neutropenia (one, three, and one, respectively), and myalgia (four, none, and one, respectively). Overall, 24 serious adverse events were reported in 15 patients (PET responders: nine events in four [6%] of 67 patients; group A: 14 events in ten [21%] of 47 patients; group B: one event in one [4%] of 25 patients). No deaths occurred during the study. Interpretation In patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, early PET assessment can help to identify non-responders to neoadjuvant docetaxel plus trastuzumab therapy. In these patients, the addition of bevacizumab can increase the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response. This potential new role for PET and the activity of bevacizumab in this setting need to be confirmed in larger phase 3 trials. Funding Roche France.

e20616 Background: With increased use of central venous catheters (CVC) in cancer patients, CVC-Related thrombosis (CRT) reported in about 5% of cases, represents a major problem in oncology practi...

TPS646 Background: For patients with early HER2+ breast cancer at diagnosis, addition of trastuzumab (T) to 6 cycles of preoperative docetaxel (D) can reach a pathological complete response (pCR) in ~50% of cases, and a high rate of conservative surgery. pCR can be predicted by changes of Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) tumor uptake evaluated by Positon Emission Tomography (PET) after one cycle of therapy. In order to increase this pCR rate, adding an antiangiogenic compound could be considered. Pre-clinical and phase I-II data support that the combination of bevacizumab (B) and T is synergistic and safe when patients are chemotherapy naïve. The neoadjuvant AVATAXHER trial (EUDRACT 2009-013410-26) investigates the potential increase of pCR rate by combining B with T and D for patients with HER2+ breast cancer who are not predicted for pCR by FDG PET. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, phase II trial, 2 phases are planned after a selection period: phase I: all patients receive two cycles of therapy combining T (8 mg/kg at the first cycle, then 6 mg/kg) and D (100 mg/m2). FDG PET is also performed within 7 days before cycle 1 (baseline) and less than 3 days before cycle 2 in order to calculate changes of the tumor FDG uptake between baseline and after cycle 1 (ΔSUV). Phase 2: if ΔSUV≥70%, patients will continue to receive T and D for (cycles 3 to 6: D 100 mg/m2 + T 6 mg/kg); if ΔSUV2 + T 6 mg/kg + B 15 mg/kg) or arm B ( cycles 3 to 6: D 100 mg/m2 + T 6 mg/kg). The primary endpoint is pCR rate evaluated post-surgery 4 to 6 weeks after the last treatment of cycle 6. Enrolment began in May 2010 and 125 patients were to be recruited in 26 sites. According to the hypothesis that 60% of patients will have a ΔSUV