Search

Background: Assessment of oral epithelial dysplasia is the gold standard for investigating the risk of malignant progression. The World Health Organization (WHO) methods and the binary system have limitations. This study assess the inter- and intra-observer variability of the architectural and cytological criteria and the classification of the presence and degree of epithelial dysplasia in oral lichen planus (OLP) and oral lichenoid lesion (OLL), using both the 2017 WHO criteria and the binary system., Material and Methods: The sample consisted of 65 biopsies from lesions classified as OLP and OLL according to the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (AAOMP) criteria. The histological slides were reevaluated by two oral pathologists., Results: The individual alterations with most inter-observer disagreement were atypical mitotic figures (43.1%), loss of cohesion between epithelial cells (38.5%) and drop shape rete ridges ridges (38.5%). Inter-observer agreement analysis did not show statistically significant agreement regarding the classification of epithelial dysplasia grade by WHO criteria, only regarding the binary system classification (k=0.257; p =0.035). Intra-observer agreement analysis by evaluator 1 showed that the classification of epithelial dysplasia grade according to both methods had statistically significant agreement (k=0.546; p =0.004, k=0.861; p <0.001). Considering evaluator 2, only the evaluation of the WHO system classification showed statistically significant agreement (k=0.593; p =0.010)., Conclusions: The evaluation of epithelial dysplasia is subjective and focal changes and inflammatory infiltrate, characteristic of OLP and OLL, can increase the degree of disagreement among evaluators. The binary system presents better inter-observer agreement, while the WHO system presents better intra-observer agreement. Key words: Oral lichen planus, oral lichenoid lesion, oral lichenoid disease, dysplasia, inter-observer variation., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest No conflict of interest to disclose., (Copyright: © 2024 Medicina Oral S.L.)

Actinic prurigo is a photodermatosis that can affect the skin, conjunctiva and lips. It is caused by an abnormal reaction to sunlight and is more common in high-altitude living people, mainly in indigenous descendants. The diagnosis of actinic prurigo can be challenging, mainly when lip lesions are the only manifestation, which is not a common clinical presentation. The aim of this article is to report two cases of actinic prurigo showing only lip lesions. The patients were Afro-American and were unaware of possible Indian ancestry. Clinical exam, photographs, videoroscopy examination and biopsy were performed, and the diagnosis of actinic prurigo was established. Topical corticosteroid and lip balm with ultraviolet protection were prescribed with excellent results. The relevance of this report is to show that although some patients may not demonstrate the classical clinical presentation of actinic prurigo, the associated clinical and histological exams are determinants for the correct diagnosis and successful treatment of this disease.