Search

Let $G(V,E)$ be a simple graph with $m$ edges. For a given integer $k$, a $k$-shifted antimagic labeling is a bijection $f: E(G) \to \{k+1, k+2, \ldots, k+m\}$ such that all vertices have different vertex-sums, where the vertex-sum of a vertex $v$ is the total of the labels assigned to the edges incident to $v$. A graph $G$ is {\it $k$-shifted antimagic} if it admits a $k$-shifted antimagic labeling. For the special case when $k=0$, a $0$-shifted antimagic labeling is known as {\it antimagic labeling}; and $G$ is {\it antimagic} if it admits an antimagic labeling. A spider is a tree with exactly one vertex of degree greater than two. A spider forest is a graph where each component is a spider. In this article, we prove that certain spider forests are $k$-shifted antimagic for all $k \geq 0$. In addition, we show that for a spider forest $G$ with $m$ edges, there exists a positive integer $k_0< m$ such that $G$ is $k$-shifted antimagic for all $k \geq k_0$ and $k \leq -(m+k_0+1)$., Comment: 14 pages, 3 figures

The concept of antimagic labelings of a graph is to produce distinct vertex sums by labeling edges through consecutive numbers starting from one. A long-standing conjecture is that every connected graph, except a single edge, is antimagic. Some graphs are known to be antimagic, but little has been known about sparse graphs, not even trees. This paper studies a weak version called $k$-shifted-antimagic labelings which allow the consecutive numbers starting from $k+1$, instead of starting from 1, where $k$ can be any integer. This paper establishes connections among various concepts proposed in the literature of antimagic labelings and extends previous results in three aspects: $\bullet$ Some classes of graphs, including trees and graphs whose vertices are of odd degrees, which have not been verified to be antimagic are shown to be $k$-shifted-antimagic for sufficiently large $k$. $\bullet$ Some graphs are proved $k$-shifted-antimagic for all $k$, while some are proved not for some particular $k$. $\bullet$ Disconnected graphs are also considered.

A graph $G=(V,E)$ is strongly antimagic, if there is a bijective mapping $f: E \to \{1,2,\ldots,|E|\}$ such that for any two vertices $u\neq v$, not only $\sum_{e \in E(u)}f(e) \ne \sum_{e\in E(v)}f(e)$ and also $\sum_{e \in E(u)}f(e) < \sum_{e\in E(v)}f(e)$ whenever $\deg(u)< \deg(v) $, where $E(u)$ is the set of edges incident to $u$. In this paper, we prove that double spiders, the trees contains exactly two vertices of degree at least 3, are strongly antimagic., Comment: 24 pages

A graph $G=(V,E)$ is antimagic if there is a one-to-one correspondence $f: E \to \{1,2,\ldots, |E|\}$ such that for any two vertices $u,v$, $\sum_{e \in E(u)}f(e) \ne \sum_{e\in E(v)}f(e)$. It is known that bipartite regular graphs are antimagic and non-bipartite regular graphs of odd degree at least three are antimagic. Whether all non-bipartite regular graphs of even degree are antimagic remained an open problem. In this paper, we solve this problem and prove that all even degree regular graphs are antimagic. The paper was submitted to December 2014 by Journal of Graph Theory., Comment: 13 pages, 3 figures