Search

Background: Hemodynamic impact of residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is not always univocally measured by transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) assessment alone. When analyzing TEER procedure result, operators often encounter discrepancy between TEE guidance and invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Objectives: This study sought to investigate the role of invasive hemodynamic monitoring during mitral valve TEER procedure on top of TEE guidance. Methods: We analyzed 78 patients with moderate-to-severe or severe MR who underwent TEER. Mitral pulse pressure fraction (MPF) was extracted from intraprocedural continuous left atrial pressure monitoring. Twenty-three patients with the same grade of MR not undergoing TEER were included as a control group. At follow-up, clinical and functional status in the majority of patients undergoing TEER were reassessed by NYHA classification and the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Results: TEER significantly reduced MR burden on both TEE guidance and invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Post-TEER MPF was significantly reduced compared to both pre-TEER setting (P

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has been established as a safe and effective option for treating patients with severe symptomatic degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) who are at prohibitive surgical risk. However, the significant cost presents a considerable disease burden in low-income countries. This case details the treatment of a high-surgical-risk patient with severe degenerative MR by using the GeminiOne (Peijia Medical) system—a novel Chinese TEER device.

Abstract Aims Mitral valve transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER) has been established as a suitable alternative to mitral valve surgery in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and high surgical risk. The PASCAL system represents a novel device, potentially augmenting the toolkit for TEER. The aim of this study was to assess and compare short and 1 year safety and efficacy of the PASCAL and MitraClip systems for TEER. Methods and results Procedural, short, and 1 year outcomes of a 1:2 propensity‐matched cohort including 41 PASCAL and 82 MitraClip cases were investigated. Matching was based on clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and functional characteristics. The primary endpoints assessed were procedural success [as defined by the Mitral Valve Academy Research Consortium (MVARC)], residual MR, functional class, and a composite endpoint comprising death, heart failure hospitalization, and mitral valve re‐intervention. We found for the PASCAL and the matched MitraClip cohort no significant differences in MVARC defined technical (90.2% vs. 95.1%, P = 0.44), device (90.2% vs. 89.0%, P = 1.0), or procedural (87.8% vs. 80.5%, P = 0.45) success rates. Accordingly, the overall MR reduction and improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class were comparable (1 year follow‐up: MR ≤ 2 95% vs. 93.6%, P = 1.0; NYHA ≤ 2 57.1% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.59). The composite outcome revealed no statistically significant difference between both devices (1 year follow‐up: 31.7% vs. 37.8%, P = 0.55). Interestingly, we found at both short and 1 year follow‐up a significantly higher rate of patients with none or trace MR in the PASCAL‐treated cohort (short follow‐up: 17.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.0081; 1 year follow‐up: 25% vs. 0%, P = 0.0016). Conversely, the rate of aborted device implantations due to an elevated transmitral gradient was higher in PASCAL interventions (9.8% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.04). Conclusions Transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair using the PASCAL or MitraClip device results in favourable and comparable outcomes regarding safety, efficacy, and clinical improvement after 1 year.

Aims: Mitral valve transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair (TEER) has been established as a suitable alternative to mitral valve surgery in patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and high surgical risk. The PASCAL system represents a novel device, potentially augmenting the toolkit for TEER. The aim of this study was to assess and compare short and 1 year safety and efficacy of the PASCAL and MitraClip systems for TEER. Methods and results: Procedural, short, and 1 year outcomes of a 1:2 propensity‐matched cohort including 41 PASCAL and 82 MitraClip cases were investigated. Matching was based on clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and functional characteristics. The primary endpoints assessed were procedural success [as defined by the Mitral Valve Academy Research Consortium (MVARC)], residual MR, functional class, and a composite endpoint comprising death, heart failure hospitalization, and mitral valve re‐intervention. We found for the PASCAL and the matched MitraClip cohort no significant differences in MVARC defined technical (90.2% vs. 95.1%, P = 0.44), device (90.2% vs. 89.0%, P = 1.0), or procedural (87.8% vs. 80.5%, P = 0.45) success rates. Accordingly, the overall MR reduction and improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class were comparable (1 year follow‐up: MR ≤ 2 95% vs. 93.6%, P = 1.0; NYHA ≤ 2 57.1% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.59). The composite outcome revealed no statistically significant difference between both devices (1 year follow‐up: 31.7% vs. 37.8%, P = 0.55). Interestingly, we found at both short and 1 year follow‐up a significantly higher rate of patients with none or trace MR in the PASCAL‐treated cohort (short follow‐up: 17.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.0081; 1 year follow‐up: 25% vs. 0%, P = 0.0016). Conversely, the rate of aborted device implantations due to an elevated transmitral gradient was higher in PASCAL interventions (9.8% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.04). Conclusions: Transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair using the PASCAL or MitraClip device results in favourable and comparable outcomes regarding safety, efficacy, and clinical improvement after 1 year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors investigated whether iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD) closure post-transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair (TMVR) is superior to conservative therapy (CT) and whether outcomes (death/heart failure [HF] hospitalization) differ between patients with and without an iASD post-TMVR. Transseptal access for TMVR can create an iASD, which is associated with impaired outcomes. Controversially, the creation of an iASD in HF has been linked to improved hemodynamics. 80 patients with an iASD and relevant left-to-right shunting (Qp:Qs ≥1.3) 30 days following TMVR were randomized to CT or interventional closure of the iASD (MITHRAS [Closure of Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defect Following Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair] cohort), and 235 patients without an iASD served as a comparative cohort. All patients of the MITHRAS cohort (mean age 77 ± 9 years, 39% women) received their allocated treatment, and follow-up was completed for all MITHRAS and comparative cohort (mean age 77 ± 8 years, 47% women) patients. Twelve months post-TMVR, there was no significant difference in the combined endpoint of death or HF hospitalization within the MITHRAS cohort (iASD closure: 35% vs CT 50%; P = 0.26). The combined endpoint was more frequent among patients within the MITHRAS cohort as opposed to the comparative cohort (43% vs 17%; P < 0.0001), primarily driven by a higher rate of HF hospitalization (34% vs 8%; P = 0.004). In this randomized controlled trial, interventional closure of a relevant iASD 1 month after TMVR did not result in improved clinical outcomes at 12 months post-TMVR. Patients with an iASD are at higher risk for HF hospitalization independent of iASD management and warrant close follow-up. (Closure of Iatrogenic Atrial Septal Defect Following Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair [MITHRAS]; NCT03024268) [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hemodynamic impact of residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is not always univocally measured by transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) assessment alone. When analyzing TEER procedure result, operators often encounter discrepancy between TEE guidance and invasive hemodynamic monitoring., Objectives: This study sought to investigate the role of invasive hemodynamic monitoring during mitral valve TEER procedure on top of TEE guidance., Methods: We analyzed 78 patients with moderate-to-severe or severe MR who underwent TEER. Mitral pulse pressure fraction (MPF) was extracted from intraprocedural continuous left atrial pressure monitoring. Twenty-three patients with the same grade of MR not undergoing TEER were included as a control group. At follow-up, clinical and functional status in the majority of patients undergoing TEER were reassessed by NYHA classification and the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)., Results: TEER significantly reduced MR burden on both TEE guidance and invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Post-TEER MPF was significantly reduced compared to both pre-TEER setting ( P  < 0.001) and control group ( P  < 0.001). At follow-up, while MR reduction assessed by TEE was associated with an improved functional status in terms of the 12-item KCCQ but not of NYHA classification, a greater reduction in MPF was associated with a significant amelioration of both NYHA classification ( P  = 0.036) and 12-item KCCQ ( P  = 0.032)., Conclusions: MPF could provide an immediate estimate of the real hemodynamic impact of MR and a prompt prediction of the functional improvement after TEER., Competing Interests: Prof Leone has received speaking honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Medtronic, Bracco Imaging and Abiomed. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Hemodynamically significant mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with major morbidity and mortality. Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is an interventional procedure for MR, which has gained popularity in recent years as an alternative solution to surgical valve repair in high-risk surgical candidates. However, there are no definite guidelines following TEER failures to determine if patients would benefit from a redo TEER or surgical mitral valve (MV) repair. Here, we present one such clinical dilemma. In patients who have failed the TEER of the MV, surgical risk must be determined in conjunction with a multidisciplinary team, as surgical MV replacement may be performed at advanced centers in high-risk patients with good results., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, Dasari et al.)