Search

Neprilysin (NEP) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) are two key zinc-dependent metallopeptidases in the natriuretic peptide and kinin systems and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, respectively. They play an important role in blood pressure regulation and reducing the risk of heart failure. Vasopeptidase inhibitors omapatrilat and sampatrilat possess dual activity against these enzymes by blocking the ACE-dependent conversion of angiotensin I to the potent vasoconstrictor angiotensin II while simultaneously halting the NEP-dependent degradation of vasodilator atrial natriuretic peptide. Here, we report crystal structures of omapatrilat, sampatrilat, and sampatrilat-ASP (a sampatrilat analogue) in complex with NEP at 1.75, 2.65, and 2.6 A, respectively. A detailed analysis of these structures and the corresponding structures of ACE with these inhibitors has provided the molecular basis of dual inhibitor recognition involving the catalytic site in both enzymes. This new information will be very useful in the design of safer and more selective vasopeptidase inhibitors of NEP and ACE for effective treatment in hypertension and heart failure.

Previously we had shown that a vasopeptidase inhibitor, combination drug containing angiotensin converting enzyme and neprilysin inhibitors, was an effective treatment for diabetes vascular and neural complications. However, once in clinical trials, side effects prevented further development of this class of drugs. This lead to development of sacubitril/valsartan, combination drug similar to vasopeptidase inhibitors containing angiotensin II receptor blocker and neprilysin inhibitor that we hypothesized would be also an effective treatment for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Using a rat model of type 2 diabetes, early and late intervention protocols, 4 and 12 weeks post hyperglycemia, respectively, rats were treated daily by gavage with valsartan or sacubitril/valsartan for 12 weeks followed by an extensive evaluation of vascular and neural endpoints. The results demonstrated that efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan in improving vascular and neural function was superior to valsartan alone. In the late intervention protocol, treatment of the diabetic rats was initiated well after the appearance of vascular and neural complications. Sacubitril/valsartan treatment was found to not only slow progression of vascular and neural deficits but also stimulate restoration of vascular reactivity, motor and sensory nerve conduction velocities and sensitivity/regeneration of sensory nerves of the skin and cornea. These studies suggest that sacubitril/valsartan may be an effective treatment for diabetic peripheral neuropathy and since it already has FDA approval for treatment of heart failure advancing this drug to clinical trials could proceed quickly. Disclosure M.A. Yorek: None.

This article overviews the natriuretic peptides (NPs) system, its role and the development of NP-based treatment of heart failure (HF)., After its discovery in the early 1980s, the natriuretic peptide (NP) system has been extensively characterized and its potential influence in the development and progression of heart failure (HF) has been investigated. HF is a syndrome characterized by the activation of different neurohormonal systems, predominantly the renin–angiotensin (Ang)–aldosterone system (RAAS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), but also the NP system. Pharmacological interventions have been developed to counteract the neuroendocrine dysregulation, through the down modulation of RAAS with ACE (Ang-converting enzyme) inhibitors, ARBs (Ang receptor blockers) and mineralcorticoid antagonists and of SNS with β-blockers. In the last years, growing attention has been paid to the NP system. In the present review, we have summarized the current knowledge on the NP system, focusing on its role in HF and we provide an overview of the pharmacological attempts to modulate NP in HF: from the negative results of the study with neprilysin (NEP) inhibitors, alone or associated with an ACE inhibitor and vasopeptidase inhibitors, to the most recently and extremely encouraging results obtained with the new pharmacological class of Ang receptor and NEP inhibitor, currently defined ARNI (Ang receptor NEP inhibitor). Indeed, this new class of drugs to manage HF, supported by the recent results and a vast clinical development programme, may prompt a conceptual shift in the treatment of HF, moving from the inhibition of RAAS and SNS to a more integrated target to rebalance neurohormonal dysregulation in HF.

We have demonstrated that treating diet-induced obese (DIO) mice with the vasopeptidase inhibitor ilepatril improved neural function. Vasopeptidase inhibitors block angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and neutral endopeptidase (NEP) activity. We propose that increased activity of ACE and NEP contributes to pathophysiology of DIO. To address this issue C57Bl/6J mice or mice deficient in NEP were fed a high-fat diet and treated with ilepatril, enalapril, ACE inhibitor, or candoxatril, NEP inhibitor, using both prevention and intervention protocols. Endpoints included glucose utilization and neural function determination. In the prevention study glucose tolerance was impaired in DIO C57Bl/6J mice and improved with ilepatril or enalapril. Sensory nerve conduction velocity, thermal nociception, and intraepidermal nerve fiber density were impaired in DIO C57Bl/6J mice and improved with ilepatril or candoxatril. In the intervention study only enalapril improved glucose tolerance. Sensory nerve conduction velocity and intraepidermal nerve fiber density were improved by all three treatments, whereas thermal nociception was improved by ilepatril or candoxatril. In NEP-deficient mice DIO impaired glucose utilization and this was improved with enalapril. Nerve function was not impaired by DIO in NEP-deficient mice. These studies suggest that ACE and NEP play a role in pathophysiology associated with DIO.

The conventional antihypertensive therapies including renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system antagonists (converting enzyme inhibitors, receptor blockers, renin inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor blockers), diuretics, β-blockers, and calcium channel blockers are variably successful in achieving the challenging target blood pressure values in hypertensive patients. Difficult to treat hypertension is still a commonly observed problem world-wide. A number of drugs are considered to be used as novel therapies for hypertension. Renalase supplementation, vasopeptidase inhibitors, endothelin antagonists, and especially aldosterone antagonists (aldosterone synthase inhibitors and novel selective mineralocorticoid receptor blockers) are considered an option in resistant hypertension. In addition, the aldosterone antagonists as well as (pro)renin receptor blockers or AT(2) receptor agonists might attenuate end-organ damage. This array of medications has now been complemented by a number of new approaches of non-pharmacological strategies including vaccination, genomic interference, controlled breathing, baroreflex activation, and probably most successfully renal denervation techniques. However, the progress on innovative therapies seems to be slow and the problem of resistant hypertension and proper blood pressure control appears to be still persisting. Therefore the regimens of currently available drugs are being fine-tuned, resulting in the establishment of several novel fixed-dose combinations including triple combinations with the aim to facilitate proper blood pressure control. It remains an exciting question which approach will confer the best blood pressure control and risk reduction in this tricky disease.

Human ACE (angiotensin-I-converting enzyme) has long been regarded as an excellent target for the treatment of hypertension and related cardiovascular diseases. Highly potent inhibitors have been developed and are extensively used in the clinic. To develop inhibitors with higher therapeutic efficacy and reduced side effects, recent efforts have been directed towards the discovery of compounds able to simultaneously block more than one zinc metallopeptidase (apart from ACE) involved in blood pressure regulation in humans, such as neprilysin and ECE-1 (endothelin-converting enzyme-1). In the present paper, we show the first structures of testis ACE [C-ACE, which is identical with the C-domain of somatic ACE and the dominant domain responsible for blood pressure regulation, at 1.97Å (1 Å=0.1 nm)] and the N-domain of somatic ACE (N-ACE, at 2.15Å) in complex with a highly potent and selective dual ACE/ECE-1 inhibitor. The structural determinants revealed unique features of the binding of two molecules of the dual inhibitor in the active site of C-ACE. In both structures, the first molecule is positioned in the obligatory binding site and has a bulky bicyclic P1′ residue with the unusual R configuration which, surprisingly, is accommodated by the large S2′ pocket. In the C-ACE complex, the isoxazole phenyl group of the second molecule makes strong pi–pi stacking interactions with the amino benzoyl group of the first molecule locking them in a ‘hand-shake’ conformation. These features, for the first time, highlight the unusual architecture and flexibility of the active site of C-ACE, which could be further utilized for structure-based design of new C-ACE or vasopeptidase inhibitors.

Hypertension is the most common risk factor for cardiovascular disease, stroke, renal failure, and death. Recent drug monitoring studies found non-adherence to BP lowering therapy in 25% to 65% of patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (TRH). This review focuses on the latest development of antihypertensive medication, such as vasopeptidase inhibitors, aldosterone synthase inhibitors, Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase Inhibitors, agonists of natriuretic peptide receptor, Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide Receptor Agonist, a novel mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, inhibitors of aminopeptidase A, dopamine β-hydroxylase inhibitor, intestinal Na+/H+ exchanger 3 inhibitor and other agents.

A novel family of peptidomimetics incorporating fluoroalkyl groups, mainly a trifluoromethyl, in alpha-position to a zinc(II)-binding thiol function, was synthesized in solution as well as in solid-phase. These compounds showed inhibitory potency in the nanomolar range against both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and neutral endopeptidase (NEP), whereas no inhibition of endothelin-converting enzyme-1 (ECE-1) was observed. The trifluoromethyl-derivatives were more potent than the parent unfluorinated analogues in the case of ACE, and less potent in the case of NEP. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Vasopeptidase inhibitors are drugs that inhibit angiotensin-converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase (NEP). The latter is a protease that degrades vasoactive peptides and is increased in diabetes. We have previously shown that treating streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats, an animal model of type 1 diabetes, with AVE7688, a vasopeptidase inhibitor, improves neurovascular and neural function. In this study, we determined the effect of treating Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats, an animal model of type 2 diabetes, with AVE7688 on vascular and neural function.ZDF rats at 12 weeks of age were treated for 12 weeks with AVE7688 (500 mg/kg diet). Afterwards, vascular reactivity of epineurial arterioles of the sciatic nerve and nerve conduction velocity and blood flow was determined.Vascular and neural function was significantly impaired in ZDF rats compared with age-matched lean (control) rats. Treating ZDF rats with AVE7688 improved vascular relaxation to acetylcholine and calcitonin gene-related peptide in epineurial arterioles. Motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity, endoneurial blood flow and thermal nociception end-points were also improved by treatment compared with untreated ZDF rats. Superoxide and expression of NEP were increased in epineurial arterioles from ZDF rats and attenuated by treatment with AVE7688.AVE7688 is an effective treatment for microvascular and neural disease in ZDF rats. Thus, vasopeptidase inhibitors may be an effective treatment for diabetic microvascular and neural complication in type 2 diabetes.

Cardiovascular diseases (CDs) are among the most encountered pathologies in western countries; with obesity reaching pandemic proportions, they are soon to become a worldwide problem. High blood pressure is the main risk factor for CDs, and its tight control is an imperative for the treatment of complications such as renal diseases, heart failure, and atherosclerosis. Blood homeostasis and vascular tone are regulated through at least 3 major closely interrelated pathways in which zinc metallopeptidases modulate the concentration of vasoactive mediators. Those extensively studied vasopeptidases were therefore rapidly targeted with specific inhibitors in order to control the levels of vasoconstrictors [angiotensin II (AII) and endothelin-1 (ET-1)] and vasodilators [bradykinin (BK) and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP)], thereby controlling blood pressure. The first class of inhibitors to be developed were against angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), recently followed by dual inhibitors of ACE/neprylisin (NEP), NEP/endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE), and finally triple ACE/NEP/ECE inhibitors. The dual and triple inhibitors are defined as vasopeptidase inhibitors (VPI). In addition to their ability to effectively lower blood pressure in hypertensive patients, drugs targeting these enzymes also displayed antiinflammatory and antifibrotic activities. The major point emerging from recent studies undertaken to improve the management of CDs is that the combined action of different therapeutic strategies (ie, simultaneous modulation of several neurohumoral mediators) shows better results than conservative therapeutic approaches. In this review, we historically present the advances made in the comprehension of the different mechanisms of blood pressure regulation and some of the drugs that arose from this understanding.

In epineurial arterioles, acetylcholine-mediated vascular relaxation is mediated by nitric oxide and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF), and both mechanisms are impaired by diabetes. The mediator responsible for the effect of EDHF is unknown. In epineurial arterioles, C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) has properties consistent with EDHF-like activity. Epineurial arterioles express CNP, and exogenous CNP causes a concentration-dependent vascular relaxation. In streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats, CNP-mediated vascular relaxation in epineurial arterioles is decreased. Since CNP may be a regulator of vascular function, a vasopeptidase inhibitor may be an effective treatment for diabetes-induced vascular and neural disease. Vasopeptidase inhibitors inhibit ACE activity and neutral endopeptidase, which degrades natriuretic peptides. Streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats were treated with AVE7688 (450 mg/kg in the diet), a vasopeptidase inhibitor, for 8–10 weeks after 4 weeks of untreated diabetes. Treatment of diabetic rats corrected the diabetes-induced decrease in endoneurial blood flow, significantly improved motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity, prevented the development of hypoalgesia in the hind paw, and reduced superoxide and nitrotyrosine levels in epineurial arterioles. The diabetes-induced decrease in acetylcholine-mediated vascular relaxation by epineurial arterioles was significantly improved with treatment. These studies suggest that vasopeptidase inhibitors may be an effective approach for the treatment of diabetic vascular and neural dysfunction.

The role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the progression of chronic kidney disease The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is a well known regulator of blood pressure (BP) and determinant of target-organ damage. It controls fluid and electrolyte balance through coordinated effects on the heart, blood vessels, and Kidneys. Angiotensin II (AII) is the main effector of the RAAS and exerts its vasoconstrictor effect predominantly on the postglomerular arterioles, thereby increasing the glomerular hydraulic pressure and the ultrafiltration of plasma proteins, effects that may contribute to the onset and progression of chronic renal damage. AII may also directly contribute to accelerate renal damage by sustaining cell growth, inflammation, and fibrosis. Interventions that inhibit the activity of the RAAS are renoprotective and may slow or even halt the progression of chronic nephropathies. ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists can be used in combination to maximize RAAS inhibition and more effectively reduce proteinuria and GFR decline in diabetic and nondiabetic renal disease. Recent evidence suggests that add-on therapy with an aldosterone antagonist may further increase renoprotection, but may also enhance the risk hyperkalemia. Maximized RAAS inhibition, combined with intensified blood pressure control (and metabolic control in diabetics) and amelioration of dyslipidemia in a multimodal approach including lifestyle modifications (Remission Clinic), may achieve remission of proteinuria and renal function stabilization in a substantial proportion of patients with proteinuric renal disease. Ongoing studies will tell whether novel drugs inhibiting the RAAS, such as the renin inhibitors or the vasopeptidase inhibitors, may offer additional benefits to those who do not respond, or only partially respond, to this multimodal regimen.

Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of chronic renal failure in westernized countries. The polymorphism in angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), which leads to higher than normal levels of this enzyme, is a predictor of nephropathy in patients with diabetes. As increasing the levels of ACE by approximately 50% in this polymorphism is only calculated to increase the levels of angiotensin II by5%, whereas the levels of bradykinin will decrease by 20%, bradykinin may be nephroprotective. In diabetic mice without bradykinin B2 receptors, the only parameter that is altered compared with the diabetic mouse, is that the nephropathy is worse. Thus, in diabetic mice without a bradykinin receptor (Bdrb2(-/-)Ins2(+/C96Y)), compared with diabetic mice (Bdrb2(+/+)/Ins2(+/C96Y)), there is a greater kidney weight, increased urinary albumin output, and glomeruli mesangial sclerosis. In addition to reducing the levels of angiotensin II, vasopeptidase inhibitors increase the level of bradykinin. A vasopeptidase inhibitor (AVE7688) has been shown to prevent nephropathy developing and to ameliorate it once it has developed in Zucker diabetic rats. The nephroprotective effects (reduced albumin secretion and reduced kidney damage) of AVE7688 in Zucker diabetic rats were partially prevented by the bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist icatibant. These data establish that stimulation of bradykinin B2 receptors is a target in diabetic nephropathy.

Vasopeptidase inhibition (i.e., the simultaneous inhibition of both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and neutral endopeptidase) can ameliorate diabetic nephropathy. We investigated whether this nephroprotection is mediated by the bradykinin B2 receptor. In all, 43 obese Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF/Gmi-fa/fa) rats aged 21 weeks were separated into four groups and treated for 26 weeks with either placebo, the bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist icatibant (500 μg kg−1 day−1 s.c. infusion), the vasopeptidase inhibitor AVE7688 (45 mg kg−1 day−1 in chow), or AVE7688 plus icatibant. Nephropathy was assessed as albuminuria at age 31 and 39 weeks, and by histopathologic scoring at the end of the treatment period. All animals had established diabetes mellitus (blood glucose >20 mmol l−1) and marked albuminuria at baseline. Blood glucose was not influenced by any treatment. Icatibant alone did not influence albuminuria (8.6±1.6 vs placebo 9.5±1.3 mg kg−1 h−1). AVE7688 reduced albuminuria at week 31 markedly to 1.1±0.1 mg kg−1 h−1 and reduced glomerular and tubulo-interstitial kidney damage at week 47. In the AVE7688 plus icatibant group, proteinuria was significantly higher than in the AVE7688 only group (2.0±0.6 mg kg−1 h−1), but still reduced compared to placebo. In addition, icatibant partly antagonized the tubulo-interstitial protection mediated by AVE7688. We conclude that vasopeptidase inhibition provides nephroprotection in rats with type II diabetic nephropathy, which is partly mediated by bradykinin B2 receptor activation. Keywords: Zucker diabetic fatty rat, diabetic nephropathy, vasopeptidase inhibition, AVE7688 Introduction Diabetic nephropathy is a devastating disease characterized by progressive impairment of glomerular function and, ultimately, end-stage renal disease. As a result of the diabetes epidemic in Westernized countries, the incidence of diabetic nephropathy is predicted to increase substantially over the next decade. In fact, type II diabetes has already become the most common single cause for renal replacement therapy in most industrialized countries (Ismail et al., 1999). Several landmark trials have demonstrated convincingly that blockade of the renin–angiotensin system, including inhibition of ACE, is effective to retard the progression of diabetic nephropathy and to prevent end-stage renal failure (Lewis et al., 1993; 2001; HOPE Study Investigators, 2000; Brenner et al., 2001). Part of the pharmacological action of ACE inhibitors is based on inhibition of bradykinin degradation, leading to increased stimulation of the bradykinin B2 receptor (Wirth et al., 1997). Blockade of the bradykinin B2 receptor partially prevented the cardiovascular benefits of ACE inhibition in different disease models, demonstrating the pharmacological relevance of bradykinin signaling in cardiovascular disease (for a review, see Linz et al., 1995). As bradykinin is degraded by both ACE and neutral endopeptidase, simultaneous inhibition of both enzymes by the novel vasopeptidase inhibitors is supposed to increase renal bradykinin concentrations and protect the diabetic kidney even more effectively than selective ACE inhibition alone (Molinaro et al., 2002). However, the relative role of bradykinin in the therapeutic action of vasopeptidase inhibitors in diabetic nephropathy has not been investigated so far. Recent data indicate that indeed, vasopeptidase inhibitors may be superior over pure ACE inhibitors, possibly related to their greater potency in increasing tissue bradykinin concentrations. The vasopeptidase inhibitor omapatrilat has shown superior nephroprotection over selective ACE inhibition in nondiabetic nephropathy (Taal et al., 2001) and in a hypoinsulinaemic, hypertensive model (Tikkanen et al., 1998; Davis et al., 2003). In the Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rat, a type II diabetes animal model, the vasopeptidase inhibitor AVE7688 prevents nephropathy when treatment is started early (Schafer et al., 2003) and reduces proteinuria when diabetes and nephropathy are established (Schafer et al., 2004). In order to further elucidate the mechanism behind these nephroprotective effects, we investigated the effects of AVE7688 on functional and morphological end points in a setting of established diabetic nephropathy in the presence and absence of the bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist, icatibant. Our data indicate that the beneficial effects of vasopeptidase inhibition in type II diabetic nephropathy are partially, but not completely, mediated by the bradykinin B2 receptor.

Background Recent reports suggest that existing antihypertensive agents may not have sufficient efficacy to control blood pressure (BP) in many patients. Omapatrilat, an agent under development, has been shown to have significantly greater antihypertensive efficacy than existing agents, but may also carry increased risk of angioedema. We compared the efficacy and safety of omapatrilat to a representative angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, enalapril. Methods The Omapatrilat Cardiovascular Treatment vs. Enalapril (OCTAVE) trial is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, 24-week trial in 25,302 patients with untreated or uncontrolled hypertension conducted in 3298 office-based sites in 12 countries. Subjects were randomized to omapatrilat 10 mg or enalapril 5 mg as initial therapy for hypertension (group 1, n = 9292), replacement for existing antihypertensive therapy (group 2, n =11,224), or in addition to existing antihypertensive therapy (group 3, n = 4751). Study drug was force-titrated at week 2 and electively titrated at weeks 4 and 6 to a maximum of omapatrilat 80 mg or enalapril 40 mg once daily. At weeks 8 and 16, adjunctive antihypertensive medications were added electively to achieve target BP. Results Omapatrilat reduced systolic BP 3.6 mm Hg more than enalapril at week 8, and was associated with less use of adjunctive antihypertensive therapy by week 24 (19% v 27%; P < 0.001 for both comparisons). Subjects randomized to omapatrilat were more likely to reach BP target, regardless of demographics or comorbid conditions and whether omapatrilat was used as initial therapy, replacement for existing therapy, or in addition to existing therapy. Angioedema was more frequent with omapatrilat than enalapril (2.17% v 0.68%). Two omapatrilat-treated subjects experienced angioedema with airway compromise, which was successfully treated. Conclusions Omapatrilat provided broadly superior antihypertensive efficacy when used in a setting resembling clinical practice. Angioedema was more common than with enalapril but life-threatening angioedema was rare. The risk–benefit profile for omapatrilat in clinical use therefore appears likely to be favorable in appropriate patients.

Inhibition of nitric oxide synthases causes systemic hypertension and renal injury in rats. Our objective was to examine whether omapatrilat, a vasopeptidase inhibitor that inhibits both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and neutral endopeptidase, could induce better regression of renal injury than ACE inhibitor alone. Ten groups of rats were studied. They were fed either a normal (0.8% NaCl) or a high (4% NaCl) sodium diet. Eight of these groups received N G -nitro- l -arginine methyl ester ( l -NAME, 20 mg · kg −1 · d −1 ) in their drinking water. After 4 weeks, 1 group on each diet was killed and considered the l -NAME group, whereas the others received l -NAME alone, captopril (200 mg · kg −1 · d −1 ) plus l -NAME, or omapatrilat (80 mg · kg −1 · d −1 ) plus l -NAME for 4 additional weeks. In rats receiving l -NAME alone for 8 weeks, the mortality rate was ≈90%, irrespective of the diet. In contrast, all rats survived in the captopril and the omapatrilat groups. In rats fed a normal-sodium diet, captopril and omapatrilat normalized systolic blood pressure and induced a complete regression of renal injury. Creatinine clearance and proteinuria were also normalized. In the high-sodium-diet groups, both treatments were less efficient: blood pressure remained elevated, and the regression of renal fibrosis was only partial. Although proteinuria decreased significantly with captopril or omapatrilat, creatinine clearance remained lower than in the controls. These results demonstrate that, in nitric oxide–deficient rats fed a normal-sodium diet, ACE and vasopeptidase inhibitors exhibit a marked renoprotective effect, whereas these treatments are less efficient in rats fed a high-sodium diet.

Background Vasopeptidase inhibitors are a new class of compounds that inhibit both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and neutral endopeptidase. This study determined whether treatment with the vasopeptidase inhibitor omapatrilat (OMA) produced different effects on renal and cardiovascular structure compared with inhibition of ACE by enalapril (ENP) in rats with two-kidney, one clip hypertension (2K1C). Methods Hypertensive 2K1C rats were randomized into four groups and studied for another 8 weeks: no treatment, OMA, ENP or ENP combined with the diuretic hydrochlorothiazide (ENP + HCTZ). Albuminuria, vascular and renal histology as well as glomerular expression of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) were determined at the end of the experiment. Results OMA decreased blood pressure slightly better than ENP. However, combination of ENP with a diuretic lowered blood pressure equally effective as OMA. OMA was numerically more efficient in reducing cardiovascular and renal hypertensive changes compared with ENP. In contrast, the combination of ENP + HCTZ was as efficient as OMA. However, OMA lowered overexpression of TGF-beta in the non-clipped kidney better than ENP or ENP +HCTZ. Antihypertensive therapy surprisingly decreased renal function as shown by increased plasma creatinine and urea and decreased creatinine clearance. Conclusion OMA is marginally more potent compared with ENP alone in lowering blood pressure and preventing cardiovascular and renal injury. This effect may be due to slightly better blood pressure reduction because addition of HCTZ enhances the cardio- and nephroprotective capacity of ENP. In contrast, OMA reduces TGF-beta overexpression in the non-clipped kidney better than ENP or ENP + HCTZ. Therefore, vasopeptidase inhibition is not superior to ACE inhibition in the prevention of cardiovascular and renal damage Goldblatt hypertension.

The human cardiovascular system is regulated by haemodynamic, neurohumoral and structural mechanisms. The endothelium and the neurohumoral system play a key role in modulating both vascular tone and structure by producing vasoactive substances, and in the modulation of blood cell adhesion. Although the neurohormonal systems are essential in vascular homeostasis, they become maladaptive in conditions such as hypertension, coronary disease and heart failure. The clinical success of blocking the renin-angiotensin system by angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors and the sympathetic nerve system by β-blockers demonstrates the importance of neurohumoral blockade. The inadequate effect of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) or neutral endopeptidase (NEP) inhibitor monotherapy seen in some patients treated for hypertension or congestive heart failure, and the promising effect seen after their combination, led to the development of drugs that simultaneously inhibit both enzyme systems. Neutral endopeptidase, like ACE, is an endothelial cell surface zinc metallopeptidase with similar structure and catalytic site to ACE. NEP is the major enzymatic pathway for degradation of natriuretic peptides. The natriuretic peptide system can be viewed as the endogenous inhibitor of the renin angiotensin system. The dual metalloprotease inhibitors of ACE and NEP, called vasopeptidase inhibitors therefore represent a new and attractive therapeutic strategy for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. The ability to add incremental benefit over already proven therapy, with an acceptable side-effect profile however, is questionable in this new class of agents.

Vasopeptidase inhibition: A new treatment approach for endothelial dysfunction. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition is a well-established principle in the treatment of endothelial dysfunction. Numerous preclinical and clinical studies have clearly demonstrated the beneficial effects of inhibiting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) in states of impaired endothelial function. The successful use of ACE inhibitors encouraged attempts to inhibit other key enzymes in the regulation of vascular tone, such as the neutral endopeptidase (NEP). Similar to ACE, NEP is an endothelial cell surface metalloproteinase that is involved in the degradation of several regulatory peptides, including the natriuretic peptides, and, thus, NEP inhibition augments vasodilatation and natriuresis through increased levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP). By inhibiting the RAS and potentiating the natriuretic peptide system at the same time, combined NEP/ACE inhibitors, the so-called vasopeptidase inhibitors, reduce vasoconstriction and enhance vasodilatation, thereby decreasing peripheral vascular resistance and blood pressure. Within the vessel wall this may lead to a reduction of vasoconstrictor and proliferative mediators, such as angiotensin II and endothelin-1, and may increase local levels of bradykinin as well as natriuretic peptides. Even though first results of both preclinical and clinical studies indicate that combined inhibition of ACE and NEP by vasopeptidase inhibitors represents a promising strategy in the treatment of hypertension and heart failure, angioedema occurs more frequently on vasopeptidase inhibition as compared to ACE inhibition. To establish vasopeptidase inhibition as a novel option in the treatment of cardiovascular disease, further validation of efficacy and safety of this promising therapeutic principle is mandatory.

The bradykinin-potentiating peptides from Bothrops jararaca venom are the most potent natural inhibitors of the angiotensin-converting enzyme. The biochemical and biological features of these peptides were crucial to demonstrate the pivotal role of the angiotensin-converting enzyme in blood pressure regulation. In the present study, seven bradykinin-potentiating peptides were identified within the C-type natriuretic peptide precursor cloned from snake brain. The bradykinin-potentiating peptides deduced from the B. jararaca brain precursor are strong in vitro inhibitors of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (nanomolar range), and also potentiate the bradykinin effects in ex vivo and in vivo experiments. Two of these peptides are novel bradykinin-potentiating peptides, one of which displays high specificity toward the N-domain active site of the somatic angiotensin-converting enzyme. In situ hybridization studies revealed the presence of the bradykinin-potentiating peptides precursor mRNAs in distinct regions of the B. jararaca brain, such as the ventromedial hypothalamus, the paraventricular nuclei, the paraventricular organ, and the subcommissural organ. The biochemical and pharmacological properties of the brain bradykinin-potentiating peptides, their presence within the neuroendocrine regulator C-type natriuretic peptide precursor, and their expression in regions of the snake brain correlated to neuroendocrine functions, strongly suggest that these peptides belong to a novel class of endogenous vasoactive peptides.

The enormous benefits of inhibition of ACE demonstrate that manipulation of the metabolism of peptide hormones is a valuable therapeutic strategy for cardiovascular disease. Recent attempts to expand these benefits have combined ACE inhibition with inhibition of other peptidases such as neutral endopeptidase (NEP) in a single molecule, a strategy known as vasopeptidase inhibition. NEP metabolizes natriuretic peptides, and NEP inhibition offers the prospect of combining the benefits of increased natriuretic peptide levels with those of ACE inhibition. However, peptidases such as ACE and NEP have many different substrates, and there are complex interactions between ACE inhibition and NEP inhibition. Both ACE and NEP metabolize the kinin peptides bradykinin and kallidin, and NEP also converts angiotensin (Ang) I to Ang-(1-7) and metabolizes Ang II and endothelin. Addition of NEP inhibition to ACE inhibition potentiates the ACE inhibitor–induced increase in kinin levels, increases Ang II levels, reduces Ang-(1-7) levels, and may increase endothelin levels. These additional consequences of combined ACE/NEP inhibition increase the risk of angioedema and may counteract any benefit of ACE inhibition that depends on reduced Ang II levels and increased Ang-(1-7) levels. Further considerations are that the ratio of ACE and NEP inhibition is fixed for vasopeptidase inhibitors, and there is uncertainty how these drugs should be compared with ACE inhibitors. Vasopeptidase inhibitors will therefore require careful evaluation before they are introduced to patient care.

Considerable attention has recently focused on the vasopeptidase inhibitors (VPI), a new class of drug that combines angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor activity with inhibition of natriuretic peptide breakdown. In theory, a drug with these properties may be beneficial both in hypertension and in heart failure. Whilst the efficacy of VPIs in hypertension has been consistently demonstrated in pre-clinical and clinical studies, the role of VPIs, if any, in heart failure is less clear, since numerous small studies have produced conflicting results. Furthermore, preliminary results from the recently completed Omapatrilat Versus Enalapril Randomised Trial of Utility in Reducing Events (OVERTURE) study have failed to establish the VPI, omapatrilat, as a first line therapy in the treatment of chronic heart failure. We review the literature on VPIs in heart failure and discuss possible reasons for the reported lack of benefit over ACE inhibitors.

Background— Combined inhibition of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and neutral endopeptidase (NEP) may produce greater benefits in heart failure than ACE inhibition alone. Methods and Results— We randomly assigned 5770 patients with New York Heart Association class II to IV heart failure to double-blind treatment with either the ACE inhibitor enalapril (10 mg BID, n=2884) or to the ACE-NEP inhibitor omapatrilat (40 mg once daily, n=2886) for a mean of 14.5 months. The primary end point—the combined risk of death or hospitalization for heart failure requiring intravenous treatment—was used prospectively to test both a superiority and noninferiority hypothesis (based on the effect of enalapril in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction [SOLVD] Treatment Trial). A primary end point was achieved in 973 patients in the enalapril group and in 914 patients in the omapatrilat group (hazard ratio 0.94; 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.03, P =0.187)—a result that fulfilled prespecified criteria for noninferiority but not for superiority. The omapatrilat group also had a 9% lower risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization ( P =0.024) and a 6% lower risk of death ( P =0.339). Post hoc analysis of the primary end point with the definition used in the SOLVD Treatment Trial (which included all hospitalizations for heart failure) showed an 11% lower risk in patients treated with omapatrilat (nominal P =0.012). Conclusion— Omapatrilat reduces the risk of death and hospitalization in chronic heart failure but was not more effective than ACE inhibition alone in reducing the risk of a primary clinical event. Between-group differences in favor of omapatrilat observed in secondary and post hoc analyses warrant further study.

The world population is aging and the number of old people is continuously increasing. Arterial structure and function change with age, progressively leading to arterial stiffening. Arterial stiffness is best characterized by measurement of pulse wave velocity (PWV), which is its surrogate marker. It has been shown that PWV could improve cardiovascular event prediction in models that included standard risk factors. Consequently, it might therefore enable better identification of populations at high-risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The present review is focused on a survey of different pharmacological therapeutic options for decreasing arterial stiffness. The influence of several groups of drugs is described: antihypertensive drugs (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers, diuretics, and nitrates), statins, peroral antidiabetics, advanced glycation end-products (AGE) cross-link breakers, anti-inflammatory drugs, endothelin-A receptor antagonists, and vasopeptidase inhibitors. All of these have shown some effect in decreasing arterial stiffness. Nevertheless, further studies are needed which should address the influence of arterial stiffness diminishment on major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).

The cardiovascular system is regulated by hemodynamic and neurohumoral mechanisms. These regulatory systems play a key role in modulating cardiac function, vascular tone, and structure. Although neurohumoral systems are essential in vascular homeostasis, they become maladaptive in disease states such as hypertension, coronary disease, and heart failure. The clinical success of ACE inhibitors has led to efforts to block other humoral systems. Neutral endopeptidase (NEP) is an endothelial cell surface zinc metallopeptidase with similar structure and catalytic site. NEP is the major enzymatic pathway for degradation of natriuretic peptides, a secondary enzymatic pathway for degradation of kinins, and adrenomedullin. The natriuretic peptides can be viewed as endogenous inhibitors of the renin angiotensin system. Inhibition of NEP increases levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) of myocardial cell origin, and C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) of endothelial cell origin as well as bradykinin and adrenomedullin. By simultaneously inhibiting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and potentiating the natriuretic peptide and kinin systems, vasopeptidase inhibitors reduce vasoconstriction, enhance vasodilation, improve sodium/water balance, and, in turn, decrease peripheral vascular resistance and blood pressure and improve local blood flow. Within the blood vessel wall, this leads to a reduction of vasoconstrictor and proliferative mediators such as angiotensin II and increased local levels of bradykinin (and, in turn, nitric oxide) and natriuretic peptides. Preliminary clinical experiences with vasopeptidase inhibitors are encouraging. Thus, the combined inhibition of ACE and neutral endopeptidase is a new and promising approach to treat patients with hypertension, atherosclerosis, or heart failure.

There is now substantial evidence supporting a role of the natriuretic peptides as a major defence mechanism against excess salt and water retention and high blood pressure. Because of this there has been considerable interest in the therapeutic potential of the natriuretic peptide system. Several approaches have been explored including the use of native peptides, the development of natriuretic peptides mimetics and targetting of endogenous clearance of natriuretic peptides. While ANP and BNP administration may be valuable in some circumstances, however, the limitations of the use of peptides especially for long-term treatment are well apparent. In view of this, considerable effort has been devoted to the development of orally active agents to enhance endogenous natriuretic peptides through inhibition of breakdown by neutral endopeptidase. This research has now led to the vasopeptidase inhibitors - dual inhibitors of both endopeptidase and angiotensin converting enzyme. These agents clearly provide a novel approach to enhance endogenous natriuretic peptide function on a background of reduced angiotensin II activity and may lead to an important advance in the treatment of hypertension and of conditions associated with overt salt and water overload.

Vasopeptidase inhibitors, such as omapatrilat are single molecules that simultaneously inhibit neutral endopeptidase (NEP) and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE). In normotensive rats, a single dose of oral omapatrilat (10 mg/kg) and 1 mg/kg inhibited plasma ACE (P < .01) for 24 h and increased plasma renin activity for 8 h (P < .01). In vitro autoradiography using the specific NEP inhibitor radioligand 125I-RB104 and the specific ACE inhibitor radioligand 125I-MK351A showed omapatrilat (10 mg/kg) caused rapid and potent inhibition of renal NEP and ACE, respectively, for 24 h (P < .01). In spontaneously hypertensive rats, 10 days of oral omapatrilat (40 mg/kg/day) reduced blood pressure (vehicle 237 +/- 4 mm Hg; omapatrilat, 10 mg/kg, 212 +/- 4 mm Hg; omapatrilat 40 mg/kg, 197 +/- 4 mm Hg, P < .01) in a dose-dependent manner (10 v 40 mg/kg, P < .01). Left ventricular hypertrophy was significantly reduced by high-dose omapatrilat (vehicle 2.76 +/- 0.03 mg/g body weight; omapatrilat, 10 mg/kg, 2.71 +/- 0.02 mg/g; omapatrilat 40 mg/kg, 2.55 +/- 0.02 mg/g, P < .01) and omapatrilat also increased kidney weight compared to vehicle (both doses, P < .01). Omapatrilat caused significant inhibition of plasma ACE and increased plasma renin activity (both doses, P < .01), and in vitro autoradiographic studies indicated sustained inhibition of renal ACE and NEP (both doses, P < .01). Omapatrilat is a potent vasopeptidase inhibitor, and its antihypertensive effects are associated with inhibition of NEP and ACE at the tissue level and beneficial effects on cardiovascular structure. Relating the degree of tissue inhibition to physiologic responses may allow further definition of the role of local renin angiotensin and natriuretic peptide systems in the beneficial effects of vasopeptidase inhibitors.

Abstract —The antihypertensive agent omapatrilat represents a novel approach to antihypertensive therapy, namely vasopeptidase inhibition. Omapatrilat (BMS-186716) concomitantly inhibits neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin-converting enzyme, leading to protection from degradation of natriuretic and other hypotensive peptides in addition to interruption of the renin-angiotensin system. Although the potency of omapatrilat on reduction of blood pressure has been reported, its effects on resistance artery structure and function were unknown. We tested omapatrilat in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP), a malignant model of hypertension, with the hypothesis that it would improve the structure and endothelial function of mesenteric resistance arteries. Ten-week-old SHRSP were treated orally for 10 weeks with omapatrilat (40 mg/kg per day). Mesenteric arteries (lumen P −5 mol/L) but had no significant effect on endothelium-independent relaxation produced by a nitric oxide donor (sodium nitroprusside). This suggested that there existed endothelial dysfunction in SHRSP that was corrected by vasopeptidase inhibition, probably in part caused by the potent blood pressure–lowering effect of omapatrilat. Media width and media/lumen ratio were significantly decreased ( P P =0.07) to increase lumen diameter was observed. Vascular stiffness (slope of the elastic modulus versus stress curve) was unaltered by omapatrilat. In conclusion, omapatrilat, acting as a potent antihypertensive agent, may improve structure and endothelial function of resistance arteries in SHRSP, a severe form of genetic hypertension.

Hypertension remains uncontrolled worldwide despite the availability of several classes of antihypertensive agents. There is an increased risk of serious cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and renal events if the disease goes untreated or is poorly treated. Thus, the high incidence of hypertension coupled with its poor control make it imperative that more effective and well-tolerated treatments that exhibit target-organ protection be developed. Vasopeptidase inhibitors are a new class of cardiovascular agents that simultaneously inhibit neutral endopeptidase and angiotensin converting enzyme. They enhance peptides with vasodilatory and possibly organ-protective properties and also inhibit the production of the vasoconstrictor angiotensin II. In preclinical studies, omapatrilat has shown blood pressure-lowering effects independent of renin status and has increased survival in an animal model of congestive heart failure. Human studies with omapatrilat, the most clinically advanced vasopeptidase inhibitor, administered orally once daily have demonstrated powerful dose-dependent reduction of systolic and diastolic blood pressures, regardless of age, race, or gender. Omapatrilat is particularly effective in lowering systolic blood pressure; this article summarizes data from recent clinical trials. This drug is well tolerated, with adverse effects comparable to those of currently available antihypertensive agents. Omapatrilat and other vasopeptidase inhibitors have potential applications in the treatment of hypertension, heart failure, and other cardiac and vascular disorders.

The potential of bovine lactoferrin (LF) as a source of antihypertensive peptides acting on the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and the endothelin (ET) system as dual vasopeptidase inhibitors has been examined. For this purpose enzymatic LF hydrolyzates (LFHs) were generated by trypsin and proteinase K digestions. Permeate fractions with molecular masses lower than 3 kDa (LFH, This work was supported by grants AGL2007-64672/ALI and AGL2010-21009 from ‘Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia - FEDER’, Consolider Ingenio 2010, Fun-C-Food, CSD2007-00063, and RETICS RD06/0026/0006 from ‘Instituto de Salud Carlos III’. R. Fernández-Musoles is recipient of a fellowship from ‘Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia’ (BES-2008-004472).

Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) plays a pivotal role in modulation of vascular function and it is also involved in the pathophysiology of several cardiovascular diseases. We provide an updated overview of the current appraisal of ANP vascular effects in both animal models and humans. We describe the physiological implications of ANP vasomodulatory properties as well as the involvement of ANP, through its control of vascular function, in hypertension and heart failure. The principal molecular mechanisms underlying regulation of vascular tone, that is natriuretic peptide receptor type A/cyclic guanylate monophosphate, natriuretic peptide receptor type C, nitric oxide system, are discussed. We review the literature on therapeutic implications of ANP in hypertension and heart failure, examining the potential use of ANP analogues, neutral endopeptidase (NEP) inhibitors, ACE/NEP inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)/NEP inhibitors, the new dual endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE)/NEP inhibitors and ANP-based gene therapy. The data discussed support the role of ANP in different pathological conditions through its vasomodulatory properties. They also indicate that ANP may represent an optimal therapeutic agent in cardiovascular diseases.

Die Vasopeptidaseinhibition stellt eine neue medikamentöse Therapieoption dar. Dabei wird das Prinzip der klassischen ACE-Hemmung mit der Blockade der Neutralen Endopeptidase (NEP) kombiniert. Ziel der vorgelegten Arbeit war es, die Wirkung einer Vasopeptidase-Hemmung auf die linksventrikuläre Hypertrophie und Funktion am Modell der 5/6-nephrektomierten Ratte zu untersuchen. Wistar- Ratten wurden nach operativer 5/6-Nephrektomie über einen Zeitraum von 28 Tagen mit dem Vasopeptidaseinhibitor AVE 7688 (AVE: 30 mg/kg KG/d) oder dem AT1-Blocker Olmesartan (AT1B 10 mg/kg KG/d) behandelt. Diesen beiden Gruppen wurden 5/6-nephrektomierte, medikamentös unbehandelte Tiere (Nx) sowie gänzlich unbehandelte Tiere (Ko) als Kontrolle gegenübergestellt. Im Vergleich zur Kontrollgruppe (Ko) kam es zu einer deutlichen Abnahme der Kreatininclearance nach 5/6-Nephrektomie. Die AVE- und AT1B-Gruppe zeigte dabei keinen Anstieg der glomerulären Filtration (GFR). Es fand sich weiterhin ein deutlicher Anstieg des arteriellen Blutdrucks von durchschnittlich 24 mmHg +/- 6 zwischen den gesunden Kontrolltieren und den 5/6-nephrektomierten, medikamentös unbehandelten Tieren (Ko: 142 mmHg +/- 3 vs. Nx: 166 mmHg +/- 6; p, Vasopeptidase inhibitors represent a new pharmacological treatment option: they combine ACE inhibition and blockade of neutral endopeptidase (NEP). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of vasopeptidase inhibition regarding left ventricular hypertrophy and function in a rat model of 5/6 nephrectomy. After 5/6 nephrectomy Wistar rats were treated with the vasopeptidase inhibitor AVE 7688 (AVE: 30 mg/kgbw/d) or the AT1 blocker olmesartan (AT1B 10 mg/kgbw/d) over a period of 28 days. These two groups were compared to drug-untreated rats who either underwent 5/6 nephrectomy (Nx) or sham surgery (Co). Compared to the control group (Co), there was a significant decrease in creatinine clearance after 5/6 nephrectomy. The AVE and AT1B group showed no increase in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). There was an increase in arterial blood pressure of 24 mmHg +/- 6 when comparing drug-untreated animals with 5/6 nephrectomy to healthy control animals (Co: 142 mmHg +/- 3 vs. Nx: 166 mmHg +/- 6; p

This article describes in a sequential fashion how ab initio quantum mechanical methods can be applied to study the pharmacophoric features of drugs. It also describes how accurate drug–receptor interaction calculations can guide the careful design of balanced dual inhibitors, which form an important class of second generation drugs. As an example, the authors have chosen balanced inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme/neutral endopeptidase (ACE/NEP) as modern antihypertensive drugs. A unified, accurate, in silico design approach is presented, encompassing all steps from pharmacophore derivation to complete understanding of mechanistic aspects leading to drug design.

Background/Aims: Vasopeptidase inhibitors by definition inhibit both angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and neutral endopeptidase (NEP), therefore they may exceed the effect of ACE inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension. The present study investigated the effect of the vasopeptidase inhibitor AVE7688 in comparison to the ACE inhibitor ramipril on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and endothelial function in renovascular hypertension. Methods: Wistar-Kyoto rats with renovascular hypertension (two-kidney one-clamp-model) were randomized 2 weeks after unilateral clamping of the right renal artery for 3 weeks’ oral treatment with either AVE7688 (30 mg/kg/day), ramipril (1 mg/kg/day) or placebo. SBP was measured by the tail-cuff method and endothelium-dependent and -independent vascular function was assessed in isolated preconstricted (norepinephrine 10–7 mol/l) aortic rings as relaxation to acetylcholine (10–10–10–4 mol/l) and sodium nitroprusside (10–10–10–4 mol/l), respectively. Results: Two weeks after clamping, SBP was significantly elevated (196 ± 16 vs. 145 ± 8 mm Hg for sham-operated rats; p < 0.01) and further increased in placebo-treated animals to 208 ± 19 mm Hg. Treatment with AVE7688 and ramipril had a similar blood pressure-lowering effect (119 ± 8 and 124 ± 10 mm Hg, respectively; p < 0.01 vs. placebo). Maximum endothelium-dependent relaxation was reduced in hypertensive rats (72 ± 6 vs. 99 ± 7% in control rats; p < 0.05). Endothelium-dependent relaxation was restored by AVE7688 (101 ± 6%) and ramipril (94 ± 8%), respectively, whereas endothelium-independent relaxation was comparable in all groups. Conclusion: In renovascular hypertension the vasopeptidase inhibitor AVE7688 exhibited similar blood pressure-lowering and endothelial protective properties as compared to the ACE inhibitor ramipril. Therefore, in high renin models of hypertension, vasopeptidase inhibition may be considered an alternative treatment option to ACE inhibition.

Background CGS 35601 is a potent triple vasopeptidase inhibitor (VPI) of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), neutral endopeptidase (NEP), and endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE). The aim of the study was to determine the effects of this VPI on the hemodynamic profile of conscious, instrumented, unrestrained spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), in comparison to selective inhibitors of ACE and ACE + NEP, than +ECE combined. Circulating plasma concentrations of vasoactive mediators and reactive oxygen species were measured. Methods Old SHR male were instrumented (arterial catheter) and placed in a metabolic cage for daily hemodynamic measurements and blood samplings. Seven days after surgery, SHR received 1) saline vehicle; 2) increasing doses of the triple CGS 35601 (0.01, 0.1, 1, and 5 mg/kg/d, intra-arterially (i.a.) infusion for 5 d/dose) followed by a 5-day washout period; 3) benazepril (ACE inhibitor), ACE inhibitor + CGS 24592 (NEP inhibitor) and ACE inhibitor + NEP inhibitor + CGS 35066 (ECE inhibitor) (1 or 5 mg/kg/d i.a. infusion for 5 d/combination) followed by a 5-day washout period. Results The lowest dose of CGS 35601 had no effect. Doses at 0.1, 1, and 5 mg/kg/d reduced mean arterial blood pressure by 10%, 22%, and 40%, respectively. Heart rate was unaffected in all groups. CGS 35601 decreased concentrations of angiotensin II (Ang II), endothelin-1 (ET-1), and pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (proANP), and increased those of big ET-1, atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), bradykinin (BK), and hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) dose dependently. Conclusions The blood pressure-lowering effect of this triple VPI was superior to that of the other VPI in this preclinical rat model of hypertension. Further experiments are needed to assess triple VPI to other combinations in other models with regard to efficacy and angioedema. Only then it may constitute a first-in-class approach for the treatment of hypertension and other cardiovascular disorders.

We have shown earlier that cardiomyocyte apoptosis continues at a high level late after myocardial infarction and contributes to adverse cardiac remodeling. Here we studied whether this process can be inhibited by the vasopeptidase inhibitor omapatrilat, a drug which causes simultaneous inhibition of both angiotensin converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase. Our hypothesis was that omapatrilat-treated rats would have less cardiomyocyte apoptosis, and less adverse cardiac remodeling compared to rats treated with selective inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme, neutral endopeptidase or placebo. Myocardial infarction was produced by ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Rats were randomized to receive omapatrilat, captopril, neutral endopeptidase inhibitor SQ-28603 or vehicle. Rats treated with omapatrilat and captopril had reduced cardiac BNP mRNA levels and less myocardial fibrosis by comparison with the vehicle-treated rats. However, omapatrilat was more effective than captopril in attenuating hypertrophy as measured by relative cardiac weight (3.0+/-0.2 vs. 3.8+/-0.2 mg/g, P0.01) or by echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass (0.61+/-0.05 vs. 0.83+/-0.06 g, P0.01). Myocardial apoptosis was elevated both in the infarction border zone (0.129+/-0.017%) and in the remote area (0.035+/-0.005%) still 4 weeks after myocardial infarction. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition proved to be important in the prevention of apoptosis since both omapatrilat and captopril reduced the number of apoptotic myocytes whereas selective neutral endopeptidase inhibitor SQ-28603 had no effect. In conclusion, myocardial apoptosis, remaining increased 4 weeks after myocardial infarction, was reduced by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition. Vasopeptidase inhibition was more effective than selective angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in preventing adverse cardiac remodeling after myocardial infarction.

The natriuretic peptides are a family of vasoactive peptides with many favourable physiological properties. In recent years the peptides have emerged as important candidates for the development of diagnostic tools and therapeutic agents in cardiovascular disease. Natriuretic peptides play a key role in the regulation of salt and water balance, cell growth, as well as blood pressure homeostasis. They are one of the body’s major defence mechanisms against excessive salt and water retention, and high blood pressure. In particular, atrial natriuretic peptides are involved in the pathophysiology of hypertension and heart failure. Several therapeutic approaches are under development to augment the biological actions of the system. Vasopeptidase inhibitors, which inhibit the breakdown of natriuretic peptides by neutral endopeptidase, are a promising therapeutic tool in the treatment of patients with cardiovascular conditions such as hypertension and congestive heart failure. This paper summarises the pathophysiological aspects of the natriuretic family of peptides in major cardiovascular conditions and looks at the latest therapeutic use of drugs that increase natriuretic peptides levels.