Search

Objective: To analyze whether the use of a hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium (HETM) increases rates of implantation (IRs) and clinical pregnancy (CPRs), compared with the use of a conventional transfer medium after day 3 and day 5 embryo transfers. Design: Prospective randomized controlled trial. Setting: An assisted reproduction program in a private tertiary-care hospital in Turkey. Patient(s): A total of 1,282 consecutive fresh embryo transfer cycles (825 day 3 and 457 day 5) were randomly allocated into two groups. In 639 women, ET was effected with HETM, and in 643, it was effected with a conventional embryo transfer medium. Intervention(s): Embryo transfer using HETM or conventional embryo transfer medium. Main Outcome Measure(s): Clinical pregnancy rates and IRs were compared with regard to day of embryo transfer, women''s age, quality of the transferred embryos, and presence of previous implantation failures. Result(s): Overall CPRs and IRs significantly increased with the use of HETM (CPR: 54.6% vs. 48.5%, odds ratio: 1.28, 95% confidence interval: 1.03–1.59; IR: 32% vs. 25%, odds ratio: 1.43, 95% confidence interval: 1.23–1.66, for HETM and control groups, respectively). The number needed to treat (NNT) for one additional pregnancy with routine use of HETM was 17. The beneficial effect was more prominent in women who were >35 years of age (NNT = 7), in women who had previous failed cycles (NNT = 7), and in women who had poor-quality embryos (NNT = 8). Conclusion(s): The enrichment of transfer medium with hyaluronan increases CPRs and IRs, both for day 3 and day 5 embryo transfers. The beneficial effect was most evident in women who were >35 years of age, in women who had only poor-quality embryos available for transfer, and in women who had previous implantation failures. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: To compare the clinical outcome of single-embryo transfer (SET) with double-embryo transfer (DET) in in vitro maturation (IVM) cycles performed in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and to determine which factors predict those outcomes.Design: A retrospective analysis.Setting: Private assisted reproduction center.Patient(s): One hundred and fifty-nine women with PCOS.Intervention(s): In vitro maturation with elective SET or DET conducted between September 2007 and May 2014.Main Outcome Measure(s): Live-birth rates.Result(s): Single-embryo transfer was performed in 83 patients (52.2%), and DET was performed in 76 patients (47.7%). When compared with the patients who had DET, the patients who had SET were statistically significantly younger (32.4 ± 3.5 vs. 24.1 ± 4.2 years) and had a shorter infertility duration (9.2 ± 4.5 vs. 4.4 ± 2.1 years), fewer previous ART cycles (<2 prior attempts, 39.5% vs. 6%; ≥2 prior attempts, 60.5% vs. 0), fewer collected oocytes (15.1 ± 4.6 vs. 12.6 ± 3.8), fewer metaphase II oocytes (9.0 ± 4.1 vs. 5.7 ± 2.9), fewer fertilized oocytes (8.2 ± 3.7 vs. 3.6 ± 2.3), and a higher implantation rate (27% vs. 47%). The SET and DET groups had similar embryo quality and similar clinical pregnancy (44.6% vs. 44.7%) and live-birth rates (34.9% vs. 34.2%). Twin pregnancy rates were statistically significantly higher in the DET compared with the SET groups (9.2% vs. 2.4%).Conclusion(s): In vitro maturation is a successful assisted reproduction technique that can be an alternative to conventional in vitro fertilization in women presenting with PCOS-related infertility. Our observations suggest that SET is a feasible option to prevent multiple pregnancies while maintaining the live-birth rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare two commonly used protocols (fresh vs. vitrified) used to transfer euploid blastocysts after IVF with preimplantation genetic screening.Design: Randomized controlled trial.Setting: Private assisted reproduction center.Patient(s): A total of 179 patients undergoing IVF treatment using preimplantation genetic screening.Intervention(s): Patients were randomized at the time of hCG administration to either a freeze-all cycle or a fresh day 6 ET during the stimulated cycle.Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation rates (sac/embryo transferred), ongoing pregnancy rates (PRs) (beyond 8 weeks), and live birth rate per ET in the primary transfer cycle.Result(s): Implantation rate per embryo transferred showed an improvement in the frozen group compared with the fresh group, but not significantly (75% vs. 67%). The ongoing PR (80% vs. 61%) and live birth rates (77% vs. 59%) were significantly higher in the frozen group compared with the fresh group.Conclusion(s): Either treatment protocol investigated in the present study can be a reasonable option for patients. Freezing all embryos allows for inclusion of all blastocysts in the cohort of embryos available for transfer, which also results in a higher proportion of patients reaching ET. These findings suggest a trend toward favoring the freeze-all option as a preferred transfer strategy when using known euploid embryos.Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT02000349. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]