Search

Phosphoproteomics is a promising tool for identifying biomarkers of treatment response in cancer. Here, the authors analyse proteomics profiling of HER2-negative female breast cancer patients and identify potential predictors of paclitaxel response.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer might be as effective as chemotherapy, with a better toxicity profile. Blocking a crucial process such as angiogenesis with sunitinib may have a synergistic effect with NET. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant sunitinib plus exemestane in early-stage HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer. In this phase I/II study, postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- stage II-III breast cancer received neoadjuvant exemestane at conventional dose of 25mg plus sunitinib in a 3 + 3 design at 25mg (3/1weeks scheme) or 37.5mg continuous dose, for 6 months. Coprimary endpoints were the recommended dose of sunitinib combined with exemestane and objective response. Secondary endpoints included safety and biomarkers of early response. For 15 months, 18 patients were enrolled, 15 at sunitinib 25mg and 3 at 37.5mg. Median age was 73, 77% of patients had T2 tumors and 67% node-positive disease. The most common grade 2 toxicity was asthenia (44%), as was hypertension (22%) for grade 3. No grade 4-5 were reported. Twelve patients (66%) achieved an objective response. VEGFR-2 levels significantly decreased after one month of treatment. Differential gene expression analysis showed downregulation of ESR1, PGR and NAT1 in post-treatment samples and upregulation of EGFR, MYC, SFRP1, and FOXC1. PAM50 analysis on 83% of patients showed a prevalence of luminal A subtype, both in pre-treatment (63.6%) and post-treatment tumors (54.5%). Sunitinib plus exemestane was associated with substantial yet reversible toxicities, providing safety, efficacy and biological impact insights of combining an antiangiogenic drug with hormone therapy in early-stage breast cancer.Trial registration: Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00931450. 02/07/2009., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The effect of the addition of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy in terms of molecular downstaging remains undetermined. Switching from a high-risk to a low risk Recurrence Score (RS) group could provide useful information to identify patients who might not require chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to assess the biological and clinical activity of letrozole plus palbociclib as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer with an initial Oncotype DX RS ≥18., Patients and Methods: Participants were women aged ≥18 years with HR-positive/HER2-negative, Ki67 ≥ 20%, stage II-IIIB early breast cancer with a baseline RS ≥18. Eligible patients with a pretreatment RS 18-25 (cohort A) and 26-100 (cohort B) received six 28-day cycles of letrozole (2.5 mg per day; plus goserelin if pre- or perimenopausal) plus palbociclib (125 mg per day; 3/1 schedule) before surgery. The primary endpoint for both cohorts was the proportion of patients who achieved an RS ≤25 at surgery or a pathological complete response (pCR)., Results: A total of 67 patients were enrolled, among which 65 were assessable for the primary endpoint (32 patients in cohort A and 33 in cohort B). At surgery, 22 (68.8%) patients in cohort A and 18 (54.5%) patients in cohort B had an RS ≤25 or a pCR [only 1 (3.0%) patient in cohort B], meeting the primary endpoint in cohort B (P < 0.01), but not in cohort A (P = 0.98). No new safety signals were identified., Conclusions: The efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment with letrozole plus palbociclib does not seem to depend on pretreatment RS for patients with RS ≥18. However, around half of patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer with an RS 26-100 at baseline achieved molecular downstaging with this regimen., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction : Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer offers the possibility to facilitate breast and axillary surgery; it is a test of chemosensibility in vivo with significant prognostic value and may be used to tailor adjuvant treatment according to the response. Material and Methods : A retrospective single-institution cohort of 482 stage II and III breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on anthracycline and taxans, plus antiHEr2 in Her2-positive cases, was studied. Survival was calculated at 5 and 10 years. Kaplan-Meier curves with a log-rank test were calculated for differences according to age, BRCA status, menopausal status, TNM, pathological and molecular surrogate subtype, 20% TIL cut-off, surgical procedure, response to chemotherapy and the presence of vascular invasion. Results : The pCR rate was 25.3% and was greater in HER2 (51.3%) and TNBC (31.7%) and in BRCA carriers (41.9%). The factors independently related to patient survival were pathology and molecular surrogate subtype, type of surgery, response to NACT and vascular invasion. BRCA status was a protective prognostic factor without reaching statistical significance, with an HR 0.5 (95%CI 0.1-1.4). Mastectomy presented a double risk of distant recurrence compared to breast-conservative surgery (BCS), supporting BCS as a safe option after NACT. After a mean follow-up of 126 (SD 43) months, luminal tumors presented a substantial difference in survival rates calculated at 5 or 10 years (81.2% compared to 74.7%), whereas that for TNBC was 75.3 and 73.5, respectively. The greatest difference was seen according to the response in patients with pCR, who exhibited a 10 years DDFS of 95.5% vs. 72.4% for those patients without pCR, p < 0001. This difference was especially meaningful in TNBC: the 10 years DDFS according to an RCB of 0 to 3 was 100%, 80.6%, 69% and 49.2%, respectively, p < 0001. Patients with a particularly poor prognosis were those with lobular carcinomas, with a 10 years DDFS of 42.9% vs. 79.7% for ductal carcinomas, p = 0.001, and patients with vascular invasion at the surgical specimen, with a 10 years DDFS of 59.2% vs. 83.6% for those patients without vascular invasion, p < 0.001. Remarkably, BRCA carriers presented a longer survival, with an estimated 10 years DDFS of 89.6% vs. 77.2% for non-carriers, p = 0.054. Conclusions : Long-term outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy can help patients and clinicians make well-informed decisions.

In this study, we performed genomic analyses of cell cycle and tumor microenvironment changes during and after ribociclib and letrozole or chemotherapy in the CORALLEEN trial. 106 women with untreated PAM50-defined Luminal B early breast cancers were randomly assigned to receive neoadjuvant ribociclib and letrozole or standard-of-care chemotherapy. Ki67 immunohistochemistry, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes quantification, and RNA sequencing were obtained from tissue biopsies pre-treatment, on day 14 of treatment, and tumor specimens from surgical resection. Results showed that at surgery, Ki67 and the PAM50 proliferation scores were lower after ribociclib compared to chemotherapy. However, consistent reactivation of tumor cell proliferation from day 14 to surgery was only observed in the ribociclib arm. In tumors with complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA) at surgery, PAM50 proliferation scores were lower in the ribociclib arm compared to chemotherapy (p < 0.001), whereas the opposite was observed with tumor cellularity (p = 0.002). Gene expression signatures (GES) associated with antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and innate immune system activity showed increased expression post-chemotherapy but decreased expression post-ribociclib. Interferon-associated GES had decreased expression with CCCA and increased expression with non-CCCA. Our findings suggest that while both treatment strategies decreased proliferation, the depth and the patterns over time differed by treatment arm. Immunologically, ribociclib was associated with downregulated GES associated with APCs and the innate immune system in Luminal B tumors, contrary to existing preclinical data. Further studies are needed to understand the effect of CDK4/6 inhibition on the tumor cells and microenvironment, an effect which may vary according to tumor subtypes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Prognostic and predictive biomarkers to cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors are lacking. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be used to profile these patients and dynamic changes in ctDNA could be an early predictor of treatment efficacy. Here, we conducted plasma ctDNA profiling in patients from the PEARL trial comparing palbociclib+fulvestrant versus capecitabine to investigate associations between baseline genomic landscape and on-treatment ctDNA dynamics with treatment efficacy., Experimental Design: Correlative blood samples were collected at baseline [cycle 1-day 1 (C1D1)] and prior to treatment [cycle 1-day 15 (C1D15)]. Plasma ctDNA was sequenced with a custom error-corrected capture panel, with both univariate and multivariate Cox models used for treatment efficacy associations. A prespecified methodology measuring ctDNA changes in clonal mutations between C1D1 and C1D15 was used for the on-treatment ctDNA dynamic model., Results: 201 patients were profiled at baseline, with ctDNA detection associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS). Detectable TP53 mutation showed worse PFS and OS in both treatment arms, even after restricting population to baseline ctDNA detection. ESR1 mutations were associated with worse OS overall, which was lost when restricting population to baseline ctDNA detection. PIK3CA mutations confer worse OS only to patients on the palbociclib+fulvestrant treatment arm. ctDNA dynamics analysis (n = 120) showed higher ctDNA suppression in the capecitabine arm. Patients without ctDNA suppression showed worse PFS in both treatment arms., Conclusions: We show impaired survival irrespective of endocrine or chemotherapy-based treatments for patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer harboring plasma TP53 mutations. Early ctDNA suppression may provide treatment efficacy predictions. Further validation to fully demonstrate clinical utility of ctDNA dynamics is warranted., (©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Introduction: Breast cancer surgery currently focuses on de-escalating treatment without compromising patient survival. Axillary radiotherapy (ART) now replaces axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with limited sentinel lymph node (SLN) involvement during the primary surgery, and this has significantly reduced the incidence of lymphedema without worsening the prognosis. However, patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) cannot benefit from this option despite the low incidence of residual disease in the armpit in most cases. Data regarding the use of radiotherapy instead of ALND in this population are lacking. This study will assess whether ART is non-inferior to ALND in terms of recurrence and overall survival in patients with positive SLN after NST, including whether it reduces surgery-related adverse effects., Methods and Analyses: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial will enroll 1660 patients with breast cancer and positive SLNs following NST in approximately 50 Spanish centers over 3 years. Patients will be stratified by NST regimen and nodal involvement (isolated tumoral cells or micrometastasis versus macrometastasis) and randomly assigned 1:1 to ART without ALND (study arm) or ALND alone (control arm). Level 3 and supraclavicular radiotherapy will be added in both arms. The primary outcome is the 5-year axillary recurrence determined by clinical and radiological examination. The secondary outcomes include lymphedema or arm dysfunction, quality of life based (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires), disease-free survival, and overall survival., Discussion: This study aims to provide data to confirm the efficacy and safety of ART over ALND in patients with a positive SLN after NST, together with the impact on morbidity., Ethics and Dissemination: The Research Ethics Committee of Bellvitge University Hospital approved this trial (Protocol Record PR148/21, version 3, 1/2/2022) and all patients must provide written informed consent. The involvement of around 50 centers across Spain will facilitate the dissemination of our results., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier number NCT04889924., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Garcia-Tejedor, Ortega-Exposito, Salinas, Luzardo-González, Falo, Martinez-Pérez, Pérez-Montero, Soler-Monsó, Bajen, Benitez, Ortega, Petit, Guma, Campos, Plà, Pernas, Peñafiel, Yeste, Gil-Gil, Guedea, Ponce and Laplana.)

Purpose: In hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC), it is imperative to identify patients who respond poorly to cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and to discover therapeutic targets to reverse this resistance. Non-luminal breast cancer subtype and high levels of CCNE1 are candidate biomarkers in this setting, but further validation is needed., Experimental Design: We performed mRNA gene expression profiling and correlation with progression-free survival (PFS) on 455 tumor samples included in the phase III PEARL study, which assigned patients with HR+/HER2- MBC to receive palbociclib+endocrine therapy (ET) versus capecitabine. Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2- breast cancer cell lines were used to generate and characterize resistance to palbociclib+ET., Results: Non-luminal subtype was more prevalent in metastatic (14%) than in primary tumor samples (4%). Patients with non-luminal tumors had median PFS of 2.4 months with palbociclib+ET and 9.3 months with capecitabine; HR 4.16, adjusted P value < 0.0001. Tumors with high CCNE1 expression (above median) also had worse median PFS with palbociclib+ET (6.2 months) than with capecitabine (9.3 months); HR 1.55, adjusted P value = 0.0036. In patients refractory to palbociclib+ET (PFS in the lower quartile), we found higher levels of Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1). In an independent data set (PALOMA3), tumors with high PLK1 show worse median PFS than those with low PLK1 expression under palbociclib+ET treatment. In ER+/HER2- cell line models, we show that PLK1 inhibition reverses resistance to palbociclib+ET., Conclusions: We confirm the association of non-luminal subtype and CCNE1 with resistance to CDK4/6i+ET in HR+ MBC. High levels of PLK1 mRNA identify patients with poor response to palbociclib, suggesting PLK1 could also play a role in the setting of resistance to CDK4/6i., (©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and exploratory biomarkers of continuing palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) beyond progression on prior palbociclib-based regimen in patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC)., Patients and Methods: The multicenter, open-label, phase II BioPER trial included women who had experienced a progressive disease (PD) after having achieved clinical benefit on the immediately prior palbociclib plus ET regimen. Palbociclib (125 mg, 100 mg, or 75 mg daily orally for 3 weeks and 1 week off as per prior palbociclib-based regimen) plus ET of physician's choice were administered in 4-week cycles until PD or unacceptable toxicity. Coprimary endpoints were clinical benefit rate (CBR) and percentage of tumors with baseline loss of retinoblastoma (Rb) protein expression. Additional endpoints included safety and biomarker analysis., Results: Among 33 patients enrolled, CBR was 34.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.6-53.2; P < 0.001] and 13.0% of tumors (95% CI, 5.2-27.5) showed loss of Rb protein expression, meeting both coprimary endpoints. Median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (95% CI, 1.8-6.7). No new safety signals were reported. A signature that included baseline mediators of therapeutic resistance to palbociclib and ET (low Rb score, high cyclin E1 score, ESR1 mutation) was independently associated with shorter median progression-free survival (HR, 22.0; 95% CI, 1.71-282.9; P = 0.018)., Conclusions: Maintaining palbociclib after progression on prior palbociclib-based regimen seems to be a reasonable, investigational approach for selected patients. A composite biomarker signature predicts a subset of patients who may not derive a greater benefit from palbociclib rechallenge, warranting further validation in larger randomized controlled trials., (©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Precision oncology research is challenging outside the contexts of oncogenic addiction and/or targeted therapies. We previously showed that phosphoproteomics is a powerful approach to reveal patient subsets of interest characterized by the activity of a few kinases where the underlying genomics is complex. Here, we conduct a phosphoproteomic screening of samples from HER2-negative female breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant paclitaxel (N = 130), aiming to find candidate biomarkers of paclitaxel sensitivity. Filtering 11 candidate biomarkers through 2 independent patient sets (N = 218) allowed the identification of a subgroup of patients characterized by high levels of CDK4 and filamin-A who had a 90% chance of achieving a pCR in response to paclitaxel. Mechanistically, CDK4 regulates filamin-A transcription, which in turn forms a complex with tubulin and CLIP-170, which elicits increased binding of paclitaxel to microtubules, microtubule acetylation and stabilization, and mitotic catastrophe. Thus, phosphoproteomics allows the identification of explainable factors for predicting response to paclitaxel., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Metaplastic breast carcinomas are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumors (0.5-2%). They are mainly triple negative tumors but they present poorer chemotherapy responses and worse prognosis than other triple negative tumors. The aim of our study was to characterize the molecular profile and tumor evolution in matched (primary-relapse) tumor samples from patients with early-stage metaplastic breast carcinomas who had disease recurrence/progression. We performed genomic profiling of tumor biopsies at least from two different time points of their tumor evolution. Tumor samples were analyzed by DNA-Next Generation Sequencing (Illumina 2 x 75bp) using the Action OncoKitDX panel (Imegen-Health in Code group), which includes point mutations in 50 genes, CNVs, and fusion genes. Only pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were considered for analysis and they were categorized following the ComPerMed criteria. We analyzed 21 matched tumor samples (8 primary and 13 relapse/progression samples). Genomic profiling of matched tumor samples revealed that mutations present in primary tumors are generally maintained in the relapse/disease progression. We did not find a significant increase in point mutations between primary and relapse/progression samples, although gene amplifications were found more frequently in relapse/progression samples. Tumor samples harbored high frequency of TP53 (100%) and TERT promoter (29%) mutations, and of MYC amplifications (80% of which in relapse/progression samples). No PI3KCA mutations were found, but PTEN variations were enriched in 38% of samples (10% mutations and 28% deletions). FGFR1 amplifications were identified in 13% of samples (primary tumor only). Neither ERBB2 nor EGFR gene amplifications were detected. The most frequent pathogenic alterations occurred in cycle regulation's genes, including TP53 and TERT promoter mutations, and MYC amplifications. Relapse/progression samples were highly enriched for MYC amplification. Larger studies are required to better characterize these tumors, and identify new strategies to improve the prognosis of these patients., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology.)

Background: Carcinomatous meningitis (CM) is a severe complication of breast cancer. The Breast International Group (BIG) carried out a survey to describe the approach to CM internationally., Patients and Methods: A questionnaire on the management of CM was developed by the Brain Metastases Task Force of BIG and distributed to its groups, requesting one answer per group site., Results: A total of 241 sites responded, 119 from Europe, 9 from North America, 39 from Central/South America, 58 from Asia, and 16 in Australia/New Zealand, with 24.5% being general hospitals with oncology units, 44.4% university hospitals, 22.4% oncology centers, and 8.7% private hospitals. About 56.0% of sites reported seeing <5 cases annually with 60.6% reporting no increase in the number of cases of CM recently. Nearly 63.1% of sites investigate for CM when a patient has symptoms or radiological evidence, while 33.2% investigate only for symptoms. For diagnosis, 71.8% of sites required a positive cerebrospinal fluid cytology, while magnetic resonance imaging findings were sufficient in 23.7% of sites. Roughly 97.1% of sites treat CM and 51.9% also refer patients to palliative care. Intrathecal therapy is used in 41.9% of sites, mainly with methotrexate (74.3%). As many as 20 centers have a national registry for patients with breast cancer with central nervous system metastases and of those 5 have one for CM. Most (90.9%) centers would be interested in participating in a registry as well as in studies for CM, the latter preferably (62.1%) breast cancer subtype specific., Conclusions: This is the first study to map out the approach to CM from breast cancer globally. Although guidelines with level 1 evidence are lacking, there is a high degree of homogeneity in the approach to CM globally and great interest for conducting studies in this area., Competing Interests: Disclosure ER reports consulting or advisory role for AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Pfizer; research funding from Novartis, Demo Pharmaceutical, Celldex, Radius Health, Tesaro, Parexel, and AnaBIOsis Pharmaceuticals; travel funding from Sanofi, Ipsen, Genesis Pharmaceuticals, LEO Pharma, Merck, Roche, and GENEKOR. CP reports grant funding from Pfizer and Daiichi Sankyo; honoraria from Pfizer, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Exact sciences, Gilead, Seagen, and Eli Lilly. VM reports honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Pfizer, Seagen, Novartis, Roche, Teva, Janssen-Cilag, and Gilead; playing an advisory role for Hexal, Roche, Pfizer, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Nektar, Seagen, Gilead, and Eisai; research funding from Roche, Novartis, Seagen, Pfizer, and Genentech. RB reports advisory role for Astra-Zeneca, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, Puma, Roche, and Seagen; lecture honoraria from Astra-Zeneca, Daiichi, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, Roche, and Seagen; research support from Daiichi, MSD, Novartis, and Roche. GR reports research funding (institution) from AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Tesaro, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, Biovica, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi/Aventis; and patents, royalties, other intellectual property from Agendia for MammaPrint due to the collaboration on the conduct of the MINDACT trial (Institution). SPG reports honoraria from Novartis, Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, and Seagen; advisory/consultancy roles with Novartis, Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Lilly, and Seagen; research grant from Roche; travel/accommodation/expenses from Roche, Amgen, Shire, Novartis, Pfizer, Bayer, Celgene, and Daiichi Sankyo. HCK reports honoraria and travel support from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Tesaro, MSD, Onkowissen, Eli Lilly, SurgVision, Exact Sciences, and Genomic Health; and Stock ownership from Theraclion and Phaon scientific. NZ is on the advisory board for Lilly, Eisai, and AstraZeneca; reports receiving honorarium from Roche, Pfizer, Eisai, and Amgen; research funding (institutional) from Pfizer, Roche, and GSK; education funding from Roche, Novartis, and Amgen (none considered relevant to the current work). MP is on the advisory boards, and has participated in educational programs and conferences for Pfizer, BMS, Novartis, Astellas, Janssen, MD Serono, Merck, Amgen, and Sanofi; reports research funding (institutional) from Astellas, Novartis, Roche, Merck, BMS, Sanofi, and AstraZeneca. RMC has received (to institution) an unrestricted educational grant from Pfizer; and research funds from MSD Ireland and Pfizer. HT reports employment or management position with Partner and Medical Director Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt; honoraria from Novartis, Roche, GSK, Seagen, Pfizer, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Daiichi, and Exact Science; consulting activities for Novartis, Roche, GSK, Seagen, Pfizer, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Daiichi, and Exact Science. AM reports advisory/consultant role, honoraria, and research grant from Lilly and Roche; advisory/consultant role for Novartis, Merck, Seagen, and Daiichi-Sankyo. LDM reports grants from Eli Lilly during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Eli Lilly, Novartis, MSD, Genomic Health, Pierre Fabre, Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Seagen, Ipsen, and Gilead; personal fees and nonfinancial support from Roche, Pfizer, and Eisai, outside the submitted work. CC reports honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Genesis, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche. SO reports lecture fees, honoraria, or other fees paid by a single company or for-profit organization for the time or labor of a researcher engaged for conference attendance from Chugai, Lilly, AstraZeneca, and Pfizer. IM reports performing consultancy roles for AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, In3Bio, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche; travel/conference registration activities for Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead, and Novartis. ME serves on the advisory boards of Pfizer and Novartis; lecturing for Astra Zeneca (institution), but has no conflicts of interest related to this publication. KZ serves on the advisory board or performs talk for AstraZeneca, Daiichi, Exact Sciences, Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen, and Viatris/Mylan; unrestricted funding for organization of academic symposium from Agendia, AstraZeneca-MSD, Daiichi, Eisai, Exact Sciences, Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seagen, Viatris/Mylan, and Vifor; support for participation in international congress from AstraZeneca, Daiichi, Pierre Fabre, and Roche; is a member of steering committee of Eleanor study (Pierre Fabre); and research funding from Roche. MV reports honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, and Daiichi; consulting or advisory role for Novartis and Roche; travel funds from Roche and Pfizer. DF’s institution receives support from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Servier, Tesaro, Sanofi, and Pfizer for the conduct of clinical trials outside the submitted work. MG-G reports honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Roche, Novartis, and Pierre Fabre; travel/attending meetings for Pfizer, Roche, and Novartis; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca. BL reports consulting or advisory role for AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Merck, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre, and Daiichi Sankyo. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: MET-signaling and midkine (ALK ligand) promote glioma cell maintenance and resistance against anticancer therapies. ALK and c-MET inhibition with crizotinib have a preclinical therapeutic rationale to be tested in newly diagnosed GBM., Methods: Eligible patients received crizotinib with standard radiotherapy (RT)/temozolomide (TMZ) followed by maintenance with crizotinib. The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in a 3 + 3 dose escalation (DE) strategy and safety evaluation in the expansion cohort (EC). Secondary objectives included progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and exploratory biomarker analysis., Results: The study enrolled 38 patients. The median age was 52 years (33-76), 44% were male, 44% were MGMT methylated, and three patients had IDH1/2 mutation. In DE, DLTs were reported in 1/6 in the second cohort (250 mg/QD), declaring 250 mg/QD of crizotinib as the RP2D for the EC. In the EC, 9/25 patients (32%) presented grade ≥3 adverse events. The median follow up was 18.7 months (m) and the median PFS was 10.7 m (95% CI, 7.7-13.8), with a 6 m PFS and 12 m PFS of 71.5% and 38.8%, respectively. At the time of this analysis, 1 died without progression and 24 had progressed. The median OS was 22.6 m (95% CI, 14.1-31.1) with a 24 m OS of 44.5%. Molecular biomarkers showed no correlation with efficacy., Conclusions: The addition of crizotinib to standard RT and TMZ for newly diagnosed GBM was safe and the efficacy was encouraging, warranting prospective validation in an adequately powered, randomized controlled study.

The use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) has proven to be a successful strategy in the treatment of advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR + ) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2 - ) breast cancer (BC), leading to a strong interest in their possible role in the treatment of early luminal BC. In this review we collect the most relevant and recent information on the use of CDK4/6i for the treatment of early BC in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Specifically, we evaluate the results of the large phase 3 adjuvant trials recently released, which have yielded apparently divergent results. We also examine the relevance of biomarkers as response predictive factors for CDI4/6i, the combination between radiotherapy and CDK4/6i, and provide a critical discussion on the evidence that we have so far and future directions of the role of these drugs in the treatment of early BC., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest MGG reports consulting fees and honoraria from Pfizer, Agendia, and Kern; advisory roles for AstraZeneca and Daiichi-Sankyo; travel grants from Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, and Kern. EA reports advisory roles for Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, BMS, AstraZeneca, Genomic Health, and Nanostring; travel grants from Celgene; research grants from Roche, Pfizer, Sysmex, MSD, and Nanostring. JG reports consulting fees and honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Daiichi-Sankyo; advisory roles for Novartis, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and AstraZeneca. JdlH-R reports consulting fees and honoraria from Pfizer, Novartis, and Agendia; advisory roles for AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, Novartis and Roche; travel grants from Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, Roche and Novartis. EC reports consulting fees from Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Roche, Novartis, AstraZeneca and MSD; participating as a speaker for Roche, Pfizer and Eli Lilly; travel grants from Roche and Pfizer. PT reports personal fees from AstraZeneca and honoraria for participation in advisory boards from Amgen, AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche, Pfizer and Eisai. DC is an employee of and may own stock in Pfizer Inc. AL-C reports owing stock, patents and intellectual property with MedSIR; consultant for AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sanyo, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Eli Lilly; research funding from Eisai, Daiichi-Sanyo, Roche, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, MSD, Genomic-Health, Agendia and Pierre Fabre; travel grants from Roche, Pfizer and Eli Lilly; providing expert testimony for AstraZeneca., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) is the standard treatment of hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, its efficacy has not been compared with that of chemotherapy in a phase III trial., Patients and Methods: PEARL is a multicentre, phase III randomised study in which patients with aromatase inhibitor (AI)-resistant MBC were included in two consecutive cohorts. In cohort 1, patients were randomised 1 : 1 to palbociclib plus exemestane or capecitabine. On discovering new evidence about estrogen receptor-1 (ESR1) mutations inducing resistance to AIs, the trial was amended to include cohort 2, in which patients were randomised 1 : 1 between palbociclib plus fulvestrant and capecitabine. The stratification criteria were disease site, prior sensitivity to ET, prior chemotherapy for MBC, and country of origin. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) in cohort 2 and in wild-type ESR1 patients (cohort 1 + cohort 2). ESR1 hotspot mutations were analysed in baseline circulating tumour DNA., Results: From March 2014 to July 2018, 296 and 305 patients were included in cohort 1 and cohort 2, respectively. Palbociclib plus ET was not superior to capecitabine in both cohort 2 [median PFS: 7.5 versus 10.0 months; adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85-1.50] and wild-type ESR1 patients (median PFS: 8.0 versus 10.6 months; aHR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.87-1.41). The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities with palbociclib plus exemestane, palbociclib plus fulvestrant and capecitabine, respectively, were neutropenia (57.4%, 55.7% and 5.5%), hand/foot syndrome (0%, 0% and 23.5%), and diarrhoea (1.3%, 1.3% and 7.6%). Palbociclib plus ET offered better quality of life (aHR for time to deterioration of global health status: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.53-0.85)., Conclusions: There was no statistical superiority of palbociclib plus ET over capecitabine with respect to PFS in MBC patients resistant to AIs. Palbociclib plus ET showed a better safety profile and improved quality of life., Competing Interests: Disclosure MM has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Taiho Oncology, Roche/Genentech, Novartis, PharmaMar, Eli Lilly, PUMA, Taiho Oncology, and Pfizer; speakers' honoraria from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Roche/Genentech, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Pfizer; contracted research fees from Roche, Novartis, and PUMA. CZ has received consulting fees and speaker’s honoraria from Roche, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Imugene, Ariad, Pfizer, Merrimack, Merck KGaA, Fibrogen, AstraZeneca, Tesaro, Gilead, Servier, Shire, Eli Lilly, and Athenex. His institution, Central European Cancer Center, Wiener Privatklinik Hospital, has received fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Merck KGaA. MRB has received speaker fees and advisory grants from Pfizer, Novartis, and Lilly. EC, who has a stock and other ownership interests from Lilly, has received travel and accommodation support from Roche, and her husband who has participated in consulting and advisory board activities with Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Celgene, Roche Pharma, Janssen, Amgen, Incyte, Abbvie, and Pfizer, has received travel and accommodation support from Celgene, Novartis, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. His institution has received research funding from Celgene, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Celgene, Roche/Genentech, Amgen, Pfizer, and Abbvie. GEICAM has received research funding from Roche/Genentech, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pierre Fabre, and Takeda. NT has received advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Bicycle Therapeutics, Taiho, Zeno Pharmaceuticals, and Repare Therapeutics and research funding from AstraZeneca, Bio-Rad, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Clovis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Guardant Health. MM has received travel and congress assistance support from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, and Eisai. BB has received advisory board honoraria from Genentech, Novartis, Merck Sharpe and Dohme, speakers’ honoraria from Genentech, Eisai and she has received travel and congress assistance support from Pfizer. MM has received advisory board fees from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, and Eisai. Her institution, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, has received funding research from Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Eisai, and Kern. AA has received advisory board fees from Bayer, Spain. EA has received advisory board fees from Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genomic Health, and Nanostring. He has received travel support from Celgene. His institution, Hospitales Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, has received funding research from Roche, Pfizer, Sysmex, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Nanostring. EG-Y has received honoraria, travel support, and has participated in advisory boards for Pfizer, Roche, Novartis, and Eli Lilly. ÁG-Z has received investigational fees and travel support from Pfizer. JdelaH has received honoraria from AstrazZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, and Agendia. MR has received honoraria from Novartis, Roche, and Pfizer. IÁ has received consulting or advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, and Roche; speakers’ honoraria from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche, and Eisai; travel and congress assistance support from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Roche, and Eisai. CH has a stock from Pfizer and AstraZeneca, she was an employee of Pfizer during the study, and is an employee of AstraZeneca currently, where she holds a stock. MK has Pfizer stock and was an employee of Pfizer during the study. MC is employed by Pfizer and has the company’s stock options. XH is employed by Pfizer and has the company’s stock options. JAG-S has consultancy/speaker fees from Novartis, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Eisai, and AstraZeneca. He received travel support from Novartis, Roche, and Pfizer. His institution, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, received research funding from AstraZeneca. MG-G has received honoraria from Pfizer and Eisai and has participated in advisory boards of Genentech and Daiichi-Sankyo. He has received travel support from Pfizer, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Roche, and Kern. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest. A complete list of the PEARL trial collaborators is provided in the Supplementary Appendix., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Glioblastoma is the most aggressive brain tumor in adults and has few therapeutic options. The study of molecular subtype classifications may lead to improved prognostic classification and identification of new therapeutic targets. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) subtype classification has mainly been applied in U.S. clinical trials, while the intrinsic glioma subtype (IGS) has mainly been applied in European trials., Experimental Design: From paraffin-embedded tumor samples of 432 patients with uniformly treated, newly diagnosed glioblastoma, we built tissue microarrays for IHC analysis and applied RNA sequencing to the best samples to classify them according to TCGA and IGS subtypes., Results: We obtained transcriptomic results from 124 patients. There was a lack of agreement among the three TCGA classificatory algorithms employed, which was not solely attributable to intratumoral heterogeneity. There was overlapping of TCGA mesenchymal subtype with IGS cluster 23 and of TCGA classical subtype with IGS cluster 18. Molecular subtypes were not associated with prognosis, but levels of expression of 13 novel genes were identified as independent prognostic markers in glioma-CpG island methylator phenotype-negative patients, independently of clinical factors and MGMT methylation. These findings were validated in at least one external database. Three of the 13 genes were selected for IHC validation. In particular, high ZNF7 RNA expression and low ZNF7 protein expression were strongly associated with longer survival, independently of molecular subtypes., Conclusions: TCGA and IGS molecular classifications of glioblastoma have no higher prognostic value than individual genes and should be refined before being applied to clinical trials., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Standard treatment for glioblastoma is radiation with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for 6 cycles, although the optimal number of cycles of adjuvant temozolomide has long been a subject of debate. We performed a phase II randomized trial investigating whether extending adjuvant temozolomide for more than 6 cycles improved outcome., Methods: Glioblastoma patients treated at 20 Spanish hospitals who had not progressed after 6 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide were centrally randomized to stop (control arm) or continue (experimental arm) temozolomide up to a total of 12 cycles at the same doses they were receiving in cycle 6. Patients were stratified by MGMT methylation and measurable disease. The primary endpoint was differences in 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02209948)., Results: From August 2014 to November 2018, 166 patients were screened, 7 of whom were ineligible. Seventy-nine patients were included in the stop arm and 80 in the experimental arm. All patients were included in the analyses of outcomes and of safety. There were no differences in 6-month PFS (control 55.7%; experimental 61.3%), PFS, or OS between arms. MGMT methylation and absence of measurable disease were independent factors of better outcome. Patients in the experimental arm had more lymphopenia (P < 0.001), thrombocytopenia (P < 0.001), and nausea and vomiting (P = 0.001)., Conclusions: Continuing temozolomide after 6 adjuvant cycles is associated with greater toxicity but confers no additional benefit in 6-month PFS., Key Points: 1. Extending adjuvant temozolomide to 12 cycles did not improve 6-month PFS.2. Extending adjuvant temozolomide did not improve PFS or OS in any patient subset.3. Extending adjuvant temozolomide was linked to increased toxicities., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Lessons Learned: The levels of circulating follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estriol, estradiol, and estrone remained unchanged after a 12-week treatment with 0.005% estriol vaginal gel in postmenopausal women receiving nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer. These results support the safety of 0.005% estriol vaginal gel for the treatment of bothering symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy in breast cancer survivors. The results provide clinicians with confidence in the use of this product in women who do not experience symptom relief with nonhormonal remedies., Background: Symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy associated with treatment with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (NSAIs) negatively impact patients' quality of life and may affect adherence to NSAIs. Vaginal estrogens effectively improve these symptoms, although their safe use in breast cancer survivors remains unclear., Methods: Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer receiving NSAI and moderate-to-severe vaginal dryness were randomized to 0.005% estriol vaginal gel or placebo for 12 weeks. Circulating estrogens, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH), were analyzed at baseline and at weeks 1, 3, 8, and 12. The primary safety outcome was the variation in serum FSH from baseline to week 12., Results: Sixty-one women (mean age, 59 years) enrolled in the study. Small oscillations were observed in FSH and LH, although they were always maintained within the postmenopausal range. No significant differences were found in the variation of FSH and LH between baseline and week 12 from the physiological variation observed before treatment. Women receiving 0.005% estriol vaginal gel had slightly increased estriol levels at weeks 1 and 3, with a subsequent reduction until normalizing at week 12; estradiol and estrone remained the below limit-of-quantitation in almost all samples., Conclusion: Ultralow-dose 0.005% estriol vaginal gel did not significantly influence estrogens, FSH, and LH levels in women with breast cancer receiving NSAI. A transient negligible absorption of estriol and a nonsignificant variation of FSH after 12 weeks were observed. These findings provide confidence for the safe use of 0.005% estriol vaginal gel in women with breast cancer with an indication for treatment with vaginal estrogens., (© 2020 ITF Research Pharma S.L.U. The Oncologist published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of AlphaMed Press.)

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) diagnosis in young women negatively impacts on quality of life (QoL) and daily activities, disrupting their life project and forcing them to face new psychosocial challenges. The recently published results on the improvement of the overall survival of pre- or perimenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy, while preserving, and in some items improving their QoL, will change the landscape of the management of this patient population. Their extended survival and potential improvement in QoL will, therefore, modify their specific needs in terms of psychosocial support. The complexity of the care of young women with MBC is described herein, based on an extensive literature review. Further research about the specific psychosocial requirements of these women and a new multidisciplinary holistic approach is paramount to properly address their concerns and preferences. The communication with and support of their partners, parents and children is an important factor affecting the QoL of these patients. Altogether, a multidisciplinary care, open communication and personalized support is required to address the psychosocial implications of the new prognostic expectations on these patients with the incorporation of new targeted therapies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Mireia Margelí Vila has received honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre and Roche. Sonia del Barco Berron has received honoraria from Novartis. Miguel Gil-Gil has received honoraria from Daiichi, Eisai, Genentech, Novartis and Pfizer and reimbursement of congress travel expenses from Roche, Daiichi and Pfizer. Cristian Ochoa-Arnedo has received honoraria from Eisai and Novartis. Rafael Villanueva Vázquez has received honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, Eisai and Roche., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Proper immune system function hinders cancer development, but little is known about whether genetic variants linked to cancer risk alter immune cells. Here, we report 57 cancer risk loci associated with differences in immune and/or stromal cell contents in the corresponding tissue. Predicted target genes show expression and regulatory associations with immune features. Polygenic risk scores also reveal associations with immune and/or stromal cell contents, and breast cancer scores show consistent results in normal and tumor tissue. SH2B3 links peripheral alterations of several immune cell types to the risk of this malignancy. Pleiotropic SH2B3 variants are associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. A retrospective case-cohort study indicates a positive association between blood counts of basophils, leukocytes, and monocytes and age at breast cancer diagnosis. These findings broaden our knowledge of the role of the immune system in cancer and highlight promising prevention strategies for individuals at high risk., Competing Interests: Declaration of Interests M.A.P. is recipient of an unrestricted research grant from Roche Pharma for the development of the ProCURE ICO research program. C.F. received support from Pfizer unrelated to this study., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

This study evaluates the impact of breast cancer (BC) in health related quality of life (HRQL) and in psychological distress (PD) during the initial phases of the disease and looks for contributing factors. A multicentric case-control study, EpiGEICAM, was carried out. Incident BC cases and age- and residence- matched controls were included. Clinical, epidemiological, HRQL (SF-36) and PD information (GHQ-28) was collected. We used multivariable logistic regression models to estimate OR of low HRQL and of PD in cases compared to controls, and to identify factors associated with low HRQL and with PD. Among 896 BC cases and 890 control women, cases had poorer scores than both, the reference population and the control group, in all SF-36 scales. BC women with lower education, younger, active workers, never smokers, those with comorbidities, in stage IV and with surgical treatment had lower physical HRQL; factors associated with low mental HRQL were dissatisfaction with social support, being current smoker and having children. Cases had a fivefold increased odds of PD compared to controls. Managing comorbidities and trying to promote social support, especially in younger and less educated women, could improve well-being of BC patients.

Background: Eribulin improves survival in pre-treated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, limited data exist on co-morbidities and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy. The purpose of this study was to review eribulin's efficacy and safety in everyday clinical practice with special focus on age, body mass index (BMI) and central nervous system (CNS) activity., Methods: An observational study was conducted in a series of HER2-negative ABC patients treated from January'14-December'17 outside a clinical trial. Objective Response Rate (ORR), Progression Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), and association of clinical and pathological variables with outcome were evaluated., Results: Ninety-five women were treated with at least one cycle of eribulin. Median age was 57 (33-83), and 18% were obese. Median number of prior chemotherapies for ABC was 3 (2-5) and 76% of patients had visceral metastases, including 21% with CNS involvement. Most tumors were estrogen receptor-positive (79%). ORR and stable disease (SD) at 6 months were 26.2 and 37.5%, respectively. Remarkably, relevant CNS efficacy was observed with eribulin: 20% of patients obtained partial response and 25% SD. Treatment was generally well tolerated and manageable, with 29% grade 3 and 10.9% grade 4 toxicities. Median PFS and OS were 4.1 months (CI95% 3.2-4.9) and 11.1 months (CI95% 9.5-14.7), respectively. Triple-negative disease, > 2organs involved and being younger than 70 years old were independent prognosis factors for worse OS in multivariate analysis. Most patients (75%) progressed in pre-existing metastases sites., Conclusion: In everyday clinical practice, eribulin's efficacy seems similar to pivotal trials. CNS-efficacy was observed. TNBC, > 2 organs involved and being younger than 70 years old were independent prognosis factors for worse OS. Remarkably, less incidence of grade 4-toxicity compared to previous studies was found.

Background: We identify cognitive impairment and MRI structural brain changes in long-term oligodendroglial tumor survivors treated with radiation therapy (RT) alone (21%) or with chemotherapy (CT) (79%)., Methods: Oligodendroglial tumor patients (based on the World Health Organization [WHO] 2007 classification) who completed RT ± CT at least 2 years before the study initiation, were classified into 3 groups according to the time treatment was completed: Group 1 = 2-5 years (n = 22), Group 2 = 6-10 years (n = 13), and Group 3 >10 years (n = 13). All patients had a cross-sectional neuropsychological evaluation (n = 48) and a longitudinal volumetric analysis (gray matter [GM; n = 34]) between postsurgical and last follow-up MRI. White matter (WM) changes on MRI were assessed using a qualitative scale., Results: There were no differences regarding tumor or treatment-related characteristics between groups. Six of 22 patients (27.3%) in Group 1; 5/13 (38.5%) in Group 2; and 9/13 (69.2%) in Group 3 had cognitive impairment that was considered severe in 3/22 patients (13.6%) in Group 1; 4/13 (30.8%) in Group 2; and 6/13 (46.2%) in Group 3. Patients in Groups 2 and 3 showed significant GM atrophy and more leukoencephalopathy than Group 1. Cognitive deficits were associated with brain atrophy and WM changes., Conclusions: Long-term oligodendroglial tumor survivors who underwent standard RT ± CT treatment, mainly >5 years of its completion, present cognitive impairment, especially on memory and executive functions, associated with late GM and WM damage, thus highlighting the need of developing future strategies in patients with oligodendroglial tumor and long expected survival., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: HER2-enriched subtype has been associated with higher response to neoadjuvant anti-HER2-based therapy across various clinical trials. However, limited data exist in real-world practice and regarding residual disease. Here, we evaluate the association of HER2-enriched with pathological response (pCR) and gene expression changes in pre- and post-treatment paired samples in HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated outside of a clinical trial. Methods: We evaluated clinical-pathological data from a consecutive series of 150 patients with stage II-IIIC HER2-positive breast cancer treated from August 2004 to December 2012 with trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Expression of 105 breast cancer-related genes, including the PAM50 genes, was determined in available pre-and post-treatment formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples using the nCounter platform. Intrinsic molecular subtypes were determined using the research-based PAM50 predictor. Association of genomic variables with total pCR was performed. Results: The pCR rate was 53.3%, with higher pCR among hormonal receptor (HR)-negative tumors (70 vs. 39%; P < 0.001). A total of 89 baseline and 28 residual tumors were profiled, including pre- and post-treatment paired samples from 26 patients not achieving a pCR. HER2-enriched was the predominant baseline subtype not only in the overall and HR-negative cohorts (64 and 75%, respectively), but also in the HR-positive cohort (55%). HER2-enriched was associated with higher pCR rates compared to non-HER2-enriched subtypes (65 vs. 31%; OR = 4.07, 95% CI 1.65-10.61, P < 0.002) and this association was independent of HR status. In pre- and post-treatment paired samples from patients not achieving a pCR, a lower proportion of HER2-enriched and twice the number of luminal tumors were observed at baseline, and luminal A was the most frequent subtype in residual tumors. Interestingly, most (81.8%) HER2-enriched tumors changed to non-HER2-enriched, whereas most luminal A samples maintained the same subtype in residual tumors. Conclusions: Outside of a clinical trial, PAM50 HER2-enriched subtype predicts pCR beyond HR status following trastuzumab-based chemotherapy in HER2-positive disease. The clinical value of intrinsic molecular subtype in residual disease warrants further investigation.

Background: This hypothesis-generating trial evaluated neoadjuvant ipatasertib-paclitaxel for early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)., Patients and Methods: In this randomized phase II trial, patients with early TNBC (T ≥ 1.5 cm, N0-2) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 with ipatasertib 400 mg or placebo (days 1-21 every 28 days) for 12 weeks before surgery. Co-primary end points were pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (ypT0/TisN0) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and immunohistochemistry phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-low populations. Secondary end points included pCR rate in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors and pre-surgery response rates by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)., Results: pCR rates with ipatasertib versus placebo were 17% versus 13%, respectively, in the ITT population (N = 151), 16% versus 13% in the immunohistochemistry PTEN-low population (N = 35), and 18% versus 12% in the PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered subgroup (N = 62). Rates of overall and complete response (CR) by MRI favored ipatasertib in all three populations (CR rate 39% versus 9% in the PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered subgroup). Ipatasertib was associated with more grade ≥3 adverse events (32% versus 16% with placebo), especially diarrhea (17% versus 1%). Higher cycle 1 day 8 (C1D8) immune score was significantly associated with better response only in placebo-treated patients. All ipatasertib-treated patients with low immune scores and a CR had PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors., Conclusions: Adding ipatasertib to 12 weeks of paclitaxel for early TNBC did not clinically or statistically significantly increase pCR rate, although overall response rate by MRI was numerically higher with ipatasertib. The antitumor effect of ipatasertib was most pronounced in biomarker-selected patients. Safety was consistent with prior experience of ipatasertib-paclitaxel. A T-cell-rich environment at C1D8 had a stronger association with improved outcomes in paclitaxel-treated patients than seen for baseline tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. This dependency may be overcome with the addition of AKT inhibition, especially in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors., Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02301988., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Circulating biomarkers in blood may provide an interesting alternative to risky tissue biopsies in the diagnosis and follow-up of glioblastoma patients. We have assessed MGMT methylation status in blood and tissue samples from unresected glioblastoma patients who had been included in the randomized GENOM-009 trial. Paired blood and tissue samples were assessed by methylation-specific PCR (MSP) and pyrosequencing (PYR). After establishing the minimum PYR cut-off that could yield a significant difference in overall survival, we assessed the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) of the analyses. Methylation could be detected in cfDNA by both MSP and PYR but with low concordance with results in tissue. Sensitivity was low for both methods (31% and 38%, respectively), while specificity was higher for MSP in blood than for PYR in plasma (96% vs 76%) and NPV was similar (56 vs 57%). Concordance of results in tissue by MSP and PYR was 84.3% (P < 0.001) and correlated with outcome. We conclude that detection of cfDNA in the blood of glioblastoma patients can be an alternative when tumor tissue is not available but methods for the detection of cfDNA in blood must improve before it can replace analysis in tumor tissue.

Background: We assessed the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BEV) through multiple lines in patients with recurrent glioblastoma who had progressed after first-line treatment with radiotherapy, temozolomide, and BEV., Patients and Methods: TAMIGA (NCT01860638) was a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in adult patients with glioblastoma. Following surgery, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma received first-line treatment consisting of radiotherapy plus temozolomide and BEV, followed by six cycles of temozolomide and BEV, then BEV monotherapy until disease progression (PD1). Randomization occurred at PD1 (second line), and patients received lomustine (CCNU) plus BEV (CCNU + BEV) or CCNU plus placebo (CCNU + placebo) until further disease progression (PD2). At PD2 (third line), patients continued BEV or placebo with chemotherapy (investigator's choice). The primary endpoint was survival from randomization. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival in the second and third lines (PFS2 and PFS3) and safety., Results: Of the 296 patients enrolled, 123 were randomized at PD1 (CCNU + BEV, n = 61; CCNU + placebo, n = 62). The study was terminated prematurely because of the high drop-out rate during first-line treatment, implying underpowered inferential testing. The proportion of patients receiving corticosteroids at randomization was similar (BEV 33%, placebo 31%). For the CCNU + BEV and CCNU + placebo groups, respectively, median survival from randomization was 6.4 versus 5.5 months (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.59), median PFS2 was 2.3 versus 1.8 months (stratified HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.48-1.00), median PFS3 was 2.0 versus 2.2 months (stratified HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.37-1.33), and median time from randomization to a deterioration in health-related quality of life was 1.4 versus 1.3 months (stratified HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.52-1.12). The incidence of treatment-related grade 3 to 4 adverse events was 19% (CCNU + BEV) versus 15% (CCNU + placebo)., Conclusion: There was no survival benefit and no detriment observed with continuing BEV through multiple lines in patients with recurrent glioblastoma., Implications for Practice: Previous research suggested that there may be value in continuing bevacizumab (BEV) beyond progression through multiple lines of therapy. No survival benefit was observed with the use of BEV through multiple lines in patients with glioblastoma who had progressed after first-line treatment (radiotherapy + temozolomide + BEV). No new safety concerns arose from the use of BEV through multiple lines of therapy., Competing Interests: Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article., (© AlphaMed Press 2018.)

FN14 has been implicated in many intracellular signaling pathways, and GRP94 is a well-known endoplasmic reticulum protein regulated by glucose. Recently, both have been associated with metastasis progression in breast cancer patients. We studied the usefulness of FN14 and GRP94 expression to stratify breast cancer patients according their risk of brain metastasis (BrM) progression. We analyzed FN14 and GRP94 by immunohistochemistry in a retrospective multicenter study using tissue microarrays from 208 patients with breast carcinomas, of whom 52 had developed BrM. Clinical and pathological characteristics and biomarkers expression in Luminal and non-Luminal patients were analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for covariates, and brain metastasis-free survival (BrMFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. FN14 expression was associated with BrM progression mainly in Luminal breast cancer patients with a sensitivity (53.85%) and specificity (89.60%) similar to Her2 expression (46.15 and 89.84%, respectively). Moreover, the likelihood to develop BrM in FN14-positive Luminal carcinomas increased 36.70-fold (3.65-368.25, p  = 0.002). Furthermore, the worst prognostic factor for BrMFS in patients with Luminal carcinomas was FN14 overexpression (HR = 8.25; 95% CI: 2.77-24.61; p  = 0.00015). In these patients, GRP94 overexpression also increased the risk of BrM (HR = 3.58; 95% CI: 0.98-13.11; p  = 0.054-Wald test). Therefore, FN14 expression in Luminal breast carcinomas is a predictive/prognostic biomarker of BrM, which combined with GRP94 predicts BrM progression in non-Luminal tumors 4.04-fold (1.19-8.22, p  = 0.025), suggesting that both biomarkers are useful to stratify BrM risk at early diagnosis. We propose a new follow-up protocol for the early prevention of clinical BrM of breast cancer patients with BrM risk.

Context: Neuropathic pain can be present in patients developing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Nerve growth factor (NGF) is trophic to small sensory fibers and regulates nociception., Objectives: We investigated the changes in serum NGF and intraepidermal nerve fiber density in skin biopsies of cancer patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy in a single-center prospective observational study., Methods: Patients were evaluated before and after chemotherapy administration. CIPN was graded with Total Neuropathy Score © , nerve conduction studies, and National Common Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events scale. Neuropathic pain was defined according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-CIPN20 questionnaire., Results: Neuropathic pain was present in 13 of 60 patients (21%), who reported shooting or burning pain in the hands (n = 9) and the feet (n = 12). Patients displaying painful CIPN presented higher NGF after treatment compared with patients with painless or absent CIPN (8.7 ± 11.9 vs. 2.5 ± 1.4 pg/mL, P = 0.016). The change of NGF significantly correlated with neuropathic pain. Patients with painful CIPN did not show significant loss of IEFND compared with patients with painless or absent CIPN (6.16 ± 3.86 vs. 8.37 ± 4.82, P = 0.12). No correlation between IEFND and NGF was observed., Conclusion: Serum NGF increases in cancer patients receiving taxane or platinum with painful CIPN, suggesting that it might be a potential biomarker of the presence and severity of neuropathic pain in this population. Long-term comprehensive studies to better define the course of NGF in relation with neurological outcomes would be helpful in the further design of therapies for CIPN-related neuropathic pain., (Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We explored predictive factors of pseudoprogression (PsP) and its impact on prognosis in a retrospective series of uniformly treated glioblastoma patients. Patients were classified as having PsP, early progression (eP) or neither (nP). We examined potential associations with clinical, molecular, and basal imaging characteristics and compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS) as well as the relationship between PFS and PPS in the three groups. Of the 256 patients studied, 56 (21.9%) were classified as PsP, 70 (27.3%) as eP, and 130 (50.8%) as nP. Only MGMT methylation status was associated to PsP. MGMT methylated patients had a 3.5-fold greater possibility of having PsP than eP (OR: 3.48; 95% CI: 1.606-7.564; P = 0.002). OS was longer for PsP than eP patients (18.9 vs. 12.3 months; P = 0.0001) but was similar for PsP and nP patients (P = 0.91). OS was shorter-though not significantly so-for PsP than nP patients (OS: 19.5 vs. 27.9 months; P = 0.63) in methylated patients. PPS was similar for patients having PsP, eP or nP (PPS: 7.2 vs. 5.4 vs. 6.7; P = 0.43). Neurological deterioration occurred in 64.3% of cases at the time they were classified as PsP and in 72.8% of cases of eP (P = 0.14). PsP confounds the evaluation of disease and does not confer a survival advantage in glioblastoma., (© 2017 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: We conducted a multicenter, 2-stage, open-label, phase II trial to assess the efficacy and safety of dacomitinib in adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GB) and epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) amplification with or without variant III (EGFRvIII) deletion., Methods: Patients with first recurrence were enrolled in 2 cohorts. Cohort A included patients with EGFR gene amplification without EGFRvIII mutation. Cohort B included patients with EGFR gene amplification and EGFRvIII mutation. Dacomitinib was administered (45 mg/day) until disease progression/unacceptable adverse events (AEs). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS; RANO criteria) at 6 months (PFS6)., Results: Thirty patients in Cohort A and 19 in Cohort B were enrolled. Median age was 59 years (range 39-81), 65.3% were male, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0/1/2 were 10.2%/65.3%/24.5%, respectively. PFS6 was 10.6% (Cohort A: 13.3%; Cohort B: 5.9%) with a median PFS of 2.7 months (Cohort A: 2.7 mo; Cohort B: 2.6 mo). Four patients were progression free at 6 months and 3 patients were so at 12 months. Median overall survival was 7.4 months (Cohort A: 7.8 mo; Cohort B: 6.7 mo). The best overall response included 1 complete response and 2 partial responses (4.1%). Stable disease was observed in 12 patients (24.5%: eight in Cohort A and four in Cohort B). Diarrhea and rash were the most common AEs; 20 (40.8%) patients experienced grade 3-4 drug-related AEs., Conclusions: Dacomitinib has a limited single-agent activity in recurrent GB with EGFR amplification. The detailed molecular characterization of the 4 patients with response in this trial can be useful to select patients who could benefit from dacomitinib., (© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com)

Cumulative toxicity from weekly paclitaxel (myalgia, peripheral neuropathy, fatigue) compromises long-term administration. Preclinical data suggest that the burden of critically short telomeres (< 3 kilobases, CSTs), but not average telomere length by itself, accounts for limited tissue renewal and turnover capacity. The impact of this parameter (which can be modified with different therapies) in chemotherapy-derived toxicity has not been studied.Blood from 115 treatment-naive patients from a clinical trial in early HER2-negative breast cancer that received weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 for 12 weeks) either alone or in combination with nintedanib and from 85 healthy controls was prospectively obtained and individual CSTs and average telomere lenght were determined by HT Q-FISH (high-throughput quantitative FISH). Toxicity was graded according to NCI common toxicity criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE V.4.0). The variable under study was "number of toxic episodes" during the 12 weeks of therapy.The percentage of CSTs ranged from 6.5%-49.4% and was directly associated with the number of toxic events (R2 = 0.333; P < 0.001). According to a linear regression model, each 18% increase in the percentage of CSTs was associated to one additional toxic episode during the paclitaxel cycles; this effect was independent of the age or treatment arm. Patients in the upper quartile (> 21.9% CSTs) had 2-fold higher number of neuropathy (P = 0.04) or fatigue (P = 0.019) episodes and >3-fold higher number of myalgia episodes (P = 0.005). The average telomere length was unrelated to the incidence of side effects.The percentage of CSTs, but not the average telomere size, is associated with weekly paclitaxel-derived toxicity.

Purpose: We previously detected promising efficacy of neoadjuvant nintedanib (a multityrosine kinase inhibitor, TKI) in early HER2-negative breast cancer. In a preclinical study, we monitored stromal hypoxia with 18 F-fluoromisonidazole-positron emission tomography (18F-FMISO-PET); we found that reoxygenation of tumors (or lack of it) during a window-of-opportunity (WoO) treatment with TKIs correlated with the benefit (or lack of it) from TKI-plus-chemotherapy combinations. We studied the predictive role of 18F-FMISO-PET for the TKI nintedanib in the neoadjuvant setting in a phase II WoO randomized trial. Experimental Design: Patients were randomized to a 14-day WoO of nintedanib preceded and followed by an 18F-FMISO-PET, followed by nintedanib plus weekly paclitaxel (Arm A) or an 18F-FMISO-PET followed by weekly paclitaxel (Arm B) before surgery. The endpoint was residual cancer burden (RCB). The objective was to detect the patients with no response (RCB-III) on the basis of the baseline or evolutive 18F-FMISO-PET values/changes. Results: One-hundred and thirty HER2-negative patients were randomized. Seventeen (27.9%), 34 (55.7%), and 8 (13.1%) patients had an RCB of III, II, and I/0, respectively, in Arm A. In this arm, baseline hypoxic tumors had a 4.4-fold higher chance of experiencing RCB = 3 ( P = 0.036) compared with baseline normoxic tumors. Nintedanib WoO induced tumor reoxygenation in 24.5% of the patients; those not reoxygenating showed a trend toward higher chance of experiencing RCB-III (6.4-fold; P = 0.09). In Arm B, 18F-FMISO-PET lacked predictive/prognostic value. Conclusions: Baseline hypoxic tumors (measured with 18F-FMISO-PET) do not benefit from neoadjuvant nintedanib. Clin Cancer Res; 23(6); 1432-41. ©2016 AACR ., (©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background and Objective: It remains controversial whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) should be performed before or after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of SLNB before NAT at a single institution, and to determine its relation to patient prognosis., Methods: A prospective study of T1c-T2-T3 N0 breast cancer patients, after ultrasound examination, who underwent SLNB prior to NAT. Overall, disease-specific and disease-free survival were calculated by Kaplan-Meier curves., Results: SLNB before NAT was performed in 123 patients from December 2006 to May 2014. The identification rate was 100%. SLNB was positive in 42.3% of cases (27.6% macrometastases). NAT was chemotherapy in 88.6% of cases and endocrine-therapy in 11.4%. Lymphadenectomy was avoided in 72.4% of cases. Median follow-up was 40 months (range 8-100). Overall and disease-free survival was 90.2% and 88.6% respectively.SLN involvement was not related to patient outcome (p 0.72); however there were significant differences in survival according to molecular-like subtypes (p < 0.025) and NAT response (p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: SLNB prior to NAT is an accurate method of axillary staging associated with a high identification rate. It avoided lymphadenectomy in more than 70% of patients. SLN involvement did not worsen the prognosis in our cohort., (Copyright © 2017 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The use of bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma is controversial. Here we show data on patients who responded to bevacizumab, then stopped bevacizumab for any reason other than progression and were rechallenged with bevacizumab at the time of subsequent progression., Methods: This retrospective study included 28 patients, classified in 2 cohorts: those for whom the first exposure to bevacizumab (BEV-1) was first-line treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (Bev-F; N = 12) and those for whom BEV-1 was second- or third-line treatment for recurrent disease after standard treatment (Bev-S; N = 16)., Results: All patients received standard radiotherapy plus temozolomide. Bev-F patients also received concomitant bevacizumab. All 28 patients received a total of 57 treatment lines with bevacizumab (12 first-line and 45 second- or further-line). Twenty-nine lines were rechallenges (BEV-2 [ N = 26] or BEV-3 [ N = 3]). Objective response to rechallenge was 58.6% and clinical benefit was 89.6%. Overall survival (OS) was 55 months for RPA class IV and 26.7 months for RPA class V patients ( P = .01). OS was 26.7 months for Bev-F patients and 52.1 months for Bev-S patients ( P = .004). Post-progression survival was 20 months for Bev-F patients and 39.6 months for Bev-S patients (HR = 0.26; P = .007)., Conclusion: This is the largest study to examine the impact of a bevacizumab rechallenge in glioblastoma patients who had responded to previous bevacizumab treatment but who stopped before progression. Our findings indicate that these patients can attain a second response or clinical benefit from re-introduction of bevacizumab. The potential benefit from intermittent versus continuous treatment warrants comparison in clinical trials.