Search

BACKGROUND: Garcinia cambogia, either alone or with green tea, is commonly promoted for weight loss. Sporadic cases of liver failure from G. cambogia have been reported, but its role in liver injury is controversial. METHODS: Among 1418 patients enrolled in the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) from 2004 to 2018, we identified 22 cases (adjudicated with high confidence) of liver injury from G. cambogia either alone (n=5) or in combination with green tea (n=16) or Ashwagandha (n=1). Control groups consisted of 57 patients with liver injury from herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) containing green tea without G. cambogia and 103 patients from other HDS. RESULTS: Patients who took G. cambogia were between 17 to 54 years, with liver injury arising 13 to 223 days (median = 51) after the start. One patient died, one required liver transplantation, and 91% were hospitalized. The liver injury was hepatocellular with jaundice. Although the peak values of aminotransferases were significantly higher (2001 ± 1386 U/L) in G. cambogia group (p

Palliative care (PC) benefits patients with serious illness including end-stage liver disease (ESLD). As part of a cluster randomized trial, hepatologists were trained to deliver primary palliative care to patients with ESLD using an online course, Palliative Care Always: Hepatology (PCA:Hep). Here we present a multimethod formative evaluation (feasibility, knowledge acquisition, self-efficacy, and practice patterns) of PCA:Hep. Feasibility was measured by completion of coursework and achieving a course grade of >80%. Knowledge acquisition was measured through assessments before and throughout the course. Pre/post-course surveys were conducted to determine self-efficacy and practice patterns. The hepatologists (n = 39) enrolled in a 12-week online course and spent 1-3 hours on the course weekly. The course was determined to be feasible as 97% successfully completed the course and 100% passed. The course was acceptable to participants; 91.7 % reported a positive course experience and satisfaction with knowledge gained (91.6%). The pre/post knowledge assessment showed an improvement of 6.0% (pre 85.9% to post 91.9%, 95% CI [2.8, 9.2], P = 0.001). Self-efficacy increased significantly (P < 0.001) in psychological symptom management, hospice, and psychosocial support. A year after training, over 80% of the hepatologists reported integrating a variety of PC skills into routine patient care. Conclusion: PCA:Hep is feasible, acceptable, and improves learner knowledge and confidence in palliative care skills. This is a viable method to teach primary PC skills to specialists caring for patients with ESLD.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Herbal supplements, and particularly multi-ingredient products, have become increasingly common causes of acute liver injury. Green tea is a frequent component in implicated products, but its role in liver injury is controversial. The aim of this study was to better characterize the clinical features, outcomes, and pathogenesis of green tea-associated liver injury. APPROACH AND RESULTS Among 1,414 patients enrolled in the U.S. Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network who underwent formal causality assessment, 40 cases (3%) were attributed to green tea, 202 to dietary supplements without green tea, and 1,142 to conventional drugs. The clinical features of green tea cases and representation of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II alleles in cases and control were analyzed in detail. Patients with green tea-associated liver injury ranged in age from 17 to 69 years (median = 40) and developed symptoms 15-448 days (median = 72) after starting the implicated agent. The liver injury was typically hepatocellular (95%) with marked serum aminotransferase elevations and only modest increases in alkaline phosphatase. Most patients were jaundiced (83%) and symptomatic (88%). The course was judged as severe in 14 patients (35%), necessitating liver transplantation in 3 (8%), but rarely resulting in chronic injury (3%). In three instances, injury recurred upon re-exposure to green tea with similar clinical features, but shorter time to onset. HLA typing revealed a high prevalence of HLA-B*35:01, found in 72% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58-87) of green tea cases, but only 15% (95% CI, 10-20) caused by other supplements and 12% (95% CI, 10-14) attributed to drugs, the latter rate being similar to population controls (11%; 95% CI, 10.5-11.5). CONCLUSIONS Green tea-related liver injury has distinctive clinical features and close association with HLA-B*35:01, suggesting that it is idiosyncratic and immune mediated.

Background and Aims: In the REALM (Randomized, Observational Study of Entecavir to Assess Long-Term Outcomes Associated with Nucleoside/Nucleotide Monotherapy for Patients with Chronic HBV Infection) study, 12,378 patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection received up to 10 years of randomized therapy with entecavir or another HBV nucleos(t)ide analogue. Monitored clinical outcome events (COEs) included malignant neoplasms, HBV disease progression events, and deaths. An external event adjudication committee (EAC) was convened to provide real-time review of reported COEs to optimize data quality, and minimize potential adverse effects of the large cohort, interdisciplinary outcome assessments, geographic scope, and long duration. Methods: The EAC comprised an international group of hepatologists and oncologists with expertise in diagnosis of targeted COEs. The EAC reviewed and adjudicated COEs according to prospectively defined diagnostic criteria captured in the EAC charter. Operational processes, including data collection and query procedures, were implemented to optimize efficiency of data recovery to maximize capture of adjudicated COEs, the primary study outcome measure. Results: A total of 1724 COEs were reported and 1465 of these events were adjudicated by the EAC as reported by the investigators (85.0% overall concordance). Concordance by COE type varied: deaths, 99.6%; hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), 83.3%; non-HCC malignancies, 88.0%; non-HCC HBV disease progression, 68.2%. Reasons for lack of concordance were most commonly lack of adequate supporting data to support an adjudicated diagnosis or evidence that the event pre-dated the study. Conclusions: The REALM EAC performed a critical role in ensuring data quality and consistency; EAC performance was facilitated by well-defined diagnostic criteria, effective data capture, and efficient operational processes. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00388674.

Although drug‐induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare clinical event, it carries significant morbidity and mortality, leaving it as the leading cause of acute liver failure in the United States. It is one of the most challenging diagnoses encountered by gastroenterologists. The development of various drug injury networks has played a vital role in expanding our knowledge regarding drug‐related and herbal and dietary supplement–related liver injury. In this review, we discuss what defines liver injury, epidemiology of DILI, its biochemical and pathologic patterns, and management., Although drug‐induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare clinical event, it carries significant morbidity and mortality, leaving it as the leading cause of acute liver failure in the United States. It is one of the most challenging diagnoses encountered by gastroenterologists. DILI is also the most common single adverse event that has led to withdrawal of drugs from the marketplace, drug attrition, and failure of implicated drugs to obtain Food and Drug Administration approval. The development of various drug injury networks have played a vital role in expanding our knowledge regarding drug‐related and herbal and dietary supplement–related liver injury. In this review, we discuss what defines liver injury, epidemiology of DILI, its biochemical and pathologic patterns, and management.

Background & aims Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) is widely used in Indian Ayurvedic medicine. Several dietary supplements containing ashwagandha are marketed in the US and Europe, but only one case of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) due to ashwagandha has been published. The aim of this case series was to describe the clinical phenotype of suspected ashwagandha-induced liver injury. Methods Five cases of liver injury attributed to ashwagandha-containing supplements were identified; three were collected in Iceland during 2017-2018 and two from the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) in 2016. Other causes for liver injury were excluded. Causality was assessed using the DILIN structured expert opinion causality approach. Results Among the five patients, three were males; mean age was 43 years (range 21-62). All patients developed jaundice and symptoms such as nausea, lethargy, pruritus and abdominal discomfort after a latency of 2-12 weeks. Liver injury was cholestatic or mixed (R ratios 1.4-3.3). Pruritus and hyperbilirubinaemia were prolonged (5-20 weeks). No patient developed hepatic failure. Liver tests normalized within 1-5 months in four patients. One patient was lost to follow-up. One biopsy was performed, showing acute cholestatic hepatitis. Chemical analysis confirmed ashwagandha in available supplements; no other toxic compounds were identified. No patient was taking potentially hepatotoxic prescription medications, although four were consuming additional supplements, and in one case, rhodiola was a possible causative agent along with ashwagandha. Conclusions These cases illustrate the hepatotoxic potential of ashwagandha. Liver injury is typically cholestatic or mixed with severe jaundice and pruritus, but self-limited with liver tests normalizing in 1-5 months.

Background : Kratom is a botanical product used as an opium substitute with abuse potential. Methods : Assessment of suspected cases of kratom-induced liver injury in a prospective US cohort. Results : Eleven cases of liver injury attributed to kratom were identified with a recent increase. The majority were male with median age 40 years. All were symptomatic and developed jaundice with a median latency of 14 days. The liver injury pattern was variable, most required hospitalization and all eventually recovered. Biochemical analysis revealed active kratom ingredients. Conclusion : Kratom can cause severe liver injury with jaundice.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aims were to review the diagnosis, testing and presentation of acute hepatitis C (HCV) in patients initially diagnosed to have drug-induced liver injury (DILI) enrolled in the US DILI Network. METHODS: All patients with suspected DILI underwent testing for competing causes of liver injury and returned for 6-month follow-up. Causality was adjudicated by consensus expert opinion. RESULTS: Between 2004–2016, 1518 patients were enrolled and adjudicated and underwent 6 months of follow up. Initial locally acquired anti-HCV results were available in 1457 (96%), but HCV RNA in only 795 (52%). Stored sera were available for repeat testing, so that results were available on all 1518 patients (1457 for anti-HCV and 1482 for HCV RNA). 104 subjects (6.9%) had evidence of HCV infection- 10 positive for HCV RNA alone, 16 for anti-HCV alone and 78 for both. All 104 HCV-positive cases were reviewed and 23 cases were adjudicated as acute HCV. All presented with acute hepatocellular injury with median ALT 1448 U/L, alkaline phosphatase 232 U/L and total bilirubin 10.8 mg/dL. 22 (96%) patients were jaundiced. While all 23 cases initially had been suspected of having DILI, 19 were adjudicated as acute HCV and not DILI at the 6 month follow-up; while 4 were still considered DILI. CONCLUSIONS: 23 of 1518 (1.5%) cases of suspected DILI were due to acute HCV infection. We recommend that initial and follow up HCV RNA testing should be performed to exclude HCV in patients with acute hepatocellular injury and suspected DILI.

Herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) have been increasingly recognized as a cause for acute liver injury (Navarro et al. Hepatology 60(4):1399-1408, 2014; Bailey et al. J Nutr 141:261-266, 2011). HDS products frequently contain numerous ingredients, and are marketed under various product names. A perusal of marketed weight loss products indicates that green tea extract (GTE) is a common ingredient in many. We aimed to describe the course and outcome of six patients who developed liver injury attributed to SLIMQUICK(®) weight loss products.Patients with suspected drug-induced liver injury were enrolled in a prospective study of the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) and causality was assessed by a panel of hepatologists. During the period under study, 6 of 1091 cases of liver injury were attributed to a SLIMQUICK(®) product and were assigned causality scores of probable, highly likely, or definite.Six cases of acute liver injury attributed to SLIMQUICK(®) products were enrolled in the DILIN prospective study between 2007 and 2011. All were women aged 22 to 58 years. Two had a normal body weight and four were mildly obese (body mass index 22.9-32.2 kg/m(2)). All were taking SLIMQUICK(®) products for weight loss and no patient reported prior use. Laboratory tests revealed a hepatocellular pattern of injury, with initial alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels above 1000 U/L in all but one patient. Three patients were hospitalized and one underwent successful liver transplantation. No patients died of liver injury. GTE and/or its component catechins were listed among the ingredients for five of the six products.SLIMQUICK(®) products can lead to severe acute hepatocellular liver injury, which may result in transplantation. Given the frequency of GTE as a component in weight loss products, this ingredient should be studied further as a possible cause for liver injury.

Herbal and dietary supplement (HDS) hepatotoxicity is increasingly being reported in the USA. This case series describes the presenting clinical features and outcomes of seven patients with liver injury attributed to OxyELITE Pro enrolled in the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) study. The 6-month outcomes of patients with hepatotoxicity attributed to OxyELITE Pro enrolled in the DILIN prospective registry between 2004 and 2015 are presented. Six of the seven patients (86 %) presented in 2013 with symptoms of hepatitis and acute hepatocellular injury. The median duration of OxyELITE Pro use was 18 weeks (range 5–102 weeks). Median age was 36 years (range 28–62), 86 % were female, and 43 % were Asian. One patient had rash, none had eosinophilia, and three had antinuclear antibody reactivity. The median peak ALT was 2242 U/L, alkaline phosphatase 284 U/L and bilirubin 15.0 mg/dL. Six patients (86 %) were hospitalized, three developed acute liver failure and two underwent liver transplantation. DILIN causality scores for OxyELITE Pro were definite in 1, highly likely in 3, probable in 2, and possible in 1. Four of the five patients without liver transplant recovered completely within 6 months, while one patient had mild residual ALT elevations. Seven cases of severe acute hepatocellular injury attributed to OxyELITE Pro are reported. These results reinforce the need to assess for HDS supplement use in patients presenting with unexplained acute hepatitis and point to the need for additional regulatory oversight of HDS products.

Herbal and dietary supplement usage has increased steadily over the past several years in the United States. Among the non-bodybuilding herbal and dietary supplements, weight loss supplements were among the most common type of HDS implicated in liver injury. While drug induced liver injury is rare, its consequences are significant and on the rise. The purpose of this review is to highlight case reports of weight loss products such as Hydroxycut and OxyElite Pro as one form of HDS that have hepatotoxic potential and to characterize its clinical effects as well as pattern of liver injury. We also propose future strategies in the identification and study of potentially hepatotoxic compounds in an effort to outline a diagnostic approach for identifying any drug induced liver injury.

Approximately half the US adult population consumes herbals and dietary supplements (HDS),(1,2) with recent reports showing their use to be increasing.(3,4) Supplement users are more commonly women, non-Hispanic whites, over age 40, and have higher levels of education than non-users.(4-7) NHANES III data indicate that multivitamins and minerals are the most common supplements used, followed by calcium and fish oils.(5) However, the range of HDS is far broader and includes numerous commercial products. Although dietary supplements are perceived as safe (8), the current regulatory framework established by the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (9) requires less evidence of safety prior to marketing as assessed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) than is required for pharmaceuticals. The FDA and other regulatory bodies can take action against a manufacturer only if there is proven adulteration or injury from its supplement. Recent cases of life-threatening hepatotoxicity from the dietary supplement OxyElite Pro (10) underscore the potential adverse consequences of this oversight process. The Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN), supported by the National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, was established in 2003 to identify, enroll, and characterize cases of drug-induced liver injury attributable to medications (excluding acetaminophen) and HDS (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT00345930).(11) The original DILIN report identified HDS as the second most common cause for liver injury. (12) Since that report, many more cases have been accrued by the DILIN. Thus, we examined the burden and characteristics of liver injury attributable to HDS in the DILIN, and compared this injury with that due to conventional medications.

Introduction: Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) suffer from myriad symptoms due to the systemic effects of the disease and unpredictable acute episodes, which contribute to progressive deterioration in quality of life (QOL). Despite clear evidence that palliative care (PC) improves QOL in other serious illnesses, PC is underutilized and delayed for ESLD patients. Through a comparative effectiveness trial of specialist led consultative PC (Model 1) versus trained hepatologist led PC (Model 2), we aim to build evidence on introducing PC into the routine outpatient care of ESLD patients. Objective: We hypothesize that trained hepatologist led PC model will have a better improvement in QOL compared to consultative PC model. Methods: This two-arm, multicenter cluster-randomized trial assesses the effectiveness of two PC models for patients with ESLD. Fourteen clinical centers will recruit 1260 patient-caregiver dyads. Each center is the unit of randomization. Hepatologists at sites randomized to the Model 2 have undergone web-based training in the principles of PC as pertained to ESLD. PC intervention is delivered over four visits (initial, one, two, and three months). Follow-up assessments occur at 6, 9, and 12 months. Eligible patients are those with new onset or ongoing complications of ESLD with a caregiver willing to participate. Outcomes: The primary outcome is change in patients' QOL from baseline to three months. Secondary outcomes include symptom burden, depression, distress, satisfaction with care, caregiver burden and QOL, goal concordant care, and health care utilization. Challenges and Contributions Engagement: A research advisory board has been developed with representatives from the participating centers, who have provided active feedback on the protocol, outcomes, study methods, and training program. Intervention Fidelity: Intervention fidelity will be maintained by adherence to a visit agenda and providers in both models completing a PC checklist after each study visit.

Herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) are used increasingly both in the United States and worldwide, and HDS-induced liver injury in the United States has increased proportionally. Current challenges in the diagnosis and management of HDS-induced liver injury were the focus of a 2-day research symposium sponsored by the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease and the National Institutes of Health. HDS-induced liver injury now accounts for 20% of cases of hepatotoxicity in the United States based on research data. The major implicated agents include anabolic steroids, green tea extract, and multi-ingredient nutritional supplements. Anabolic steroids marketed as bodybuilding supplements typically induce a prolonged cholestatic but ultimately self-limiting liver injury that has a distinctive serum biochemical as well as histological phenotype. Green tea extract and many other products, in contrast, tend to cause an acute hepatitis-like injury. Currently, however, the majority of cases of HDS-associated liver injury are due to multi-ingredient nutritional supplements, and the component responsible for the toxicity is usually unknown or can only be suspected. HDS-induced liver injury presents many clinical and research challenges in diagnosis, identification of the responsible constituents, treatment, and prevention. Also important are improvements in regulatory oversight of nonprescription products to guarantee their constituents and ensure purity and safety. The confident identification of injurious ingredients within HDS will require strategic alignments among clinicians, chemists, and toxicologists. The ultimate goal should be to prohibit or more closely regulate potentially injurious ingredients and thus promote public safety. (Hepatology 2017;65:363-373).

Background Chronic hepatitis C is associated with significant morbidity and mortality as a consequence of progression to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver failure. Current treatment for chronic hepatitis C with pegylated interferon (IFN) and ribavirin is associated with suboptimal responses and numerous adverse effects. A number of botanical products have been used to treat hepatic disorders. Silymarin, extracted from the milk thistle plant, Silybum marianum (L) Gaertn. (Asteraceae), has been most widely used for various liver disorders, including chronic hepatitis C, B, and alcoholic liver disease. However, the safety and efficacy of silymarin have not been studied systematically in chronic hepatitis C. Purpose We describe our strategy for a phased approach for studying the impact of silymarin in hepatitis C, in the context of the unique challenges of botanical product clinical trials and the development of specific and curative antiviral therapy. Methods This multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial was conducted with four clinical centers and a data-coordinating center in the United States, to assess the impact of silymarin therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed conventional antiviral therapy. Results Key aspects relevant to performing clinical trials of botanical products include early identification of an appropriate product with standard product chemistry, acquisition of pharmacokinetic and dosing information, selection of the appropriate study group, and choosing rigorous outcome variables. Potential limitations Trial participants were chronic hepatitis C patients who were nonsustained virologic responders to IFN-based therapy; therefore, the findings are not generalizable to all hepatitis C populations. Further, alanine aminotransferase, a biochemical liver test, rather than hepatitis viral RNA or liver histology was the primary end point. Conclusions The challenges identified and addressed during development of this United States multicenter Phase II trial to evaluate silymarin for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection who had failed to respond successfully to previous IFN-based therapy are common and must be addressed to conduct rigorous trials of botanical products.

Background & Aims Over-the-counter analgesics have been proposed to lead to decompensation of compensated cirrhosis or to further decompensation of an already decompensated patient. We performed a prospective, case-control study to investigate the effects of analgesics on acute hepatic decompensation. Methods Data from consecutive cirrhotic patients hospitalized at 2 tertiary care hospitals for decompensation of cirrhosis (cases, n=91) were compared with that from consecutive patients with compensated cirrhosis that were followed in the liver clinic (n = 153) and with randomly selected noncirrhotic patients concurrently hospitalized with the cases (n = 89). All patients were given a structured questionnaire to collect information on recent use of acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and alcohol. Results Only 32 (35%) of the cirrhotic patients used over-the-counter analgesics (19% acetaminophen, 16% nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), compared with 80 of the cirrhotic controls (52%; 25% acetaminophen, 31% nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), and 62 (70%) of the noncirrhotic controls. Acetaminophen use did not differ between groups, even for those with recent alcohol use. The doses and days of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use were higher among cirrhotic patients, compared with controls. Alcohol ingestion was significantly greater among patients with alcoholic cirrhosis, compared with controls. Conclusions In patients with cirrhosis, acetaminophen use at doses lower than those recommended is not associated with acute hepatic decompensation, even in patients with recent alcohol ingestion. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs might be associated with deleterious effects on cirrhosis. Alcohol ingestion is associated with decompensation in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis.

Background & Aims Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is characterized by the presence of circulating autoantibodies, hypergammaglobulinemia, necroinflammatory histology, and a response to immunosuppressive drugs. The goal of this retrospective study was to determine whether the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) or anti–smooth muscle antibodies (ASMAs) in patients with AIH correlated with clinical presentation, histologic findings, or response to immunosuppressive therapy. Methods Fifty-two patients diagnosed with AIH, on the basis of the revised scoring system of International Autoimmune Hepatitis group, were reviewed. Data on age, gender, aminotransferase levels, autoantibody titers, treatment regimens, and response to treatment were recorded. Seropositivity was defined as ANA >1:40 or ASMA >1:40. Percutaneous liver biopsies obtained at the initial presentation were reviewed. Results Forty-two patients with AIH (81%) were seropositive, and 10 (19%) were seronegative. Both groups were similar with respect to demographics, treatment regimens, and response to therapy. Histologic parameters were similar among the 2 groups, including portal and lobular inflammation, piecemeal necrosis, and centrilobular necrosis. There were no significant differences in aminotransferase levels at diagnosis or after treatment. Conclusions The prevalence of ANAs or ASMAs did not correlate with the clinical or histologic severity of AIH at diagnosis. Furthermore, there was no correlation between antibody status and response to immunosuppressive therapy. Therefore, patients who meet the diagnosis of AIH on the basis of the revised scoring system of International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group should be given immunosuppressive therapy, regardless of antibody status.

The aim of this study was to characterize knowledge of HCV, specifically in an urban, minority population. Methods: New patients, 18 or older, were prospectively enrolled at four primary care practices in Philadelphia. Demo- graphics were ascertained and a survey was administered, querying HCV knowledge. Log-linear regression was used to assess the relationship between race and knowledge, measured by percentage of correct answers. Results: There were 1657 patients enrolled in this study. Whites were most likely to choose the correct answers; Hispanics were least likely to answer questions correctly, irrespective of age and education level (p

Despite the improved efficacy of peginterferons, the rate of sustained virologic response is suboptimal in cirrhotic patients, relative to non-cirrhotic patients. However, the treatment of patients with compensated cirrhosis has recently been encouraged by expert panels. Interferon-based therapy may provide additional benefit by reducing the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients as suggested in preliminary studies. Results of two ongoing prospective studies are awaited to answer the important question of the effectiveness of suppressive interferon therapy, even in the absence of sustained virologic response. Given the importance of recurrent HCV following liver transplantation, attention has been directed toward the antiviral treatment of patients with advanced liver disease. This approach needs to be pursued with caution given the potential morbidity of the therapy. Recently, a low accelerating dosage regimen has provided excellent results and is the subject of additional inquiry.

Context.—Chronic hepatic allograft rejection is characterized by arteriopathy and bile duct loss. Pathology of the portal vein or its branches is not considered to play a major role in chronic rejection. Objective.—A recent case of chronic rejection with total fibrous obliteration of the portal vein at the hilum and graft loss prompted us to retrospectively analyze cases of failed allografts for portal vein changes. Design.—Six cases of failed hepatic allograft recorded in our files from 1994 to 1998 were selected for the study. For comparison, 4 cases of hepatitis C cirrhosis were included. Clinical features, including arteriograms or Doppler studies, were reviewed whenever available. Sections taken from the hilum and random parenchyma stained with routine hematoxylin-eosin, elastic van Gieson, and Masson trichrome were examined by 3 experienced liver pathologists in a randomized, blinded fashion. Results.—Significant hepatic artery occlusion with foam cell change and bile duct loss was seen in all cases of chronic rejection (3/3), but not in the other cases. Foam cell change in the portal vein at the hilum (3/3) and occasionally into the distal branches (2/3) with variable occlusion of the lumen was seen only in cases of chronic hepatic allograft rejection. Mild luminal narrowing was observed in all the cases of cirrhosis (4/4) as a result of phlebosclerosis, most likely representing a change secondary to portal hypertension. Total obliteration of the portal vein at the hilum was seen in the index case (case 1) only. Conclusion.—Portal venopathy can be a significant finding in chronic hepatic allograft rejection and may contribute to graft dysfunction or failure. Two-vessel disease must be considered in cases of chronic hepatic allograft rejection, and pathologists should thoroughly examine the hilum in explanted hepatic allografts.

Isoniazid is a leading cause of liver injury but it is not clear how many cases are reported or how many clinicians and patients adhere to American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines. We collected data on cases of isoniazid hepatotoxicity and assessed adherence to ATS guidelines and reports to the Centers for Disease Control's (CDC) isoniazid severe adverse events program.We analyzed Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) cases considered definite, highly likely, or probable for isoniazid injury from 2004 through 2013. We assessed the delays in isoniazid discontinuance according to ATS criteria and hepatotoxicity severity by Severity Index Score. We checked reporting to the CDC by matching cases based on age, latency, indication, reporting period, and comorbidities.Isoniazid was the second most commonly reported agent in the DILIN, with 69 cases; 60 of these met inclusion criteria. The median age of cases was 49 years (range, 4-68 y), 70% were female, 97% had latent tuberculosis, and 62% were hospitalized. Patients took a median of 9 days to stop taking isoniazid (range, 0-99 days). Thirty-three cases (55%) continued taking isoniazid for more than 7 days after the ATS criteria for stopping were met. Twenty-four cases (40%) continued isoniazid for more than 14 days after meeting criteria for stopping. A delay in stopping was associated with more severe injury (P.05). Of 13 patients who died or underwent liver transplantation, 9 (70%) continued taking isoniazid for more than 7 days after meeting criteria for stopping. Only 1 of 25 cases of isoniazid hepatotoxicity eligible for reporting to the CDC was reported.Poor adherence to ATS guidelines is common in cases of hepatotoxicity and is associated with more severe outcomes including hospitalization, death, and liver transplantation. Isoniazid continues to be a leading cause of DILI in the United States, and its hepatotoxicity is under-reported significantly.

Background & Aims The Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network is conducting a prospective study of patients with DILI in the United States. We present characteristics and subgroup analyses from the first 1257 patients enrolled in the study. Methods In an observational longitudinal study, we began collecting data on eligible individuals with suspected DILI in 2004, following them for 6 months or longer. Subjects were evaluated systematically for other etiologies, causes, and severity of DILI. Results Among 1257 enrolled subjects with suspected DILI, the causality was assessed in 1091 patients, and 899 were considered to have definite, highly likely, or probable DILI. Ten percent of patients died or underwent liver transplantation, and 17% had chronic liver injury. In the 89 patients (10%) with pre-existing liver disease, DILI appeared to be more severe than in those without (difference not statistically significant; P = .09) and mortality was significantly higher (16% vs 5.2%; P 365 days were nitrofurantoin (25%) or minocycline (17%). There were no differences in outcomes of patients with short vs long latency of DILI. Compared with individuals younger than 65 years, individuals 65 years or older (n = 149) were more likely to have cholestatic injury, although mortality and rate of liver transplantation did not differ. Nine patients (1%) had concomitant severe skin reactions; implicated agents were lamotrigine, azithromycin, carbamazepine, moxifloxacin, cephalexin, diclofenac, and nitrofurantoin. Four of these patients died. Conclusions Mortality from DILI is significantly higher in individuals with pre-existing liver disease or concomitant severe skin reactions compared with patients without. Additional studies are needed to confirm the association between azithromycin and increased DILI in patients with chronic liver disease. Older age and short or long latencies are not associated with DILI mortality.

Herbal products have been used for centuries among indigenous people to treat symptoms and illnesses. Recently, their use in Western countries has grown significantly, rivaling that of prescription medications. Currently, herbal products are used mainly for weight loss and bodybuilding purposes but also to improve well-being and symptoms of chronic diseases. Many people believe that because they are natural, they must be effective and safe; however, these beliefs are erroneous. Few herbal products have been studied in well-designed controlled trials of patients with liver or other diseases, despite testimony to the contrary. Moreover, current highly effective antiviral drugs make efforts to treat hepatitis C with herbal products redundant. Herbal products are no safer than conventional drugs and have caused liver injury severe enough to require transplantation or cause death. Furthermore, their efficacy, safety, and claims are not assessed by regulatory agencies, and there is uncertainty about their reported and unreported contents. We review the history of commonly used herbal products, as well as their purported efficacies and mechanisms and their adverse effects.

Methods A retrospective review of patients presenting with advanced liver disease defined as the presence of endoscopically identified esophageal or gastric varices for the period between January 1999 and December 2002. Etiologies of hepatic injury were identified from the clinical record and laboratory database. Patients were excluded if their disease could be attributed to more than one cause (i.e. alcohol and HCV) or had a non-hepatic cause of portal hypertension. Patients were grouped according to etiology: 1) HCV, 2) ALD, 3) hepatitis B (HBV), or 4) other (cryptogenic cirrhosis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis, portal vein thrombosis). Results A total of 411 patients were identified as having either esophageal and/or gastric varices. The mean age was 56.1 years (range 1989). There were 275 males (66.9%) and 136 females (33.1%). The proportions of females in those with HCV and ALD were similar although women were predominant in non-viral, nonalcohol related disease group compared to other diagnoses (59.4% vs. 24.3%, p

LiverTox is a freely available website ( http://LiverTox.nih.gov ) that provides up-to-date, comprehensive, and easily accessed clinical information on liver injury due to prescription and over-the-counter medications, herbals, and nutritional supplements. LiverTox includes introductory sections on the clinical course, diagnosis, phenotypic patterns, outcomes, severity scales, and causality grading systems for drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The bulk of LiverTox comprises individual sections on specific medications, including background information on the agent, a concise description of its potential and pattern of hepatotoxicity, and extensive annotated references linked to PubMed citations. For agents that cause liver injury, representative case reports are provided. Finally, LiverTox allows for submission of clinical cases of hepatotoxicity to the website, which will be added to a database that can be accessed and analyzed. LiverTox is an ambitious effort aimed not only at providing clinical information on DILI but also at stimulating and assisting future research into its cause, prevention, and treatment.

The distinction between acute rejection and early recurrent hepatitis C infection (RHCV) in the setting of orthotopic liver transplantation is often difficult. In liver biopsies acidophil bodies and lobular hepatitis are used to suggest a diagnosis of RHCV over rejection, however, the reliability of this practice has not been established. Because portal tract changes in RHCV and rejection often overlap, we sought to determine whether the degree of hepatocyte acidophil body formation seen on liver biopsies could be used to distinguish between these two conditions. Methods: Quantification of acidophil bodies was performed on liver biopsies in orthotopic liver transplant patients with RHCV (n = 10), non-hepatitis C orthotopic liver transplant patients with uncomplicated rejection episodes (n = 10) and non-transplant patients with chronic hepatitis C infection (n = 10). Hematoxylin and Eosin stained slides from all three groups were randomized and tissue segments 1.0 cm in length and of variable width (0.04–0.13 cm) were examined at 200 × magnification in a blinded fashion by two pathologists in order to quantify the number of acidophil bodies/cm2. Lobular chronic inflammation was also graded on a 0–3+ scale. Results: Liver biopsies taken at the onset of RHCV exhibited 606 ± 101 acidophil bodies/cm2 (mean ± standard error of mean, range 200–1390). These counts were significantly greater (P = .0061, paired 2-tailed t-test) than the 241 ± 53 acidophil bodies/cm2 (range 80–514) for acute rejection, and the 194 ± 21 acidophil bodies/cm2 (range 100–333) for non-liver transplant chronic hepatitis C infection (P = .0013). No difference in lobular inflammation between index RHCV and rejection biopsies was detected. Conclusions: Although there is overlap, on average there are twice as many acidophil bodies in the initial stage of RHCV when compared with acute rejection (average of 55 per linear cm in RHCV versus 21 per linear cm for rejection). Lobular inflammation was not a reliable indicator of the initial onset of RHCV.

Context The botanical product silymarin, an extract of milk thistle, is commonly used by patients to treat chronic liver disease, despite scant and conflicting evidence of its efficacy. Objective To determine the effect of silymarin on liver disease activity in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection unsuccessfully treated with interferon-based therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 4 medical centers in the United States. Participants included 154 persons with chronic HCV infection and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels of 65 U/L or greater who were previously unsuccessfully treated with interferon-based therapy. Enrollment began in May 2008 and was completed in May 2010, with the last follow-up visit completed in March 2011. Intervention Participants were randomly assigned to receive 420-mg silymarin, 700-mg silymarin, or matching placebo administered 3 times per day for 24 weeks. Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome measure was serum ALT level of 45 U/L or less (considered within the normal range) or less than 65 U/L, provided this was at least a 50% decline from baseline values. Secondary outcomes included changes in ALT levels, HCV RNA levels, and quality-of-life measures. Results After 24 weeks of treatment, only 2 participants in each treatment group (P ≥ .99) met the primary outcome measure (3.8% [95% CI, 0.5% to 13.2%] for placebo, 4.0% [95% CI, 0.5% to 13.7%] for 420-mg silymarin, and 3.8% [95% CI, 0.5% to 13.2%] for 700-mg silymarin). The mean decline in serum ALT activity at the end of treatment did not differ significantly (P = .75) across the 3 treatment groups (mean decline, −4.3 [95% CI, −17.3 to 8.7] U/L for placebo, −14.4 [95% CI, −41.6 to 12.7] U/L for 420-mg silymarin, −11.3 [95% CI, −27.9 to 5.4] U/L for 700-mg silymarin); there likewise were no significant differences in HCV RNA levels (mean change, 0.07 [95% CI, −0.05 to 0.18] log 10 IU/mL for placebo, −0.03 [95% CI, −0.18 to 0.12] log 10 IU/mL for 420-mg silymarin, 0.04 [95% CI, −0.08 to 0.16] log 10 IU/mL for 700-mg silymarin; P = .54) or quality-of-life measures. The adverse event profile of silymarin was comparable with that of placebo. Conclusion Higher than customary doses of silymarin did not significantly reduce serum ALT levels more than placebo in participants with chronic HCV infection unsuccessfully treated with interferon-based therapy. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00680342

BACKGROUND  Up to 40% of patients with HIV infection in US are coinfected with Hepatitis C (HCV).1-3  Compared to HCV monoinfected patients, coinfected patients have: – Faster progression to cirrhosis1,2 – Increased incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)4  Published AASLD guidelines recommend every 6 month ultrasound (US) as the preferred HCC screening strategy for patients with cirrhosis.5  The majority of gastroenterologists are aware of the AASLD guidelines and apply them to clinical practice.6  Real world surveillance practices among primary providers have not been assessed for coinfected patients in the United States.