Search

Abstract Background Itch is known to have a particularly high impact on psoriasis (PsO) and atopic dermatitis (AD) patients' quality of life. Although AD therapies have exhibited a high efficacy when it comes to itch control, itch control with PsO therapies is not as well documented. Objectives The aim of this post‐hoc analysis is to better understand the impact of itch on the patients' quality of life in PsO as well as AD by providing a pairwise correlation between itch improvement and patients' quality of life and determine the predictive factors in patients achieving Dermatology Life Quality Index score of 0 or 1 [DLQI (0/1)]. Methods Three phase III clinical studies, one in PsO and two in AD, were assessed. Pairwise correlations between objective improvement of visible signs of disease, quality of life, and itch intensity were investigated at 16 weeks of treatment. Predictive analyses methods were applied on the data to assess the impact of clinical and itch improvement on the DLQI improvement. Results This study shows that change in itch from baseline in AD and PsO patients correlate to change in DLQI from baseline. Change in itch from baseline was found to be the most important factor in predicting DLQI (0/1). Conclusions These results highlight the necessity to study itch in both PsO and AD clinical trials, and it is recommended that itch may be considered a coprimary or at minimum a secondary efficacy end‐point in all such clinical studies.

Purpose Currently, in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) there is a lack of evidence demonstrating optimal biologic treatment response with respect to disease duration. The aim of this post-hoc analysis, using real world data from the Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO), is to provide evidence if early intervention with biologics is associated with better treatment outcomes and if there is any difference among drug classes or individual biologics.Materials and methods For this post-hoc analysis patients were categorised into two subgroups according to shorter (≤2 years) or longer (>2 years) disease duration. Analysis was performed on anti-interleukin (IL)-17A cohort vs other biologics cohort, anti-IL-17A vs other drug classes, and pairwise comparisons of ixekizumab vs individual biologics, provided that the statistical models converged. Analysis investigated the association of disease duration with the proportion of patients achieving 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index score (PASI 100) at week 12. Adjusted comparative analyses, reported as odds ratio (OR), were performed using Frequentist Model Averaging (FMA) for each cohort or treatments within each subcategory of the subgroups.Results At week 12, anti-IL-17A and other biologics cohorts displayed minimal differences in numerical response rate for PASI 100 with respect to disease duration. The anti-IL-17A cohort showed a higher numerical PASI 100 response rate compared to the other biologic cohort irrespective of disease duration (≤2 years: 36.7% vs 21.8%; >2 years: 35.8% vs 21.9%).Conclusion Overall, the results do not clearly indicate that treating patients early is critical in achieving optimal patient outcomes. Furthermore, patients treated with ixekizumab show numerically higher response rates relative to other individual biologics irrespective of disease duration.

Abstract Introduction Nail psoriasis is highly prevalent among patients with psoriasis yet remains one of the most challenging areas to treat. To better understand the treatment landscape for psoriatic nail disease, more studies are needed that compare the effectiveness of different biologics for patients with nail psoriasis. This study contributes to this objective by directly comparing the effectiveness of approved biologics in improving nail psoriasis for patients up to month 12 in a real-world setting. Methods Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO) is an ongoing 3-year, prospective, non-interventional cohort study of adults with chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis initiating or switching to a new biologic. This study assessed the change in modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) score from baseline to months 3, 6 and 12 for 763 patients and compared the effectiveness of anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics versus other approved biologics, as well as ixekizumab versus secukinumab, guselkumab, risankizumab and adalimumab. Comparative adjusted analyses used frequentist model averaging (FMA). Least square mean difference (LSMD) in mNAPSI scores are presented as observed. Results Irrespective of the severity of nail psoriasis at baseline, the anti-IL-17A cohort had greater mean mNAPSI reductions from baseline compared to the other biologics cohort through month 12, reaching significance at months 3 and 6 in the adjusted analysis. For patients with moderate-to-severe nail psoriasis, ixekizumab showed numerically higher mean reductions in mNAPSI scores compared to all other studied biologics, reaching significance versus guselkumab at all timepoints and risankizumab at month 6. Conclusion This real-world study showed that patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and any severity of concomitant nail involvement had significantly faster and more substantial improvements in nail psoriasis up to month 6 in the anti-IL-17A cohort compared to the other biologics cohort. Of the individual biologics studied, ixekizumab showed the highest numerical improvements in nail psoriasis at month 12. Trial registration EUPAS24207.

Despite the abundance of data concerning biologic treatments for patients with psoriasis, clinicians are often challenged with discerning the optimal treatment for each patient. To inform this selection, this study explored whether a patient’s baseline characteristics or disease profile could predict the likelihood of achieving complete skin clearance with biologic treatment. Machine-learning and other statistical methods were applied to the substantial data collected from patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the ongoing, international, prospective, observational Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO). The 3 measures of complete skin clearance were a psoriasis area and severity index (PASI)100 response at (a) week 12, (b) month 12, and (c) week 12 and maintain ed at month 6 and month 12 (PASI100 durability). From these real-world data, the absence of nail psoriasis emerged as the most consistent feature that may be used by clinicians to predict high-level treatment responses with biologic treatment. Other significant predictors of skin clearance with biologic treatments were the absence of hypertension and a lower body surface area affected by psoriasis. Overall, this study evidences the substantial challenge of identifying reliable clinical markers of treatment response for patients with psoriasis and highlights the importance of regular screening for psoriatic nail involvement.

Abstract Nail psoriasis is a difficult-to-treat manifestation of psoriatic disease affecting up to 80% of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and 40–60% of patients with plaque psoriasis (PsO). Ixekizumab (IXE), a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin-17A, is approved for the treatment of patients with PsA and patients with moderate-to-severe PsO. This narrative review aims to summarize nail psoriasis data generated from IXE clinical trials in patients with PsA (SPIRIT-P1, SPIRIT-P2, and SPIRIT-H2H) and/or moderate-to-severe PsO (UNCOVER-1, -2, -3, IXORA-R, IXORA-S, and IXORA-PEDS) with an emphasis on head-to-head clinical trial data. Across numerous trials explored, IXE treatment was associated with greater improvement in resolution of nail disease versus comparators at week 24, results which were maintained up to and beyond week 52. Additionally, patients experienced higher rates of resolution of nail disease versus comparators at week 24 and maintained high levels of resolution up to week 52 and beyond. In both PsA and PsO, IXE demonstrated efficacy in treating nail psoriasis, and therefore may be an effective therapy option. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier UNCOVER-1 (NCT01474512), UNCOVER-2 (NCT01597245), UNCOVER-3 (NCT01646177), IXORA-PEDS (NCT03073200), IXORA-S (NCT02561806), IXORA-R (NCT03573323), SPIRIT-P1 (NCT01695239), SPIRIT-P2 (NCT02349295), SPIRIT-H2H (NCT03151551).

Background Available network meta-analyses (NMAs) comparing the efficacy of biologics in nail psoriasis (NP) have not included recently approved biologics such as bimekizumab nor have they provided comparisons up to 1 year. Objective We conducted two NMAs that update and extend results from a previous NMA comparing biologics for achieving complete resolution of NP. Methods Bayesian NMAs were performed using a generalized linear model with a logit link to model the binary outcome of nail clearance at weeks 24–28 and 48–52. Results For the NMA at weeks 24–28, which included seven biologics and placebo, the absolute probability of achieving complete resolution of NP was highest for ixekizumab (46.4%; 95% credibility interval [CrI] 35.2–58.0), followed by brodalumab (37.1%; 95% CrI 17.1–62.2) and bimekizumab (30.3%; 95% CrI 12.7–53.9). For the NMA at weeks 48–52, which included six biologics, the absolute probability was highest for ixekizumab (77.2%; 95% CrI 51.1–93.4), followed by adalimumab (75.6%; 95% CrI 61.5–87.3) and brodalumab (71.9%; 95% CrI 38.4–93.2). Conclusion Among biologics included in these two NMAs, ixekizumab has the highest absolute probability of achieving complete resolution of NP. Results may help to inform treatment decisions for patients with NP.

Objectives To describe the results of a structured literature review of real-world outcomes with ixekizumab in patients with psoriasis (PsO) and/or psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Methods Literature databases, conference proceedings and additional sources were searched for relevant publications. Real-world studies of ≥25 ixekizumab-treated patients with PsO and/or PsA were included. Data on clinical effectiveness, treatment persistence/patterns, economic outcomes, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and safety were extracted. Results Fifty-one publications were included. Most studies focused on patients with PsO, and the number of publications with a focus on PROs was low. Studies of treatment patterns found that in general, ixekizumab had similar or better persistence versus other biologics, and rates or risk of switching similar to or less than comparator drugs. Adherence to ixekizumab was high, and patients were less likely to discontinue ixekizumab than other biologics. Ixekizumab was effective in the real world, with a safety profile consistent with that reported in clinical trials. Conclusions Real-world use of ixekizumab in PsO and PsA is effective and safe, with generally high treatment persistence and adherence. Further work is required to determine the impact of ixekizumab on PROs in PsO, and to gather more data on real-world use of ixekizumab in PsA.

IntroductionPsoriasis localized at the scalp, face, nails, genitalia, palms, and soles can exacerbate the disease burden. Real-world studies comparing the effectiveness of treatments for these special areas are limited.MethodsPsoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO) is an international, prospective, non-interventional, study comparing the effectiveness of anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics (ixekizumab and secukinumab) compared to other approved biologics and the pairwise comparative effectiveness of ixekizumab relative to five other individual biologics for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. To determine special area involvement, physicians answered binary questions at baseline and week 12. The proportion of patients who achieved special area clearance at week 12 was assessed. Missing outcome data were imputed as non-response. Comparative treatment analyses were conducted using frequentist model averaging.ResultsOf the 1,978 patients included, 83.4% had at least one special area involved at baseline with the scalp (66.7%) as the most frequently affected part, followed by nails (37.9%), face/neck (36.9%), genitalia (25.6%), and palms and/or soles (22.2%). Patients with scalp, nail, or genital, but not palmoplantar or face/neck psoriasis, had significantly higher odds of achieving clearance at week 12 in the anti-IL-17A cohort compared to the other biologics cohort. Patients with scalp psoriasis had a 10–20% higher response rate and significantly greater odds (1.8–2.3) of achieving clearance at week 12 with ixekizumab compared to included biologics.ConclusionBiologics demonstrate a high level of clearance of special areas at week 12 in a real-world setting. Patients with scalp, nail, or genital involvement have significantly higher odds of clearance at week 12 with anti-IL-17A biologics compared to other biologics.

Abstract Background Indirect comparisons (including network meta‐analyses [NMAs]) allow us to compare benefits and risks of multiple interventions for the same clinical condition when head‐to‐head comparisons are not feasible. Objective To provide guidance to the clinical community on better understanding indirect comparison methods to help them to interpret their results by applying two quality standards to published indirect comparisons of systemic biologics for moderate to severe psoriasis. Methods A systematic literature review (SLR) of published indirect comparisons of biologics for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis in adults was conducted. Data extraction was performed using a predefined subset of NICE TSD7 (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technical Support Document 7) checklist questions and methods used to perform each analysis were descriptively compared. Methodological quality of the SLR underlying each indirect comparison was assessed using AMSTAR 2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews version 2). Results Twenty‐two NMAs and four adjusted indirect comparisons (AICs) were identified. Although there were some similarities, for example, application of Bayesian random‐effects models, several important methodological aspects varied considerably across NMAs identified, for example, classes of drugs, number of treatments and studies included, reporting and handling of different doses, and reporting of both checks for and investigations of inconsistency. Methodological comparisons across AICs were limited by the small number. The quality of most underlying SLRs described, assessed as overall level of confidence in the results, was ‘critically low’. Conclusions Understanding that there are different methodologies employed to answer differing research questions is key to helping clinicians to interpret the indirect evidence currently available in psoriasis.

ObjectivePatients with psoriasis have an increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes when compared to the general population. Research suggests that type 2 diabetes (T2D) as well as obesity may have an impact on patients' response to treatment. This post-hoc analysis reports the efficacy of ixekizumab in treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis in patients with prediabetes or T2D.Method and materialsUNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2, and UNCOVER-3 were three Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Patients were aged ≥18 years with chronic moderate-to-severe psoriasis (defined as ≥10% body surface area affected, static Physician Global Assessment ≥3, and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] ≥12 at screening and baseline) who were candidates for phototherapy or systemic therapy. UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2, and UNCOVER-3 participants received ixekizumab as per label (that is, an initial dose of two subcutaneous injections [160 mg in total] at Week 0, followed by 80 mg every 2 weeks through Week 12 and 80 mg every 4 weeks thereafter through Week 60).ResultsThe proportions of patients with prediabetes, T2D and normoglycemia that achieved PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100 at Week 60 were similar. Results suggest that patients with T2D were slower to achieve PASI100 than patients with prediabetes or those with normoglycemia. Ixekizumab had no effect on any metabolic markers in patients receiving the treatment.ConclusionsDespite the higher rate of obesity and extreme obesity in patients with prediabetes and T2D, ixekizumab was an efficacious treatment in treating patients with psoriasis.

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder associated with a heterogeneous presentation and considerable disease burden. Exploring atopic dermatitis treatment patterns and patient benefits could improve disease management and patients’ quality of life. This study aimed to describe current and previous atopic dermatitis treatment patterns and patient benefits from those treatments to inform disease management. Data were collected in 10 countries. Adults (n = 1,988) with confirmed moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis completed a web-based cross-sectional survey. Most patients (86.6%) had body surface area involvement

Nail psoriasis is a chronic, difficult-to-treat condition affecting almost half of patients with psoriasis. It is associated with considerable social stigma and impairment of patients’ quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess improvements in objective measures of nail psoriasis among patients from the long-term extension of the UNCOVER-3 study who received the interleukin-17A inhibitor ixekizumab and had either any degree of nail psoriasis (Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) >=1) or significant nail psoriasis (fingernail NAPSI ≥ 16 and ≥ 4 fingernails involved) at baseline. Efficacy outcomes reported through week 264 included the mean percentage improvements from baseline in NAPSI score and the proportion of patients achieving nail psoriasis resolution (NAPSI=0). In UNCOVER-3, 56.9% (219/385) of patients had nail psoriasis at baseline; of those, 61.2% (134/219) had significant nail psoriasis. At week 60, a total of 66.9% and 59.1% of patients with baseline nail psoriasis and significant baseline nail psoriasis, respectively, reported complete clearance of nail psoriasis, an effect which was sustained through week 264. This analysis demonstrates that continuous treatment with ixekizumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe-psoriasis through 264 weeks was associated with improvements and clearance of fingernail psoriasis, irrespective of the severity of nail psoriasis at baseline.

Introduction: The randomised, open-label, assessor-blinded, parallel-group SPIRIT-H2H trial (NCT03151551) demonstrated superiority of ixekizumab over adalimumab in simultaneously achieving improvement in joint symptoms (American College of Rheumatology [ACR]50) and clearance of skin lesions (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI]100) in biologic-naïve patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and plaque psoriasis (PsO) at Week 24. Additionally, this higher efficacy of ixekizumab versus adalimumab was maintained through Week 52. Objectives: This analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and adalimumab in the subgroup of patients with PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO through W52. Methods: Efficacy and safety outcomes were analysed in patients with PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO (PASI ≥12, Body Surface Area ≥10%, static Physician Global Assessment ≥3) through W52. Categorical and continuous outcomes were analysed using logistic regression models and mixed model for repeated measures, respectively. Results: More ixekizumab- versus adalimumab-treated patients simultaneously achieved PASI100 and ACR50 at W24 (40.8% versus 17.6%, p=0.015) and W52 (38.8% versus 17.6%, p=0.026). Likewise, more ixekizumab- versus adalimumab-treated patients achieved PASI100 (59.2% versus 25.5%, p=0.001) and PASI90 (81.6% versus 60.8%, p=0.028) through W52, and nail PsO clearance at W24. Joint symptom improvements were comparable between treatment groups. No new safety findings were reported. Conclusions: Ixekizumab had higher efficacy than adalimumab in simultaneous achievement of ACR50 and PASI100 at W24 and W52 in patients with PsA and moderate-to-severe PsO. Ixekizumab-treated patients also showed higher response rates for nail PsO clearance and for reporting minimal or no impact on quality of life at Week 24.

In clinical practice, interruption of treatment may not result in immediate cessation of disease control, and some patients even experience sustained treatment response following treatment interruption. This post hoc analysis of UNCOVER-1 and -2 Phase 3 clinical trials characterized the time to loss of treatment response in patients with psoriasis who responded to ixekizumab through a 12-week treatment period, and who were then re-randomized to placebo for the following 48 weeks. For those with static Physician Global Assessment [sPGA]0/1 and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI]90 at Week 12, the median time to loss of PASI90 was 16.1 weeks (95% confidence interval 12.7–16.4). For those with PASI100 at Week 12, the median time to loss of PASI100 was 12.1 weeks (95% confidence interval 9.0–13.0). A small subset of patients maintained high levels of disease control through Week 60. This study adds to the growing body of evidence on sustained treatment response following treatment interruption.

Abstract is missing (Short communication)

Various autoantibodies are detected more frequently in HIV-infected individuals than in HIV-negative controls; however, limited data exist regarding autoimmune blistering skin diseases. Using enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) and indirect immunofluore­scence, no difference in the frequency and magnitude of autoantibodies against BP180, BP230, desmoglein 1 and 3 was found between 594 HIV-infected patients and 248 uninfected controls in this cross-sectional study (16.0% vs. 11.7%, respectively, for at least one positive ELISA, p = 0.11). Interestingly, reactive syphilis serology in both HIV-infected individuals and uninfected controls was associated with positive anti-BP180 ELISA results (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07–4.29, p = 0.03 and OR 4.70, CI 1.3–16.86; p = 0.0180). Our study shows a comparably low prevalence of cutaneous autoantibodies in both HIV-infected patients and uninfected controls lacking signs of autoimmune blistering skin disease. Positive BP180 ELISA in the absence of clinical signs of bullous pemphigoid should prompt further evaluation for syphilis antibodies.