Search

PurposeRecent deep-learning based synthetic computed tomography (sCT) generation using magnetic resonance (MR) images have shown promising results. However, generating sCT for the abdominal region poses challenges due to the patient motion, including respiration and peristalsis. To address these challenges, this study investigated an unsupervised learning approach using a transformer-based cycle-GAN with structure-preserving loss for abdominal cancer patients.MethodA total of 120 T2 MR images scanned by 1.5 T Unity MR-Linac and their corresponding CT images for abdominal cancer patient were collected. Patient data were aligned using rigid registration. The study employed a cycle-GAN architecture, incorporating the modified Swin-UNETR as a generator. Modality-independent neighborhood descriptor (MIND) loss was used for geometric consistency. Image quality was compared between sCT and planning CT, using metrics including mean absolute error (MAE), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structure similarity index measure (SSIM) and Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. Dosimetric evaluation was evaluated between sCT and planning CT, using gamma analysis and relative dose volume histogram differences for each organ-at-risks, utilizing treatment plan. A comparison study was conducted between original, Swin-UNETR-only, MIND-only, and proposed cycle-GAN.ResultsThe MAE, PSNR, SSIM and KL divergence of original cycle-GAN and proposed method were 86.1 HU, 26.48 dB, 0.828, 0.448 and 79.52 HU, 27.05 dB, 0.845, 0.230, respectively. The MAE and PSNR were statistically significant. The global gamma passing rates of the proposed method at 1%/1 mm, 2%/2 mm, and 3%/3 mm were 86.1 ± 5.9%, 97.1 ± 2.7%, and 98.9 ± 1.0%, respectively.ConclusionThe proposed method significantly improves image metric of sCT for the abdomen patients than original cycle-GAN. Local gamma analysis was slightly higher for proposed method. This study showed the improvement of sCT using transformer and structure preserving loss even with the complex anatomy of the abdomen.

Due to anatomical changes between pre-planning and implantation, there exists a need for tools that can streamline the adjustment of needle and seed configurations in low dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Specifically, upon taking a second ultrasound on the day of treatment, the distribution of seeds and needles will differ drastically from the original plan. Clinics that employ this method must then spend time and resources to generate a workflow to manipulate the original configuration to the new configuration. ONCOSEED extracts data from VariSeed treatment plans, calculating a labor score (LScore) to optimize adjustments to needle configurations. A case study of three simulated VariSeed treatment plans was used to compare the ONCOSEED software to the manual method of generating a workflow. In the same method that was used at the authors’ clinic, several assistants annotated by hand the original plan to convert it to the new plan. The time taken to do so was recorded and compared to the runtime of the software when generating a workflow for the same plan. Results showed that ONCOSEED was on average 28 times faster than generating a workflow by hand. ONCOSEED enhances the efficiency of seed replacement in LDR brachytherapy, promoting the adoption of adaptive brachytherapy practices.

Purpose: Herein, we developed a deep learning algorithm to improve the segmentation of the clinical target volume (CTV) on daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans in breast cancer radiation therapy. By leveraging the Intentional Deep Overfit Learning (IDOL) framework, we aimed to enhance personalized image-guided radiation therapy based on patient-specific learning. Methods and Materials: We used 240 CBCT scans from 100 breast cancer patients and employed a 2-stage training approach. The first stage involved training a novel general deep learning model (Swin UNETR, UNET, and SegResNET) on 90 patients. The second stage used intentional overfitting on the remaining 10 patients for patient-specific CBCT outputs. Quantitative evaluation was conducted using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff Distance (HD), mean surface distance (MSD), and independent samples t test with expert contours on CBCT scans from the first to 15th fractions. Results: IDOL integration significantly improved CTV segmentation, particularly with the Swin UNETR model (P values < .05). Using patient-specific data, IDOL enhanced the DSC, HD, and MSD metrics. The average DSC for the 15th fraction improved from 0.9611 to 0.9819, the average HD decreased from 4.0118 mm to 1.3935 mm, and the average MSD decreased from 0.8723 to 0.4603. Incorporating CBCT scans from the initial treatments and first to third fractions further improved results, with an average DSC of 0.9850, an average HD of 1.2707 mm, and an average MSD of 0.4076 for the 15th fraction, closely aligning with physician-drawn contours. Conclusion: Compared with a general model, our patient-specific deep learning-based training algorithm significantly improved CTV segmentation accuracy of CBCT scans in patients with breast cancer. This approach, coupled with continuous deep learning training using daily CBCT scans, demonstrated enhanced CTV delineation accuracy and efficiency. Future studies should explore the adaptability of the IDOL framework to diverse deep learning models, data sets, and cancer sites.

Purpose: To quantify interobserver variation (IOV) in target volume and organs-at-risk (OAR) contouring across 31 institutions in breast cancer cases and to explore the clinical utility of deep learning (DL)-based auto-contouring in reducing potential IOV. Methods and materials: In phase 1, two breast cancer cases were randomly selected and distributed to multiple institutions for contouring six clinical target volumes (CTVs) and eight OAR. In Phase 2, auto-contour sets were generated using a previously published DL Breast segmentation model and were made available for all participants. The difference in IOV of submitted contours in phases 1 and 2 was investigated quantitatively using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD). The qualitative analysis involved using contour heat maps to visualize the extent and location of these variations and the required modification. Results: Over 800 pairwise comparisons were analysed for each structure in each case. Quantitative phase 2 metrics showed significant improvement in the mean DSC (from 0.69 to 0.77) and HD (from 34.9 to 17.9 mm). Quantitative analysis showed increased interobserver agreement in phase 2, specifically for CTV structures (5–19 %), leading to fewer manual adjustments. Underlying IOV differences causes were reported using a questionnaire and hierarchical clustering analysis based on the volume of CTVs. Conclusion: DL-based auto-contours improved the contour agreement for OARs and CTVs significantly, both qualitatively and quantitatively, suggesting its potential role in minimizing radiation therapy protocol deviation.

Abstract Background Adjuvant radiation therapy improves the overall survival and loco-regional control in patients with breast cancer. However, radiation-induced heart disease, which occurs after treatment from incidental radiation exposure to the cardiac organ, is an emerging challenge. This study aimed to generate synthetic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (SCECT) from non-contrast CT (NCT) using deep learning (DL) and investigate its role in contouring cardiac substructures. We also aimed to determine its applicability for a retrospective study on the substructure volume-dose relationship for predicting radiation-induced heart disease. Methods We prepared NCT-CECT cardiac scan pairs of 59 patients. Of these, 35, 4, and 20 pairs were used for training, validation, and testing, respectively. We adopted conditional generative adversarial network as a framework to generate SCECT. SCECT was validated in the following three stages: (1) The similarity between SCECT and CECT was evaluated; (2) Manual contouring was performed on SCECT and CECT with sufficient intervals and based on this, the geometric similarity of cardiac substructures was measured between them; (3) The treatment plan was quantitatively analyzed based on the contours of SCECT and CECT. Results While the mean values (± standard deviation) of the mean absolute error, peak signal-to-noise ratio, and structural similarity index measure between SCECT and CECT were 20.66 ± 5.29, 21.57 ± 1.85, and 0.77 ± 0.06, those were 23.95 ± 6.98, 20.67 ± 2.34, and 0.76 ± 0.07 between NCT and CECT, respectively. The Dice similarity coefficients and mean surface distance between the contours of SCECT and CECT were 0.81 ± 0.06 and 2.44 ± 0.72, respectively. The dosimetry analysis displayed error rates of 0.13 ± 0.27 Gy and 0.71 ± 1.34% for the mean heart dose and V5Gy, respectively. Conclusion Our findings displayed the feasibility of SCECT generation from NCT and its potential for cardiac substructure delineation in patients who underwent breast radiation therapy.

Abstract Purpose To study the performance of a proposed deep learning-based autocontouring system in delineating organs at risk (OARs) in breast radiotherapy with a group of experts. Methods Eleven experts from two institutions delineated nine OARs in 10 cases of adjuvant radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery. Autocontours were then provided to the experts for correction. Overall, 110 manual contours, 110 corrected autocontours, and 10 autocontours of each type of OAR were analyzed. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) were used to compare the degree of agreement between the best manual contour (chosen by an independent expert committee) and each autocontour, corrected autocontour, and manual contour. Higher DSCs and lower HDs indicated a better geometric overlap. The amount of time reduction using the autocontouring system was examined. User satisfaction was evaluated using a survey. Results Manual contours, corrected autocontours, and autocontours had a similar accuracy in the average DSC value (0.88 vs. 0.90 vs. 0.90). The accuracy of autocontours ranked the second place, based on DSCs, and the first place, based on HDs among the manual contours. Interphysician variations among the experts were reduced in corrected autocontours, compared to variations in manual contours (DSC: 0.89–0.90 vs. 0.87–0.90; HD: 4.3–5.8 mm vs. 5.3–7.6 mm). Among the manual delineations, the breast contours had the largest variations, which improved most significantly with the autocontouring system. The total mean times for nine OARs were 37 min for manual contours and 6 min for corrected autocontours. The results of the survey revealed good user satisfaction. Conclusions The autocontouring system had a similar performance in OARs as that of the experts’ manual contouring. This system can be valuable in improving the quality of breast radiotherapy and reducing interphysician variability in clinical practice.

Abstract Background In breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy (RT), accurate target delineation and reduction of radiation doses to the nearby normal organs is important. However, manual clinical target volume (CTV) and organs-at-risk (OARs) segmentation for treatment planning increases physicians’ workload and inter-physician variability considerably. In this study, we evaluated the potential benefits of deep learning-based auto-segmented contours by comparing them to manually delineated contours for breast cancer patients. Methods CTVs for bilateral breasts, regional lymph nodes, and OARs (including the heart, lungs, esophagus, spinal cord, and thyroid) were manually delineated on planning computed tomography scans of 111 breast cancer patients who received breast-conserving surgery. Subsequently, a two-stage convolutional neural network algorithm was used. Quantitative metrics, including the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff distance, and qualitative scoring by two panels from 10 institutions were used for analysis. Inter-observer variability and delineation time were assessed; furthermore, dose-volume histograms and dosimetric parameters were also analyzed using another set of patient data. Results The correlation between the auto-segmented and manual contours was acceptable for OARs, with a mean DSC higher than 0.80 for all OARs. In addition, the CTVs showed favorable results, with mean DSCs higher than 0.70 for all breast and regional lymph node CTVs. Furthermore, qualitative subjective scoring showed that the results were acceptable for all CTVs and OARs, with a median score of at least 8 (possible range: 0–10) for (1) the differences between manual and auto-segmented contours and (2) the extent to which auto-segmentation would assist physicians in clinical practice. The differences in dosimetric parameters between the auto-segmented and manual contours were minimal. Conclusions The feasibility of deep learning-based auto-segmentation in breast RT planning was demonstrated. Although deep learning-based auto-segmentation cannot be a substitute for radiation oncologists, it is a useful tool with excellent potential in assisting radiation oncologists in the future. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.

Purpose: This study was conducted to develop a deep learning-based automatic segmentation (DLBAS) model of head and neck organs for radiotherapy (RT) in dogs, and to evaluate the feasibility for delineating the RT planning.Materials and Methods: The segmentation indicated that there were potentially 15 organs at risk (OARs) in the head and neck of dogs. Post-contrast computed tomography (CT) was performed in 90 dogs. The training and validation sets comprised 80 CT data sets, including 20 test sets. The accuracy of the segmentation was assessed using both the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the Hausdorff distance (HD), and by referencing the expert contours as the ground truth. An additional 10 clinical test sets with relatively large displacement or deformation of organs were selected for verification in cancer patients. To evaluate the applicability in cancer patients, and the impact of expert intervention, three methods–HA, DLBAS, and the readjustment of the predicted data obtained via the DLBAS of the clinical test sets (HA_DLBAS)–were compared.Results: The DLBAS model (in the 20 test sets) showed reliable DSC and HD values; it also had a short contouring time of ~3 s. The average (mean ± standard deviation) DSC (0.83 ± 0.04) and HD (2.71 ± 1.01 mm) values were similar to those of previous human studies. The DLBAS was highly accurate and had no large displacement of head and neck organs. However, the DLBAS in the 10 clinical test sets showed lower DSC (0.78 ± 0.11) and higher HD (4.30 ± 3.69 mm) values than those of the test sets. The HA_DLBAS was comparable to both the HA (DSC: 0.85 ± 0.06 and HD: 2.74 ± 1.18 mm) and DLBAS presented better comparison metrics and decreased statistical deviations (DSC: 0.94 ± 0.03 and HD: 2.30 ± 0.41 mm). In addition, the contouring time of HA_DLBAS (30 min) was less than that of HA (80 min).Conclusion: In conclusion, HA_DLBAS method and the proposed DLBAS was highly consistent and robust in its performance. Thus, DLBAS has great potential as a single or supportive tool to the key process in RT planning.

Differentiating the invasiveness of ground-glass nodules (GGN) is clinically important, and several institutions have attempted to develop their own solutions by using computed tomography images. The purpose of this study is to evaluate Computer-Aided Analysis of Risk Yield (CANARY), a validated virtual biopsy and risk-stratification machine-learning tool for lung adenocarcinomas, in a Korean patient population. To this end, a total of 380 GGNs from 360 patients who underwent pulmonary resection in a single institution were reviewed. Based on the Score Indicative of Lung Cancer Aggression (SILA), a quantitative indicator of CANARY analysis results, all of the GGNs were classified as "indolent" (atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, adenocarcinomas in situ, or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma) or "invasive" (invasive adenocarcinoma) and compared with the pathology reports. By considering the possibility of uneven class distribution, statistical analysis was performed on the 1) entire cohort and 2) randomly extracted six sets of class-balanced samples. For each trial, the optimal cutoff SILA was obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curve. The classification results were evaluated using several binary classification metrics. Of a total of 380 GGNs, the mean SILA for 65 (17.1%) indolent and 315 (82.9%) invasive lesions were 0.195±0.124 and 0.391±0.208 (p < 0.0001). The area under the curve (AUC) of each trial was 0.814 and 0.809, with an optimal threshold SILA of 0.229 for both. The macro F1-score and geometric mean were found to be 0.675 and 0.745 for the entire cohort, while both scored 0.741 in the class-equalized dataset. From these results, CANARY could be confirmed acceptable in classifying GGN for Korean patients after the cutoff SILA was calibrated. We found that adjusting the cutoff SILA is needed to use CANARY in other countries or races, and geometric mean could be more objective than F1-score or AUC in the binary classification of imbalanced data.

Background: While atlas segmentation (AS) has proven to be a time-saving and promising method for radiation therapy contouring, optimal methods for its use have not been well-established. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between the size of the atlas patient population and the atlas segmentation auto contouring (AC) performance.Methods: A total of 110 patients' head planning CT images were selected. The mandible and thyroid were selected for this study. The mandibles and thyroids of the patient population were carefully segmented by two skilled clinicians. Of the 110 patients, 100 random patients were registered to 5 different atlas libraries as atlas patients, in groups of 20 to 100, with increments of 20. AS was conducted for each of the remaining 10 patients, either by simultaneous atlas segmentation (SAS) or independent atlas segmentation (IAS). The AS duration of each target patient was recorded. To validate the accuracy of the generated contours, auto contours were compared to manually generated contours (MC) using a volume-overlap-dependent metric, Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), and a distance-dependent metric, Hausdorff Distance (HD).Results: In both organs, as the population increased from n = 20 to n = 60, the results showed better convergence. Generally, independent cases produced better performance than simultaneous cases. For the mandible, the best performance was achieved by n = 60 [DSC = 0.92 (0.01) and HD = 6.73 (1.31) mm] and the worst by n = 100 [DSC = 0.90 (0.03) and HD = 10.10 (6.52) mm] atlas libraries. Similar results were achieved with the thyroid; the best performance was achieved by n = 60 [DSC = 0.79 (0.06) and HD = 10.17 (2.89) mm] and the worst by n = 100 [DSC = 0.72 (0.13) and HD = 12.88 (3.94) mm] atlas libraries. Both IAS and SAS showed similar results. Manual contouring of the mandible and thyroid required an average of 1,044 (±170.15) seconds, while AS required an average of 46.4 (±2.8) seconds.Conclusions: The performance of AS AC generally increased as the population of the atlas library increased. However, the performance does not drastically vary in the larger atlas libraries in contrast to the logic that bigger atlas library should lead to better results. In fact, the results do not vary significantly toward the larger atlas library. It is necessary for the institutions to independently research the optimal number of subjects.

Purpose: Online adaptive radiotherapy (ART) requires accurate and efficient auto-segmentation of target volumes and organs-at-risk (OARs) in mostly conebeam computed tomography (CBCT) images, which often have severe artifacts and lack soft-tissue contrast, making direct segmentation very challenging. Propagating expert-drawn contours from the pretreatment planning CT through traditional or deep learning (DL)-based deformable image registration (DIR) can achieve improved results in many situations. Typical DL-based DIR models are population based, that is, trained with a dataset for a population of patients, and so they may be affected by the generalizability problem. Methods: In this paper, we propose a method called test-time optimization (TTO) to refine a pretrained DL-based DIR population model, first for each individual test patient, and then progressively for each fraction of online ART treatment. Our proposed method is less susceptible to the generalizability problem and thus can improve overall performance of different DL-based DIR models by improving model accuracy, especially for outliers. Our experiments used data from 239 patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma to test the proposed method.First,we trained a population model with 200 patients and then applied TTO to the remaining 39 test patients by refining the trained population model to obtain 39 individualized models. We compared each of the individualized models with the population model in terms of segmentation accuracy. Results: The average improvement of the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) of segmentation can be up to 0.04 (5%) and 0.98 mm (25%), respectively, with the individualized models compared to the population model over 17 selected OARs and a target of 39 patients. Although the average improvement may seem mild, we found that the improvement for outlier patients with structures of large anatomical changes is significant. The number of patients with at least 0.05 DSC improvement or 2 mm HD95 improvement by TTO averaged over the 17 selected structures for the state-of -the-art architecture VoxelMorph is 10 out of 39 test patients. By deriving the individualized model using TTO from the pretrained population model, TTO models can be ready in about 1 min. We also generated the adapted fractional models for each of the 39 test patients by progressively refining the individualized models using TTO to CBCT images acquired at later fractions of online ART treatment. When adapting the individualized model to a later fraction of the same patient, the model can be ready in less than a minute with slightly improved accuracy. Conclusions: The proposed TTO method is well suited for online ART and can boost segmentation accuracy for DL-based DIR models, especially for outlier patients where the pretrained models fail. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has been performed to reduce locoregional failure (LRF) following radical cystectomy for locally advanced bladder cancer; however, its efficacy has not been well established. We analyzed the locoregional recurrence patterns of post-radical cystectomy to identify patients who could benefit from adjuvant RT and determine the optimal target volume. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 160 patients with stage = pT3 bladder cancer who were treated with radical cystectomy between January 2006 and December 2015. The impact of pathologic findings, including the stage, lympho-vascular invasion, perineural invasion, margin status, nodal involvement, and the number of nodes removed on failure patterns, was assessed. Results: Median follow-up period was 27.7 months. LRF was observed in 55 patients (34.3%), 12 of whom presented with synchronous local and regional failures as the first failure. The most common failure pattern was distant metastasis (40%). Among LRFs, the most common recurrence site was the cystectomy bed (15.6%). Patients with positive resection margins had a significantly higher recurrence rate compared to those without (28% vs. 10%, p=0.004). The pelvic nodal recurrence rate was < 5% in pN0 patients; the rate of recurrence in the external and common iliac nodes was 12.5% in pN+ patients. The rate of recurrence in the common iliac nodes was significantly higher in pN2-3 patients than in pN0-1 patients (15.2% vs. 4.4%, p=0.04). Conclusion: Pelvic RT could be beneficial especially for those with positive resection margins or nodal involvement after radical cystectomy. Radiation fields should be optimized based on the patient-specific risk factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]