1. Impact of Hydrometeorological Events for the Selection of Parametric Models for Protozoan Pathogens in Drinking‐Water Sources
- Author
-
Jean-Baptiste Burnet, P.W.M.H. Smeets, Michèle Prévost, Mounia Hachad, Émile Sylvestre, Gertjan Medema, Sarah Dorner, and Manuela Villion
- Subjects
Giardiasis ,Rain ,0211 other engineering and technologies ,Cryptosporidiosis ,Cryptosporidium ,02 engineering and technology ,010501 environmental sciences ,Poisson distribution ,Atmospheric sciences ,Risk Assessment ,01 natural sciences ,Water Purification ,symbols.namesake ,Rivers ,Snow ,Physiology (medical) ,Credible interval ,Gamma distribution ,Humans ,Hydrometeorology ,Cities ,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,Exposure assessment ,021110 strategic, defence & security studies ,Drinking Water ,Giardia ,Quebec ,Sampling (statistics) ,6. Clean water ,13. Climate action ,Snowmelt ,symbols ,Environmental science ,Water treatment ,Water Microbiology ,Environmental Monitoring - Abstract
Temporal variations in concentrations of pathogenic microorganisms in surface waters are well known to be influenced by hydrometeorological events. Reasonable methods for accounting for microbial peaks in the quantification of drinking water treatment requirements need to be addressed. Here, we applied a novel method for data collection and model validation to explicitly account for weather events (rainfall, snowmelt) when concentrations of pathogens are estimated in source water. Online in situ β-d-glucuronidase activity measurements were used to trigger sequential grab sampling of source water to quantify Cryptosporidium and Giardia concentrations during rainfall and snowmelt events at an urban and an agricultural drinking water treatment plant in Quebec, Canada. We then evaluate if mixed Poisson distributions fitted to monthly sampling data ( n = 30 samples) could accurately predict daily mean concentrations during these events. We found that using the gamma distribution underestimated high Cryptosporidium and Giardia concentrations measured with routine or event-based monitoring. However, the log-normal distribution accurately predicted these high concentrations. The selection of a log-normal distribution in preference to a gamma distribution increased the annual mean concentration by less than 0.1-log but increased the upper bound of the 95% credibility interval on the annual mean by about 0.5-log. Therefore, considering parametric uncertainty in an exposure assessment is essential to account for microbial peaks in risk assessment.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF