Search

Objective The insulinotropic effect of exogenous, intravenously infused glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is impaired in patients with type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effects of endogenous GIP in relation to glucose and bone metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes using a selective GIP receptor antagonist and hypothesized that the effects of endogenous GIP were preserved. Design A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Methods Ten patients with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes (mean±s.d.; HbA1c 52 ± 11 mmol/mol; BMI 32.5 ± 4.8 kg/m2) were included. We infused a selective GIP receptor antagonist, GIP(3-30)NH2 (1200 pmol/kg/min), or placebo (saline) during two separate, 230-min, standardized, liquid mixed meal tests followed by a meal ad libitum. Subcutaneous adipose tissue biopsies were analyzed. Results Compared with placebo, GIP(3-30)NH2 reduced postprandial insulin secretion (Δbaseline-subtracted area under the curve (bsAUC)C-peptide% ± s.e.m.; −14 ± 6%, P = 0.021) and peak glucagon (Δ% ± s.e.m.; −11 ± 6%, P = 0.046) but had no effect on plasma glucose (P = 0.692). Suppression of bone resorption (assessed by circulating carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks (CTX)) was impaired during GIP(3-30)NH2 infusion compared with placebo (ΔbsAUCCTX; ±s.e.m.; −4.9 ± 2 ng/mL × min, P = 0.005) corresponding to a ~50% reduction. Compared with placebo, GIP(3-30)NH2 did not affect plasma lipids, meal consumption ad libitum or adipose tissue triglyceride content. Conclusions Using a selective GIP receptor antagonist during a meal, we show that endogenous GIP increases postprandial insulin secretion with little effect on postprandial glycaemia but is important for postprandial bone homeostasis in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Obesity is one of the biggest health challenges of the 21st century, already affecting close to 700 million people worldwide, debilitating and shortening lives and costing billions of pounds in healthcare costs and loss of workability. Body weight homeostasis relies on complex biological mechanisms and the development of obesity occurs on a background of genetic susceptibility and an environment promoting increased caloric intake and reduced physical activity. The pathophysiology of common obesity links neuro-endocrine and metabolic disturbances with behavioural changes, genetics, epigenetics and cultural habits. Also, specific causes of obesity exist, including monogenetic diseases and iatrogenic causes. In this review, we provide an overview of obesity mechanisms in humans with a focus on energy homeostasis, endocrine regulation of food intake and eating behavior, as well as the most common specific causes of obesity.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is a gut hormone impacting glucose, lipid and bone metabolism through the GIP receptor (GIPR). The GIP system has key species differences complicating the translation of findings from rodent to human physiology. Furthermore, the effects of endogenous GIP in humans have been difficult to tease out due to the lack of a suitable GIPR antagonist. The naturally occurring GIP(3-30)NH2 has turned out to constitute a safe and efficacious GIPR antagonist for rodent and human use. To study GIP physiology, it is recommended to use the species-specific GIP(3-30)NH2 peptide sequence, and for human intravenous infusions, an antagonist:agonist ratio of a minimum of 600 with a 20min infusion time before the intervention of interest is recommended. Several studies using GIP(3-30)NH2 are coming, hopefully providing new insights into the physiology of GIP, the pathophysiologic involvement of GIP in several diseases and the therapeutic potential of the GIPR.

The Danish Poison Information Centre (DPIC) regularly receives inquiries about nursing home residents who have been exposed to a medication error. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to describe and discuss the types and consequences of these errors. Data were collected from 1 March 2018 to 31 March 2019. Registered data included characteristics of caller and resident, data related to the suspected medication error, risk assessment and recommendation. Consequences and clinical outcomes were assessed by follow-up telephone calls. Over the study period, the DPIC was consulted about 145 medication errors occurring at Danish nursing homes. The median number of substances administered by error was two (interquartile range 1-5). Hospitalization was recommended in 21% of cases. In one-third of the cases where consultation with the DPIC was done with the resident either on his/her way to or in hospital, hospitalization was found unnecessary, and the resident could have stayed in accustomed surroundings for observation. Follow-up demonstrated that very few medication errors had a severe outcome. This prospective study illustrates that consulting with a poison information centre can qualify risk assessment and potentially reduce hospital admissions following medication errors in a nursing home setting.

The glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) fragment GIP(3-30)NH2 is a selective, competitive GIP receptor antagonist, and doses of 800 to 1200 pmol/kg/min inhibit GIP-induced potentiation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion by >80% in humans. We evaluated the effects of GIP(3-30)NH2 across a wider dose range in eight healthy men undergoing six separate and randomized 10-mmol/L hyperglycaemic clamps (A-F) with concomitant intravenous infusion of GIP (1.5 pmol/kg/min; A-E) or saline (F). Clamps A to E involved double-blinded, infusions of saline (A) and GIP(3-30)NH2 at four rates: 2 (B), 20 (C), 200 (D) and 2000 pmol/kg/min (E), respectively. Mean plasma concentrations of glucose (A-F) and GIP (A-E) were similar. GIP-induced potentiation of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion was reduced by 44 ± 10% and 84 ± 10% during clamps D and E, respectively. Correspondingly, the amounts of glucose required to maintain the clamp during D and E were not different from F. GIP-induced suppression of bone resorption and increase in heart rate were lowered by clamps D and E. In conclusion, GIP(3-30)NH2 provides extensive, dose-dependent inhibition of the GIP receptor in humans, with most pronounced effects of the doses 200 to 2000 pmol/kg/min within the tested range.

Treatment guidelines for type 2 diabetes (T2D) recommend avoidance of hypoglycemia and less stringent glycemic control in older patients. We examined the relation of glycemic control to glucose-lowering medications use in a cohort of patients aged>80 years with a diagnosis of T2D and a hospital admission in the Capital Region of Denmark in 2012–2016. We extracted data on medication use, diagnoses, and biochemistry from the hospitals’ records. We identified 5,172 T2D patients with high degree of co-morbidity and where 17% had an HbA1c in the range recommended for frail, comorbid, older patients with type 2 diabetes (58–75 mmol/mol (7.5–9%)). Half of the patients (n = 2,575) had an HbA1c 1c-values 1c values 1c within the generally recommended glycemic targets. One third of patients did not meet the diagnostic criteria for T2D, and of the patients who were treated with glucose-lowering medications, one-fifth had HbA1c-values suggesting overtreatment.

With the rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D), there is a substantial interest in novel, glucose-lowering drugs that may complement existing treatment options. Imeglimin is an oral antidiabetic agent currently in clinical development.This review is based on a literature search using PubMed and Embase including all published manuscripts and presentations concerning imeglimin. Supplementary information was retrieved from the manufacturer's official webpage. Preclinical and clinical data are summarized with a focus on mechanisms of action as well as clinical efficacy and safety in T2D.Imeglimin's mode of action seems to be improved mitochondrial function in pancreatic beta cells leading to improved insulin secretion and lowering of plasma glucose levels. In clinical trials of up to 24 weeks, imeglimin in doses of 1,000-1,500 mg twice daily conferred modest reductions in glycates hemoglobin A1c of 6-11 mmol/mol (0.5-1.0%) (placebo-adjusted) as a monotherapy and 7 mmol/mol (0.6%) as an add-on therapy to metformin or sitagliptin in patients with T2D. Reported adverse effects were mainly gastrointestinal discomfort. The position of imeglimin among other pharmacotherapies in the treatment of T2D will be determined based on future studies more clearly outlining the safety and long-term cardiovascular effects.AUC: area under the curve; BID: twice daily; DPP-4: dipeptidyl peptidase 4; GLP-1R: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin A1c; HFHSD: high-fat high-sucrose diet; OAD: oral antidiabetic; OD: once daily; OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; PPAR-γ: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; PTP: permeability transition pore; SGLT-2: sodium-glucose transport protein 2; STZ: streptozotocin; T2D: type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE Dual incretin receptor agonists in clinical development have shown reductions in body weight and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes, but the impact of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor activation remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the effects of high-dose exogenous GIP on energy intake, energy expenditure, plasma glucose, and glucose-regulating hormones in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with a long-acting glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonist. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In a randomized, double-blind design, men with type 2 diabetes (n = 22, mean ± SEM HbA1c 6.8 ± 0.1% [51 ± 1.5 mmol/mol]) treated with metformin and long-acting GLP-1R agonists were subjected to two 5-h continuous infusions (separated by a washout period of ≥3 days): one with GIP (6 pmol/kg/min) and another with saline (placebo). After 60 min of infusion, a liquid mixed-meal test was performed, and after 270 min of infusion, an ad libitum meal was served for evaluation of energy intake (primary end point). RESULTS Energy intake was similar during GIP and placebo infusion (648 ± 74 kcal vs. 594 ± 55 kcal, respectively; P = 0.480), as were appetite measures and energy expenditure. Plasma glucagon and glucose were higher during GIP infusion compared with placebo infusion (P = 0.026 and P = 0.017) as assessed by area under the curve. CONCLUSIONS In patients with type 2 diabetes, GIP infusion on top of treatment with metformin and a long-acting GLP-1R agonist did not affect energy intake, appetite, or energy expenditure but increased plasma glucose compared with placebo. These results indicate no acute beneficial effects of combining GIP and GLP-1.

Background Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) has been suggested to stimulate the secretion of pancreatic polypeptide (PP), an islet hormone thought to regulate gut motility, appetite, and glycemia. Objective To determine whether human GIP1-42 (hGIP) stimulates PP secretion. Method As glycemia modulates the secretion of PP, we measured plasma PP concentrations from 2 studies in healthy men (n = 10) and in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) (n = 12), where hGIP1-42 had been administered intravenously during fasting glycemia, hyperglycemia (12 mmol/L), and insulin-induced hypoglycemia (targets: 2.5 mmol/L [healthy]; 3.5 mmol/L [T2D]). Porcine GIP1-42 (pGIP) was also infused intra-arterially in isolated porcine pancreata (n = 4). Results Mean fasting plasma glucose concentrations were approximately 5 mmol/L (healthy) and approximately 8 mmol/L (T2D). At fasting glycemia, PP concentrations were higher during intravenous hGIP1-42 infusion compared with saline in healthy men (mean [standard error of the mean, SEM], net incremental areas under the curves (iAUCs)[0-30min], 403 [116] vs –6 [57] pmol/L × min; P = 0.004) and in patients with T2D (905 [177] vs –96 [86] pmol/L × min; P = 0.009). During hyperglycemic clamping, mean [SEM] PP concentrations were significantly higher during hGIP1-42 infusion compared with saline in patients with T2D (771 [160] vs –183 [117] pmol/L × min; P = 0.001), but not in healthy individuals (–8 [86] vs –57 [53] pmol/L × min; P = 0.69). When plasma glucose levels were declining in response to exogenous insulin, mean [SEM] PP concentrations were higher during hGIP1-42 infusion compared with saline in healthy individuals (294 [88] vs –82 [53] pmol/L × min; P = 0.0025), but not significantly higher in patients with T2D (586 [314] vs –120 [53]; P = 0.070). At target hypoglycemia, PP levels surged in both groups during both hGIP1-42 and saline infusions. In isolated pancreata, pGIP1-42 increased mean [SEM] PP output in the pancreatic venous effluent (baseline vs infusion, 24[5] vs 79 [16] pmol/min x min; P = 0.044). Conclusion GIP1-42 increases plasma PP secretion in healthy individuals, patients with T2D, and isolated porcine pancreata. Hyperglycemia blunts the stimulatory effect of hGIP1-42 in healthy individuals, but not in patients with T2D.

Ensembl Genomes (http://www.ensemblgenomes.org) is an integrating resource for genome-scale data from non-vertebrate species, complementing the resources for vertebrate genomics developed in the context of the Ensembl project (http://www.ensembl.org). Together, the two resources provide a consistent set of interfaces to genomic data across the tree of life, including reference genome sequence, gene models, transcriptional data, genetic variation and comparative analysis. Data may be accessed via our website, online tools platform and programmatic interfaces, with updates made four times per year (in synchrony with Ensembl). Here, we provide an overview of Ensembl Genomes, with a focus on recent developments. These include the continued growth, more robust and reproducible sets of orthologues and paralogues, and enriched views of gene expression and gene function in plants. Finally, we report on our continued deeper integration with the Ensembl project, which forms a key part of our future strategy for dealing with the increasing quantity of available genome-scale data across the tree of life.

Aims/hypothesis: Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) reduces appetite and energy intake in humans, whereas the other incretin hormone, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), seems to have no effect on eating behaviour. Interestingly, studies in rodents have shown that concomitant activation of GIP and GLP-1 receptors may potentiate the satiety-promoting effect of GLP-1, and a novel dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist was recently shown to trigger greater weight losses compared with a GLP-1 receptor agonist in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study was to delineate the effects of combined GIP and GLP-1 receptor activation on energy intake, appetite and resting energy expenditure in humans. Methods: We examined 17 overweight/obese men in a crossover design with 5 study days. On day 1, a 50 g OGTT was performed; on the following 4 study days, the men received an isoglycaemic i.v. glucose infusion (IIGI) plus saline (154 mmol/l NaCl; placebo), GIP (4 pmol kg−1 min−1), GLP-1 (1 pmol kg−1 min−1) or GIP+GLP-1 (4 and 1 pmol kg−1 min−1, respectively). All IIGIs were performed in a randomised order blinded for the participant and the investigators. The primary endpoint was energy intake as measured by an ad libitum meal after 240 min. Secondary endpoints included appetite ratings and resting energy expenditure, as well as insulin, C-peptide and glucagon responses. Results: Energy intake was significantly reduced during IIGI+GLP-1 compared with IIGI+saline infusion (2715 ± 409 vs 4483 ± 568 kJ [mean ± SEM, n = 17], p = 0.014), whereas there were no significant differences in energy intake during IIGI+GIP (4062 ± 520 kJ) or IIGI+GIP+GLP-1 (3875 ± 451 kJ) infusion compared with IIGI+saline (p = 0.590 and p = 0.364, respectively). Energy intake was higher during IIGI+GIP+GLP-1 compared with IIGI+GLP-1 infusion (p = 0.039). Conclusions/interpretation: While GLP-1 infusion lowered energy intake in overweight/obese men, simultaneous GIP infusion did not potentiate this GLP-1-mediated effect. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02598791 Funding: This study was supported by grants from the Innovation Fund Denmark and the Vissing Foundation.

Introduction: Obesity is a growing threat to public health, increasing risks of numerous diseases and mortality, and impairing quality of life. If current trends continue, more than 1.1 billion individuals will have obesity in 2030, corresponding to almost 2.5 times the number of adults currently living with diabetes. There is a strong interest in developing obesity treatments based on glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonism, which have proved to limit morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetes.Areas covered: This review provides an overview of current compounds containing GLP-1 receptor agonism in clinical development for obesity, with mono-activity at the GLP-1 receptor (PF-0688296, glutazumab, semaglutide) or engaging one or more other endogenous hormonal systems involved in energy balance and metabolism, including glucagon, oxyntomodulin, glucose-dependent inhibitory peptide and amylin (CT-868, CT-388, AMG 133, tirzepatide, NNC9204-1177, JNJ-54,728,518, SAR425899, pegapamodutide, MK8521, cotadutide, efinopegdutide, BI-456,906, cagrilintide + semaglutide 2,4 mg, HM15211, NNC9204-1706).Expert opinion: Many novel compounds employing GLP-1 receptor agonism are in clinical development. Semaglutide is farthest in clinical development and will presumably become a benchmark for this class of novel anti-obesity compounds.

The insulinotropic gut hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) are key factors in the regulation of normal postprandial glucose homeostasis, but in most reports, the glucose-lowering effect of GIP has been shown to be blunted or even absent in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) (1). Despite previous reports that GIP does not potentiate the glucose-lowering effect of GLP-1 in type 2 diabetes (2), a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist (tirzepatide/LY3298176) has recently been reported to reduce HbA1c and body weight in overweight/obese individuals with type 2 diabetes beyond that of GLP-1 receptor monoagonism (dulaglutide) (3).

Randomised controlled trials have shown a neutral or even unfavourable risk–benefit balance of aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events. Using Danish nationwide registries, we investigated aspirin use and associated risks during the past two decades (1998–2018). We linked individual patient data on repeated aspirin redemptions with registered hospital ICD-10 diagnoses of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and bleedings. The prevalence of aspirin use among 1.1 million Danish adults fluctuated over the 20-year study period peaking in 2008 with 8.5% (5.4% primary prevention) and dropping to 5.1% (3.1% primary prevention) in 2018. Aspirin use showed strong age dependency, and 21% of individuals > 80 years were treated with aspirin for primary prevention in 2018. Medication adding to bleeding risk was used concurrently by 21% of all aspirin users in 2018. The incidence of major bleedings were similar with primary and secondary prevention aspirin use and highest in elderly (2 per 100 patient years among individuals > 80 years in 2018). In conclusion, low-dose aspirin use for primary prevention of cardiovascular events remains prevalent. The widespread use of aspirin, especially among older adults, and substantial concomitant use of medications adding to bleeding risk warrant increased focus on discontinuation of inappropriate aspirin use.

Background Intravenous high‐dose glucagon is a recommended antidote against beta‐blocker poisonings, but clinical effects are unclear. We therefore investigated hemodynamic effects and safety of high‐dose glucagon with and without concomitant beta‐blockade. Methods and Results In a randomized crossover study, 10 healthy men received combinations of esmolol (1.25 mg/kg bolus+0.75 mg/kg/min infusion), glucagon (50 µg/kg), and identical volumes of saline placebo on 5 separate days in random order (saline+saline; esmolol+saline; esmolol+glucagon bolus; saline+glucagon infusion; saline+glucagon bolus). On individual days, esmolol/saline was infused from −15 to 30 minutes. Glucagon/saline was administered from 0 minutes as a 2‐minute intravenous bolus or as a 30‐minute infusion (same total glucagon dose). End points were hemodynamic and adverse effects of glucagon compared with saline. Compared with saline, glucagon bolus increased mean heart rate by 13.0 beats per minute (95% CI, 8.0–18.0; P P =0.002), diastolic blood pressure by 9.4 mm Hg (95% CI, 6.3–12.6; P P =0.003) at the 5‐minute time point on days without beta‐blockade. Similar effects of glucagon bolus occurred on days with beta‐blockade and between 15 and 30 minutes during infusion. Hemodynamic effects of glucagon thus reflected pharmacologic glucagon plasma concentrations. Glucagon‐induced nausea occurred in 80% of participants despite ondansetron pretreatment. Conclusions High‐dose glucagon boluses had significant hemodynamic effects regardless of beta‐blockade. A glucagon infusion had comparable and apparently longer‐lasting effects compared with bolus, indicating that infusion may be preferable to bolus injections. Registration Information URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03533179.

The number of people suffering from type 2 diabetes (T2D) and its complications is on the rise; and, thus continues to expand the market for pharmacologic agents targeting the disease. At present, only the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) have demonstrated macrovascular benefits and reduction in mortality in T2D.This review provides an overview of the more than 20 drug classes in clinical development for T2D, with an outline of their mode of action, efficacy, safety, and current status.New GLP-1 RA and SGLT-2i are dominating the clinical pipeline. A range of glucoregulatory hormone-based drugs are also under development (e.g. GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon receptor co-agonists) for the treatment of T2D and associated conditions such as obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Glucokinase activators and imeglimin are in phase III of development. Other drugs in phase I-II (e.g. fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase inhibitors, activators of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase and Lyn kinase; and agonists of the receptor for growth differentiation factor 15, fibroblast growth factor-21, and G protein-coupled receptor-119) show promising diverse mechanisms of action, but have yet to show net clinical benefits.

Gluco-regulatory effects of the insulinotropic and glucagonotropic gut hormone glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) in type 1 diabetes (T1D) are unclear. We evaluated the effects of exogenous and endogenous GIP on plasma glucose excursions in a setting of prandial insulin over-dose and physical activity after meal ingestion. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, crossover study, 12 men with T1D (age [mean±SD]: 26±6.6 years; BMI: 23±2.3 kg/m2; HbA1c: 6.5±2.7% (48.4±6.3 mmol/mol); diabetes duration: 11.3±5.5 years; plasma C-peptide The GIP infusion attenuated postprandial plasma glucose excursions (Cmax-Cmin) by [mean±SEM] 1.5±0.5 mmol/L and 0.92±0.56 mmol/L compared to GIP(3-30)NH2 and placebo, respectively (P=0.03). Infused glucose needed to avoid plasma glucose In conclusion, GIP infusion seems to attenuate postprandial plasma glucose excursions without significantly increasing the need of glucose to avoid hypoglycemia in patients with T1D. Disclosure B. Hoe: None. S.M. Nguyen Heimbürger: None. L.S. Gasbjerg: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Antag Therapeutics. M.B. Lynggaard: None. B. Hartmann: None. J.J. Holst: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Zealand Pharma A/S. Other Relationship; Spouse/Partner; Antag Therapeutics. T. Vilsbøll: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Mundipharma International, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Consultant; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly Diabetes, Medscape, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Sanofi. A. Lund: Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. S. Engberg: None. T.F. Dejgaard: Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Consultant; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk A/S. M.B. Christensen: None. F.K. Knop: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mundipharma International, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Consultant; Self; Carmot Therapeutics, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk A/S. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Gubra, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Zealand Pharma A/S. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Norgine B.V., Novo Nordisk A/S. Funding The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (2018PG-T1D037)

The incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) are secreted postprandially and contribute importantly to postprandial glucose tolerance. In this study, we assessed the individual and combined contributions of endogenous GIP and GLP-1 to the postprandial changes in glucose and glucoregulatory hormones using the novel GIP receptor antagonist GIP(3-30)NH2 and the well-established GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin(9-39)NH2. During 4-h oral glucose tolerance tests (75 g) combined with an ad libitum meal test, 18 healthy men received on four separate days in randomized, double-blinded order intravenous infusions of A) GIP(3-30)NH2 (800 pmol/kg/min) plus exendin(9-39)NH2 (0–20 min: 1,000 pmol/kg/min; 20–240 min: 450 pmol/kg/min), B) GIP(3-30)NH2, C) exendin(9-39)NH2, and D) saline, respectively. Glucose excursions were significantly higher during A than during B, C, and D, while glucose excursions during B were higher than during C and D. Insulin secretion (assessed by C-peptide/glucose ratio) was reduced by 37 ± 16% (A), 30 ± 17% (B), and 8.6 ± 16% (C) compared with D (mean ± SD). A and C resulted in higher glucagon levels and faster gastric emptying. In conclusion, endogenous GIP affects postprandial plasma glucose excursions and insulin secretion more than endogenous GLP-1, but the hormones contribute additively to postprandial glucose regulation in healthy individuals.

Bisacodyl and sodium picosulfate are classified both as stimulant laxatives, approved for short-term treatment of constipation and sold without prescription (OTC). Stimulant laxatives are associated with harmful long-term colonic effects and possible carcinogenic risk - and evidence support that these agents are used for longer periods. We aimed to compile and review the clinical trial evidence describing the effectiveness and safety of long-term treatment (14 continuous days) with stimulant laxatives.The PubMed database was searched for all randomised clinical trials (RCTs) examining the effect of bisacodyl or sodium picosulfate in adult patients diagnosed with constipation.Five RCTs (one open-label and four double-blinded) with intervention periods of four weeks duration were eligible. These included 1008 patients, whereof 26% dropped out. A positive global assessment of efficacy was obtained in 78-99% of the patients treated with bisacodyl or sodium picosulfate. Notably, the same global assessment was obtained in 46-54% of the placebo-treated patients. Compared to placebo, an improvement in stool consistency and a significant increase in number of bowel movements peer week were seen in favor of bisacodyl and sodium picosulfate. However, for pyridostigmine, a significant difference was seen compared to bisacodyl. AEs were generally mild, but frequent (up to 72%) mostly diarrhea and abdominal pain.The evidence base does not support use of stimulant laxatives for more than four weeks. Due to the substantial use of stimulant laxatives including sold OTC, longer term RCTs and epidemiological studies investigating effects and safety on the longer term are warranted.

The incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) are well known for their insulinotropic effects and they are thought to affect bone homeostasis as mediators in the so-called entero-osseous axis. We examined the contributions of endogenous GIP and GLP-1, respectively, to postprandial bone homeostasis, in healthy subjects in two randomized and double-blind crossover studies. We included healthy men who received either four oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) (n = 18, median age 27 (range 20–70), BMI 27.2 (22.4–37.0) kg/m2) or liquid mixed meal tests (MMTs) (n = 12, age 23 (19–65), BMI 23.7 (20.3–25.5) kg/m2) with infusions of 1) the GIP receptor antagonist GIP(3-30)NH2, 2) the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin(9–39)NH2, 3) both GIP(3–30)NH2 and exendin(9–39)NH2, or 4) placebo infusions (saline) on four separate visits. Bone resorption was evaluated from levels of circulating carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks (CTX) and bone formation from levels of procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP). During placebo infusions, baseline-subtracted area under the curve values for CTX were −39 ± 5.0 (OGTT) and −57 ± 4.3 ng/ml × min (MMT). When GIP(3–30)NH2 was administered, CTX suppression was significantly diminished compared to placebo (−30 ± 4.8 (OGTT) and −45 ± 4.6 ng/ml × min (MMT), P = 0.0104 and P = 0.0288, respectively, compared to placebo. During exendin(9–39)NH2 infusion, CTX suppression after OGTT/MMT was similar to placebo (P = 0.28 (OGTT) and P = 0.93 (MMT)). The relative contribution of endogenous GIP to postprandial suppression of bone resorption during both OGTT and MMT was similar and reached 22–25%. There were no differences in P1NP concentrations between interventions. In conclusion, endogenous GIP contributes by up to 25% to postprandial suppression of bone resorption in humans whereas an effect of endogenous GLP-1 could not be demonstrated.

In a double-blinded, randomized, crossover trial, we investigated the hemodynamic effects of high-dose intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) with/without metoprolol. Ten healthy volunteers each completed 4 trial days (placebo + ILE; metoprolol + placebo; metoprolol + ILE; placebo + placebo) in random order. Metoprolol was administered as an initial bolus (10 mg), followed by an infusion (50 mg) from 5 to 30 minutes. ILE was administered as a bolus at 12.5 minutes (2.5 mL/kg), followed by a 15-minute infusion (0.25 mL/kg per minute). On metoprolol + ILE days (compared with metoprolol + placebo) after 120 minutes, mean heart rates were significantly higher (difference, 5.5 beats per minute (bpm); 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.0-8.1 bpm; P < 0.001), and average relative cardiac output was higher (difference, 10 percentage points; 95% CI, 5-15 percentage points; P < 0.001). The hemodynamic effect of ILE developed gradually. ILE had no effect on plasma metoprolol or major adverse events. In conclusion, high-dose ILE has relatively marginal and delayed hemodynamic effects that may have limited clinical relevance in the short-term clinical toxicological setting.

Fasting hyperglucagonemia can be detrimental to glucose metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and may contribute to metabolic disturbances in obese and/or prediabetic subjects. However, the mechanisms underlying fasting hyperglucagonemia remain elusive.We evaluated the interrelationship between fasting hyperglucagonemia and demographic and biochemical parameters in 106 patients with T2D (31% female, age: 57 ± 9 years [mean ± standard deviation; body mass index (BMI): 30.1 ± 4.4 kg/mFasting plasma glucagon concentrations were significantly higher among patients with T2D (13.5 ± 6.3 vs. 8.5 ± 3.8 mM, P 0.001) together with HbA1c (P 0.001), FPG (P 0.001), and insulin (84.9 ± 56.4 vs. 57.7 ± 35.3 mM, P 0.001). When adjusted for T2D, HbA1c and insulin were significantly positive determinants for fasting plasma glucagon concentrations. Furthermore, WHR comprised a significant positive determinant.We confirm that fasting plasma glucagon concentrations are abnormally high in patients with T2D, and show that fasting plasma glucagon concentrations are influenced by WHR (in addition to glycemic control and fasting plasma insulin concentrations), which may point to visceral fat deposition as an important determinant of increased fasting plasma glucagon concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are widely used drugs that have a narrow therapeutic index. Even minor overdoses must be treated in-hospital due to the risk of severe hypotension and bradycardia. We aimed to describe trends in CCB use and overdoses in Denmark.METHODS: Data on enquiries concerning CCBs reported to the Danish Poisons Information Center (DPIC) from January 2009 to January 2015 was coupled with data on hospitalization and mortality obtained from Danish National Registers. We obtained data on the general use of CCBs in Denmark and retrieved medical charts on fatal cases.RESULTS: From a total of 126,987 enquiries to the DPIC in 2009-2014 we identified 339 CCB unique exposures (3‰ of all). Children CONCLUSION: Four fifths of enquiries to the DPIC result in hospitalization and one fifth concern small children. Mortality were infrequent and occurred only in adults with suicidal exposures and with and an overrepresentation of verapamil exposures.

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a major global health challenge associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Intervention strategies managing multiple risk facto...

A large overdose of insulin is a serious health matter. Information concerning administration and duration of intravenous (IV) glucose, other treatment options or complications besides hypoglycaemia following large insulin overdoses is not readily apparent from the literature. A systematic search, compilation and review of case reports on insulin overdoses, published 1986-2017, was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and PROSPERO databases. Of 1523 published articles, 45 cases of insulin overdoses were included with a total median insulin dose of 900 international units (IU) (range 26-4800 IU). Hospitalization occurred in 44 cases with a median hospitalization duration of 94 hr (range 12-721 hr), and one-third (n = 15) admitted to the intensive care unit. First-line treatment was IV glucose treatment in 95% of cases. Treatment options besides IV glucose that were reported beneficial included glucagon IV or intramuscular (IM), octreotide IV or IM, surgical excision, hydrocortisone IV and oral intake of complex carbohydrates. Prevalent complications were intermittent cerebral impairment (73%), hypokalaemia (49%), other electrolyte disturbances (42%), and hepatic disturbances (7%) and cardiac toxicity (e.g. cardiac arrhythmia) (9%). Long-term consequences were one case of lasting hypoglycaemic encephalopathy and one death. In conclusion, following large insulin overdoses, in-hospital admission and treatment with IV glucose may be needed for up to a week. Monitoring of electrolytes and hepatic and cardiac functions seems important. Several experimental treatment options may be considered in addition to glucose administration. With appropriate pre- and in-hospital treatment, cases with severe hypoglycaemia and neurologic complications may have a favourable outcome.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an incretin hormone secreted postprandially from enteroendocrine K cells, but despite therapeutically interesting effects, GIP physiology in humans remains incompletely understood. Progress in this field could be facilitated by a suitable GIP receptor antagonist. For the first time in humans, we investigated the antagonistic properties of the naturally occurring GIP(3-30)NH2 in in vivo and in in vitro receptor studies. In transiently transfected COS-7 cells, GIP(3-30)NH2 was evaluated with homologous receptor binding and receptor activation (cAMP accumulation) studies at the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2), glucagon, secretin and growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) receptors. Ten healthy men (eligibility criteria: age 20–30 years, HbA1c less than 6.5% [48 mmol/mol] and fasting plasma glucose [FPG] less than 7 mmol/l) were included in the clinical study. Data were collected as plasma and serum samples from a cubital vein cannula. As primary outcome, insulin secretion and glucose requirements were evaluated together with in a randomised, four-period, crossover design by infusing GIP(3-30)NH2 (800 pmol kg−1 min−1), GIP (1.5 pmol kg−1 min−1), a combination of these or placebo during hyperglycaemic clamp experiments. The content of the infusions were blinded to the study participants and experimental personnel. No study participants dropped out. GIP(3-30)NH2 neither bound, stimulated nor antagonised a series of related receptors in vitro. The elimination plasma half-life of GIP(3-30)NH2 in humans was 7.6 ± 1.4 min. Markedly larger amounts of glucose were required to maintain the clamp during GIP infusion compared with the other days. GIP-induced insulin secretion was reduced by 82% (p

Infusion of the incretin hormone glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) suppresses the bone resorption marker carboxy-terminal type 1 collagen crosslinks (CTX). Using separate and combined infusions of the selective GIP receptor (GIPR) antagonist, GIP(3-30)NH2, and GIP, we investigated how GIPR inhibition affects bone turnover markers. Ten healthy men (median age 22.5 years (range 21-25), BMI 21.3kg/m2 (19.9-24.7)) participated in a randomized, doubled blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study with four 1h 12mmol/l-hyperglycemic clamps on four separate study days with concomitant infusions of GIP, GIP+GIP(3-30)NH2, GIP(3-30)NH2, and placebo, respectively, separated by a period of at least one week. GIP was infused at 1.5pmol/kg/min and GIP(3-30)NH2 at 800pmol/kg/min. Plasma glucose was clamped at 12.0±1.2mmol/l and plasma levels of GIP and GIP(3-30)NH2 amounted to ∼80pmol/l and ∼50nmol/l, respectively. GIP suppressed CTX more than placebo (baseline-subtracted AUC -6,811±1,260 vs. -3,012±3,018ng/l×min, P= 0.002) and resulted in CTX values of 53 ± 6.9% (GIP) versus 81 ± 10% of baseline (placebo), respectively (P = 0.0006), at the end of the hyperglycemic clamp. Co-infusion of GIP and GIP(3-30)NH2 attenuated the GIP-induced CTX suppression by 51±33% (P = 0.01). The peak value of the bone formation marker N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen (P1NP) peaked at higher levels during GIP (109±6.7% of baseline) than during GIP(3-30)NH2 infusion (101±8.9%) (P = 0.049) and GIP suppressed PTH levels compared to GIP(3-30)NH2 alone (P = 0.0158). In conclusion, blockade of the GIPR with GIP(3-30)NH2 diminished GIP-induced CTX and P1NP responses, showing that these effects are GIPR-mediated and that GIPR antagonism might interfere with bone resorption.

Context In healthy individuals, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) enhances insulin secretion and reduces bone resorption by up to 25% estimated by absolute placebo-corrected changes in carboxy-terminal type 1 collagen crosslinks (CTX) during GIP and glucose administration. In patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), GIP’s insulinotropic effect is impaired and effects on bone may be reduced. Objective To investigate GIP’s effect on bone biomarkers in patients with T2D. Design Randomized, double-blinded, crossover study investigating 6 interventions. Patients Twelve male patients with T2D. Interventions A primed continuous 90-minute GIP infusion (2 pmol/kg/min) or matching placebo (saline) administered at 3 plasma glucose (PG) levels (i.e., paired days with “insulin-induced hypoglycemia” (PG lowered to 3 mmol/L), “fasting hyperglycemia” (mean PG ~8 mmol/L), or “aggravated hyperglycemia” (mean PG ~12 mmol/L). Main Outcome Measures Bone biomarkers: CTX, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and PTH. Results On days with insulin-induced hypoglycemia, CTX was suppressed by up to 40 ± 15% during GIP administration compared with 12 ± 11% during placebo infusion (P Conclusions Short-term GIP infusions reduce bone resorption by more than one-third (estimated by absolute placebo-corrected CTX reductions) in patients with T2DM, suggesting preserved bone effects of GIP in these patients. Précis Short-term GIP infusions reduce the bone resorption marker CTX by one-third in patients with type 2 diabetes independent of glycemic levels.

Context: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is used worldwide to prevent liver injury after paracetamol overdoses. Anaphylactoid reactions to NAC occur frequently and often lead to treatment interruptions or d...

During the past four decades derangements in glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) biology has been viewed upon as contributing factors to various parts of the pathophysiology type 2 diabetes. This overview outlines and discusses the impaired insulin responses to GIP as well as the effect of GIP on glucagon secretion and the potential involvement of GIP in the obesity and bone disease associated with type 2 diabetes. As outlined in this review, it is unlikely that the impaired insulinotropic effect of GIP occurs as a primary event in the development of type 2 diabetes, but rather develops once the diabetic state is present and beta cells are unable to maintain normoglycemia. In various models, GIP has effects on glucagon secretion, bone and lipid homeostasis, but whether these effects contribute substantially to the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes is at present controversial. The review also discusses the substantial uncertainty surrounding the translation of preclinical data relating to the GIP system and outline future research directions.

Background Tsetse flies (Glossina sp.) are the vectors of human and animal trypanosomiasis throughout sub-Saharan Africa. Tsetse flies are distinguished from other Diptera by unique adaptations, including lactation and the birthing of live young (obligate viviparity), a vertebrate blood-specific diet by both sexes, and obligate bacterial symbiosis. This work describes the comparative analysis of six Glossina genomes representing three sub-genera: Morsitans (G. morsitans morsitans, G. pallidipes, G. austeni), Palpalis (G. palpalis, G. fuscipes), and Fusca (G. brevipalpis) which represent different habitats, host preferences, and vectorial capacity. Results Genomic analyses validate established evolutionary relationships and sub-genera. Syntenic analysis of Glossina relative to Drosophila melanogaster shows reduced structural conservation across the sex-linked X chromosome. Sex-linked scaffolds show increased rates of female-specific gene expression and lower evolutionary rates relative to autosome associated genes. Tsetse-specific genes are enriched in protease, odorant-binding, and helicase activities. Lactation-associated genes are conserved across all Glossina species while male seminal proteins are rapidly evolving. Olfactory and gustatory genes are reduced across the genus relative to other insects. Vision-associated Rhodopsin genes show conservation of motion detection/tracking functions and variance in the Rhodopsin detecting colors in the blue wavelength ranges. Conclusions Expanded genomic discoveries reveal the genetics underlying Glossina biology and provide a rich body of knowledge for basic science and disease control. They also provide insight into the evolutionary biology underlying novel adaptations and are relevant to applied aspects of vector control such as trap design and discovery of novel pest and disease control strategies.

Accumulating evidence suggests that glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) in addition to its involvement in type 2 diabetic pathophysiology may be involved in the development of obesity and the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. In this review, we outline recent preclinical and clinical cardiovascular-related discoveries about GIP. These include chronotropic and blood pressure-lowering effects of GIP. Furthermore, GIP has been suggested to control vasodilation via secretion of nitric oxide, and vascular leukocyte adhesion and inflammation via expression and secretion of endothelin 1. Also, GIP seems to regulate circulating lipids via effects on adipose tissue uptake and metabolism of lipids. Lastly, we discuss how dysmetabolic conditions such as obesity and type 2 diabetes may shift the actions of GIP in an atherogenic direction, and we provide a perspective on the therapeutic potential of GIP receptor agonism and antagonism in cardiovascular diseases. We conclude that GIP actions may have implications for the development of cardiovascular disease, but also that the potential of GIP-based drugs for the treatment of cardiovascular disease currently is uncertain.

The incretin hormone glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is released from the small intestine following meal ingestion and potentiates glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Exogenous GIP has a poor insulinotropic effect in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We investigated postprandial effects of endogenous GIP in patients with T2D using the GIP receptor antagonist, GIP(3-30)NH2. In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, 10 patients with T2D (mean±SD; HbA1c 6.9±3.2%; BMI 32.5±4.8 kg/m2) received 250-minute infusions of GIP(3-30)NH2 (1,200 pmol/kg/min) or placebo (saline) during two separate standardized liquid meal tests. Compared with placebo, GIP(3-30)NH2 infusion caused lower postprandial insulin (Δ%±SD; -19±15%, P=0.010) and C-peptide (-14±21%, P=0.021) responses (area under the curve) but had no effect on plasma glucagon (P=0.580) or glucose excursions (P=0.692). Postprandial inhibition of bone resorption (assessed by carboxy-terminal collagen crosslinks) was ∼50% lower during GIP(3-30)NH2 infusion compared with placebo (P=0.005; Figure 1). In conclusion, endogenous GIP slightly reduced postprandial insulin secretion with no effect on postprandial glucagon or glucose concentrations in patients with T2D. In contrast, endogenous GIP was a major determinant of postprandial suppression of bone resorption in these patients. Disclosure S. Stensen: None. L.S. Gasbjerg: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Antag Therapeutics. L.S. Krogh: None. A.H. Sparre-Ulrich: Other Relationship; Self; Antag Therapeutics. K. Skov-Jeppesen: None. M. Jensen: Employee; Self; Antag Therapeutics. B. Hartmann: None. T. Vilsbøll: None. J.J. Holst: Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. M.M. Rosenkilde: Consultant; Self; Antag Therapeutics. M.B. Christensen: None. F.K. Knop: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mundipharma, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Consultant; Self; Amgen Inc., Carmot Therapeutics, Novo Nordisk A/S. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker's Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, MedImmune, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Mundipharma, Norgine, Novo Nordisk A/S. Funding Novo Nordisk Foundation; European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes

Albiglutide is a long-acting, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist for subcutaneous administration with a recommended dose of 30-50 mg once weekly. The aim of this article is to outline the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of albiglutide including the clinical efficacy and safety data underlying the approval of albiglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in both Europe and USA. Albiglutide is cleared from the circulation (by a mechanism partially dependent on renal function) with an elimination half-life of 5 days, allowing once-weekly administration. In the clinical trial program called HARMONY, albiglutide demonstrated placebo-corrected reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin of 0.8-1.0%. In addition, reductions in fasting plasma glucose in the range of 1.3-2.4 mmol/L compared with placebo were reported. Albiglutide caused weight reductions at a level comparable to placebo in the HARMONY trials, possibly related to limited central nervous system penetration of the large albiglutide molecule. Albiglutide demonstrated a generally favorable safety profile, although with a signal of an increased risk of pancreatitis. The well-known adverse events related to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor activation such as nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting were less frequent with albiglutide compared with another glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, liraglutide, but slightly more frequent following treatment with albiglutide than with placebo or active comparators from other classes of anti-hyperglycemic drugs. The full risk-benefit profile for albiglutide used in treating type 2 diabetes will not be clear until reporting of the long-term cardiovascular outcome trial (HARMONY Outcome) with planned completion in 2019.

Introduction A solid body of preclinical evidence shows that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists attenuate the effects of substance use disorder related behaviors. The mechanisms underlying these effects remain elusive. In the present study, we hypothesized that GLP-1R activation modulates dopaminetransporter (DAT) and thus dopamine (DA) homeostasis in striatum. This was evaluated in three different experiments: two preclinical and one clinical. Methods Rat striatal DA uptake, DA clearance and DAT cell surface expression was assessed following GLP-1 (7-36)-amide exposure in vitro. DA uptake in mice was assesed ex vivo following systemic treatment with the GLP-1R agonist exenatide. In addition, DA uptake was measured in GLP-1R knockout mice and compared with DA-uptake in wild type mice. In healthy humans, changes in DAT availability was assessed during infusion of exenatide measured by single-photon emission computed tomography imaging. Results In rats, GLP-1 (7-36)-amide increased DA uptake, DA clearance and DAT cell surface expression in striatum. In mice, exenatide did not change striatal DA uptake. In GLP-1R knockout mice, DA uptake was similar to what was measured in wildtype mice. In humans, systemic infusion of exenatide did not result in acute changes in striatal DAT availability. Conclusions The GLP-1R agonist-induced modulation of striatal DAT activity in vitro in rats could not be replicated ex vivo in mice and in vivo in humans. Therefore, the underlying mechanisms of action for the GLP-1R agonists-induced efficacy in varios addiction-like behavioural models still remain.

CONTEXT: The gut-derived incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) have been suggested to play a role in bone metabolism. Exogenous administration of GIP inhibits bone resorption, but the effect of GLP-1 is less clear. Furthermore, the combined effect of exogenous GIP and GLP-1 on bone metabolism is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of separate and combined infusions of the incretin hormones GIP and GLP-1 on bone resorption and formation. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study including five study days. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen overweight/obese men. INTERVENTIONS: On the first study day, a 50-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed. On the next four study days, isoglycemic IV glucose infusions (IIGI), mimicking the glucose excursions from the OGTT, were performed with concomitant infusions of GIP (4 pmol/kg/min), GLP-1 (1 pmol/kg/min), GIP+GLP-1 (4 and 1 pmol/kg/min, respectively), or placebo, respectively. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Changes in bone resorption assessed by measurements of carboxy-terminal type I collagen crosslinks (CTX) and in bone formation as assessed by procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) concentrations. RESULTS: During the OGTT, CTX was significantly lowered by 54 ± 13% from baseline (mean ± SD) compared with 28 ± 12% during IIGI + saline (P < 0.0001). During IIGI+GLP-1 and IIGI+GIP, CTX was lowered by 65 ± 16% and 74 ± 9%, respectively, from baseline, whereas IGII+GIP+GLP-1 lowered CTX by 84 ± 4% from baseline. P1NP levels were unaffected by the interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that GLP-1, like GIP, may be involved in regulation of bone resorption and that GIP and GLP-1 together have partially additive inhibitory effects.

The influence by gut-derived hormones on bone remodelling appears increasingly important as research on the enteroendocrine-osseous axis accelerates. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is secreted from the gut and potentiates insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner. GIP has, like the two other gut-derived hormones, glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucagon-like peptide 2, been shown to affect bone remodelling as part of the enteroendocrine-osseous axis. Observational studies have shown that a mutation in the GIP receptor causing reduced receptor signalling leads to lower bone mineral density and increased fracture risk. Rodent as well as human studies have shown that GIP causes serum levels of the bone resorption marker carboxy-terminal type 1 collagen crosslinks to decline. GIP may also increase bone formation indicating a potential uncoupling of bone resorption and formation. Here, we review past and recent discoveries elucidating the enteroendocrine-osseous axis with a special focus on GIP.

The gut-derived incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) are known for insulinotropic and glucose-lowering effects. However, their individual roles in postprandial glucose homeostasis are unknown. We infused the GIP receptor antagonist GIP(3-30)NH2 and the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin(9-39) during a meal to determine the roles of endogenous GIP and GLP-1 on postprandial glucose metabolism. On four separate days, 12 healthy men (age 19-65 years, BMI 20-25 kg/m2) received a liquid mixed meal test with randomized and double-blinded infusions of GIP(3-30)NH2 (800 pmol/kg/min) + Ex(9-39) (450 pmol/kg/min) (A), GIP(3-30)NH2 (B), Ex(9-39) (C), and saline (D). On Day A, B and C, glucose excursions were significantly increased by 85%, 55% and 15%, respectively, compared to D. Day A and B excursions were significantly higher than C (Figure). Glucagon levels at 60 min differed between Day A and B (11.5±1.2 vs. 7.5±0.6 pmol/l, P=0.01), and Day B and C (11.5±1.2 vs. 12.9±1.5 pmol/l, P=0.008). GLP-1 was higher on Day A (P=0.01) and C (P=0.02) than D. No significant effects on insulin, C-peptide, gastric emptying, or GIP were observed. We conclude that endogenous GIP affects postprandial plasma glucose excursions more pronouncedly than GLP-1, and that both hormones additively contribute to control postprandial glycemia in healthy subjects. Disclosure L.S. Gasbjerg: Stock/Shareholder; Self; Antag Therapeutics. M.M. Helsted: None. A.H. Sparre-Ulrich: Employee; Self; Antag Therapeutics ApS. A.R. Lanng: None. S. Stensen: None. M. Jakobsen: None. B. Hartmann: None. M.B. Christensen: None. J.J. Holst: Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Board Member; Self; Zealand Pharma A/S. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., AstraZeneca. Research Support; Self; Danish Diabetes Academy, Novo Nordisk Foundation. Other Relationship; Self; Antag Therapeutics. Other Relationship; Spouse/Partner; Antag Therapeutics. T. Vilsbøll: Advisory Panel; Self; Amgen Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, AstraZeneca, MSD K.K., Sanofi, Novo Nordisk A/S. Consultant; Self; Amgen Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, AstraZeneca, MSD K.K., Sanofi, Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Amgen Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, AstraZeneca, MSD K.K., Sanofi, Novo Nordisk A/S. Research Support; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk A/S. M.M. Rosenkilde: Other Relationship; Self; Antag Therapeutics. Advisory Panel; Spouse/Partner; Novo Nordisk A/S. Board Member; Spouse/Partner; Zealand Pharma A/S. Speaker's Bureau; Spouse/Partner; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., AstraZeneca. Research Support; Spouse/Partner; Danish Diabetes Academy, Novo Nordisk Foundation. Other Relationship; Spouse/Partner; Antag Therapeutics. F.K. Knop: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca. Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca. Speaker's Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca. Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Advisory Panel; Self; Amgen Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.. Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Consultant; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Consultant; Self; Amgen Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; MedImmune, Sanofi. Consultant; Self; Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Sanofi. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Sanofi.

We investigated the effect of mono- and co-administration of the incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) on bone resorption and formation. Seventeen overweight/obese men without diabetes were included in a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over study and subjected to a 50g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and four isoglycemic intravenous glucose infusions (IIGI), mimicking the glucose excursions from the OGTT, with concomitant infusions of GIP (4 pmol/kg/min), GLP-1 (1 pmol/kg/min), GIP+GLP-1 (4 and 1 pmol/kg/min, respectively) or placebo. Bone resorption and formation were assessed by measurements of carboxy-terminal type 1 collagen crosslinks (CTX), and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), respectively. Suppression of CTX is shown in Fig. 1. During OGTT the baseline subtracted area under the curve (bsAUC) was significantly lower than during IIGI+saline infusion (-9,117±566 (mean±SEM) vs. -4,333±583 %×min, P Disclosure N.C. Bergmann: Employee; Self; Zealand Pharma A/S. A.B. Lund: Other Relationship; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. S.M. Heimbürger: Research Support; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. L. Jessen: Employee; Self; Zealand Pharma A/S. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Zealand Pharma A/S, Novo Nordisk A/S. M.B. Christensen: None. T. Vilsbøll: Advisory Panel; Self; Amgen Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, AstraZeneca, MSD K.K., Sanofi, Novo Nordisk A/S. Consultant; Self; Amgen Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, AstraZeneca, MSD K.K., Sanofi, Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Amgen Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, AstraZeneca, MSD K.K., Sanofi, Novo Nordisk A/S. Research Support; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk A/S. F.K. Knop: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca. Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca. Speaker's Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca. Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Advisory Panel; Self; Amgen Inc.. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.. Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Consultant; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Consultant; Self; Amgen Inc.. Advisory Panel; Self; MedImmune, Sanofi. Consultant; Self; Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Sanofi. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Sanofi.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore whether general practitioners (GPs) experienced barriers toward medication reviews in polymedicated, multimorbid patients, and how a clinical pharmacologist with a focus on pharmacotherapy can support the GPs in an outpatient clinic. Design: The study was descriptive and exploratory and had a qualitative design with a phenomenological/hermeneutic orientation for the interviews. Participants: The study comprised 14 interviews with 14 different GPs from the Capital Region of Denmark. Results: Three themes emerged from the interviews: (1) The care of patients With polypharmacy is challenged by the lack of professional dialogue and collaboration between GPs and hospital-based clinical pharmacologists, (2) the relationship between the patients with polypharmacy and the GP is characterized by care and individual considerations, and (3) the culture encourages adding medication and inhibits dialogue about medication withdrawal even for patients with polypharmacy. Conclusion and implications for practice: This study found that the primary barriers toward multimorbid patients with polypharmacy were the need for communication and teamwork with specialists (cardiologists, neurologists, endocrinologists, etc). Often, GPs felt that the specialists at the hospitals were more concerned about following standards and guidelines regarding specific diseases instead of a more holistic patient approach. To improve management of polypharmacy patients, the GPs suggest that a joint force is necessary, a partner-like relationship with greater transparency regarding information transfer, feedback, and shared decision-making, but also more education in the pharmacological field is essential.

BackgroundIntravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) is used to treat drug poisonings. The resultant hyperlipemia may affect laboratory tests but the consequences are poorly characterized. In a clinical trial we therefore investigated the effects of ILE on laboratory tests analyzed on common analytical platforms (Roche®cobas 8000 and SYSMEX®flow-cytometry).MethodsTen healthy participants each completed 4 trial days (two with ILE and two with placebo). ILE (5.25 mL/kg) was administered from 12.5 to 30 min from baseline. At 0, 30 and 60 min, blood samples were drawn for measurement of 20 analytes. We investigated the effects of ILE on analyte levels and frequencies of exceedance of predefined analyzer hemolysis (H) or lipemia (L)-index cut-offs and test-specific reference change values (RCVs) on ILE-days. If the results were blocked due to exceedance of index values, we manually extracted the results.ResultsSixteen out of 20 tests were blocked because H- or L-index cut-offs were exceeded on ILE-days. Differences in analyte levels between ILE- and placebo-days above the RCV were observed for aspartate aminotransferase, total calcium, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), sodium and neutrophils. Mean values outside the normal range after ILE were observed for LDH (219 U/L), sodium (135.3 mmol/L) and total calcium (2.1 mmol/L).ConclusionsILE-infusion caused report failure of nearly all laboratory tests performed on a cobas 8000-platform, but it was possible to manually retrieve the results. For most test results – particularly alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, phosphate and carbamide – the consequences of ILE were marginal, and the effects of ILE were reduced at the 60-min timepoint.

Glucagon is believed to be a pancreas-specific hormone, and hyperglucagonemia has been shown to contribute significantly to the hyperglycemic state of patients with diabetes. This hyperglucagonemia has been thought to arise from α-cell insensitivity to suppressive effects of glucose and insulin combined with reduced insulin secretion. We hypothesized that postabsorptive hyperglucagonemia represents a gut-dependent phenomenon and subjected 10 totally pancreatectomized patients and 10 healthy control subjects to a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test and a corresponding isoglycemic intravenous glucose infusion. We applied novel analytical methods of plasma glucagon (sandwich ELISA and mass spectrometry–based proteomics) and show that 29–amino acid glucagon circulates in patients without a pancreas and that glucose stimulation of the gastrointestinal tract elicits significant hyperglucagonemia in these patients. These findings emphasize the existence of extrapancreatic glucagon (perhaps originating from the gut) in man and suggest that it may play a role in diabetes secondary to total pancreatectomy.

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: Medication-related problems are frequent and can lead to serious adverse events resulting in increased morbidity, mortality, and costs. Medication use in frail older patients is even more complex. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a pharmacist-led medicines management model among older patients at admission, during inpatient stay and at discharge on medication-related readmissions.METHOD: A randomized controlled trial conducted at the acute admission unit in a Danish hospital with acutely admitted medical patients, randomized to either a control group or one of two intervention groups. The intervention consisted of pharmacist-led medication review and patient interview upon admission (intervention ED) or pharmacist-led medication review and patient interview upon admission, medication review during inpatient stay, and medication report and patient counselling at discharge (intervention STAY).RESULTS: In total, 600 patients were included. The pharmacist identified 920 medication-related problems with 57% of the recommendations accepted by the physician. After 30 days, 25 patients had a medication-related readmission, with no statistical significant difference between the groups on either primary or secondary outcomes.CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that a clinical pharmacist can be used to identify and solve medication-related problems, but this study did not find any effect on the selected outcomes. The frequency of medication-related readmissions was low, leaving little room for improvement. Future research should consider other study designs or outcome measures.

Context Glucagon's effects on hemodynamic parameters, most notably heart rate and cardiac contractility, are often overlooked. The glucagon receptor is a central target in novel and anticipated type 2 diabetes therapies, and hemodynamic consequences of glucagon signaling have therefore become increasingly important. In this review, we summarize and evaluate published studies on glucagon pharmacology with a focus on clinical hemodynamic effects in humans. Evidence Acquisition PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for clinical studies concerning hemodynamic effects of glucagon (no year restriction). Papers reporting effects of a defined glucagon dose on any hemodynamic parameter were included. Reference searches were conducted in retrieved articles. Evidence Synthesis Hemodynamic effects of glucagon have been investigated mainly in cohort studies of patients suffering from heart failure receiving large glucagon bolus injections. The identified studies had shortcomings related to restricted patient groups, lack of a control group, randomization, or blinding. We identified no properly conducted randomized clinical trials. The majority of human studies report stimulating effects of pharmacological glucagon doses on heart rate, cardiac contractility, and blood pressure. The effects were characterized by short duration, interindividual variation, and rapid desensitization. Some studies reported no measurable effects of glucagon. Conclusions The level of evidence regarding hemodynamic effects of glucagon is low, and observations in published studies are inconsistent. Actual effects, interindividual variation, dose-response relationships, and possible long-term effects of supraphysiological glucagon levels warrant further investigation.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an intestinal hormone with a broad range of physiological actions. In the postprandial state, the hormone stimulates insulin secretion and during eu- and hypoglycemia, it stimulates glucagon secretion. In addition, GIP increases triacylglycerol (TAG) uptake in adipose tissue and decreases bone resorption. However, the importance of these actions in humans are not clearly understood as a specific GIP receptor (GIPR) antagonist - an essential tool to study GIP physiology - has been missing. Several different GIPR antagonists have been identified comprising both peptides, vaccines against GIP, GIP antibodies or antibodies against the GIPR. However, most of these have only been tested in rodents. In vitro, N- and C-terminally truncated GIP variants are potent and efficacious GIPR antagonists. Recently, GIP(3-30)NH2, a naturally occurring peptide, was shown to block the GIPR in humans and decrease GIP-induced insulin secretion as well as adipose tissue blood flow and TAG uptake. So far, there are no studies with a GIPR antagonist in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but because the elevations in fasting plasma glucagon and paradoxical postprandial glucagon excursions, seen in patients with T2D, are aggravated by GIP, a GIPR antagonist could partly alleviate this and possibly improve the fasting and postprandial glycemia. Since the majority of patients with T2D are overweight, inhibition of GIP-induced fat deposition may be beneficial as well. Here we summarize the studies of GIPR antagonists and discuss the therapeutic potential of the GIP system in humans.

The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical signs and symptoms of exposures to aripiprazole overdoses. We retrospectively identified all aripiprazole exposures reported to the Danish Poison Information Centre (DPIC) from June 2007 to May 2015. Information concerning demographics, ingested dose and symptoms was extracted from the DPIC database and medical records. Information on death and admission to hospital was obtained from Danish national registers. We analysed 239 cases, 86 concerning single-drug exposures to aripiprazole, and 153 cases where aripiprazole had been taken with at least one other substance (mixed-drug). The median ingested aripiprazole dose was 105 mg (IQR: 50-1680 mg) in the single-drug exposure group and 120 mg (IQR: 60-225 mg) in the mixed-drug exposure group. The most commonly reported symptom was light sedation, reported in 63% of the single-drug group and 50% of the mixed-drug exposure group. There were no malignant arrhythmias or ECG abnormalities after single-drug exposures. No deaths were recorded in relation to the intake. We found a long-term mortality rate of 13 deaths per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 7; 23 per 1000 person-years), which is significantly higher than in an age- and gender-matched background population. In conclusion, we found that aripiprazole overdoses had few and mild symptoms predominantly related to the sedative properties. We detected a benign cardiovascular safety profile and no new safety concerns. Our findings may support an increased threshold of 300 mg for hospital admission after a single-drug exposure with aripiprazole and symptoms not worse than light sedation.

In some hospitals, clinical pharmacists review the medication to find drug-related problems (DRPs) in acutely admitted patients. We aimed to identify the nature of identified DRPs and investigate factors of potential importance for the clinical implementation of pharmacist suggestions. In 100 randomly selected medication review notes, we retrospectively evaluated the clinical implementation and classified 1) timing and communication of the review; 2) DRPs and related suggestions for the physician; and 3) DRPs’ potential clinical relevance to patients as ‘beneficial’, ‘somewhat beneficial’, ‘no relevance’ or ‘other relevance’. Of 327 DRPs (0-13 DRPs/patient), 48% were implemented. The clinical implementation was higher if the medication review note was made prior to (instead of after) the physician's admission, and even higher if the suggestions were communicated verbally (instead of only in writing) to the physicians (44 versus 79%, P

Ensembl Genomes (http://www.ensemblgenomes.org) is an integrating resource for genome-scale data from non-vertebrate species. The project exploits and extends technologies for genome annotation, analysis and dissemination, developed in the context of the vertebrate-focused Ensembl project, and provides a complementary set of resources for non-vertebrate species through a consistent set of programmatic and interactive interfaces. These provide access to data including reference sequence, gene models, transcriptional data, polymorphisms and comparative analysis. This article provides an update to the previous publications about the resource, with a focus on recent developments. These include the addition of important new genomes (and related data sets) including crop plants, vectors of human disease and eukaryotic pathogens. In addition, the resource has scaled up its representation of bacterial genomes, and now includes the genomes of over 9000 bacteria. Specific extensions to the web and programmatic interfaces have been developed to support users in navigating these large data sets. Looking forward, analytic tools to allow targeted selection of data for visualization and download are likely to become increasingly important in future as the number of available genomes increases within all domains of life, and some of the challenges faced in representing bacterial data are likely to become commonplace for eukaryotes in future.

BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity is becoming increasingly prevalent and presents challenges for healthcare providers and systems. Studies examining the relationship between multimorbidity and quality of care report mixed findings. The purpose of this study was to investigate quality of care for people with multimorbidity in the publicly funded healthcare system in Denmark.METHODS: To investigate the quality of care for people with multimorbidity different groups of clinicians from the hospital, general practice and the municipality reviewed records from 23 persons with multimorbidity and discussed them in three focus groups. Before each focus group, clinicians were asked to review patients' medical records and assess their care by responding to a questionnaire. Medical records from 2013 from hospitals, general practice, and health centers in the local municipality were collected and linked for the 23 patients. Further, two clinical pharmacologists reviewed the appropriateness of medications listed in patient records.RESULTS: The review of the patients' records conducted by three groups of clinicians revealed that around half of the patients received adequate care for the single condition which prompted the episode of care such as a hospitalization, a visit to an outpatient clinic or the general practitioner. Further, the care provided to approximately two-thirds of the patients did not take comorbidities into account and insufficiently addressed more diffuse symptoms or problems. The review of the medication lists revealed that the majority of the medication lists contained inappropriate medications and that there were incongruity in medication listed in the primary and secondary care sector. Several barriers for providing high quality care were identified. These included relative short consultation times in general practice and outpatient clinics, lack of care coordinators, and lack of shared IT-system proving an overview of the treatment.CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal quality of care deficiencies for people with multimorbidity. Suggestions for care improvement for people with multimorbidity includes formally assigned responsibility for care coordination, a change in the financial incentive structure towards a system rewarding high quality care and care focusing on prevention of disease exacerbation, as well as implementing shared medical record systems.