Search

The clinical diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD), particularly type 1, can be complex because several genetic and environmental factors affect von Willebrand factor (VWF) plasma levels. An estimated 60% of the phenotypic variation is attributable to hereditary factors, with the ABO blood group locus being the most influential. However, recent studies provide strong evidence that nonsynonymous single nucleotide variants (SNVs) contribute to VWF and factor VIII phenotypic variability in healthy individuals. This study aims to investigate the role of common VWF SNVs on VWD phenotype by analyzing data from 219 unrelated patients included in the “Molecular and Clinical Profile of von Willebrand Disease in Spain project.” To that end, generalized linear mixed-effects regression models were fitted, and additive and epistatic analyses, and haplotype studies were performed, considering five VWD-related measures (bleeding score, VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, factor VIII:C, and VWF:CB). According to these analyses, homozygotes: for p.Thr789Ala(C) would be expected to show 39% higher VWF:Ag levels; p.Thr1381Ala(C), 27% lower VWF:Ag levels; and p.Gln852Arg(C), 52% lower VWF:RCo levels. Homozygotes for both p.Thr789Ala(C) and p.Gln852Arg(T) were predicted to show 185% higher VWF:CB activity, and carriers of two copies of the p.Thr1381Ala(T)/p.Gln852Arg(T) haplotype would present a 100% increase in VWF:RCo activity. These results indicate a substantial effect of common VWF variation on VWD phenotype. Although additional studies are needed to determine the true magnitude of the effects of SNVs on VWF, these findings provide new evidence regarding the contribution of common variants to VWD, which should be taken into account to enhance the accuracy of the diagnosis and classification of this condition. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02869074.

SummaryThe diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) remains difficult in a significant proportion of patients. A Spanish multicentre study investigated a cohort of 556 patients from 330 families who were analysed centrally. VWD was confirmed in 480. Next generation sequencing (NGS) of the whole coding VWF was carried out in all recruited patients, compared with the phenotype, and a final diagnosis established. A total of 238 different VWF mutations were found, 154 were not included in the Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD). Of the patients, 463 were found to have VWF mutation/s. A good phenotypic/ genotypic association was estimated in 96.5 % of the patients. One hundred seventy-four patients had two or more mutations. Occasionally a predominant phenotype masked the presence of a second abnormality. One hundred sixteen patients presented with mutations that had previously been associated with increased von Willebrand factor (VWF) clearance. RIPA unavailability, central phenotypic results disagreement and difficult distinction between severe type 1 and type 3 VWD prevented a clear diagnosis in 70 patients. The NGS study facilitated an appropriate classification in 63 of them. The remaining seven patients presented with a VWF novel mutation pending further investigation. In five patients with a type 3 and two with a type 2A or 2B phenotype with no mutation, an acquired von Willebrand syndrome (AVWS) was suspected/confirmed. These data seem to support NGS as a first line efficient and faster paradigm in VWD diagnosis.Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

The correct diagnosis and classification of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is difficult because of the variability of its clinical expression and limitations of laboratory methods. However, correctly diagnosing VWD is important for therapy and genetic counselling. A survey related to the referred VWD patients in Spain revealed local diagnostic problems in at least one third of the cases of VWD. Consequently, a Spanish multicenter study was carried out in which a cohort of 556 patients from 330 families was analyzed centrally. VWD was confirmed in 480 patients. Next generation sequencing (NGS) of the whole coding von Willebrand factor gene ( VWF ) was carried out in all recruited patients, compared with the phenotype, and a final diagnosis was established. A total of 238 different VWF mutations were found: 154 were not included in the Leiden Open Variation Database (LOVD). Of the patients, 467 were found to have a VWF mutation/s. A good phenotype/genotype association was estimated in 94.6% of the cases. One hundred and eighty patients had two or more mutations. Occasionally a predominant phenotype masked the presence of a second abnormality. One hundred and sixteen patients presented with mutations that had previously been associated with an increased VWF clearance. Ristocetin induced platelet agglutination (RIPA) unavailability, central phenotypic results disagreement and difficult distinction between severe type 1 and type 3 VWD prevented a clear diagnosis in 74 patients. A local/central disagreement over diagnosis occurred in 42.3% of the whole cohort. The NGS study facilitated an appropriate classification in 60 of them. Based on these results, a proposal for a change in the VWD diagnostic paradigm, suggesting the inclusion of the analysis of VWF at the initial diagnostic process, has been made. An extension of this project to include 400 new VWD patients has begun. A diagnostic strategy has been developed, and a Spanish consensus guideline for optimal treatment of VWD was developed in Spain. Desmopressin (DDAVP) is the treatment of choice in responsive VWD patients. VWF concentrates (VWF/FVIII) are used in individuals unresponsive to DDAVP, when DDAVP is contraindicated, or in VWD types 2B and 3, and for long term management needs (e.g., post major surgery).