Search

The article discusses the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware court case Stubbs v. Bank of America Corp. regarding wrongful dishonor of financial instrument, unlawful conversion and lien enforcements. It mentions that plaintiff Michael Demond Stubbs had alleged against Bank of America Corp. for its corrupt practices. The court after analysis had ruled out that demand of summary judgment by both plaintiff and defendant are denied as moot.

The article presents information on a case Vandevelde v. China Natural Gas, Inc. of the U.S. District Court, District of Delaware, Delaware in which class action against the defendants was brought by the plaintiff for violation of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act. Two investors moved to seek appointment as lead plaintiff and for approval of their selections for lead counsel. The plaintiff's motion for choice of lead and liaison counsel was granted, and the other request was denied.

The article discusses the Fifth Circuit Court case, Glenn E. Alphonse Jr. versus Arch Bay Holdings LLC, wherein Alphonse lost his home due to foreclosure. It states that the foreclosure was brought in the Louisiana state court filed by Arch Bay Holdings LLC. It notes that Alphonse sue Arch Bay Holdings and Specialized Loan Servicing LLC. It mentions that the Fifth Circuit remanded the district court to decide if Delaware law applied due to internal affairs doctrine.

The article provides information on the lawsuit filed by Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD) against Intel Corp. The 108-page document summary of AMD was originally filed with the U.S. District Court in Delaware on May 1, 2008 and was released to the public after four days. It claimed that Intel has unfairly used its power and relationship with personal computer (PC) vendors to conceal competition on x86 microprocessors. However, a 108-page counterargument paper was also filed by Intel on the same day. The trial is scheduled in April 2009.

Managing IP reveals the top plaintiffs, defendants and law firms in US patent cases in the first half of 2018, as well as the district breakdown. Uniloc has slipped down the plaintiff rankings, Apple is the top defendant and Stamoulis & Weinblatt has risen to the top of the plaintiff firm rankings [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article reports on the lawsuit filed by Discovery Communications Inc. against the online bookseller Amazon.com Inc. before the U.S. District Court in Delaware. Discovery Communications claims that the sale of the Amazon's Kindle and Kindle 2, as well as its electronic book delivery system has violated its U.S. Patent Number 7,298,851. Discovery Communications demands payments of damages for the infringement and other related interest which the court deems the company is entitled.

The article discusses the U.S. District Court for the district of Delaware case Temple-Inland, Inc. v. Thomas Cook wherein Delaware and the unclaimed property holder filed a joint motion to dismiss the case with prejudice, after reaching a settlement. It mentions that the Court held that Delaware's action of audit of a multistate corporation's unclaimed property has violated substantive due process.

The article reports on the move of movie-rental operator Redbox Corp. in filing a lawsuit against Warner Home Video Inc. on antitrust grounds at the U.S. District Court in Delaware. The suit, which is similar to the case filed by Redbox against Universal Studios Home Entertainment, is considered as a response to the move of Warner to delay selling titles for four weeks. It is also indicated as the effort of the operator to protect the rights of consumers to access the titles.