1. A comparison of pediatric and adult CT organ dose estimation methods
- Author
-
Jean St. Germain, Daniel Long, Usman Mahmood, Lawrence T. Dauer, Yiming Gao, Brian T. Quinn, Yusuf E. Erdi, Neeta Pandit-Taskar, X. George Xu, and Wesley E. Bolch
- Subjects
Male ,Aging ,Whole-Body Counting ,Effective dose (radiation) ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,0302 clinical medicine ,Cancer risk assessment ,Dose estimation ,Child ,Monte Carlo ,Effective dose ,Pediatric ,education.field_of_study ,Absorption, Radiation ,Radiation Exposure ,Organ dose ,3. Good health ,lcsh:R855-855.5 ,Organ Specificity ,Child, Preschool ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ,Female ,Radiology ,Monte Carlo Method ,Algorithms ,Research Article ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,lcsh:Medical technology ,Adolescent ,Population ,Radiation Dosage ,CT dosimetry ,Models, Biological ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,03 medical and health sciences ,Age groups ,medicine ,Humans ,Computer Simulation ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,education ,Models, Statistical ,Adult patients ,business.industry ,Infant, Newborn ,Infant ,Reproducibility of Results ,Viscera ,Young age ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,business - Abstract
Background Computed Tomography (CT) contributes up to 50% of the medical exposure to the United States population. Children are considered to be at higher risk of developing radiation-induced tumors due to the young age of exposure and increased tissue radiosensitivity. Organ dose estimation is essential for pediatric and adult patient cancer risk assessment. The objective of this study is to validate the VirtualDose software in comparison to currently available software and methods for pediatric and adult CT organ dose estimation. Methods Five age groups of pediatric patients and adult patients were simulated by three organ dose estimators. Head, chest, abdomen-pelvis, and chest-abdomen-pelvis CT scans were simulated, and doses to organs both inside and outside the scan range were compared. For adults, VirtualDose was compared against ImPACT and CT-Expo. For pediatric patients, VirtualDose was compared to CT-Expo and compared to size-based methods from literature. Pediatric to adult effective dose ratios were also calculated with VirtualDose, and were compared with the ranges of effective dose ratios provided in ImPACT. Results In-field organs see less than 60% difference in dose between dose estimators. For organs outside scan range or distributed organs, a five times’ difference can occur. VirtualDose agrees with the size-based methods within 20% difference for the organs investigated. Between VirtualDose and ImPACT, the pediatric to adult ratios for effective dose are compared, and less than 21% difference is observed for chest scan while more than 40% difference is observed for head-neck scan and abdomen-pelvis scan. For pediatric patients, 2 cm scan range change can lead to a five times dose difference in partially scanned organs. Conclusions VirtualDose is validated against CT-Expo and ImPACT with relatively small discrepancies in dose for organs inside scan range, while large discrepancies in dose are observed for organs outside scan range. Patient-specific organ dose estimation is possible using the size-based methods, and VirtualDose agrees with size-based method for the organs investigated. Careful range selection for CT protocols is necessary for organ dose optimization for pediatric and adult patients.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF