Search

Background: Anesthetic techniques can affect perioperative neuroendocrine function. The objective of this study was to compare 3-month post-operative neuroendocrine functional outcomes between sevoflurane and propofol anesthesia in patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETS) for removal of non-functional pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) retrospectively.Methods: Among 356 patients who underwent ETS for removal of NFPAs under sevoflurane-remifentanil anesthesia (sevoflurane group, n = 103) or propofol-remifentanil anesthesia (propofol group, n = 253), 92 patients in each group were selected and their 3-month post-operative neuroendocrine functional outcomes (primary outcome measure) were compared after propensity score matching.Results: Overall changes in post-operative 3-month neuroendocrine function compared to pre-operative baseline did not differ between the sevoflurane and propofol groups (worsened: 32.6% vs 29.3%, persistently decreased: 9.8% vs 12.0%, improved: 12.0% vs 20.7%, normalized: 9.8% vs 12.0%, persistently normal: 18.5% vs 19.6%; P = .400). The incidence of pituitary hormone deficiency at 3 months post-operatively did not differ between the sevoflurane and propofol groups (adrenocorticotropic hormone deficiency: 18.5% vs 17.4%, P = 1.000; thyroid-stimulating hormone deficiency: 10.9% vs 3.3%, P = .081; gonadotropin deficiency: 54.3% vs 48.9%, P = .555; growth hormone deficiency: 45.7% vs 48.9%, P = .768; panhypopituitarism: 1.1% vs 1.1%, P = 1.000).Conclusion: In patients undergoing ETS for removal of NFPAs, the effects of both sevoflurane-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil anesthetic techniques on post-operative 3-month neuroendocrine functional outcomes were similar, suggesting that propofol and sevoflurane can be freely used in such patients in terms of post-operative intermediate-term neuroendocrine functional outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The endotracheal cuff pressure depends on the airway pressure during positive-pressure ventilation. A high endotracheal cuff pressure may be related to intraoperative coughing, which can be detrimental during neurosurgery. We investigated the incidence of intraoperative coughing and its association with peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) during neurosurgery under general anesthesia without neuromuscular blockade. Methods: This retrospective study divided 1656 neurosurgical patients who underwent total intravenous anesthesia without additional neuromuscular blockade after tracheal intubation into high (PIP > 21.6 cmH2O, n = 318) and low (PIP ≤ 21.6 cmH2O, n = 1338) PIP groups. After propensity score matching, 206 patients were selected in each group. Demographic, preoperative, surgical, and anesthetic data were collected retrospectively from electronic medical records and continuous ventilator, infusion pump, and bispectral index data from a data registry. Results: Intraoperative coughing occurred in 30 (1.8%) patients, including 9 (0.5%) during the main surgical procedure. Intraoperative coughing was more frequent in the high PIP group than in the low PIP group before (14/318 [4.4%] vs. 16/1338 [1.2%], P < 0.001) and after (13/206 [6.3%] vs. 1/206 [0.5%], P = 0.003) propensity score matching. In multivariable logistic regression analysis after propensity score matching, a high PIP (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 14.22 [1.81-111.73], P = 0.012), tidal volume divided by predicted body weight (mL/kg, 1.36 [1.09–1.69], P = 0.006), and surgical duration (min, 1.01 [1.00–1.01], P = 0.025) predicted intraoperative coughing. Conclusion: The incidence of intraoperative coughing was 1.8% in neurosurgical patients undergoing general anesthesia without neuromuscular blockade and might be associated with a high PIP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The endotracheal cuff pressure depends on the airway pressure during positive-pressure ventilation. A high endotracheal cuff pressure may be related to intraoperative coughing, which can be detrimental during neurosurgery. We investigated the incidence of intraoperative coughing and its association with peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) during neurosurgery under general anesthesia without neuromuscular blockade. Methods: This retrospective study divided 1656 neurosurgical patients who underwent total intravenous anesthesia without additional neuromuscular blockade after tracheal intubation into high (PIP > 21.6 cmH2O, n = 318) and low (PIP ≤ 21.6 cmH2O, n = 1338) PIP groups. After propensity score matching, 206 patients were selected in each group. Demographic, preoperative, surgical, and anesthetic data were collected retrospectively from electronic medical records and continuous ventilator, infusion pump, and bispectral index data from a data registry. Results: Intraoperative coughing occurred in 30 (1.8%) patients, including 9 (0.5%) during the main surgical procedure. Intraoperative coughing was more frequent in the high PIP group than in the low PIP group before (14/318 [4.4%] vs. 16/1338 [1.2%], P < 0.001) and after (13/206 [6.3%] vs. 1/206 [0.5%], P = 0.003) propensity score matching. In multivariable logistic regression analysis after propensity score matching, a high PIP (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 14.22 [1.81-111.73], P = 0.012), tidal volume divided by predicted body weight (mL/kg, 1.36 [1.09–1.69], P = 0.006), and surgical duration (min, 1.01 [1.00–1.01], P = 0.025) predicted intraoperative coughing. Conclusion: The incidence of intraoperative coughing was 1.8% in neurosurgical patients undergoing general anesthesia without neuromuscular blockade and might be associated with a high PIP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The effect of the Mega Acer kit, a new heated and humidified breathing circuit (HHBC) containing a fluid-warming device, was investigated on intraoperative core temperature ( T). Methods: A total of 102 patients undergoing elective craniotomies were randomly divided into three groups based on the breathing circuit used: a conventional breathing circuit (group C, n = 34), a Fisher & Paykel HHBC (group F, n = 34), and the Mega (group M, n = 34). From baseline to the end of the surgery, T and infusion fluid temperature ( T) were recorded at 15-min intervals. If T became lower than 35.5 °C, a forced-air warmer was used. Results: Baseline temperatures were 36.7 ± 0.3, 36.6 ± 0.2, and 36.6 ± 0.2 °C in groups C, M, and F, respectively. T at the end of surgery dropped from baseline values by 1.0 ± 0.4, 0.5 ± 0.5, and 0.8 ± 0.5 °C in groups C, M, and F, respectively. From 60 min of post-induction to the end of surgery, T was higher in group M than group C ( p < 0.05). From 105 min of post-induction to the end of surgery, T was higher in group M than group F ( p < 0.05). The number of patients receiving forced-air warmer and total forced-air warmer using time were significantly lower in group M than groups C and F ( p < 0.05). T was higher in group M than groups C and F throughout the study period (31.0 ± 1.0 vs. 23.5 ± 0.5 and 24.0 ± 0.4 °C; p < 0.01). Conclusions: The Mega significantly reduced the drop in intraoperative T by delivering warm fluids, compared with the other breathing circuits tested. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01831843. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dexmedetomidine is a useful anesthetic adjuvant for general anesthesia. We determined whether preoperative dexmedetomidine administration could reduce the half maximal effective concentration (EC) of propofol for successful i-gel insertion without muscle relaxants. Methods: Thirty-seven patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. In the dexmedetomidine group ( n = 19), dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) was loaded for 10 min preoperatively. In the control group ( n = 20), the same volume of 0.9 % normal saline was administered in the same manner. The EC of propofol for successful i-gel insertion was determined using Dixon's up-and-down method. The EC of propofol was calculated as the midpoint concentration after at least six crossover points had been obtained. For successful i-gel insertion, all of the following four factors were required-(1) no major movement of the body within 1 min of insertion, (2) no significant resistance to mouth opening, (3) cough ≤2, and (4) visible square wave capnogram without air leakage at a peak airway pressure of <10 cmHO. Mean blood pressure (MBP) and heart rate (HR) were monitored during the peri-insertion period of i-gel. Results: The EC of propofol for successful i-gel insertion was 3.18 μg/mL in the dexmedetomidine group and 6.75 μg/mL in the control group ( p < 0.001). The incidence of hypotension (MBP <80 % of the baseline) during the peri-insertion period of i-gel was higher in the control group ( p = 0.001), whereas the incidence of bradycardia (HR <80 % of the baseline) was higher in the dexmedetomidine group ( p = 0.001). Conclusions: Preoperative dexmedetomidine reduced the EC of propofol for successful i-gel insertion without muscle relaxants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]