Search

Background: Solid organ transplant recipients are especially vulnerable to Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) due to cumulative risk factors including increased exposure to healthcare settings, persistent immunosuppression, and higher rates of antimicrobial exposure. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with CDI development in kidney transplant recipients including implications of immunosuppressive therapies and acid-suppressing agents., Methods: This was a single-center, non-interventional, retrospective case-control study of adult subjects between June 1, 2009 and June 30, 2013. During this time, 728 patients underwent kidney transplantation. Overall, 22 developed CDI (cases) and were matched 1:3 with 66 controls. Cases and controls were also matched for induction agent, kidney allograft type (living or deceased), and time from transplant to CDI result (±60 days)., Results: The majority of subjects received a deceased donor kidney (77.3%) and basiliximab induction therapy (86.4%). The overall CDI incidence was 3%. Factors independently associated with CDI were average tacrolimus trough (AOR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.00-1.56, P = .048) and antibiotic exposure for urinary tract infections (UTI) (AOR = 4.17, 95% CI = 1.12-15.54, P = .034). Proton pump inhibitor use was not associated with CDI (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.29-2.29, P = .691)., Conclusion: Maintaining a clinically appropriate tacrolimus trough and judicious antibiotic use and selection for UTI treatment could potentially reduce CDI in the kidney transplant population., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Limited data are available on intraventricular vancomycin dosing for meningitis. This study explored clinical characteristics that correlated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations. Over a nine-year period, 13 patients with 34 CSF vancomycin concentrations were evaluated. CSF output and time from dose correlated with CSF vancomycin concentration. No relationship was seen with regards to CSF protein, white blood cell count or glucose., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objectives: Vancomycin and daptomycin are the two most frequently prescribed parenteral antimicrobials for resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections. The purpose of this study was to compare antimicrobial adverse event rates and associated healthcare interventions and healthcare utilization in patients treated with the two antimicrobials., Methods: All patients aged ≥18 years, discharged home from Cleveland Clinic on outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) with daptomycin or vancomycin between 1 July 2007 and 30 June 2010 were screened. Logistic regression models were built to calculate propensity to be treated with daptomycin for each patient. Propensity score-matched vancomycin-treated controls were identified for each daptomycin-treated patient. Adverse event, healthcare intervention and healthcare utilization rates during OPAT were compared in the matched cohort using negative binomial regression models., Results: One thousand, two hundred and eighty-eight patients were identified. Three-to-one matching provided the best matching characteristics and identified 119 daptomycin-treated subjects (2518 OPAT days) and 357 vancomycin-treated controls (6649 OPAT days). The mean patient age was 56 years and the mean OPAT duration was 19 days. Antimicrobial adverse event rates for the daptomycin and vancomycin groups were 3.2 and 7.7 per 1000 OPAT days, respectively [relative risk (RR) 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.86; P = 0.02]. Antimicrobial intervention rates were 5.6 and 27.1 per 1000 OPAT days, respectively (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.11-0.36; P < 0.001). Readmissions for worsening infection or treatment complication were not significantly different between daptomycin (5%) and vancomycin (7%)., Conclusions: Patients receiving daptomycin at home have 60% fewer antimicrobial adverse events and require 80% fewer antimicrobial interventions than similar patients receiving vancomycin.

Background: The recommended treatment for severe Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is oral vancomycin alone. Combination therapy with metronidazole is only recommended in cases complicated by shock, ileus, or toxic megacolon. However, patients with severe infection are often treated with combination therapy despite a lack of data supporting this practice., Aim: To evaluate differences in outcomes for patients with severe CDI treated with oral vancomycin alone versus combination therapy., Methods: Medical records of 78 patients with severe CDI receiving either oral vancomycin alone or combination therapy for ≥ 72h were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was time to clinical cure of CDI, defined as the first day of resolution of diarrhoea for ≥ 48h without development of a complication. Other endpoints included cure rates, complication rates, and recurrence rates., Findings: There was no difference in the incidence of clinical cure between monotherapy and combination therapy (57.1% vs 65.1%, P = 0.49). Median time to clinical cure was 7.0 days for the monotherapy group and 8.0 days for combination therapy (P = 0.19). After adjustment for potential confounders, the hazard ratio of the time to clinical cure for combination therapy compared with monotherapy was 0.58 (P = 0.10). There was no difference in recurrence rate or rates of individual complications between groups; however, there was a significantly higher composite complication rate in the combination therapy group., Conclusion: These data suggest that there is no difference in treatment outcomes between monotherapy and combination therapy for severe CDI., (© 2013 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Because a significant proportion of Staphylococcus aureus strains as well as most coagulase-negative staphylococci are resistant to penicillin and semisynthetic beta-lactam drugs, the need for vancomycin and related antibiotics has never been greater. Effective use of vancomycin requires knowledge of dosing parameters and selection of target trough levels appropriate to the specific infection and to the pathogen being treated. For clinicians, it is vital to remain up-to-date with evolving definitions for vancomycin susceptibility, with new interpretations of efficacy, and with information on toxicity.