Search

Aims: This study determined the influence of age on bleeding characteristics and clinical outcomes in primary spontaneous (non-OAC), vitamin K antagonist-related (VKA-) and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant-related (NOAC-) ICH., Methods: Pooled individual patient data of multicenter cohort studies were analyzed by logistic regression modelling and propensity-score-matching (PSM) to explore the influence of advanced age on clinical outcomes among non-OAC-, VKA-, and NOAC-ICH. Primary outcome measure was functional outcome at three months assessed by the modified Rankin Scale, dichotomized into favorable (mRS = 0-3) and unfavorable (mRS = 4-6) functional outcome. Secondary outcome measures included mortality, hematoma characteristics, and frequency of invasive interventions., Results: In VKA-ICH 33.5% (670/2001), in NOAC-ICH 44.2% (69/156) and in non-OAC-ICH 25.2% (254/1009) of the patients were ≥80 years. After adjustment for treatment interventions and relevant parameters, elderly ICH patients comprised worse functional outcome at three months (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) in VKA-ICH: 1.49 (1.21-1.84); p < 0.001; NOAC-ICH: 2.01 (0.95-4.26); p = 0.069; non-OAC-ICH: 3.54 (2.50-5.03); p < 0.001). Anticoagulation was significantly associated with worse functional outcome below the age of 70 years, (aOR: 2.38 (1.78-3.16); p < 0.001), but not in patients of ≥70 years (aOR: 1.21 (0.89-1.65); p = 0.217). The differences in initial ICH volume and extent of ICH enlargement between OAC-ICH and non-OAC-ICH gradually decreased with increasing patient age., Conclusions: As compared to elderly ICH-patients, in patients <70 years OAC-ICH showed worse clinical outcomes compared to non-OAC-ICH because of larger baseline ICH-volumes and extent of hematoma enlargement. Treatment strategies aiming at neutralizing altered coagulation should be aware of these findings.

Introduction: The number of patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) is rapidly growing in industrialized countries. While cerebrovascular events comprise a significant complication, data on stroke etiology, clinical management and functional outcome are scarce., Methods: Consecutive LVAD patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke receiving treatment at an university stroke center between 2010 and 2018 were included into an institutional registry. Clinical characteristics, causes, management and functional outcome of stroke occurring within this cohort are reported. Acceptable functional outcome was defined as mRS 0-3., Results: N = 30 acute strokes occurred in 20 patients (77% ischemic, 23% hemorrhagic, mean age 57 ± 13 years, 10% female, 8 patients (40%) had more than one event). 87% of all events happened with non-pulsatile devices, on average 9 (IQR 3-22) months after the implantation. All patients used oral anticoagulation with a Vitamin-K antagonist in combination with anti-platelets. The international normalized ratio (INR)-values were outside the therapeutic range in 39% of ischemic strokes and in 57% of hemorrhagic strokes. Ischemic strokes were predominantly of cardioembolic origin (92%) and of mild to moderate clinical severity (median NIHSS 6 (IQR 4-10). None qualified to receive intravenous thrombolysis or intra-arterial endovascular therapy. 61% of IS-patients showed an acceptable functional outcome after three months. 4/7 patients with hemorrhagic stroke received immediate reversal of anticoagulation without any thrombotic complications., Conclusion: The majority of LVAD patients with ischemic stroke had an acceptable functional outcome after three months. Future clinical research is warranted to improve therapeutic strategies for acute care and stroke prevention., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The most recent years have significantly expanded knowledge regarding risks and benefits of resuming oral anticoagulation (OAC) after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). No randomized data is yet available, though several large observational studies and meta-analyses have investigated the impact of resuming OAC on thromboembolic versus hemorrhagic complications in these high-risk patients after ICH., Aims: The present review will summarize the most important studies conducted over the last years and will focus on relevant factors help guiding on decision-making on whether to start OAC after ICH., Summary of Review: Several important factors (demographic, co-morbidities, clinical characteristics) need to be considered before individual decision-making for or against OAC is employed. Existing observational data suggest that patients after ICH with indication for long-term oral anticoagulation benefit from OAC given significant reductions of thromboembolic events without significantly increasing bleeding complications. Studies even suggest that thereby also clinical outcomes may be improved. Prospective trials currently recruiting patients will clarify whether OAC after ICH - or left atrial appendage closure as a meaningful alternative - is of clinical net-benefit., Conclusions: Large sized and well-executed investigations (moderate quality of evidence) are showing that OAC resumption after ICH decreases thromboembolic complications and long-term mortality without significantly increasing bleeding complications. Further, data suggest that resumption may be safer in non-lobar ICH compared to lobar ICH, but overall, thoughtful selection, strict blood pressure control, and precise communication are paramount before starting a patient on OAC after ICH.

Background and Purpose- Whether to resume oral anticoagulation treatment after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remains an unresolved question. Previous studies focused primarily on recurrent stroke after ICH. We sought to investigate the association between cardioembolic stroke risk, oral anticoagulation therapy resumption, and functional recovery among ICH survivors in the absence of recurrent stroke. Methods- We conducted a joint analysis of 3 observational studies: (1) the multicenter RETRACE study (German-Wide Multicenter Analysis of Oral Anticoagulation Associated Intracerebral Hemorrhage); (2) the Massachusetts General Hospital ICH study (n=166); and (3) the ERICH study (Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage; n=131). We included 941 survivors of ICH in the setting of active oral anticoagulation therapy for prevention of cardioembolic stroke because of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and without evidence of ischemic stroke and recurrent ICH at 1 year from the index event. We created univariable and multivariable models to explore associations between cardioembolic stroke risk (based on CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores) and functional recovery after ICH, defined as achieving modified Rankin Scale score of ≤3 at 1 year for participants with modified Rankin Scale score of >3 at discharge. Results- In multivariable analyses, the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was associated with a decreased likelihood of functional recovery (odds ratio, 0.83 per 1 point increase; 95% CI, 0.79-0.86) at 1 year. Anticoagulation resumption was independently associated with a higher likelihood of recovery, regardless of CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score (odds ratio, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.32-2.70). We found an interaction between CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score and anticoagulation resumption in terms of association with increased likelihood of functional recovery (interaction P=0.011). Conclusions- Increasing cardioembolic stroke risk is associated with a decreased likelihood of functional recovery at 1 year after ICH, but this association was weaker among participants resuming oral anticoagulation therapy. These findings support, including recovery metrics, in future studies of anticoagulation resumption after ICH.

Objective: Oral anticoagulation treatment (OAT) resumption is a therapeutic dilemma in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) care, particularly for lobar hemorrhages related to amyloid angiopathy. We sought to determine whether OAT resumption after ICH is associated with long-term outcome, accounting for ICH location (ie, lobar vs nonlobar)., Methods: We meta-analyzed individual patient data from: (1) the multicenter RETRACE study (n = 542), (2) a U.S.-based single-center ICH study (n = 261), and (3) the Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage study (n = 209). We determined whether, within 1 year from ICH, OAT resumption was associated with: (1) mortality, (2) favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale = 0-3), and (3) stroke incidence. We separately analyzed nonlobar and lobar ICH cases using propensity score matching and Cox regression models., Results: We included 1,012 OAT-related ICH survivors (633 nonlobar and 379 lobar). Among nonlobar ICH survivors, 178/633 (28%) resumed OAT, whereas 86/379 (23%) lobar ICH survivors did. In multivariate analyses, OAT resumption after nonlobar ICH was associated with decreased mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.14-0.44, p < 0.0001) and improved functional outcome (HR = 4.22, 95% CI = 2.57-6.94, p < 0.0001). OAT resumption after lobar ICH was also associated with decreased mortality (HR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.17-0.45, p < 0.0001) and favorable functional outcome (HR = 4.08, 95% CI = 2.48-6.72, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, OAT resumption was associated with decreased all-cause stroke incidence in both lobar and nonlobar ICH (both p < 0.01)., Interpretation: These results suggest novel evidence of an association between OAT resumption and outcome following ICH, regardless of hematoma location. These findings support conducting randomized trials to explore risks and benefits of OAT resumption after ICH. Ann Neurol 2017;82:755-765., (© 2017 American Neurological Association.)

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used for secondary prevention of cardioembolic stroke. While DOACs are associated with a long-term reduced risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared to vitamin K antagonists, pivotal trials avoided the very early period after stroke and few data exist on early initiation of DOAC therapy post stroke., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from our prospective database of all consecutive transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke patients with atrial fibrillation treated with DOACs during hospital stay. As per our institutional treatment algorithm for patients with cardioembolic ischemia DOACs are started immediately in TIA and minor stroke (group 1), within days 3-5 in patients with infarcts affecting one third or less of the middle cerebral artery, the anterior cerebral artery, or the posterior cerebral artery territories (group 2) as well as in infratentorial stroke (group 3) and after 1-2 weeks in patients with large infarcts (>⅓MCA territory, group 4). We investigated baseline characteristics, time to initiation of DOAC therapy after symptom onset, and hemorrhagic complications., Results: In 243 included patients, administration of DOAC was initiated 40.5 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 23.0-65.5) after stroke onset in group 1 (n = 41) and after 76.7 hours (IQR 48.0-134.0), 108.4 hours (IQR 67.3-176.4), and 161.8 hours (IQR 153.9-593.8) in groups 2-4 (n = 170, 28, and 4), respectively. Two cases of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (.8%) and 1 case of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (.4%) were observed, both in group 2., Conclusions: No severe safety issues were observed in early initiation of DOACs for secondary prevention after acute stroke in our in-patient cohort., (Copyright © 2016 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with ischemic stroke caused by atrial fibrillation (AF) have a high risk of recurrence without adequate secondary prevention with oral anticoagulation (OAC). We investigated adherence to OAC in the first year after introduction of direct oral anticoagulants., Methods: In 284 appropriate patients, the rate of anticoagulation (AC) at discharge, adherence at 90 days and 1 year, changes between substances, and predictors for adherence to AC were analyzed. Functional outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale score., Results: AC was initiated in 70.3% of survivors before discharge. In these patients, only 8.6% and 9.9% discontinued AC after 90 days and 1 year, respectively. In 22.1%, AC was recommended but not started before discharge. Only 53.2% of them received AC at 90 days, increasing to 67.5% at 1 year. A total of 7.6% of patients were deemed unsuitable for AC, none of them subsequently received AC. Overall, 85.4% of patients suitable for AC were treated at 1-year follow-up. No independent predictors for withholding AC were identified. Switching of medication occurred in only a minority of patients within the first year., Conclusions: AC is feasible in more than 90% patients with acute ischemic stroke and AF. When initiated during the acute hospital stay, AC is discontinued in only a minority of patients. However, if AC is recommended but not started during initial hospitalization the rate of AC treatment at 90 days and 1 year is much lower. Therefore, AC should be initiated within the acute hospital stay whenever possible., (Copyright © 2015 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Stroke is a common cause for morbidity and mortality, causing substantial economic costs. Because thrombosis plays a key role in the pathogenesis of ischaemic stroke, heparins, platelet inhibitors and anticoagulants have been used in stroke management. There were high hopes that patients might benefit from the use of heparins. Unfortunately, these expectations have not been met. Instead, thrombolytics have been shown to result in an improvement of outcome in a considerable fraction of patients with ischaemic stroke. Yet, in other areas of stroke management, such as the prevention of venous thromboembolism after stroke, heparins have found their niche. In this review, we report on the currently available literature on heparins for the reduction of stroke-related morbidity and mortality, the prevention of recurrent stroke as well as the prevention of venous thromboembolism in both ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke with respect to their risks, such as the haemorrhagic transformation of ischaemic strokes.

Background: Severe cerebral venous-sinus thrombosis (CVT) is a rare disease, and its clinical course, imaging correlates, as well as long-term prognosis have not yet been investigated systematically.Methods: Multicenter retrospective study. Inclusion criteria were CVT, Glasgow coma scale ≤9, and treatment in the intensive care unit. Primary outcome was death or dependency, assessed by a modified Rankin Score (mRS) >2 at last follow-up.Results: 114 patients were included. At last follow-up (median 2.5 years), 38 patients (33.3 %) showed no or minor residual symptoms (mRS = 0 or 1), 12 (10.5 %) had a mild (mRS = 2), 13 (11.4 %) a moderate (mRS = 3), 12 (10.5 %) a severe disability (mRS = 4 or 5), and 39 (34.2 %) had died. In bivariate analysis, predictors of poor outcome were any signs of mass effect on imaging, clinical deterioration after admission, and age. In contrast, clinical symptoms on admission and parenchymal lesions per se, such as edema, infarction, or hemorrhage were not predictive. Multivariate predictors of poor outcome were an increase in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≥3 after admission [odds ratio (OR) 6.7], bilateral motor signs in the further course (OR 9.2), and midline shift (OR 5.1).Conclusion: The outcome of severe CVT is almost equally divided between severe impairment or death and survival with no or only mild handicap. Specifically, space-occupying mass effect and associated neurologic deterioration seem to determine a poor outcome. Therefore, early detection and treatment of mass effect should be the focus of critical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]