Search

The article provides information obtained during the monitoring of the spawning run of autumn chum salmon of the Amur River, conducted in 2023 near Tyr settlement. Data on the main biological indicators of autumn chum salmon are presented. Data on the dynamics of fishery indicators in the area over a number of years are also presented.

In this paper, a mathematical model is constructed that reflects the dependence of the distribution of autumn chum salmon along the spawning tributaries stream of the Amur River from fishing on the tracks of an extended anadromous migration.

Species composition and taxonomic structure of phytoplankton communities in the main channel of the Amur at Khabarovsk (Russia) were monitored from spring to autumn of 2018–2019. In total, 187 species, varieties and forms of algae and cyanobacteria were found belonged to 8 phyla (Cyanobacteria, Bacillariophyta, Charophyta, Chlorophyta, Heterokontophyta, Rhodophyta, Euglenozoa, and Miozoa) and 75 genera. Diatoms formed the basis of the algal flora (94.7 % of the total species number). Mass vegetations of the diatoms and charophytes were observed with dominance of Asterionella formosa, Aulacoseira islandica, A. ambigua, A. granulata var. granulata, A. granulata var. angustissima, Ulnaria ulna, Diatoma tenue, Nitzschia acicularis, Stephanodiscus sp., Tabellaria flocculosa, Hannaea arcus var. rectus, Melosira varians, Fragilaria capucina var. vaucheriae, F. crotonensis, and Mougeotia sp. ster. Total number and biomass of plankton algae and cyanobacteria varied in the ranges of 1.74–5724.39 million cells/L and 2.5–2648.5 mg/L in spring-summer and 0.07–0.62 million cells/L and 0.2–1.4 mg/L in autumn. The water quality was evaluated by Pantle-Buck method modified by Sládeček as the betamezosaprobic III class (slightly polluted).

Morphological signs (32 plastic and 7 meristic) and biological parameters (size, weight, age and sexual structure, fecundity) are considered for weather loaches of gen. Misgurnus inhabiting the Pad Bolshaya (Jewish Autonomous oblast), with the body length Ad 60.2-182.4 mm, body weigh 2.3-55.3 g, age 1-8 years and sex ratio about 1 : 1 (53 % males, 47 % females). Sexual dimorphism is found for antedorsal, anteventral and ventroanal distances, tail fin base length, base length and height of pectoral, pelvic and anal fins, and maximum body height. Ontogenetic variability of morphological indices in dependence on body length is detected for 26 of 32 plastic signs, whereas the dependence of anteanal, antedorsal, pectoventral, and anteventral distances, and maximum and minimum body height on the body length is not statistically significant. Males grow slower than females. Age of puberty is 4-6 years, mean individual absolute fecundity is 7409 eggs. The analysis concluded that the weather loaches Misgurnus in the Pad Bolshaya belonged to the species Misgurnus nikolskyi (Vasil’eva, 2001).

In the Amur River, there are two ecological forms of pond smelt Hypomesus olidus: anadromous and freshwater. Generalized information about biology and fishery of the anadromous form of pond smelt is presented. The smelt migrate to the Amur for spawning in winter and spring, and for wintering in autumn. The most remote point of their spawning migration is Bolbinsky cliff (375 km from the mouth). The spawning herd is represented by three age groups: 2-, 3-, and 4-year-old fish; the two-year-old fish are the most numerous. The sex ratio of spawning smelt is close to 1 : 1, though females prevail slightly. Body length of the pubescent fish ranges from year to year from 7.6 to 13.2 cm, body weight — from 3.05 to 16.04 g; females are slightly larger than males. Absolute fecundity of pond smelt ranges from 0.7 to 12.4 thousand eggs, relative fecundity — from 199 to 1287 eggs/g. During migration to the spawning grounds, the smelt practically do not feed, but they go to active feeding after spawning. Pond smelt is a popular object of fishery in the Amur basin: on average 1569.2 t were caught annually in 2010–2019, during the spawning migration, mainly in the lower Amur River between Nikolayevsk-on-Amur and Bogorodskoe.

Inventory of spawning grounds is an important tool for estimation of pacific salmons abundance and adequate management of their stocks. A set of the most up-to-date, relevant and effective methods based upon geographic information system (GIS) is substantiated, designed, developed and scheduled to implementation for inventory of the spawning grounds in the Amur basin. Abilities of GIS-technologies for optimization of the surveys planning and conducting and for processing, analysis, visualization and presentation of their results due to accelerated, simplified and enhanced workflow are shown. Three components of modern corporative GIS are presented: server, desktop and mobile ones. The system is partially loaded with the data about spawning grounds, tested for the basic operations as data collection, multi-user editing, geoprocessing, spatial analysis, cartographic visualization, protected web publication, etc., and adjusted and improved using the results of this testing for further implementation in complex fisheries surveys in the Amur River basin. Proposed GIS-technology is modifiable and scalable, so can be spread to other species and areas after appropriate modification; the GIS can be specialized for certain practical tasks.

Current status of aquatic biological resources in the middle and lower parts of the Amur River basin, including Lake Khanka and the Amursky Liman, is assessed. Generally high abundance of the water organisms is noted, but a downward trend is revealed. In 2015–2019, the total annual catch in the basin by Russian fishermen changed between 15.9–69.6 . 103 t (on average 39.1 . 103 t), with the main portions of pacific salmons (31.9 . 103 t, or 81.6 % of total catch) and smelts (5.5 . 103 t, 14.1 %). After the peak in 2016, the salmons abundance in the Amur has decreased, particularly for summer chum salmon and pink salmon, the number of arctic rainbow smelt Osmerus dentex has decreased gradually in the last 3 years. The stocks of freshwater fish are generally stable, with a slight increase for some species. The program of fisheries research «Amur River Fishes» implemented for 2020–2024 includes intensifying of traditional monitoring of the stocks and their biological state, as well as organization of detailed comprehensive studies for key species. Improvement of data quality on status of the main stocks of pacific salmons, smelts, and freshwater fishes is planned, as the basis for fisheries forecasting. Besides, the program conducts quantitative assessment of the main components of the ecosystem (phyto- and zooplankton, macrozoobenthos, and fish) and their dependence on environmental changes. State of food base for the Amur fish will be evaluated, including the feeding of artificially reproduced juveniles of salmons and sturgeons. Results of these studies will allow to improve approaches to regulation of fishery and to promote development of fishery industry toward organization of effective fishery complex in the Amur River basin.

istribution of fishes and prawns in the Amur River (40–960 km from the mouth) is described on results of the beam-trawl survey conducted in September-October, 2003 (57 trawl stations at the depth of 1.5–23.0 m). In total, 2584 ind. of 22 fish species and 1077 ind. of 1 invertebrate species (prawn Palaemon modestus) were caught. The highest species richness was registered for orders Cypriniformes (13 species) and Siluriformes (4 species). The fish and prawn stocks were evaluated as 32.161 . 106 ind. (583.8 t) for bottom and near-bottom fish and 4.887 . 106 ind. (8.8 t) for prawns. Two commercial fish species were the most abundant: catfishes Tachysurus brashnikowi (16.26 . 106 ind. or 32.9 % of total biomass) and T. sinensis (4.32 . 106 ind. or 24.0 % of total biomass); other 6 fish species with considerable biomass were lizard gudgeon Saurogobio dabryi (12.6 %), ussuri catfish T. ussuriensis (9.7 %), amur white-pinned gudgeon Romanogobio tenuicorpus (7.8 %), amur sturgeon Acipenser schrenckii (5.6 %), amur gudgeon Gobio cynocephalus (2.4 %), and kaluga Huso dauricus (0.6 %). Distribution density varied in the range of 0.01–2.57 g/m2 (on average 0.45 ± 0.27 g/m2) for fish and 0.005–0.044 g/m2 (0.021 ± 0.012 g/m2) for prawns. Abundance of both fish and prawns increased multifold towards the Amur mouth that correlated with increasing of forage benthos biomass in the same direction. So, the main portion of fish biomass (82.4 %) was distributed in the Amur River downstream (40–400 km from the mouth) and the prawn stock was concentrated completely in its lowermost part (50–150 km from the mouth).

Background. This study was initiated for the morphological comparison of two species of recently described Amur graylings collected in the unique zone of their sympatry. This provided an infrequent opportunity for the estimation of the species-specific morphological diversification not determined by environmental conditions dissimilarity. This study aimed to compare the seismosensory systems of two species of Amur grayling, the lower Amur grayling, Thymallus tugarinae Knizhin, Antonov, Safronov et Weiss, 2007, and yellow-spotted grayling, Thymallus flavomaculatus Knizhin, Antonov et Weiss, 2006, collected in sympatric habitats with the inclusion of the published data on other northeast Asia grayling species. Materials and methods. The comparative study was based on samples of T. tugarinae and T. flavomaculatus specimens collected at species sympatric habitats in the middle stretch of the Anyuy River, one of the biggest tributaries of the Amur River. The lateral line system was stained, the topology was examined, and seismosensory system canal pores were counted. Differences in canal pore numbers between examined species were estimated with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Also, cluster analysis was carried out. Results. Examined sympatric species were found to differ in the number of pores and secondary canaliculi topology but were similar to geographically distant grayling species. Conclusion. The results revealed sympatric morphological divergence of studied species and demonstrated parallelism of interspecies variability of examined features which are likely determined by conditions of species ecological optima. Comparative morphological analysis of the species and forms with questionable taxonomic status should be carried out using material that is collected in different parts of the habitation areal, paying special attention to the sympatry zones, if there are any such cohabitation regions, because the environmental factors have similar effects on all of the analysed species within such zones.

Chum salmon in the Amur River basin are represented by two races: summer and fall ones. For the summer race, one population with specific type of spawning grounds is known, but the fall race includes three populations with different types of spawning grounds. In total, four eco-geographical groupings of the species are separated in their reproduction by geographical boundaries of geomorphological zones, as well as temporally and ecologically. Chum salmon do not spawn in the Chinese part of the Amur basin in more than 50 years. In the Russian part, the summer chum salmon spawn completely in the hyporheic waters in late July — August, the major grouping of fall chum (77.1 %) spawns in the spring waters in September-November, other two groupings spawn in the hyporheic waters of the lower Amur in September (20.4 %) and in the spring waters of the lakes near the Amur mouth in October-November (2.5 %).

At the northwestern coast of the Okhotsk Sea, pink salmon finds its spawning grounds both in big rivers (Uda, Okhota, and some other) and small streams because the size, slopes, and structure of alluvial sediments of the majority of local water bodies are suitable for the spawning. In small streams (< 20 km long), the pink salmon prefers to spawn in the simplest parts of beds, with linear channel sloped enough for bottom infiltration, but the chum salmon usually does not spawn there. These environments are rare for large rivers of this area which are more turbulized, with the beds often transformed by floods, strongly meandering, highly branched, and sometimes splitted to several channels; however, the largest and the most numerous spawning sites of pink and chum salmons are maintained in the latter case of splitted river-bed that is typical for lower parts of the biggest rivers, though other parts of these rivers are not preferable for their spawning because of high instability of the environments. The spawning grounds of chum salmon are more resistible against floods than the pink salmon ones: they form around either parafluvial (hyporheic) or ortofluvial springs. Generally, the areas with underwater springs preferable for the salmons spawning are more usual for big rivers with variable geomorphology, numerous tributaries, and extended multichannel parts.