Search

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic value of interleukin 6 (IL-6), galectin 3, growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), and soluble ST2 (sST2) in an unselected cohort of critically ill patients., Methods: During a study period of 1 year, we recruited 530 consecutive patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital. We examined a combination of inflammatory, renal, and cardiac biomarkers for the prediction of 90-day all-cause mortality., Results: During follow-up, 118 patients died (22%). In univariate analyses, increased IL-6, galectin 3, GDF-15, and sST2 plasma concentrations at baseline were strong prognostic markers. However, in the multivariate models, only IL-6 and sST2 remained independent biomarkers adding additional prognostic information to the routinely used Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II. Using a simple multimarker approach, patients with increased SAPS II, IL-6, and sST2 (ie, SAPS II >35, IL-6 >32.3pg/mL, and sST2 >103ng/mL) had the poorest outcome., Conclusions: In this heterogeneous group of critically ill patients, only SAPS II, IL-6, and sST2 remained independent and additive prognostic markers for 90-day all-cause mortality. A combination of the SAPS II with the 2 complementary biomarkers might provide a valuable tool for risk stratification of critically ill patients., (Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Biomarkers are useful for establishing disease severity or prognosis in patients with chronic kidney disease. The aim of our study was to determine the plasma concentrations of novel cardiovascular biomarkers in patients on chronic hemodialysis in the context of published upper reference limits (URL) of these biomarkers; and to compare the plasma concentrations of those same analytes before and after hemodialysis session., Design and Methods: Plasma concentrations of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), mid-regional pro-A-type natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), C-terminal pro-endothelin-1 (CT-proET-1), C-terminal pro-arginine vasopressin (CT-proAVP, also known as Copeptin) and soluble ST2 (sST2) were measured in 28 patients before and after dialysis session. Of the 28 patients with conventional hemodialysis, 24 had low-flux hemofiltration and 4 had high-flux hemodiafiltration., Results: Median plasma concentrations of the biomarkers obtained before hemodialysis were as follows: NT-proBNP, 11,307ng/L (URL, 500ng/L); MR-proANP, 778pmol/L (URL, 250pmol/L); MR-proADM, 2.57nmol/L (URL, 0.52nmol/L); median CT-proET-1, 252pmol/L (URL, 75pmol/L); median CT-proAVP, 142pmol/L (URL, 19pmol/L); and median sST2, 27ng/mL (URL, 50ng/mL). Median relative analyte changes after low-flux vs. high-flux dialysis compared to predialysis values were +19% vs. -43% for NT-proBNP; +7% vs. -45% for MR-proANP; -2% vs. -63% for MR-proADM; -19% vs. -61% for CT-proET-1; +13% vs. -64% for CT-proAVP; and +2% vs. +3% for sST2., Conclusions: Plasma concentrations of the investigated biomarkers were markedly increased in chronic hemodialysis patients (with the exception of sST2). After hemodialysis session, analyte concentrations (with the exception of sST2) decreased significantly using a high-flux membrane but not if using a low-flux membrane., (Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cardiovascular biomarkers provide independent prognostic information in the assessment of mortality and cardiovascular complications. However, little is known about possible interactions between these biomarkers. In the present study, we evaluated the influence of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) on midregional-proadrenomedullin (MR-proADM), C-terminal-proendothelin-1 (CT-proET-1), growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), midregional-proatrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), copeptin, and procalcitonin in healthy volunteers. Ten healthy male subjects (mean age 24 yr) participating in a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blinded crossover study received placebo or 3.0 pmol·kg(-1)·min(-1) human BNP 32 during a continuous infusion lasting for 4 h. Effects of BNP on other cardiovascular biomarkers were assessed. BNP did not change concentrations of MR-proADM, copeptin, CT-proET1, GDF-15, or procalcitonin. In contrast, MR-proANP was significantly decreased during BNP infusion. BNP as an established cardiovascular biomarker did not affect plasma concentrations of other cardiovascular biomarkers in a model of healthy volunteers., (Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.)

Objective: The evaluation of novel biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute destabilised heart failure (HF)., Design: Prospectively conducted study on diagnostic accuracy., Setting: Emergency department of a tertiary care hospital., Patients: 251 consecutive patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnoea as the chief complaint., Main Outcome Measures: Index tests were plasma concentrations of 10 biomarkers (BNP, MR-proANP, MR-proADM, copeptin, CT-proET-1, ST2, adiponectin, chromogranin A, proguanylin and prouroguanylin). The reference standard was the diagnosis of acute destabilised HF, which was based on the Framingham score for HF plus echocardiographic evidence of systolic or diastolic dysfunction., Results: Median plasma concentrations of all 10 biomarkers were higher in patients with dyspnoea attributable to acute destabilised HF (n = 137) than in patients with dyspnoea attributable to other reasons (n = 114). Applying receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses, areas under the curve (AUCs) for BNP (0.92) and MR-proANP (0.88) were significantly higher than the AUCs of the other eight biomarkers (MR-proADM, 0.75; adiponectin, 0.73; CT-proET-1, 0.72; proguanylin, 0.68; ST2, 0.67; prouroguanylin, 0.62; copeptin, 0.62; and chromogranin A, 0.56). In multivariate logistic regression analysis only increased BNP and MR-proANP concentrations remained independent markers for the diagnosis of HF. Both markers alone or in combination added similar diagnostic information besides all clinical information available in the emergency department., Conclusions: The data showed that BNP and MR-proANP were the only independent diagnostic markers of HF. Both markers provided similar diagnostic information and were clinically useful as an aid in the diagnosis of acute destabilised HF in an emergency setting.