Search

Objectives: The optimal bridging stent for fenestrations during complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has not been defined. At our institution, the Viabahn VBX is frequently used given its availability and mechanical and heparin-bonding characteristics. This study aimed to assess the performance of the Viabahn VBX vs the iCast balloon-expandable covered stents as bridging stents for fenestrations during complex EVAR., Methods: A retrospective study of consecutive patients undergoing complex EVAR between 2015 and 2021 was performed. Celiac arteries (CAs), superior mesenteric arteries (SMAs), left renal arteries, and right renal arteries stented with fenestrations were grouped according to the type of bridging stent, VBX vs iCast. Target vessels (TV) stented with a branch or scallop were excluded. The primary end points included primary patency and freedom from TV instability., Results: A total of 292 patients undergoing complex EVAR were treated using VBX or iCast with a mean follow-up of 190 days (interquartile range, 36-384 days) for the VBX cohort and 804 days (interquartile range, 384-1507 days) for the iCast cohort. A total of 677 TVs were stented, including 134 CAs (20%), 175 SMAs (26%), 182 left RAs (27%), 186 right RAs (27%), and 12 additional vessels (2%). Proximal reinforcement was more frequent with VBX than with iCast stent (23% vs 2.4%; P < .0001). There was no difference in primary patency rates at 2 years between VBX and iCast stent for CA (100% vs 96.4%; P = .32), SMA (97.8% vs 100%; P = .14), and the RAs (96.7% vs 99.4%; P = .11). There was no difference between VBX and iCast in the cumulative incidence of type Ic and type IIIc endoleaks (3.2% vs 5.6%; P = .69) or freedom from TV instability at 2 years., Conclusions: Viabahn VBX stents are a safe and effective option as bridging stents in fenestrations during complex EVAR with comparable midterm outcomes to iCast stents. However, proximal stent reinforcement may be required with VBX stent to ensure adequate sealing at the fenestrations. Longer follow-ups and larger series are required to assess long-term outcomes and durability., Competing Interests: Disclosures M.S.B. and C.H.T. have been consultants for and received research support from Cook Medical Inc, W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., and Phillips Healthcare. M.K. has been consultant for W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., (Copyright © 2024 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Loeys Dietz Syndrome (LDS) is an autosomal dominant connective tissue disorder resulting from a mutation in the transforming growth factor beta receptor (TGFBR) family of genes. It is commonly associated with the development of aortic aneurysms and dissections. We report the successful open surgical management of thoracoabdominal aneurysms in a father and daughter with Loeys-Dietz Syndrome after failed endovascular repair. The daughter required stent graft explantation, while the stent graft remained in the father. These cases highlight the importance of early genetic testing of both patients and first-degree family members in those with a strong history of aortic disease, even when there is a lack of typical connective tissue disorder associated physical exam findings and open surgical index operations., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Babak Abai: consultant for Endologix and Cook Medical. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Open surgical repair of suprarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (SRAAA) and type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) remains a surgical challenge because of the inducted intraoperative visceral and renal ischemia. We report a novel three-step technique named debranch, perfuse, reconstruct (DPR), using debranching and passive arterial shunt to decrease these ischemic complications. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the 30-day and 1-year mortality rates associated with these DPR technique. The secondary aim was to evaluate the impact on renal function and the primary patency of the repaired arteries., Methods: This retrospective study included all consecutive patients who underwent elective surgery for SRAAA or type IV TAAA using the DPR technique between January 2011 and June 2022. In debranching, using partial side clamping, a multibranch graft was implanted side-to-end into the descending thoracic aorta. The left renal artery was anastomosed end-to-end to the graft. As needed, the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), the celiac trunk, and the right renal artery could also be anastomosed to the graft. In the perfusion step, cannulas were connected to the last branch of the multibranch graft to perfuse other arteries during aortic cross-clamping. For repair, a tube or bifurcated graft was used for the aortic repair. The branch used as a passive temporary arterial shunt was ligated at the end of the intervention. Clinical, radiological, and biological preoperative and postoperative factors were reviewed using a standardized database. Procedural complications and reinterventions were analyzed, as well as artery patency., Results: There were 40 patients who underwent DPR technique. The mean patient age was 67 ± 13 years and two were women. Twenty-three patients presented with a SRAAA and 17 with a type IV TAAA. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 2.5% (one patient). Two respiratory complications (5%) and three mesenteric ischemic complications (7%) have been recorded. No patient developed signs of cardiac or spinal cord dysfunction. We did not observe a significant change in postoperative renal function. The celiac trunk, superior mesenteric artery, left renal artery, and right renal artery bypass patency rates at 1 year were 95%, 100%, 90%, and 100%, respectively., Conclusions: The SRAAA and type IV TAAA repair with DPR technique provides short visceral and renal ischemia times with a low mortality rate. This technique could be an option to consider for visceral and renal protection during open surgical repair., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is common in patients with aortic aneurysms. Severe COPD is associated with an increased risk of aneurysm rupture and perioperative complications. This study assesses the outcomes of COPD and non-COPD patients after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (FBEVAR)., Materials and Methods: A single institution, retrospective study of FBEVAR patients between 2011 and 2020 compared outcomes between COPD and non-COPD patients. COPD patients were stratified by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria and oxygen dependence. Outcome measures included 30-day mortality, pulmonary complications, major adverse events (MAE), and mid-term survival., Results: 387 patients (71% male, age 72 years, interquartile range [68-79]) underwent FBEVAR. 181 patients (47%) had COPD. Smoking history was more frequent in COPD patients (P = .022). Among COPD patients, 20.4% were oxygen-dependent. Technical success, defined as successful delivery of the main aortic endograft and all intended side branches, was 98.4%. 30-day mortality (P = .83) and MAE rates (P = .87) were similar between groups. While not statistically significant, COPD patients had more frequent pulmonary complications (6.1% vs. 2.4%, P = .13) and were more frequently discharged on oxygen (P = .002). There were no differences in intensive care unit or hospital length of stay between groups (P = .29; P = .85, respectively). 5-year survival was similar between groups (P = .10). Oxygen-dependent COPD and severe-very severe COPD were associated with decreased mid-term survival (Hazard Ratio 2.39, P = .048)., Conclusions: FBEVAR is safe and effective for treating complex aortic pathology in COPD patients, including oxygen-dependent patients. Patients with more severe COPD were more frequently discharged on oxygen. Mid-term survival was slightly reduced in patients with oxygen-dependent and severe-very severe COPD., Level of Evidence: Level 3, non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE).)

Purpose: To report the initial outcomes of physician-modified inner branched endovascular repair (PMiBEVAR) for pararenal aneurysms (PRAs), thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs), and aortic arch aneurysms in high-surgical-risk patients., Materials and Methods: A total of 10 patients (6 men; median age, 83.0 years) treated using PMiBEVAR were enrolled in this retrospective, single-center study. All patients were at high surgical risk because of severe comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score≥3 or emergency repair). End points were defined as technical success per patient and per vessel (successful deployment), clinical success (no endoleaks postoperatively), in-hospital death, and major adverse events., Results: There were 3 PRAs, 4 TAAAs, and 3 aortic arch aneurysms with 12 renal-mesenteric arteries and 3 left subclavian arteries incorporated by inner branches. The technical success rate was 90.0% (9/10) per patient and 93.3% (14/15) per vessel. The clinical success rate was 90% (9/10). There were 2 in-hospital deaths, unrelated to aneurysms. Paraplegia and shower emboli occurred separately in 2 patients. Three patients experienced prolonged ventilation for 3 days after surgery. Aneurysm sac shrinkage occurred in 4 patients, and aneurysm size stabilized in 1 patient during follow-up, more than 6 months later. None of the patients required intervention., Conclusion: PMiBEVAR is a feasible approach for treating complex aneurysms in high-surgical-risk patients. This technology may complement the existing technology in terms of improved anatomical adaptability, no time delay and practicability in many countries. However, long-term durability remains undetermined. Further large-scale and long-term studies are needed., Clinical Impact: This is the first clinical study to investigate outcomes of physician-modified inner branched endovascular repair (PMiBEVAR). PMiBEVAR for treating pararenal aneurysm, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, or aortic arch aneurysm is a feasible procedure. This technology is likely to complement existing technology in terms of improved anatomical adaptability (compared to off-the-shelf devices), no time delay (compared to custom-made devices), and the potential to be performed in many countries. On the other hand, surgery time varied greatly depending on the case, suggesting a learning curve and the need for technological innovation to perform more consistent surgeries., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm outcomes of secondary extension of frozen elephant trunk (FET) by means of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)., Methods: This single-center prospective study was conducted in a tertiary aortic center on consecutive patients having undergone TEVAR with an endograft covering most of the 10 cm FET module with 2 to 4 mm oversizing. All patients were monitored by computerized tomography angiography (CTA) at sixth month and yearly thereafter., Results: From January 2015 to July 2022, among 159 patients who received FET, 30 patients (18.8%) underwent a TEVAR procedure (13 for a thoracoabdominal aneurysm, 11 for a chronic aortic dissection and 6 for an emergency procedure). All connections were successfully achieved with 2 postoperative deaths (6.6%) and 1 paraplegia (3.3%). At a median follow-up of 21 months (interquartile range [IQR], 4.2-34.7), 5 patients (25%) required a fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) extension followed by 4 patients with 5 reinterventions, 3 for a Type 3 endoleak due to disconnection between FET and TEVAR endograft, and 2 unrelated to the FET for a secondary Type 1C endoleak. All reinterventions were successful, without mortality or morbidity., Conclusions: In this series, FET connection with a TEVAR endograft was effective with low postoperative morbidity but with a risk of aortic reintervention related to disconnection between the FET and TEVAR endograft. These results suggest the need for annual CTA monitoring with no time limit in patients following connection of the FET with a TEVAR endograft., Clinical Impact: In this series of 30 patients, midterm outcomes of secondary extension of frozen elephant trunk (FET) by thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) showed 3 disconnections (10%) with a Type 3 endoleak between FET and TEVAR. These findings suggest the need for annual CTA monitoring with no time limit. But so far, only a few studies provide some information after one year while the risk of disconnection increases over time and becomes a concern after 3 years. This is the new message brought by our study., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: The Provisional Extension to Induce Complete Attachment Technique (PETTICOAT) uses a bare-metal stent to scaffold the true lumen in patients with acute or subacute aortic dissections. While it is designed to facilitate remodeling, some patients with chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) require repair. This study describes the technical pitfalls of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) in patients who underwent prior PETTICOAT repair., Technique: We report 3 patients with extent II TAAAs who had prior bare-metal dissection stents treated by FB-EVAR. Two patients required maneuvers to reroute the aortic guidewire, which was initially placed in-between stent struts. This was recognized before the deployment of the fenestrated-branched device. A third patient had difficult advancement of the celiac bridging stent due to a conflict of the tip of the stent delivery system into one of the stent struts, requiring to redo catheterization and pre-stenting with a balloon-expandable stent. There were no mortalities and target-related events after a follow-up of 12 to 27 months., Conclusion: FB-EVAR following the PETTICOAT is infrequent, but technical difficulties should be recognized to prevent complications from the inadvertent deployment of the fenestrated-branched stent-graft component in-between stent struts., Clinical Impact: The present study highlights a few maneuvers to prevent or overcome possible complications during endovascular repair of chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm following PETTICOAT. The main problem to be recognized is the placement of the aortic wire beyond one of the struts of the existing bare-metal stent. Moreover, encroachment of catheters or the bridging stent delivery system into the stent struts may potentially cause difficulties., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the demographic and anatomic characteristics, as well as perioperative and follow-up results of fenestration and parallel techniques for the endovascular repair of complex aortic diseases., Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 67 consecutive patients underwent endovascular treatment for complex aortic diseases including abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), thoracoabdominal aneurysm (TAAA), aortic dissection, or prior endovascular repair with either fenestrated and parallel endovascular aortic repair (f-EVAR or ch-EVAR) at a single institute from 2013 to 2021. Choices of intervention were made by the disease' emergency, patients' general condition, the anatomic characteristics, as well as following the recommendation from the devices' guidelines. Patients' clinical demographics, aortic disease characteristics, perioperative details, and disease courses were discussed. Short- and mid-term follow-up results were obtained and analyzed. Endpoints were aneurysm-related and unrelated mortality, branch instability, and renal function deterioration., Results: Totally, 34 and 27 patients received f-EVAR and ch-EVAR, while 6 patients received a combination of both. Fenestrated endovascular aortic repair was conducted mainly in AAA affecting visceral branches and TAAA, whereas ch-EVAR was normally utilized for infrarenal AAA. Regarding the average number of reconstructed arteries per patient, there was a significant difference among f-EVAR, ch-EVAR, and the combination group (mean = 2.3 ± 0.9, 1.4 ± 0.6, 3.5 ± 0.5, p<0.001). Primary technical success was achieved in 28 (82.4%), 22 (81.5%), and 3 (50.0%) patients for each group. Besides operational time (5.77 ± 2.58, 4.47 ± 1.44, p=0.033), no significant difference was observed for blood transfusion, intensive care unit (ICU) or hospital stay, blood creatinine level, 30-day complications, or follow-up complications between patients undergoing f-EVAR or ch-EVAR. Patients receiving combination of both techniques had a higher rate of blood transfusion (p=0.044), longer operational time (p=0.008) or hospital stay (p=0.017), as well as more stent occlusion (p=0.001), endoleak (p=0.004) at short-term and a higher rate of endoleak (p=0.023) at mid-term follow-up., Conclusion: In conclusion, this study demonstrated that f-EVAR and ch-EVAR techniques had acceptable perioperative and follow-up results and should be considered viable alternatives when encountering complex aortic diseases., Clinical Impact: This study sought to investigate the baseline and pathological characteristics, as well as perioperative and follow-up results of f-EVAR and ch-EVAR at a single Chinese institution. F-EVAR (mostly physician-modified f-EVAR) was applied in patients with a wide range of etiologies and disease types, while ch-EVAR was preferred for AAA in older patients with an average higher ASA grade. Our experience suggested acceptable safety and efficacy both for techniques, and no significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding any short or mid-term adverse events., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Women are generally underrepresented in trials focusing on aortic aneurysm. Nevertheless, sex-related differences have recently emerged from several studies and registries. The aim of this research was to assess whether sex-related anatomical disparities existed in fenestrated and branched aortic repair candidates and whether these discrepancies could influence endovascular repair outcomes., Methods: Data from all consecutive patients treated during the 2008-2019 period within the Italian Multicenter fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR) Registry were included in the present study. Propensity matching was performed using a logistic regression model adjusted for demographic data and comorbidities to obtain comparable male and female samples. The selection model led to a final study population of 176 patients (88 women and 88 men) among the total initial cohort of 596. Study endpoints were technical and clinical success, overall survival, aneurysm-related death, and reintervention rates evaluated at 30 days and during follow-up., Results: Twenty-eight patients (15.9%) received urgent/emergent repair. In most of the cases (71.6%), women received treatment for extensive thoracoabdominal pathology (Crawford type I, II, or III aneurysm rather than type IV or juxta-pararenal) versus 46.6% of men (p=0.001). Female patients presented with more challenging iliac accesses with at least one side considered hostile in 27.3% of the cases (vs 13.6% in male patients, p=0.039). Finally, women had significantly smaller visceral vessels. Women had significantly worse operative outcomes, with an 86.2% technical success rate versus 96.6% in the male population (p=0.016). No differences were recorded in terms of 30-day reinterventions between men and women. The 5-year estimate of freedom from late reintervention, according to Kaplan-Meier analysis, was 85.6% in men versus 81.6% in women (p=ns). No aneurysm-related death was recorded during follow-up (median observational time, 23 months [interquartile range, 7-45 months])., Conclusion: Women presented a significantly higher incidence of thoracoabdominal aneurysms, smaller visceral vessels, and more complex iliofemoral accesses, resulting in a significantly lower technical success after F/BEVAR. Further studies assessing sex-related differences are needed to properly determine the impact on outcomes and stratify procedural risks., Clinical Impact: Women are generally underrepresented in trials focusing on aortic aneurysms. Aiming to assess whether sex may affect outcomes after a complex endovascular aortic repair, a propensity score selection was applied to a total population of 596 patients receiving F/BEVAR aortic repair with the Cook platform, matching each treated female patient with a corresponding male patient. Women presented more frequently a thoracoabdominal aneurysm extent, smaller visceral vessels, and complex iliofemoral accesses, resulting in significantly worse operative outcomes, with an 86.2% technical success versus 96.6% (p=0.016). No differences were recorded in terms of short-term and mid-term reinterventions. According to these results, careful and critical assessment should be posed in case of female patients receiving complex aortic repair, especially regarding preoperative anatomical evaluation and clinical selection with appropriate surgical risk stratification., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: EG, LB, GM, MG and GF are proctors and consultants for Cook medical.

Background: Percutaneous axillary artery access is increasingly used for large-bore access during interventional vascular and cardiac procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and learning curve of percutaneous axillary artery access in patients undergoing complex endovascular aortic repair (fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair [FBEVAR]) requiring large-bore upper extremity access and to discuss best practices for technique and complication management., Methods: One-hundred forty-six patients undergoing large-bore percutaneous axillary artery access during FBEVAR in a prospective, nonrandomized, Investigational Device Exemption study between September 2017 and January 2023 were analyzed. Ultrasound guidance and micropuncture were used to access the second portion of the axillary artery and 2 Perclose Proglide or Prostyle devices (Abbott Vascular) were predeployed before the insertion of the large-bore sheath. Completion angiography was performed in all patients to verify hemostatic closure. Axillary artery patency was also assessed on follow-up computed tomography angiography. Patient-related, procedural, and postoperative variables were collected and analyzed., Results: One-hundred forty-five patients underwent successful percutaneous axillary artery access; 1 patient failed axillary access and alternative access was established. The left axillary artery was accessed in 115 patients (79%), and the right axillary artery was accessed in 30 patients (21%). The largest profile sheath was 14 F in 4 patients (2.8%), 12F in 133 patients (91.7%), and 8F in 8 patients (5.5%). Ten patients (6.9%) required covered stent placement (Viabahn, W. L. Gore & Associates) for failure to achieve hemostasis; there were no conversions to open surgical repair. Additional adverse events included transient upper extremity weakness in two patients (1.3%) and transient upper extremity paresthesias in two patients (1.3%). Three patients (2%) suffered postoperative strokes, including one unrelated hemorrhagic stroke and two possibly access-related embolic strokes. On follow-up, axillary artery patency was 100%. There was a trend toward decreased closure failure over time, with seven patients (10%) in the early cohort and three (4%) in the late cohort. There was a significant negative correlation between the cumulative complication rate and the cumulative experience., Conclusions: Large-bore percutaneous axillary artery access provides safe upper extremity large-bore access during FBEVAR, achieving successful closure in >90% of patients with a low incidence of access-related complications. There was a trend toward better closure rates with increasing experience, suggesting a learning curve effect. Application of best practices including ultrasound guidance and angiography may ensure safe application of the technique of percutaneous large-bore axillary artery access., Competing Interests: Disclosures D.S. reports grants from Cook and W. L. Gore & Associates and honoraria and travel support from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Cook, Medtronic, Penumbra, and W. L. Gore & Associates., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) reduces contrast medium use and radiation exposure during conventional endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IVUS in detecting bridging stent graft (bSG) instability during fenestrated and branched EVAR (F/B-EVAR)., Methods: This was a prospective observational multicentre study. The following outcomes were evaluated: (1) technical success of the IVUS in each bSG, (2) IVUS findings compared with intra-operative angiography, (3) incidence of post-operative computed tomography angiography (CTA) findings not detected with IVUS, and (4) absence of IVUS related adverse events. Target visceral vessel (TVV) instability was defined as any branch or fenestration issues requiring an additional manoeuvre or re-intervention. Any IVUS assessment that detected stenosis, kinking, or any geometric TVV issue was considered to be branch instability. All procedures were performed in ad hoc hybrid rooms., Results: Eighty patients (69% males; median age 72 years; interquartile range 59, 77 years) from four aortic centres treated with F/B-EVAR between January 2019 and September 2021 were included: 70 BEVAR (21 off the shelf; 49 custom made), eight FEVAR (custom made), and two F/B-EVAR (custom made), for a total of 300 potential TVVs. Two TVVs (0.7%) were left unstented and excluded from the analysis. The TVVs could not be accessed with the IVUS catheter in seven cases (2.3%). Furthermore, 17 (5.7%) TVVs could not be examined due to a malfunction of the IVUS catheter. The technical success of the IVUS assessment was 91.9% (274/298), with no IVUS related adverse events. Seven TVVs (2.5%) showed signs of bSG instability by means of IVUS, leading to immediate revisions. The first post-operative CTA at least 30 days after the index procedure was available in 268 of the 274 TVVs originally assessed by IVUS. In seven of the 268 TVVs (2.6%) a re-intervention became necessary due to bSG instability., Conclusion: This study suggests that IVUS is a safe and potentially valuable adjunctive imaging technology for intra-operative detection of TVV instability. Further long term investigations on larger cohorts are required to validate these promising results and to compare IVUS with alternative technologies in terms of efficiency, radiation exposure, procedure time, and costs., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To compare operative and long-term outcomes between patients with and without Marfan syndrome undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair., Methods: We identified all consecutive patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair between 1997 and 2022. Primary outcome was composite of major adverse events. Secondary outcomes were individual complications and long-term survival. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed. Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate long-term survival. Multivariable analysis identified factors associated with major adverse events., Results: Six hundred eighty-four patients underwent open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ninety (13.1%) had Marfan syndrome, whereas 594 (86.9%) did not. Marfan patients were younger (46 years [range, 36-56 years] vs 69 years [range, 61-76 years]; P < .001). Extent II or III aneurysms (57 out of 90 [63.3%] vs 211 out of 594 [35.6%]; P < .001) and type I or III chronic dissection (77 out of 90 [85.3%] vs 242 out of 594 [40.8%]; P < .001) were more common. Cardiovascular risk factors were less frequent in Marfan patients. There was no difference in major adverse events between groups (12 out of 90 [13.3%] vs 100 out of 594 [16.8%]; P = .49). Operative mortality was similar between groups (3 out of 90 [3.3%] vs 28 out of 594 [4.7%]; P = .75). Unweighted survival at 10 years was 78.7% vs 46.8% (P = .001). Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves showed no difference in long-term survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.32-1.99; P = .62; Log-rank P = .12). At multivariable analysis, renal insufficiency (odds ratio, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.43-3.68; P < .01) and urgent/emergency procedure (odds ratio, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.35-3.48; P < .01) were associated with major adverse events, whereas Marfan syndrome was not (odds ratio, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.69-3.49; P = .28)., Conclusions: Open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair can be performed with similar operative outcomes in patients with and without Marfan syndrome despite differing risk profiles. Operative/perioperative strategies must be tailored to specific needs of each patient to optimize outcomes., (Copyright © 2023 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Failed fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) requiring a redo F-BEVAR is a rare event. In this study, we report 2 cases of a failed F-BEVAR secondary to a type IIIb endoleak from tears on the fabric graft successfully treated with redo F-BEVAR. This is a technically challenging procedure that requires meticulous planning, advanced imaging technologies and experienced operators. Redo F-BEVAR appears to be a feasible and safe treatment option. However, larger series and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm effectiveness and durability., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr Carlos H. Timaran is a consultant for Cook Medical Inc., W.L. Gore & Associates and Philips Medical Systems Netherland B.V.

Introduction: Endoleaks are more common after fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/B-EVAR) than infrarenal EVAR secondary to the length of aortic coverage and number of component junctions. Although reports have focused on type I and III endoleaks, less is known regarding type II endoleaks after F/B-EVAR. We hypothesized that type II endoleaks would be common and often complex (associated with additional endoleak types), given the potential for multiple inflow and outflow sources. We sought to describe the incidence and complexity of type II endoleaks after F/B-EVAR., Methods: F/B-EVAR data prospectively collected at a single institution in an investigational device exemption clinical trial (G130210) were retrospectively analyzed (2014-2021). Endoleaks were characterized by type, time to detection, and management. Primary endoleaks were defined as those present on completion imaging or at first postoperative imaging, and secondary were those on subsequent imaging. Recurrent endoleaks were those that developed after a successfully resolved endoleak. Reinterventions were considered for type I or III endoleaks or any endoleak associated with sac growth >5 mm. Technical success defined as the absence of flow in the aneurysm sac at procedure conclusion and methods of intervention were captured., Results: Among 335 consecutive F/B-EVARs (mean ± standard deviation follow-up: 2.5 ± 1.5 years), 125 patients (37%) experienced 166 endoleaks (81 primary, 72 secondary, and 13 recurrent). Of these 125 patients, 50 (40% of patients) underwent 71 interventions for 60 endoleaks. Type II endoleaks were the most frequent (n = 100, 60%), with 20 identified during the index procedure, 12 (60%) of which resolved before 30-day follow-up. Of the 100 type II endoleaks, 20 (20%; 12 primary, 5 secondary, and 3 recurrent) were associated with sac growth; 15 (75%) of those with associated sac growth underwent intervention. At intervention, 6 (40%) were reclassified as complex, with a concomitant type I or type III endoleak. Initial technical success for endoleak treatment was 96% (68 of 71). There were 13 recurrences, all of which were associated with complex endoleaks., Conclusions: Nearly half of the patients who underwent F/B-EVAR experienced an endoleak. The majority were classified as type II, with nearly a fifth associated with sac expansion. Interventions for a type II endoleak frequently led to reclassification as complex, with a concomitant type I or III endoleak not appreciated on computed tomography angiography and/or duplex. Further study is needed to determine if the primary treatment goal for complex aneurysm repair is sac stability or sac regression, as this would inform both the importance of properly classifying endoleaks noninvasively and the intervention threshold for managing type II endoleaks., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The use of upper extremity (UE) access is an accepted and often implemented approach for fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR). The advent of steerable sheaths has enabled the performance of F-BEVAR using a total transfemoral (TF) approach without UE access, potentially decreasing the risks of cerebral embolic events. The purpose of the present study was to assess the outcomes of F-BEVAR using UE vs TF access., Methods: Prospectively collected data from nine physician-sponsored investigational device exemption studies at U.S. centers were analyzed using a standardized database. All patients were treated for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (CAAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) using industry-manufactured fenestrated and branched stent grafts between 2005 and 2020. The outcomes were compared between patients who had undergone UE vs total TF access. The primary composite outcome was stroke or transient ischemia attack (TIA) and 30-day or in-patient mortality during the perioperative period. The secondary outcomes included technical success, local access-related complications, and perioperative mortality., Results: Among 1681 patients (71% men; mean age, 73.43 ± 7.8 years) who had undergone F-BEVAR, 502 had had CAAAs (30%), 535 had had extent IV TAAAs (32%), and 644 had had extent I to III TAAAs (38%). UE access was used for 1103 patients (67%). The right side was used for 395 patients (24%) and the left side for 705 patients (42%). UE access was preferentially used for TAAAs (74% vs 47%; P < .001). In contrast, TF access was used more frequently for CAAAs (53% vs 26%; P < .01). A total of 38 perioperative cerebrovascular events (2.5%), including 32 strokes (1.9%) and 6 TIAs (0.4%), had occurred. Perioperative cerebrovascular events had occurred more frequently with UE access than with TF access (2.8% vs 1.2%; P = .036). An individual component analysis of the primary composite outcome revealed a trend for more frequent strokes (2.3% vs 1.2%; P = .13) and TIAs (0.54% vs 0%; P = .10) in the UE access group. On multivariable analysis, total TF access was associated with a 60% reduction in the frequency of perioperative cerebrovascular events (odds ratio, 0.39; P = .029). No significant differences were observed between UE and TF access in the technical success rate (96.5% vs 96.8%; P = .72), perioperative mortality (2.9% vs 2.6%; P = .72), or local access-related complications (6.5% vs 5.5%; P = .43)., Conclusions: In the present large, multicenter, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, a total TF approach for F-BEVAR was associated with a lower rate of perioperative cerebrovascular events compared with UE access. Although the cerebrovascular event rate was low with UE access, the TF approach offered a lower risk of stroke and TIA. UE access will continue to play a role for appropriately selected patients requiring more complex repairs with anatomy not amenable to the TF approach., (Copyright © 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Complex aortic pathology still represents an open issue in contemporary endovascular management, with continuous technological advancement being introduced in practice over time aiming to improve outcomes. Thus far, the dualism between the fenestrated and branched configuration for visceral artery revascularization is yet unsolved, with each approach having its own pros and cons. The inner branched technology for endovascular aneurysm repair (iBEVAR) aims to take the best out of both strategies, offering wide applicability and stable bridging stent sealing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early outcomes obtained with a single manufacturer custom-made inner-branched endograft in a multicenter Italian experience., Methods: All patients consecutively treated with E-xtra design devices in three Italian facilities were enrolled. Anatomic characteristics and perioperative data were analyzed. The main objective was to asses technical and clinical success after iBEVAR. Secondary end points were overall survival, aortic-related mortality, target visceral vessel (TVV) patency, and freedom from target vessel instability during follow-up., Results: From 2016 to 2021, 45 patients were treated with an E-xtra design device revascularizing at least one visceral vessel through an inner branch. The mean age at the time of the procedure was 71.1 ± 9.3 years and 77.8% were males. The total number of target visceral arteries to be bridged with an inner branch was 159. The extent of aortic repair was thoracoabdominal in 91.1% of the cases. Technical success was achieved in 93.3% of the procedures (42/45) with all failures owing to a type I endoleak at final angiography. Each TVV was successfully connected to the graft's main body as planned without complications. Following their intervention, five patients developed spinal cord ischemia and in three of these cases symptoms persisted after discharge (6.7%). At 30 days clinical success was 93.3% (42/45). No death as well as no TVV thrombosis occurred within 30 days from the primary procedures. The mean follow-up was 22.8 ± 14.2 months. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival and TVV patency at 36 months were 83.9% and 95.9%, respectively., Conclusions: Inner branches seem to be a promising technology in the complex aortic repair landscape, with an applicability ranging from type II thoracoabdominal aneurysm to type I endoleak repair after infrarenal endografting. Whether iBEVAR could offer results comparable with those provided by fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair in terms of target vessel patency and stent stability is yet to be established and further studies are, therefore, needed., (Copyright © 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Minimizing ischemic injury during surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) is vital for preventing complications such as paraplegia and acute renal failure. In this report, we describe a new technique for TAAA open repair that aims to minimize visceral organ ischemia times. Unlike typical Crawford extent II TAAA open repair, which begins with aortic clamping and proceeds from the proximal to the distal anastomoses, our method reverses the anastomosis order and minimizes aortic clamping. Between January 2016 and December 2020, we used this approach in 29 patients undergoing TAAA repair. We present one of these cases, a 29-year-old patient with progressive aneurysmal dilatation of a DeBakey type III chronic aortic dissection that extended beyond the aortic bifurcation. Our technique reduced aortic cross-clamping, left heart bypass, and internal organ and spinal cord ischemia times and appears to be safe and effective., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Open thoracoabdominal repair is the gold standard in the TAAA treatment. However, there are endovascular techniques, that sometimes may be an alternative, such as branched endovascular aneurysm repair (BEVAR) or implantation of the multilayer flow modulator (MFM). In this study, we aimed to assess differences in the aneurysm sac pressure (ASP) between patients undergoing BEVAR and MFM implantation. The study included 22 patients with TAAA (14 patients underwent BEVAR, while eight MFM implantation). The pressure sensor wire was placed inside the aneurysm. A measurement of ASP and aortic pressure (AP) was performed during the procedure. The systolic pressure index (SPI), diastolic pressure index (DPI), and pulse pressure index (PPI) were calculated as a quotient of the ASP and AP values. After the procedure, SPI and PPI were lower in the BEVAR group than in the MFM group. During a procedure, a drop in SPI and PPI was noted in patients undergoing BEVAR, while no changes were revealed in the MFM group. This indicates that BEVAR, but not MFM, is associated with a reduction in systolic and pulse pressure in the aneurysm sac in patients with TAAA.

Introduction: Thoracoabdominal aortic surgery is a technically demanding and extensive treatment that has its place in the era of endovascular techniques. To ensure the best possible outcomes, it requires a well-coordinated team of surgeons, anaesthetists, intensive care physicians and other medical staff., Methods: The authors present a series of 300 patients operated on between 1 January 2003 and 15 March 2022. Although the group included sporadic cases of severe obliterating involvement of the visceral aorta, patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) constituted the vast majority. All known organ preservation procedures were used during the operations. The thoraco-phreno-retroperitoneal approach was chosen in almost all TAAA cases; the thoraco-phreno-transperitoneal approach was used only in two reoperations., Results: In this cohort, type II thoracoabdominal aneurysm according to Crawford classification was most common (33%). This was followed by type IV (32%), type III (15.3%), type I (8.7%), type V (6.7%) and other thoracoabdominal aortic procedures (4.3%). Thirty-day mortality rate was 9.6% (2019 - 6%, 2020 - 9.5%, 2021 - 3.8%) in this group; surgical postoperative complications occurred in 36 patients (12%). Neurological complications were reported in 16 cases (5.3%), of which postoperative paraplegia was noted 6 times (2%). Temporary postoperative dialysis due to renal insufficiency was performed in 19 patients (6.3%) and 4 patients (1.3%) have entered the chronic dialysis programme. In 67 patients (23.3%), temporary tracheostomy was done postoperatively due to prolonged withdrawal from the lung ventilator., Conclusion: Surgical treatment of the thoracoabdominal aorta is one of the most extensive procedures in vascular surgery and the mortality and morbidity rates still remain relatively high. A multidisciplinary approach, sufficient experience and a dedicated team are essential for a successful outcome of these highly specialised operations.

Thoracoabdominal aortic disease is a rare but life-threatening condition that requires expert multidisciplinary collaborative management. Intervention is indicated in patients with symptomatic aneurysms or when an aneurysm reaches a certain threshold of diameter or rate of expansion. The strategies for spinal cord and end-organ protection have evolved over several decades, resulting in improved outcomes after repair. Open repair, although invasive, provides definitive and durable repair. Endovascular approaches are rapidly evolving, and the results with fenestrated and branched endografts are promising. Both open repair and endovascular repair require highly specialized expertise, and outcomes are best when repair is undertaken in an elective setting by a dedicated team. Patients with degenerative thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms and chronic dissections should be followed up closely and referred for elective repair when indicated., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Ouzounian has consulting agreements with Medtronic Inc and Edwards Lifesciences; and is partly supported by the Munk Chair in Advanced Therapeutics and the Antonio and Helga DeGasperis Chair in Clinical Trials and Outcomes Research at the University Health Network. Dr Tadros has taught courses for and received honoraria from Abbott Medical, Cook Medical, Gore Medical, Medtronic, and Terumo Interventional Systems. Dr Lyden has been a consultant with Endologix, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Centerline Biomedical, Medtronic, Shockwave, Penumba, Cryolife, and Philips. Dr Oderich has received research grants from and has had consulting agreements with Cook Medical, W.L. Gore, and G.E. Healthcare. Dr Coselli has participated in clinical studies and/or has been a consultant for Terumo Aortic, Medtronic, W. L. Gore & Associates, and CytoSorbents; has received royalties from Terumo Aortic; and is partly supported by an endowment from the Cullen Foundation. Dr Svensson has reported that he has no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Large thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aneurysms may compress adjacent mediastinal structures. We present a case of a large thoraco-abdominal aneurysm compressing the left atrium and leading to functional mitral valve stenosis after total aortic arch repair, requiring urgent open thoraco-abdominal aneurysm repair., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

A late complication of aortic dissection is the dilatation of the weakened aortic wall. The only urgent endovascular alternative to high-risk open surgery in the treatment of postdissection aneurysms is branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR), which is extremely difficult due to the intimal membrane in the aorta lumen and the compressed true lumen. In this case report, we present the first application of BEVAR for aortic dissection in Hungary. Our 76-year-old male patient underwent type B aortic dissection 13 years before, for which supraaortic debranching was followed by thoracic stent graft implantation. The patient was admitted with acute chest pain associated with a con-tained rupture of a ten centimetre dilatation of the thoracoabdominal aorta. Our aortic team recommended endo-vascular surgery due to the extremely high risk of open surgery, which the patient accepted. Following selective embolization of the proximal segment of the left subclavian artery, a complex aortic intervention was performed. A new thoracic stent graft was started from the in situ thoracic graft, followed by a branched thoracoabdominal graft, the four branches of which were connected to the celiac trunk, the superior mesenteric artery and the two renal arter-ies. We also implanted a bifurcation graft under the branched graft and a left iliac bifurcation graft due to the complex dissection of the left iliac artery system. After an uneventful procedure, the patient was discharged home on the fourth postoperative day.

Objectives: Our goal was to report outcomes of the endovascular repair of urgent thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) using the Cook Zenith t-Branch off-the-shelf multibranched endograft., Methods: Between 2010 and 2020, we collected patients with TAAAs who received an urgent endovascular repair using the Cook Zenith t-Branch (had a rupture, symptoms or diameter >80 mm). Thirty-day mortality, spinal cord ischaemia (SCI) and clinical success were assessed as early outcomes. Freedom from reintervention, target visceral vessel patency and survival were considered during follow-up., Results: Sixty-five cases were managed using the Cook Zenith t-Branch for 27 (42%) TAAA ruptures, 8 (12%) symptomatic TAAAs and 30 (46%) asymptomatic TAAAs with a diameter >80 mm. Crawford's extent I-II-III and IV were noted in 54 (83%) and 11 (17%), respectively. Eleven (17%) patients had SCI with 3 (5%) cases of permanent paraplegia. Postoperative dialysis (P = 0.04) and ruptured TAAAs (P = 0.05) were associated with SCI. Sixteen (25%) patients had reinterventions within the first 30 days postoperatively. The 30-day mortality was 14% (9). Ruptured TAAAs (P = 0.05) and technical failures (P = 0.01) were correlated with in-hospital mortality. Clinical success was 78% (51 patients). The mean follow-up was 18 ± 14 months. Survival at 24 months was 47% with no late TAAA-related deaths. Patients with ruptured TAAAs had lower survival than those who did not have ruptured TAAAs (52% vs 60% at 1 year; P = 0.05). Target visceral vessel patency and freedom from reintervention at 24 months were 89% and 60%, respectively., Conclusions: An off-the-shelf multibranched endograft is safe and effective for treating urgent TAAAs. Postoperative SCI and 30-day mortality are satisfactory for this challenging clinical scenario. The early reintervention rate is not negligible. Midterm survival is low, especially in patients with a ruptured TAAA; therefore, accurate patient selection is mandatory., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Upper extremity (UE) access is frequently used for fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR), particularly for complex repairs. Traditionally, left-side UE access has been used to avoid crossing the arch and the origin of the supra-aortic vessels, which could potentially result in cerebral embolization and an increased risk of perioperative cerebrovascular events. More recently, right UE has been more frequently used as it is more convenient and ergonomic. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes and cerebrovascular events after F-BEVAR with the use of right- vs left-side UE access., Methods: During an 8-year period, 453 patients (71% male) underwent F-BEVAR at a single institution. UE access was used in more complex repairs. Left UE access was favored in the past, whereas right UE access is currently the preferred UE access side. Brachial artery cutdown was used in all patients for the placement of a 12F sheath. Outcomes were compared between patients undergoing right vs left UE access. End points included cerebrovascular events, perioperative mortality, technical success, and local access-related complications., Results: UE access was used in 361 (80%) patients. The right side was used in 232 (64%) and the left side in 129 (36%) patients for the treatment of 88 (25%) juxtarenal, 135 (38%) suprarenal, and 137 (38%) thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Most procedures were elective (94%). Technical success was achieved in 354 patients (98%). In-patient or 30-day mortality was 3.3%. Five (1%) perioperative strokes occurred in patients undergoing right UE access, of which three were ischemic and two were hemorrhagic. No transient ischemic attacks occurred perioperatively. Two hemorrhagic strokes were associated with permissive hypertension to prevent spinal cord ischemia. No perioperative strokes occurred in patients undergoing left UE access (P = .16). Overall, perioperative strokes occurred with similar frequency in patients undergoing UE (5, 1%) and femoral access only (1, 1%) (P = .99). Arm access-related complications occurred in 15 (5%) patients, 11 (4.8%) on the right side and 4 (6%) on the left side (P = .74)., Conclusions: Right UE access can be used for F-BEVAR with low morbidity and minimal risk of perioperative ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attacks. In general, UE access is not associated with an increased risk of perioperative stroke compared with femoral access only. Tight blood pressure control is, however, critical to avoid intracranial bleeding related to uncontrolled hypertension., (Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Open surgery for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm is highly invasive. Staged repair for extensive TAAA is effective because it has low morbidity and mortality, and preserves spinal cord perfusion. An initial total arch replacement can create a proximal landing zone for thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair., Case Presentation: We performed a staged hybrid thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair after total arch replacement, which consisted of a primary open repair procedure as Crawford Extent III and IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, and a secondary thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair for the residual lesions for four patients. No spinal cord injury was observed. In one patient, the residual descending aortic aneurysm ruptured six months after the primary open surgery., Conclusions: Overall, staged hybrid repair is effective and shows low morbidity and mortality. Secondary thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair should be performed as soon as possible to reduce the risk of residual aneurysm rupture., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The development of aneurysms of thoracoabdominal aorta (TAAA) in a post-transplant patient is a rare clinical situation and requires special attention. Endovascular treatment is the most suitable option for these patients due to numerous comorbidities. Particular emphasis should be placed on the ejection fraction as one of the main criteria for qualifying for surgery. The treatment itself remains a major challenge relating to anatomical constrains; however, it is possible in select patients in experienced centers.

Objective: Complex aortic aneurysms (juxtarenal aortic aneurysms [JAAA], pararenal aortic aneurysms [PAAAs], thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms TAAAs) are treated with increasing frequency through fenestrated and branched endovascular repair (F/B-EVAR); however, the outcome of these procedures is usually reported separately by single experiences and wider overviews are not frequent. The aim of this study was therefore to report an Italian experience analyzing the results obtained in four academic centers to evaluate the predictors of outcomes., Methods: Between 2008 and 2019, all consecutive patients undergoing F/B-EVAR in four Italian university centers were recorded prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. Preoperative comorbidities and postoperative complications were classified according with the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standard. Postoperative complications and 30-day/in-hospital mortality were assessed as early outcomes. Survival, freedom from reinterventions and target visceral vessels patency were assessed as follow-up outcomes by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Risk factors for 30-day/in-hospital mortality and spinal cord ischemia (SCI) were determined by multivariate analysis. Risk factors for follow-up mortality and reinterventions were evaluated by Cox regression model., Results: Five hundred ninety-six patients underwent F/B-EVAR for 124 JAAAs (21%), 121 PAAAs (20%), and 351 TAAAs (59%). Elective and urgent procedures were performed in 520 (87%) and 76 (13%) cases, respectively. Postoperative cardiac, pulmonary, and renal complications were reported in 41 (7%), 50 (8%), and 80 (13%) patients, respectively. Seven bowel ischemia (1%) and 23 cerebrovascular complications (4%) occurred. Forty-seven (8%) patients suffered SCI with 17 cases (3%) of permanent paraplegia. Crawford's extent I-II-III TAAAs (odds ratio [OR], 13.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.77-101.65; P = .012) and postoperative renal complications (OR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.70-8.69; P = .001) independently predicted SCI. Thirty-two patients (5%) died in the perioperative period. Preoperative chronic renal failure (OR, 7.81; 95% CI, 7.81-26.31; P = .001), postoperative bowel ischemia (OR, 26.97; 95% CI, 3.37-215.5; P = .002), cardiac complications (OR, 5.77; 95% CI, 1.41-23.64; P ≤ .001), cerebrovascular complications (OR, 28.63; 95% CI, 5.20-157.5; P < .001), and SCI (OR, 5.99; 95% CI, 1.12-32.5; P = .036) were independently correlated with 30-day/in-hospital mortality. The mean follow-up was 25 ± 7 months. Freedom from target visceral vessels occlusion and freedom from reintervention were 96% and 92% at 1 year and 93% and 85% at 3 years, respectively. TAAAs (hazard ratio [HR]. 3.16; 95% CI, 1.68-5.92; P ≤ .001), postdissection TAAAs (HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.30-4.90; P = .05) and postoperative bowel ischemia (HR, 11.98; 95% CI, 1.53-93.31; P = .018) were independent predictors of reinterventions. Survival was 88% and 78% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Preoperative chronic renal failure (HR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.59-3.59; P ≤ .001), urgent repair (HR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.03-3.20; P = .039), TAAAs (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.13-3.56; P = .017), postoperative bowel ischemia (HR, 5.55; 95% CI, 2.11-14.59; P = .001), cardiac complications (HR, 3.89; 95% CI, 2.25-6.71; P ≤ .001), and pulmonary complications (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.56-3.35; P = .013) were independent predictors of mortality during follow-up., Conclusions: F/B-EVAR is associated with satisfactory midterm outcomes in a nationwide experience. A variety of risk factors should be considered in F/B-EVAR indications and postoperative patient management to decrease the risk of postoperative complications and improve midterm outcomes., (Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To report a rare case of giant aortic coarctation (CoA)-related descending thoracic aneurysmal degeneration, complicated by an acute aortic dissection., Case Report: A 57-year-old man referred with acute chest pain to the emergency department. A computed tomography angiography (CTA) revealed a CoA with a giant post-stenotic descending thoracic aneurysm (14 cm) and a concomitant left subclavian artery (LSA) aneurysm, complicated by an acute type B aortic dissection. A single-stage hybrid procedure was planned in an urgent setting. Initially, a left common carotid-to-left subclavian artery (LCCA-LSA) bypass was performed to gain a suitable proximal landing zone, the procedure was then completed with 3 thoracic endografts and 1 aortic dissection stent through a percutaneous femoral approach. The patient was discharged in postoperative day 8th without complications; the CTA performed at 1 month demonstrated patency of supra-aortic and visceral vessels, dilation of CoA site and exclusion of the false lumen., Conclusions: CoA is a congenital malformation rarely found in adults that may represent a challenge for the surgeon, especially when combined with a complication like an acute aortic dissection. This case shows that a hybrid approach is a safe and feasible treatment option even in such complex anatomies.

Purpose: To evaluate intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) safety and efficacy to detect visceral stenting issues during complex endovascular aneurysm repair through branched and fenestrated repair (B-FEVAR)., Materials and Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis of 33 bridging stents assessed intraoperatively using IVUS between January and September 2020 was performed. Ten aortic aneurysm patients [7 thoracoabdominal / 1 pararenal / 2 juxtarenal; 3 females; mean age 73 years [range 70-77 years]) were included. Eight BEVAR (5 standard; 2 custom-made) and 2 FEVAR (custom-made) were performed. The study assessed the safety and efficacy of IVUS utilization to detect immediate branch instability after visceral stenting in the case of B-FEVAR. The primary safety endpoint was defined as the absence of IVUS-related adverse events. The primary efficacy endpoint was defined as the composite of technical success of the IVUS-assessment in each target visceral vessels (TVVs), the rate of IVUS-findings divided as prompting additional maneuvers or not, and the incidence of postoperative computed tomography angiography findings compared with intraoperative assessment., Results: There were no IVUS-related adverse events. The technical success of the IVUS-assessment was achieved in all TVVs. No technical issues compromised the evaluation of the intended vessel. Among the 7 findings identified by IVUS, 3 were suspected at the angiography. In all, 57% (4/7) had normal final angiography. IVUS was able to detect a 12% (4/33) intraoperative branch instability not identified/suspected at the completion angiography. The IVUS assessment led to an immediate revision in 5 (15%) vessels. A total of 57% (4/7) of the issues were detected in patients undergoing primary BEVAR. The remaining 43% (3/7) was detected in patients undergoing secondary intervention for branch instability., Conclusion: IVUS was safe as an adjunctive imaging technique to assess completion after B-FEVAR. It demonstrated efficacy in the detection of intraoperative issues missed by angiography. Further investigations are required to validate these promising results.

Introduction: Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms carries a risk of spinal cord ischemia, the causes of which remain uncertain. We hypothesized that local anesthesia (LA) with conscious sedation could abrogate the potential suppressive cardiovascular effects of general anesthesia (GA) and facilitate intraoperative monitoring of neurological function. Here, we examine the feasibility of this technique during fenestrated (FEVAR) or branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR)., Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing FEVAR or BEVAR under LA and conscious sedation by a team at a single center were analyzed. Patients received conscious sedation using intravenous remifentanil and propofol infusions in conjunction with a local anesthetic agent. No patient had a prophylactic spinal drain inserted. Outcome measures included conversion to GA, need for vasopressors and/or spinal drainage, length of stay, complications, and patient survival., Results: A total of 44 patients underwent FEVAR or BEVAR under LA and conscious sedation. The cohort included thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (n=41) and pararenal aneurysms treated with endografts covering the supraceliac segment (n=3). Four patients (9%) required conversion to GA at a median operative duration of 198 minutes (range 97-495 minutes). Vasopressors were required intraoperatively in 3 of the cases that were converted to GA. No patient developed spinal cord ischemia and none had insertion of a spinal drain. The median hospital length of stay was 4 days (range 2-41 days). Postoperative delirium and hospital-acquired pneumonia was seen in 7% of patients. All patients survived to 30 days, with 95% alive at a median follow-up of 15 months (range 3-26 months)., Conclusion: LA and conscious sedation is a feasible anesthetic technique for the endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.

Objective: To report the outcomes of redo fenestrated and/or branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR in FEVAR) to rescue previous failed FEVAR., Methods: Retrospective review of all consecutive patients undergoing F/BEVAR in FEVAR at eight aortic centres including pre-, intra-, and post-operative data according to a pre-established protocol. Follow up consisted of at least yearly computed tomography angiography. Values are presented as median and interquartile range, and survival as estimate ± standard error in percentage., Results: 18 male patients (76 years old; range 69 - 78 years) receiving FEVAR involving two (two or three) target vessels between 2006 and 2016 underwent F/BEVAR in FEVAR between 2012 and 2019 (aneurysm diameter of 63 mm; range 56 - 69 mm). Median interval between the procedures was 53 (29 - 103) months. The indication for F/BEVAR in FEVAR was type Ia endoleak in 16 cases (eight isolated and eight combined with graft migration), one graft migration without endoleak and one migration with significant proximal aortic expansion. F/BEVAR in FEVAR involved all patent renovisceral arteries and had an operating time of 260 (204 - 344) minutes. Technical success was achieved in 15 (83%) cases. There was a failure to bridge one renal artery, one renal capsular bleed with the subsequent need for renal artery embolisation within 24 hours and one persistent type Ib endoleak despite iliac extension. There was no peri- or in hospital death. Two patients developed spinal cord ischaemia, one transient paraparesis and one permanent paraplegia. The latter occurred in a non-staged procedure where spinal drainage was used. During a follow up of 27 (7 - 39) months, three (17%) patients underwent late re-interventions. Overall survival at 24 months was 70 ± 11% with no aneurysm related death and a secondary clinical success at 24 months of 84 ± 11%., Conclusion: F/BEVAR in FEVAR is a technically challenging but feasible solution to rescue failed FEVAR. The outcomes are promising in many aortic centres but need to be confirmed by further studies with longer follow up., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective/background: Spinal drain (SD) placement is an adjunct used in open and endovascular aortic surgery to mitigate the risk of spinal cord injury. SD placement can lead to subdural hematoma and intracranial hemorrhage (SDH/ICH). Previous studies have highlighted a correlation between incidence of SDH/ICH and amount of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drained. We have two philosophies of SD management in our institution. One protocol allows fluid removal for pressure >10 cm H 2 O with no volume restriction. A second, similar protocol restricts CSF drainage to <25 mL/h. We examined SD complications and the influence of volume restriction., Methods: Patients were identified according to the Current Procedure Terminology codes for SD placement, thoracic endovascular aortic repair, fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair, endovascular abdominal aortic repair, and open thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repair between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015. Patients' demographics included age, gender, race, body mass index, and comorbidities such as hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, transient ischemic attack, diabetes mellitus, bleeding disorder, and connective tissue disorders. Management protocol was classified as volume independent (VI) or volume dependent (VD) by physician order. Postoperative complications related to the SD were noted., Results: We identified 948 patients who had an SD placed during the study period; 473 were done before aortic surgeries. A total of 364 patients (77%) underwent endovascular aortic surgery. The mean age at the time of procedure was 67.2 years, and 66% of patients were male. Thirty-nine patients (8.3%) were noted to have connective tissue disorders. Bloody SD placement occurred in 14 patients (3.1%) requiring rescheduling of the operation. SDH/ICH occurred in 11 patients (2.3%), postoperative blood tinged SD output in 94 patients (19.9 %), and 22 patients (4.7 %) had a CSF leak after SD removal. The incidence of SDH/ICH was not affected by the management protocol (2.6% VI vs 2.0% VD, P = .66), whereas the incidence of postoperative blood tinged SD output was significantly higher in the VI group (25.1% VI vs 15.0% VD, P = .006). Perioperative low-dose aspirin (81 mg) and prophylactic subcutaneous heparin did not increase the incidence of SDH/ICH. Postoperative thrombocytopenia was found to be associated with higher incidence of SDH/ICH (median 86,000 vs 113,000, P = .002)., Conclusions: Severe complications of SD placement (SDH/ICH) occur in 2.3% of SD patients undergoing aortic surgery, and the risk is higher in the setting of postoperative thrombocytopenia. SD volume limitation, blood tinged drainage, antiplatelet medication, and low-dose heparin do not affect the risk of SDH/ICH. The risks of spinal drains for aortic surgery should be balanced against potential benefits., (Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with a scallop design (scallop-TEVAR) is a useful treatment strategy to extend the proximal landing zone (PLZ), while maintaining perfusion to one or more of the supra-aortic trunks (SATs) when treating aortic pathology with an unfavorable PLZ. The durability of this approach with the Bolton Relay scallop endograft (Terumo Aortic, Sunrise, Fla) has not been established., Methods: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data on consecutive patients that received scallop-TEVAR in zones 0 to 2 at a tertiary aortic unit was undertaken. The main outcome was durability, characterized by survival estimates, freedom from reintervention to the thoracic aorta and PLZ, migration and aneurysm sac regression., Results: Between 2009 and 2019, 38 patients (71% male; median age, 70 years) underwent scallop-TEVAR for thoracic aortic pathology (n = 28, 74%) or as a part of thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair (n = 10 [26%]). The use of scallop-TEVAR significantly extended the PLZ (median, 5 mm preoperative PLZ vs 26 mm extended PLZ; P = .0001). A total of 41 SATs were perfused with a scallop, including the left subclavian artery (n = 25), left common carotid artery (n = 6), neo/innominate artery (n = 4), left subclavian artery, and vertebral artery (n = 1), innominate artery, and left common carotid artery (n = 2) in conjunction with 15 extra-anatomical bypasses. The PLZ was at Ishimaru zone 0 and 1 in 6 cases (16%), respectively, and zone 2 in 26 cases (68%). Technical success was 98%. The 30-day mortality was 5% (2/38; 1 death from myocardial infarction and 1 from multiorgan failure). A minor stroke occurred in three patients (8%) and temporary spinal cord ischemia in two patients (5%). The median follow-up was 4.5 years (range, 0-10.53 years) during which two patients (5%) developed type Ia endoleak and required intervention to the PLZ (one from device-related migration and one from disease progression). All-cause and aorta-related survival were 72% and 85% and freedom from thoracic and PLZ reintervention was 92% and 97%, respectively. There were no cases of early or late thoracic aortic rupture, retrograde type A aortic dissection or SAT occlusion., Conclusions: Scallop-TEVAR offers a less invasive treatment option to extend the seal zone in selected patients with an unfavorable PLZ, allowing for a durable repair in terms of overall survival and reintervention. Periprocedural stroke remains a principle concern., (Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In the present study, we sought to discern the effects of splanchnic occlusive disease (SOD; renal, superior mesenteric, and/or celiac axis arteries) on spinal cord injury (SCI; paraparesis or paraplegia) and major adverse events (MAE) after descending thoracic aneurysm (DTA) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) open repair., Methods: Patients who had undergone DTA/TAAA repair at our institution were dichotomized according to the presence of SOD, which was investigated as a predictive factor of our primary (SCI) and secondary (operative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, tracheostomy, de novo dialysis, MAE, survival) endpoints. Risk adjustment used both propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression., Results: From July 1997 to October 2019, 888 patients had undergone DTA/TAAA repair, of whom 19 were excluded from our analysis for missing data. SOD was absent in 712 patients and present in 157 patients. The patients with SOD had presented with a greater incidence of preoperative renal impairment (61 [38.9%] vs 175 [24.6%]; P < .01) and peripheral arterial disease (60 [38.2%] vs 162 [22.8%]; P < .01] and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (45%; interquartile range, 10%; vs 50%; interquartile range, 4%; P < .01). The etiology of aortic disease was more frequently dissection in the SOD group (56.1% vs 43.7%) and more frequently nondissecting aneurysm in the non-SOD group (56.3% vs 43.9%; P < .01). Patients without SOD had presented with aneurysms more cranially located (DTA, 34.0% vs 7.6%; extent I TAAA, 44.0% vs 7.6%). In contrast, patients with SOD had presented with aneurysms more caudally located (extent II TAAA, 36.9% vs 8.6%; extent III TAAA, 30.6% vs 11.0%; extent IV TAAA, 17.2% vs 2.5%; P < .01). Propensity score matching led to 144 pairs, with SOD significantly associated with SCI (10 [6.9%] vs 2 [1.4%]; P = .03) and MAE (47 [32.6%] vs 26 [15%]; P < .01). Ten-year survival was reduced in those with SOD (31.5% vs 45.2%; P < .01). Conditional multivariable regression confirmed SOD to be a predictor of SCI in the matched sample (odds ratio, 6.60; P = .02)., Conclusions: Our results have shown that SOD is a significant predictor of SCI in patients undergoing open DTA/TAAA repair. The investigation of measures to prolong neuronal ischemia tolerance (eg, hypothermia) is warranted for such patients., (Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Open repair of complex aortic aneurysms is frequently not an option for octogenarians because of prohibitive surgical risks. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR) in octogenarians (≥80 years old) compared with nonoctogenarians (<80 years old)., Methods: We reviewed 893 patients with pararenal or extent I to V thoracoabdominal aneurysms, enrolled in six prospective physician-sponsored investigational device exemption studies from 2012 to 2018. All patients were treated with either company-manufactured off-the-shelf or patient-specific F-BEVAR stent grafts. Data analyzed included demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, history of active cancer, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, aortic anatomy characteristics, and procedural data. End points included mortality, major adverse events (all-cause mortality, stroke, paralysis, acute kidney injury [RIFLE criteria], dialysis, myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, and bowel ischemia), technical success, hospital length of stay, target artery instability (occlusion/stenosis, endoleak, rupture or death), and secondary interventions., Results: During the study period, 195 octogenarian patients (22%) and 698 (78%) nonoctogenarian patients were treated with F-BEVAR. Octogenarians presented more frequently with a history of cancer (17% vs 11%; P = .01), whereas nonoctogenarians more frequently had hyperlipidemia (76% vs 65%; P = .003), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (42% vs 33%; P = .04) and American Society of Anesthesiologists class III to V (78% vs 70%; P = .02). Male sex was similar between groups (68% [octogenarians] vs 70% [nonoctogenarians]; P = .62). Octogenarians had a larger mean aneurysm diameter (67 ± 1 mm vs 65 ± 1 mm; P = .002). The thoracoabdominal classification and the use of upper extremity access were similar between groups. Estimated blood loss was also similar (484 ± 454 mL [octogenarian] vs 416 ± 457 mL [nonoctogenarian]; P = .07). Octogenarians had an increased mean number of vessels incorporated into the repair (3.1 ± 1.4 vs 2.7 ± 1.7; P < .001). The technical success rate was 99% for octogenarians and 97% for nonoctogenarians (P = .19). The 30-day mortality rate was 0.5% for octogenarians and 1.3% for the nonoctogenarians (P = .70). Major adverse events (9.2% vs 9.7%), types I/III endoleak (4.6% vs 2.4%) access complication (3.1% vs 3.3%), and length of stay (8.2 ± 27 days vs 5.7 ± 6.3 days) were all similar between the groups. Freedom from target artery instability and freedom from secondary interventions at 3 years were similar between the groups. Octogenarian survival was lower at 3 years compared with nonoctogenarians on univariate analysis (log-rank P < .01) and on multivariable analysis after adjusting for history of active cancer, hyperlipidemia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease., Conclusions: Despite small differences in demographics, anatomic factors, and procedural data, F-BEVAR was safe and effective with nearly identical early outcomes in octogenarians in these experienced aortic centers. More extensive clinical experience and longer follow-up are needed to better delineate factors impacting longer term mortality., (Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: We investigated the effect of the length and tortuosity of directional branches on the mid-term outcomes of branched endovascular aneurysm repair (BEVAR) for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA)., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed single-center data of consecutive patients who had undergone BEVAR for TAAA from 2015 to 2019. Three-dimensional computed tomography angiogram reconstructions (Aquarius iNtuition software; TeraRecon, Durham, NC) of the first postoperative imaging studies were used to measure the branch total length (TL), branch vertical length (VL), and branch tortuosity index (TI). The branch TL was measured as the centerline distance between the branch proximal radiopaque marker and the distal edge of the bridging stent. The VL was measured as the centerline distance between the branch distal radiopaque marker and the origin of the target artery. The TI was measured in accordance with the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standard. The primary end point was freedom from branch instability, defined as any branch-related death, occlusion, or rupture and any reintervention for stenosis, endoleak, or disconnection. Cox proportional hazards were used to identify predictors of branch instability. A penalized spline function was used to identify the relationship between branch instability and the branch TL and VL., Results: Postimplantation analysis was conducted on 32 TAAAs (extent I-III, n = 18 [56%]; extent IV, n = 14 [44%]), with 123 arteries included through a directional branch. A covered self-expanding bridging stent was used in all cases. Intraoperative reinforcement with an additional bare metal stent was performed in 85 cases (69%). The overall freedom from branch instability at 3 years was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81%-94%). Five cases of occlusion and eight cases of branch-related endoleak occurred. A concomitant endoleak and severe stenosis requiring intervention developed in three cases. The Cox model with splines showed that the minimal risk of branch instability was achieved with a branch TL of 60 to 100 mm (P = .002) and a branch VL of 25 to 50 mm (P = .038). A TI of >1.15 was a predictor of branch complications (hazard ratio [HR], 8.6; 95% CI, 2.4-31.4; P < .001). After multivariate analysis, aneurysm diameter (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.03-1.15; P = .003), TI >1.15 (HR, 6.81; 95% CI, 2.17-27.33; P < .001), and TL <60 or >100 mm (P = .002) were significantly associated with branch instability., Conclusions: The branch length and TI seemed to play an important role in BEVAR outcomes. The lowest branch instability rates were obtained with a branch TL of 60 to 100 mm, and this should be considered during planning and implantation. A branch TI >1.15 might require a more strict monitoring to prevent mid- and long-term complications., (Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To demonstrate an off-the-shelf multibranched (t-Branch) modification to allow intercostal arteries preservation during juxtarenal, pararenal, paravisceral, and extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Technique: The t-Branch is an off-the-shelf device not customized for specific patient anatomy and may be offered for urgent endovascular repair for patients with complex aortic aneurysms. However, a concern when treating patients who do not aneurysms extending above the celiac axis is that the more proximal extension which is required with this device may render patients at high risk for spinal cord injury. We report a novel technique with t-Branch modification performing a 180° fabric back windows at the first 2 sealing stents that allow perfusion to the intercostal arteries. Conclusion: T-Branch-PIA (preserving intercostal arteries) modification limits intercostal arteries coverage while optimizing proximal seal zone in juxtarenal, pararenal, paravisceral, and extent IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms, thereby may decrease the risk of spinal cord injury.

Objective: Target artery stenosis might affect the outcomes of fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (F-BEVAR). The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of preoperative stenosis of the celiac artery (CA) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) on the target artery outcomes after F-BEVAR., Methods: During a 4-year period, 287 consecutive patients, 204 men (71%) and 83 women (29%), had undergone F-BEVAR using fenestrated (83%), fenestrated-branched (4.5%), branched (3.5%), and off-the-shelf t-Branch (9%) devices (Cook Medical Inc, Bloomington, Ind). Preoperative SMA and CA significant stenosis was defined as a computed tomography angiography-based intraluminal diameter reduction >50%. The primary endpoints included primary patency, freedom from target vessel instability, and patient survival., Results: The median patient age was 71 years (interquartile range, 67-77 years). Suprarenal (36%), juxtarenal (25%), and thoracoabdominal (39%) aortic aneurysms were treated. The technical success rate was 99%. The 30-day survival was 97%. Among 981 stented vessels, 179 (18%) were CAs and 270 (27.5%) were SMAs. Significant preoperative CA stenosis was identified in 39 patients (22%) and SMA stenosis in 24 (9%). The median follow-up was 29.9 months. The primary patency rates at 12, 36, and 60 months were 98%, 92%, and 92% for the CA and 99%, 98%, and 98% for the SMA, respectively. Primary patency was significantly lower in the patients with previous significant CA stenosis than in those without stenosis (83%, 83%, and 76% vs 100%, 100%, and 97% at 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively; P < .01). Freedom from celiac branch instability was also significantly lower among patients with significant stenosis (84%, 84%, and 76% vs 100%, 93%, and 93% at 12, 36, and 60 months; P < .01). The presence of significant SMA stenosis did not affect either primary patency or freedom from target vessel instability. The survival rates at 12, 36, and 60 months were significantly lower for the patients with CA stenosis than for those without stenosis (67%, 61%, and 55% vs 90%, 84%, and 82%, respectively; P < .01). Similarly, lower survival rates were observed for patients with significant SMA stenosis (70%, 60%, and 60% vs 87%, 79%, and 78% at 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively; P = .04)., Conclusions: F-BEVAR was associated with overall primary patency rates >90% for the CA and SMA. Preoperative CA stenosis was associated with lower primary patency and freedom from target vessel instability. In contrast, neither SMA branch primary patency nor freedom from target vessel instability were affected by preoperative SMA stenosis. We found visceral artery stenosis was a marker of atherosclerosis burden associated with reduced mid- and long-term patient survival., (Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most devastating complications of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) is routinely used to prevent and to treat SCI during open TAAA repair. However, the risks and benefits of CSFD during fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/B-EVAR) are unclear. This study aimed to determine the risk of SCI after F/B-EVAR and to assess the risks and benefits of CSFD., Methods: We analyzed 106 consecutive patients with TAAAs treated with F/B-EVAR from 2014 to 2019 in a prospective physician-sponsored investigational device exemption study (G130193). Data were collected prospectively and audited by an independent external monitor. All patients were treated with Cook manufactured patient-specific F/B-EVAR devices or the Cook t-Branch devices (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind). CSFD was used at the discretion of the principal investigator. Risk factors for SCI were identified, and CSFD complications were assessed., Results: Prophylactic CSFD was used in 78 patients (73.6%), and 28 patients (26.4%) underwent F/B-EVAR without CSFD. Four patients (3.8%) with prophylactic CSFD developed SCI, including two patients (1.9%) with permanent paraplegia (Tarlov grade 1-2) and two patients (1.9%) with paraparesis (Tarlov grade 3). Multivariate analysis revealed that greater extent of thoracic aortic coverage (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.11; P = .02) and intraoperative blood loss (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.002; P = .04) were the significant risk factors for SCI. Six patients (7.6% [6/78]) experienced major CSFD-related complications, including subarachnoid hemorrhage in 2.6% (2), spinal hematoma in 2.6% (2), cerebellar hemorrhage in 1.3% (1), and spinal drain fracture requiring surgical laminectomy in 1.3% (1). Minor CSFD-related complications occurred in 20 patients (25.6% [20/78]), including paresthesia during CSFD insertion (10), minimal bloody cerebrospinal fluid (7), drain malfunction (2), and reflex hypotension (1). Technical difficulties during CSFD catheter placement were noted in seven patients (9.0%). Excluding four patients with SCI, intensive care unit stay was 3.3 ± 4.0 days in the CSFD group vs 1.2 ± 0.9 days in the no-CSFD group (P = .007). Total hospital length of stay was 6.0 ± 4.9 days in the CSFD group vs 3.5 ± 1.9 days in the no-CSFD group (P = .01)., Conclusions: The incidence of SCI after F/B-EVAR with selective CSFD was low, and risk factors for SCI were greater with extent of thoracic aortic coverage and intraoperative blood loss. However, the incidence of major CSFD-related complications exceeded the incidence of SCI, and CSFD significantly increased both intensive care unit and total hospital length of stay. Therefore, routine prophylactic CSFD may not be justified, and a prospective randomized trial of CSFD in patients undergoing F/B-EVAR seems appropriate., (Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The article deals with immediate and medium-term results of hybrid and endovascular treatment of 74 patients with various pathologies of the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta (31 with aneurysms, 43 with thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic dissections). Elective and emergency interventions were performed in 49 and 25 patients, respectively. Endoprosthetic repair of the arch, descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta was performed in 25 patients, hybrid operations in 47 subjects (open switch of brachiocephalic, visceral and renal arteries followed by aortic endoprosthetic repair - 37, endovascular methods of making a landing zone - 12). The duration of the follow-up period after discharge from hospital amounted to 24.9±16.3 months. The technical success level was 98.6%. The overall hospital mortality rate was 11% (n=8), elective - 4% (n=2), emergency - 24% (n=6). Eight patients underwent repeat interventions on the thoracic and thoracoabdominal aorta. The 5-year cumulative survival rate was 82.3%, with freedom from repeat interventions amounting to 51.3%. Hybrid operations on the arch and descending thoracic aorta are considered to be a relatively safe and effective method of treatment. Follow-up and timely treatment of remote complications after hybrid or endovascular operations are obligatory for improving the results.

Presented in the article is a clinical case report regarding management of an 82-year-old female patient with late complications after staged treatment for an aneurysm of the descending and abdominal portions of the aorta, with the first stage consisting in endoprosthetic repair of the descending aortic portion and the second stage (after 4 months) in endoprosthetic repair of the abdominal aortic portion. Outpatient computed tomography performed 9 months after endoprosthetic repair of the abdominal aorta revealed an increase in aortic diameter over the distance between two stent grafts in the thoracic and abdominal aortic portions from 44 mm to 76 mm. In May 2019, a repeat operation was performed: resection of the aneurysm of the distal portion of the descending aorta on temporary subclavian-femoral and prosthesis-femoral shunts, with dissection of part of the thoracic stent graft, followed by formation of a proximal anastomosis between the endoprosthesis and a 30-mm linear Dacron prosthesis, and a distal anastomosis above the celiac trunk. The woman was discharged on POD 16. Follow-up computed tomography performed 8 months later demonstrated a type II endoleak from the inferior mesenteric artery and growth of the abdominal aortic aneurysm, thus requiring embolization of the ostium of the inferior mesenteric artery via the system of the superior mesenteric artery, with a good clinical effect and a decrease in the diameter of the aortic abdominal aneurysm.

Introduction: aortic aneurysms involving the renal and visceral arteries are endovascular challenges, especially for emergencies. We report a case of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) in a morbidly obese 71-year-old man. The patient was admitted with a stable hemodynamic state. A computed tomography angiogram (CTA) revealed a contained ruptured TAAA with an occluded celiac trunk and left renal artery due to previous nephrectomy. Due to the emergency and his comorbidities, we performed an endovascular aortic repair with the sandwich technique and 2 chimneys. Two bridging stents (chimneys) were deployed between the aorta and the target vessels (superior mesenteric and right renal arteries) in a space created in-between 2 aortic straight endografts. Ten days postoperative, acute renal failure appeared and right renal stent occlusion was diagnosed on CTA. Unfortunately, no adequate kidney revascularization could be obtained, requiring permanent hemodialysis. At a 3-month follow-up visit, the patient did well with stable aneurysm dimensions., Conclusions: encouraging outcomes of chimney-EVAR techniques, comparable to those in published reports of fenestrated-EVAR and branched-EVAR, support this procedure as a valid off-the-shelf available alternative in emergency situations. Nevertheless, only few midterm results achieved are actually available and long-term outcomes are actually unknown.

Background: Contrast-induced nephropathy is a possible adverse event in fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR). Automated carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) angiography has been proposed as an alternative to iodinated contrast medium (ICM) for standard endovascular aneurysm repair; however, its use in FEVAR has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was to analyze the possibility of reducing the amount of procedural ICM during FEVAR by combining CO 2 with intraprocedural three-dimensional preoperative computed tomography angiography images overlaid on two-dimensional live fluoroscopy images (fusion imaging [FI])., Methods: Between January and April 2018, juxtarenal and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms and type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing FEVAR with a CO 2  + FI protocol were prospectively collected and compared with FEVAR cases treated with standard procedural imaging (ICM + FI) between June and December 2017. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed. Amount of ICM, procedure and fluoroscopy time, total radiation dose (dose-area product), endoleaks, and technical success (defined as absence of type I or type III endoleak and target visceral vessel patency at completion angiography) were assessed. The 30-day renal function worsening (estimated glomerular filtration rate reduction >25% of the preoperative value) and 6-month reinterventions were also considered. Analysis was done by Fisher exact and Mann-Whitney tests., Results: Forty-five patients were enrolled, 15 (33%) managed by CO 2  + FI and 30 (67%) by ICM + FI. The two groups were homogeneous in their clinical, anatomic, and endograft features. Median ICM administration was significantly lower in CO 2  + FI compared with ICM + FI (41 mL [interquartile range (IQR), 26 mL] vs 138.5 mL [IQR, 88 mL]; P = .001). There was no difference in median procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and dose-area product between CO 2  + FI and ICM + FI. Intraoperative type I or type III endoleak detection was similar (P = 1) in CO 2  + FI (7%) and ICM + FI (7%), with immediate repair and technical success achieved in all cases. Early type II endoleak did not differ in the two groups (CO 2  + FI, 27%; ICM + FI, 20%; P = .7). Postoperative renal function deteriorated in two patients (13%) in the CO 2  + FI group vs eight patients (27%) in the ICM + FI group (P = .04). The median increase of postoperative creatinine concentration was smaller in the CO 2  + FI group than in the ICM + FI group (0.09 mg/dL [IQR, 0.03 mg/dL] vs 0.3 mg/dL [IQR, 0.4 mg/dL]; P = .04). The median hospitalization time was shorter in the CO 2  + FI group (5 days [IQR, 1 day] vs 8 days [IQR, 4 days]; P = .002). No reintervention was necessary at 30-day and 6-month follow-up in either group., Conclusions: CO 2  + FI is safe and effective in FEVAR and allows the amount of ICM to be significantly reduced, leading to shorter hospitalization time and better renal function preservation at 30 days. Technical success, procedure and fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and 6-month reinterventions are comparable with those of the standard ICM imaging protocol for FEVAR. Based on this preliminary experience, CO 2  + FI may be proposed as an effective tool to reduce the overall amount of procedural ICM, with consequent benefits on perioperative renal function., (Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In the present study, we reviewed the 30-day and 1-year clinical results of the use of the investigational unitary manifold (UM) stent graft system (Sanford Health, Sioux Falls SDak) for the repair of Crawford type IV, pararenal, paravisceral, juxtarenal, and short-neck infrarenal aneurysms (<10 mm)., Methods: The present study was a single-center, multiarm, prospective review of the first 44 patients who had undergone repair of Crawford type IV, pararenal, juxtarenal, and short-neck infrarenal aneurysms (<10 mm) using the physician-modified UM under a physician-sponsored investigational device exemption. The primary end point was freedom from major adverse events at 30 days, including all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, paraplegia, bowel ischemia, respiratory failure, and renal failure., Results: Technical success was achieved in all 44 patients (100%), with a large number of these patients having undergone previous aortic repair (20 of 44; 45.5%). All the intended 170 visceral vessels (100%) had been successfully cannulated and stent grafted. No episodes of paraplegia or in-hospital deaths were recorded. One patient had died of aneurysm-related ischemic stroke (2.3%). The rate of transient nonclinically significant spinal cord ischemia was 4.5%. At the last follow-up, one reintervention had been required owing to branch patency from a thrombotic event. Of the 170 bridging stent grafts, 169 have remained patent through a mean follow-up of 8.8 months (range, 0-36 months). No type I or III endoleaks, migration, or component separation in the investigational device has occurred., Conclusions: The early and midterm results with the use of the UM suggest it could be a viable option for the repair of Crawford type IV, pararenal, paravisceral, juxtarenal, and short-neck infrarenal aneurysms (<10 mm) without exposing patients to the increased risk of permanent spinal cord ischemia, renal failure, visceral vessel ischemia, or aneurysm-related mortality that results from open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. The high technical success rate, in native and previous repairs, supports the utility of this device as a bail-out technique for failed endovascular aneurysm repair or proximal extension of disease after previous aortic repair. However, experience is limited, and this approach requires further study before widespread adoption., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze outcomes of fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR) for treatment of postdissection and degenerative thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs)., Methods: We reviewed the clinical data of 240 patients with extent I to extent III TAAAs enrolled in seven prospective physician-sponsored investigational device exemption studies from 2014 to 2017. All patients had manufactured off-the-shelf or patient-specific fenestrated-branched stent grafts used to target 888 renal-mesenteric arteries with a mean of 3.7 vessels per patient. End points included mortality, major adverse events (any-cause mortality, stroke, paralysis, dialysis, myocardial infarction, respiratory failure, bowel ischemia, and estimated blood loss >1 L), technical success, target artery patency, target artery instability, occlusion or stenosis, endoleak, rupture or death, reintervention, and renal function deterioration., Results: There were 50 patients (21%) treated for postdissection TAAAs and 190 (79%) who had degenerative TAAAs. Postdissection TAAA patients were significantly younger (67 ± 9 years vs 74 ± 8 years; P < .001), were more often male (76% vs 52%; P = .002), and had more prior aortic repairs (84% vs 67%; P = .02) and larger renal (6.4 ± 1.2 mm vs 5.8 ± 0.9 mm; P < .001) and mesenteric (8.9 ± 1.7 mm vs 7.8 ± 1.4 mm; P < .001) target artery diameters. There was no difference in aneurysm diameter (66 ± 13 mm vs 67 ± 11 mm; P = .50), extent I or extent II TAAA classification (64% vs 56%; P = .33), and length of supraceliac coverage (22 ± 9.5 cm vs 20 ± 10 cm; P = .38) between postdissection and degenerative patients, respectively. Preloaded guidewire systems (66% vs 43%; P = .003) and fenestrations as opposed to directional branches (58% vs 24%; P < .001) were used more frequently to treat postdissection patients. Technical success was 100% for postdissection TAAAs and 99% for degenerative TAAAs (P = .14). At 30 days, there was no difference in mortality (2% postdissection, 3% degenerative), major adverse events (24% postdissection, 26% degenerative; P = .73), spinal cord injury (6% postdissection, 12% degenerative; P = .25), paraplegia (2% postdissection, 7% degenerative; P = .19), and dialysis (0% postdissection, 5% degenerative; P = .24). Mean follow-up was 14 ± 12 months. Endoleaks were significantly more frequent in patients with postdissection TAAAs (76%) compared with degenerative TAAAs (43%; P < .001). At 2 years, there was no difference in patient survival (84% ± 7% vs 72% ± 4%; P = .13), freedom from aorta-related death (98% ± 2% vs 94% ± 2%; P = .45), primary (95% ± 2% vs 97% ± 1%; P = .93) and secondary target artery patency (99% ± 1% vs 98% ± 1%; P = .48), target artery instability (89% ± 3% vs 91% ± 1%; P = .17), and freedom from reintervention (58% ± 10% vs 67% ± 5%; P = .23) for postdissection and degenerative TAAAs, respectively., Conclusions: Despite minor differences in demographics, anatomic factors, and stent graft design, F/BEVAR was safe and effective with nearly identical outcomes in patients with postdissection and degenerative TAAAs. Larger clinical experience and longer follow-up are needed to better evaluate differences in mortality, spinal cord injury, target artery instability, and reintervention., (Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate patients who underwent extensive endovascular aortic stent graft coverage (from the aortic arch to abdominal aorta) in terms of early and midterm clinical outcomes., Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was undertaken. All patients were treated with extensive endovascular aortic stent graft coverage with fenestrated and branched endografts at three experienced endovascular centers., Results: Between 2012 and 2017, there were 33 patients (22 male [67%]) treated with a combination of fenestrated-branched stent grafts in the aortic arch and the thoracoabdominal aorta. Most of the patients (20/33 [61%]) had fenestrated-branched endovascular aneurysm repair (fb-EVAR) of the thoracoabdominal aorta as a second-stage procedure after thoracic arch (fb-Arch) repair, 10 had fb-Arch repair as the first procedure, and three patients had a single-stage procedure. The mean age was 67 ± 13 years, and the mean interval between procedures was 13 ± 12 months. For fb-Arch repair, 20 fenestrated and 13 branched devices were used; for fb-EVAR, 23 fenestrated, 5 branched, and 5 composite devices were used. The use of spinal drainage was more common in fb-EVAR (20/33 [61%]). Technical success was 100%. Mean hospital stay was 15 ± 13 days for fb-Arch repair and 12 ± 9 days for fb-EVAR. Two patients died in the hospital after fb-EVAR, resulting in a 30-day mortality of 6% (2/33). No deaths occurred during the fb-Arch repair component or in the single-stage cases. Four patients developed spinal cord injury (12%), 1 had permanent paraplegia (3%), and 2 patients had a neurologic event (1 stroke [3%] and 1 transient ischemic attack [3%]). Six patients (18%) died during a mean follow-up of 23 ± 17 months. The survival at 12 months after the second procedure was 72%, and the freedom from any reintervention was 82%. The 12-month freedom from reintervention was 87% for fb-Arch repair and 81% for fb-EVAR., Conclusions: Extensive endovascular coverage of the aorta for aortic disease seems to be a feasible procedure in experienced centers, with acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality. Spinal cord ischemia appears acceptable despite extensive aortic coverage., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Concomitant thoracoabdominal aneurysm and aortoiliac occlusion are extremely rare and present a unique surgical challenge. We report the successful reconstruction of a 9.2-cm extent III thoracoabdominal aneurysm and aortoiliac occlusion in a 54-year-old male. The surgery was performed using a trifurcated graft and total cardiopulmonary bypass. The combination of cerebrospinal fluid drainage, cold renovisceral perfusion, and reattachment of large segmental arteries resulted in a successful outcome in this rare presentation., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Disclosure: The authors have completed and submitted the Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal Conflict of Interest Statement and none were reported., (© 2020 Houston Methodist Hospital Houston, Texas.)

Presented herein is a clinical case report regarding a repeat intervention for a type II dissecting thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm treated by means of a hybrid technique in a 76-year-old male patient with a single kidney, having 9 years previously endured resection of an aneurysm of the infrarenal aortic portion. The first stage consisted in prosthetic repair of the thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm by an oblique anastomosis, with the second stage (7 days thereafter) being endoprosthetic repair of the descending thoracic aorta. The findings of check-up computed tomography at 16 months postoperatively demonstrated no negative dynamics.

Objective: Early outcomes and late mortality after open repair of extent I to III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) are described, but late graft and aortic events are seldom detailed. This study investigated long-term aortic and graft outcomes as these data are increasingly important as endovascular repair matures., Methods: During 28 years, 516 patients underwent repair (type I, n = 177 [34%]; type II, n = 100 [20%]; type III, n = 239 [46%]). Patients were monitored for late events. Late aortic events were defined as native aortic disease leading to death or further intervention. Planned secondary procedures were excluded. Graft complications included anastomotic aneurysm, graft infection, and branch occlusions. Variables were assessed for association with end points using log-rank methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. Time-to-event analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier methods., Results: In-hospital death occurred in 40 patients (8%), leaving 476 for surveillance. Mean age was 69.8 ± 10.5 years. Mean follow-up was 4.9 ± 4.6 years. Repair conduct included distal aortic perfusion and motor evoked potential monitoring (n = 169 [35.5%]), clamp and sew (n = 307 [64.5%]), and selectively applied in-line mesenteric shunting (n = 172 [36.1%]). At the time of repair, 117 patients (24.6%) had 122 synchronous, noncontiguous aortic aneurysms. There were 98 late aortic and graft events in 89 patients (18.7%); 62 aortic-related events occurred in 56 patients (12%; elective repair, n = 47; emergent repair, n = 14; type A dissection, n = 1) at a mean of 4.4 ± 4.2 years after repair. Variables independently predictive of an aortic event were aortic clamp time (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02/min; P = .001), type III extent (HR, 2.5; P = .008), and expansion of retained aorta (HR, 10.4; P < .0005). There were 33 patients (7%) who experienced 36 graft-related events (anastomotic aneurysm, n = 14 [3% of cohort; aortic, n = 7; visceral patch, n = 6; side graft, n = 1]; graft infection, n = 12; renovisceral occlusion/repair, n = 9 [1.9%; side-arm graft, n = 8; native, n = 1]; and anastomotic stricture, n = 1) occurring at 4.7 ± 4.5 years. Variables predictive of graft-related complication were type II extent (HR, 3.4; P = .002) and distal aortic perfusion and motor evoked potential monitoring (HR, 3.6; P = .02). Freedom from aortic- or graft-related event was 80% at 5 years. Freedom from any aortic or graft reintervention was 84% at 5 years. Aortic-related mortality after discharge was 2.7% and estimated to be 3.1% at 5 years. Overall survival was 67% and 44% at 5 and 10 years, respectively., Conclusions: After type I-III TAAA repair, late aortic and graft-related events occur in 19% of patients. Native aortic disease sequelae are more common than graft complication. Aortic events are predicted by complex operation and degree of remaining aorta. Extensive reconstruction drives graft-related events. Ultimately, reintervention is rare and aorta-related mortality low. These findings verify durability of extensive TAAA repair, serving as benchmarks for endovascular repair., (Copyright © 2018 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study reports the technical aspects and 30-day outcomes of the prospective, multicenter early feasibility study designed to evaluate the GORE EXCLUDER Thoracoabdominal Branch Endoprosthesis (TAMBE; W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz)., Methods: Thirteen patients with pararenal or extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms were prospectively enrolled at five U.S sites and one non-U.S. site from 2014 to 2016. The TAMBE included four portals with either retrograde or antegrade renal portal configuration and used GORE VIABAHN Balloon-Expandable Endoprosthesis (W. L. Gore & Associates) for stenting of the renal and mesenteric arteries. The primary end point was procedural safety at 30 days, defined by absence of major adverse events, including any-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, paraplegia, bowel ischemia, respiratory failure, severe acute kidney injury (>50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate), dialysis, and procedural blood loss >1000 mL., Results: There were 11 male and two female patients with a mean age of 69 ± 8 years. Mean aneurysm diameter was 61 ± 13 mm. A total of 52 renal and mesenteric arteries were incorporated (4 vessels/patient). Technical success was achieved in 12 patients (92%). One patient had inadvertent occlusion of a right renal artery due to dissection. There was no mortality, aneurysm rupture, conversion to open repair, dialysis, or spinal cord injury. Mean length of hospital stay was 5 ± 3 days. At 30 days, four patients (31%) had major adverse events, all due to procedural blood loss >1000 mL. One patient had a type I endoleak at the distal renal branch, which was successfully treated by placement of an additional renal stent before dismissal. Computed tomography angiography at 30 days showed patent target vessels and no type I or type III endoleak., Conclusions: This study confirms the early feasibility of the TAMBE for treatment of pararenal and extent IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. The high technical success, no mortality, and low morbidity rate support continuation of clinical investigation in a larger population of patients., (Copyright © 2018 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)