1. Protocol for a systematic review of guidelines for rigour in the design, conduct and analysis of biomedical experiments involving laboratory animals
- Author
-
Thomas Steckler, Jan Vollert, Esther Schenker, Anton Bespalov, Hanno Wuerbel, Martin Christian Michel, Heidrun Potschka, Kimberley E Wever, Bruce Altevogt, Andrew S C Rice, Judi Clark, Bruno Boulanger, Gernot Riedel, Bettina Platt, Annesha Sil, Martien J Kas, Bernhard Voelkl, Mathias Jucker, Bettina M Wegenast-braun, René Bernard, Esmeralda Heiden, Ann-marie Waldron, Maarten Loos, Tom Van De casteele, Pim Drinkenburg, Juan Diego Pita almenar, David Gallacher, Henk Van Der linde, Anja Gilis, Greet Teuns, Karsten Wicke, Sabine Grote, Bernd Sommer, Janet Nicholson, Sanna Janhunen, Sami Virtanen, Kristin Cheng, Sylvie Ramboz, Emer Leahy, Isabel A Lefevre, Fiona Ducrey, Javier Guillen, Patri Vergara, and Thomas Ingraham
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,protocols & guidelines ,Data management ,Validity ,lcsh:Medicine ,English language ,Rigour ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,EQIPD WP3 study group ,Protocol ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Internal validity ,drug evaluation, preclinical ,Protocol (science) ,Medical education ,630 Agriculture ,business.industry ,lcsh:R ,General Medicine ,BMJOS ,030104 developmental biology ,Systematic review ,Psychology ,business ,Inclusion (education) - Abstract
Objective Within the last years, there has been growing awareness of the negative repercussions of unstandardized planning, conduct and reporting of preclinical and biomedical research. Several initiatives have set the aim of increasing validity and reliability in reporting of studies and publications, and publishers have formed similar groups. Additionally, several groups of experts across the biomedical spectrum have published experience and opinion-based guidelines and guidance on potential standardized reporting. While all these guidelines cover reporting of experiments, an important step prior to this should be rigours planning and conduction of studies. The aim of this systematic review is to identify and harmonize existing experimental design, conduct and analysis guidelines relating to internal validity and reproducibility of preclinical animal research. The review will also identify literature describing risks of bias pertaining to the design, conduct and analysis of preclinical biomedical research. Search strategy PubMed, Embase and Web of Science will be searched systematically to identify guidelines published in English language in peer-reviewed journals before January 2018 (box 1). All articles or systematic reviews in English language that describe or review guidelines on the internal validity and reproducibility of animal studies will be included. Google search for guidelines published on the websites of major funders and professional organisations can be found in (Box 2). Screening and annotation Unique references will be screened in two phases: screening for eligibility based on title and abstract, followed by screening for definitive inclusion based on full text. Screening will be performed in SyRF (http://syrf.org.uk). Each reference will be randomly presented to two independent reviewers. Disagreements between reviewers will be resolved by additional screening of the reference by a third, senior researcher. Data management and reporting All data, including extracted text and guidelines, will be stored in the SyRF platform. Elements of the included guidelines will be identified using a standardized extraction form. Reporting will follow the PRISMA guidelines as far as applicable.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF