Search

UNLABELLED: Intrathecal morphine (ITM) provides effective postoperative cesarean delivery analgesia but has not been reported for postoperative postpartum tubal ligation (PPTL) analgesia. We designed this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study to determine the efficacy of 100 microg ITM for postoperative PPTL analgesia. Sixty-six women received spinal anesthesia with 60 mg (1.2 mL) of 5% hyperbaric lidocaine, 10 microg (0.2 mL) of fentanyl, and either 0.2 mL of 0.9% saline (normal saline; NS) or 100 microg (0.2 mL) of morphine (morphine sulfate, MS). Postoperative analgesia was limited to patient-controlled IV analgesia morphine. Six women (three NS and three MS) were excluded because of major protocol violations. Twenty-four-hour patient-controlled IV analgesia morphine use was (mean +/- SD) 39.6 +/- 19.6 mg in the NS group and 1.1 +/- 2.5 mg in the MS group (P < 0.0000001). Visual analog scale scores for crampy and incisional pain (rest and movement) were significantly higher in the NS group compared with the MS group at 4, 8, 12, and 24 h (P < 0.001). The adverse effect profile was similar between groups. Visual analog scale satisfaction scores (mean +/- SD) were 96.6 +/- 16.0 in the MS group and 84.2 +/- 23.6 in NS group (P < 0.05). The results of this study indicate that women experience significant postoperative pain after PPTL surgery, and this pain is effectively obviated by 100 microg ITM. IMPLICATIONS: This investigation documents the extent of the significant postoperative pain experienced by women after routine postpartum tubal ligation surgery and demonstrates the efficacy of a small dose (100 microg) of intrathecal morphine to obviate this pain with minimal adverse effects.

Dilute concentrations of bupivacaine combined with fentanyl have recently been used to initiate labor epidural analgesia in an attempt to balance adequate analgesia and minimal maternal motor blockade. Similar concentrations of ropivacaine have not been evaluated. This prospective, randomized, doubl

Background The intrathecal combination of sufentanil and bupivacaine provides rapid, effective analgesia for labor with a limited duration. Many anesthesiologists have concerns that the use of intrathecal local anesthetics precludes maternal ambulation. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was designed to determine whether the addition of epinephrine to the combination of sufentanil and bupivacaine would prolong intrathecal analgesia for labor. Patients' ability to ambulate was also assessed. Methods Thirty-nine patients received either an intrathecal control dose of 10 micrograms sufentanil plus 2.5 mg bupivacaine plus 0.2 ml normal saline (control group); or 10 micrograms sufentanil plus 2.5 mg bupivacaine plus 0.2 ml (0.2 mg) of epinephrine (EPI group). Results Seven patients (3 control, 4 EPI) delivered vaginally and two (1 control, 1 EPI) required cesarean delivery before requesting epidural analgesia. The duration (mean +/- SD) of intrathecal labor analgesia was prolonged significantly by the addition of epinephrine: control (n = 15): 145 +/- 23 min; EPI (n = 15): 188 +/- 25 min (P < 0.0001). Maternal ambulation was demonstrated in 100% (19 of 19) of the control group and in 80% (16 of 20) of the EPI group (P = NS). Conclusions The addition of 0.2 mg epinephrine to the intrathecal combination of sufentanil and bupivacaine significantly prolonged labor analgesia without causing adverse effects to the mother or fetus. The intrathecal combination of sufentanil and bupivacaine, with or without epinephrine, provided rapid, profound labor analgesia and allowed most patients to ambulate.

To examine the central nervous system side effects of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) indomethacin in a case-series of obstetric patients. The hospital records of patients experiencing any post-partum complication between 1994 and 1999 were reviewed for adverse drug reactions (ADR) attributed to indomethacin. Additional cases of indomethacin-induced adverse effects were identified through reports to the nursing administration and the Saskatchewan ADR reporting program. The Naranjo ADR probability scale was applied to all cases. Thirty-two patients experienced a psychiatric reaction after receiving indomethacin for postpartum pain. The symptoms were often severe and included dizziness, anxiety, fear, agitation, affective lability, depersonalization, paranoia, and hallucinations. There was no past psychiatric history documented in any of the cases. This study identifies a possible ADR to indomethacin occurring in postpartum patients. Whether the vulnerability to these neuropsychiatric reactions is randomly distributed or if parturients are at increased risk is yet to be determined. Proposed mechanisms of these side effects include a postpartum dopamine supersensitivity exacerbated by prostaglandin inhibition as well as a structural similarity between serotonin and indomethacin. The severity of the reactions to indomethacin in parturients and the potential for these disturbing psychiatric side effects to compromise the safety of both mother and infant have led to the use of alternative analgesics including different classes of NSAIDs for this population at our institution.

This two part study was undertaken to assess both the feasibility of identifying the saphenous nerve with a nerve stimulator and to assess the efficacy of saphenous nerve anaesthesia with electrical isolation of the nerve.(Part I): In Part I we studied 25 volunteers. Each had saphenous nerve blocks performed using a nerve stimulator (NS) and loss of resistance (LOR) technique. We recorded 10 cm linear visual analogue pain scores on completion of the blocks, time to completion of the blocks, onset time, and success of the blocks. (Part II): Clinical utility of the NS technique of saphenous nerve block was investigated. We evaluated the NS technique in 21 consecutive patients having surgery below the knee.(Part I): The LOR technique successfully produced saphenous nerve anaesthesia in 18/25 (72%) volunteers and the NS technique was successful in all volunteers (25/25-P0.05). The nerve stimulator approach required more time to complete (NS 13 +/- 7 min vs LOR 8 +/- 2 min; P0.05). Visual analogue pain scores differed (P0.05) with a median of 1.0 cm for the LOR technique and a median of 2 cm for the NS technique. (Part II): The saphenous nerve block was successful in 20/21 (95%) of the patients.(Part I): The first part of the study established the feasibility of electrical identification of the saphenous nerve and demonstrated that the NS technique could be utilized to provide superior anaesthesia of the saphenous nerve when compared with a previously validated LOR technique. (Part II): The clinical utility of the NS technique of saphenous nerve block was successfully demonstrated.