Search

Harmonization of diagnostic terminology used during the histopathologic analysis of rodent tissue sections from nonclinical toxicity studies will improve the consistency of data sets produced by laboratories located around the world. The INHAND Project ( International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria for Lesions in Rats and Mice) is a cooperative enterprise of 4 major societies of toxicologic pathology to develop a globally accepted standard vocabulary for proliferative and nonproliferative lesions in rodents. A prior manuscript ( Toxicol Pathol 2012;40[4 Suppl]:87S-157S) defined multiple diagnostic terms for toxicant-induced lesions, common spontaneous and age-related changes, and principal confounding artifacts in the rat and mouse central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS). The current article defines 9 new diagnostic terms and updates 2 previous terms for findings in the rodent CNS and PNS, the need for which has become evident in the years since the publication of the initial INHAND nomenclature for findings in rodent neural tissues. The nomenclature presented in this document is also available electronically on the Internet at the goRENI website ( http://www.goreni.org/ ).

The European Society of Toxicologic Pathology organized an expert workshop in May 2018 to address adversity considerations related to thyroid follicular cell hypertrophy and/or hyperplasia (FCHH), which is a common finding in nonclinical toxicity studies that can have important implications for risk assessment of pharmaceuticals, food additives, and environmental chemicals. The broad goal of the workshop was to facilitate better alignment in toxicologic pathology and regulatory sciences on how to determine adversity of FCHH. Key objectives were to describe common mechanisms leading to thyroid FCHH and potential functional consequences; provide working criteria to assess adversity of FCHH in context of associated findings; and describe additional methods and experimental data that may influence adversity determinations. The workshop panel was comprised of representatives from the European Union, Japan, and the United States. Participants shared case examples illustrating issues related to adversity assessments of thyroid changes. Provided here are summary discussions, key case presentations, and panel recommendations. This information should increase consistency in the interpretation of adverse changes in the thyroid based on pathology findings in nonclinical toxicity studies, help integrate new types of biomarker data into the review process, and facilitate a more systematic approach to communicating adversity determinations in toxicology reports.

The potential for developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) of environmental chemicals may be evaluated using specific test guidelines from the US Environmental Protection Agency or the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). These guidelines generate neurobehavioral, neuropathological, and morphometric data that are evaluated by regulatory agencies globally. Data from these DNT guideline studies, or the more recent OECD extended one-generation reproductive toxicity guideline, play a pivotal role in children's health risk assessment in different world areas. Data from the same study may be interpreted differently by regulatory authorities in different countries resulting in inconsistent evaluations that may lead to inconsistencies in risk assessment decisions internationally, resulting in regional differences in public health protection or in commercial trade barriers. These issues of data interpretation and reporting are also relevant to juvenile and pre-postnatal studies conducted more routinely for pharmaceuticals and veterinary medicines. There is a need for development of recommendations geared toward the operational needs of the regulatory scientific reviewers who apply these studies in risk assessments, as well as the scientists who generate DNT data sets. The workshops summarized here draw upon the experience of the authors representing government, industry, contract research organizations, and academia to discuss the scientific issues that have emerged from diverse regulatory evaluations. Although various regulatory bodies have different risk management decisions and labeling requirements that are difficult to harmonize, the workshops provided an opportunity to work toward more harmonized scientific approaches for evaluating DNT data within the context of different regulatory frameworks. Five speakers and their coauthors with neurotoxicology, neuropathology, and regulatory toxicology expertise discussed issues of variability, data reporting and analysis, and expectations in DNT data that are encountered by regulatory authorities. In addition, principles for harmonized evaluation of data were suggested using guideline DNT data as case studies.

The INHAND (International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria for Lesions in Rats and Mice) project is a joint initiative of the societies of toxicological pathology from Europe (ESTP), Great Britain (BSTP), Japan (JSTP) and North America (STP). Its aim is to develop an internationally-accepted nomenclature for proliferative and non-proliferative lesions in laboratory rodents. A widely accepted international harmonization of nomenclature in laboratory animals will decrease confusion among regulatory and scientific research organizations in different countries and will provide a common language to increase and enrich international exchanges of information among toxicologists and pathologists. The purpose of this publication is to provide a standardized nomenclature for classifying microscopical lesions observed in the integument of laboratory rats and mice. Example colour images are provided for most lesions. The standardized nomenclature presented in this document and additional colour images are also available electronically at http://www.goreni.org. The nomenclature presented herein is based on histopathology databases from government, academia, and industrial laboratories throughout the world, and covers lesions that develop spontaneously as well as those induced by exposure to various test materials. (DOI: 10.1293/tox.26.27S; J Toxicol Pathol 2013; 26: 27S-57S).

The identification of adverse health effects has a central role in the development and risk/safety assessment of chemical entities and pharmaceuticals. There is currently a need for better alignment regarding how nonclinical adversity is determined and characterized. The European Society of Toxicologic Pathology (ESTP) therefore coordinated a workshop to review available definitions of adversity, weigh determining and qualifying factors of adversity based on case examples, and recommend a practical approach to define and characterize adversity in toxicology reports, to serve as a valuable prerequisite for future organ- or lesion-specific workshops planned by the ESTP.

Preclinical toxicity studies have demonstrated that exposure of laboratory animals to liver enzyme inducers during preclinical safety assessment results in a signature of toxicological changes characterized by an increase in liver weight, hepatocellular hypertrophy, cell proliferation, and, frequently in long-term (life-time) studies, hepatocarcinogenesis. Recent advances over the last decade have revealed that for many xenobiotics, these changes may be induced through a common mechanism of action involving activation of the nuclear hormone receptors CAR, PXR, or PPARα. The generation of genetically engineered mice that express altered versions of these nuclear hormone receptors, together with other avenues of investigation, have now demonstrated that sensitivity to many of these effects is rodent-specific. These data are consistent with the available epidemiological and empirical human evidence and lend support to the scientific opinion that these changes have little relevance to man. The ESTP therefore convened an international panel of experts to debate the evidence in order to more clearly define for toxicologic pathologists what is considered adverse in the context of hepatocellular hypertrophy. The results of this workshop concluded that hepatomegaly as a consequence of hepatocellular hypertrophy without histologic or clinical pathology alterations indicative of liver toxicity was considered an adaptive and a non-adverse reaction. This conclusion should normally be reached by an integrative weight of evidence approach.

The INHAND Project (International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria for Lesions in Rats and Mice) is a joint initiative of the Societies of Toxicologic Pathology from Europe (ESTP), Great Britain (BSTP), Japan (JSTP) and North America (STP) to develop an internationally-accepted nomenclature for proliferative and non-proliferative lesions in laboratory animals. The purpose of this publication is to provide a standardized nomenclature and differential diagnosis for classifying microscopic lesions observed in the hepatobiliary system of laboratory rats and mice, with color microphotographs illustrating examples of some lesions. The standardized nomenclature presented in this document is also available for society members electronically on the internet (http://goreni.org). Sources of material included histopathology databases from government, academia, and industrial laboratories throughout the world. Content includes spontaneous and aging lesions as well as lesions induced by exposure to test materials. A widely accepted and utilized international harmonization of nomenclature for lesions of the hepatobiliary system in laboratory animals will decrease confusion among regulatory and scientific research organizations in different countries and provide a common language to increase and enrich international exchanges of information among toxicologists and pathologists.

One of the challenges for toxicologic pathologists is to translate the diverse range of morphologic changes that are observed in toxicity studies into a consistent and readily understood set of diagnostic terms to be tabulated and summarized in regulatory reports or peer-reviewed publications. Historically, there have been multiple efforts to provide uniform nomenclature for lesions observed in laboratory animals. These efforts began as early as 1973 and have culminated in various textbooks, workshop reports, and monographs. The efforts have typically focused on the rat and mouse and, in many cases, were limited to proliferative lesions. Many of the texts or documents that describe suggested nomenclature are either not widely available or are out of print. To address this issue, members of the major societies of toxicologic pathology (JSTP, BSTP, ESTP, and STP) have been engaged in an international collaborative effort to codify and publish uniform nomenclature for both proliferative and nonproliferative lesions in laboratory rodents. Several features unique to this effort include (1) a truly international scope, (2) implementation of an open comment period allowing a wide group of toxicologic pathologists the opportunity to provide input, and (3) availability in a Web-based format. The project goes under the acronym INHAND (International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria for Lesions in Rats and Mice). Project oversight is provided by the Global Editorial and Steering Committee (GESC), which consists of members from each of the major societies of toxicologic pathology. The most important components of the INHAND project are the Organ System Working Groups. Formation of these groups is coordinated by the GESC, and they consist of a global chairperson and members from each of the major societies of toxicologic pathology. The GESC actively seeks out organ system experts to serve on these groups. In addition, the GESC often accommodates requests from pathologists who volunteer for a specific organ working group. The Organ System Working Groups have the responsibility to prepare the nomenclature guidelines for both proliferative and nonproliferative lesions of rats and mice for their assigned organ system. In addition to lesions that occur spontaneously, the groups are asked to determine if there are common, xenobiotic-induced lesions for which standardized nomenclature might be needed. The working groups draw heavily from existing nomenclature documents, Web sites, and publications including prior work of the Registry of Industrial Toxicology Animal-Data (RITA) and the Standardized System of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria (SSNDC). For each diagnostic entity, the working group selects a preferred diagnosis and acceptable alternative diagnoses, provides diagnostic criteria and differential diagnosis, and prepares representative photomicrographs. An important feature of the INHAND project is the access provided to the global open Registry Nomenclature Information System (goRENI; www.goreni.org) (Figure 1). Access is provided to all members of toxicologic pathology societies worldwide. Access is free but must be requested through the goRENI Web site (Figure 2). Once access is granted, pathologists can navigate by organ systems (Figure 3) and ultimately select a diagnosis they would like to view. Within the goRENI system, each diagnostic entity is referred to as a ‘‘manuscript.’’ An example is the written information, and photographic illustrations, provided for a bronchiolo-alveolar carcinoma as shown in Figure 4. Once an organ working group has prepared a draft document, the nomenclature is placed on the goRENI Web site for review and discussion. Members of the contributing STPs are notified of the dates of the review period through their respective societies. Following the designated comment period, the working group revises the nomenclature documents and, in consultation with the GESC, finalizes the nomenclature for that organ system. Finalized nomenclature will be available to toxicologic pathologists in two forms: (1) electronic access via the goRENI Web site and (2) print-based publication in the toxicologic pathology journals. Due to the substantial costs associated with print-based This is an opinion article submitted to the Regulatory Forum and does not constitute an official position of the Society of Toxicologic Pathology or the journal Toxicologic Pathology. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the policies, positions, or opinions of their respective agencies and organizations. Conflict of interest: The authors have not declared any conflict of interest.

The revision of the OECD TG 407 test guideline (repeated dose 28-day oral toxicity study in rodents) focuses on endpoints to detect endocrine activities of chemicals. The new endpoints are likely to influence other previously established core endpoints of this study type. An expert group of pathologists and toxicologists within the European Society of Toxicologic Pathologists (ESTP) has contributed to the scientific discussion of the draft guideline. The advantages and disadvantages of methodical changes as necropsy of all females in dioestrus, blood collection for clinical chemistry and haematology at the same cycle stage, weighing of the thyroid gland and separate weighing of ventral and dorsolateral lobes of the prostate are considered. Possible alternatives are pointed out covering scientific as well as practical aspects.

The INHAND Proposal (International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria for Lesions in Rats and Mice) has been operational since 2005. A Global Editorial Steering Committee (GESC) manages the overall objectives of the project and the development of harmonized terminology for each organ system is the responsibility of the Organ Working Groups (OWG), drawing upon experts from North America, Europe and Japan.Great progress has been made with 9 systems published to date – Respiratory, Hepatobiliary, Urinary, Central/Peripheral Nervous Systems, Male Reproductive and Mammary, Zymbals, Clitoral and Preputial Glands in Toxicologic Pathology and the Integument and Soft Tissue and Female Reproductive System in the Journal of Toxicologic Pathology as supplements and on a web site – www.goreni.org. INHAND nomenclature guides offer diagnostic criteria and guidelines for recording lesions observed in rodent toxicity and carcinogenicity studies. The guides provide representative photo-micrographs of morphologic changes, information regarding pathogenesis, and key references. During 2012, INHAND GESC representatives attended meetings with representatives of the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC), and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Enterprise Vocabulary Services (EVS) to begin incorporation of INHAND terminology as preferred terminology for SEND (Standard for Exchange of Nonclinical Data) submissions to the FDA. The interest in utilizing the INHAND nomenclature, based on input from industry and government toxicologists as well as information technology specialists, suggests that there will be wide acceptance of this nomenclature. The purpose of this publication is to provide an update on the progress of INHAND.

A half-day Society of Toxicologic Pathology continuing education course on “Fundamentals of Translational Neuroscience in Toxicologic Pathology” presented some current major issues faced when extrapolating animal data regarding potential neurological consequences to assess potential human outcomes. Two talks reviewed functional–structural correlates in rodent and nonrodent mammalian brains needed to predict behavioral consequences of morphologic changes in discrete neural cell populations. The third lecture described practical steps for ensuring that specimens from rodent developmental neurotoxicity tests will be processed correctly to produce highly homologous sections. The fourth talk detailed demographic factors (e.g., species, strain, sex, and age); physiological traits (body composition, brain circulation, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic patterns, etc.); and husbandry influences (e.g., group housing) known to alter the effects of neuroactive agents. The last presentation discussed the appearance, unknown functional effects, and potential relevance to humans of polyethylene glycol (PEG)–associated vacuoles within the choroid plexus epithelium of animals. Speakers provided real-world examples of challenges with data extrapolation among species or with study design considerations that may impact the interpretability of results. Translational neuroscience will be bolstered in the future as less invasive and/or more quantitative techniques are devised for linking overt functional deficits to subtle anatomic and chemical lesions.

RITA (Registry of Industrial Toxicology Animal-data) is a pathology data base for the collection of validated histopathological data on tumours and potentially pre-neoplastic lesions observed in laboratory rodents. To enable a better comparison of information, standardized techniques for the preparation of histological slides have been established for all organs. The current paper describes the guidelines for organ sampling and trimming procedures applied in the RITA project, i.e. the number of sections to be taken, the direction in which an organ should be cut, the localization (anatomical site) from which a sample should be taken, and the size of an organ (or part of an organ) to be placed in cassettes for processing. Schematical illustrations and additional explanations are provided to support the proposed standardized procedures in histology laboratories.

Harmonization of diagnostic nomenclature used in the pathology analysis of tissues from rodent toxicity studies will enhance the comparability and consistency of data sets from different laboratories worldwide. The INHAND Project ( International Harmonization of Nomenclature and Diagnostic Criteria for Lesions in Rats and Mice) is a joint initiative of four major societies of toxicologic pathology to develop a globally recognized nomenclature for proliferative and nonproliferative lesions in rodents. This article recommends standardized terms for classifying changes observed in tissues of the mouse and rat central (CNS) and peripheral (PNS) nervous systems. Sources of material include academic, government, and industrial histopathology databases from around the world. Covered lesions include frequent, spontaneous, and aging-related changes as well as principal toxicant-induced findings. Common artifacts that might be confused with genuine lesions are also illustrated. The neural nomenclature presented in this document is also available electronically on the Internet at the goRENI website ( http://www.goreni.org/ ).

The continuing education course on Developmental Neurotoxicity Testing (DNT) was designed to communicate current practices for DNT neuropathology, describe promising innovations in quantitative analysis and noninvasive imaging, and facilitate a discussion among experienced neuropathologists and regulatory scientists regarding suitable DNT practices. Conventional DNT neuropathology endpoints are qualitative histopathology and morphometric endpoints of particularly vulnerable sites (e.g., cerebral, cerebellar, or hippocampal thickness). Novel imaging and stereology measurements hold promise for automated analysis of factors that cannot be effectively examined in routinely processed specimens (e.g., cell numbers, fiber tract integrity). The panel recommended that dedicated DNT neuropathology data sets be acquired on a minimum of 8 sections (for qualitative assessment) or 3 sections (for quantitative linear and stereological analyses) using a small battery of stains to examine neurons and myelin. Where guidelines permit discretion, immersion fixation is acceptable for younger animals (postnatal day 22 or earlier), and peripheral nerves may be embedded in paraffin. Frequent concerns regarding DNT data sets include false-negative outcomes due to processing difficulties (e.g., lack of concordance among sections from different animals) and insensitive analytical endpoints (e.g., qualitative evaluation) as well as false-positive results arising from overinterpretation or misreading by inexperienced pathologists.

Specific regions in the rat larynx exhibit cellular changes in response to inhaled xenobiotics. These regions include the base of the epiglottis, ventral pouch, and medial surfaces of the vocal processes of the arytenoid cartilages. 1 , 2 In order to collect information on the usefulness of trimming techniques, the influence of different vehicles, the impact of different application routes in toxicity studies, and differences between induced vs. spontaneous lesions, the data obtained from a large number of inhalation and non-inhalation studies performed in Wistar RCCHan(TM): Wist rats at Harlan Laboratories Ltd Switzerland, all evaluated or reviewed by the same pathologist, were compiled for a detailed review. The value of different trimming techniques was deemed to be greatest for transverse and sagittolongitudinal section techniques, as compared to horizontolongitudinally section techniques. The comparison of lesions encountered in control rats of inhalation studies treated with different vehicles did not reveal differences in the type, distribution pattern, incidence and/or severity of spontaneous lesions. The types of lesions were also independent of different application routes in non-inhalation studies compared to inhalation studies. The pattern of spontaneous lesions in the rodent larynx was determined by degenerative and inflammatory lesions starting most often in the submucosal glands by desiccated secretion followed by mineralization and local inflammation or were induced by impacted foreign bodies. Squamous metaplasia was recorded in the respiratory epithelium overlaying the ventral gland as a spontaneous lesion in male Wistar rats from inhalation studies with a maxim of 20.0% in an inhalation oncogenicity study. Induced metaplastic changes recorded in the larynx were reversible. Other induced lesions in inhalation studies consisted of submucosal edema, necrosis, inflammation and/or granuloma. Induced lesions in non-inhalation studies were found to be exclusively related to reflux laryngitis or food impaction. It is concluded, that in rodents induced lesions of the larynx differ in type, distribution pattern, severity and incidence from spontaneous lesions.

Invited international experts participated in a 2-day workshop organized by the European Society of Toxicologic Pathology (ESTP) to evaluate and discuss spontaneous and induced laryngeal lesions in rodents. The main purpose of the workshop was to agree upon the terminology and relevance of a range of laryngeal changes that varied from very subtle epithelial alterations up to severe metaplastic or neoplastic lesions. The workshop experts concluded that minimal, focal epithelial changes of the laryngeal epithelium, predominantly occurring at the base of the epiglottis, should be given the descriptive term of "epithelial alteration" and assessed as "non-adverse". Although observed as induced effects they may also occur in non-treated animals and were not considered to have a potential for a laryngeal dysfunction. Also, cases of minimal to slight laryngeal squamous metaplasia that are not observed diffusely could occur spontaneously or as treatment-induced lesions and should be assessed as "non-adverse". Cases of moderate to severe laryngeal squamous metaplasia observed diffusely in multiple levels should be regarded as "adverse", as there is a potential for dysfunction of the larynx. The occurrence of dysplasia or cellular atypia linked to laryngeal squamous metaplasia should always be reported separately and described in detail. In the evaluation of treatment-related effects of the larynx in studies utilizing aged animals, it has to be considered that moderate or even severe cases of focal laryngeal squamous metaplasia may occasionally be found as age-related, spontaneous lesions. Although inhalation exposure of rodents to non-genotoxic compounds may cause laryngeal squamous metaplasia, none of the workshop experts were aware of any reported cases of tumor induction in the larynx with a non-genotoxic compound. Therefore, for non-genotoxic compounds, the workshop experts did not regard laryngeal squamous metaplasia by itself as a precancerous lesion.