Search

In the midst of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, governmental agencies, state medical boards, and healthcare organizations have called for restricting “elective” operations to mitigate the risk of transmission of the virus amongst patients and healthcare providers and to preserve essential resources for potential regional surges of COVID patients. While the fear of delaying surgical care for many of our patients is deeply challenging for us as cancer care providers, we must balance our personal commitment to providing timely and appropriate oncologic care to our cancer patients with our societal responsibility to protect our patients (including those on whom we are operating), co-workers, trainees, families, and community, from undue risks of contracting and propagating COVID-19. Herein, we present guidelines for surgical decision-making and case prioritization developed among all adult disease specialties in the MD Anderson Cancer Center Departments of Surgical Oncology and Breast Surgical Oncology in Houston, Texas.

Background Appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) is an orphan disease with unique clinical attributes but often treated as colorectal cancer (CRC). Understanding key molecular differences between AA and CRC is critical. Methods We performed retrospective analyses of AA patients (N = 266) with tumour and/or blood next-generation sequencing (NGS) (2013–2018) with in-depth clinicopathological annotation. Overall survival (OS) was examined. For comparison, CRC cohorts annotated for sidedness, consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) and mutations (N = 3283) were used. Results Blood-NGS identified less RAS/GNAS mutations compared to tissue-NGS (4.2% vs. 60.9%, P RAS (56.2%), GNAS (28.1%) and TP53 (26.9%) were most frequent mutations. Well/moderately differentiated tumours harboured more RAS (69.2%/64.0% vs. 40.5%) and GNAS (48.7%/32.0% vs. 10.1%) while moderate/poorly differentiated tumours had more TP53 (26.0%/27.8% vs. 7.7%) mutations. Appendiceal adenocarcinoma (compared to CRC) harboured significantly fewer APC (9.1% vs. 55.4%) and TP53 (26.9% vs. 67.5%) and more GNAS mutations (28.1% vs. 2.0%) (P Conclusion Integrated clinico-molecular profiling of AA identified key molecular drivers distinct from CRC. Appendiceal adenocarcinoma has a predominantly grade-driven biology that trumps mutations.

BACKGROUND. Resection of recurrent retroperitoneal well-differentiated liposarcoma (RP-WDLPS) is unlikely to result in cure. Thus, most clinicians delay surgery after recurrence until symptom intolerance or increasing rate of disease progression. The aim of this study was to determine whether longer surveillance intervals in this population would impact outcomes or delay treatment in those who recur. METHODS. A retrospective review of patients with primary RP-WDLPS who underwent resection between April 1996 and April 2017 and surveillance at MDACC (n = 91) was performed. RESULTS. Median age at diagnosis of primary RP-WDLPS was 61 years; median tumor size was 30 cm. Complete resection was achieved in 85 (93.4%) patients. Among patients who underwent complete resection, recurrence occurred in 53 (60.2%) with median time to recurrence of 27.0 months. Thirty-six (69.6%) of these patients underwent resection of recurrent disease at a median 40.2 months from primary tumor resection. Surveillance imaging at 4-month (vs 3-month) intervals would not have impacted recurrence management in 84 (95.5%) patients; imaging at 6-month (vs 3-month) intervals would not have impacted management of recurrence in 80 (90.9%). CONCLUSIONS. Recurrence was common, often occurring beyond the early postoperative period following primary RP-WDLPS resection. More frequent surveillance imaging (q3–4 vs q6 months) in the first 2 years following primary RP-WDLPS resection may not significantly impact timing of surgery or systemic therapy for recurrence. If longer surveillance intervals were shown to be safe with equivalent outcomes in prospective studies, the resulting change in practice could lead to decreased anxiety and cost for patients and healthcare systems.

IMPORTANCE: Studies on the prognostic role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) are currently not available. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate outcomes after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC compared with CRS alone in patients with PMP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study analyzed data from the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) registry, including 1924 patients with histologically confirmed PMP due to an appendiceal mucinous neoplasm. Eligible patients were treated with CRS with or without HIPEC from February 1, 1993, to December 31, 2017, and had complete information on the main prognostic factors and intraperitoneal treatments. Inverse probability treatment weights based on the propensity score for HIPEC treatment containing the main prognostic factors were applied to all models to balance comparisons between the CRS-HIPEC vs CRS-alone groups in the entire series and in the following subsets: optimal cytoreduction, suboptimal cytoreduction, high- and low-grade histologic findings, and different HIPEC drug regimens. Data were analyzed from March 1 to June 1, 2018. INTERVENTIONS: HIPEC including oxaliplatin plus combined fluorouracil-leucovorin, cisplatin plus mitomycin, mitomycin, and other oxaliplatin-based regimens. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Overall survival, severe morbidity (determined using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology for Adverse Events, version 3.0), return to operating room, and 30- and 90-day mortality. Differences in overall survival were compared using weighted Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards multivariable models. A sensitivity analysis was based on the E-value from the results of the main Cox proportional hazards model. Differences in surgical outcomes were compared using weighted multivariable logistic models. RESULTS: Of the 1924 patients included in the analysis (997 [51.8%] men; median age, 56 [interquartile range extremes (IQRE), 45-65] years), 376 were in the CRS-alone group and 1548 in the CRS-HIPEC group. Patients with CRS alone were older (median age, 60 [IQRE, 48-70] vs 54 [IQRE, 44-63] years), had less lymph node involvement (14 [3.7%] vs 119 [7.7%]), received more preoperative systemic chemotherapy (198 [52.7%] vs 529 [34.2%]), and had higher proportions of high-grade disease (179 [47.6%] vs 492 [31.8%]) and suboptimal cytoreduction residual disease (grade 3, 175 [46.5%] vs 117 [7.6%]). HIPEC was not associated with a higher risk of worse surgical outcomes except with mitomycin, with higher odds of morbidity (1.99; 95% CI, 1.25-3.19; P = .004). HIPEC was associated with a significantly better overall survival in all subsets (adjusted hazard ratios [HRs], 0.60-0.68, with 95% CIs not crossing 1.00). The weighted 5-year overall survival was 57.8% (95% CI, 50.8%-65.7%) vs 46.2% (95% CI, 40.3%-52.8%) for CRS-HIPEC and CRS alone, respectively (weighted HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50-0.83; P

Palliative medicine is an important component of care for patients with advanced cancer. Previous studies demonstrated that surgeons tend to underuse palliative care in comparison with medical services. In addition, little is known about the specific use of palliative care services among surgical oncology practices. Therefore, we designed and performed this study to evaluate the use of palliative care in medical and surgical oncology patients.A single-institution retrospective review of consecutive palliative care consultations within a large National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center in 2016 to 2017 was conducted.We analyzed 120 patients (60 surgical and 60 medical). Patient demographics in the 2 groups were similar. The surgical oncology patients were more likely to undergo consultation for advanced care planning (32% vs 13%; p = 0.02). Medical oncology patients were more likely to undergo consultation for pain management (97% vs 62%; p0.001). Symptom assessment scores for medical patients more frequently demonstrated dyspnea and malignancy-related pain than in surgical patients. Also, palliative care recommendations and interventions for surgical patients more frequently included end-of-life discussions and transfer to the inpatient palliative care unit. For medical oncology patients, recommendations more often included changes in pain and bowel regimen medication. In addition, despite more frequent consults for advanced care planning in the surgical patients, code status was changed to DNR more frequently in the medical patient cohort.Surgical patients were less likely to undergo palliative care consultation for assistance with symptom management and more likely to undergo consultation for assistance with end-of-life discussions than were medical oncology patients. Advanced care planning and end-of-life discussions should be an area of focus in palliative care education for surgeons.

This chapter identifies barriers to patient-centered care in those nearing the end of life, explores best practices for addressing surgical expectations in high-risk patients and integrating palliative care into the interdisciplinary perioperative team, and discusses potential adverse effects of current surgical quality metrics and their effect on the surgeon. We propose an enhanced model for palliative care involvement in surgical care for patients at the end of life which includes support for the patient and surgeon to maintain a patient-centered approach and lessen the emotional toll of unexpected outcomes.

8557 Background: MPeM is a rare and aggressive cancer with very limited treatment options. Lack of dedicated research has impeded improvements in outcomes. Defining prevalent GAs is a critical unmet need for use of targeted therapies in these patients. Although MPeM is notably distinct from MPM vis-à-vis epidemiologic and clinical attributes, the genomic underpinings of these differences have yet to be established. We aimed at describing a comprehensive genomic profile (CGP) of MPeM in comparison to MPM. Methods: We performed a retrospective comparative analysis between 89 patients with MPeM and 241 patients with MPM (N = 330) who underwent CGP using CLIA certified next-generation sequencing assays. The cohort was generated using mesothelioma patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center (N = 223) and supplemented by additional mesothelioma patients (N = 107) from a publicly available database from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, the MSK-IMPACT database. Essential clinicopathological variables were collected. Descriptive statistics, Fisher’s exact and Mann-Whitney tests were used for comparison. Kaplan-meier method and log rank tests were used for overall survival (OS) estimates. Results: MPeM cohort (vs. MPM) had more women (54% vs. 31%, P < 0.001) and younger age at diagnosis (56 vs. 69 years, P < 0.001). Histology was epithelioid, biphasic and sarcomatoid in 86%, 7% and 7% cases, a distribution similar to MPM cohort. At least 1 GA was found in 64 (72% vs. 82% in MPM, P = 0.044) of MPeM patients with a median of 1 (range 1 – 12) (vs. a median of 2, range 1 – 24, P < 0.001) GA per patient. A significantly lower proportion of MPeM patients had ≥ 3 mutations (14% vs. 26%, OR 2.1, P = 0.028) per patient. The most frequent mutations were present in the following genes: TP53 (24%), BAP1 (16%), NF2 (15%), MET (9%) and TRAF7, KIT and PIK3CA (each 6%). MPeM patients harbored more mutations in MET (9% vs. < 1%, P < 0.001) and TRAF7 (6% vs. < 1%, P = 0.02) but fewer mutations in BAP1 (16% vs. 32%, P = 0.003) and CDKN2B (0% vs. 5%, P = 0.041). The most common copy number variations (CNVs: amplifications or deletions) were seen in BAP1, MCL1, SETD2, WT1 (each 2%) and AURKA (1%) genes. Among genes with CNVs, MPeM had a lower rate of deletions in CDKN2A (1% vs. 6%, P = 0.040). Among more common GAs, only BAP1 mutations appeared to be associated with poor OS (45.7 vs. 127.1 months, HR 2.5, 95%CI: 0.6 – 10.1, P = 0.050) in patients with MPeM. Conclusions: In this large cohort with CGP, we identified potential molecular drivers in MPeM and demonstrated key genomic differences between MPeM and MPM. MPeM is frequently driven by GAs involved in cell cycle control, a potentially targetable pathway. Despite this insight from CGP, a large subset of patients do not have actionable GAs and for these patients, further collaborative trans-“omic” research efforts are needed to advance potential therapeutic options.

The purpose of this study was to identify behaviors that faculty and residents exhibit during intraoperative interactions, which support or inhibit progressive entrustment leading to operative autonomy.In the operating room, a critical balance is sought between direct faculty supervision and appropriate increase in resident autonomy with indirect faculty supervision. Little is known regarding perspectives of faculty and residents about how attendings increasingly step back and safely delegate autonomy to trainees. Understanding the context in which these decisions are made is critical to achieving a safe strategy for imparting progressive responsibility.A qualitative study was undertaken from January 2014 to February 2015. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 37 faculty and 59 residents from 14 and 41 institutions, respectively. Participants were selected using stratified random sampling from general surgery residency programs across the United States to represent a range of university, university-affiliated, and community programs, and geographic regions. Audio recordings of interviews were transcribed, iteratively analyzed, and emergent themes identified.Six themes were identified as influencing progressive entrustment in the operating room: optimizing faculty intraoperative feedback; policies and regulations affecting role of resident in the operating room; flexible faculty teaching strategies; context-specific variables; leadership opportunities for resident in the case; and safe struggle for resident when appropriate.Perspectives of faculty and residents while overlapping were different in emphasis. Better understanding faculty-resident interactions, individual behaviors, contextual influences, and national regulations that influence intraoperative education have the potential to significantly affect progressive entrustment in training paradigms.

To evaluate the relationship between hospital teaching intensity, Medicare payments, and perioperative outcomes.Several emerging payment policies penalize hospitals for low-value healthcare. Teaching hospitals may be at a disadvantage given the perception that they deliver care less efficiently.Using Medicare Provider and Analysis Review files, we studied patients from age 65 to 100 years who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (n = 71,422), pulmonary resection (n = 93,056), or colectomy (n = 277,619) from 2009 to 2012. Patients' hospitals were categorized into quintiles of teaching intensity (very major, major, minor, very minor, and nonteaching hospitals) based on the resident-to-bed ratio. Risk-adjusted 30-day Medicare payments were price-standardized to account for graduate medical education payments, disproportionate share costs, and regional wage-index adjustments. Risk-adjusted perioperative outcomes were also assessed.Comparing risk-adjusted Medicare payments per episode of surgery, very major teaching hospitals were $14,145 more expensive than nonteaching hospitals for AAA repair ($45,570 vs $31,426; P0.001), $9,812 more expensive for pulmonary resection ($39,550 vs $29,738; P0.001), and $19,147 more expensive for colectomy ($51,893 vs $32,746; P0.001). However, after accounting for social subsidies and regional variation in Medicare spending, risk-adjusted Medicare payments were not statistically different between very major teaching hospitals and nonteaching hospitals for AAA repair ($29,946 vs $27,993; P = 0.18) and pulmonary resection ($25,407 vs $26,813; P = 1.00); a statistically significant but attenuated difference persisted for colectomy ($34,949 vs $30,352; P0.001). Very major teaching hospitals generally had higher risk-adjusted rates of serious complications and readmissions, but lower risk-adjusted rates of failure to rescue and 30-day mortality than did nonteaching hospitals.After price-standardization to account for intended differences in Medicare spending, risk-adjusted Medicare payments for an episode of surgical care were similar at teaching hospitals and nonteaching hospitals for three complex inpatient operations.

Complex general surgical oncology (CGSO) fellowships recently obtained Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accreditation and board certification eligibility. We aimed to characterize the applicant pool and identify factors predictive of matching into our program. We conducted a retrospective review of CGSO fellowship applications to a major cancer center from 2008 to 2018. Data were analyzed for trends over time, including a comparison of pre- versus post-American Board of Surgery (ABS) certification eligibility. A total of 846 applications were reviewed. Most applicants (86.2%) trained in a US residency program; 58.4% performed ≥ 1 research year during residency; 29.6% had a dual degree. Fewer applicants (34.5%) were female, a trend which did not change over time. Post-ABS, applicants were more likely to complete ≥ 1 year between residency and fellowship (20.9% versus 13.2%, p = 0.003), to be in practice at the time of application (12.2% versus 6.6%, p = 0.005), and to reapply (5.5% versus 1.0%, p

This review outlines the current state of undergraduate medical education for the surgeon in training, and highlights ongoing efforts to improve the preparation of graduating students entering surgical residency. Possible models for improved integration of specialty specific training in medical school are explored, and future directions in undergraduate surgical education are considered in the context of ongoing curricular initiatives in medical schools within North America.

Background Pancreatic surgery outcomes vary widely. We hypothesize that by comparing high and low mortality hospitals, we may identify differences in patient care impacting safety. Methods We sampled hospitals with very-low and very-high mortality (LMH; HMH) and conducted on-site chart reviews evaluating perioperative care practices for pancreatic operations. Results HMHs had an 11.6% mortality rate; LMHs 1.5%. Patients in HMHs had worse ASA classification (20.9% ASA Class 4/5 vs. 2.0%, P

In 2006, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a national coverage decision restricting bariatric surgery to designated centers of excellence (COE). Although prior studies show mixed results on complications and reoperations, no prior studies evaluated whether this policy reduced spending for bariatric surgery. We sought to determine whether the coverage restriction to COE-designated hospitals was associated with lower payments from CMS. We utilized national Medicare claims data to examine 30-day episode payments for patients who underwent bariatric surgery from 2003 to 2010 (n = 72,117 patients). We performed an interrupted time series analysis, adjusting for patient factors, preexisting temporal trends, and changes in procedure type, to determine whether the 2006 coverage decision was associated with lower Medicare payments above and beyond any existing secular trends. For these analyses, we included payments for the index hospitalization, readmissions, physician services, and post-discharge ancillary care. After accounting for patient factors, preexisting temporal trends, and changes in procedure type, there were no statistically significant improvements in episode payments after (US$14,720) vs before (US$14,283) the coverage decision (+US$437, 95 % CI, −US$10 to +US$883). In a direct assessment of payments for COE-designated hospitals (US$14,481) vs non-COE-designated hospitals (US$14,756), no significant differences in episode payments were found (−US$275, 95 % CI, −US$696 to +US$145). We found no significant reductions in 30-day episode payments after vs before restricting coverage to COE-designated hospitals. Center of excellence status is not a proxy for savings to the healthcare system.

Objective The development of operative skills during general surgery residency depends largely on the resident surgeons' (residents) ability to accurately self-assess and identify areas for improvement. We compared evaluations of laparoscopic skills and comfort level of residents from both the residents' and attending surgeons' (attendings') perspectives. Design We prospectively observed 111 elective cholecystectomies at the University of Michigan as part of a larger quality improvement initiative. Immediately after the operation, both residents and attendings completed a survey in which they rated the residents' operative proficiency, comfort level, and the difficulty of the case using a previously validated instrument. Residents' and attendings' evaluations of residents' performance were compared using 2-sided t tests. Setting The University of Michigan Health System in Ann Arbor, MI. Large academic, tertiary care institution. Participants All general surgery residents and faculty at the University of Michigan performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy between June 1 and August 31, 2013. Data were collected for 28 of the institution's 54 trainees. Results Attendings rated residents higher than what residents rated themselves on a 5-point Likert-type scale regarding depth perception (3.86 vs. 3.38, p Conclusions A gap exists between residents' and attendings' perception of residents' laparoscopic skills and comfort level in performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. These findings call for improved communication between residents and attendings to ensure that graduates are adequately prepared to operate independently. In the context of changing methods of resident evaluations that call for explicitly defined competencies in surgery, it is essential that residents are able to accurately self-assess and be in general agreement with attendings on their level of laparoscopic skills and comfort level while performing a case.

9013 Background: Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPeM) is an orphan malignancy. No recommended/FDA approved therapies exist for salvage treatment beyond first-line platinum and pemetrexed based chemotherapy. While immune checkpoint inhibition has shown preliminary efficacy in mesotheliomas, data and efficacy is limited in MPeM patients (pts) [objective response rate (ORR) ~ 11%; median progression-free survival (mPFS) ~ 4 months (m); median overall survival (mOS) ~ 11 m]. We aimed to prospectively assess the safety and efficacy of combined anti-PD1 (atezolizumab) and VEGF (bevacizumab) blockade (AtezoBev) in pts with MPeM. Methods: In this phase 2 study, eligible pts with histologically confirmed MPeM, ECOG PS 0-1, and prior platinum and pemetrexed treatment were treated with 1200 mg of atezolizumab and 15 mg/kg of bevacizumab IV every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Primary endpoint was confirmed ORR by RECIST 1.1 by independent radiology review. Duration of response (DOR), PFS and OS were pre-specified secondary endpoints. Results: Among 20 enrolled pts (3/2017 - 2/2019), median age was 63 (range, 33-87) years, 12 (60%) were female, 12 (60%) had PS 0, and 2 (10%) had biphasic MPeM. Among 20 evaluable pts (median cycles 14), confirmed ORR was 35% (7 pts; 95% CI: 15.4-59.2) (median DOR 8.8 m). Responses were ongoing in 5/7 (71.4%) pts at data cutoff. The median follow-up was 20.5 months. Six deaths were observed during follow-up, and the 1-year OS was 79% (95% CI: 52 – 91) (median OS ~ NR). Median PFS was estimated as 17.6 m (95% CI: 9.1 – NR). The 1-year PFS was 54% (95% CI: 28 – 74). Grade 3 (no grade 4/5) treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 10 (50%) pts; most common being hypertension (40%) and anemia (10%). Two (10%) pts had grade 3 immune-related adverse events. Translational studies are ongoing. Conclusions: AtezoBev showed promising and durable efficacy in relapsed/refractory MPeM with acceptable safety profile. Ongoing multiomic analyses of pre and on-treatment tissue/liquid biopsies obtained on all these pts will provide additional insight into mechanisms and biomarkers of response and resistance. Clinical trial information: NCT03074513.

To determine the temporal relationship between reducing surgical complications and costs, using the study population of bariatric surgery.Understanding the relationship between quality and costs has significant implications for the business case of investing in performance improvement. An unprecedented focus on safety in bariatric surgery has led to substantial reductions in complication rates over time, making it an ideal patient population in which to examine this relationship.We performed a retrospective review of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgery in the years 2005 to 2006 and 2013 to 2014 (total N = 37,329 patients, 562 hospitals). Hospitals were ranked into quintiles based on their degree of improvement in risk and reliability-adjusted 30-day rates of serious complications across the time periods. Multivariable regression was used to calculate corresponding changes in average price-standardized payments for each quintile of hospitals.We found a strong association between reductions in complications and decreased Medicare payments. The top 20% of hospitals had a decrease in average serious complication rate of 7.3% (10.0%-2.7%; P0.001) and an average per-patient savings of $4861 (95% confidence interval $3921-5802). Conversely, the bottom 20% of hospitals had smaller decrease in complication rate of 0.8% (4.4% to 3.6%; P0.001) and a smaller average savings of $2814 (95% confidence interval $2139-3490).When analyzing Medicare patients undergoing bariatric surgery, hospitals with the largest reductions in serious postoperative complications had the greatest decrease in per-patient payments. This study demonstrates the potential savings associated with quality improvement in high-risk surgical procedures.

The reported influence of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident duty hour limitations on operative case volume has been mixed. Additional restrictions instituted in July 2011 further limited the work hours of postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) residents, threatening to reduce availability for educational and operative activities. In this study, we evaluate our novel intern call schedule, which we hypothesized would preserve operative experience despite these increased restrictions.A retrospective analysis of PGY-1 operative reports was conducted. Operations outside of major case categories were excluded. Operative case volumes in the Section of General Surgery for the same period were analyzed, as were average duty hours for each resident. Comparative statistics were generated using Wilcoxon rank sum tests.Single-institution study conducted at the University of Michigan, a tertiary-care academic hospital.Overall, 50 categorical general surgery residents from 2005 to present were included. Three residents were subsequently excluded as they were preliminary interns rather than categorical; 2 residents were excluded having completed their intern years at other institutions.The median number of major cases done during the PGY-1 for all evaluated residents was 89 (interquartile range [IQR]: 72-101). For interns between the years 2005 and 2011, the median number of major cases was 87 (IQR: 73-101), whereas interns in the 2011 to 2013 academic years performed 91.5 (IQR: 69.5-101.5, p = 0.91). Although case volume varied between intern classes, no significant differences were observed between any 2 individual classes in the study. Analysis of annual case volumes among each PGY revealed a relative increase of 29% (p0.001) among PGY-2 residents, and 20% (p = 0.02) by PGY-3 residents. Relative increases among senior residents (8% for both PGY-4 and PGY-5) did not reach statistical significance.Our novel call schedule attempts to minimize prolonged night-float coverage responsibilities for interns in hopes of preserving their operative experience. In spite of increased duty hour restrictions, PGY-1 operative volume has not decreased significantly at our institution. However, in the same time period, PGY-2 and PGY-3 case volume has increased. Our findings highlight the challenges faced by surgical residencies in light of these new restrictions, particularly the 16-hour limit. Additional rigorously designed prospective studies should be conducted to better understand the influence of the most recent Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education work hour limitations on the subjective and objective experiences of surgical residents.

This contemporary review of melanoma surveillance strategies seeks to help practitioners examine and improve their surveillance protocols based on the currently available data. In general, there is no definitive benefit from increased screening or more aggressive use of interval imaging. Low-intensity surveillance strategies do not appear to adversely affect patient outcomes and should be the preferred approach compared with high-intensity strategies for most melanoma patients. All surveillance programs should emphasize education in order to maximize the effectiveness of patient-based detection of recurrent disease.

Importance Measures of surgeons’ skills have been associated with variations in short-term outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass. However, the effect of surgical skill on long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery is unknown. Objective To study the association between surgical skill and long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants In this retrospective observational study, 20 surgeons performing bariatric surgery submitted videos; surgeons were ranked on their skill level through blinded peer video review and sorted into quartiles of skill. Outcomes of bariatric surgery were then examined at the patient level across skill levels. The patients (N = 3631) undergoing surgery with these surgeons had 1-year postoperative follow-up data available between 2006 and 2012. The study was conducted using the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, a prospective clinical registry of 40 hospitals performing bariatric surgery in the state of Michigan. Exposure Surgeon skill level. Main Outcomes and Measures Excess body weight loss at 1 year; resolution of medical comorbidities (hypertension, sleep apnea, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia), functional status, and patient satisfaction. Results Surgeons in the top and bottom quartiles had each been practicing for a mean of 11 years. Peer ratings of surgical skill varied from 2.6 to 4.8 on a 5-point scale. There was no difference between the best (top 25%) and worst (bottom 25%) performance quartiles when comparing excess body weight loss (67.2% vs 68.5%; P = .86) at 1 year. There were no differences in resolution of sleep apnea (62.6% vs 62.0%; P = .77), hypertension (47.1% vs 45.4%; P = .73), or hyperlipidemia (52.3% vs 63.4%; P = .45). Surgeons with the lowest skill rating had patients with higher rates of diabetes resolution (78.8%) when compared with the high-skill group (72.8%) ( P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance In contrast to its effect on early complications, surgical skill did not affect postoperative weight loss or resolution of medical comorbidities at 1 year after laparoscopic gastric bypass. These findings suggest that long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery may be less dependent on a surgeon’s operative skill and instead be driven by other factors. Operative technique was not assessed in this analysis and should be considered in future studies.

Management of cystic lesions of the pancreas (CLP) is controversial. In this study, we sought to evaluate national changes in the resection of CLP over time, to better understand the impact of evolving guidelines on CLP management.We used Medicare data to examine CLP resection among patients undergoing pancreatic resection between 2001 and 2012. Patients with a diagnosis of CLP were identified and compared to patients with non-CLP indications. We then examined changes over time in patient and hospital characteristics and outcomes among patients with a CLP diagnosis.We identified 56,419 Medicare patients undergoing pancreatic resection, of which 2129 had a CLP diagnosis. The annual number of CLP resections, and proportion of all resections performed for CLP increased significantly during the period, from 2.1% (65/3072) resections in 2001, to 4.5% (286/6348) in 2012 (p0.001). The proportion of CLP resections with a malignant diagnosis did not change (15.5% in 2001-2003 vs. 13.1% in 2010-2012, p = 0.4). Overall rates of 30-day mortality decreased significantly during the period (9.6% in 2001-2003 vs. 5.5% in 2010-2012, p0.001).CLP resections were performed with increasing frequency in Medicare patients between 2001 and 2012, but this did not correspond to increased diagnosis of malignancy. Additional research is needed to understand the influence of recent guidelines on management of CLP.

OBJECTIVE To examine the financial impact of quality improvement using Medicare payment data. BACKGROUND Demonstrating a business case for quality improvement--that is, that fewer complications translates into lower costs--is essential to justify investment in quality improvement. Prior research is limited to cross-sectional studies showing that patients with complications have higher costs. We designed a study to better evaluate the relationship between payments and complications by using quality improvement itself as a measured outcome. METHODS We used national Medicare data for patients undergoing general (n = 1,485,667) and vascular (n = 531,951) procedures. We calculated hospitals' rates of serious complications in 2 time periods: 2003-2004 and 2009-2010. We sorted hospitals into quintiles by the change in complication rates across these time periods. Costs were assessed using price-standardized Medicare payments, and regression analyses used to determine the average change in payments over time. RESULTS There was significant change in serious complication rates across the 2 time periods. The top 20% of hospitals demonstrated a 38% decrease (14.3% vs 11.6%, P < 0.001) in complications; in contrast the bottom 20% demonstrated a 25% increase (11.1% vs 16.5%, P < 0.001). There was a strong relationship between quality improvement and payments. The top hospitals reduced their payments by $1544 per patient (95% confidence interval: $1334-1755), whereas the bottom of hospitals had no significant change (average $67 increase, 95% confidence interval: -$123 to $258). CONCLUSIONS Hospitals that reduced their complications over time had significant reductions in Medicare payments. This demonstrates that payers are clearly incentivized to invest in quality improvement.

Background In 2011, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) implemented additional restrictions on resident work hours. Although the impact of these restrictions on the education of surgical trainees has been examined, the effect on patient safety remains poorly understood. Methods We used national Medicare Claims data for patients undergoing general (n = 1,223,815) and vascular (n = 475,262) surgery procedures in the 3 years preceding the duty hour changes (January, 2009–June, 2011) and the 18 months thereafter (July, 2011–December, 2012). Hospitals were stratified into quintiles by teaching intensity using a resident to bed ratio. We utilized a difference-in-differences analytic technique, using nonteaching hospitals as a control group, to compare risk-adjusted 30-day mortality, serious morbidity, readmission, and failure to rescue (FTR) rates before and after the duty hour changes. Results After duty hour reform, no changes were seen in the measured outcomes when comparing teaching with nonteaching hospitals. Even when stratifying by teaching intensity, there were no differences. For example, at the highest intensity teaching hospitals (resident/bed ratio of ≥0.6), mortality rates before and after the duty hour changes were 4.2% and 4.0%, compared with 4.7% and 4.4% for nonteaching hospitals (relative risk [RR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.89–1.07). Similarly, serious complication (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.98–1.06), FTR (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.87–1.04), and readmission (odds ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96–1.03) rates were unchanged. Conclusion In Medicare beneficiaries undergoing surgery at teaching hospitals, outcomes have not improved since the 2011 ACGME duty hour regulations.

Venous thromboembolism remains a prominent cause of morbidity and mortality following cancer surgery. Although evidence-based guidelines recommend major cancer surgery thromboprophylaxis starts before incision and continues at least 7-10 days postoperatively, the extent to which the guidelines are followed is unknown. We assessed variation in thromboprophylaxis practices for abdominal cancer surgery in a regional surgical collaborative.We studied abdominal resections for primary gastrointestinal, hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB), and neuroendocrine malignancies in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative from July 2012 to September 2013 (N = 2967 patients in 52 hospitals). We obtained detailed perioperative and postoperative pharmacologic and mechanical thromboprophylaxis information for patients without documented exemptions (e.g., active bleeding, allergy), and compared differences in procedure mix and operative complexity across hospitals based on their perioperative thromboprophylaxis rates. Additionally, we surveyed hospitals to identify variations in perioperative practice and barriers to prophylaxis administration.Overall, 40.4 % of eligible patients had perioperative pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis for abdominal cancer surgery, and 25.3 % of the highest-risk patients had evidence of inadequate postoperative prophylaxis (under-prophylaxis, either by dose or duration). Hospital perioperative thromboprophylaxis rates ranged from 0 to 96.1 %, and postoperative thromboprophylaxis rates ranged from 73.9 to 100 %. Epidural use was not independently associated with hospital pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis rates.Fewer than half of patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery receive perioperative thromboprophylaxis, and there is wide variation in hospital thromboprophylaxis utilization despite strong evidence-based guidelines supporting its use.

Background The 2011 ACGME regulations required substantial changes to the structure of general surgery residency programs, due primarily to the 16-hour in-house rule for PGY1 residents. However, the scope of changes that programs have undertaken to meet these requirements, and the educational impact of those changes, are poorly understood. Study Design We performed in-depth qualitative interviews with general surgery program directors. Twenty program directors participated in the study; interviews were conducted until adequate thematic saturation was achieved. Participants were recruited from a stratified random sampling of residency programs in the United States to ensure a representative cohort. Interviews focused on changes in call schedule, interns' educational requirements, development, and satisfaction. Results Most programs used a month-long night float (NF) rotation (14 of 20 [75%]). A minority of programs (5 of 20 [25%]) used a weekly rotating schedule, in which interns worked 5 to 6 nights in a month. Multiple programs (65%) had an NF in place before 2011; these programs made changes to and expanded their existing schedule to accommodate the new regulations. Commonly cited challenges to instituting NF included weekend coverage (60%) and providing adequate days off during day-to-night transition. Interns spent as much as 3 months of the year on NF. Only 5 programs made explicit changes to teaching schedules or developed a curriculum for residents on NF. Seventy-five percent of programs excused interns, explicitly or implicitly, from didactic teaching when on NF. Common themes noted by program directors included delayed maturation of trainees, interns being isolated from the team culture, and a conflict between the professional behaviors of "following the rules" and "doing what is right."