1. The value of point-of-care CD4+ and laboratory viral load in tailoring antiretroviral therapy monitoring strategies to resource limitations
- Author
-
Paolo Maggiore, Kenneth A. Freedberg, Trevor Peter, Robin Wood, Benjamin Osher, Pamela P. Pei, Rochelle P. Walensky, Katherine L. Rosettie, Robert A. Parker, Ilesh V. Jani, Emily P. Hyle, and Stephen C Resch
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Cost–benefit analysis ,business.industry ,Immunology ,medicine.disease ,030112 virology ,Virology ,Gross domestic product ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Infectious Diseases ,Resource (project management) ,Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) ,Environmental health ,Life expectancy ,Per capita ,Immunology and Allergy ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,business ,Viral load ,Point of care - Abstract
Objective To examine the clinical and economic value of point-of-care CD4 (POC-CD4) or viral load monitoring compared with current practices in Mozambique, a country representative of the diverse resource limitations encountered by HIV treatment programs in sub-Saharan Africa. Design/methods We use the Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing AIDS Complications-International model to examine the clinical impact, cost (2014 US$), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [$/year of life saved (YLS)] of ART monitoring strategies in Mozambique. We compare: monitoring for clinical disease progression [clinical ART monitoring strategy (CLIN)] vs. annual POC-CD4 in rural settings without laboratory services and biannual laboratory CD4 (LAB-CD4), biannual POC-CD4, and annual viral load in urban settings with laboratory services. We examine the impact of a range of values in sensitivity analyses, using Mozambique's 2014 per capita gross domestic product ($620) as a benchmark cost-effectiveness threshold. Results In rural settings, annual POC-CD4 compared to CLIN improves life expectancy by 2.8 years, reduces time on failed ART by 0.6 years, and yields an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $480/YLS. In urban settings, biannual POC-CD4 is more expensive and less effective than viral load. Compared to biannual LAB-CD4, viral load improves life expectancy by 0.6 years, reduces time on failed ART by 1.0 year, and is cost-effective ($440/YLS). Conclusion In rural settings, annual POC-CD4 improves clinical outcomes and is cost-effective compared to CLIN. In urban settings, viral load has the greatest clinical benefit and is cost-effective compared to biannual POC-CD4 or LAB-CD4. Tailoring ART monitoring strategies to specific settings with different available resources can improve clinical outcomes while remaining economically efficient.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF