Search

Background: ONO-4538-52/TASUKI-52 was performed in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan to determine the oncological effectiveness and safety of combining nivolumab or placebo with bevacizumab plus platinum chemotherapy for the initial (first-line) treatment of patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). At the interim analysis (minimum follow-up, 7.4 months), the independent radiology review committee-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the nivolumab arm, but overall survival (OS) data were immature., Methods: Here, we present the updated OS data. Patients with treatment-naïve stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nsNSCLC without driver mutations in ALK, EGFR, or ROS1, were randomized 1:1 to receive either nivolumab or placebo. Patients in both arms received paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab, administered 3-weekly for a maximum of 6 cycles. Nivolumab/placebo and bevacizumab were subsequently continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity., Results: Overall, 550 patients were randomized. At the time of the analysis (minimum follow-up: 19.4 months), the median OS was longer in the nivolumab arm than in the placebo arm (30.8 vs. 24.7 months; hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.94). The 12-month OS rates were 81.3% vs. 76.3% in the nivolumab vs. placebo arms, respectively. The respective 18-month OS rates were 69.0% vs. 61.9%., Conclusion: Nivolumab plus platinum chemotherapy and bevacizumab demonstrated longer OS vs. the placebo combination. We believe this regimen is viable as a standard, first-line treatment for patients with advanced nsNSCLC without driver mutations in ALK, EGFR, or ROS1., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Small molecule mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) inhibitors, such as crizotinib, capmatinib, and tepotinib, are treatment options for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in adult patients whose tumors have a mutation that leads to MET exon 14 skipping. In clinical trials, these MET inhibitors were associated with a high incidence of peripheral edema, although this was generally mild-to-moderate in severity. There is limited information about the mechanism involved in MET inhibitor-induced peripheral edema. Perturbation of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/MET signaling may disrupt the permeability balance in the vascular endothelium and thus promote edema development. Another potential mechanism is through effects on renal function, although this is unlikely to be the primary mechanism. Because edema is common in cancer patients and may not necessarily be caused by the cancer treatment, or other conditions that have similar symptoms to peripheral edema, a thorough assessment is required to ascertain the underlying cause. Before starting MET-inhibitor therapy, patients should be educated about the possibility of developing peripheral edema. Patient limb volume should be measured before initiating treatment, to aid assessment if symptoms develop. Since the exact mechanism of MET inhibitor-induced edema is unknown, management is empiric, with common approaches including compression stockings, specific exercises, massage, limb elevation, and/or diuretic treatment. Although not usually required, discontinuation of MET inhibitor treatment generally resolves peripheral edema. Early diagnosis and management, as well as patient information and education, are vital to decrease the clinical burden associated with edema, and to reinforce capmatinib treatment adherence., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Nazartinib, a novel third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, previously demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received ≤ 3 prior lines of systemic therapy. Herein, we report phase 2 efficacy and safety of first-line nazartinib., Methods: This single-arm, open-label, global study enrolled treatment-naive adult patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC harboring EGFR-activating mutations (eg, L858R and/or ex19del). Patients with neurologically stable and controlled brain metastases were also eligible. Patients received oral nazartinib 150 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC)-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1., Results: Forty-five patients received ≥ 1 dose of nazartinib. The median follow-up time from enrollment to data cutoff (November 1, 2019) was 30 months (range: 25-34). The BIRC-assessed ORR was 69% (95% CI, 53-82). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18 months (95% CI, 15-not estimable [NE]). The median overall survival was NE. In patients with baseline brain metastases (n = 18), the ORR and median PFS (95% CIs) were 67% (41-87) and 17 months (11-21). Seventeen of 18 patients had brain metastases as non-target lesions; the CNS lesions were absent/normalized in 9 of 17 (53%). Only 2 of 27 patients without baseline brain metastases developed new brain metastases postbaseline. Most frequent adverse events (≥ 25%, any grade, all-causality) were diarrhea (47%), maculopapular rash (38%), pyrexia (29%), cough, and stomatitis (27% each)., Conclusions: First-line nazartinib demonstrated promising efficacy, including clinically meaningful antitumor activity in the brain, and manageable safety in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02108964., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships that may be considered as potential competing interests: Dr. Tan reports consulting or advisory role for Novartis, Merck, Loxo, AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Amgen, and Janssen; travel, accommodation, and expenses from Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Roche; honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Novartis, Roche, and Pfizer; and research funding (institution) from Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Amgen, and AstraZeneca. Dr. S–W Kim reports advisory role for AstraZeneca, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, and Novartis; research funding from AstraZeneca and Novartis; and honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr. PonceAix reports consulting or advisory role for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, and Roche; speakers' bureau for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, and Roche; and travel, accommodations, expenses from AstraZeneca, Merck, and Roche. Dr. Sequist reports consulting or advisory role for AstraZeneca, Genentech/Roche, Janssen Oncology, and Takeda; and research funding (institution) from AstraZeneca, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Guardant Health, Johnson & Johnson, Loxo, Merck, Merrimack, Novartis, and Pfizer. Dr. Smit reports consulting or advisory role (institution) for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Merck KGaA, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Seattle Genetics, and Takeda; and research funding (institution) from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Roche/Genentech. Dr. Yang reports personal fees (advisory board) from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, MSD, Merck, Amgen, Yuhan, and Daiichi Sankyo; grants to conduct investigator initiated study from AstraZeneca; and institutional fees (advisory board) from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, MSD, Merck, Bayer, Yuhan, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, and GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Hida reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Clovis Oncology, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, MSD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Taiho Pharmaceutical; and research funding (institution) from Abbvie, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Clovis Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Eisai, Ignyta, Janssen, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Servier, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda. Dr. Toyozawa reports honoraria from Chugai Pharma, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Lilly Japan, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and MSD; and research funding (institution) from Abbvie, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Lilly Japan, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda. Dr. Felip reports consulting or advisory role for Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnology, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda; speakers' bureau for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CME outfitters, Eli Lilly, Medscape, MSD, Novartis, PeerVoice, Pfizer, Prime Oncology, Roche, Springer, Takeda, and touchIME; research funding (institution) from EMD Serono and Merck; and other relationship from GRÍFOLS. Dr. Wolf reports consulting or advisory role for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Ignyta, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Loxo, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, and Takeda; research funding (institution) from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Novartis, and Pfizer; and travel, accommodations, expenses from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Ignyta, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Loxo, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, and Takeda. Dr. Grohé reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, MSD Oncology, Novartis, Roche, and Takeda; consulting or advisory role for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and MSD Oncology; research funding (institution) from AstraZeneca; and travel, accommodations, expenses from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Roche. Dr. Leighl reports honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim; consulting or advisory role for Xcovery; research funding (institution) from EMD Serono, Guardant Health, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, and Roche Canada; and travel, accommodations, expenses from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Nektar, and Roche. Dr. Riely reports research funding (institution) from GlaxoSmithKline, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Mirati Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, and Takeda; patents, royalties, other intellectual property (institution): patent application submitted covering pulsatile use of erlotinib to treat or prevent brain metastases; travel, accommodations, expenses from MSD; and other relationship from Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, and Takeda. Dr. Cui and Dr. Belli report employment at Novartis and own Novartis stock. Dr. Zou is a former employee at Novartis and owns Novartis stock. Dr. Ghebremariam reports employment at Novartis, owns Novartis stock, and reports travel, accommodation, and expenses from Novartis. Leslie O'Sullivan-Djentuh and Dr. Giovannini report employment at Novartis. Dr. D-W Kim reports research funding (institution) from Alpha Biopharma, Amgen, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Hanmi, Janssen, Merus, Mirati Therapeutics, MSD, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Takeda, TP Therapeutics, Xcovery, and Yuhan; and travel, accommodations, expenses from Amgen and Daiichi Sankyo., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Purpose: The present study clarified the sensitivity of the BRAF tyrosine kinase inhibitor mechanism in patients with BRAF compound mutation and predicted the sensitivity using molecular dynamics simulation., Methods: We examined 16 BRAF tumors with p.V600E-positive non-small-cell lung cancer., Results: One patient (6.2%) had a BRAF p.V600E and p.K601_W604 compound mutation with a good clinical response to dabrafenib and trametinib. Molecular dynamics simulation also complemented the effect., Conclusions: The combination of a genetic analysis and computational simulation model may help predict the sensitivity for dabrafenib in cases with a rare BRAF compound mutation. The construction of a genomic and simulation fused database is important for the development of personalized medicine in this field., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

This prespecified subanalysis of the global, randomized controlled phase III KEYNOTE-024 study of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score of 50% or greater evaluated clinical outcomes among patients enrolled in Japan. Treatment consisted of pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (35 cycles) or platinum-based chemotherapy (four to six cycles). The primary end-point was progression-free survival; secondary end-points included overall survival and safety. Of 305 patients randomized in KEYNOTE-024 overall, 40 patients were enrolled in Japan (all received treatment: pembrolizumab, n = 21; chemotherapy, n = 19). The hazard ratio (HR) for progression-free survival by independent central review (data cut-off date, 10 July 2017) was 0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.64; one-sided, nominal P = .001). The HR for overall survival (data cut-off date, 15 February 2019) was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.17-0.91; one-sided, nominal P = .012). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 21/21 (100%) pembrolizumab-treated and 18/19 (95%) chemotherapy-treated patients; eight patients (38%) and nine patients (47%), respectively, had grade 3-5 events. Immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 11 patients (52%) and four patients (21%), respectively; four patients (19%) and one patient (5%), respectively, had grade 3-5 events. Consistent with results from KEYNOTE-024 overall, first-line pembrolizumab improved progression-free survival and overall survival vs chemotherapy with manageable safety among Japanese patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or greater. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02142738., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background: This international, randomized, double-blind phase III study (ONO-4538-52/TASUKI-52) evaluated nivolumab with bevacizumab and cytotoxic chemotherapy as first-line treatment for nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: Between June 2017 and July 2019, this study enrolled treatment-naïve patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 alterations. They were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive nivolumab or placebo in combination with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab every 3 weeks for up to six cycles, followed by nivolumab/placebo with bevacizumab until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent radiology review committee (IRRC)., Results: Overall, 550 patients from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan were randomized; of these patients, 273 and 275 received the nivolumab and placebo combinations, respectively. In the present preplanned interim analysis with a median follow up of 13.7 months, the IRRC-assessed median PFS was significantly longer in the nivolumab arm than in the placebo arm (12.1 versus 8.1 months; hazard ratio 0.56; 96.4% confidence interval 0.43-0.71; P < 0.0001). The PFS benefit was observed across all patients with any programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels including PD-L1-negative patients. The IRRC-assessed objective response rates were 61.5% and 50.5% in the nivolumab and placebo arms, respectively. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was comparable between the two arms; treatment-related adverse events leading to death were observed in five and four patients in the nivolumab and placebo arms, respectively., Conclusion: The TASUKI-52 regimen should be considered a viable new treatment strategy for treatment-naïve patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC., Competing Interests: Disclosure SS reports a grant from Ono and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, MSD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, ONO, Pfizer, and Taiho. J-SL, J-HK, HRK, and KHL report a grant from Ono. NI reports grants from Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, MSD KK, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and Taiho; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Eli Lilly, MSD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Ono, and Taiho. TH reports grants from AbbVie, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Ignyta, Janssen, Kissei, Merck Serono, MSD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, ONO, Pfizer, Taiho, and Takeda; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Chugai, Kissei, MSD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taiho, and Takeda. TY reports grants from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Ono, and Takeda; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, and Novartis. HT reports grants from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Eli Lilly, MSD, Ono, and Taiho; personal fees from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, and Taiho. C-TY reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, MSD, Ono, Pfizer, and Roche. MN reports grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, ONO, Pfizer, Taiho, and Takeda; personal fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Merck Biopharma, MSD, Novartis, ONO, Pfizer, Taiho, Takeda, and TEIJIN. YO reports grants from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Ignyta, Janssen, Kyorin, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, MSD, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Ono, Taiho, and Takeda; personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Kyorin, MSD, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taiho, and Takeda. TT reports grant from Ono and personal fees from Chugai and Lilly. NY reports grants from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, MSD, Ono, Pfizer, Shionogi, Taiho, Terumo, Toppan Printing, Tosoh, and Tsumura; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly Japan, MSD, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Taiho, Takeda, and Thermo Fisher Scientific. C-JY reports other support from Ono. HA reports grants from Chugai and MSD; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, MSD, and Ono. YN and NS are employees of Ono. KN reports grants from A2 Healthcare, AbbVie, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer Yakuhin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, CMIC Shift Zero, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EP-CRSU, EPS, EPS International, GRITSONE ONCOLOGY, ICON Japan, inVentiv Health, Kissei, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Linical, Merck Serono/Merck Biopharma, MSD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Ono, Otsuka, PAREXEL International, Pfizer, Pfizer R&D Japan, Quintiles/IQVIA Services JAPAN, Symbio, Syneos Health, Taiho, and Takeda; personal fees from 3H Clinical Trial, AbbVie, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer Yakuhin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Care Net, Chugai, Clinical Trial, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli KYORIN, Lilly, Medical Mobile Communications, Medical Review, MEDICUS SHUPPAN Publishers, Merck Serono/Merck Biopharma, MSD, NANZANDO, Nichi-Iko, Nikkei Business Publications, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Ono, Pfizer, Reno. Medical, Roche Diagnostics, Symbio, Taiho, Takeda, Thermo Fisher Scientific, YODOSHA, and YOMIURI TELECASTING; other supports from Eli Lilly, KYORIN, Ono, Pfizer, and Takeda., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Preliminary data suggest that combining savolitinib, a potent and highly selective MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), with osimertinib, a third-generation, irreversible, oral epidermal growth factor receptor-TKI (EGFR-TKI), may overcome MET-based resistance to EGFR-TKIs., Objective: To investigate the safety and tolerability of savolitinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid malignancies., Patients and Methods: In Part C of the phase Ib, multi-arm, open-label, multicenter TATTON study, two cohorts of Japanese adult patients were evaluated across six study centers in Japan. Patients with advanced solid malignancies received oral savolitinib monotherapy 400 mg once daily (qd), escalating to 600 mg; patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm) non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) who progressed on prior EGFR-TKI received oral osimertinib 80 mg+savolitinib 300/400/600 mg qd combination therapy. Primary endpoints: safety/tolerability of savolitinib±osimertinib, and maximum tolerated dose(s) (MTD) definition., Results: Seventeen patients received monotherapy; 12 received combination. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs): with monotherapy, 400 mg, none reported; 600 mg, n = 3/9 evaluable patients (33%) reported DLTs (grade 3 and 4 alanine aminotransferase and aspartate transaminase increased, and grade 4 drug-induced liver injury). With combination: 400 mg, 1/6 (17%) reported DLTs (grade 2 fatigue, nausea, and myalgia); 300 mg, none reported; 600 mg, 3/4 (75%) reported DLTs (grade 2 pyrexia, grade 3 skin reaction, and anaphylactic shock). Grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 41% of patients receiving monotherapy and 33% receiving combination. TATTON is no longer recruiting patients., Conclusions: The MTD of savolitinib was 400 mg qd in both cohorts. Data demonstrate an acceptable safety profile for savolitinib alone, or with osimertinib., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02143466; 21 May 2014.

MET mutations leading to exon 14 skipping (METΔex14) are strong molecular drivers for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Capmatinib is a highly potent, selective oral MET inhibitor that showed clinically meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile in a global phase II study (GEOMETRY mono-1, NCT02414139) in patients with advanced METΔex14-mutated/MET-amplified NSCLC. We report results of preplanned analyses of 45 Japanese patients according to MET status (METΔex14-mutated or MET-amplified) and line of therapy (first- [1L] or second-/third-line [2/3L]). The starting dose was 400 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) assessed by a blinded independent review committee. A key secondary endpoint was duration of response (DOR). Among METΔex14-mutated patients, in the 1L group, one patient achieved partial response (DOR of 4.24 months) and the other had stable disease. In the 2/3L group, the ORR was 36.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.9%-69.2%), median DOR was not evaluable, and progression-free survival was 4.70 months. One patient (2/3L group) showed partial resolution of brain lesions per independent neuroradiologist review. In MET-amplified patients with a MET gene copy number of ≥10, the ORR was 100% (2/2 patients) in the 1L group and 45.5% (5/11 patients) in the 2/3L group, with DOR of 8.2 and 8.3 months, respectively. Common treatment-related adverse events among the 45 Japanese patients were blood creatinine increased (53.3%), nausea (35.6%), and oedema peripheral (31.1%); most were grade 1/2 severity. In conclusion, capmatinib was effective and well tolerated by Japanese patients with METΔex14/MET-amplified NSCLC, consistent with the overall population., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background: Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) can be detected on computed tomography (CT) in lung cancer patients and have an association with mortality in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the significance of ILA for mortality in patients with stage I NSCLC using Boston Lung Cancer Study cohort., Methods: Two hundred and thirty-one patients with stage I NSCLC from 2000 to 2011 were investigated in this retrospective study (median age, 69 years; 93 males, 138 females). ILA was scored on baseline CT scans prior to treatment using a 3-point scale (0 = no evidence of ILA, 1 = equivocal for ILA, 2 = ILA) by a sequential reading method. ILA score 2 was considered the presence of ILA. The difference of overall survival (OS) for patients with different ILA scores were tested via log-rank test and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) including ILA score, age, sex, smoking status, and treatment as the confounding variables., Results: ILA was present in 22 out of 231 patients (9.5%) with stage I NSCLC. The presence of ILA was associated with shorter OS (patients with ILA score 2, median 3.85 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.36 - not reached (NR)]; patients with ILA score 0 or 1, median 10.16 years [95%CI: 8.65 - NR]; P <  0.0001). In a Cox proportional hazards model, the presence of ILA remained significant for increased risk for death (HR = 2.88, P = 0.005) after adjusting for age, sex, smoking and treatment., Conclusions: ILA was detected on CT in 9.5% of patients with stage I NSCLC. The presence of ILA was significantly associated with a shorter OS and could be an imaging marker of shorter survival in stage I NSCLC.

Background: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) genotyping in plasma using the cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 (cobas) is the first liquid biopsy as a companion diagnosis to identify the EGFR T790M mutation (T790M) after the failure of treatment of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (1st generation, gefitinib [G] and erlotinib [E] and 2nd generation, afatinib [A]). This study investigated the clinical utility of a liquid biopsy for patients who acquired resistance to afatinib., Methods: We prospectively collected plasma from 51 patients who had acquired resistance to afatinib between April 2015 and November 2016 to evaluate the frequency of T790M by cobas and digital droplet PCR (UMIN000025112). Additionally, we retrospectively reviewed 38 patients who tested by cobas in plasma after G/E failure to compare for T790M detection between A and with G/E., Results: The detection rate of EGFR-driver and T790M in plasma in patients treated with A (A group) as a first-line EGFR-TKI was lower than with G/E followed by A (G/E→A group), although the differences were not significant (EGFR-driver: 41% [A] vs. 67% [G/E→A], P=0.1867; and T790M: 8% [A] vs. 17% [G/E→A], P=0.5798). In first-line setting, the detection rate for EGFR-driver and T790M in plasma by cobas was lower in A group than in G/E group, although there was no significant difference (EGFR-driver: 34% [A] vs. 52% [G/E], P=0.2072; and T790M: 10% [A] vs. 27% [G/E], P=0.1161)., Conclusion: The detection of EGFR-driver and T790M in plasma by cobas in patients treated with afatinib might be lower than with G/E in a real-world setting.

Background: Two phase II studies in Japan examined the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, a programmed cell death 1 receptor inhibitor, in patients with advanced squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (ONO-4538-05 and ONO-4538-06). We examined the long-term efficacy and safety of nivolumab in these patients treated for up to 5 years., Methods: Patients with squamous (N = 35) or non-squamous (N = 76) non-small cell lung cancer received nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) until disease progression/death. Overall survival and progression-free survival were assessed at 5 years after starting treatment in separate and pooled analyses. Safety was evaluated in terms of treatment-related adverse events., Results: A total of 17 patients were alive at the database lock (26 July 2019). The median overall survival (95% confidence interval) and 5-year survival rate were 16.3 (12.4-25.2) months and 14.3% in squamous patients, 17.1 (13.3-23.0) months and 19.4% in non-squamous patients and 17.1 (14.2-20.6) months and 17.8% in the pooled analysis, respectively. Programmed death ligand-1 expression tended to be greater among 5-year survivors than in non-survivors (P = 0.0703). Overall survival prolonged with increasing programmed death ligand-1 expression, with 5-year survival rates of 11.8, 21.8 and 41.7% in patients with programmed death ligand-1 expression of <1, ≥1-<50 and ≥50%, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events in ≥10% of patients (pooled analysis) included rash (15.3%), malaise (14.4%), decreased appetite (14.4%), pyrexia (14.4%) and nausea (10.8%)., Conclusions: Long-term survival with nivolumab was observed in patients with squamous or non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. No new safety signals were reported after ≥5 years of follow-up., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically changed the strategy used to treat patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the vast majority of patients eventually develop progressive disease (PD) and acquire resistance to ICIs. Some patients experience oligoprogressive disease. Few retrospective studies have evaluated clinical efficacy in patients with oligometastatic progression who received local therapy after ICI treatment. We conducted a retrospective analysis of advanced NSCLC patients who received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy with nivolumab or pembrolizumab to evaluate the effects of ICIs on the patterns of progression and the efficacy of local therapy for oligoprogressive disease. Of the 307 patients treated with ICIs, 148 were evaluated in our study; 42 were treated with pembrolizumab, and 106 were treated with nivolumab. Thirty-eight patients showed oligoprogression. Male sex, a lack of driver mutations, and smoking history were significantly correlated with the risk of oligoprogression. Primary lesions were most frequently detected at oligoprogression sites (15 patients), and 6 patients experienced abdominal lymph node (LN) oligoprogression. Four patients showed evidence of new abdominal LN oligometastases. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the local therapy group and the switch therapy group (reached vs. not reached, P = .456). We summarized clinical data on the response of oligoprogressive NSCLC to ICI therapy. The results may help to elucidate the causes of ICI resistance and indicate that the use of local therapy as the initial treatment in this setting is feasible treatment option., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

This prespecified subanalysis of the global, randomized controlled phase III KEYNOTE-024 study of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score of 50% or higher evaluated clinical outcomes among patients enrolled in Japan. Treatment consisted of pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (35 cycles) or platinum-based chemotherapy (four to six cycles). The primary end-point was progression-free survival; secondary end-points included overall survival and safety. Of 305 patients randomized in KEYNOTE-024 overall, 40 patients were enrolled in Japan (all received treatment: pembrolizumab, n = 21; chemotherapy, n = 19). Median progression-free survival was 41.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2-42.5) months with pembrolizumab and 4.1 (95% CI, 2.8-8.3) months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.27 [95% CI, 0.11-0.65]; one-sided, nominal P = .001). Median overall survival was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 22.9-NR) and 21.5 (95% CI, 5.2-35.0) months, respectively (HR, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.17-0.91]; one-sided, nominal P = .012). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 21/21 (100%) pembrolizumab-treated and 18/19 (95%) chemotherapy-treated patients; eight patients (38%) and nine patients (47%), respectively, had grade 3-5 events. Immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 11 pembrolizumab-treated patients (52%) and four chemotherapy-treated patients (21%), respectively; four patients (19%) and one patient (5%), respectively, had grade 3-5 events. Consistent with results from KEYNOTE-024 overall, first-line pembrolizumab improved progression-free survival and overall survival vs chemotherapy with manageable safety among Japanese patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR/ALK alterations and a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of 50% or higher. The trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02142738., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

We constructed a data set of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients, and compared the overall survival of first-generation (1G), and second-generation (2G) EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in clinical practice using a propensity score. We reviewed the clinical data of consecutive EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients who received EGFR-TKI therapy between January 2008 and August 2017 at 11 institutions in Japan. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). When comparing OS between 1G and 2G EGFR-TKIs, propensity score analyses were performed using 2 methods: matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). (Clinical Trial information: UMIN000030121) In total, 1400 patients from 11 institutions were enrolled in this study, and the data from the 1366 patients who received only EGFR-TKI therapy were analyzed (gefitinib [GEF], N = 732; erlotinib [ERL], N = 416; afatinib, N = 218). Median OS times (months [95%CI]) were 29.7 [27.5-33.5] in the 1G group (gefitinib, 32.0 [28.1-35.8]; erlotinib, 27.5 [23.9-31.7]), and 38.6 [32.2-NR] in the 2G group (afatinib), respectively. The trend of longer OS for afatinib against 1G EGFR-TKIs remained, even after adjusted by propensity score. (unadjusted, hazard ratio [HR] 0.676, P = .0023; adjusted by IPTW, HR 0.685 P < .0001; adjusted by matching, HR 0.725, P = .0418). Exploratory analysis showed that OS using the 2G EGFR-TKI was superior to that of the 1G EGFR-TKIs, suggesting the potential of sequential therapy of 2G EGFR-TKI followed by osimertinib. (HR 0.419, P = .0519) Real-world data analysis using 1354 data records, using propensity scoring, indicated that 2G EGFR-TKI had a trend of longer OS compared with 1G EGFR-TKIs., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Lorlatinib is a potent, brain-penetrant, third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)/ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that is active against most known resistance mutations. This is an ongoing phase 1/2, multinational study (NCT01970865) investigating the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of lorlatinib in ALK-rearranged/ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with or without intracranial (IC) metastases. Because patterns of ALK TKI use in Japan differ from other regions, we present a subgroup analysis of Japanese patients. Patients were enrolled into six expansion (EXP) cohorts based on ALK/ROS1 mutation status and treatment history. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) and the IC-ORR based on independent central review. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic evaluations. At data cutoff, 39 ALK-rearranged/ROS1-rearranged Japanese patients were enrolled across the six expansion cohorts; all received lorlatinib 100 mg once daily. Thirty-one ALK-rearranged patients previously treated with ≥1 ALK TKI (EXP2 to EXP5) were evaluable for ORR and 15 were evaluable for IC-ORR. The ORR and the IC-ORR for Japanese patients in EXP2-5 were 54.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36.0-72.7) and 46.7% (95% CI: 21.3-73.4), respectively. Among patients who had received prior alectinib only (EXP3B), the ORR was 42.9%; 95% CI: 9.9-81.6). The most common treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) was hypercholesterolemia (79.5%). Hypertriglyceridemia was the most common grade 3/4 TRAE (25.6%). Single-dose and multiple-dose pharmacokinetic profiles among Japanese patients were similar to those in non-Japanese patients. Lorlatinib showed clinically meaningful responses and IC responses among ALK-rearranged Japanese patients with NSCLC who received ≥1 prior ALK TKI, including meaningful responses among those receiving prior alectinib only. Lorlatinib was generally well tolerated., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background: Among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), MET exon 14 skipping mutations occur in 3 to 4% and MET amplifications occur in 1 to 6%. Capmatinib, a selective inhibitor of the MET receptor, has shown activity in cancer models with various types of MET activation., Methods: We conducted a multiple-cohort, phase 2 study evaluating capmatinib in patients with MET -dysregulated advanced NSCLC. Patients were assigned to cohorts on the basis of previous lines of therapy and MET status ( MET exon 14 skipping mutation or MET amplification according to gene copy number in tumor tissue). Patients received capmatinib (400-mg tablet) twice daily. The primary end point was overall response (complete or partial response), and the key secondary end point was response duration; both end points were assessed by an independent review committee whose members were unaware of the cohort assignments., Results: A total of 364 patients were assigned to the cohorts. Among patients with NSCLC with a MET exon 14 skipping mutation, overall response was observed in 41% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29 to 53) of 69 patients who had received one or two lines of therapy previously and in 68% (95% CI, 48 to 84) of 28 patients who had not received treatment previously; the median duration of response was 9.7 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 13.0) and 12.6 months (95% CI, 5.6 to could not be estimated), respectively. Limited efficacy was observed in previously treated patients with MET amplification who had a gene copy number of less than 10 (overall response in 7 to 12% of patients). Among patients with MET amplification and a gene copy number of 10 or higher, overall response was observed in 29% (95% CI, 19 to 41) of previously treated patients and in 40% (95% CI, 16 to 68) of those who had not received treatment previously. The most frequently reported adverse events were peripheral edema (in 51%) and nausea (in 45%); these events were mostly of grade 1 or 2., Conclusions: Capmatinib showed substantial antitumor activity in patients with advanced NSCLC with a MET exon 14 skipping mutation, particularly in those not treated previously. The efficacy in MET -amplified advanced NSCLC was higher in tumors with a high gene copy number than in those with a low gene copy number. Low-grade peripheral edema and nausea were the main toxic effects. (Funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals; GEOMETRY mono-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02414139.)., (Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: RNA-based sequencing is considered ideal for detecting pathogenic fusion-genes compared to DNA-based assays and provides valuable information about the relative expression of driver genes. However, RNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue has issues with both quantity and quality, making RNA-based sequencing difficult in clinical practice. Analyzing stamp-derived RNA with next-generation sequencing (NGS) can address the above-mentioned obstacles. In this study, we validated the analytical specifications and clinical performance of our custom panel for RNA-based assays on the Ion Torrent platform., Methods: To evaluate our custom RNA lung panel, we first examined the gene sequences of RNA derived from 35 NSCLC tissues with diverse backgrounds by conventional methods and NGS. Next, we moved to the clinical phase, where clinical samples (all stamp-derived RNA) were used to examine variants. In the clinical phase we conducted an NGS analysis while simultaneously applying conventional approaches to assess the feasibility and validity of the panel in clinical practice., Results: In the prerun phase, all of the variants confirmed with conventional methods were detected by NGS. In the clinical phase, a total of 80 patients were enrolled and 80 tumor specimens were sequenced from February 2018 to December 2018. There were 66 cases in which the RNA concentration was too low to be measured, but sequencing was successful in the vast majority of cases. The concordance between NGS and conventional methods was 95.0%., Conclusions: RNA extraction using stamp specimens and panel sequencing by NGS were considered applicable in clinical settings., Key Points: Significant findings of the study Next-generation sequencing using RNA from stamp specimens was able to detect driver gene changes in non-small cell lung cancer including fusion genes with the same accuracy as conventional methods. What this study adds Using RNA from stamp specimens obtained from biopsy increases the number of candidate cases for RNA sequencing in clinical settings., (© 2020 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

BRAF mutations are rare driver mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), accounting for 1%-2% of the driver mutations, and the mutation spectrum has a wide range in contrast to other tumors. While V600E is a dominant mutation in melanoma, more than half of the mutations in NSCLCs are non-V600E. However, treatment with dabrafenib plus trametinib targets the BRAF V600E mutation exclusively. Therefore, distinguishing between V600E and non-V600E mutations is crucial for biomarker testing in NSCLC in order to determine treatment of choice. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the BRAF V600E mutation-specific antibody is clinically used in melanoma patients, but little is known about its application in NSCLC, particularly with regard to the assay performance for non-V600E mutations. In the present study, we examined 117 tumors with BRAF mutations, including 30 with non-V600E mutations, using BRAF mutation-specific IHC. None of the tumors with non-V600E mutations, including two compound mutations, showed a positive reaction. Furthermore, all V600E mutations were positive except for one case with combined BRAF V600E and K601&#95;W604 deletion. Our findings confirmed that the BRAF V600E mutation-specific IHC is specific without any cross-reactions to non-V600E mutations, suggesting that this assay can be a useful screening tool in clinical practice., (© 2020 Japanese Society of Pathology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a predictor of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment efficacy. The clinical efficacy of ICIs for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring major mutations, such as EGFR or ALK mutations, is limited. We genotyped 190 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy, and examined the efficacy in NSCLC patients with or without major mutations. Among the patients enrolled in the genotyping study, 47 patients harbored EGFR mutations, 25 patients had KRAS mutations, 5 patients had a HER2 mutation, 6 patients had a BRAF mutation, and 7 patients had ALK rearrangement. The status of PD-L1 expression was evaluated in 151 patients, and the rate of high PD-L1 expression (≥50%) was significantly higher in patients with ALK mutations. The progression-free survival was 0.6 (95% CI: 0.2-2.1) months for ALK -positive patients and 1.8 (95% CI: 1.2-2.1) months for EGFR -positive patients. All patients with ALK rearrangement showed disease progression within three months from the initiation of anti-PD-1 treatment. Our data suggested that ICI treatment was significantly less efficacious in patients with ALK rearrangement than in patients with EGFR mutations, and PD-L1 expression was not a critical biomarker for ICI treatment for patients with one of these mutations.

Objectives: SPECTRA is a multicenter, randomized phase II study of chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP) plus S-1 versus CDDP plus pemetrexed (PEM) in combination with thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for locally advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer, in order to determine which of these two regimens might be preferable for comparison with standard therapies in a future phase III study., Materials and Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to receive CDDP + S-1 (CDDP 60 mg/m 2 on day 1 and S-1 80 mg/m2 on days 1-14, every 4 weeks, up to 4 cycles) or CDDP + PEM (CDDP 75 mg/m 2 + PEM 500 mg/m 2 on day 1, every 3 weeks, up to 4 cycles) combined with TRT (60 Gy in 30 fractions). The primary endpoint was the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The sample size had been set at 100 patients., Results: A total of 102 patients were randomized to receive CDDP + S-1 or CDDP + PEM (CDDP + S-1, n = 52; CDDP + PEM, n = 50) between January 2013 and October 2016. The results in the CDDP + S1 group and CDDP + PEM group were as follows: completion rates of TRT (60 Gy)/chemotherapy (4 cycles) was 92 %/73 % and 98 %/86 %, respectively; the response rates were 60 % and 64 %, respectively; median PFS after a median follow-up of 32.1 months, 12.7/13.8 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.16; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.73-1.84); 2-year PFS rate, 36.5 % (95 % CI, 23.5-49.6)/32.1 % (95 %CI, 18.9-45.4); median OS, 48.3/59.1 months (HR = 1.05; 95 %CI, 0.58-1.90); 2-year OS rate, 69.2 % (95 %CI, 56.7-81.8)/66.4 % (95 %CI, 53.0-79.9); Grade 3 toxicities: febrile neutropenia (12 %/2 %), anorexia (8 %/16 %), diarrhea (8 %/0 %), esophagitis (6 %/8 %), and neutropenia (35 %/50 %); Grade 2 or worse radiation pneumonitis, 15 % (8 patients)/4 % (2 patients)., Conclusion: The 2-year PFS rate in the CDDP + S-1 arm was higher than that in the CDDP + PEM arm. Both treatments were safe, with manageable toxicities., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest S.N. reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Taiho, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Shionogi, and Yakult, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, MSD, and Eli Lilly, grants from Merck Serono, outside the submitted work. T.Y. reports personal fees from Chugai, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and Bristol‐Myers Squibb, outside the submitted work. K.S. reports personal fees from Chugai, Ono, Novartis, and Taiho, outside the submitted work. A.O. reports personal fees from Taiho, Ono, Chugai, Novartis, AstraZeneca, and MSD, outside the submitted work. T.S reports grants and personal fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Kissei, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Nippon Kayaku, Ono, Roche, Taiho, Thermo Fisher Scientific, and Yakult, grants from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, LOXO Oncology, Merck Serono, outside the submitted work. M.N. reports grants and non-financial support from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Ono, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Taiho, AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis, personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Sankyo Healthcare, Taiho, Merck Serono, grants from Astellas, outside the submitted work. N.Y. reports grants and personal fee from Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono, and Takeda, grants from Taiho, Quintiles, Astellas, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Kyowa-Hakko Kirin, Bayer, Janssen Pharma, MSD, and Merck, personal fees from AstraZeneca, Otsuka, Cimic, and Sysmex, outside the submitted work. T.H. reports grants and personal fees from Ono, Chugai, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Kissei, Taiho, Pfizer, Clovis Oncology, MSD, and Ignyta, grants from Merck Serono, Eisai, Takeda, Dainippon Sumitomo, Abbvie, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Daiichi Sankyo, Astellas, Servier, Janssen, outside the submitted work. H.O. reports grants from Takeda, MSD, Ono, AstraZeneca, Merck, Chugai, Taiho, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Daiich Sankyo, outside the submitted work. T.K. reports grants and personal fee from AstraZeneca, MSD, and Chugai, personal fees from Eli Lilly, Ono, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. M.S. reports grants and personal fees from Chugai, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ono, MSD, and Novartis, grants from Takeda, AbbVie, Ignyta, and Loxo Oncology, personal fees from Taiho, and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. K.G. reports grants and personal fees from Taiho, Chugai, Ono, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, DAIICHI SANKYO, Pfizer, Novartis, Takeda, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, RIKEN GENESIS, AbbVie, and Life Technologies, grants from Sumitomo Dainippon, Astellas, Eisai, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Ignyta, Janssen, Loxo Oncology, Sysmex Corporation, and Oxonc, personal fees from F.Hoffmann-La Roche, SRL, and Nippon Kayaku, outside the submitted work. T.Y. reports grants and personal fees from Takeda, Chugai, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Bayer, grants from Ono, Merck Serono, Astellas, and Eli Lilly, personal fees from Taiho, Pfizer, Sysmex, Huya Biosciences, and Gilead Sciences, outside the submitted work. Y.O. reports grants and personal fees from Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Taiho, AstraZeneca, Chugai, ONO, Pfizer, MSD, Kyorin, Takeda, Novartis, AbbVie, grants from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, LOXO, and Janssen, personal fees from Celltrion, outside the submitted work. T.A. declares no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Targeted inhibition of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) has been widely used for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ALK rearrangements. We performed tumor volume analysis of ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC treated with crizotinib to identify an early predictive marker for prolonged survival., Materials and Methods: Cases of 42 patients with ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC (16 men, 26 women; median age: 55.7 y) treated with crizotinib as their first ALK-directed therapy were retrospectively studied. Tumor volume measurements of dominant lung lesions were performed on baseline computed tomography and follow-up computed tomography at 8 weeks of therapy. The relationships between the 8-week volume change (%) and overall survival (OS) were investigated., Results: The 8-week tumor volume change ranged from -99.3% to 117.5% (median: -57.7%). Using the 25th percentile of the 8-week volume change of -74%, 11 patients with >74% volume decrease at 8 weeks had a significantly longer OS compared with 31 patients with ≤74% decrease (median OS: 92.0 vs. 22.8 mo; P=0.0048). In multivariable analyses using Cox proportional hazards models, the 8-week volume decrease of >74% was significantly associated with longer OS (hazard ratio=0.14, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.59; Cox P=0.008) after adjusting for tumor stage (stage IV vs. recurrent NSCLC, hazard ratio=5.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.29-24.3; P=0.02)., Conclusions: The 8-week tumor volume decrease of >74% is significantly associated with longer OS in patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC treated with crizotinib.

Aim: Acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors is inevitable in non-small-cell lung cancer. To inform subsequent treatment decisions, we retrospectively assessed therapies following afatinib in Japanese patients from LUX-Lung 3. Patients & methods: LUX-Lung 3 was a randomized, open-label, Phase III study of afatinib versus cisplatin/pemetrexed in treatment-naive patients with EGFR mutation-positive ( EGFR m + ) advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Results: Among 47 Japanese patients who discontinued first-line afatinib, 91/81/62% received ≥one/two/three subsequent therapies. The most common second-line therapies were platinum-based chemotherapy (38%) and a first-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (17%). Median overall survival (afatinib vs cisplatin/pemetrexed) was 47.8 versus 35.0 months (not significant). Conclusion: First-line afatinib does not appear to diminish suitability for subsequent therapies in EGFR m + non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: This study assesses different technologies for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations from circulating tumor DNA in patients with EGFR T790M-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from the AURA3 study (NCT02151981), and it evaluates clinical responses to osimertinib and platinum-pemetrexed according to the plasma T790M status., Methods: Tumor tissue biopsy samples were tested for T790M during screening with the cobas EGFR Mutation Test (cobas tissue). Plasma samples were collected at screening and at the baseline and were retrospectively analyzed for EGFR mutations with the cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 (cobas plasma), droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR; Biodesix), and next-generation sequencing (NGS; Guardant360, Guardant Health)., Results: With cobas tissue test results as a reference, the plasma T790M positive percent agreement (PPA) was 51% (110 of 215 samples) by cobas plasma, 58% (110 of 189) by ddPCR, and 66% (136 of 207) by NGS. Plasma T790M detection was associated with a larger median baseline tumor size (56 mm for T790M-positive vs 39 mm for T790M-negative; P < .0001) and the presence of extrathoracic disease (58% for M1b-positive vs 39% for M0-1a-positive; P = .002). Progression-free survival (PFS) was prolonged in randomized patients (tissue T790M-positive) with a T790M-negative cobas plasma result in comparison with those with a T790M-positive plasma result in both osimertinib (median, 12.5 vs 8.3 months) and platinum-pemetrexed groups (median, 5.6 vs 4.2 months)., Conclusions: PPA was similar between ddPCR and NGS assays; both were more sensitive than cobas plasma. All 3 test platforms are suitable for routine clinical practice. In patients with tissue T790M-positive NSCLC, an absence of detectable plasma T790M at the baseline is associated with longer PFS, which may be attributed to a lower disease burden., (© 2019 American Cancer Society.)

Objectives: The J-ALEX study compared the efficacy and safety of alectinib with crizotinib in Japanese patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Superiority in independent review facility (IRF)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was demonstrated for alectinib at the second pre-planned interim PFS analysis (data cutoff: December 3, 2015; hazard ratio [HR] 0.34, 99.7 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.71, P < 0.0001). We report final PFS data and the second pre-planned interim analysis of overall survival (OS) and safety (data cutoff: June 30, 2018)., Methods: Patients aged ≥20 years who were ALK inhibitor-naïve and chemotherapy-naïve, or had received one prior chemotherapy regimen, were randomized to receive alectinib 300 mg (n = 103) or crizotinib 250 mg (n = 104) twice daily. The primary end point was IRF-assessed PFS. Secondary end points included OS and safety. All patients entered survival follow-up in July 2018., Results: Median follow-up was 42.4 months for alectinib and 42.2 months for crizotinib. Sustained improvement in IRF-assessed PFS with alectinib was shown (HR 0.37, 95 % CI: 0.26-0.52; median PFS 34.1 months vs 10.2 months crizotinib). At the second interim OS analysis, superiority of alectinib to crizotinib could not be concluded (stratified HR 0.80, 99.8799 % CI: 0.35-1.82, stratified log-rank P = 0.3860; median OS not reached alectinib vs 43.7 months crizotinib). Fewer alectinib-treated patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events (36.9 % vs 60.6 % crizotinib)., Conclusions: At the final PFS analysis, alectinib continued to demonstrate superiority in IRF-assessed PFS versus crizotinib in ALK-inhibitor-naïve ALK-positive NSCLC, with a favorable safety profile. OS follow-up continues., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Purpose We investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of TAS-121, a novel, potent, and highly selective third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) in Japanese patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with EGFR-TKI. Methods This was an open-label, non-randomized, multi-center, dose escalation, phase I study conducted in three phases (dose escalation, expansion, and extension phases). TAS-121 was administered orally once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) under fasting conditions in a 21-day treatment cycle. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during Cycle 1 of the dose escalation phase. Results In total, 134 patients received treatment. Five and three patients presented a DLT with the QD and BID regimens, respectively. The DLTs were drug-induced liver injury, platelet count decreased, urticaria, interstitial lung disease, and left ventricular failure. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 10 mg/day QD and 8 mg/day BID in the dose escalation phase. The most common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were dermatological toxicity (89.6%), platelet count decreased (67.2%), and pyrexia (44%) among all patients. Rate of discontinuations due to ADRs at the MTD level were 11.1% with TAS-121 10 mg/day QD and 7.9% with TAS-121 8 mg/day BID. Among 86 T790M-positive patients (confirmed by blood serum sampling in most patients), the objective response rate (ORR) was 28% and highest at 8 mg/day BID (39%). Among 16 T790M-negative patients, the ORR was 19%. Conclusions TAS-121 was well tolerated up to the MTD and demonstrated antitumor activity in Japanese T790M-positive NSCLC patients. Clinical trial registration: JapicCTI-142651.

Background: Nivolumab is a programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor inhibitor antibody that enhances immune system antitumor activity. It is associated with longer overall survival (OS) than the standard treatment of docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced squamous (SQ) and non-squamous (non-SQ) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We previously conducted two phase II studies of nivolumab in Japanese patients with SQ (ONO-4538-05) and non-SQ (ONO-4538-06) NSCLC, showing overall response rates (ORRs) (95% CI) of 25.7% (14.2-42.1) and 22.4% (14.5-32.9), respectively, with acceptable toxicity. In this analysis, we more precisely estimated the long-term safety and efficacy in patients with SQ and non-SQ NSCLC by pooling data from these two trials., Methods: SQ (N = 35) and non-SQ (N = 76) NSCLC patients received nivolumab (3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks) until progression or discontinuation. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A pooled analysis of SQ and non-SQ patients was also performed., Results: In SQ NSCLC patients, the median OS (95% CI) was 16.3 months (12.4-25.2), and the estimated 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates were 71.4% (53.4-83.5), 37.1% (21.6-52.7), and 20.0% (8.8-34.4), respectively. In non-SQ NSCLC patients, median OS was 17.1 months (13.3-23.0), and the estimated 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 68.0% (56.2-77.3), 37.4% (26.5-48.1), and 31.9% (21.7-42.5), respectively. When SQ NSCLC and non-SQ NSCLC data were pooled, the median OS was 17.1 months (14.2-20.6), and the estimated 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 69.1% (59.6-76.8), 37.3% (28.3-46.2), and 28.1% (20.0-36.7), respectively. Twenty (76.9%) of 26 responders lived for 3 or more years. Nivolumab was well tolerated and no new safety signals were found., Conclusion: Treatment with nivolumab improved long-term survival and was well tolerated in patients with SQ and non-SQ NSCLC., Trial Registration: JapicCTI-132072; JapicCTI-132073., (© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard of care for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR mutations. However, almost all patients develop resistance after approximately 1 y of treatment, with >50% of cases due to the T790M secondary mutation of the EGFR gene. A large global Phase III study (AURA3) demonstrated that osimertinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) over platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with T790M-positive NSCLC who had progressed on previous EGFR-TKI therapy. However, it is not clear whether efficacy or safety of osimertinib in Japanese patients is similar to the overall population. We report a pre-planned subgroup analysis of pooled Phase II data from the AURA Extension and AURA2 trials to investigate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in Japanese patients. This study included 81 Japanese patients. Patients were administered 80 mg osimertinib orally once daily until disease progression. The main endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), PFS, and safety. The ORR was 63.6% and median PFS was 13.8 mo. Overall survival rate at 36 mo was 54.0%. The most common all-cause adverse events (AEs) were rash (grouped term; 65.4%), diarrhea (51.9%), paronychia (grouped term; 49.4%), and dry skin (grouped term; 39.5%). Most AEs were grade 1-2. Five patients (6.2%) developed interstitial lung disease, resulting in two deaths (2.5%). Osimertinib demonstrated favorable ORR and PFS in Japanese patients, similar to the overall population. Additionally, osimertinib has good efficacy and a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with NSCLC who had acquired resistance due to the T790M mutation., (© 2019 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Objectives: Tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with improved clinical benefit from immunotherapies targeting the PD-1 pathway. We conducted a global, multicenter, retrospective observational study to determine real-world prevalence of tumor PD-L1 expression in patients with NSCLC., Materials and Methods: Patients ≥18 years with histologically confirmed stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and a tumor tissue block (≤5 years old) obtained before treatment were identified in 45 centers across 18 countries. Tumor samples from eligible patients were selected consecutively, when possible. PD-L1 expression was evaluated at each center using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA)., Results: Of 2617 patients who met inclusion criteria, 2368 (90%) had PD-L1 data; 530 (22%) patients had PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50%, 1232 (52%) had PD-L1 TPS ≥ 1%, and 1136 (48%) had PD-L1 TPS < 1%. The most common reason for not having PD-L1 data (n = 249) was insufficient tumor cells (<100) on the slide (n = 170 [6%]). Percentages of patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and TPS ≥ 1%, respectively were: 22%/52% in Europe; 22%/53% in Asia Pacific; 21%/47% in the Americas, and 24%/55% in other countries. Prevalence of EGFR mutations (19%) and ALK alterations (3%) was consistent with prior reports from metastatic NSCLC studies. Among 1064 patients negative for both EGFR mutation and ALK alteration, the percentage with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and TPS ≥ 1%, respectively, were 27% and 53%., Conclusions: This is the largest real-world study in advanced NSCLC to date evaluating PD-L1 tumor expression using the 22C3 pharmDx kit. Testing failure rate was low with local evaluation of PD-L1 TPS across a large number of centers. Prevalence of PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% and TPS ≥ 1% among patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC was similar across geographic regions and broadly consistent with central testing results from clinical trial screening populations., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: We conducted a Phase I/II study of carboplatin, S-1 and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for elderly patients (71 years or older) with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Materials and Methods: Patients received carboplatin (AUC 3-5) on Day 1 and S-1 (30-40 mg/m2 two times daily) on Days 1-14, every 2 weeks, for up to four cycles, plus concurrent TRT at a total dose of 60 Gy. The primary endpoint for the Phase II study was the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate., Results: Eighteen patients were enrolled in the Phase I study. Febrile neutropenia, a decreased platelet count and esophagitis were dose-limiting toxicities. The recommended doses for the Phase II study were determined to be an AUC of 3 for carboplatin, 40 mg/m2 twice daily for S-1. Twenty-eight patients were evaluated in the Phase II study. The 1-year PFS rate was 57.1% (90% CI 41.6-71.4%), and the median PFS was 16.8 months (95% CI 7.8-not assessable [NA]). The lower limit of the 90% CI for 1-year PFS exceeded the prespecified threshold value of 30%; therefore, the primary endpoint was met. Grades 3-4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (21%) and hyponatremia (11%). Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis was observed in 18% of patients. No treatment-related deaths were observed., Conclusion: Combination chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin plus S-1 and concurrent TRT had a promising efficacy in elderly patients with locally advanced NSCLC; however, radiation pneumonitis was frequently observed., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: With the availability of several epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), sequential therapy could potentially render EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer a chronic disease in some patients. In this retrospective analysis of EGFR mutation-positive (Del19/L858R) patients receiving first-line afatinib in LUX-Lung 3, 6, and 7, we assessed uptake of, and outcomes following, subsequent therapies including the third-generation EGFR TKI, osimertinib., Methods: Post-progression therapy data were prospectively collected during follow-up. Molecular testing of tumours at progression/discontinuation of afatinib was not mandatory. Duration of subsequent therapies, and survival following osimertinib, were calculated with Kaplan-Meier estimates., Results: Among 553 patients who discontinued first-line afatinib, second-, third- and fourth-line therapy was administered in 394 (71%), 265 (48%), and 156 (28%) patients. The most common post-progression therapy was platinum-based chemotherapy (46%). Thirty-seven patients received subsequent osimertinib, 10 as second-line treatment. Median progression-free survival on afatinib in these 37 patients was 21.9 months. Median duration of osimertinib therapy was 20.2 months; median overall survival was not reached after a median follow-up of 4.7 years., Conclusions: Most patients treated with first-line afatinib received subsequent therapy. Although limited by sample size, enrichment, and a retrospective nature, data from patients who received sequential afatinib and osimertinib are encouraging, warranting further investigation., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that is selective for both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and T790M (threonine-to-methionine substitution at codon 790)-resistance mutations. The authors present long-term follow-up data from a preplanned, pooled analysis of phase 2 studies, the AZD9291 First Time in Patients Ascending Dose Study (AURA) extension trial (clincialtrials.gov identifier NCT01802632) and the AURA2 trial (NCT02094261)., Methods: Patients with centrally confirmed, T790M mutation-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer received osimertinib 80 mg once daily until disease progression or study discontinuation. Response was assessed by a blinded, independent, central review using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate., Results: In total, 411 patients received osimertinib (second line, 129 patients; third line or later, 282 patients). At the data cutoff date of November 1, 2016, the median treatment exposure was 16.4 months (range, 0-29.7 months), the objective response rate was 66% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61%-70%), the median response duration was 12.3 months (95% CI, 11.1-13.8 months), and the median progression-free survival was 9.9 months (95% CI, 9.5-12.3 months). At the data cutoff date of May 1, 2018, 271 patients (66%) had died, and 140 patients (34%) had discontinued before death. The median overall survival was 26.8 months (95% CI, 24.0-29.1 months); and the 12-month, 24-month, and 36-month survival rates were 80%, 55%, and 37%, respectively. Grade ≥3 possibly causally related (investigator assessed) adverse events were reported in 65 patients (16%), and the most common were rash (grouped terms; 42%; grade ≥3, 1%) and diarrhea (39%; <1%)., Conclusions: This pooled analysis represents the most mature clinical trial data for osimertinib in patients with pretreated, T790M-positive, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, further establishing osimertinib as a standard of care for this patient population., (© 2018 American Cancer Society.)

Objectives: In the LUX-Lung clinical trials of afatinib in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, tolerability-guided dose adjustment reduced the incidence and severity of adverse events while maintaining efficacy. The RealGiDo study evaluated the impact of afatinib dose adjustment in a real-world setting., Materials and Methods: This non-interventional, observational study used medical records of EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC patients treated with first-line afatinib. Primary outcomes were adverse drug reaction (ADR) incidence and severity, time to treatment failure (TTF), and time to progression (TTP), relative to LUX-Lung 3 (LL3)., Results: 228 patients were enrolled from 13 countries. Baseline characteristics were in line with LL3 but with more Del19 patients (78.1% vs. 49.0%) and fewer Asian patients (43.9% vs. 72.2%); 11.8% had ECOG performance status 2-3. A total of 71 (31.1%) received a modified starting dose of ≤30 mg. Of patients who started with 40 mg, 67.1% underwent dose reductions, 86.5% of which were in the first 6 months. Dose reductions were mainly due to ADRs and were more common in female, East Asian, and low body-weight patients. There were no new safety signals and fewer ≥grade 3 ADRs (28.4% vs. 48.9%) and serious adverse events (5.2% vs. 14.0%) than in LL3. Median TTF and TTP were 18.7 and 20.8 months, respectively, and were not impacted by reduced starting dose or dose modification., Conclusion: Real-world data show that afatinib dose adjustments reduced the frequency and intensity of ADRs without compromising effectiveness, highlighting the benefit of tailoring afatinib dose to optimise treatment outcomes and supporting clinical decision-making. The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02751879)., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1]) received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency for previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer based on OAK-a randomised, phase III trial that showed significantly improved survival with atezolizumab versus docetaxel regardless of PD-L1 expression. With longer follow-up, we summarised the characteristics of long-term survivors (LTSs)., Methods: In OAK (NCT02008227), patients were randomised 1:1 to receive atezolizumab or docetaxel until loss of clinical benefit or disease progression, respectively. Overall survival was evaluated after a 26-month minimum follow-up, including in patient subgroups defined by best overall response (BOR). LTSs were defined as patients who lived ≥24 months since randomisation. Non-LTSs died within 24 months, and patients censored before 24 months were excluded from the analysis. The baseline characteristics, including biomarkers, BOR, subsequent non-protocol therapy (NPT) and safety, are reported., Results: Survival benefit with atezolizumab was observed across all patient subgroups defined by BOR. More atezolizumab-treated patients were LTSs versus those treated with docetaxel (28% versus 18%). Most atezolizumab responders were LTSs (77%) versus only 48% of docetaxel responders. However, 21% of atezolizumab-arm LTSs had progressive disease (PD) as BOR, and more atezolizumab-arm LTSs than non-LTSs continued treatment post-PD. Fifty-two percent of docetaxel-arm LTSs received immunotherapy as subsequent NPT. Despite extended treatment duration in atezolizumab-arm LTSs (median, 18 months), atezolizumab was well tolerated., Conclusions: After >2 years of follow-up, atezolizumab continued to provide durable survival benefit versus docetaxel, with tolerable safety. Atezolizumab-arm LTSs were enriched for patients with high PD-L1 expression and included PD-L1-negative patients. Long-term survival was not limited to responders., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To develop an automated analytic module for calculation of tumor growth rate from serial CT scans and to apply the module and evaluate reproducibility in a pilot cohort of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors., Materials and Methods: The module utilized a commercially available image-processing workstation equipped with a validated tumor volume measurement tool. An automated analytic software module was programmed with the capability to record and display serial tumor volume changes and to calculate tumor volume growth rate over time and added to the workstation. The module was applied to evaluate the tumor growth rate in a pilot cohort of 24 EGFR-mutant patients treated with EGFR inhibitors, and reproducibility references as tested by two independent thoracic radiologists., Results: The module analyzed chest CT scans from 24 patients (5 males, 19 females; median age: 61) with a median of 8 scans per patient, totaling 227 scans and provided a graphical display with an automated and instant calculation of tumor growth rate after the nadir volume for each patient. High inter and intraobserver agreements were noted for tumor growth rates, with concordance correlation coefficients of 0.9323 and 0.9668, respectively. Interpretation of slow versus fast tumor growth using previously identified threshold of ≤0.15/month had a perfect interobserver agreement (κ = 1.00), and an excellent intraobserver agreement (κ = 0.895)., Conclusions: The present study describes the development of an image analytic module for assessing tumor growth rate and the data demonstrates the functionality and reproducibility of the module in a pilot cohort of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-TKI. The image analytic module is an initial step for clinical translation of the tumor growth rate approach to guide cancer treatment in precision oncology., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Pneumonitis related to the use of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibodies is a common immune-related adverse event that can be life-threatening. However, the relationship between pulmonary fibrosis/emphysema and the incidence of anti-PD-1-related pneumonitis is unclear., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 123 patients who were diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer and treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) at the Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Japan, between December 17, 2015, and November 30, 2017. Patients who previously received thoracic radiotherapy to the primary lesion, mediastinum, spinal, or rib metastases were excluded from the analysis. Fibrosis score (0-5) and emphysema score (0-4) on baseline chest computed tomography (CT) were determined by two diagnostic radiologists., Results: Eighteen patients (14.6%) experienced anti-PD-1-related pneumonitis, of which four (3.3%) were grade ≥3. The median onset time of pneumonitis after starting anti-PD-1 therapy was 60 days (range, 6-634 days). According to the analysis of fibrosis score, pneumonitis occurred in 13 (35.1%) of the 37 patients with a fibrosis score ≥1 and in 5 (5.8%) of 86 patients with a fibrosis score of 0. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that fibrosis score ≥1 was the only risk factor for anti-PD-1-related pneumonitis (p = 0.0008)., Conclusion: Our results indicate that pre-existing pulmonary fibrosis significantly increases the risk of anti-PD-1-related pneumonitis. Further studies are needed to identify predictive factors of anti-PD-1-related pneumonitis in patients with fibrotic changes on CT findings., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of osimertinib for elderly patients, since the data remain limited., Patients and Methods: A total of 77 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation and treated with osimertinib were reviewed. Efficacy and safety indicators, such as EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-related adverse events (AEs) and osimertinib-associated hematotoxicity, were evaluated in elderly patients (elderly group, EG; age, ≥75 years) by comparing them with younger patients (non-EG; aged <75 years). The frequency of AEs associated with osimertinib was compared with the initial EGFR-TKI treatment before osimertinib administration in the same patient cohort., Results: Of the total 77 patients, 18 (23%) were assigned to the EG, whereas 59 (77%) were assigned to the non-EG. There were no significant differences in overall response rate and progression-free survival between the two groups. Regarding the safety of osimertinib, the EG had significantly more grade ≥2 paronychia than the non-EG (16.6% vs. 1.6%, p=0.04). Additionally, the maximum grade of EGFR-TKI-related AEs associated with osimertinib in the EG was significantly lower than that of the initial EGFR-TKI treatment (p=0.03)., Conclusion: Osimertinib is a safe and effective treatment option for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC who harbor the EGFR mutation., (Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Clinical experience of ceritinib in patients who progressed on alectinib is limited. In this prospective phase II study, we evaluated the activity of ceritinib in alectinib-pretreated patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged metastatic (stage IIIB/IV) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. All patients were required to have ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST, 1.1, and a World Health Organization Performance Status (WHO PS) of 0-1. Prior crizotinib and/or up to 1 chemotherapy regimen was allowed. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. Ceritinib was given at a dose of 750 mg/day fasted. A total of 20 patients were enrolled from August 2015 to March 2017. All patients received prior alectinib (100%), 13 (65.0%) patients received prior platinum-based chemotherapy, and 4 (20%) patients received prior crizotinib. Median duration of exposure and the follow-up time with ceritinib were 3.7 months (range: 0.4-15.1) and 11.6 months (range: 4.8-23.0), respectively. Investigator-assessed ORR was 25% (95% CI: 8.7-49.1). Key secondary endpoints, all investigator assessed, included disease control rate (70.0%; 95% CI: 45.7-88.1), time to response (median, 1.8 months; range: 1.8-2.0), and duration of response (median, 6.3 months; 95% CI: 3.5-9.2). Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI: 1.9-5.3). The most common adverse events reported were diarrhea (85.0%), nausea (80.0%), and vomiting (65.0%). Based on our findings, ceritinib could be considered as one of the treatment options for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who progressed on alectinib. (Trial registration no. NCT02450903)., (© 2018 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations occur in approximately 50% of East Asian patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and confer sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). ASP8273 is an irreversible EGFR-TKI, given orally, that inhibits EGFR activating mutations and has shown clinical activity in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Epidermal growth factor receptor-TKI-naïve Japanese adult patients (≥20 years) with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations were enrolled in this open-label, single-arm, phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02500927). Patients received ASP8273 300 mg once daily until discontinuation criteria were met. The primary end-point was to determine the safety of ASP8273 300 mg; the secondary end-point was antitumor activity defined by RECIST version 1.1. Thirty-one patients (12 men and 19 women; median age, 64 years [range, 31-82 years]) with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC were enrolled; as of 23 February 2016, 25 patients (81%) were still on study. Of the 31 patients, 27 (87%) had an exon 19 deletion (n = 13, 42%) or an L858R (n = 14, 45%) EGFR activating mutation, and two (7%) had an L861Q mutation. Five patients (16%) had other EGFR activating mutations, two had an activating mutation and the T790M resistance mutation. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse event was diarrhea (n = 24, 77%). All patients had at least one post-baseline scan; one patient (3%) achieved a confirmed complete response, 13 (42%) had a confirmed partial response, and 15 (48%) had confirmed stable disease (disease control rate, 94% [n = 29/31]) per investigator assessment. Once-daily ASP8273 at 300 mg was generally well tolerated and showed antitumor activity in TKI-naïve Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC., (© 2018 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of atezolizumab versus the efficacy and safety of docetaxel as second- or third-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC in the primary (n = 850) and secondary (n = 1225) efficacy populations of the randomized phase III OAK study (respectively referred to as the intention-to-treat [ITT] 850 [ITT850] and ITT1225) at an updated data cutoff were assessed., Methods: Patients received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, or docetaxel, 75 mg/m 2 , intravenously every 3 weeks until loss of clinical benefit or disease progression, respectively. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) in the ITT population and programmed death-ligand 1-expressing subgroup. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of subsequent immunotherapy use in the docetaxel arm on the observed survival benefit with atezolizumab., Results: Atezolizumab demonstrated an OS benefit versus docetaxel in the updated ITT850 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.89, p = 0.0006) and the ITT1225 (HR = 0.80, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.92, p = 0.0012) after minimum follow-up times of 26 and 21 months, respectively. Improved survival with atezolizumab was observed across programmed death-ligand 1 and histological subgroups. In the immunotherapy sensitivity analysis, the relative OS benefit with atezolizumab was slightly greater in the ITT850 (HR = 0.69) and ITT1225 (HR = 0.74) than the conventional OS estimate. Fewer patients receiving atezolizumab experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (14.9%) than did patients receiving docetaxel (42.4%); no grade 5 adverse events related to atezolizumab were observed., Conclusions: The results of the updated ITT850 and initial ITT1225 analyses were consistent with those of the primary efficacy analysis demonstrating survival benefit with atezolizumab versus with docetaxel. Atezolizumab continued to demonstrate a favorable safety profile after longer treatment exposure and follow-up., (Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Atezolizumab, an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) agent, is effective and well tolerated in patients with pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed its efficacy and safety in Japanese patients through subgroup analyses of the phase 3 OAK study (NCT02008227)., Patients and Methods: Key eligibility criteria of this randomized, controlled, open-label, international study include locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC, ≥ 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy, age ≥ 18 years, measurable disease (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1. Atezolizumab 1200 mg or docetaxel 75 mg/m 2 was provided intravenously every 3 weeks. Co-primary end points were overall survival (OS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and those with ≥ 1% PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (TC) or tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC; TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3)., Results: Sixty-four ITT patients were Japanese; 19 had TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 status. In Japanese ITT patients, median OS in the atezolizumab arm (n = 36) was longer than the docetaxel arm (n = 28; 21.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.0-not estimable (NE)] versus 17.0 months [95% CI, 12.5-NE], respectively; hazard ratio 0.80 [95% CI, 0.41-1.57]). In the TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 population, median OS was 21.3 months (95% CI, 15.0-NE) and NE in the atezolizumab (n = 11) and docetaxel (n = 8) groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.22-3.05]). Atezolizumab was generally well tolerated, with no treatment-related deaths., Conclusion: Atezolizumab was effective and well tolerated in pretreated Japanese patients with NSCLC. Results are consistent with the primary analysis of OAK., (Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the first-line treatment for patients with EGFR mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, most patients become resistant to these drugs, so their disease progresses. Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI that can inhibit the kinase even when the common resistance-conferring Thr790Met (T790M) mutation is present, is a promising therapeutic option for patients whose disease has progressed after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment. AURA3 was a randomized (2:1), open-label, phase III study comparing the efficacy of osimertinib (80 mg/d) with platinum-based therapy plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m 2 ) in 419 patients with advanced NSCLC with the EGFR T790M mutation in whom disease had progressed after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment. This subanalysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of osimertinib specifically in 63 Japanese patients enrolled in AURA3. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS) based on investigator assessment. Improvement in PFS was clinically meaningful in the osimertinib group (n = 41) vs the platinum-pemetrexed group (n = 22; hazard ratio 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.56). The median PFS was 12.5 and 4.3 months in the osimertinib and platinum-pemetrexed groups, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events determined to be related to treatment occurred in 5 patients (12.2%) treated with osimertinib and 12 patients (54.5%) treated with platinum-pemetrexed. The safety and efficacy results in this subanalysis are consistent with the results of the overall AURA3 study, and support the use of osimertinib in Japanese patients with EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC whose disease has progressed following first-line EGFR-TKI treatment. (ClinicalTrials.gov trial registration no. NCT02151981.)., (© 2018 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Background: The combination use of the vascular disrupting agent ombrabulin with chemotherapeutic agents was previously shown to be highly synergistic in preclinical models., Methods: In this dose-escalation study of ombrabulin (15.5-35 mg/m2) in combination with docetaxel (60 or 75 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2), agents were administered 24 h apart every 3 weeks to Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. The study was designed and conducted in a 3 + 3 manner. Safety, tumor response and pharmacokinetics were evaluated., Results: Eleven patients with non small cell lung cancer as the primary tumor were treated. Two patients out of five had dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) in Cycle 1 at the starting doses of ombrabulin 15.5 mg/m2, docetaxel 60 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2. Thus, dose escalation was terminated. The first dose level was re-evaluated in six patients who received prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). However, because of the occurrence of DLTs in Cycle 1 in two patients out of six, the study was led to the premature termination without pursued upper dose level. Partial response was observed in four patients out of 11. Pharmacokinetic parameters of ombrabulin and cisplatin were not altered in this combination treatment, while docetaxel clearance decreased by ~40% compared to that observed with docetaxel monotherapy at the same dose (60 mg/m2)., Conclusion: A combination regimen of ombrabulin with cisplatin and docetaxel was not feasible for Japanese patients owing to the occurrence of hematological and non-hematological DLTs at the initial dose level., Clinical Trial Registration Id: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01095302.

Background: In the global, Phase 3, ASCEND-5 study, ceritinib improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs chemotherapy in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had previously progressed on crizotinib and platinum-based chemotherapy. Here, we report efficacy and safety in a subset of Japanese patients from the ASCEND-5 study., Methods: Patients with advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC received oral ceritinib 750 mg/day or chemotherapy (intravenous pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 [investigator's choice], every 21 days)., Results: Among the 231 patients, 29 were Japanese, of which, 11 were treated with ceritinib and 18 were treated with chemotherapy (5 with pemetrexed and 13 with docetaxel). All the patients received prior crizotinib and one or two lines of prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. Median follow-up time was 16.6 months for ceritinib arm and 16.4 months for chemotherapy arm in the overall population. The median PFS by blinded independent review committee was 9.8 months (95% CI, 4.3-14.0) in ceritinib arm vs 1.6 months (95% CI, 1.4-3.0) in chemotherapy arm. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events, suspected to be study drug related, were reported in 36.4% of ceritinib arm and 72.2% of chemotherapy arm, respectively. No Grade 3 or 4 events of diarrhea, nausea and vomiting were reported in both the treatment arms. Adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation were reported in one patient in each arm: Grade 3 central-nervous system metastases in ceritinib-treated patient and Grade 3 febrile neutropenia in chemotherapy-treated patient., Conclusions: Consistent with overall population, ceritinib demonstrated better efficacy compared with the standard second-line chemotherapy in Japanese patients with crizotinib-resistant ALK+ NSCLC., Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01828112.

The advent of anaplastic lymphoma kinase(ALK)inhibitors has revolutionized treatment of ALK fusion gene-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Nevertheless, it has become clear that cases refractory and resistant to ALK inhibitors occur at a certain incidence, and how to treat such cases is a current issue. Following crizotinib and alectinib, ceritinib(Zykadia® capsules)is the third ALK inhibitor approved in Japan, and it is expected to be useful for patients who have developed crizotinib resistance. However, ceritinib has been pointed out to have a high incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events that impact patients' quality of life. Accordingly, in this paper, we report the clinical results and incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions with ceritinib in treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC patients. We also present management methods of the adverse events.

Programmed cell death (PD)-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as promising options for the treatment of multiple cancer types. Nivolumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody, which inhibits the PD-1 receptor and has been approved in the United States, Europe, and Asia for the treatment of advanced NSCLC. This review focuses on nivolumab's efficacy and safety in the treatment of NSCLC patients in Japan.

Purpose This phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study determined whether motesanib improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin (P/C) in East Asian patients with stage IV/recurrent nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral motesanib 125 mg or placebo once daily plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m 2 IV and carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 6 mg/mL ⋅ min IV for up to six 3-week cycles. Random assignment was stratified by epidermal growth factor receptor status, region, and weight loss in the 6 months before assignment. The primary end point was PFS, the key secondary end point was overall survival, and other secondary end points were objective response rate, time to tumor response, duration of response, and adverse events (AEs). Results Four hundred one patients were assigned to receive motesanib plus P/C (n = 197) or placebo plus P/C (n = 204). Median PFS was 6.1 v 5.6 months for motesanib versus placebo (stratified log-rank test P = .0825; stratified hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.03; P = .0820); median overall survival was not reached versus 21.6 months ( P = .5514). In secondary analyses, the objective response rate was 60.1% v 41.6% ( P < .001); median time to tumor response, 1.4 v 1.6 months, and median duration of response, 5.3 v 4.1 months. Incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs (86.7% v 67.6%) and AEs that led to drug discontinuation (32.7% v 14.2%) were higher with motesanib than with placebo. AEs reported more frequently with motesanib were GI disorders, hypertension, and gallbladder related. Conclusion Motesanib plus P/C did not significantly improve PFS versus placebo plus P/C in East Asian patients with stage IV/recurrent nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Several second-generation inhibitors of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) have demonstrated potent activity in ALK rearrangement-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two of these agents, ceritinib, and alectinib, recently received approval for the treatment of ALK-rearranged NSCLC in Japan. The efficacy of treatment with a second-generation ALK inhibitor after failure with a different second-generation ALK inhibitor remains unclear. We present a series of eight patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC treated with alectinib who experienced disease progression after ceritinib. Both crizotinib and ceritinib were administered to six patients, with four (29%) patients receiving crizotinib followed by ceritinib. Among the eight study patients, two (25%) had partial response, one (12%) stable disease, and five (63%) had progressive disease. The median progression-free survival was 3.6 months (95% confidence interval=0-7.1 months). The results of this study suggest that the second-generation ALK inhibitor alectinib has limited efficacy after initial treatment with the second-generation ALK inhibitor ceritinib., (Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background: Emergence of the T790M point mutation in exon 20 of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is the most common mechanism of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). The aim of this study was to investigate the association between T790M mutation status and the progression patterns during EGFR-TKI treatment., Methods: We reviewed 181 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation, who were evaluated for T790M mutation status after initial EGFR-TKI failure (gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib). We retrospectively investigated the patient characteristics, initial EGFR-TKI response, T790M mutation status, subsequent treatment after initial EGFR-TKIs, timing of re-biopsy, and progression patterns during the EGFR-TKI treatment., Results: After the resistance to the EGFR-TKIs, the T790M mutation was identified in 87 (48%) of 181 patients. Seventy-three (40%) patients had solitary lesion progression, and 108 (60%) had multiple lesion progression during the initial EGFR-TKI treatment. The prevalence of the T790M mutation was significantly greater in patients with solitary lesion progression than those with multiple lesion progression (58% vs. 24%; P < .0001). The overall response rate and progression-free survival on initial EGFR-TKIs were significantly better in patients who acquired T790M after failure of EGFR-TKIs than those without T790M (overall response rate, 80% vs. 60%; P = .0033 and progression-free survival, 11.4 vs. 9.3 months; P = .0050). The multivariate analysis showed that gender, initial EGFR-TKI response, and progression patterns were significantly associated with T790M mutation status., Discussion: The progression patterns during initial EGFR-TKIs and initial EGFR-TKI response are associated with the T790M mutation., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Emergence of the T790M point mutation in exon 20 of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is the most common mechanism of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). It remains unclear whether the efficacy of platinum-doublet chemotherapy is impacted by the presence of the T790M mutation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of platinum-doublet chemotherapy after initial EGFR-TKI failure according to the EGFR T790M in patients with advanced EGFR-mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)., Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 50 patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who underwent rebiopsy to evaluate their T790M mutation status after development of resistance to first-line EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib) and were subsequently treated with second-line platinum-based chemotherapy., Results: The median age of patients was 63 years (range, 35-77 years), and 15 (30%) patients were male. Histological examination revealed that all patients had adenocarcinoma, 39 (78%) had stage IV disease, and 11 (22%) patients had postoperative recurrence. Of all, 17 patients (34%) had the T790M mutation by rebiopsy after initial EGFR-TKI failure. The overall response rate (ORR) of platinum-doublet chemotherapy was 24% for both T790M-positive and T790M-negative patients. There was no significant difference in the progression-free survival (PFS) in T790M-positive and T790M-negative patients (median PFS, 6.0 months vs. 5.1 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1-11.9 vs. 4.4-5.8; hazard ratio [HR], 0.90 [95%CI, 0.49-1.66]; P=0.7210). None of the factors were predictive of platinum-doublet chemotherapy efficacy by the multivariate analysis., Conclusion: There were no differences in clinical outcomes of platinum-based chemotherapy according to the T790M status of NSCLC patients., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)