Search

Resumen Introduccion y objetivos El acceso transaxilar (ATx) se ha convertido en el acceso alternativo al transfemoral (ATF), mas utilizado en pacientes sometidos a implante percutaneo de valvula aortica (TAVI). El objetivo principal de este estudio es comparar la mortalidad total hospitalaria y a los 30 dias de los pacientes incluidos en el registro espanol de TAVI a los que se trato por acceso ATx frente a ATF. Metodos Se analizo a todos los pacientes incluidos en el registro espanol de TAVI tratados por ATx o ATF. Los eventos hospitalarios y a los 30 dias de seguimiento se definieron segun las recomendaciones de la Valve Academic Research Consortium. Se evaluo el impacto de la via de acceso mediante emparejamiento por puntuacion de propension segun las caracteristicas clinicas y ecograficas. Resultados Se incluyo a 6.603 pacientes, 191 (2,9%) tratados por ATx y 6.412 con ATF. Despues del ajuste (grupo de ATx, n = 113; grupo de ATF, n = 3.035), el exito del dispositivo fue similar entre ambos grupos (el 94% en el grupo de ATx frente al 95% en el de ATF; p = 0,95); sin embargo, se observo un incremento en la tasa de infarto agudo de miocardio (OR = 5,3; IC95%, 2,0-13,8; p = 0,001), complicaciones renales (OR = 2,3; IC95%, 1,3-4,1; p = 0,003) e implante de marcapasos (OR = 1,6; IC95%, 1,01-2,6; p = 0,03) en el grupo de ATx comparado con el de ATF. De mismo modo, la mortalidad hospitalaria y a los 30 dias fueron superiores en el grupo de ATx (respectivamente, OR = 2,2; IC95%, 1,04-4,6; p = 0,039; y OR = 2,3; IC95%, 1,2-4,5; p = 0,01). Conclusiones El ATx se asocia con un aumento en la mortalidad total tanto hospitalaria como a los 30 dias frente al ATF. Ante estos resultados, el ATx debe considerarse solo en caso de que el ATF no sea posible.

Background During COVID-19 pandemic, elective invasive cardiac procedures (ICP) have been frequently cancelled or postponed. Consequences may be more evident in patients with diabetes. Objectives The objective was to identify the peculiarities of patients with DM among those in whom ICP were cancelled or postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to identify subgroups in which the influence of DM has higher impact on the clinical outcome. Methods We included 2,158 patients in whom an elective ICP was cancelled or postponed during COVID-19 pandemic in 37 hospitals in Spain. Among them, 700 (32.4%) were diabetics. Patients with and without diabetes were compared. Results Patients with diabetes were older and had a higher prevalence of other cardiovascular risk factors, previous cardiovascular history and co-morbidities. Diabetics had a higher mortality (3.0% vs. 1.0%; p = 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (1.9% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.001). Differences were especially important in patients with valvular heart disease (mortality 6.9% vs 1.7% [p Conclusion Among patients in whom an elective invasive cardiac procedure is cancelled or postponed during COVID-19 pandemic, mortality and cardiovascular mortality is higher in patients with diabetes, irrespectively on other clinical conditions. These procedures should not be cancelled in patients with diabetes.

BACKGROUND: During COVID-19 pandemic in Spain, elective procedures were canceled or postponed, mainly due to health care systems overwhelming. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the consequences of interrupting invasive procedures in patients with chronic cardiac diseases due to the COVID-19 outbreak in Spain. METHODS: The study population is comprised of 2,158 patients that were pending on elective cardiac invasive procedures in 37 hospitals in Spain on the 14th of March 2020, when a state of alarm and subsequent lockdown was declared in Spain due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These patients were followed-up until April 31th. RESULTS: Out of the 2,158 patients, 36 (1.7%) died. Mortality was significantly higher in patients pending on structural procedures (4.5% vs. 0.8%, respectively; p < .001), in those >80 year-old (5.1% vs. 0.7%, p < .001), and in presence of diabetes (2.7% vs. 0.9%, p = .001), hypertension (2.0% vs. 0.6%, p = .014), hypercholesterolemia (2.0% vs. 0.9%, p = .026) [Correction added on December 23, 2020, after first online publication: as per Dr. Moreno's request changes in p-values were made after original publication in Abstract.], chronic renal failure (6.0% vs. 1.2%, p < .001), NYHA > II (3.8% vs. 1.2%, p = .001), and CCS > II (4.2% vs. 1.4%, p = .013), whereas was it was significantly lower in smokers (0.5% vs. 1.9%, p = .013). Multivariable analysis identified age > 80, diabetes, renal failure and CCS > II as independent predictors for mortality. CONCLUSION: Mortality at 45 days during COVID-19 outbreak in patients with chronic cardiovascular diseases included in a waiting list due to cancellation of invasive elective procedures was 1.7%. Some clinical characteristics may be of help in patient selection for being promptly treated when similar situations happen in the future.

Transaxillary access (TAx) has emerged as a less invasive alternative access when transfemoral access (TF) is not possible in patients undergoing TAVI. The primary endpoint of this study was to compare total in-hospital and 30-day mortality of patients included in the Spanish TAVI registry that were treated by TAx versus TF access. Methods All patients included in the Spanish TAVI registry who were treated by TAx or TF access were analyzed. In-hospital and 30-days outcomes were assessed using the Valve Academic Research Consortium definitions. An analyses by propensity score matching and multilevel logistic regression was performed for comparing both groups. Results A total of 6603 patients were included, of whom 191 (2.9%) were treated by TAx and 6412 were treated with TF access. After the adjustment, the device success was similar between both groups (94%, TAx vs 95%, TF p=0.95) as well as the rate of vascular complications (11.9% Tax vs 11.9 TF; p=0.78), bleeding (7.7% TAx vs. 7.9% TF; p=0.62) and stroke (4.2% TAx vs. 2.0 TF; p=0.09). However, in-hospital and 30-day mortality was significantly higher in TAx access group versus TF 2.19 (1.13–4.26): p=0.02 and 2.11 (1.08–4, 13); P=0.02, respectively. Similarly, the rate of acute myocardial infarction 5.05 (1.94–13.1); p=0.001, renal complications 2.07 (1.19–3.60; p =) 0.01 and pacemaker implantation 1.56 (1.01–2.40); p=0.04 was higher in the TAx group versus TF. Conclusions Transaxillary access compared to transfemoral access is associated with an increase in total in-hospital and 30-day mortality, as a result TAx access should be considered only in those cases in which TF is not possible Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

The Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency sent a warning in 2010 discouraging the concomitant use of clopidogrel with omeprazole or esomeprazole. The purpose is to know the gastroprotective approach in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the level of follow-up of the alert. In 17 hospitals with catheterization laboratory in Spain, 1 per region, we studied 25 consecutive patients per hospital whose diagnosis of discharge since October 1, 2013, had been any type of ACS. We analyzed their baseline clinical profile, the gatroprotective agents at admission and discharge and the antiplatelet therapy at discharge. The number of patients included was 425: age 67.2 ± 12.5 years, women 29.8%, diabetes 36.5%. The patients presented unstable angina in 21.6%, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in 35.3% and ST-elevation myocardial infarction in 43.1%. Conservative approach was chosen in 17.9%, bare-metal stents 32.2%, ≥ 1 drug-eluting stent 48.5%, and surgery 1.4%. Aspirin was indicated in 1.9%, aspirin + clopidogrel 73.6%, aspirin + prasugrel 17.6%, and aspririn + ticagrelor 6.8%. Gastroprotective agents were present in 40.2% patients at admission and this percentage increased to 93.7% at discharge. Of the 313 (73.6%) on clopidogrel in 96 (30.6%) was combined with omeprazole and 3 (0.95%) with esomeprazole, whereas the most commonly used was pantoprazole with 190 patients (44.7%). In conclusion, almost the totality of the patients with an ACS receive gastroprotective agents at the moment of discharge, most of them with proton-pump inhibitors. In one every 3 cases of the patients who are on clopidogrel, the recommendation of the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency is not followed.

Percutaneous intervention of a coronary graft is the treatment of choice when the graft fails. The objective is to report the long-term results of drug-eluting stents (DES) in mammary artery grafts (MAG). Patients who had been treated with DES for MAG in 27 centers were selected. The baseline and procedural clinical data were included prospectively, and the follow-up was performed with the patients, families, and medical records. Two hundred and sixty-eight patients were included: age 65.5 ± 10.1 years, diabetes 47.8%, ejection fraction 55.5 ± 14.9%. Indication: stable angina 28.4%, unstable angina 38.1%, non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction 21.6%, ST-elevation myocardial infarction 5.3%, and heart failure 6.7%; 1.19 ± 0.59 stents/patient were implanted measuring 18.8 ± 8.8 mm in length and 2.68 ± 0.35 mm in diameter. Rapamycin was used in 78 cases (29.1%), paclitaxel in 77 (28.7%), everolimus in 70 (26.1%), zotarolimus in 34 (12.7%), and biolimus in 9 (3.4%). All cases were successful except for 1 in which the patient died 30 minutes after the procedure. There were no other inhospital events. After a follow-up of 41 months (Q 25 : 23.7 to Q 75 : 57.8), 24 patients (9%) died of heart-related causes and 20 (7.5%) of noncardiac causes. Repeat revascularization was necessary in 31 cases, and in 1 additional patient, there was total occlusion, which was not treated. These 32 patients represented 11.9% of the total. In conclusion, the implantation of DES in MAG shows very high procedural success and also low long-term event rates.

146 Presentamos el caso de una mujer de 73 anos con antecedentes de diabetes insulinodependiente, diagnosticada de estenosis aortica de leve a moderada y cardiopatia isquemica (angina de esfuerzo), a la que dos anos antes se implanto marcapasos ventricular por BAV completo. Tras la implantacion su grado funcional empeoro, refiriendo cansancio y disnea, asi como inestabilidad. El ecocardiograma revelo un ventriculo izquierdo hipertrofico (grosor de pared de 13 mm) con fraccion de eyeccion conservada y una estenosis aortica severa (gradiente maximo 77, medio 50). Se realizo estudio hemodinamico que objetivo la presencia de una lesion critica en la porcion media de la arteria coronaria descendente anterior y una estenosis moderada de la porcion descendente de la arteria coronaria derecha, asi como una estenosis aortica moderada-severa, con un gradiente medio de 39 mmHg y «pico-pico» de 40 mmHg (area valvular de 0,76 cm2). La curva de presion aortica (fig. 1) objetiva una gran variacion en la presion sistolica (de hasta 50 mmHg) en funcion de la sincronia AV. Como se observa, en las fases en que la onda P precede al complejo QRS, la presion aortica es mayor (sincronia AV adecuada), mientras que en las fases en que la P y el QRS coinciden, la presion cae (sincronia AV inadecuada). Se advierte, pues, la importancia de la contraccion auricular en el llenado ventricular en una paciente con disfuncion diastolica relacionada con su cardiopatia de base, que desarrollo sindrome de marcapasos tras la implantacion de un marcapasos no fisiologico. IM A G E N E S E N CA R D I O L O G I A