Search

Background: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) has been linked to an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, data are sparse regarding the role of IHD in AF recurrence after catheter ablation., Objective: We sought to investigate whether preexisting or new-onset IHD is associated with a greater risk of AF recurrence after ablation., Methods: With use of Danish nationwide registries, all patients undergoing first-time AF ablation in Denmark from 2010 to 2020 were identified. The primary outcome was AF recurrence defined by AF-related hospital admission or antiarrhythmic drug use within 1 year after ablation excluding a 3-month blanking period. IHD was defined as an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnosis of IHD or prior coronary revascularization., Results: Of 12,162 patients undergoing first-time ablation for AF (mean age, 62 years; 30% female), 20% had preexisting IHD. Preexisting IHD was associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence in univariable log-binomial logistic regression (relative risk, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.14; P < .001). However, after multivariable adjustment including procedural year, preexisting IHD was no longer associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence (relative risk, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.97-1.06; P = .42). In a nested case-control study of those without preexisting IHD before ablation (n = 9778), newly diagnosed IHD after ablation was associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.84-4.99; P < .001)., Conclusion: The presence of IHD does not appear to reduce the effectiveness of AF ablation procedures. However, the emergence of IHD after AF ablation may serve as a trigger for AF that is insufficiently suppressed by prior ablation., Competing Interests: Disclosures T.B.-S.: steering committee member of the Amgen-financed GALACTIC-HF trial; steering committee member of the Boehringer Ingelheim–financed SHARP3 trial; chief investigator of the Boston Scientific–financed DANLOGIC-HF trial; chief investigator of the Sanofi Pasteur–financed NUDGE-FLU trial; chief investigator of the Sanofi Pasteur–financed DANFLU-1 trial; chief investigator of the Sanofi Pasteur–financed DANFLU-2 trial; steering committee member of LUX-Dx TRENDS Evaluates Diagnostics Sensors in Heart Failure Patients Receiving Boston Scientific's Investigational ICM System trial; advisory board: Sanofi Pasteur, Amgen, CSL Seqirus, and GSK; speaker honorarium: Bayer, Novartis, Sanofi Pasteur, GE Healthcare, and GSK; research grants: Boston Scientific, GE Healthcare, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi Pasteur; consultant appointments: Novo Nordisk, IQVIA, and Parexel. All other authors report that they have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The elderly population with atrial fibrillation (AF) is growing. There is limited evidence to suggest AF ablation as an effective treatment for the elderly., Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the temporal trends of first-time ablations in the elderly, the impact of age on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and a composite endpoint of AF-related hospitalizations, repeat AF ablation, or use of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs)., Methods: Utilizing the Danish administrative registers, we incorporated individuals undergoing their first-time AF ablation from 2001 to 2020. Our cohort was divided into 3 age groups (<60, 60-74, and ≥75 years) and scrutinized across 4 consecutive 5-year intervals. Cox proportional-hazard multivariable analyses and cumulative incidences were used to evaluate the endpoints of 5-year MACE incidence and a 1-year composite endpoint of AF-related hospitalizations, repeat AF ablation, or use of antiarrhythmic drugs., Results: Elderly patients who underwent AF ablation increased significantly, from none in 2001 to 9% in 2020. The 5-year incidence of MACE in the elderly decreased from 61.9% (95% CI: 41.1%-82.7%) to 38.1% (95% CI: 31.9%-44.2%). The HR for age ≥75 years in the last time period was 1.52 (95% CI: 1.26-1.83). The 1-year composite outcome varied from 35.6% to 52.0%; age was not a consistent predictor., Conclusions: AF ablation use in the elderly has significantly increased over time. A notable decrease in MACE was evident across all age cohorts, with a particularly pronounced trend observed among the elderly population. Age was not an independent predictor of the composite endpoint., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The role of catheter ablation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) demonstrates a favorable clinical profile, however, data on elderly patients are lacking., Aims: We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of PFA in the elderly, using data from the EU-PORIA registry., Methods: Periprocedural complications and long-term safety and efficacy outcomes of AF ablation using the pentaspline PFA catheter (Farapulse™) were compared between patients older than 80 years old and their younger counterparts, across seven European centers., Results: Among the 1233 patients in the registry, 88 (7.1 %) were older than 80 years. Elderly patients were more often females (51.1 % vs 37.8 %, p = 0.01) with a lower median BMI (26.0, IQR:23.5-29.2 vs 26.9, IQR:24.4-30.4 kg/m 2 , p = 0.02), a higher median CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score (4, IQR:3-5 vs 2, IQR:1-3, p < 0.001) and a higher incidence of hypertension (73.9 % vs 52.7 %, p < 0.001). In both groups, most patients had paroxysmal AF (58.0 % vs 60.3 %, p = 0.65). Ablation in the elderly was more frequently performed with minimally interrupted anticoagulation (87.5 % vs 59.7 %, p < 0.001). Despite comparable rates of overall complications (5.7 % vs 3.5 %, p = 0.29), elderly patients had a higher incidence of stroke (2.3 % vs 0.3 %, p = 0.04). At 12 months, major adverse clinical events (4.5 % vs. 2.1 %, p = 0.12) and arrhythmia-free survival (70 % vs 74 %, p = 0.69) were comparable in both groups. None of the recurrence-free elderly patients were on antiarrhythmic drugs at the end of follow-up., Conclusion: In this real-world cohort, the efficacy of PFA for AF was similar in elderly and younger patients. Despite comparable complication rates, a higher incidence of stroke was observed in the elderly., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest R.M.: none. V.S.: none. B.S. is a consultant for and has received honoraria as well as research funding from Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Biosense Webster. S.B. has received honoraria from Medtronic and Biosense Webster. K.R.J.C. is a consultant for and has received honoraria as well as research funding from Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Biosense Webster. T.R. has received research grants from the Goldschmidt-Jacobson Foundation, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, and the sitem insel support fund, all for work outside the submitted study. He has received speaker/consulting honoraria or travel support from Abbott/SJM, Bayer, Biosense-Webster, Biotronik, Boston-Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Farapulse, Medtronic, and Pfizer-BMS, all for work outside the submitted study. He has received support for his institution's fellowship program from Abbott/SJM, Biosense-Webster, Biotronik, Boston-Scientific, and Medtronic for work outside the submitted study. T.K.: none. K.N. is a consultant for Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Field Medical, and LifeTech Scientific. N.R.: consultant for Boston Scientific. J.H.: speakers fees from Boston Scientific and Biosense Webster. M.H.R.: none. P.v.d.V.: none. Y.B. has received research grants from Medtronic and Atricure. He has received speaker/consulting honoraria from Abbott/SJM and Boston-Scientific, all for work outside the submitted study. S.J.: none. B.A.M.: none. S.B. is consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Microport, and Zoll., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recent studies have demonstrated the benefit of early ablation in preventing the progression of atrial fibrillation (AF). Clinical practice has reflected this shift in AF management and no longer requires patients to fail antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) before receiving ablation. However, there is limited evidence on outcomes with pulsed field ablation (PFA) as a first-line therapy. Examination of real-world data may shed light on clinical practices and the effectiveness of PFA with and without a prior history of AAD usage., Methods: European Real World Outcomes with Pulsed Field Ablation is an all-comer AF registry enrolling consecutive patients treated with the pentaspline PFA catheter at 7 high-volume centers in Europe. This subanalysis evaluates patients with a history of class I/III AAD use versus those with no documented history of class I/III AAD use (first-line patients). Patients with incomplete AAD history, long-standing persistent AF, and those undergoing a repeat ablation procedure were excluded. Patients were treated and followed based on institutional standard of care. Any episode of atrial tachycardia or AF lasting longer than 30 s was considered an arrhythmia recurrence., Results: Of 1233 patients enrolled in European real world outcomes with pulsed field ablation, 1091 met the inclusion criteria (mean age, 66 years; 40% females; and persistent AF, 36%). Pulmonary vein isolation-only was used in 90% of the patients, and 10% received extra-PV ablation. Ablation as the first-line approach was chosen in 589 patients, and 502 patients had prior class I/III AAD use. In the first-line PFA group, paroxysmal AF was more frequent (68% versus 59%; P <0.001), and pulmonary vein isolation-only was more frequent (93% versus 86%; P <0.001). At 1-year follow-up, freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence was similar in the ablation-first versus the ablation after failed AAD group (78% versus 74%, respectively; P =0.076)., Conclusion: In this large real-world PFA registry, freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence after 1 year was similar in patients undergoing PFA as a first-line treatment and those with prior failed AAD therapy., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05823818., Competing Interests: Dr Schmidt is a consultant for and received honoraria and research funding from Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Biosense Webster. Dr Bordignon received honoraria from Medtronic and Biosense Webster. Dr Chun is a consultant for and received honoraria and research funding from Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Biosense Webster. Dr Bordignon is a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Microport, and Zoll. Dr Reichlin received research grants from the Goldschmidt-Jacobson Foundation, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, and the sitem-insel support fund, all for work outside the submitted study. He received speaker/consulting honoraria or travel support from Abbott/SJM, Bayer, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Farapulse, Medtronic, and Pfizer BMS, all for work outside the submitted study. He received support for his institution’s fellowship program from Abbott/SJM, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic for work outside the submitted study. Dr Roten received research grants from Medtronic and speaker/consulting honoraria from Abbott and Medtronic. Dr Neven is a consultant for Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Field Medical, and LifeTech Scientific. Dr Füting received an educational grant from Boston Scientific. Dr Reinsch is a consultant for Boston Scientific. Dr Hansen received speaker fees from Boston Scientific and Biosense Webster. Dr Blaauw received research grants from Medtronic and AtriCure. He received speaker/consulting honoraria from Abbott/SJM and Boston Scientific, all for work outside the submitted study. Drs Albrecht and Raybuck and Dr Sutton are salaried employees of Boston Scientific. The other authors report no conflicts.

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia associated with reduced quality of life that can lead to serious complications such as stroke and heart failure. Ablation is a safe and effective treatment for AF but is not offered equally to all patients. The aim of this study is to identify demographic groups more or less likely to undergo AF ablation., Methods and Results: All patients with newly diagnosed AF between 2010 and 2018 were identified in the Danish nationwide registries. The association between gender, age, level of education and attachment to the job market, and the likelihood of receiving AF ablation was investigated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis. Cumulative incidence was calculated using the Aalen-Johansen estimator. A total of 176 248 patients were included. Men were more likely to receive ablation than women (7% vs. 3%). Patients aged 25-44 and 45-64 were most likely to receive ablation, while only 0.7% of patients aged 80 or above received ablation. The rate of ablation significantly decreased with decreasing level of education. Full-time employed patients were most likely to receive ablation, followed by self-employed, unemployed, on sick leave, undergoing education, and early retired patients. Retired patients were the least likely to receive ablation (3%)., Conclusion: This study found that women, older patients, patients with lower levels of education, and patients on social benefits are less likely to receive AF ablation. These findings suggest that there are significant social and economic disparities in AF ablation treatment in Denmark., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: none declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established treatment option for atrial fibrillation (AF), where sedation and analgesia are pivotal for patient comfort and lesion formation. The impact of anaesthesia type on AF recurrence rates remains uncertain. This study aimed to examine AF recurrence rates depending on conscious sedation (CS) vs. general anaesthesia (GA) during CA., Methods and Results: Utilizing nationwide data from the Danish healthcare registries, we conducted this cohort study involving adults (≥18 years) undergoing first-time CA for AF between 2010 and 2018. Patients were categorized by anaesthesia type (CS or GA), with the primary endpoint being AF recurrence, defined by a composite endpoint of either antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) prescriptions, AF-related hospital admissions, electrical cardioversions, or AF re-ablation. The impact of anaesthesia type was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis. The study cohort comprised 7957 (6421 CS and 1536 GA) patients. Persistent AF, hypertension, and heart failure, as well as use of AAD, were more prevalent in the GA group. Cumulative incidences of recurrent AF were higher in the CS group at 1 (46% vs. 37%) and at 5 (68% vs. 63%) years. Multivariate analysis revealed CS as significantly associated with increased risk of AF recurrence at 5-year follow-up [hazard ratio 1.26 (95% confidence interval 1.15-1.38)], consistent across paroxysmal and persistent AF subtypes., Conclusion: This nationwide cohort study suggests a higher risk of AF recurrence with CS during CA compared to GA. These results advocate for considering GA as the preferred anaesthesia type for improved CA outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: L.D.R.-V., J.T., C.R.Z., C.M., R.H., A.J., R.H.W., G.G.: none. M.H.R.: Speaker honoraria from Boston Scientific and CardioFocus. J.H.: Speaker fees and consultant honoraria from Boston Scientific and Biosense Webster. M.L.H.: Received research grants from Biosense Webster and Medtronic., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background and Aims: Trends in patient selection and use of pharmacotherapy prior to catheter ablation (CA) for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) are not well described. This study examined temporal trends in patients undergoing first-time CA for regular SVT, including atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT), accessory pathways (APs), and ectopic atrial tachycardia (EAT) on a nationwide scale in Denmark in the period 2001-2018., Methods and Results: Using Danish Nationwide registers, 9959 patients treated with first-time CA for SVT between 2001 and 2018 were identified, of which 6023 (61%) received CA for AVNRT, 2829 (28%) for AP, and 1107 (11%) for EAT. Median age was 55, 42, and 55 in the AVNRT, APs, and EAT group, respectively. The number of patients receiving CA increased from 1195 between 2001 and 2003 to 1914 between 2016 and 2018. The percentage of patients with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≥ 2 increased in all patient groups. The number of patients who underwent CA with no prior use of antiarrhythmic- or rate limiting medicine increased significantly, though prior use of beta-blockers increased for AVNRT patients. Use of verapamil decreased in all three SVT groups (P < 0.05). Use of amiodarone and class 1C antiarrhythmics remained low, with the highest usage among EAT patients., Conclusion: Between 2001 and 2018, CA was increasingly performed in patients with SVT, primarily AVNRT- and EAT patients. The burden of comorbidities increased. Patients undergoing CA without prior antiarrhythmic- or rate-limiting drug therapy increased significantly. Use of beta-blockers increased and remained the most widely used drug., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Guidelines recommend prioritizing treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs before referral of patients with atrial fibrillation to ablation, delaying a potential subsequent ablation. However, delaying ablation may affect ablation outcomes. We sought to investigate the impact of duration from diagnosis to ablation on the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence and adverse events., Methods and Results: Using Danish nationwide registries, all patients with first-time ablation for atrial fibrillation were identified and included from 2010 to 2018. Patients were divided into 4 groups by diagnosis-to-ablation time: <1.0 year (early ablation), 1.0 to 1.9 years, 2.0 to 2.9 years, and >2.9 years (late ablation). The primary end point was atrial fibrillation recurrence after the 90-day blanking period, defined by admission for atrial fibrillation, cardioversions, use of antiarrhythmic drugs, or repeat atrial fibrillation ablations. The secondary end point was a composite end point of heart failure, ischemic stroke, or death, and each event individually. The study cohort consisted of 7705 patients. The 5-year cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation recurrence in the 4 groups was 42.9%, 54.8%, 55.9%, and 58.4%, respectively. Hazard ratios were 1.20 (95% CI, 1.07-1.35), 1.29 (95% CI, 1.13-1.47), and 1.40 (95% CI, 1.28-1.53), respectively, with the early ablation group as reference. The hazard ratio for the combined secondary end point was 1.22 (95% CI, 1.04-1.44) in the late ablation group compared with the early ablation group., Conclusions: In patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation, early ablation was associated with a significantly lower risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence. Furthermore, the associated risk of heart failure, ischemic stroke, or death was significantly lower in early-compared with late-ablation patients.

Background: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel nonthermal ablation technology with high procedural safety and efficiency for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Premarket data showed high PVI durability during mandatory remapping studies. Data on lesion durability in real-world patients with clinically indicated redo procedures are scarce., Objectives: This study sought to report PVI durability rates in patients undergoing a clinically indicated redo procedure after an index PVI using PFA., Methods: Patients from 7 European centers undergoing an index PVI using PFA were included the EU-PORIA (European Real-world Outcomes With Pulsed Field Ablation in Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation) registry. In patients with subsequent left atrial redo procedures due to arrhythmia recurrence, 3-dimensional electroanatomical maps were acquired. PVI durability was assessed on a per-vein and per-patient level, and sites of reconnections and predictors of lesion durability were identified., Results: Of 1,184 patients (62% paroxysmal atrial fibrillation) undergoing an index PVI using PFA, 272 (23%) had an arrhythmia recurrence. Of these, 144 (53%) underwent a left atrial redo procedure a median of 7 (Q1-Q3: 5-10) months after the first ablation. Three-dimensional electroanatomical maps identified 404 of 567 pulmonary veins (71%) with durable isolation. In 54 patients (38%), all pulmonary veins were durably isolated. Prior operator experience with cryoballoon ablation was associated with a higher PVI durability compared to operators with only point-by-point radiofrequency experience (76% vs 60%; P < 0.001). Neither the operators' cumulative experience in atrial fibrillation ablation (≤5 vs >5 years) nor the size of the PFA device used (31 mm vs 35 mm) had an impact on subsequent lesion durability (both P > 0.50)., Conclusions: In 144 patients with arrhythmia recurrence after PFA PVI, durable isolation was observed in 71% of the pulmonary veins during the redo procedure, and 38% of all patients showed durable isolation of all veins., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The EU-PORIA registry was supported by a research grant from Boston Scientific. Dr Bordignon has received honoraria from Medtronic and Biosense Webster. Dr Neven has served as a consultant for Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Field Medical, and LifeTech Scientific. Dr Blaauw has received research grants from Medtronic and Atricure; has received speaker/consulting fees from Abbott/St Jude Medical and Boston-Scientific, all for work outside the submitted study. Dr Hansen has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific and Biosense Webster. Dr Füting has received an educational grant from Boston Scientific. Dr Roten has received research grants from Medtronic and speaker/consulting fees from Abbott and Medtronic. Dr Reinsch has served as a consultant for Boston Scientific. Dr Boveda has served as a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Microport, and Zoll. Drs Albrecht and Schneider are salaried employees of Boston Scientific. Dr Chun has served as a consultant for and has received honoraria as well as research funding from Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Biosense Webster. Dr Schmidt has served as a consultant for and has received honoraria as well as research funding from Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Biosense Webster. Dr Reichlin has received research grants from the Goldschmidt-Jacobson Foundation, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation and the sitem insel support fund, all for work outside the submitted study; has received speaker/consulting fees or travel support from Abbott/St Jude Medical, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic; and has received support for his institution’s fellowship program from Abbott/St Jude Medical, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel method of cardiac ablation where there is insufficient knowledge on the durability and reconnection patterns after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The aim of this study was to characterize the electrophysiological findings at time of repeat procedure in real-world atrial fibrillation (AF) patients., Methods: Patients who underwent a repeat procedure (n=26) for symptomatic recurrent arrhythmias after index first-time treatment with single-shot PFA PVI (n=266) from July 2021 to June 2023 were investigated with 3D high-density mapping and ad-hoc re-ablation by radiofrequency or focal PFA., Results: Index indication for PVI was persistent AF in 17 (65%) patients. The mean time to repeat procedure was 292 ± 119 days. Of the 26 patients (104 veins), complete durable PVI was observed in 11/26 (42%) with a durable vein isolation rate of 72/104 (69%). Two patients (8%) had all four veins reconnected. The posterior wall was durably isolated in 4/5 (80%) of the cases. The predominant arrhythmia mechanism was AF in 17/26 (65%) patients and regular atrial tachycardia (AT) in 9/26 (35%). Reconnection was observed 9/26 (35%) in right superior, 11/26 (42%) in right inferior, 7/26 (27%) in left superior, 5/26 (19%) in left inferior, p=0.31 between veins. The gaps were significantly clustered in the right-sided anterior carina compared to other regions (P=0.009)., Conclusions: Durable PVI was observed in less than half of the patients at time of repeat procedure. No significant difference in PV reconnection pattern was observed, but the gap location was preferentially located at the anterior aspects of the right-sided PVs. Predominant recurrence was AF. More data is needed to establish lesion formation and durability and AT circuits after PFA., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Focal pulsed field ablation (FPFA) is a novel and promising method of cardiac ablation. The aim of this study was to report the feasibility, short-term safety, and procedural findings for a broad spectrum of ablated atrial arrhythmias., Methods: Patients (n = 51) scheduled for ablation of atrial arrhythmias were prospectively included and underwent FPFA using the Galvanize CENTAURI generator with energy delivery through commercially available ablation catheters with ultrahigh-density (UHDx) 3D electroanatomic voltage/local activation time map evaluations. Workflow, procedural data, and peri-procedural technical errors and complications are described., Results: Planned ablation strategy was achieved with FPFA-only in 48/51 (94%) of the cases. Ablation strategy was first-time pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in 17/51 (36%), repeat ablation in 18/51 (38%), PVI + in 13/51 (28%), and cavotricuspid isthmus block (CTI)-only in 3/51 (6%). The mean procedure time was 104 ± 31 min (first-time PVI), 114 ± 26 min (repeat procedure), 152 ± 36 min (PVI +), and 62 ± 17 min (CTI). Mean UHDx mapping time to assess lesion formation and block after ablation was 7 ± 4 min with 5485 ± 4809 points. First pass acute (linear) isolation with bidirectional block for anatomical lesion sets was 120/124 (97%) for all PVs, 17/17 (100%) for (any) isthmus, and 14/17 (82%) for left atrium posterior wall (LAPW). We observed several time-consuming integration errors with the used ablation system (mean 3.4 ± 3.7 errors/procedure), one transient inferior ST elevation when ablating CTI resolved by intravenous nitroglycerine and one transient AV block requiring temporary pacing for > 24 h., Conclusions: FPFA was a highly versatile method to treat atrial arrhythmias with high first-pass efficiency. UHDx revealed acute homogenous low-voltage lesions in ablated areas. More data is needed to establish lesion durability and limitations of FPFA., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence during the blanking period (early ATA) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is associated with an increased risk of later recurrence, but its relationship with pulmonary vein reconduction (PVR) is poorly understood. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between early ATA and PVR. Second, to provide data on the optimal blanking period by (a) evaluating how the predictive values of ATA for PVR are affected by blanking period duration, and (b) assessing the temporal development in atrial fibrillation (AF) burden., Methods: In this RACE-AF substudy, 91 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing PVI randomized to radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation were included. All patients received an implantable cardiac monitor and underwent a protocol-mandated repeat procedure after 4-6 months for assessment of PVR. ATA ≥ 30 s. ≤ 90 days after PVI constituted early ATA., Results: PVR was found in 37/54 (69%) patients with early ATA and in 11/37 (30%) patients without (p < .001). The positive predictive value of ATA for PVR was independent of blanking period duration (range 0-90 days). In both patients with and without PVR, AF burden was higher in the first month after PVI, but AF burden from the second month was similar to AF burden after the conventional blanking period., Conclusion: Early ATA indicates PVR, and the positive predictive value is independent of the blanking period duration. Altogether, the results of this study support substantially shortening the blanking period after PVI for paroxysmal AF., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Aims: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a new, non-thermal ablation modality for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The multi-centre EUropean Real World Outcomes with Pulsed Field AblatiOn in Patients with Symptomatic AtRIAl Fibrillation (EU-PORIA) registry sought to determine the safety, efficacy, and learning curve characteristics for the pentaspline, multi-electrode PFA catheter., Methods and Results: All-comer AF patients from seven high-volume centres were consecutively enrolled. Procedural and follow-up data were collected. Learning curve effects were analysed by operator ablation experience and primary ablation modality. In total, 1233 patients (61% male, mean age 66 ± 11years, 60% paroxysmal AF) were treated by 42 operators. In 169 patients (14%), additional lesions outside the PVs were performed, most commonly at the posterior wall (n = 127). Median procedure and fluoroscopy times were 58 (interquartile range: 40-87) and 14 (9-21) min, respectively, with no differences due to operator experience. Major complications occurred in 21/1233 procedures (1.7%) including pericardial tamponade (14; 1.1%) and transient ischaemic attack or stroke (n = 7; 0.6%), of which one was fatal. Prior cryoballoon users had less complication. At a median follow-up of 365 (323-386) days, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of arrhythmia-free survival was 74% (80% for paroxysmal and 66% for persistent AF). Freedom from arrhythmia was not influenced by operator experience. In 149 (12%) patients, a repeat procedure was performed due to AF recurrence and 418/584 (72%) PVs were durably isolated., Conclusion: The EU-PORIA registry demonstrates a high single-procedure success rate with an excellent safety profile and short procedure times in a real-world, all-comer AF patient population., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: B.S. is a consultant for and has received honoraria as well as research funding from Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Biosense Webster. S.B. has received honoraria from Medtronic and Biosense Webster. K.R.J.C. is a consultant for and has received honoraria as well as research funding from Abbott, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Biosense Webster. S.B. is consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Microport, and Zoll. R.A.: none. R.M.: none. T.R. has received research grants from the Goldschmidt-Jacobson Foundation, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, and the sitem insel support fund, all for work outside the submitted study. He has received speaker/consulting honoraria or travel support from Abbott/SJM, Bayer, Biosense-Webster, Biotronik, Boston-Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Farapulse, Medtronic, and Pfizer-BMS, all for work outside the submitted study. He has received support for his institution’s fellowship program from Abbott/SJM, Biosense-Webster, Biotronik, Boston-Scientific, and Medtronic for work outside the submitted study. L.R. received research grants from Medtronic and speaker/consulting honoraria from Abbott and Medtronic. T.K.: none. K.N. is a consultant for Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, Field Medical, and LifeTech Scientific. A.F.: educational grant from Boston Scientific. N.R.: consultant for Boston Scientific. J.H.: speakers fees from Boston Scientific and Biosense Webster. M.H.R.: none. A.O.: none. P.v.d.V.: none. Y.B. has received research grants from Medtronic and Atricure. He has received speaker/consulting honoraria from Abbott/SJM and Boston-Scientific, all for work outside the submitted study. B.A.M.: none. C.W.S. and E.M.A.: salaried employees of Boston Scientific., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Posterior wall isolation (PWI) added to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is increasingly used in ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) despite limited evidence of clinical benefit. We investigated the 5-year outcomes of a PVI + PWI ablation strategy with mandatory repeat procedures in PeAF., Methods: Twenty-four patients with PeAF participated in this single-arm prospective study and underwent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with wide area circumferential ablation (WACA), roof, and inferior lines for PVI + PWI which was reinforced if required during mandated repeat procedures after 6 months. Then, patients were followed for 60 months using continuous heart rhythm monitoring by implanted cardiac monitors (ICM) and atrial fibrillation effect on quality-of-life scoring (AFEQT; range: 20-100 points) for the initial 30 months., Results: ICM-verified cumulated AF recurrence was 54% after 30 months but the ensuing AF burden was only median 0‰ [0 to 4.8‰] overall and 1‰ [0 to 8 ‰] among patients with any recurrence. AFEQT scores increased from baseline 60 points [48 to 72] to 93 points [84 to 96] at repeat procedures P < 0.0001 and further to 96 points [93 to 99] P = 0.03 after 30 months. After 60 months, at least one episode of AF had been documented in 63% and two patients (8%) were in permanent AF., Conclusion: Reinforced PVI + PWI was associated with low long-term AF burden and corresponding improvements in quality-of-life. Reinforced (or durable) PVI + PWI appears to be a promising strategy to treat PeAF., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT05045131., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: Reconnections to pulmonary vein (PV) triggers of atrial fibrillation (AF) are the primary cause of AF recurrence after PV isolation (PVI) with radiofrequency (RF) or cryoballoon catheter ablation (CRYO), but method-specific contributions to PV reconduction pattern and conductive gap location are incompletely understood., Methods: The objective of this radiofrequency versus cryoballoon catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation substudy was to determine procedure-specific patterns of PV reconduction in a randomized population with protocol-mandated repeat procedures, irrespective of AF recurrence. Each PV was assessed in turn and PV reconnection sites were identified by high-density electroanatomical mapping and locating the earliest activation site. Gap locations were verified by PV re-isolation., Results: In 98 patients, 81% versus 76% previously isolated PVs remained isolated after CRYO versus RF (risk ratio [RR]: 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96-1.18; p = .28). There were no significant differences for any PV: left superior PV: 90% versus 80%; left inferior PV: 80% versus 78%; right superior PV: 81% versus 80%, and right inferior PV: 76% versus 73%. For each reconnected PV, 34% of ipsilateral PVs were also reconnected after CRYO compared with 64% after RF (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.32-0.90; p = .01). After RF, gaps were clustered by the carina and adjacent segments, whereas they were more heterogeneously distributed after CRYO., Conclusion: Although RF and CRYO produce similar proportions of durably isolated PVs, gap locations appear to develop in procedure-specific patterns. After RF, ipsilateral PV reconduction is more frequent and gap sites cluster by the carina, suggesting that this region should be selectively ablated for more durable PVI., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Aims: Overweight is associated with increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), but the impact of overweight and AF recurrence after ablation is less clear. Despite this, an increasing number of AF ablations are carried out in overweight patients. We investigated the impact of body mass index (BMI) on AF recurrence rates after ablation., Methods and Results: Through Danish nationwide registers, all patients undergoing first-time AF ablation between 2010 and 2018 were identified. Exposure of interest was BMI. The primary outcome was recurrent AF, defined from either any usage of antiarrhythmic medication, AF hospitalization, cardioversion, or re-ablation. A total of 9188 patients were included. Median age and interquartile range was 64 (60-75) in the normal-weight group and 60 (53-66) in the morbidly obese. There was an increase in comorbidity burden with increasing BMI, including a higher prevalence of heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and hypertension. At 1- and 5-year follow ups, recurrence rates of AF increased incrementally by BMI categories. The hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of recurrent AF after ablation were 1.15 (1.07-1.23), 1.18 (1.09-1.28), and 1.26 (1.13-1.41) in overweight, obese, and morbidly obese, respectively, compared with normal-weight patients. Procedure duration and X-ray dose exposure also increased with increasing BMI., Conclusion: Following AF ablation, recurrence rates of AF increased incrementally with increasing BMI. Therefore, aggressive weight management pre ablation in overweight patients could potentially provide substantial benefits and improve short- and long-term outcomes after ablation., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: JH has received consultant fees and speaker honoraria from Biosense Webster, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific, and research funding from Biosense Webster and Medtronic. R.H.W. has received consultant fees, speaker honoraria, and research funding from Biosense Webster. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established treatment option for atrial fibrillation (AF), where sedation and analgesia are pivotal for patient comfort and lesion formation. The impact of anaesthesia type on AF recurrence rates remains uncertain. This study aimed to examine AF recurrence rates depending on conscious sedation (CS) vs. general anaesthesia (GA) during CA. Methods and results Utilizing nationwide data from the Danish healthcare registries, we conducted this cohort study involving adults (≥18 years) undergoing first-time CA for AF between 2010 and 2018. Patients were categorized by anaesthesia type (CS or GA), with the primary endpoint being AF recurrence, defined by a composite endpoint of either antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) prescriptions, AF-related hospital admissions, electrical cardioversions, or AF re-ablation. The impact of anaesthesia type was evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis. The study cohort comprised 7957 (6421 CS and 1536 GA) patients. Persistent AF, hypertension, and heart failure, as well as use of AAD, were more prevalent in the GA group. Cumulative incidences of recurrent AF were higher in the CS group at 1 (46% vs. 37%) and at 5 (68% vs. 63%) years. Multivariate analysis revealed CS as significantly associated with increased risk of AF recurrence at 5-year follow-up [hazard ratio 1.26 (95% confidence interval 1.15–1.38)], consistent across paroxysmal and persistent AF subtypes. Conclusion This nationwide cohort study suggests a higher risk of AF recurrence with CS during CA compared to GA. These results advocate for considering GA as the preferred anaesthesia type for improved CA outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]