Search

ObjectiveTo evaluate efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide in children and adolescents with uncontrolled focal (partial-onset) seizures.MethodsIn this double-blind trial (SP0969;NCT01921205), patients (age ≥4–ResultsThree hundred forty-three patients were randomized; 306 (lacosamide 152 of 171 [88.9%]; placebo 154 of 172 [89.5%]) completed treatment (titration and maintenance). Adverse events (AEs) were the most common reasons for discontinuation during treatment (lacosamide 4.1%; placebo 5.8%). From baseline to maintenance, percent reduction in focal seizure frequency per 28 days for lacosamide (n = 170) vs placebo (n = 168) was 31.7% (p= 0.0003). During maintenance, median percent reduction in focal seizure frequency per 28 days was 51.7% for lacosamide and 21.7% for placebo. Fifty percent responder rates (≥50% reduction) were 52.9% and 33.3% (odds ratio 2.17,p= 0.0006). During treatment, treatment-emergent AEs were reported by 67.8% lacosamide-treated patients (placebo 58.1%), most commonly (≥10%) somnolence (14.0%, placebo 5.2%) and dizziness (10.5%, placebo 3.5%).ConclusionsAdjunctive lacosamide was efficacious in reducing seizure frequency and generally well tolerated in patients (age ≥4–ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT01921205.Classification of evidenceThis trial provides Class I evidence that for children and adolescents with uncontrolled focal seizures, adjunctive lacosamide reduces seizure frequency.

An intermediate-sized, multicenter, expanded-access study was opened in 2015 through the support of the State of Georgia. This study provided children with treatment-resistant epilepsy (TRE) access to plant-derived highly purified cannabidiol (CBD; Epidiolex® in the US; Epidyolex® in the EU; 100 mg/mL oral solution). These children had failed to achieve seizure freedom with available treatment options and were ineligible to participate in randomized controlled trials that only included patients with Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndromes.Cannabidiol safety, changes in seizure type, frequency, and seizure-free days were evaluated for children aged 1-18 years (at time of consent) as an adjunctive treatment for 36 months. The study consisted of a two-month baseline period, a titration period, treatment period, and optional titration period, which occurred after ≥26 weeks of treatment. Cannabidiol treatment was administered up to a targeted dose of 25 mg/kg/day, with an optional secondary treatment up to 50 mg/kg/day. Daily seizure type, seizure frequency, and seizure-free days were recorded in a Web-based diary, and changes in these outcomes were recorded and analyzed for the duration of the study. The occurrence of adverse events (AEs) was also recorded.The median percentage change in seizures for 45 patients in Months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 showed a statistically significant (p 0.001) reduction in major seizures (ranging from 54 to 72% at various time points) and all seizures (61-70%) compared with baseline. A mean increase in seizure-free days per 28 days was5 in all treatment periods after Month 2, and an average increase of 7.52 (p 0.001) seizure-free days per 28 days was observed at the end of follow-up compared with baseline. All patients experienced ≥1 AE. Children who transitioned to the optional secondary treatment (high-dose group) reported more AEs before increasing their dose to25.0 mg/kg/day compared with the low-dose group. However, the average rate of AEs was significantly lower after moving to a high-dose regimen (p = 0.004). Twelve children reported 20 serious AEs, none of which were considered related to CBD.This study supports CBD as an adjunctive treatment for children with TRE. Treatment was well tolerated in doses up to 50 mg/kg/day. Patients who did not achieve desired results at a dose of ≤25.0 mg/kg/day reported more AEs when CBD dose increased to25.0 mg/kg/day. Decreases in major seizure frequency and an increase in seizure-free days compared with baseline were reported during treatment. This supports the efficacy and tolerability of CBD for mixed seizure etiologies.

Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is a congenital disorder of neuronal migration that is increasingly recognized as a common cause of seizures in children, occurring in 20–30% of all surgically treated cases of epilepsy in the pediatric population. Advances in neuroimaging have contributed to recognition of FCD. We report 15 children (9 female, 6 male) with FCD and surgically treated intractable epilepsy. In 9 cases, a surgical strategy of anatomic (frameless stereotactic) grid placement and physiologic (electrocorticography) resection was employed. Postoperative MRI scans were obtained, the pathologic specimen was graded according to the Brannstrom system, and seizure outcome was defined using the Engel classification. There were no deaths and no permanent morbidity. After, on average, 4 years since treatment, 10 children are seizure free, 2 are 2A, 2 are 2B and 1 is 3A. Predictors of good outcome are an MRI-defined lesion and increased cortical disorganization (higher Brannstrom grade). Subtotal resection did not preclude a seizure-free outcome.

Tuberous sclerosis complex is a genetic disorder leading to constitutive activation of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and growth of benign tumours in several organs. In the brain, growth of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas can cause life-threatening symptoms--eg, hydrocephalus, requiring surgery. In an open-label, phase 1/2 study, the mTOR inhibitor everolimus substantially and significantly reduced the volume of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas. We assessed the efficacy and safety of everolimus in patients with subependymal giant cell astrocytomas associated with tuberous sclerosis complex.In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, patients (aged 0-65 years) in 24 centres in Australia, Belgium, Canada, Germany, the UK, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Russian Federation, and the USA were randomly assigned, with an interactive internet-response system, in a 2:1 ratio to oral everolimus 4·5 mg/m(2) per day (titrated to achieve blood trough concentrations of 5-15 ng/mL) or placebo. Eligible patients had a definite diagnosis of tuberous sclerosis complex and at least one lesion with a diameter of 1 cm or greater, and either serial growth of a subependymal giant cell astrocytoma, a new lesion of 1 cm or greater, or new or worsening hydrocephalus. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with confirmed response--ie, reduction in target volume of 50% or greater relative to baseline in subependymal giant cell astrocytomas. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00789828.117 patients were randomly assigned to everolimus (n=78) or placebo (n=39). 27 (35%) patients in the everolimus group had at least 50% reduction in the volume of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas versus none in the placebo group (difference 35%, 95% CI 15-52; one-sided exact Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, p0·0001). Adverse events were mostly grade 1 or 2; no patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. The most common adverse events were mouth ulceration (25 [32%] in the everolimus group vs two [5%] in the placebo group), stomatitis (24 [31%] vs eight [21%]), convulsion (18 [23%] vs ten [26%]), and pyrexia (17 [22%] vs six [15%]).These results support the use of everolimus for subependymal giant cell astrocytomas associated with tuberous sclerosis. Additionally, everolimus might represent a disease-modifying treatment for other aspects of tuberous sclerosis.Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

The intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP) is routinely conducted as part of the presurgical evaluation of pediatric patients with epilepsy. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possibility that anesthetization failures are the result of interactions of carbonic anhydrase-inhibiting (CAI) medications with sodium amobarbital. An archival review of 81 cases conducted between 1999 and 2008 was performed across two pediatric epilepsy centers. chi(2) analysis was used to assess whether CAI medications interfered with the outcome of these procedures. Of 81 patients, 85.2% had conclusive findings. All of the remaining 14.8% with anesthetization failures were taking CAI medications at the time of the procedure. However, 53.8% of patients taking CAI medications had conclusive results. This suggests that these medications may interact with sodium amobarbital, raising the possibility of anesthetization failures in children prescribed CAI medications.

Eleven children with acute inflammatory polyneuropathy were treated with a short course of intensive plasmapheresis. The 5 males and 6 females ranged in age from 19 months to 16 years (mean: 7.8 years). The interval from disease onset to the initiation of plasmapheresis therapy was less than 7 days in 5 patients and less than 2 weeks in the others. At the time of the first plasmapheresis, 3 patients were on respirators (Grade 5 on the Guillain-Barre syndrome scale 0–6); 7 were bedridden (Grade 4); and 1 required assisted ambulation (Grade 3). One week after the last plasmapheresis, all but 1 patient had improved by 1 or more grades on the Guillain-Barre syndrome scale. At subsequent examination 6 months later, all patients were ambulatory and 9 of 11 had no significant neurologic findings. Electrophysiologic studies performed shortly before treatment initiation revealed predominant demyelinating neuropathy in 9 and axonal changes in 2. During the 76 plasmapheresis procedures, no severe complications were encountered. Although the number of patients treated is small, the clinical response observed would indicate plasmapheresis to be a safe and effective therapy in children with acute inflammatory polyneuropathy.