Search

• A longer calibration period is required for catchments with nonstationary rainfall-runoff relationships to achieve stable simulations. • With the increase in the length of the interval between the calibration and transfer periods, the transferability of the model decreases gradually. • When forecasting runoff under nonstationary rainfall-runoff relationships, the closeness of the total rainfall amount between calibration and transfer periods is more important than the similarity in rainfall processes. Changing climatic conditions have changed the stationary rainfall-runoff relationships in many basins. In this context, the value of the model parameters will depend more on the selection of the calibration period, which directly affects the accuracy of runoff forecasting. However, systematic exploration and testing of the impact of calibration conditions on the transferability of hydrological models under stationary and nonstationary climatic conditions require more effort. The present study investigates the impact of four calibration conditions on model transferability, including the length of the calibration period, the length of the interval between the calibration and transfer periods, the difference in climate conditions as measured by the total rainfall amount between the calibration and transfer periods, and the difference in the similarity of rainfall processes between the calibration and transfer periods. Two catchments with stationary and nonstationary climatic conditions, and five models, including XAJ, HBV, IHACRES, SIMHYD and GR4J, are used in this study. The results show that (1) a longer calibration period is required for catchments with nonstationary rainfall-runoff relationships to achieve stable simulations; (2) with the increase in the length of the interval between the calibration and transfer periods, the transferability of the model decreases gradually, and the degree of reduction is greater for catchments with nonstationary climatic conditions and rainfall-runoff relationships; and (3) when forecasting future runoff under nonstationary rainfall-runoff relationships, the closeness of the total rainfall amount between the calibration and transfer periods is more important than the similarity in rainfall series between the calibration and transfer periods. This study provides insight into the impact of calibration conditions on the transferability of hydrological models in the context of climate change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• An evaluation method of model transferability is proposed. • The complex models (XAJ and HBV) have better spatial transferability than the simple model (GR4J). • The performance of models transferred from the wettest to the driest period is worse than that of models transferred from the driest to the wettest period. Changing conditions of the climate and underlying surface have altered the rainfall-runoff relationships in many basins, greatly increasing additional challenges in the applicability of hydrological models for studying the hydrological response to those potential changes. However, systematic and simultaneous testing and comparing of both temporal and spatial transferabilities of different hydrological models under changing conditions have not received enough attention. The present study investigates the potential differences between temporal and spatial transferabilities of different hydrological models under different climatic and underlying surface conditions, which are synthesized from two basins in Southern China with 50-year historical records (1966–2015). The transferability of five hydrological models, i.e., XAJ, HBV, SIMHYD, IHACRES and GR4J, is investigated under the synthesised changing conditions by using a new evaluation method, proposed in this study. The results show that: (1) the proposed evaluation method is proved to be effective in evaluating the transferability of the models; (2) for temporal transferability under stationary condition, the five models show similar performances, but for spatial transferability, the performances of complex models (XAJ and HBV) are better than that of the simple model (GR4J); (3) the difference in underlying surface conditions in the target basin affects spatial transferability of the models; (4) hydrological models have much better transferability from dry to wet period than otherwise. This study provides an insight to test temporal and spatial transferabilities of hydrological models in the context of changing climate and underlying surface conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]