Search

Anxiety and depression symptoms are frequently experienced by individuals with psychosis, although prevalence rates have not been reviewed in first-episode psychosis (FEP). The aim of this systematic review was to focus on the prevalence rates for both anxiety and depression, comparing the rates within the same study population. A systematic review and meta-analysis was completed for all studies measuring both anxiety and depression in FEP at baseline. The search identified 6040 citations, of which n = 10 met inclusion criteria. These reported 1265 patients (age 28.3 ± 9.1, females: 39.9%) with diagnosed FEP. Studies which used diagnosis to define comorbidity count were included in separate meta-analyses for anxiety and depression, although the heterogeneity was high limiting interpretation of separate prevalence rates. A random-effects meta-analysis also compared the mean difference between anxiety and depression within the same studies. We show that anxiety and depression co-occur at a similar rate within FEP, although the exact rates are not reliable due to the heterogeneity between the small number of studies. Future research in FEP should consider routinely measuring anxiety and depression using continuous self-report measures of symptoms. Clinically we recommend that both anxiety and depression are equally targeted during psychological intervention in FEP, together with the psychotic symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The current diagnostic system for subjects at enhanced clinical risk of psychosis allows concurrent comorbid diagnoses of anxiety and depressive disorders. Their impact on the presenting high-risk psychopathology, functioning, and transition outcomes has not been widely researched. Methods: In a large sample of subjects with an At-Risk Mental State (ARMS, n = 509), we estimated the prevalence of DSM/SCID anxiety or depressive disorders and their impact on psychopathology, functioning, and psychosis transition. A meta-analytical review of the literature complemented the analysis. Results: About 73% of ARMS subjects had a comorbid axis I diagnosis in addition to the “at-risk” signs and symptoms. About 40% of ARMS subjects had a comorbid diagnosis of depressive disorder while anxiety disorders were less frequent (8%). The meta-analysis conducted in 1683 high-risk subjects confirmed that baseline prevalence of comorbid depressive and anxiety disorders is respectively 41% and 15%. At a psychopathological level, comorbid diagnoses of anxiety or depression were associated with higher suicidality or self-harm behaviors, disorganized/odd/stigmatizing behavior, and avolition/apathy. Comorbid anxiety and depressive diagnoses were also associated with impaired global functioning but had no effect on risk of transition to frank psychosis. Meta-regression analyses confirmed no effect of baseline anxiety and/or depressive comorbid diagnoses on transition to psychosis. Conclusions: The ARMS patients are characterized by high prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders in addition to their attenuated psychotic symptoms. These symptoms may reflect core emotional dysregulation processes and delusional mood in prodromal psychosis. Anxiety and depressive symptoms are likely to impact the ongoing psychopathology, the global functioning, and the overall longitudinal outcome of these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objective: Co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders are highly prevalent among young people attending services, yet few studies have examined the effect of such comorbidity among those referred for treatment. The aim of the current study was to examine the impact of co-occurring substance use disorders (SUDs) on 6 month outcomes for young people seeking mental health treatment. Method: One hundred and six young people (aged 15-24 years) with a non-psychotic DSM-IV Axis I disorder were assessed following referral to a specialist youth public mental health service. Participants were given a structured interview, as well as questionnaires assessing drug use, psychopathology, psychosocial functioning and self-esteem at baseline and 6 month follow up. Results: At baseline, 23 participants met criteria for a co-occurring SUD and 83 had a non-psychotic Axis I disorder. Both the non-SUD and the co-occurring SUD groups had high levels of psychopathology, serious impairments in functioning and moderate levels of suicidal ideation, although those with co-occurring SUD had significantly poorer levels of functioning. At 6 month follow up the co-occurring SUD group continued to experience substantial problems with symptoms and functioning whereas the non-SUD group had significant improvement in both of these domains. Conclusions: The present findings are consistent with studies examining the impact of co-occurring substance use and mental health issues across different treatment settings, and reinforce recommendations that young people with co-occurring disorders require more intensive and integrated interventions. The present findings also highlight the need for routine assessment and management of substance use issues within youth mental health settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the need of extending the upper age range for early intervention for psychosis services. Topics include expanding the clinical focus to emerging and early phases of a range of psychiatric illnesses; high rates of comorbidity between anxiety, depression and sub-threshold psychotic symptoms in young people; and concerns about the privatization of National Health Service (NHS) in the Great Britain such as lack of transparency about profits, costs, and level of care.

Abstract: Few studies have addressed the correlates of trauma in young people at Ultra-High Risk (UHR) of developing a psychotic disorder. We aimed to examine baseline differences in intensity, form and content of attenuated positive psychotic symptoms, other clinical symptomatology and comorbidity between UHR patients with and without a history of trauma. In a sample of 127 UHR individuals (53 male, 74 female; mean age 18.2 years, range 14–26) we assessed trauma history and baseline symptomatology using an audit tool developed to retrieve data from patient medical records. 56% of the subjects had experienced at least one type of trauma. The intensity of perceptual abnormalities was significantly higher in the group with a history of physical abuse and ‘other trauma’ compared to those without a trauma history. Physical abuse was related to higher levels of visual disturbances, suspiciousness, grandiose beliefs and low mood compared to those without a history of physical abuse. Sexual trauma was related to perceptual disturbances with abusive content and PTSD symptoms. The prevalence of previous trauma in people at UHR of developing psychosis is high. Our findings tentatively suggest that different types of trauma may impact differently on initial presentation to UHR services. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: We evaluated whether (1) a diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) at baseline, or (2) the persistence, remission or emergence of de novo OCD at follow-up, were associated with the development of different psychotic disorders in a cohort of individuals at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis. Methods: Patients were assessed for OCD at baseline and after a mean of 7.4 years follow-up and classified into: (i) Non-OCD group - patients without OCD both at baseline and follow-up (n = 269; 86.2%), (ii) Incident OCD group - patients without OCD at baseline but with OCD at follow-up (n = 17; 5.4%), (iii) Remitting OCD group - patients with OCD at baseline but without OCD at follow-up (n = 20; 6.4%), (iv) Persistent OCD group - patients with OCD both at baseline and at follow-up (n = 6; 1.9%). Rates of different DSM-IV psychotic disorders at follow-up were compared across these groups. Results: Patients who displayed remitting OCD were not related to the development of any DSM-IV psychotic disorder. A diagnosis of incident OCD was associated with greater rates of psychotic disorders at follow-up, particularly mood disorders with psychotic features and psychotic disorders not otherwise specified (PDNOS), and greater baseline severity of general psychopathology, alogia, and avolition-apathy. Two of the six patients (40%) with persistent OCD developed schizophrenia, while only 12.5%, 5.0%, and 9.7% of incident, remitting, and non-OCD groups, respectively, exhibited the same condition at follow-up. Rates of antipsychotic use in the previous two years were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that, in a cohort of individuals at UHR for psychosis, remission of OCD does not increase the risk of psychosis, while de novo OCD was associated with development of mood disorders with psychotic features and PDNOS. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]