Search

We analyze the problem of folding one polyhedron, viewed as a metric graph of its edges, into the shape of another, similar to 1D origami. We find such foldings between all pairs of Platonic solids and prove corresponding lower bounds, establishing the optimal scale factor when restricted to integers. Further, we establish that our folding problem is also NP-hard, even if the source graph is a tree. It turns out that the problem is hard to approximate, as we obtain NP-hardness even for determining the existence of a scale factor 1.5-{\epsilon}. Finally, we prove that, in general, the optimal scale factor has to be rational. This insight then immediately results in NP membership. In turn, verifying whether a given scale factor is indeed the smallest possible, requires two independent calls to an NP oracle, rendering the problem DP-complete.

We prove that Hamiltonicity in maximum-degree-3 grid graphs (directed or undirected) is ASP-complete, i.e., it has a parsimonious reduction from every NP search problem (including a polynomial-time bijection between solutions). As a consequence, given k Hamiltonian cycles, it is NP-complete to find another; and counting Hamiltonian cycles is #P-complete. If we require the grid graph's vertices to form a full $m \times n$ rectangle, then we show that Hamiltonicity remains ASP-complete if the edges are directed or if we allow removing some edges (whereas including all undirected edges is known to be easy). These results enable us to develop a stronger "T-metacell" framework for proving ASP-completeness of rectangular puzzles, which requires building just a single gadget representing a degree-3 grid-graph vertex. We apply this general theory to prove ASP-completeness of 38 pencil-and-paper puzzles where the goal is to draw a loop subject to given constraints: Slalom, Onsen-meguri, Mejilink, Detour, Tapa-Like Loop, Kouchoku, Icelom; Masyu, Yajilin, Nagareru, Castle Wall, Moon or Sun, Country Road, Geradeweg, Maxi Loop, Mid-loop, Balance Loop, Simple Loop, Haisu, Reflect Link, Linesweeper; Vertex/Touch Slitherlink, Dotchi-Loop, Ovotovata, Building Walk, Rail Pool, Disorderly Loop, Ant Mill, Koburin, Mukkonn Enn, Rassi Silai, (Crossing) Ichimaga, Tapa, Canal View, Aqre, and Paintarea. The last 14 of these puzzles were not even known to be NP-hard. Along the way, we prove ASP-completeness of some simple forms of Tree-Residue Vertex-Breaking (TRVB), including planar multigraphs with degree-6 breakable vertices, or with degree-4 breakable and degree-1 unbreakable vertices., Comment: 34 pages, 41 figures. To appear at Fun with Algorithms 2024

We analyze Solo Chess puzzles, where the input is an $n \times n$ board containing some standard Chess pieces of the same color, and the goal is to make a sequence of capture moves to reduce down to a single piece. Prior work analyzes this puzzle for a single piece type when each piece is limited to make at most two capture moves (as in the Solo Chess puzzles on chess.com). By contrast, we study when each piece can make an unlimited number of capture moves. We show that any single piece type can be solved in polynomial time in a general model of piece types, while any two standard Chess piece types are NP-complete. We also analyze the restriction (as on chess.com) that one piece type is unique and must be the last surviving piece, showing that in this case some pairs of piece types become tractable while others remain hard., Comment: 22 pages, 9 figures. Presented at JCDCGGG 2022

We analyze the puzzle video game This Game Is Not Going To Load Itself, where the player routes data packets of three different colors from given sources to given sinks of the correct color. Given the sources, sinks, and some previously placed arrow tiles, we prove that the game is in Sigma_2^P; in NP for sources of equal period; NP-complete for three colors and six equal-period sources with player input; and even without player input, simulating the game is both NP- and coNP-hard for two colors and many sources with different periods. On the other hand, we characterize which locations for three data sinks admit a perfect placement of arrow tiles that guarantee correct routing no matter the placement of the data sources, effectively solving most instances of the game as it is normally played., Comment: 23 pages, 23 figures. Presented at JCDCGGG 2022

We investigate the complexity of the platform video game Celeste. We prove that navigating Celeste is PSPACE-hard in five different ways, corresponding to different subsets of the game mechanics. In particular, we prove the game PSPACE-hard even without player input., Comment: 15 pages, 13 figures. Presented at 23rd Thailand-Japan Conference on Discrete and Computational Geometry, Graphs, and Games

Consider $n^2-1$ unit-square blocks in an $n \times n$ square board, where each block is labeled as movable horizontally (only), movable vertically (only), or immovable -- a variation of Rush Hour with only $1 \times 1$ cars and fixed blocks. We prove that it is PSPACE-complete to decide whether a given block can reach the left edge of the board, by reduction from Nondeterministic Constraint Logic via 2-color oriented Subway Shuffle. By contrast, polynomial-time algorithms are known for deciding whether a given block can be moved by one space, or when each block either is immovable or can move both horizontally and vertically. Our result answers a 15-year-old open problem by Tromp and Cilibrasi, and strengthens previous PSPACE-completeness results for Rush Hour with vertical $1 \times 2$ and horizontal $2 \times 1$ movable blocks and 4-color Subway Shuffle., Comment: 15 pages, 11 figures. Improved figures and writing. To appear at FUN 2020

We analyze the computational complexity of several new variants of edge-matching puzzles. First we analyze inequality (instead of equality) constraints between adjacent tiles, proving the problem NP-complete for strict inequalities but polynomial for nonstrict inequalities. Second we analyze three types of triangular edge matching, of which one is polynomial and the other two are NP-complete; all three are #P-complete. Third we analyze the case where no target shape is specified, and we merely want to place the (square) tiles so that edges match (exactly); this problem is NP-complete. Fourth we consider four 2-player games based on $1 \times n$ edge matching, all four of which are PSPACE-complete. Most of our NP-hardness reductions are parsimonious, newly proving #P and ASP-completeness for, e.g., $1 \times n$ edge matching., Comment: 29 pages, 18 figures. Thorough revisions of Sections 4, 5, and 6/7 (merged)