Search

Background: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is well-established for diagnosis and stratification of coronary artery disease (CAD). Its usefulness in guiding percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and stent sizing is unknown., Methods: This is a sub-analysis of the Precise Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Plan (P3) study (NCT03782688). We analyzed 65 vessels with matched CCTA and pre-PCI optical coherence tomography (OCT) assessment. The CCTA-guided stent size was defined by the mean distal reference lumen diameter rounded up to the nearest stent diameter. The OCT lumen-guided stent size was the mean distal reference lumen diameter rounded to the closest stent diameter. The agreement on stent diameters was determined with Kappa statistics, Passing-Bablok regression analysis, and the Bland-Altman method., Results: The distal reference lumen diameter by CCTA and OCT were 2.75 ​± ​0.53 ​mm and 2.72 ​± ​0.55 ​mm (mean difference 0.06, limits of agreement -0.7 to 0.82). There were no proportional or systematic differences (coefficient A 1.06, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.3 and coefficient B -0.22, 95% CI -0.83 to 0.36) between methods. The agreement between the CCTA and OCT stent size was substantial (Cohen's weighted Kappa 0.74, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.85). Compared to OCT stent diameter, CCTA stent size was concordant in 52.3% of the cases; CCTA overestimated stent size in 20.0% and underestimated in 27.7%., Conclusion: CCTA accurately assessed the reference vessel diameter used for stent sizing. CCTA-based stent sizing showed a substantial agreement with OCT. CCTA allows for PCI planning and may aid in selecting stent diameter., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest TM reports receiving consulting fees from Zeon Medical and HeartFlow Inc, and speaker fees from Abbott Vascular. BLN has received an unrestricted institutional research grant from HeartFlow Inc. MM is supported by a grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant NNF22OC0074083). BKK received an Institutional Research Grant from Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific Corporation, and Philips. BDB reports receiving consultancy fees from Boston Scientific and Abbott Vascular, research grants from Coroventis Research, Pie Medical Imaging, CathWorks, Boston Scientific, Siemens, HeartFlow Inc, and Abbott Vascular, and owning equity in Siemens, GE, Philips, HeartFlow Inc, Edwards Life Sciences, Bayer, Sanofi, Celyad. CC reports receiving research grants from Biosensor, Coroventis Research, Medis Medical Imaging, Pie Medical Imaging, CathWorks, Boston Scientific, Siemens, HeartFlow Inc, Abbott Vascular, and consultancy fees from HeartFlow Inc, OpSens, Abbott Vascular, and Philips Volcano. The other authors have no further disclosures., (Copyright © 2024 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The association between coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) and risk of recurrent angina in patients with new onset stable angina pectoris (SAP) and stenosis by CTA is uncertain., Methods: Multicenter 3-year follow-up study of patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of new onset SAP who underwent first-line CTA evaluation and subsequent standard-of-care treatment. All patients had at least one ≥30 ​% coronary stenosis. A per-patient lowest FFR CT -value ≤0.80 represented an abnormal test result. Patients with FFR CT ≤0.80 who underwent revascularization were categorized according to completeness of revascularization: 1) Completely revascularized (CR-FFR CT ), all vessels with FFR CT ≤0.80 revascularized; or 2) incompletely revascularized (IR-FFR CT ) ≥1 vessels with FFR CT ≤0.80 non-revascularized. Recurrent angina was evaluated using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire., Results: Amongst 769 patients (619 [80 ​%] stenosis ≥50 ​%, 510 [66 ​%] FFR CT ≤0.80), 174 (23 ​%) reported recurrent angina at follow-up. An FFR CT ≤0.80 vs ​> ​0.80 associated to increased risk of recurrent angina, relative risk (RR): 1.82; 95 ​% CI: 1.31-2.52, p ​< ​0.001. Risk of recurrent angina in CR-FFR CT (n ​= ​135) was similar to patients with FFR CT >0.80, 13 ​% vs 15 ​%, RR: 0.93; 95 ​% CI: 0.62-1.40, p ​= ​0.72, while IR-FFR CT (n ​= ​90) and non-revascularized patients with FFR CT ≤0.80 (n ​= ​285) had increased risk, 37 ​% vs 15 ​% RR: 2.50; 95 ​% CI: 1.68-3.73, p ​< ​0.001 and 30 ​% vs 15 ​%, RR: 2.03; 95 ​% CI: 1.44-2.87, p ​< ​0.001, respectively. Use of antianginal medication was similar across study groups., Conclusion: In patients with SAP and coronary stenosis by CTA undergoing standard-of-care guided treatment, FFR CT provides information regarding risk of recurrent angina., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest CR is a full-time employee of HeartFlow, and receives salary and stock options from HeartFlow. ELG has no conflicts related to this manuscript but has received speaker honoraria or consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, MSD, Lundbeck Pharma and Organon. He is investigator in clinical studies sponsored by AstraZeneca or Bayer and has received unrestricted research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim. JL is a consultant and holds stock options in Circle CVI and HeartFlow. KN acknowledges support from the NIH and reports unrestricted institutional research support from Siemens Healthineers, Bayer, HeartFlow Inc and Novartis. MP has received research grants from Janssen, Bayer, Heartflow and NIH and is part of the following advisory boards: Janssen, Bayer, Heartflow, Phillips. SM is a full-time employee of HeartFlow, and shareholder of HeartFlow. TF is associated with the HeartFlow speakers bureau. All other authors had no disclosures to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: CT coronary angiography (CTA) with Fractional Flow Reserve as determined by CT (FFR CT ) is a safe alternative to invasive coronary angiography. A negative FFR CT has been shown to have low cardiac event rates compared to those with a positive FFR CT . However, the clinical utility of FFR CT according to age is not known., Methods: Patients' in the ADVANCE (Assessing Diagnostic Value of Non-invasive FFRCT in Coronary Care) registry, were stratified into those ≥65 or <65 years of age. The impact of FFR CT on clinical decision-making, as assessed by patient age, was determined by evaluating patient management using CTA results alone, followed by site investigators submitting a report on the treatment plan based upon the newly provided FFR CT data. Outcomes at 1-year post CTA were assessed, including major adverse cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality or unplanned hospitalization for ACS leading to revascularisation) and total revascularisation. Positive FFR CT was deemed to be ​≤ ​0.8., Results: FFR CT was calculated in 1849 (40.6%) subjects aged <65 and 2704 (59.4%) ​≥ ​65 years of age. Subjects ≥65 years were more likely to have anatomic obstructive disease on CTA (≥50% stenosis), compared to those aged <65 (69.7% and 73.2% respectively, p ​= ​0.008). There was a similar graded increase in recommended and actual revascularisation with either CABG or PCI, with declining FFR CT strata for subjects above and below the age of 65. MACE and revascularisation rates were not significantly different for those ​≥ ​or <65, regardless of FFR CT positivity or stenosis severity <50% or ≥50%. With a negative FFR CT result, and anatomical stenosis ≥50%, those ​≥ ​and <65 years of age, had similar rates of MACE (0.2% for both, p ​= ​0.1) and revascularisation (8.7% and 10.4% respectively p ​= ​0.4). Logistic regression analysis, with age as a continuous variable, and adjustment for Diamond Forrester Risk, baseline FFR CT and treatment (CABG, PCI, medical therapy), indicated a statistically significant, but small increase in the odds of a MACE event with increasing age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.006-1.08, p ​= ​0.02). Amongst patients with a FFR CT > 0.80, there was no effect of age on the odds of revascularisation., Conclusion: The findings of this study point to a low risk of MACE events or need for revascularisation in those aged ​≥ ​or <65 with a FFR CT >0.80, despite the higher incidence of anatomic obstructive CAD in those ≥65 years. The findings show the clinical usefulness and outcomes of FFR CT are largely constant regardless of age., (Copyright © 2020 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The ADVANCE registry is a large prospective study of outcomes and resource utilization in patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and CT-based fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ). As experience with new technologies and practices develops over time, we investigated temporal changes in the use of FFR CT within the ADVANCE registry., Methods: 5083 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) on CCTA were prospectively enrolled in the ADVANCE registry and were divided into 3 equally sized cohorts based on the temporal order of enrollment per site. Demographics, CCTA and FFR CT findings, and clinical outcomes through 1-year follow-up, were recorded and compared between tertiles., Results: The number of patients with a ≥70% stenosis on CCTA was similar over time (33.6%, 30.9%, and 33.8% for cohort 1-3). The rate of positive FFR CT ≤0.80 was higher for cohorts 2 (67.3%) and 3 (74.6%) than for cohort 1 (57.1%, p < 0.001). Invasive FFR rates decreased from 25.8% to 22.4% between cohort 1 and 3 (p = 0.023). Moreover, patients with a FFR CT ≤0.80 were less frequently referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) (from 62.9% to 52.9%, p < 0.001), and underwent fewer revascularizations between cohort 1 and 3 (from 41.9% to 32.0%, p < 0.001). The prevalence of major events was low (1.2%) and similar between cohorts., Conclusions: Growing experience with FFR CT improved the likelihood of identifying hemodynamically significant CAD and safely reduced the need for ICA and revascularization in patients with anatomically significant disease even in the instance of an abnormal FFR CT., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Nous has received travel sponsorship from HeartFlow. Dr. Fairbairn has served on the Speakers Bureau for HeartFlow. Dr. Nørgaard has received unrestricted institutional research grants from Siemens and HeartFlow. Dr. Berman has received unrestricted research support from HeartFlow. Dr. Hurwitz-Koweek has received research support and fee as speaker from HeartFlow and Siemens. Dr. Pontone has received research grant and/or fee as speaker from GE Healthcare, Bracco, and HeartFlow. Dr. Budde has institutional research support from HeartFlow and Siemens Healthineers. Dr. Sonck has received research grant support from the Cardiopath PhD program. Dr. Rabbat has served as a consultant for HeartFlow. Dr. Mullen is an employee of and owns equity in HeartFlow. Dr. De Bruyne has received consulting fees from Abbott, Opsens, and Boston Scientific; and is a shareholder for Siemens, GE Healthcare, Bayer, Philips, HeartFlow, Edwards Lifesciences, and Sanofi. Dr. Rogers is employee of and owns equity in HeartFlow. Dr. Leipsic has served as a consultant for and owns stock options in Circle CVI and HeartFlow. Dr. Patel has received research grants from HeartFlow, Bayer, Janssen, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; and has served on the advisory board for HeartFlow, Bayer, and Janssen. Dr. Nieman has received institutional research support from Siemens Healthineers, HeartFlow, GE Healthcare, and Bayer Healthcare. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Turner syndrome (TS) is associated with coronary artery disease (CAD), an important cause of premature death in TS. However, the determinants of CAD in women with TS remain unknown. In a cross-sectional study design, 168 women without clinical evidence of CAD (115 with TS and 53 without TS) were assessed for the presence and volume of subclinical CAD using coronary CT angiography. Karyotype, the presence of congenital heart defects and conventional cardiovascular risk factors were also registered. Comparative analyses were performed (1) between women with and without TS and (2) in the TS group, between women with and without subclinical CAD. The prevalence of CAD, in crude and adjusted analyses, was not increased for women with TS (crude prevalence: 40 [35%] in TS vs. 25 [47%] in controls, p = 0.12). The volume of atherosclerosis was not higher in women with TS compared with controls (median and interquartile range 0 [0-92] in TS vs. 0 [0-81]mm 3 in controls, p = 0.29). Among women with TS, women with subclinical CAD were older (46 ± 13 vs. 37 ± 11 years, p < 0.001), had higher blood pressure (systolic blood pressure 129 ± 16 vs. 121 ± 16 mmHg, p < 0.05) and were more frequently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (5 [13%] vs. 2 [3%], p < 0.05). Karyotype or congenital heart defects were not associated with subclinical CAD. Some women with TS show early signs of CAD, however overall, not more than women without TS. Conventional cardiovascular risk factors were the principal determinants of CAD also in TS, and CAD prevention strategies should be observed.ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT01678261 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01678261 ).

Objectives: The 1-year data from the international ADVANCE (Assessing Diagnostic Value of Non-invasive FFR CT in Coronary Care) Registry of patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) was used to evaluate the relationship of fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CTA (FFR CT ) with downstream care and clinical outcomes., Background: Guidelines for management of chest pain using noninvasive imaging pathways are based on short- to intermediate-term outcomes., Methods: Patients (N = 5,083) evaluated for clinically suspected coronary artery disease and in whom atherosclerosis was identified by coronary CTA were prospectively enrolled at 38 international sites from July 15, 2015, to October 20, 2017. Demographics, symptom status, coronary CTA and FFR CT findings and resultant site-based treatment plans, and clinical outcomes through 1 year were recorded and adjudicated by a blinded core laboratory. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), death, myocardial infarction (MI), and acute coronary syndrome leading to urgent revascularization were captured., Results: At 1 year, 449 patients did not have follow-up data. Revascularization occurred in 1,208 (38.40%) patients with an FFR CT  ≤0.80 and in 89 (5.60%) with an FFR CT >0.80 (relative risk [RR]: 6.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.59 to 8.45; p < 0.001). MACE occurred in 55 patients, 43 events occurred in patients with an FFR CT  ≤0.80 and 12 occurred in those with an FFR CT >0.80 (RR: 1.81; 95% CI: 0.96 to 3.43; p = 0.06). Time to first event (all-cause death or MI) occurred in 38 (1.20%) patients with an FFR CT  ≤0.80 compared with 10 (0.60%) patients with an FFR CT >0.80 (RR: 1.92; 95% CI: 0.96 to 3.85; p = 0.06). Time to first event (cardiovascular death or MI) occurred cardiovascular death or MI occurred more in patients with an FFR CT  ≤0.80 compared with patients with an FFR CT >0.80 (25 [0.80%] vs. 3 [0.20%]; RR: 4.22; 95% CI: 1.28 to 13.95; p = 0.01)., Conclusions: The 1-year outcomes from the ADVANCE FFR CT Registry show low rates of events in all patients, with less revascularization and a trend toward lower MACE and significantly lower cardiovascular death or MI in patients with a negative FFR CT compared with patients with abnormal FFR CT values. (Assessing Diagnostic Value of Non-invasive FFRCT in Coronary Wave [ADVANCE]; NCT02499679)., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: We examined whether severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) measured by coronary computed tomography angiography can be used to predict rates of myocardial infarction (MI) and death in patients with and without diabetes., Methods and Results: A cohort study of consecutive patients (n = 48 731) registered in the Western Denmark Cardiac Computed Tomography Registry from 2008 to 2016. Patients were stratified by diabetes status and CAD severity (no, non-obstructive, or obstructive). Endpoints were MI and death. Event rates per 1000 person-years, unadjusted and adjusted incidence rate ratios were computed. Median follow-up was 3.6 years. Among non-diabetes patients, MI event rates per 1000 person-years were 1.4 for no CAD, 4.1 for non-obstructive CAD, and 9.1 for obstructive CAD. Among diabetes patients, the corresponding rates were 2.1 for no CAD, 4.8 for non-obstructive CAD, and 12.6 for obstructive CAD. Non-diabetes and diabetes patients without CAD had similar low rates of MI [adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71-2.78]. Among diabetes patients, the adjusted risk of MI increased with severity of CAD (no CAD: reference; non-obstructive CAD: adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.71, 95% CI: 0.79-3.68; obstructive CAD: adjusted incidence rate ratio 4.42, 95% CI: 2.14-9.17). Diabetes patients had higher death rates than non-diabetes patients, irrespective of CAD severity., Conclusion: In patients without CAD, diabetes patients have a low risk of MI similar to non-diabetes patients. Further, MI rates increase with CAD severity in both diabetes and non-diabetes patients; with diabetes patients with obstructive CAD having the highest risk of MI., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background Coronary CT angiography with noninvasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) predicts lesion-specific ischemia when compared with invasive FFR. The longer term prognostic value of CT-derived FFR (FFR CT ) is unknown. Purpose To determine the prognostic value of FFR CT when compared with coronary CT angiography and describe the relationship of the numeric value of FFR CT with outcomes. Materials and Methods This prospective subanalysis of the NXT study (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01757678) evaluated participants suspected of having stable coronary artery disease who were referred for invasive angiography and who underwent FFR, coronary CT angiography, and FFR CT . The incidence of the composite primary end point of death, myocardial infarction, and any revascularization and the composite secondary end point of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: cardiac death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization) were compared for an FFR CT of 0.8 or less versus stenosis of 50% or greater on coronary CT angiograms, with treating physicians blinded to the FFR CT result. Results Long-term outcomes were obtained in 206 individuals (age, 64 years ± 9.5), including 64% men. At median follow-up of 4.7 years, there were no cardiac deaths or myocardial infarctions in participants with normal FFR CT . The incidence of the primary end point was more frequent in participants with positive FFR CT compared with clinically significant stenosis at coronary CT angiography (73.4% [80 of 109] vs 48.7% [91 of 187], respectively; P < .001), with the majority of outcomes being planned revascularization. Corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) were 9.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.1, 17; P < .001) for FFR CT and 5.9 (95% CI: 1.5, 24; P = .01) for coronary CT angiography. FFR CT was a superior predictor compared with coronary CT angiography for primary end point (C-index FFR CT , 0.76 vs coronary CT angiography, 0.54; P < .001) and MACE (FFR CT , 0.71 vs coronary CT angiography, 0.52; P = .001). Frequency of MACE was higher in participants with positive FFR CT compared with coronary CT angiography (15.6% [17 of 109] vs 10.2% [19 of 187], respectively; P = .02), driven by unplanned revascularization. MACE HR was 5.5 (95% CI: 1.6, 19; P = .006) for FFR CT and 2.0 ( 95% CI: 0.3, 14; P = .46) for coronary CT angiography. Each 0.05-unit FFR CT reduction was independently associated with greater incidence of primary end point (HR, 1.7; 95% CI: 1.4, 1.9; P < .001) and MACE (HR, 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.8; P < .001). Conclusion In stable patients referred for invasive angiography, a CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) value of 0.8 or less was a predictor of long-term outcomes driven by planned and unplanned revascularization and was superior to clinically significant stenosis on coronary CT angiograms. Additionally, the numeric value of FFR CT was an independent predictor of outcomes. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Dennie and Rubens in this issue.

Aims: Non-invasive assessment of stable chest pain patients is a critical determinant of resource utilization and clinical outcomes. Increasingly coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) with selective CCTA-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) is being used. The ADVANCE Registry, is a large prospective examination of using a CCTA and FFRCT diagnostic pathway in real-world settings, with the aim of determining the impact of this pathway on decision-making, downstream invasive coronary angiography (ICA), revascularization, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)., Methods and Results: A total of 5083 patients with symptoms concerning for coronary artery disease (CAD) and atherosclerosis on CCTA were enrolled at 38 international sites from 15 July 2015 to 20 October 2017. Demographics, symptom status, CCTA and FFRCT findings, treatment plans, and 90 days outcomes were recorded. The primary endpoint of reclassification between core lab CCTA alone and CCTA plus FFRCT-based management plans occurred in 66.9% [confidence interval (CI): 64.8-67.6] of patients. Non-obstructive coronary disease was significantly lower in ICA patients with FFRCT ≤0.80 (14.4%) compared to patients with FFRCT >0.80 (43.8%, odds ratio 0.19, CI: 0.15-0.25, P < 0.001). In total, 72.3% of subjects undergoing ICA with FFRCT ≤0.80 were revascularized. No death/myocardial infarction (MI) occurred within 90 days in patients with FFRCT >0.80 (n = 1529), whereas 19 (0.6%) MACE [hazard ratio (HR) 19.75, CI: 1.19-326, P = 0.0008] and 14 (0.3%) death/MI (HR 14.68, CI 0.88-246, P = 0.039) occurred in subjects with an FFRCT ≤0.80., Conclusions: In a large international multicentre population, FFRCT modified treatment recommendation in two-thirds of subjects as compared to CCTA alone, was associated with less negative ICA, predicted revascularization, and identified subjects at low risk of adverse events through 90 days.

Background: Coronary stenosis and plaque evaluation by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) may contribute to identify hemodynamically relevant lesions. We evaluated the most stenotic lesion including plaques proximal to it versus a total vessel analyses combined with stenosis for ischemia., Methods: Patients scheduled for clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for suspected coronary artery disease underwent coronary CTA and ICA including fractional flow reserve (FFR) as part of the NXT trial (clinicaltrials.govNCT01757678). Stenoses were visually graded ≤50%, 51-70%, and >70% on coronary CTA. Semi-automated plaque analyses were performed using a proximal to the FFR pressure sensor location (including the most severe lesion to the coronary ostium) versus a total vessel (vessel diameter ≥2 mm) approach. Coronary stenosis and plaque parameters were evaluated for discrimination of ischemia by logistic regressions and combined models analyzed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) with invasive FFR≤ 0.80 as reference standard., Results: In 254 patients, mean (±SD) age 64 (±10) years, 64% male, a coronary CTA stenosis >50% was present in 239 (49%) vessels. Invasive FFR was ≤0.80 in 100 (21%) vessels. Coronary stenosis severity and low-density non-calcified plaque (LD-NCP) volume were independent predictors of ischemia in the "proximal" and "total-vessel" analyses. Stenosis severity + total vessel LD-NCP assessment performed better than stenosis severity + proximal LD-NCP evaluation (Area under curve [AUC] (95%CI): 0.83 (0.78-0.87) vs 0.81 (0.76-0.86), p-value = 0.009), whereas stenosis severity + proximal LD-NCP performed better than stenosis alone (AUC (95%CI): 0.81 (0.76-0.86) vs 0.78 (0.73-0.83), p-value = 0.019)., Conclusion: Adding total vessel high-risk plaque volume to stenosis severity improves discrimination of ischemia in coronary CTA performed in patients with stable angina pectoris., (Copyright © 2018 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To assess the use of downstream coronary angiography (ICA) and short-term safety of frontline coronary CT angiography (CTA) with selective CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) testing in stable patients with typical angina pectoris., Methods and Results: Between 1 January 2016 and 30 June 2016 all patients (N = 774) referred to non-emergent ICA or coronary CTA at Aarhus University Hospital on a suspicion of CAD had frontline CTA performed. Downstream testing and treatment within 3 months and adverse events ≥90 days were registered. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of typical angina pectoris, which according to local practice would have resulted in referral to ICA, (low-intermediate-risk, n = 593 [76%]; high-risk, n = 181 [24%]) with mean pre-test probability of CAD of 31 ± 16% and 67 ± 16%, respectively. Coronary CTA was performed in 745 (96%) patients in whom FFRCT was prescribed in 212 (28%) patients. In the high- vs. low-intermediate-risk group, ICA was cancelled in 75% vs. 91%. Coronary revascularization was performed more frequently in high-risk than in low-intermediate-risk patients, 76% vs. 52% (P = 0.03). Mean follow-up time was 157 ± 50 days. Serious clinical events occurred in four patients, but not in any patients with cancelled ICA by coronary CTA with selective FFRCT testing., Conclusion: Frontline coronary CTA with selective FFRCT testing in stable patients with typical angina pectoris in real-world practice is associated with a high rate of safe cancellation of planned ICAs.

Objectives: The aims of the present study were: 1) to investigate the contribution of the extent of luminal stenosis and other lesion composition-related factors in predicting invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR); and 2) to explore the distribution of various combinations of morphological characteristics and the severity of stenosis among lesions demonstrating normal and abnormal FFR., Background: In patients with stable ischemic heart disease, FFR-guided revascularization, as compared with medical therapy alone, is reported to improve outcomes. Because morphological characteristics are the basis of plaque rupture and acute coronary events, a relationship between FFR and lesion characteristics may exist., Methods: This is a subanalysis of NXT (HeartFlowNXT: HeartFlow Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using Coronary CT Angiography), a prospective, multicenter study of 254 patients (age 64 ± 10 years, 64% male) with suspected stable ischemic heart disease; coronary computed tomography angiography including plaque morphology assessment, invasive angiography, and FFR were obtained for 383 lesions. Ischemia was defined by invasive FFR ≤0.80. Computed tomography angiography-defined morphological characteristics of plaques and their vascular location were used in univariate and multivariate analyses to examine their predictive value for invasive FFR. The distribution of various combinations of plaque morphological characteristics and the severity of stenosis among lesions demonstrating normal and abnormal FFR were examined., Results: The percentage of luminal stenosis, low-attenuation plaque (LAP) or necrotic core volume, left anterior descending coronary artery territory, and the presence of multiple lesions per vessel were the predictors of FFR. When grouped on the basis of degree of luminal stenosis, FFR-negative lesions had consistently smaller LAP volumes compared with FFR-positive lesions. The distribution of plaque characteristics in lesions with normal and abnormal FFR demonstrated that whereas FFR-negative lesions excluded likelihood of stenotic plaques with moderate to high LAP volumes, only one-third of FFR-positive lesions demonstrated obstructive plaques with moderate to high LAP volumes., Conclusions: In addition to the severity of luminal stenosis, necrotic core volume is an independent predictor of FFR. The distribution of plaque characteristics among lesions with varying luminal stenosis and normal and abnormal FFR may explain the outcomes associated with FFR-guided therapy., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: We hypothesize that in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), lower values of the ratio of total epicardial coronary arterial lumen volume to left ventricular myocardial mass (V/M) result in lower fractional flow reserve (FFR)., Methods: V/M was computed in 238 patients from the NXT trial who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA), quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and FFR measurement in 438 vessels. Nitroglycerin was administered prior to CT, QCA and FFR acquisition. The V/M ratio was quantified on a patient-level from CT image data by segmenting the epicardial coronary arterial lumen volume (V) and the left ventricular myocardial mass (M). Calcified and noncalcified plaque volumes were quantified using semi-automated software., Results: The median value of V/M (18.57 mm 3 /g) was used to define equal groups of low and high V/M patients. Patients with low V/M had greater diameter stenosis by QCA, more plaque and lower FFR (0.80 ± 0.12 vs. 0.87 ± 0.08; P < 0.0001) than those with high V/M. A total of 365 vessels in 202 patients had QCA stenosis ≤50% and measured FFR. In these patients, those with low V/M had higher percent diameter stenosis by QCA, greater total plaque volume and lower FFR (0.81 ± 0.12 vs. 0.88 ± 0.07; P < 0.0001) than those with high V/M. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, V/M was an independent predictor of FFR ≤0.80 (all p-values < 0.001)., Conclusions: Patients with a low V/M ratio have lower FFR overall and in non-obstructive CAD, independent of plaque measures., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study characterized and quantified subclinical atherosclerosis by coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) in first-degree relatives of patients with early onset coronary artery disease (CAD)., Background: A strong family history of CAD is an important risk factor for adverse cardiovascular events. Whether predisposed individuals suffer an increased burden of coronary atherosclerosis and adverse plaque features is not known., Methods: We included 88 healthy middle-aged first-degree relatives from 59 families with early onset CAD. Participants were matched by age and sex with 88 control patients with atypical angina or nonanginal chest pain and no family history of CAD, referred for coronary CTA. A blinded analysis of plaque burden and composition was performed using semiautomated plaque quantification software. The relative differences between the median volumes or the odds ratios (OR) were compared between groups, using a mixed model., Results: First-degree relatives had significantly more affected coronary segments than controls (0 segments: 30% vs. 49%, respectively; 1 to 2 segments: 27% vs. 32%, respectively; 3 to 4 segments: 18% vs. 6%, respectively; and ≥5 segments: 25% vs. 14%, respectively; p = 0.001). In a multivariate model, the relative differences of total plaque, total calcified plaque (CP), total noncalcified plaque (NCP), and total low-density NCP (LD-NCP) were 5.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8 to 11.9), 2.6 (95% CI: 1.5 to 4.5), 5.8 (95% CI: 2.9 to 12.0), and 3.6 (95% CI: 2.1 to 6.1), respectively. The adjusted OR of any positive remodeling plaque or any LD-NCP plaque was 4.2 (95% CI: 1.2 to 14) and 4.2 (95% CI: 1.9 to 9.5), respectively., Conclusions: Healthy first-degree relatives of patients with early onset CAD have an increased coronary plaque burden compared with symptomatic patients. The plaques display characteristics associated with myocardial ischemia and adverse coronary events., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: To summarize the scientific basis of CT derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) and present an updated review on the evidence from clinical trials and real-world observational data RECENT FINDINGS: In prospective multicenter studies of patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), FFR CT showed high diagnostic performance. More recently, FFR CT has advanced to the realm of clinical utility and real-world clinical practice with emerging data showing that FFR CT when compared to standard care is efficient in safely reducing downstream utilization of invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and costs, as well as improving the diagnostic yield of ICA. Moreover, FFR CT may broaden applicability of frontline coronary CTA testing to patients with high pre-test risk of CAD. Introducing FFR CT into clinical practice has the potential to significantly improve the management of patients with stable CAD. The optimal FFR CT testing interpretation strategy, as well as the relative cost-efficiency of FFR CT against standard noninvasive functional testing, need further investigation.

The application of computational fluid dynamics to coronary computed tomography angiography allows Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) to be calculated non-invasively (FFR CT ), enabling computation of FFR from coronary computed tomography angiography acquired at rest both for individual lesions as well as along the entire course of a coronary artery. FFR CT , validated in a number of accuracy studies and a large clinical utility trial, is beginning to penetrate clinical practice. Importantly, while accuracy trials compared FFR CT to invasively measured FFR at a single point in the coronary tree, clinical reports of FFR CT provide information regarding a patient's entire coronary vasculature. Specifically, in distal coronary segments, calculated FFR CT values may be low and below 0.80 even in the absence of localized stenoses within the course of the artery. As a result, the reporting physician needs to understand how to interpret the findings in a clinically useful and thoughtful fashion. This review provides a brief overview of the background of both invasively measured and computationally derived FFR, explains changes in FFR along the course of normal coronary arteries and those affected by coronary atherosclerosis, and outlines the relevance of measurement location when interpreting and reporting FFR and FFR CT results., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Data on the clinical utility of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR CT ) are sparse. In patients with intermediate (40-70%) coronary stenosis determined by coronary computed tomography angiography, we investigated the association of replacing standard myocardial perfusion imaging with FFR CT testing with downstream utilization of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and the diagnostic yield of ICA (rate of no obstructive disease, and rate of revascularization)., Methods and Results: This was a single-center observational study of symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease referred to coronary computed tomography angiography between 2013 and 2015. Patients were divided into 3 historical groups based on the adjunctive functional testing approach: myocardial perfusion imaging (n=1332) or FFR CT "implementation" (n=800) or "clinical use" (n=1391). Propensity score matching was used to estimate the average period effect on outcomes. Patients in the FFR CT clinical use group versus the myocardial perfusion imaging group were older and had higher pretest probability of obstructive disease. After adjusting for baseline risk characteristics, there was a reduction in downstream ICA utilization (absolute risk difference: -4.2; 95% CI, -6.9 to -1.6; P =0.002). In patients referred to ICA, findings of no obstructive coronary artery disease decreased (-12.8%; 95% CI, -22.2 to -3.4; P =0.008) and rate of coronary revascularization increased (14.1%; 95% CI, 3.3-24.9; P =0.01), as did availability of functional information for guidance of revascularization (27.8%; 95% CI, 11.3-44.4; P <0.001) after clinical adoption of FFR CT ., Conclusions: Replacing adjunctive myocardial perfusion imaging with FFR CT testing for functional assessment of intermediate stenosis determined by coronary computed tomography angiography in stable coronary artery disease was associated with less ICA utilization, and a higher ICA diagnostic yield. The findings in this observational study needs confirmation in prospective, randomized trials., (© 2017 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.)

Objectives: The goal of this study was to assess the real-world clinical utility of fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFR CT ) for decision-making in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD)., Background: FFR CT has shown promising results in identifying lesion-specific ischemia. The real-world feasibility and influence on the diagnostic work-up of FFR CT testing in patients suspected of having CAD are unknown., Methods: We reviewed the complete diagnostic work-up of nonemergent patients referred for coronary computed tomography angiography over a 12-month period at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, including all patients with new-onset chest pain with no known CAD and with intermediate-range coronary lesions (lumen reduction, 30% to 70%) referred for FFR CT . The study evaluated the consequences on downstream diagnostic testing, the agreement between FFR CT and invasively measured FFR or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and the short-term clinical outcome after FFR CT testing., Results: Among 1,248 patients referred for computed tomography angiography, 189 patients (mean age 59 years; 59% male) were referred for FFR CT , with a conclusive FFR CT result obtained in 185 (98%). FFR CT was ≤0.80 in 31% of patients and 10% of vessels. After FFR CT testing, invasive angiography was performed in 29%, with FFR measured in 19% and iFR in 1% of patients (with a tendency toward declining FFR-iFR guidance during the study period). FFR CT  ≤0.80 correctly classified 73% (27 of 37) of patients and 70% (37 of 53) of vessels using FFR ≤0.80 or iFR ≤0.90 as the reference standard. In patients with FFR CT >0.80 being deferred from invasive coronary angiography, no adverse cardiac events occurred during a median follow-up period of 12 (range 6 to 18 months) months., Conclusions: FFR CT testing is feasible in real-world symptomatic patients with intermediate-range stenosis determined by coronary computed tomography angiography. Implementation of FFR CT for clinical decision-making may influence the downstream diagnostic workflow of patients. Patients with an FFR CT value >0.80 being deferred from invasive coronary angiography have a favorable short-term prognosis., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to determine the diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) (FFR CT ) for the diagnosis of lesion-specific ischemia in nonculprit vessels of patients with recent in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Background: In patients with stable angina, FFR CT has high diagnostic performance in identification of ischemia-causing lesions. The potential value of FFR CT for assessment of multivessel disease in patients with recent STEMI has not been evaluated., Methods: Coronary CTA with calculation of FFR CT and invasive coronary angiography with FFR were performed 1 month after STEMI in patients with multivessel disease. Coronary CTA and invasive coronary angiography stenosis >50% were considered obstructive. Lesion-specific ischemia was assumed if FFR CT was ≤0.80. FFR ≤0.80 was the reference standard. To evaluate the influence of vessel size, the total coronary vessel lumen volume relative to left ventricular mass (volume-to-mass ratio) was calculated and compared with that of patients with stable angina., Results: The study evaluated 124 nonculprit vessels from 60 patients. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of FFR CT were 72%, 83%, and 66% versus 64% (p = 0.033), 93% (p = 0.15), and 49% (p < 0.001) for CTA and 72% (p = 1.00), 76% (p = 0.46), and 70% (p = 0.54) for invasive coronary angiography. Following STEMI, median volume-to-mass ratio was lower than in patients with stable angina, 53 versus 65 mm 3 /g (p = 0.009). In patients with volume-to-mass ratio ≥65 mm 3 /g (upper tertile) accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of FFR CT were all 83% versus 56% (p = 0.009), 75% (p = 0.61), and 44% (p = 0.003) in patients with <49 mm 3 /g (lower tertile)., Conclusions: The diagnostic performance of FFR CT for staged detection of ischemia in STEMI patients with multivessel disease is moderate. STEMI patients have a smaller vessel volume than do patients with stable angina. The diagnostic performance of FFR CT is influenced by the volume-to-mass ratio. This study does not support routine use of FFR CT in the post-STEMI setting. (Assessment of Coronary Stenoses Using Coronary CT-Angiography and Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve; NCT01739075)., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Congenital heart disease, primarily involving the left-sided structures, is often seen in patients with Turner Syndrome. Moreover, a few case reports have indicated that coronary anomalies may be more prevalent in Turner Syndrome than in the normal population. We therefore set out to systematically investigate coronary arterial anatomy by computed tomographic coronary angiography (coronary CTA) in Turner Syndrome patients., Methods: Fifty consecutive women with Turner Syndrome (mean age 47 years [17-71]) underwent coronary CTA. Patients were compared with 25 gender-matched controls., Results: Coronary anomaly was more frequent in patients with Turner Syndrome than in healthy controls [20% vs. 4% (p = 0.043)]. Nine out of ten abnormal cases had an anomalous left coronary artery anatomy (absent left main trunk, n = 7; circumflex artery originating from the right aortic sinus, n = 2). One case had a tubular origin of the right coronary artery above the aortic sinus. There was no correlation between the presence of coronary arterial anomalies and karyotype, bicuspid aortic valve, or other congenital heart defects., Conclusion: Coronary anomalies are highly prevalent in Turner Syndrome. The left coronary artery is predominantly affected, with an absent left main coronary artery being the most common anomaly. No hemodynamically relevant coronary anomalies were found., (Copyright © 2016 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. All rights reserved.)

Background: Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) plus estimation of fractional flow reserve using CTA (FFRCT) safely and effectively guides initial care over 90 days in patients with stable chest pain. Longer-term outcomes are unknown., Objectives: The study sought to determine the 1-year clinical, economic, and quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes of using FFRCT instead of usual care., Methods: Consecutive patients with stable, new onset chest pain were managed by either usual testing (n = 287) or CTA (n = 297) with selective FFRCT (submitted in 201, analyzed in 177); 581 of 584 (99.5%) completed 1-year follow-up. Endpoints were adjudicated major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization), total medical costs, and QOL., Results: Patients averaged 61 years of age with a mean 49% pre-test probability of coronary artery disease. At 1 year, MACE events were infrequent, with 2 in each arm of the planned invasive group and 1 in the planned noninvasive cohort (usual care strategy). In the planned invasive stratum, mean costs were 33% lower with CTA and selective FFRCT ($8,127 vs. $12,145 usual care; p < 0.0001); in the planned noninvasive stratum, mean costs did not differ when using an FFRCT cost weight of zero ($3,049 FFRCT vs. $2,579; p = 0.82), but were higher when using an FFRCT cost weight equal to CTA. QOL scores improved overall at 1 year (p < 0.001), with similar improvements in both groups, apart from the 5-item EuroQOL scale scores in the noninvasive stratum (mean change of 0.12 for FFRCT vs. 0.07 for usual care; p = 0.02)., Conclusions: In patients with stable chest pain and planned invasive coronary angiography, care guided by CTA and selective FFRCT was associated with equivalent clinical outcomes and QOL, and lower costs, compared with usual care over 1-year follow-up. (The PLATFORM Study: Prospective LongitudinAl Trial of FFRct: Outcome and Resource IMpacts [PLATFORM]; NCT01943903)., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Fractional flow reserve estimated using computed tomography (FFRCT) might improve evaluation of patients with chest pain., Objectives: The authors sought to determine the effect on cost and quality of life (QOL) of using FFRCT instead of usual care to evaluate stable patients with symptoms suspicious for coronary disease., Methods: Symptomatic patients without known coronary disease were enrolled into 2 strata based on whether invasive or noninvasive diagnostic testing was planned. In each stratum, consecutive observational cohorts were evaluated with either usual care or FFRCT. The number of diagnostic tests, invasive procedures, hospitalizations, and medications during 90-day follow-up were multiplied by U.S. cost weights and summed to derive total medical costs. Changes in QOL from baseline to 90 days were assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, the EuroQOL, and a visual analog scale., Results: In the 584 patients, 74% had atypical angina, and the pre-test probability of coronary disease was 49%. In the planned invasive stratum, mean costs were 32% lower among the FFRCT patients than among the usual care patients ($7,343 vs. $10,734 p < 0.0001). In the noninvasive stratum, mean costs were not significantly different between the FFRCT patients and the usual care patients ($2,679 vs. $2,137; p = 0.26). In a sensitivity analysis, when the cost weight of FFRCT was set to 7 times that of computed tomography angiography, the FFRCT group still had lower costs than the usual care group in the invasive testing stratum ($8,619 vs. $ 10,734; p < 0.0001), whereas in the noninvasive testing stratum, when the cost weight of FFRCT was set to one-half that of computed tomography angiography, the FFRCT group had higher costs than the usual care group ($2,766 vs. $2,137; p = 0.02). Each QOL score improved in the overall study population (p < 0.0001). In the noninvasive stratum, QOL scores improved more in FFRCT patients than in usual care patients: Seattle Angina Questionnaire 19.5 versus 11.4, p = 0.003; EuroQOL 0.08 versus 0.03, p = 0.002; and visual analog scale 4.1 versus 2.3, p = 0.82. In the invasive cohort, the improvements in QOL were similar in the FFRCT and usual care patients., Conclusions: An evaluation strategy based on FFRCT was associated with less resource use and lower costs within 90 days than evaluation with invasive coronary angiography. Evaluation with FFRCT was associated with greater improvement in quality of life than evaluation with usual noninvasive testing. (Prospective Longitudinal Trial of FFRCT: Outcomes and Resource Impacts [PLATFORM]; NCT01943903)., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The goal of this study was to examine the diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) (FFRCT) in relation to coronary calcification severity., Background: FFRCT has shown promising results in identifying lesion-specific ischemia. The extent to which the severity of coronary calcification affects the diagnostic performance of FFRCT is not known., Methods: Coronary calcification was assessed by using the Agatston score (AS) in 214 patients suspected of having coronary artery disease who underwent coronary CTA, FFRCT, and FFR (FFR examination was performed in 333 vessels). The diagnostic performance of FFRCT (≤0.80) in identifying vessel-specific ischemia (FFR ≤0.80) was investigated across AS quartiles (Q1 to Q4) and for discrimination of ischemia in patients and vessels with a low-mid AS (Q1 to Q3) versus a high AS (Q4). Coronary CTA stenosis was defined as lumen reduction >50%., Results: Mean ± SD per-patient and per-vessel AS were 302 ± 468 (range 0 to 3,599) and 95 ± 172 (range 0 to 1,703), respectively. There was no statistical difference in diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity of FFRCT across AS quartiles. Discrimination of ischemia by FFRCT was high in patients with a high AS (416 to 3,599) and a low-mid AS (0 to 415), with no difference in area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) (0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76 to 0.96] vs. 0.92 [95% CI: 0.88 to 0.96]) (p = 0.45). Similarly, discrimination of ischemia by FFRCT was high in vessels with a high AS (121 to 1,703) and a low-mid AS (0 to 120) (AUC: 0.91 [95% CI: 0.85 to 0.97] vs. 0.95 [95% CI: 0.91 to 0.98]; p = 0.65). Diagnostic accuracy and specificity of FFRCT were significantly higher than for stenosis assessment in each AS quartile at the per-patient (p < 0.001) and per-vessel (p < 0.05) level with similar sensitivity. In vessels with a high AS, FFRCT exhibited improved discrimination of ischemia compared with coronary CTA alone (AUC: 0.91 vs. 0.71; p = 0.004), whereas on a per-patient level, the difference did not reach statistical significance (AUC: 0.86 vs. 0.72; p = 0.09)., Conclusions: FFRCT provided high and superior diagnostic performance compared with coronary CTA interpretation alone in patients and vessels with a high AS., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Direct health provider to patient presentation of coronary computed tomography angiography findings may increase adherence to preventive therapy and risk modification. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of visualization of coronary artery calcification and lifestyle recommendations on cholesterol concentrations and other risk variables in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease and hyperlipidemia., Methods: We performed a prospective 2-center randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 to intervention or standard follow-up in general practice. The primary end point was change in plasma total cholesterol concentration at 6 months follow-up., Results: We included 189 patients (mean [± standard deviation] age 61 [12] years, 57% were male). Median (range) Agatston score was 166 (70-2054). The reduction in plasma total cholesterol concentrations tended to be higher in the intervention group than in the control group, 51.04 mg/dL versus 45.63 mg/dL (P = .181). In a subgroup including patients continuing statin therapy during follow-up (n = 147), the reduction in plasma total cholesterol concentrations was more pronounced in the intervention group than in the control group, 66.13 mg/dL versus 55.68 mg/dL (P = .027). In the intervention group, there was a higher degree of statin adherence and a higher proportion of patients who stopped smoking and commenced healthier dietary behavior than in the control group., Conclusions: Visualization of coronary artery calcification and brief recommendations about risk modification after coronary computed tomography angiography in symptomatic patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease and hyperlipidemia may have a favorable influence on plasma total cholesterol concentration, adherence to statin therapy, and risk behavior. Further investigations are needed., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In clinical practice, a normal or near-normal invasive coronary angiogram is considered to be reliable evidence for the absence of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. We present 2 patients with near-normal coronary angiograms who had noninvasive evidence of vessel-specific ischemia confirmed by invasive measurement of fractional flow reserve., (Copyright © 2015 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the standard of reference for assessing the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography (FFRCT) is a promising new noninvasive method for assessing the physiologic significance of epicardial stenoses. The reproducibility of FFRCT has not yet been established., Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the variation of repeated analyses of FFRCT per se and in the context of the reproducibility of repeated FFR measurements., Methods: Coronary CT angiography and invasive coronary angiography with repeated FFR measurements were performed in 28 patients (58 vessels) with suspected stable coronary artery disease. Based on the coronary CT angiography data set, FFRCT analyses were performed twice by 2 independent blinded analysts., Results: In 12 of 58 (21%) vessels FFR was ≤ 0.80. The standard deviation for the difference between first and second FFRCT analyses was 0.034 vs 0.033 for FFR repeated measurements (P = .722). Limits of agreement were -0.06 to 0.08 for FFRCT and -0.07 to 0.06 for FFR. The coefficient of variation of FFRCT (CVFFRct) was 3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4%-4.6%) vs 2.7% (95% CI, 1.8%-3.3%) for FFR. In vessels with mean FFR ranging between 0.70 and 0.90 (n = 25), the difference between the first and second FFRCT analyses was 0.035 and FFR repeated measurements was 0.043 (P = .357), whereas CVFFRct was 3.3% (95% CI, 1.5%-4.3%) and coefficient of variation for FFR was 3.6% (95% CI, 2.3%-4.6%)., Conclusions: The reproducibility of both repeated FFRCT analyses and repeated FFR measurements is high., (Copyright © 2014 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine the diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from standard acquired coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) datasets (FFR(CT)) for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia in patients with suspected stable coronary artery disease (CAD)., Background: FFR measured during invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the gold standard for lesion-specific coronary revascularization decisions in patients with stable CAD. The potential for FFR(CT) to noninvasively identify ischemia in patients with suspected CAD has not been sufficiently investigated., Methods: This prospective multicenter trial included 254 patients scheduled to undergo clinically indicated ICA for suspected CAD. Coronary CTA was performed before ICA. Evaluation of stenosis (>50% lumen reduction) in coronary CTA was performed by local investigators and in ICA by an independent core laboratory. FFR(CT) was calculated and interpreted in a blinded fashion by an independent core laboratory. Results were compared with invasively measured FFR, with ischemia defined as FFR(CT) or FFR ≤0.80., Results: The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for FFR(CT) was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87 to 0.94) versus 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76 to 0.87) for coronary CTA (p = 0.0008). Per-patient sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) to identify myocardial ischemia were 86% (95% CI: 77% to 92%) and 79% (95% CI: 72% to 84%) for FFR(CT) versus 94% (86 to 97) and 34% (95% CI: 27% to 41%) for coronary CTA, and 64% (95% CI: 53% to 74%) and 83% (95% CI: 77% to 88%) for ICA, respectively. In patients (n = 235) with intermediate stenosis (95% CI: 30% to 70%), the diagnostic accuracy of FFR(CT) remained high., Conclusions: FFR(CT) provides high diagnostic accuracy and discrimination for the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant CAD with invasive FFR as the reference standard. When compared with anatomic testing by using coronary CTA, FFR(CT) led to a marked increase in specificity. (HeartFlowNXT-HeartFlow Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using Coronary CT Angiography [HFNXT]; NCT01757678)., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Coronary CT angiography (CTA) is an established noninvasive method for visualization of coronary artery disease. However, coronary CTA lacks physiological information; thus, it does not permit differentiation of ischemia-causing lesions. Recent advances in computational fluid dynamic techniques applied to standard coronary CTA images allow for computation of fractional flow reserve (FFR), a measure of lesion-specific ischemia. The diagnostic performance of computed FFR (FFRCT) compared with invasively measured FFR is not yet fully established., Methods/design: HeartFlowNXT (HeartFlow analysis of coronary blood flow using coronary CT angiography: NeXt sTeps) is a prospective, international, multicenter study designed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FFRCT for the detection and exclusion of flow-limiting obstructive coronary stenoses, as defined by invasively measured FFR as the reference standard. FFR values ≤ 0.80 will be considered to be ischemia causing. All subjects (N = 270; 10 investigative sites) will undergo coronary CTA (single- or dual-source CT scanners with a minimum of 64 slices) and invasive coronary angiography with FFR. Patients with insufficient quality of coronary CTA will be excluded. Blinded core laboratory interpretation will be performed for FFRCT, invasive coronary angiography, and FFR. Stenosis severity by coronary CTA will be evaluated by the investigative site in addition to a blinded core laboratory interpretation. The primary objective of the study is to determine the diagnostic performance of FFRCT compared with coronary CTA alone to noninvasively determine the presence of hemodynamically significant coronary lesions. The secondary end point comprises assessment of diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FFRCT., (Copyright © 2013 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate in patients with stable angina the effects on costs of frontline diagnostics by exercise-stress testing (ex-test) vs. coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)., Methods and Results: In two coronary units at Lillebaelt Hospital, Denmark, 498 patients were identified in whom either ex-test (n = 247) or CTA (n = 251) were applied as the frontline diagnostic strategy in symptomatic patients with a low-intermediate pre-test probability of coronary artery disease (CAD). During 12 months of follow-up, death, myocardial infarction and costs associated with downstream diagnostic utilization (DTU), treatment, ambulatory visits, and hospitalizations were registered. There was no difference between cohorts in demographic characteristics or the pre-test probability of significant CAD. The mean (SD) age was 56 (11) years; 52% were men; and 96% were at low-intermediate pre-test probability of CAD. All serious cardiac events (n = 3) during follow-up occurred in patients with a negative ex-test result. Mean costs per patient associated with DTU, ambulatory visits, and cardiovascular medication were significantly higher in the ex-test than in the CTA group. The mean (SD) total costs per patient at the end of the follow-up were 14% lower in the CTA group than in the ex-test group, € 1510 (3474) vs. €1777 (3746) (P = 0.03)., Conclusion: Diagnostic assessment of symptomatic patients with a low-intermediate probability of CAD by CTA incurred lower costs when compared with the ex-test. These findings need confirmation in future prospective trials.

Background: While patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and cerebrovascular disease share similar risk factor profiles, data on whether IS can be considered a "CAD equivalent" are limited. We aimed to determine whether ischemic stroke is an independent predictor of CAD by using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CTA)., Methods: We analyzed the CTA in 392 patients with no history of CAD (24 patients with acute IS and 368 patients with acute chest pain). Extent of plaque burden was additionally dichotomized into 0-4 versus >4 segments., Results: Patients with IS had a near 5-fold increase odds of having coronary artery plaque (odds ratio [OR] 4.9, P<0.01) as compared to those without IS. After adjustment for age, gender, and traditional cardiac risk factors, there remained a near 4-fold increase odds for coronary plaque (adjusted OR 3.7, P=0.04). When stratified by extent of plaque, patients with IS had over 18-fold increase odds of having >4 segments of plaque than 0-4 segments as compared to patients without stroke (OR 18.3, P<0.01), which remained significantly associated in adjusted analysis (adjusted OR 12.1, P<0.001)., Conclusion: Acute IS is independently associated with higher risk and greater extent of CAD compared to patients with acute chest pain at low-to-intermediate risk for acute coronary syndrome., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is an independent and incremental risk marker. This marker has previously not been compared to the HeartScore risk model., Design: A random sample of 1825 citizens (men and women, 50 or 60 years of age) was invited for screening., Methods: Using the HeartScore model, the 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular events based on gender, age, smoking, systolic blood pressure, and total cholesterol was estimated. A low risk was defined as <5%. The CAC score was calculated from a non-contrast enhanced cardiac-CT scan and given in Agatston U., Results: A total of 1257 (69%) of the invited subjects were interested in the screening. Due to previous cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus, 101 were excluded. Of the remaining 1156, 47% were men and 53% women; one half were 50 years old and the other half 60 years old. A low HeartScore was found in 901 of which 334 (37%) had CAC. A high HeartScore was recorded in 251 of which 80 (32%) did not have any CAC. High HeartScores and CAC were significantly more common in males than females., Conclusions: CAC is common in healthy middle-aged Danes with a low HeartScore, and, on the contrary, high-risk subjects very frequently do not have CAC. The therapeutic and prognostic implications of these observations remain to be clarified.

It has been proposed that the increasing use of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) may introduce additional unnecessary diagnostic procedures. However, no previous study has assessed the impact on downstream test utilization of conventional diagnostic testing relative to CTA in patients suspected of angina. The purpose of this study was to investigate the consequences of frontline exercise-stress testing (Ex-test) versus CTA on downstream test utilization in clinical practice. In two collaborating departments using either Ex-test (n = 247) or CTA (n = 251) as the frontline diagnostic test in patients suspected of angina, comparable cohorts of consecutive patients were retrospectively identified (Jan. 2007-Feb. 2008). Downstream test utilization (invasive coronary angiography, ICA; myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, and CTA) during 12 months after the index diagnostic test was recorded. Mean age was 56 years (51% men), and 96% of the total study cohort were at low-intermediate pretest risk of significant coronary disease. Overall, downstream test utilization was more frequent in the Ex-test group than in the CTA group, 32% versus 21% (P = 0.003). Subsequent myocardial scintigraphy was more frequent used (9% versus 4%, P = 0.03), whereas ICA tended to be more frequent applied in the Ex-test versus CTA group (23% vs. 18%, P = 0.15). A frontline diagnostic use in symptomatic patients of Ex-test in comparison to CTA leads to more downstream diagnostic test utilization. Future prospective trials are needed in order to define the most cost-effective diagnostic use of CTA relative to conventional ischemia testing.

We evaluated the influence of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) as a first-line diagnostic test on patient treatment and prognosis. A total of 1,055 consecutive patients with suspected stable angina pectoris (mean age 55 ± 10 years, 56% women) and a low to intermediate pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) were included in the present study. The patients were followed for a median of 18 months. The use of downstream diagnostic testing and medical therapy after CTA were recorded. The CTA result was normal in 49%, and nonobstructive and obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis) was demonstrated in 31% and 15% of the patients, respectively. Coronary CTA was inconclusive in 5% of the patients. The use of antiplatelet therapy decreased with normal findings from CTA, and the use of antiplatelet and lipid-lowering agents increased in patients with CAD. Additional testing was performed in 2% of patients with normal CTA findings and in 7% and 82% of patients with nonobstructive or obstructive CAD, respectively. No patients without CAD, 0.9% of patients with nonobstructive CAD, and 1.9% of patients with obstructive CAD met the primary end point (cardiovascular death and myocardial infarction, p = 0.008). No patients without CAD, 1.5% of patients with nonobstructive CAD, and 30% patients with obstructive CAD met the secondary end point (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization, p <0.0001). In conclusion, in patients suspected of having angina, the findings from CTA influence patient treatment without resulting in excessive additional testing. Coronary CTA provides important prognostic information, with excellent intermediate-term outcomes in patients with normal CTA findings., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In patients suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD), we compared the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of exercise testing using ST-segment changes alone and ST-segment changes, angina pectoris, and hemodynamic variables compared to coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA). Quantitative invasive coronary angiography was the reference method (>50% coronary lumen reduction). A positive exercise test was defined as the development of significant ST-segment changes (> or =1 mV measured 80 ms from the J-point), and the occurrence of one or more of the following criteria: ST-segment changes > or =1 mV measured 80 ms from the J-point, angina pectoris, ventricular arrhythmia (the occurrence of > or =3 premature ventricular beats), and > or =20 mm Hg decrease in systolic blood pressure during the test. Positive results on CTA were defined as a coronary lumen reduction of > or =50%. In 100 patients (61 +/- 9 years old, 50% men, and 29% prevalence of significant CAD), the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of exercise testing using ST-segment changes was 45% (95% confidence interval 53% to 87%) and 63% (95% confidence interval 61% to 84%), respectively. However, the inclusion of all test variables yielded a sensitivity of 72% (95% confidence interval 53% to 87%) and a specificity of 37% (95% confidence interval 26% to 49%). The diagnostic sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence interval 82% to 100%) and specificity of 80% (95% confidence interval 69% to 89%) for CTA, however, were superior to any of the exercise test analysis strategies. In conclusion, in patients suspected of having CAD, the diagnostic sensitivity of exercise testing significantly improves if all test variables are included compared to using ST-segment changes exclusively. Furthermore, the superior diagnostic performance of CTA for the detection and exclusion of significant CAD might favor CTA as the first-line diagnostic test in patients suspected of having CAD., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The optimal method of determining the pretest risk of coronary artery disease as a patient selection tool before coronary multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is unknown., Objective: We investigated the ability of 3 different clinical risk scores to predict the outcome of coronary MDCT., Methods: This was a retrospective study of 551 patients consecutively referred for coronary MDCT on a suspicion of coronary artery disease. Diamond-Forrester, Duke, and Morise risk models were used to predict coronary artery stenosis (>50%) as assessed by coronary MDCT. The models were compared by receiver operating characteristic analysis. The distribution of low-, intermediate-, and high-risk persons, respectively, was established and compared for each of the 3 risk models., Results: Overall, all risk prediction models performed equally well. However, the Duke risk model classified the low-risk patients more correctly than did the other models (P < 0.01). In patients without coronary artery calcification (CAC), the predictive value of the Duke risk model was superior to the other risk models (P < 0.05). Currently available risk prediction models seem to perform better in patients without CAC. Between the risk prediction models, there was a significant discrepancy in the distribution of patients at low, intermediate, or high risk (P < 0.01)., Conclusions: The 3 risk prediction models perform equally well, although the Duke risk score may have advantages in subsets of patients. The choice of risk prediction model affects the referral pattern to MDCT., (Copyright (c) 2009 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Coronary CT angiography (CTA) is a promising method used for diagnostic evaluation of patients suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD). CTA is increasingly used as an alternative to conventional coronary angiography. Information on the diagnostic and therapeutic consequences of using CTA in the diagnostic work-up of patients suspected of CAD is sparse., Material and Methods: Out-clinic patients (n = 215) with chest pain and an intermediate pre-test probability of CAD were referred to diagnostic evaluation by CTA., Results: CTA was not performed in 5% (11/215) due to extensive coronary calcification or arrhythmia, was non-conclusive in 7% (15/215) and was diagnostic in 88% (189/215) of the patients. CTA excluded CAD in 46% (99/215) of the patients. No further diagnostic or hospital follow-up after CTA was necessary in 73% (156/215) of the patients. CTA identified non-significant CAD in 27% (57/215) and significant CAD (>or= 50% stenosis) in 15% (33/215) of the patients. The proportion of patients with CAD in relevant antithrombotic and lipid-lowering medication increased following CTA. Further diagnostic evaluation with coronary angiography following CTA was indicated in 18% (39/215) of the patients due to obstructive CAD (n = 21), non-diagnostic examination (n = 7), or the presence of extensive coronary calcification or arrhythmia (n = 11)., Conclusion: CTA ruled-out CAD in 46% of the patients. No further diagnostic testing or hospital follow-up after CTA was necessary in 73% of the patients. CTA seems valuable in excluding CAD, and may prevent unnecessary invasive angiography in patients without CAD.

Objective: To assess the accuracy of a virtual stenting tool based on coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from CCTA (FFRCT Planner) across different levels of image quality. Materials and methods: Prospective, multicenter, single-arm study of patients with chronic coronary syndromes and lesions with FFR ≤ 0.80. All patients underwent CCTA performed with recent-generation scanners. CCTA image quality was adjudicated using the four-point Likert scale at a per-vessel level by an independent committee blinded to the FFRCT Planner. Patient- and technical-related factors that could affect the FFRCT Planner accuracy were evaluated. The FFRCT Planner was applied mirroring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to determine the agreement with invasively measured post-PCI FFR. Results: Overall, 120 patients (123 vessels) were included. Invasive post-PCI FFR was 0.88 ± 0.06 and Planner FFRCT was 0.86 ± 0.06 (mean difference 0.02 FFR units, the lower limit of agreement (LLA) − 0.12, upper limit of agreement (ULA) 0.15). CCTA image quality was assessed as excellent (Likert score 4) in 48.3%, good (Likert score 3) in 45%, and sufficient (Likert score 2) in 6.7% of patients. The FFRCT Planner was accurate across different levels of image quality with a mean difference between FFRCT Planner and invasive post-PCI FFR of 0.02 ± 0.07 in Likert score 4, 0.02 ± 0.07 in Likert score 3 and 0.03 ± 0.08 in Likert score 2, p = 0.695. Nitrate dose ≥ 0.8mg was the only independent factor associated with the accuracy of the FFRCT Planner (95%CI − 0.06 to − 0.001, p = 0.040). Conclusion: The FFRCT Planner was accurate in predicting post-PCI FFR independent of CCTA image quality. Clinical relevance statement: Being accurate in predicting post-PCI FFR across a wide spectrum of CT image quality, the FFRCT Planner could potentially enhance and guide the invasive treatment. Adequate vasodilation during CT acquisition is relevant to improve the accuracy of the FFRCT Planner. Key Points: • The fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography (FFRCT) Planner is a novel tool able to accurately predict fractional flow reserve after percutaneous coronary intervention. • The accuracy of the FFRCT Planner was confirmed across a wide spectrum of CT image quality. Nitrates dose at CT acquisition was the only independent predictor of its accuracy. • The FFRCT Planner could potentially enhance and guide the invasive treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Coronary CT angiography (CTA) derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) shows high diagnostic performance when compared to invasively measured FFR. Presence and extent of low attenuation plaque density have been shown to be associated with abnormal physiology by measured FFR. Moreover, it is well established that statin therapy reduces the rate of plaque progression and results in morphology alterations underlying atherosclerosis. However, the interplay between lipid lowering treatment, plaque regression, and the coronary physiology has not previously been investigated. Aim: To test whether lipid lowering therapy is associated with significant improvement in FFRCT, and whether there is a dose–response relationship between lipid lowering intensity, plaque regression, and coronary flow recovery. Methods: Investigator driven, prospective, multicenter, randomized study of patients with stable angina, coronary stenosis ≥50% determined by clinically indicated first‐line CTA, and FFRCT ≤ 0.80 in whom coronary revascularization was deferred. Patients are randomized to standard (atorvastatin 40 mg daily) or intensive (rosuvastatin 40 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg daily) lipid lowering therapy for 18 months. Coronary CTA scans with blinded coronary plaque and FFRCT analyses will be repeated after 9 and 18 months. The primary endpoint is the 18‐month difference in FFRCT using (1) the FFRCT value 2 cm distal to stenosis and (2) the lowest distal value in the vessel of interest. A total of 104 patients will be included in the study. Conclusion: The results of this study will provide novel insights into the interplay between lipid lowering, and the pathophysiology in coronary artery disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims  This study sought to investigate outcomes following a normal CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) result in patients with moderate stenosis and coronary artery calcification, and to describe the relationship between the extent of calcification, stenosis, and FFRCT. Methods and results Data from 975 consecutive patients suspected of chronic coronary syndrome with stenosis (30–70%) determined by computed CT angiography and FFRCT to guide downstream management decisions were reviewed. Median (range) follow-up time was 2.2 (0.5–4.2) years. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores were ≥400 in 25%, stenosis ≥50% in 83%, and FFRCT >0.80 in 51% of the patients. There was a lower incidence of the composite endpoint (death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, and unplanned coronary revascularization) at 4.2 years in patients with any CAC and FFRCT > 0.80 vs. FFRCT ≤ 0.80 (3.9% and 8.7%, P  = 0.04), however, in patients with CAC scores ≥400 the risk difference between groups did not reach statistical significance, 4.2% vs. 9.7% (P  = 0.24). A negative relationship between CAC scores and FFRCT irrespective of stenosis severity was demonstrated. Conclusion FFRCT shows promise in identifying patients with stenosis and calcification who can be managed without further downstream testing. Moreover, an inverse relationship between CAC levels and FFRCT was demonstrated. Studies are needed to further assess the clinical utility of FFRCT in patients with extensive coronary calcification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims We examined whether severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) measured by coronary computed tomography angiography can be used to predict rates of myocardial infarction (MI) and death in patients with and without diabetes. Methods and results A cohort study of consecutive patients (n  = 48 731) registered in the Western Denmark Cardiac Computed Tomography Registry from 2008 to 2016. Patients were stratified by diabetes status and CAD severity (no, non-obstructive, or obstructive). Endpoints were MI and death. Event rates per 1000 person-years, unadjusted and adjusted incidence rate ratios were computed. Median follow-up was 3.6 years. Among non-diabetes patients, MI event rates per 1000 person-years were 1.4 for no CAD, 4.1 for non-obstructive CAD, and 9.1 for obstructive CAD. Among diabetes patients, the corresponding rates were 2.1 for no CAD, 4.8 for non-obstructive CAD, and 12.6 for obstructive CAD. Non-diabetes and diabetes patients without CAD had similar low rates of MI [adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71–2.78]. Among diabetes patients, the adjusted risk of MI increased with severity of CAD (no CAD: reference; non-obstructive CAD: adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.71, 95% CI: 0.79–3.68; obstructive CAD: adjusted incidence rate ratio 4.42, 95% CI: 2.14–9.17). Diabetes patients had higher death rates than non-diabetes patients, irrespective of CAD severity. Conclusion In patients without CAD, diabetes patients have a low risk of MI similar to non-diabetes patients. Further, MI rates increase with CAD severity in both diabetes and non-diabetes patients; with diabetes patients with obstructive CAD having the highest risk of MI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Left ventricular (LV) lead position at the latest mechanically activated non-scarred myocardial LV region confers improved response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We conducted a double-blind, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the clinical benefit of multimodality imaging-guided LV lead placement in CRT.Methods and Results: Patients were allocated (1:1) to imaging-guided LV lead placement using cardiac computed tomography (CT) venography, 99m Technetium myocardial perfusion imaging, and speckle-tracking echocardiography radial strain to target the optimal coronary sinus (CS) branch closest to the non-scarred myocardial segment with latest mechanical activation (imaging group, n = 89) or to routine LV lead implantation in a posterolateral region with late electrical activation (control group, n = 93). The primary endpoint was clinical non-response to CRT [≥1 of the following after 6 months: (1) death, (2) heart failure hospitalization, or (3) no improvement in New York Heart Association class and <10% increase in 6-min walk distance]. Secondary outcomes included LV remodelling and the combination of all-cause mortality and hospitalization owing to heart failure during 1.8 ± 0.9 years. Analysis was intention-to-treat. In the imaging group, fewer patients reached the primary endpoint (26% vs. 42%, P = 0.02). More patients in the imaging group had the LV lead placed in the optimal CS branch (83% vs. 65%, P = 0.01). There were no between-group differences in reverse LV remodelling or the combined endpoint of death or hospitalizations for heart failure.Conclusions: Multimodality imaging-guided LV lead placement towards the CS branch closest to latest mechanically activated non-scarred myocardial LV segment reduces the proportion of clinical non-responders to CRT. Larger long-term multicentre studies are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We aimed to investigate if lesion-specific ischaemia by invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) can be predicted by an integrated machine learning (ML) ischaemia risk score from quantitative plaque measures from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA).Methods: In a multicentre trial of 254 patients, CTA and invasive coronary angiography were performed, with FFR in 484 vessels. CTA data sets were analysed by semi-automated software to quantify stenosis and non-calcified (NCP), low-density NCP (LD-NCP, < 30 HU), calcified and total plaque volumes, contrast density difference (CDD, maximum difference in luminal attenuation per unit area) and plaque length. ML integration included automated feature selection and model building from quantitative CTA with a boosted ensemble algorithm, and tenfold stratified cross-validation.Results: Eighty patients had ischaemia by FFR (FFR ≤ 0.80) in 100 vessels. Information gain for predicting ischaemia was highest for CDD (0.172), followed by LD-NCP (0.125), NCP (0.097), and total plaque volumes (0.092). ML exhibited higher area-under-the-curve (0.84) than individual CTA measures, including stenosis (0.76), LD-NCP volume (0.77), total plaque volume (0.74) and pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) (0.63); p < 0.006.Conclusions: Integrated ML ischaemia risk score improved the prediction of lesion-specific ischaemia by invasive FFR, over stenosis, plaque measures and pre-test likelihood of CAD.Key Points: • Integrated ischaemia risk score improved prediction of ischaemia over quantitative plaque measures • Integrated ischaemia risk score showed higher prediction of ischaemia than standard approach • Contrast density difference had the highest information gain to identify lesion-specific ischaemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To assess the use of downstream coronary angiography (ICA) and short-term safety of frontline coronary CT angiography (CTA) with selective CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) testing in stable patients with typical angina pectoris. Methods and results: Between 1 January 2016 and 30 June 2016 all patients (N = 774) referred to non-emergent ICA or coronary CTA at Aarhus University Hospital on a suspicion of CAD had frontline CTA performed. Downstream testing and treatment within 3 months and adverse events ≥90 days were registered. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of typical angina pectoris, which according to local practice would have resulted in referral to ICA, (low-intermediate-risk, n = 593 [76%]; high-risk, n = 181 [24%]) with mean pre-test probability of CAD of 31 ± 16% and 67 ± 16%, respectively. Coronary CTA was performed in 745 (96%) patients in whom FFRCT was prescribed in 212 (28%) patients. In the high- vs. low-intermediate-risk group, ICA was cancelled in 75% vs. 91%. Coronary revascularization was performed more frequently in high-risk than in low-intermediate-risk patients, 76% vs. 52% (P = 0.03). Mean follow-up time was 157 ± 50 days. Serious clinical events occurred in four patients, but not in any patients with cancelled ICA by coronary CTA with selective FFRCT testing. Conclusion: Frontline coronary CTA with selective FFRCT testing in stable patients with typical angina pectoris in real-world practice is associated with a high rate of safe cancellation of planned ICAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]