Search

Background: Rifampicin is a semisynthetic antibiotic derivative of rifamycin used worldwide for the treatment of various forms of tuberculosis. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare, under fasting conditions in healthy volunteers, the rate and extent of absorption of a generic rifampicin capsule in oral dosage form versus the proprietary equivalent formulation for the purpose of registration approval of the test formulation. Methods: This was an open-label, randomized, 2-treatment, 2-way crossover study with an 8-week washout period between the 2 study arms. Healthy volunteers received a 300-mg capsule of the test formulation (Idaman Pharma Manufacturing Sdn. Bhd.) or two 150-mg capsules of the reference formulation. Blood samples were collected predose and at 45 minutes and 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.25, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours postdose. Plasma concentrations of rifampicin and its metabolite, 25-desacetyl rifampicin, were analyzed using a validated HPLC method. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% CIs for C max and AUC were within the predetermined bioequivalence range (80%–125%, according to the guidelines of the US Food and Drug Administration, or 75%–133% for Cmax only, as set by the European Commission-European Medicines Agency and the National Pharmaceutical Control Bureau of Malaysia). Tolerability was assessed by verbally questioning subjects regarding their well-being and any feelings of discomfort. All events reported by the subjects (serious or mild) were recorded on adverse-event forms. Results: Fourteen healthy subjects (10 males, 4 females) with a mean age of 22.6 years (range, 20–28 years) and a mean body mass index of 22.2 kg/m 2 (range, 18.3-29.9 kg/m2) were enrolled in the study; all 14 completed the trial as outlined in the protocol. The mean values for C max , T max , AUC 0–24 , and AUC 0−∞ ) with the test formulation of rifampicin were 7.20 μg/mL, 1.32 hours, 37.12 μg/mL · h, and 39.69 μg/mL · h, respectively; for the reference formulation, the values were 7.65 μg/mL, 1.71 hours, 38.92 μg/mL · h, and 42.24 μg/ mL · h. For 25-desacetyl rifampicin, the mean values for C max , T max , AUC 0−24 , and AUC 0−∞ ) with the test formulation were 0.63 μg/mL, 3.45 hours, 4.92 μg/mL · h, and 6.27 μg/mL · h; for the reference formulation, the values were 0.7 μg/mL, 3.27 hours, 5.23 μg/mL · h, and 6.84 μg/mL · h. For rifampicin, the 90% CIs for the test formulation/reference formulation ratio for the logarithmic transformations of both C max and AUC 0−∞ ) were within the bioequivalence limit of 80% to 125% (80.9109.7 and 80.7–103.2, respectively). For 25-desacetyl rifampicin, the 90% CI for the test formulation/reference formulation ratio for the logarithmic transformations of AUC 0–24 (80.0–104.7) was within the bioequivalence limit of 80% to 125%. However, the 90% CI for C max (78.4–102.2) was outside this limit but still within the acceptance limit for Cmax when adhering to the bioequivalence range of 75% to 133%. No adverse events were reported during the study. Conclusions: This study found that the 300-mg test capsule and the 150-mg reference capsules of rifampicin met the regulatory criteria for assuming bioequivalence in these fasting healthy volunteers. Both formulations appeared to be well tolerated in the population studied.

The pharmacokinetics of sublingual artemether (ArTiMist) was investigated in two open-label studies. In study 1, 16 healthy males were randomized to each of four single-dose treatments administered in random order: (i) 15.0 mg of sublingual artemether (5 × 3.0 actuations), (ii) 30.0 mg of sublingual artemether (10 × 3.0 mg), (iii) 30.0 mg of sublingual artemether (5 × 6.0 mg), and (iv) 30.0 mg of artemether in tablet form. In study 2, 16 healthy males were randomized to eight 30.0-mg doses of sublingual artemether given over 5 days as either 10 3.0-mg or 5 6.0-mg actuations. Frequent blood samples were drawn postdose. Plasma artemether and dihydroartemisinin levels were measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Population compartmental pharmacokinetic models were developed. In study 1, sublingual artemether absorption was biphasic, with both rate constants being greater than that of the artemether tablets (1.46 and 1.66 versus 0.43/h, respectively). Relative to the tablets, sublingual artemether had greater bioavailability (≥1.24), with the greatest relative bioavailability occurring in the 30.0-mg dose groups (≥1.58). In study 2, there was evidence that the first absorption phase accounted for between 32% and 69% of the total dose and avoided first-pass (FP) metabolism, with an increase in FP metabolism occurring in later versus earlier doses but with no difference in bioavailability between the dose actuations. Sublingual artemether is more rapidly and completely absorbed than are equivalent doses of artemether tablets in healthy adults. Its disposition appears to be complex, with two absorption phases, the first representing pregastrointestinal absorption, as well as dose-dependent bioavailability and autoinduction of metabolism with multiple dosing.

The pharmacokinetics of sublingual artemether (ArTiMist) was investigated in 91 young African children with severe malaria or who could not tolerate oral antimalarial therapy. Each received 3.0 mg/kg of body weight of artemether at 0, 8, 24, 36, 48, and 60 h or until the initiation of oral treatment. Few blood samples were drawn postdose. Plasma artemether and dihydroartemisinin (DHA) levels were measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and the data were analyzed using established population compartmental pharmacokinetic models. Parasite clearance was prompt (median parasite clearance time, 24 h), and there were no serious adverse events. Consistent with studies in healthy adults (S. Salman, D. Bendel, T. C. Lee, D. Templeton, and T. M. E. Davis, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:3197–3207, 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.05013-14 ), the absorption of sublingual artemether was biphasic, and multiple dosing was associated with the autoinduction of the metabolism of artemether to DHA (which itself has potent antimalarial activity). In contrast to studies using healthy volunteers, pharmacokinetic modeling indicated that the first absorption phase did not avoid first-pass metabolism, suggesting that the drug is transferred to the upper intestine through postdose fluid/food intake. Simulations using the present data and those from an earlier study in older Melanesian children with uncomplicated malaria treated with artemether-lumefantrine tablets suggested that the bioavailability of sublingual artemether was at least equivalent to that after conventional oral artemether-lumefantrine (median [interquartile range] areas under the concentration-time curve for artemether, 3,403 [2,471 to 4,771] versus 3,063 [2,358 to 4,514] μg · h/liter, respectively; and for DHA, 2,958 [2,146 to 4,278] versus 2,839 [1,812 to 3,488] μg · h/liter, respectively; P ≥ 0.42). These findings suggest that sublingual artemether could be used as prereferral treatment for sick children before transfer for definitive management of severe or moderately severe malaria.

Background Midazolam is used widely as a sedative to facilitate mechanical ventilation. This prospective study investigated the population pharmacokinetics of midazolam in very premature infants. Methods Midazolam (100 microg/kg) was administered as a rapid intravenous bolus dose every 4-6 h to 60 very premature neonates with a mean (range) gestational age of 27 weeks (24-31 weeks), a birth weight of 965 g (523-1,470 g), and an age of 4.5 days (2-15 days). A median (range) of four (one to four) blood samples, 0.2 ml each, were drawn at random times after the first dose or during continuous treatment, and concentrations of midazolam in serum were assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography. A population analysis was conducted using a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model using the NONMEM program. Results Average parameter values (interpatient percent coefficient of variation) for infants with birth weights 1,000 g or less were total systemic clearance (Cl(T)) = 0.783 ml/min (83%), intercompartmental clearance (Cl(Q)) = 6.53 ml/min (116%), volume of distribution of the central compartment (V1) = 473 ml (70%), and volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment (V2) = 513 ml (146%). For infants with birth weights more than 1,000 g they were as follows: Cl(T) = 1.24 ml/min (78%), Cl(Q) = 9.82 ml/min (98%), V1 = 823 ml (43%), and V2 = 1,040 ml (193%). The intrapatient variability (percent coefficient of variation) in the data was 4.5% at the mean concentration midazolam in serum of 121 ng/mL. Conclusions Serum concentration-time data were used in modeling the population pharmacokinetics of midazolam in very premature, ventilated neonates. Clearance of midazolam was markedly decreased compared with previous data from term infants and older patients. Infants weighing less than 1,000 g at birth had significantly lower clearance than those weighing more than 1,000 g.

To evaluate the effects of intravenous midazolam on haemodynamic variables and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and to determine the pharmacokinetics using a population approach in very low birthweight (VLBW) ventilated infants.Physiological variables were measured at predetermined times in 10 infants with birthweightor = 1500 g following a bolus dose of intravenous midazolam (0.1 mg/kg). Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and transcutaneous CO2 (TcPCO2) were recorded and CBFV was assessed by Doppler ultrasound. Midazolam concentrations were also measured and pharmacokinetic parameters determined using a population modelling package.No change in heart rate occurred during the study period, while the MAP decreased by 3 mmHg 5 min after midazolam administration compared to baseline values. A non-significant fall in TcPCO2 was seen at 20 min. Mean CBFV decreased from the baseline by 12% at 5 min, then returning to predose values. Midazolam concentrations were in the range shown to be effective in sedation of paediatric intensive care infants with the elimination being delayed in comparison to older children.As only minor cerebral and haemodynamic effects were found with the use of midazolam in stable ventilated preterm infants, it appears to be a safe, short-term sedative agent.

1. Theophylline is commonly used in neonatology for the treatment and prophylaxis of apnoea of prematurity, and during ventilator weaning. 2. NONMEM was used to study the population pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral theophylline from retrospective drug monitoring data in 82 premature neonates, weighing < 1500 g at birth, and < or = 32 weeks gestational age. 3. Clearance (CL), volume of distribution (V), and oral bioavailability (F1) from liquid preparations were modelled alone, and under the influence of demographic and clinical covariates, assuming a 1-compartment model with first-order elimination. 4. The final population models with influential co-variates were as follows: CL (1h-1) = 0.0000123 *body weight (g) + 0.000377 *postnatal age (days); V (1) = 0.000937 *body weight (g); F = 0.918. 5. The CL was lower and V was higher than previously reported for less premature neonates, term babies, and older children. 6. Predictive performance of the population models was evaluated by Bayesian forecasting in a similar, but independent cohort of 30 infants. There was statistically insignificant bias and imprecision between measured and predicted serum theophylline concentrations. 7. Based on the validated population models, recommended maintenance theophylline dosages are provided for infants aged between 2 and 50 days, and weighing 700 to 2000 g.

The population pharmacokinetics of amoxicillin were determined in 40 very premature infants (or = 32 week gestational age,1500 g birth weight) who were receiving intravenous amoxicillin (50 mg/ kg, every 12 h) during the first days after birth. Serum amoxicillin concentrations were measured by HPLC. Clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd) were modeled alone and under the influence of demographic and clinical covariates with a 1-compartment model with first-order elimination. The final population models with influential covariates were: CL(L/h) = 0.0000610 x body weight (g) and CL (L/h) = 0.0000805 x body weight (g), for infants also receiving gentamicin and not receiving gentamicin, respectively; Vd(L) = 0.678. The interpatient standard deviation (SD) for CL was 0.0351 L/h, and for Vd was 0.365 L. The intrapatient variability (SD) among observed and model-predicted serum concentrations was 13.7 mg/L. Evaluation of the predictive performance of this model in another group of infants (n = 16) indicated statistically insignificant bias (p0.05) of 3 mg/L among pairs of observed and Bayesian-predicted amoxicillin concentrations. The average population CL was smaller, but the average Vd and terminal half-life (t1/2) were larger than previously reported for healthy adults.